DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Parliamentary Report: Global Parliamentary Report: the Changing Naturerepresentation of Parliamentary IPU - UNDP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Parliamentary Report: Global Parliamentary Report: the Changing Naturerepresentation of Parliamentary IPU - UNDP GLOBAL PARLIAMENTARY Better parliaments, stronger democracies. REPORT The changing nature of parliamentary representation Global Parliamentary Report: The changing nature of parliamentary changing nature representation The Global Parliamentary Report: IPU - UNDP. 2012 IPU - UNDP. Inter-Parliamentary Union ❙ United Nations Development Programme Lead author: Greg Power Assistant to the lead author: Rebecca A. Shoot Translation: Sega Ndoye (French), Peritos Traductores, S.C. (Spanish), Houria Qissi (Arabic) Cover design and layout: Kimberly Koserowski, First Kiss Creative LLC Printing: Phoenix Design Aid A/S Sales: United Nations Publications Photo credits: Cover Illustration: James Smith, pg. 9: UN Photo/Albert Gonzalez Farran, pg. 24: UK Parliament copyright, pg. 42: UNDP/Afghanistan, pg. 58: Fabián Rivadeneyra, pg. 72: Assemblée nationale 2012 April 2012 Copyright © UNDP and IPU All rights reserved Printed in Denmark Sales No.: E.11.III.B.19 ISBN: 978-92-1-126317-6 (UNDP) ISBN: 978-92-9142-532-7 (IPU) eISBN: 978-92-1-054990-5 Inter-Parliamentary Union United Nations Development Programme 5 chemin du Pommier Democratic Governance Group CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Bureau for Development Policy Geneva, Switzerland 304 East 45th Street, 10th Floor Telephone: +41 22 919 41 50 New York, NY, 10017, USA Fax: +41 22 919 41 60 Telephone: +1 (212) 906 5000 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +1 (212) 906 5857 www.ipu.org www.undp.org This publication results from the partnership between UNDP and IPU. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations, UNDP or IPU. Better parliaments, stronger democracies. GLOBAL PARLIAMENTARY REPORT The changing nature of parliamentary representation Inter-Parliamentary Union ❙ United Nations Development Programme April 2012 ADVISORY BOARD ■ Mr. Hafnaoui Amrani, Secretary General of the Algerian Council of the Nation ■ Mr. Josep Dallerès Codina, former Speaker of the Andorran General Council ■ Mr. Pierre Cornillon, Honorary Secretary General of the IPU ■ Mr. François Duluc, Head of the Inter-Parliamentary Cooperation Unit, French National Assembly ■ Ms. Frene Ginwala, former Speaker of the National Assembly of the Republic of South Africa ■ Mr. Scott Hubli, Director of Governance Programs, National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) ■ Ms. Marija Lugarić, former member of the Croatian Parliament ■ Mr. Robert Myttenaere, Honorary Secretary General of the Belgian House of Representatives ■ Mr. Mathurin Nago, President of the National Assembly of Benin ■ Mr. Rick Stapenhurst, former member of the World Bank Institute ■ Mr. Andrés Zaldivar, Senator and former Speaker of the Senate of Chile About the Lead Author Greg Power is a Director of social purpose company Global Partners & Associates (GPA), and a parliamentary specialist who has worked on projects to support the development of legislative institutions and political parties in the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans. He has published widely on parliamentary and party development, most recently these have included The Challenges of Political Programming: International Assistance to Parties and Parliaments (2011, International IDEA), and The Politics of Parliamentary Strengthening: Understanding Incentives and Institutional Behaviour in Parliamentary Support (WFD/GPA, 2011). He has provided strategic advice, analysis and programme evaluation for a variety of agencies including DANIDA, FCO, WFD and International IDEA. Between 2001 and 2005 he was special adviser to Rt Hon Robin Cook MP and then Rt Hon Peter Hain MP, as Leaders of the United Kingdom House of Commons on issues of parliamentary reform and wider democratic renewal. Prior to this he was Director of the Parliament and Government Programme at the Hansard Society. He is a Visiting Fellow at Hull University’s Centre for Legislative Studies. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The first Global Parliamentary Report was jointly ■ 663 parliamentarians who participated in the commissioned by the United Nations Development survey for the report. Programme (UNDP) and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). UNDP and IPU would like to express sincere thanks The following people kindly participated in the official to the hundreds of parliamentarians, parliamentary peer review on the draft report: Hafnaoui Amrani, Marc staff and parliamentary development practitioners who Bosc, Pierre Cornillon, Josep Dallères Codina, Franklin shared their expertise during the preparation of the DeVrieze, Scott Hubli, Niall Johnston, Hassan Krayem, report. Particular thanks go to Advisory Board whose Peter Lilienfeld, Robert Myttenaere, Mathurin Nago, valuable input guided the development of the report. Omar Ndoye, Sonia Palmieri, Leonard Preyra, Karin