DOCSLIB.ORG

Constitutional & Parliamentary Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNION INTERPARLEMENTAIRE INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION CCoonnssttiittuuttiioonnaall && PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy IInnffoorrmmaattiioonn Half-yearly Review of the Association of Secretaries General of Parliaments Preparations in Parliament for Climate Change Conference 22 in Marrakech (Abdelouahed KHOUJA, Morocco) National Assembly organizations for legislative support and strengthening the expertise of their staff members (WOO Yoon-keun, Republic of Korea) The role of Parliamentary Committee on Government Assurances in making the executive accountable (Shumsher SHERIFF, India) The role of the House Steering Committee in managing the Order of Business in sittings of the Indonesian House of Representatives (Dr Winantuningtyastiti SWASANANY, Indonesia) Constitutional reform and Parliament in Algeria (Bachir SLIMANI, Algeria) The 2016 impeachment of the Brazilian President (Luiz Fernando BANDEIRA DE MELLO, Brazil) Supporting an inclusive Parliament (Eric JANSE, Canada) The role of Parliament in international negotiations (General debate) The Lok Sabha secretariat and its journey towards a paperless office (Anoop MISHRA, India) The experience of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies on Open Parliament (Antonio CARVALHO E SILVA NETO) Web TV – improving the score on Parliamentary transparency (José Manuel ARAÚJO, Portugal) Deepening democracy through public participation: an overview of the South African Parliament’s public participation model (Gengezi MGIDLANA, South Africa) The failed coup attempt in Turkey on 15 July 2016 (Mehmet Ali KUMBUZOGLU) External versus internal drivers: Parliamentary reforms and development (Amjed Pervez MALIK, Pakistan) Training for participants in, and persons supporting, parliamentary proceedings (General Debate) The Swedish Parliament and the European Union: creating the best possible opportunities for influence at international level (Claes MÅRTENSSON, Sweden) Status of enhancement of powers of a regional parliament: evidence from the ECOWAS Parliament (Dr Nelson MAGBAGBEOLA, ECOWAS Parliament) The 20th anniversary of the Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic (Jiři UKLEIN, Czech Republic) Review of the ASGP / 66th year / No 212 / Geneva, 24 – 26 October 2016 ASSOCIATION DES SECRETAIRES ASSOCIATION OF SECRETARIES- GENERAUX DES PARLEMENTS GENERAL OF PARLIAMENTS UNION INTERPARLEMENTAIRE INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION MINUTES OF THE AUTUMN SESSION GENEVA 24 – 26 OCTOBER 2016 1 2 INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION Aims The Inter-Parliamentary Union, whose international Statute is outlined in a Headquarters Agreement drawn up with the Swiss federal authorities, is the only world-wide organisation of Parliaments. The aim of the Inter-Parliamentary Union is to promote personal contacts between members of all Parliaments and to unite them in common action to secure and maintain the full participation of their respective States in the firm establishment and development of representative institutions and in the advancement of the work of international peace and cooperation, particularly by