Riedl, We also recognize the important contribution made by Rick Stapenhurst, Andres Zaldivar. Additional feedback UNDP country offices and the Association of Secretaries on the draft was provided by Tim Baker, Sonia Escudero, General of Parliament throughout the process. Frank Feulner, Jeff Griffith, Gabriella Ilonszki, Ntoitha M’Mithiaru, Marcia Monge, Charmaine Rodrigues and UNDP and the IPU express their gratitude to the lead Ali Sawi. The following parliaments also commented on author of the report, Mr. Greg Power, and to Ms. Rebecca Shoot, who provided extensive assistance to him during the draft, with support from the Association of Secre- the research and drafting of the report. The authors wish taries General of Parliament: Canada, Estonia, Finland, to acknowledge the generous support of Lord Norton Germany, Hungary, Japan, Norway, Portugal, Romania, of Louth and Cristina Leston-Bandeira at Hull Univer- Sweden, Thailand, United Kingdom, Zimbabwe. sity’s Centre for Legislative Studies, and assistance of The report was made possible by funding from IPU, the Joel Barkan, Mark Baskin, Rob Clements, Ruth Fox, Chris Henshaw, Andrew Mandelbaum and Janet Seaton. Swedish International Development Agency, Nether- lands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Belgium Regional background papers for the report were contrib- (Federal Public Service Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and uted by Alexander Hamilton (Africa), Eduardo Núñez Vargas Development Cooperation), French Ministry of Foreign (Central America), Fatima Anastasia and Magna Inácio (Latin Affairs and Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation. America), Ali Sawi (Arab States), Niall Johnston and Shahnaz Karim (Asia), Gabriella Ilonszki (Central and Eastern Europe), This report was initiated and completed under the direc- Tim Baker (Central and Eastern Europe) and Quinton Clem- tion of Ms. Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi, UNDP Democratic ents, David Hegarty and Robert Nakamura (Pacific). Governance Group Practice Director, and Mr. Anders B. Johnsson, IPU Secretary General. Both organizations are We are deeply indebted to the: grateful for their effective support to Kevin Deveaux, ■ 73 parliaments that provided written Cédric Jurgensen, Franklin De Vrieze, Diane Sheinberg, contributions, listed in the References; Sofi Halling, Olivier Pierre-Louveaux, Sandra Macharia, ■ 129 parliaments that provided data for the Annex, Marilyn Cham and Steven Van-Wichelen at UNDP, and recognized at the end of the report; Martin Chungong, Andy Richardson, Hiroko Yamaguchi, ■ 69 parliamentarians who gave detailed interviews Agustina Novillo, Sung Jae Lee, Laurence Marzal, Karin to the authors; Riedl and other staff at the IPU. Global Parliamentary Report: The changing nature of parliamentary representation ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AFLI Africa Leadership Institute ANC African National Congress CDC Constituency development committees CDF Constituency development funds CSO Civil society organization GNI Gross national income IDEA International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance ICT Information and communication technology IPD Institute for Parliamentary Democracy (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) IPU Inter-Parliamentary Union LAMP Legislative Assistance to Members of Parliament programme LDC Least Developed Countries MP Member of Parliament MTU Mobile Training Units NDI National Democratic Institute for International Affairs NGO Non-governmental organization OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development PAC Public accounts committee PCS Parliamentary call system PILDAT Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency PMO Parliamentary monitoring organization PPP Purchasing Power Parity PR Proportional representation STV Single Transferable Vote TLC Thematic legislative communities UNDP United Nations Development Programme USAID United States Agency for International Development WBI World Bank Institute Chapter Title CONTENTS FOREWORD ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 CHAPTER I People and parliament ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................9 CHAPTER II Information and influence .......................................................................................................................................................................................................24
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U11623970 Scheduling
    .._r • r • ,. ' • ,.,__JJ ACTION ----eel( I • ,j) COPY ) _, C,/, t ..., RECEIVED Unofficial Translation AUG 31 20'5 I 5'- o::;-b ~(o EOSG/CENTRA_L_ _, 31 August 2015 Excellency It gives me pleasure to extend to Your Excellency, on behalf of the Arab Parliament, our sincere thanks and appreciation. I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the important role the United Nations plays in achieving peace, stability, development and prosperity for all countries of the world, and commend your leadership and contributions in this regard. Excellency, Addressing today's global challenges require enhanced cooperation and coordination among regional and international organizations, including the growing threat of terrorist organizations that threaten peace and stability, especially in the Arab region. The Arab Parliament is keen to enhance its communication with various / regional and international organizations to exchange views on these challenges, and in this regard, I am pleased to share with Your Excellency the views of the Arab peoples regarding the following pressing issues: · - - - · - Terrorism: The Arab Parliament condemns extremism and terrorism in all their forms. Extremism and terrorism have no connection to the tolerant teachings of Islam, which calls for achieving peace for all peoples and countries of the world. The Arab Parliament also believes that the activities of terrorist organizations, most notably ISIS, are threatening the security and stability of the Arab States as well as rest of the world. Collective action is required to confront this threat. In this context, the Arab Parliament supports the efforts made by the international coalition against ISIS. Page 1 of 5 Palestine: The Arab Parliament believes that the Palestinian issue is the core of the conflict in the Middle East, and settlement of this issue is the right approach to achieve peace in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian Political Science Review Vol. XXI, No. 1 2021
    Romanian Political Science Review vol. XXI, no. 1 2021 The end of the Cold War, and the extinction of communism both as an ideology and a practice of government, not only have made possible an unparalleled experiment in building a democratic order in Central and Eastern Europe, but have opened up a most extraordinary intellectual opportunity: to understand, compare and eventually appraise what had previously been neither understandable nor comparable. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review was established in the realization that the problems and concerns of both new and old democracies are beginning to converge. The journal fosters the work of the first generations of Romanian political scientists permeated by a sense of critical engagement with European and American intellectual and political traditions that inspired and explained the modern notions of democracy, pluralism, political liberty, individual freedom, and civil rights. Believing that ideas do matter, the Editors share a common commitment as intellectuals and scholars to try to shed light on the major political problems facing Romania, a country that has recently undergone unprecedented political and social changes. They think of Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review as a challenge and a mandate to be involved in scholarly issues of fundamental importance, related not only to the democratization of Romanian polity and politics, to the “great transformation” that is taking place in Central and Eastern Europe, but also to the make-over of the assumptions and prospects of their discipline. They hope to be joined in by those scholars in other countries who feel that the demise of communism calls for a new political science able to reassess the very foundations of democratic ideals and procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe
    Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe Issued by the EP Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments N° 13 - November 2016 Quality of legislation stemming from the EU On 19 September 2016, the Italian Senate submitted a request to the ECPRD network concerning the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. This request was an opportunity for National Parliaments to exchange best practices on how to ensure the quality of legislation with specific regard to transposition, implementation and enforcement of EU law. From the 21 answers provided by National Parliaments it is clear that transposition and implementation of EU Law is highly unlikely to require special attention. While almost all of them are using legislative guidelines and procedures for guaranteeing high standard of general law-making, only a few have felt the need to establish special mechanisms to ensure the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. The use of legislative guidelines and procedures; the main way to ensure the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. The use of legislative guidelines and procedures appears to be the most common way for National Parliaments to ensure the quality of legislation, also the legislation stemming from the EU. It allows for good linguistic coherence in the national languages while enhancing the standardization of the law. For example, in the case of Austria, the Federal Chancellery has published specific “Legistische Richtlinien”. In Spain, the instrument used is the Regulation Guidelines adopted in the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 22 July 2005. Both Italian Chambers use Joint Guidelines on drafting of national legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional & Parliamentary Information