supporting the objectives of the United Nations. In pursuance of this objective, the Union makes known its views on all international problems suitable for settlement by parliamentary action and puts forward suggestions for the development of parliamentary assemblies so as to improve the working of those institutions and increase their prestige. Membership of the Union Please refer to IPU site (http://www.ipu.org). Structure The organs of the Union are: 1. The Inter-Parliamentary Conference, which meets twice a year; 2. The Inter-Parliamentary Council, composed of two members of each affiliated Group; 3. The Executive Committee, composed of twelve members elected by the Conference, as well as of the Council President acting as ex officio President; 4. Secretariat of the Union, which is the international secretariat of the Organisation, the headquarters being located at: Inter-Parliamentary Union 5, chemin du Pommier Case postale 330 CH-1218 Le Grand Saconnex Genève (Suisse) Official Publication The Union’s official organ is the Inter-Parliamentary Bulletin, which appears quarterly in both English and French. The publication is indispensable in keeping posted on the activities of the Organisation. Subscription can be placed with the Union’s secretariat in Geneva. 3 ASSOCIATION OF SECRETARIES GENERAL OF PARLIAMENTS Minutes of the Autumn Session 2016 Geneva 24 – 26 October 2016 List of attendance MEMBERS PRESENT NAME COUNTRY Mr Rahimullah GHALIB Afghanistan Mr Bachir SLIMANI Algeria Mr Mohamed Drissi DADA Algeria Mr Pedro AGOSTINHO DE NERI Angola Ms Claressa SURTEES Australia Mr Abdulla ALDOSERI Bahrain Dr Md. Abdur Rob HOWLADER Bangladesh Mr Gert van der BIESEN Belgium Mr Thomas DASSI Benin Mr Sangay DUBA Bhutan Mr Chencho TSHERING Bhutan Mr Luiz Fernando BANDEIRA DE Brazil MELLO Mr Ivan SLAVCHOV Bulgaria Mr Renovat NIYONZIMA Burundi Mr Marc RWABAHUNGU Burundi 4 NAME COUNTRY Mr OUM Sarith Cambodia Mr SRUN Dara Cambodia Mr Michel MEVA'A M'EBOUTOU Cameroon Mr Victor YÉNÉ OSSOMBA Cameroon Mr Mario LABBE Chile Mr Miguel LANDEROS PERKIC Chile Mr David BYAZA-SANDA LUTALA Congo (Democratic Republic of) Mr Jean NGUVULU KHOJI Congo (Democratic Republic of) Ms Vassiliki ANASTASSIADOU Cyprus Mr Jiři UKLEIN Czech Republic Mr Petr KYNŠTETR Czech Republic Mr Ahmad Saad EL-DIN MUHAMED Egypt Mr Victorino Nka OBIANG MAYE Equatorial Guinea Ms Maria ALAJŎE Estonia Mr Negus LEMMA GEBRE Ethiopia Ms Jeanette EMBERSON Fiji Mr Christophe PALLEZ France Mr Zurab MARAKVELIDZE Georgia Dr Ulrich SCHÖLER Germany Mr Emmanuel ANYIMADU Ghana Mr José Carlos RODRIGUES DA Guinea Bissau FONSECA Mr Helgi BERNÓDUSSON Iceland Mr Shumsher K. SHERIFF India 5 NAME COUNTRY Mr Anoop MISHRA India Dr Winantuningtyas Titi SWASANANY Indonesia Dr Sabah Jumaah ALBAWI Iraq Mrs Yardena MELLER-HOROVITZ Israel Mr Hamad GHRAIR Jordan Mr Jeremiah M. NYEGENYE Kenya Mr Justin N. BUNDI Kenya Ms Eunice GICHANGI Kenya Mr WOO Yoon-keun Korea (Republic of) Mr Allam Ali Jaafer AL-KANDARI Kuwait Mr Abdymanap KUTUSHEV Kyrgyzstan Mr Adnan DAHER Lebanon Mr Claude FRIESEISEN Luxembourg Mr William BEFOUROUACK Madagascar Mr Henry H. NJOLOMOLE Malawi Mr Ahmed MOHAMED Maldives Mr Modibo SIDIBE Mali Mr Tsedev TSOLMON Mongolia Mr Kyaw SOE Myanmar Mrs Emilia Ndinelao MKUSA Namibia Mrs Lydia KANDETU Namibia Mr Geert Jan