    UNION INTERPARLEMENTAIRE INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION CCoonnssttiittuuttiioonnaall && PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy IInnffoorrmmaattiioonn Half-yearly Review of the Association of Secretaries General of Parliaments Preparations in Parliament for Climate Change Conference 22 in Marrakech (Abdelouahed KHOUJA, Morocco) National Assembly organizations for legislative support and strengthening the expertise of their staff members (WOO Yoon-keun, Republic of Korea) The role of Parliamentary Committee on Government Assurances in making the executive accountable (Shumsher SHERIFF, India) The role of the House Steering Committee in managing the Order of Business in sittings of the Indonesian House of Representatives (Dr Winantuningtyastiti SWASANANY, Indonesia) Constitutional reform and Parliament in Algeria (Bachir SLIMANI, Algeria) The 2016 impeachment of the Brazilian President (Luiz Fernando BANDEIRA DE MELLO, Brazil) Supporting an inclusive Parliament (Eric JANSE, Canada) The role of Parliament in international negotiations (General debate) The Lok Sabha secretariat and its journey towards a paperless office (Anoop MISHRA, India) The experience of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies on Open Parliament (Antonio CARVALHO E SILVA NETO) Web TV – improving the score on Parliamentary transparency (José Manuel ARAÚJO, Portugal) Deepening democracy through public participation: an overview of the South African Parliament’s public participation model (Gengezi MGIDLANA, South Africa) The failed coup attempt in Turkey on 15 July 2016 (Mehmet Ali KUMBUZOGLU)
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence: the Role of National Parliaments in the European Union
    EUROPEAN UNION SELECT COMMITTEE The Role of National Parliaments in the European Union Oral and Written evidence Contents Dr Gavin Barrett, University College Dublin—Written evidence .................................................. 4 Professor Dr iur. Hermann-Josef Blanke, University of Erfurt, Germany—Written evidence . 7 Mr Mladen Cherveniakov, Chairman of the Committee on European Affairs and Oversight of the European Funds, National Assembly of Bulgaria—Written evidence ................................... 13 Mr Carlo Casini MEP and Mr Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez MEP, Vice-President, European Parliament—(QQ 125-136) ................................................................................................................... 15 Sonia Piedrafita, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS)—Written evidence ................... 16 Charles Grant, Director, Centre for European Reform, and Mats Persson, Director, Open Europe—Oral evidence (QQ 1-17) ..................................................................................................... 23 Dr iur Patricia Conlan, Member, Institute for the Study of Knowledge in Society, University of Limerick, Ireland—Written evidence ............................................................................................. 41 Dr Ian Cooper, University of Oslo—Written evidence ................................................................. 56 Dr Richard Corbett, Member of the Cabinet of the President, European Council—Written evidence .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Year in Elections, 2013: the World's Flawed and Failed Contests
    The Year in Elections, 2013: The World's Flawed and Failed Contests The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Norris, Pippa, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martinez i Coma. 2014. The Year in Elections 2013: The World's Flawed and Failed Contests. The Electoral Integrity Project. Published Version http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11744445 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 THE WORLD’S FLAWED AND FAILED CONTESTS Pippa Norris, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martínez i Coma February 2014 THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 WWW. ELECTORALINTEGRITYPROJECT.COM The Electoral Integrity Project Department of Government and International Relations Merewether Building, HO4 University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Phone: +61(2) 9351 6041 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com Copyright © Pippa Norris, Ferran Martínez i Coma, and Richard W. Frank 2014. All rights reserved. Photo credits Cover photo: ‘Ballot for national election.’ by Daniel Littlewood, http://www.flickr.com/photos/daniellittlewood/413339945. Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 6 and 18: ‘Ballot sections are separated for counting.’ by Brittany Danisch, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bdanisch/6084970163/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 8: ‘Women in Pakistan wait to vote’ by DFID - UK Department for International Development, http://www.flickr.com/photos/dfid/8735821208/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook .Human Rights