A. HAMILTON Netherlands 6 NAME COUNTRY Mr Harke HEIDA Netherlands Mr Mohammed Ataba SANI-OMOLORI Nigeria Dr Khalid Salim AL-SAIDI Oman Mr Amjed Pervez MALIK Pakistan Mr Abdul Jabbar ALI Pakistan Mr Ibrahim KHRISHI Palestine Mr Artemio A. ADASA Philippines Mr Lutgardo B. BARBO Philippines Ms Agnieszka KACZMARSKA Poland Mr José Manuel ARAÚJO Portugal Mr Fahad ALKHAYAREEN Qatar Ms Cristina IONESCU Romania Mr Sergey MARTYNOV Russian Federation Mr Sosthène CYITATIRE Rwanda Mr Domingos José TRINDADE BOA Sao Tomé and Principe MORTE Mr Baye Niass CISSÉ Senegal Mrs Svetislava BULAJIĆ Serbia Mr Manuel CAVERO Spain Mr Dhammika DASANAYAKE Sri Lanka Mr Gengezi MGIDLANA South Africa Mr Masibulele XASO South Africa Mr Alalla Said LORO South Sudan Mr Abdelgadir ABDALLA Sudan KHALAFALLA 7 NAME COUNTRY Mr Mohamed YAGOUB Sudan Ms Ruth DE WINDT Suriname Mr Claes MÅRTENSSON Sweden Mr Philippe SCHWAB Switzerland Dr Ghazi ABBAS Syrian Arab Republic Mrs La-Or PUTORNJAI Thailand Mrs Chollada KUNKLOY Thailand Mr Mateus XIMENES BELO Timor Leste Mr Fademba Madakome WAGUENA Togo Mr Mehmet Ali KUMBUZOĞLU Turkey Ms Jane LUBOWA KIBIRIGE Uganda Mr Paul GAMUSI WABWIRE Uganda Dr José Pedro MONTERO Uruguay Mrs Doris Katai Katebe MWINGA Zambia Mr Roy NGULUBE Zambia ASSOCIATE MEMBERS Mr Wojciech SAWICKI Council of Europe Dr Nelson MAGBAGBEOLA ECOWAS Parliament Mr Said MOKADEM Maghreb Consultative Council Mr Sergey STRELCHENKO Union of Belarus & the Russian Federation 8 SUBSTITUTES Mr Antonio NETO (for Mr Lúcio Brazil LOPES) Mr José VARANDA (for Ms Ilana Brazil TROMBKA) Mr Eric JANSE (for Mr Marc BOSC) Canada Mr Eric TAVERNIER (for Mr France Jean-Louis HERIN) Mr Yasuo KURATA (for Mr Japan Takeshi NAKAMURA) Mr Jun NIIMI (for Mr Shinji Japan MUKO-ONO) Ms Irena MIJANOVIĆ (for Mr Montenegro Siniša STANKOVIĆ) Mrs Agata KARWOWSKA- Poland SOKOŁOWSKA (for Mr Jakub KOWALSKI) Mr Paul EVANS (for Mr David United Kingdom NATZLER) Mr Jake VAUGHAN (for Mr David United Kingdom BEAMISH) Mr LE Bo Linh (for Mr NGUYEN Hanh Vietnam Phuc) ALSO PRESENT Mr HOK Bunly Cambodia Ms Fotini TSOUNI Greece Mr Yassin MOHAMMED Ethiopia Ms Warsiti ALFIAH Indonesia Mrs JULIASIH Indonesia 9 Mr Nunu Nugraha KHUSWARA Indonesia Mr Dimyati SUDJA Indonesia Ms Catia FABI Italy Mr Mosito LELIMO Lesotho Mr Lkamsuren GONGORSUREN Mongolia Mr Kitti SAEREEPRAYOON Thailand Ms Kanjanat SIRIWONG Thailand Ms Lilia MESQUITA Timor Leste Mme Christine VERGER European Parliament APOLOGIES Mr David ELDER Australia Mrs Barbara DITHAPO Botswana Mr Gali Massa HAROU Chad Mr Michel MOREAU France Dr Georg KLEEMANN Germany Dr Ute RETTLER Germany Dr Horst RISSE Germany Mr Satoru GOHARA Japan Ms Nataša KOMNENIĆ Montenegro 10 Mr Siniša STANKOVIĆ Montenegro Mr Najib EL KHADI Morocco Mrs Atibaedya WARARAT Thailand Mr Klaus WELLE European Parliament 11 12 Table of contents MINUTES OF THE AUTUMN SESSION ...................................................................... 1 List of attendance ........................................................................................................... 4 FIRST SITTING ............................................................................................................ 16 Monday 24 October 2016 (morning) ...................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Senate of Pakistan.CDR

    Senate of Pakistan.CDR

    Role, Functions & Procedures SENATE OF PAKISTAN A Publication of the Senate Secretariat Parliament House Islamabad First Published :2003 Second Edition :2006 Third Edition : 2009 Fourth Edition : 2012 This document has been published with the assistance of SDPD, the Parliamentary Development Program of UNDP. CONTENTS Preface to the Fourth Edition i Parliamentary Terms iii Chapter I INTRODUCTION 01 Chapter II HOUSE AND ITS MEMBERSHIP 07 Chapter III HOUSE PROCEDURE 13 Chapter IV LEGISLATION 19 Chapter V COMMITTEES 39 Chapter VI AMENITIES TO MEMBERS 45 Chapter VII LIBRARY, RESEARCH AND AUTOMATION 51 Chapter VIII THE SECRETARIAT 57 Chapter IX PARLIAMENT BUILDING AND FACILITIES 69 Chapter X INTER PARLIAMENTARY RELATIONS 77 Chapter XI PRESS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS 87 APPENDICES I Parliamentary Customs 93 II Excerpts from the Constitution 97 III Constitutional History of Pakistan 120 IV Heads of State, Government and Legislatures 128 V Federal and Concurrent Legislative Lists Constitution of Pakistan Fourth Schedule 136 VI The Members of Pakistan (Salaries and Allowance) Act, 1974 144 PREFACE The manual, containing information about the relevant Constitutional Provisions, Rules of Procedure and various Statues as well as an overview of structure and functions of the Senate Secretariat has proved to be useful document for understanding the working of the Senate. The utility of manual has increased manifold due to sizeable increase in the total membership of Senate including seventeen reserved seat of lady senators, especially when half of the total membership is elected afresh after every three years. The primary objective of the manual is to compile frequently used parliamentary terms and related information in one document for the benefit of present and new members of the Senate.
  • A/HRC/38/25 General Assembly

    A/HRC/38/25 General Assembly

    United Nations A/HRC/38/25 General Assembly Distr.: General 17 May 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-eighth session 18 June–6 July 2018 Agenda items 2 and 5 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Human rights bodies and mechanisms Contribution of parliaments to the work of the Human Rights Council and its universal periodic review Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights* Summary The present report is submitted pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 35/29, in which the Council requested the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to prepare a study, in close cooperation with the Inter-Parliamentary Union and in consultation with States, United Nations agencies and other relevant stakeholders, on how to promote and enhance synergies between parliaments and the work of the Human Rights Council and its universal periodic review, and to present it to the Council at its thirty-eighth session, in order to provide States and other relevant stakeholders with elements that could serve as orientation to strengthen their interaction towards the effective promotion and protection of human rights. The present report focuses on the role of parliaments in the field of human rights and contains an analysis of responses to a questionnaire for parliaments sent by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to Member States, United Nations agencies and other stakeholders through a note verbale dated 16 November 2017, pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 35/29.
  • On the Eve of the V Caspian Summit in Astana