    YEARBOOK ON . HUMAN RIGHTS .FOR 1980 UNI:rED NATIONS New York, 1988 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publica­ tion do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, ter­ ritory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its fron­ tiers or boundaries. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.85.XIV.8 ISBN 92-1-154055-0 ISSN 025}-6519 04500P CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION " .. .. • xxi .Part I NATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS SECTION A. STATES ARGENTINA A. Condemnation ofracial segregation and apartheid. .. ..... ..... .. ..... .. ... 3 B. Promotion of understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations,racial and ethnic groups : ;......... 3 AUSTRALIA Introduction: general legal framework............................................. 5 A. Elimination of racial discrimination: development and protection of certain racial groups or-individuals belonging to them 6 B. Right to life.......................................................................... 6 C.- Protection against cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment 7 D. Prohibition ofincitement to discrimination, hostility or violence 8 E. Equal protection ofthe law...................................................... 8 F.' Rights of persons convicted ofserious criminal offences.................. 9 G. Right to an effective remedy..................................................... 9 H. Right ofeveryone charged with a penal offence
    [Show full text]
  • Factiva RTF Display Format
    Mauritanians Doubt Existence of CIA Prisons in Their Country 525 words 9 July 2007 Voice of America Press Releases and Documents English CY Copyright (c) 2007 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. VOA English Service DATELINE: Dakar Many Mauritanians says they do not believe claims made by an American journalist, and denied by their government, that the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency maintains secret interrogation cells in their country. Many also say they do not support military cooperation with the United States. Naomi Schwarz has more from VOA's West Africa bureau in Dakar. The affair began with a tiny mention in a long article in an American magazine, The New Yorker. The author says a senior intelligence official, unnamed, told him the United States had opened a new detainee center in Mauritania in late 2005 to house and interrogate terrorism suspects. The claim has been reprinted in Mauritanian media. It has caused a huge reaction there. Local journalist Salem Bokari says some people believe the claims, but the vast majority is extremely skeptical. But he says people want a government investigation to find out whether or not they are true. On Friday, before the National Assembly, Mauritania's justice minister formally denied the existence of any secret U.S. prisons in the country. The government has said its relationship with the U.S. military is limited to training and information sharing. Bokari says most Mauritanians hope the relationship stays minimal. Page 1 © 2007 Factiva, Inc. All rights reserved. He says Mauritanians do not support the government of President George Bush, because they feel he has not done much for the third world and for Muslims around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliaments and Legislatures Series Samuel C. Patterson
    PARLIAMENTS AND LEGISLATURES SERIES SAMUEL C. PATTERSON GENERAL ADVISORY EDITOR Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government EDITED BY SHAUN BOWLER, DAVID M. FARRELL, AND RICHARD S. KATZ OHI O STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS COLUMBUS Copyright © 1999 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Party discipline and parliamentary government / edited by Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz. p. cm. — (Parliaments and legislatures series) Based on papers presented at a workshop which was part of the European Consortium for Political Research's joint sessions in France in 1995. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8142-0796-0 (cl: alk. paper). — ISBN 0-8142-5000-9 (pa : alk. paper) 1. Party discipline—Europe, Western. 2. Political parties—Europe, Western. 3. Legislative bodies—Europe, Western. I. Bowler, Shaun, 1958- . II. Farrell, David M., 1960- . III. Katz, Richard S. IV. European Consortium for Political Research. V. Series. JN94.A979P376 1998 328.3/75/ 094—dc21 98-11722 CIP Text design by Nighthawk Design. Type set in Times New Roman by Graphic Composition, Inc. Printed by Bookcrafters, Inc.. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992. 98765432 1 Contents Foreword vii Preface ix Part I: Theories and Definitions 1 Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments 3 Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz 2 How Political Parties Emerged from the Primeval Slime: Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and the Formation of Governments 23 Michael Laver and Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Act on the Autonomy of Åland (1991/1144)