    On the Eve of the V Caspian Summit in Astana

    20.09.2016-26.09.2016 • No: 82 ON THE EVE OF THE V CASPIAN SUMMIT IN ASTANA Current geopolitical situation in the Caspian Caspian states’ Deputy Ministers of Foreign Caspian Five could manage to revert to the region clearly demonstrates the necessity for Affairs held in Baku in February 2003. issue only in the four-year period, in particu- searching a mutually acceptable solution Nevertheless, it took the littoral states 5 years lar, during the IV Caspian Summit held in regarding both establishment of the new legal to arrange the II Caspian Summit in Tehran on Astrakhan on September 29, 2014. The issue status and determination of the regime of use October 16, 2007. This time, the discussion was resolved by adopting a 19-point final of the Caspian Sea. For more than two dec- on prospects for multilateral cooperation and communique. According to this communique, ades, the littoral countries have been trying to the legal status of the Caspian Sea was held in the littoral countries would extend their adopt a five-party document regulating legal a constructive atmosphere. As a result, the national sovereignty out 15 nautical miles off obligations for the parties in maintaining parties adopted a 25-point joint declaration, their respective coasts, with exclusive fishing rights to use waters above the seabed, the which touched upon several issues such as in 10 nautical mile areas. Besides, at the end seabed, the subsoil, and the airspace above the navigation, transportation, security, etc. The of the Summit, the Agreement on the conser- Caspian Sea. Improved political dialog among parties unanimously agreed that the littoral vation and rational use of marine biological the regional states is one of the crucial pre- states would neither use their armed forces resources, the Agreement on cooperation in conditions for the successful implementation against each other nor allow any other state to the field of prevention and liquidation of of normative regulations.
  • An Analysis of Bicameralism As a Viable Legislative

    An Analysis of Bicameralism As a Viable Legislative

    AN ANALYSIS OF BICAMERALISM AS A VIABLE LEGISLATIVE SYSTEM IN PAKISTAN Aminah Gilani Abstract: As a common perception, bicameralism is considered mandatory asset to Federal form of government, while contrary to this perception, the data from April 2014 shows that approximately 41.5% of legislatures around the world practice bicameral legislatures, whereas in Europe alone 64.58% have been noted as unicameral legislatures. In this paper, the researcher reviews and analyzes many of the arguments made on behalf of bicameralism using the data accessible through secondary sources. In, Pakistan bicameralism has become a traditional practice endorsed and legitimized by the constitution of 1973, however, the evolutionary forces of political compulsions require a more experimental approach towards legislative practices in Pakistan. The theoretical model provided by Path-Dependency facilitates this research in understanding the dynamics that obstructs the way of deviation from traditional approach and legislative efficiency in Pakistan. This study is aimed at provoking a debate on more diverse and solution-based ideas towards governance in Pakistan, concluding that it is not the structure of a legislature that decides the prosperity of a state but its efficiency. Keywords: Bicameralism, Upper house, Parliament, Election, National Assembly, Federalism Introduction Senate- usually referred to as the upper house of the legislature is widely regarded as the fundamental pillar of the modern democratic political system. It is also the permanent house; therefore it maintains the continuity of the political process of the state. It is proclaimed as thesymbol of harmony and unanimity, because it is formed on the basis of uniform representation from the respective federating units in the state.
  • FWU Journal of Social Sciences, Special Issue, No.4, Winter 2017, 1-11

    FWU Journal of Social Sciences, Special Issue, No.4, Winter 2017, 1-11

    FWU Journal of Social Sciences, Special Issue, No.4, Winter 2017, 1-11 Empowering Ethnoregional Minorities and the Federal Bicameralism:Examining the Role of Senate in Pakistan Muhammad Mushtaq University of Gujrat Federations establish power-sharing instituions at the federal level to empower the minority groups. Federal bicameralism is a part of power-sharing mechanisms that promote the shared-rule through allocating equal represention to the minority groups/provinces in the Second Chamber of the Parliament. Though, the federal bicameralism has now become a norm in the contemporary federal experiences, its strength varies across cases. The Pakistani Federation had adopted bicameral legislature in the 1973 Constituion but owing to the parliamentary nature of system, the directly elected Lower House has played an unparalleled role in the legislative and oversight business of the Parliament. However, despite of its lesser role in the polity, the minority groups envision the Senate as a forum that empowers them at the federal level. What the findings about oversight functions of the Senate illustrate is that the Senators belonging to smaller provinces are more vigorous than the Punjabi Senators, by submitting more questions, adjournment motions and call attention motions in the house, which in many ways reflect a more nuanced territorial role of the Senate. Conversely, the voting patterns and party discipline in the House lessen the territorial role of the Senate. But, as the smaller units have a larger voice in the House and the Senate is asserting for greater role, it is more likely that it would dispense more meaningful role in the years ahead.
  • RIGHTS at RISK

    RIGHTS at RISK

    RIGHTS at RISK Time for Action Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Chapter 4: Anti-Rights Actors 4 www.oursplatform.org 72 RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Chapter 4: Anti-Rights Actors Chapter 4: CitizenGo Anti-Rights Actors – Naureen Shameem AWID Mission and History ounded in August 2013 and headquartered Fin Spain,221 CitizenGo is an anti-rights platform active in multiple regions worldwide. It describes itself as a “community of active citizens who work together, using online petitions and action alerts as a resource, to defend and promote life, family and liberty.”222 It also claims that it works to ensure respect for “human dignity and individuals’ rights.”223 United Families Ordo Iuris, International Poland Center for World St. Basil the Istoki Great Family and Endowment Congress of Charitable Fund, Russia Foundation, Human Rights Families Russia (C-Fam) The International Youth Alliance Coalition Russian Defending Orthodox Freedom Church Anti-Rights (ADF) Human Life Actors Across International Heritage Foundation, USA FamilyPolicy, Russia the Globe Group of Friends of the and their vast web Family of connections Organization Family Watch of Islamic International Cooperation Anti-rights actors engage in tactical (OIC) alliance building across lines of nationality, religion, and issue, creating a transnational network of state and non-state actors undermining rights related to gender and sexuality. This El Yunque, Mexico visual represents only a small portion Vox party, The Vatican World Youth Spain of the global anti-rights lobby.
  • Representing Different Constituencies: Electoral Rules in Bicameral Systems in Latin America and Their Impact on Political Representation

    Representing Different Constituencies: Electoral Rules in Bicameral Systems in Latin America and Their Impact on Political Representation

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Nolte, Detlef; Sánchez, Francisco Working Paper Representing Different Constituencies: Electoral Rules in Bicameral Systems in Latin America and Their Impact on Political Representation GIGA Working Papers, No. 11 Provided in Cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Suggested Citation: Nolte, Detlef; Sánchez, Francisco (2005) : Representing Different Constituencies: Electoral Rules in Bicameral Systems in Latin America and Their Impact on Political Representation, GIGA Working Papers, No. 11, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/182554 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten,
  • Federalism, Bicameralism, and Institutional Change: General Trends and One Case-Study*

    Federalism, Bicameralism, and Institutional Change: General Trends and One Case-Study*

    brazilianpoliticalsciencereview ARTICLE Federalism, Bicameralism, and Institutional Change: General Trends and One Case-study* Marta Arretche University of São Paulo (USP), Brazil The article distinguishes federal states from bicameralism and mechanisms of territorial representation in order to examine the association of each with institutional change in 32 countries by using constitutional amendments as a proxy. It reveals that bicameralism tends to be a better predictor of constitutional stability than federalism. All of the bicameral cases that are associated with high rates of constitutional amendment are also federal states, including Brazil, India, Austria, and Malaysia. In order to explore the mechanisms explaining this unexpected outcome, the article also examines the voting behavior of Brazilian senators constitutional amendments proposals (CAPs). It shows that the Brazilian Senate is a partisan Chamber. The article concludes that regional influence over institutional change can be substantially reduced, even under symmetrical bicameralism in which the Senate acts as a second veto arena, when party discipline prevails over the cohesion of regional representation. Keywords: Federalism; Bicameralism; Senate; Institutional change; Brazil. well-established proposition in the institutional literature argues that federal Astates tend to take a slow reform path. Among other typical federal institutions, the second legislative body (the Senate) common to federal systems (Lijphart 1999; Stepan * The Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa no Estado
  • 20210106111314445 Gohmert V Pence Stay Appl Signed.Pdf