    Act on the Autonomy of Åland (1991/1144) The war of 1808-09 resulted in Sweden being forced to relinquish Finland and the Åland Islands to Russia, whereby Swedish-speaking Åland became part of the Grand Duchy of Finland. When Finland gained its independence, the Ålanders began to hope for reunion with Sweden. Consequently the Parliament of Finland adopted an Autonomy Act for Åland in 1920. At first the Ålanders refused to accept it, and the question of Åland's status was referred to the League of Nations. In June 1921 the Council of the League of Nations reached a decision that Finland should receive sovereignty over the Åland Islands. Finland undertook to guarantee the population of Åland its Swedish language, culture and local customs. The Council of the League of Nations also prescribed that an international agreement should be made confirming the demilitarization of the Ålands Islands from 1856 and expanding it to include neutralization. The Autonomy Act was supplemented in conformity with the decisions of the Council of the League of Nations, and the Ålanders started applying the Act. The first election to the Åland Parliament was held in 1922. The Autonomy Act from 1920 soon proved inadequate and was replaced in 1951 by another Act, which also became outdated. After almost 20 years of preparations the present Act on the Autonomy of Åland has been passed by the Parliament of Finland in constitutional order and with assent of the Åland Parliament. The Act entered into force on 1 January 1993. Please note: This is an unofficial translation.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210106111314445 Gohmert V Pence Stay Appl Signed.Pdf
    No. __A__________ In the Supreme Court of the United States LOUIE GOHMERT, TYLER BOWYER, NANCY COTTLE, JAKE HOFFMAN, ANTHONY KERN, JAMES R. LAMON, SAM MOORHEAD, ROBERT MONTGOMERY, LORAINE PELLEGRINO, GREG SAFSTEN, KELLI WARD AND MICHAEL WARD, Applicants, v. THE HONORABLE MICHAEL R. PENCE, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY. Respondent. EMERGENCY APPLICATION TO THE HONORABLE SAMUEL A. ALITO AS CIRCUIT JUSTICE FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT FOR ADMINISTRATIVE STAY AND INTERIM RELIEF PENDING RESOLUTION OF A TIMELY FILED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI William L. Sessions Sidney Powell* Texas Bar No. 18041500 Texas Bar No. 16209700 SESSIONS & ASSOCIATES, PLLC SIDNEY POWELL, P.C. 14591 North Dallas Parkway, Suite 400 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1100 Dallas, TX 75254 Dallas, TX 72519 Tel: (214) 217-8855 Tel: (214) 628-9514 Fax: (214) 723-5346 Fax: (214) 628-9505 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Lawrence J. Joseph Howard Kleinhendler DC Bar #464777 NY Bar No. 2657120 LAW OFFICE OF LAWRENCE J. JOSEPH HOWARD KLEINHENDLER ESQUIRE 1250 Connecticut Av NW, Ste 700 369 Lexington Ave., 12th Floor Washington, DC 20036 New York, New York 10017 Tel: (202) 355-9452 Tel: (917) 793-1188 Fax: (202) 318-2254 Fax: (732) 901-0832 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Counsel for Applicants * Counsel of Record PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Applicants (plaintiffs-appellants below) are U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-1), Tyler Bowyer, Nancy Cottle, Jake Hoffman, Anthony Kern, James R. Lamon, Sam Moorhead, Robert Montgomery, Loraine Pellegrino, Greg Safsten, Kelli Ward, and Michael Ward. Respondent (defendant-appellee below) is the Honorable Michael R.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Parliaments Visited
    3 Notes on parliaments visited Parliaments studied 3.1 This chapter provides a brief overview of the parliaments studied during the program in order to provide a context for the observations in Chapter 2. The notes are from the perspective of the committee’s interests and do not attempt to provide an overview of the parliaments themselves. There is obviously much more that could be said about each of the parliaments visited, but such comments would not reflect the experience provided by the study program. 3.2 As noted in paragraph 1.6 above, the committee was able to visit, observe and have discussions at the House of Commons and House of Lords in London, the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh, the Tynwald in Douglas, (Isle of Man), the National Assembly for Wales in Cardiff and the French National Assembly in Paris. The notes on these assemblies reflect information provided during discussions as well as documents provided by our hosts. 3.3 Three main factors influenced the decision to visit the four parliaments in the United Kingdom and one in France: a desire to compare practices and procedures with other parliaments sharing Westminster origins (The House of Commons, House of Lords, Scottish Parliament and National Assembly for Wales); an interest in learning how quite different parliamentary traditions address issues relevant to all legislatures, including scrutinising the Executive, use of parliamentary committees, communicating with the 34 STUDY PROGRAM 2006 public, procedures for conducting formal votes, how parliaments adapt themselves to societal changes (the Tynwald and the French National Assembly in addition to the parliaments in Britain); and time constraints imposed by the need to slot the visit into part of the Easter break (returning in time for the Budget sittings) and the sitting patterns of other parliaments.
    [Show full text]