    20210106111314445 Gohmert V Pence Stay Appl Signed.Pdf

    No. __A__________ In the Supreme Court of the United States LOUIE GOHMERT, TYLER BOWYER, NANCY COTTLE, JAKE HOFFMAN, ANTHONY KERN, JAMES R. LAMON, SAM MOORHEAD, ROBERT MONTGOMERY, LORAINE PELLEGRINO, GREG SAFSTEN, KELLI WARD AND MICHAEL WARD, Applicants, v. THE HONORABLE MICHAEL R. PENCE, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY. Respondent. EMERGENCY APPLICATION TO THE HONORABLE SAMUEL A. ALITO AS CIRCUIT JUSTICE FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT FOR ADMINISTRATIVE STAY AND INTERIM RELIEF PENDING RESOLUTION OF A TIMELY FILED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI William L. Sessions Sidney Powell* Texas Bar No. 18041500 Texas Bar No. 16209700 SESSIONS & ASSOCIATES, PLLC SIDNEY POWELL, P.C. 14591 North Dallas Parkway, Suite 400 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1100 Dallas, TX 75254 Dallas, TX 72519 Tel: (214) 217-8855 Tel: (214) 628-9514 Fax: (214) 723-5346 Fax: (214) 628-9505 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Lawrence J. Joseph Howard Kleinhendler DC Bar #464777 NY Bar No. 2657120 LAW OFFICE OF LAWRENCE J. JOSEPH HOWARD KLEINHENDLER ESQUIRE 1250 Connecticut Av NW, Ste 700 369 Lexington Ave., 12th Floor Washington, DC 20036 New York, New York 10017 Tel: (202) 355-9452 Tel: (917) 793-1188 Fax: (202) 318-2254 Fax: (732) 901-0832 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Counsel for Applicants * Counsel of Record PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Applicants (plaintiffs-appellants below) are U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-1), Tyler Bowyer, Nancy Cottle, Jake Hoffman, Anthony Kern, James R. Lamon, Sam Moorhead, Robert Montgomery, Loraine Pellegrino, Greg Safsten, Kelli Ward, and Michael Ward. Respondent (defendant-appellee below) is the Honorable Michael R.
  • Brasilia and Sao Paulo), 2 April - 5 April 2013

    Brasilia and Sao Paulo), 2 April - 5 April 2013

    Committee on Foreign Affairs The Secretariat 8 May 2013 OFFICIAL VISIT OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS TO BRAZIL (Brasilia and Sao Paulo), 2 April - 5 April 2013 MISSION REPORT MAIN FINDINGS Strengthening dialogue with the Brazilian authorities should one of the priorities of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) in the context of the EU strategic partnership and the EU-Brazil joint action plan (2012-2014). There are currently more than 30 on-going dialogues under the EU-BR strategic partnership. A Civil Society Forum and a Business Forum take place every year, back to back with EU- BR Summitt. Yet, a true regular and structured dialogue between the EP and the Brazilian Congress is still missing. Visits of MEPs are numerous but still often ad-hoc and unbalanced with BR visits to Europe. A Parliamentary Forum that could meet before Summits could be a useful tool to structure this dialogue and to improve the EU-BR partnership. In reply to the interest shown by both the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate to structure better their dialogue with the European Parliament, reflected also in the Brazil-EU Joint Action Plan for 2012-2014 the AFET delegation urged both houses to come up with a joint initiative and promised that it would be met favourable in the European Parliament. The meetings held with governmental representatives confirmed their commitment, announced at the CELAC Summit in January, to submit a negotiating offer on market access regarding the EU- Mercosul Agreement by the end of the year with due account taken of the electoral deadlines of some key players (Paraguay, Venezuela) and the impact of the last economic crisis (Argentina).
  • Assessing Brazil's Political Institutions

    Assessing Brazil's Political Institutions

    Comparative Political Studies Volume 39 Number 6 August 2006 759-786 © 2006 Sage Publications Compared to What? 10.1177/0010414006287895 http://cps.sagepub.com hosted at Assessing Brazil’s http://online.sagepub.com Political Institutions Leslie Elliott Armijo Portland State University, Oregon Philippe Faucher Magdalena Dembinska Université de Montréal, Canada A rich and plausible academic literature has delineated reasons to believe Brazil’s democratic political institutions—including electoral rules, the polit- ical party system, federalism, and the rules of legislative procedure—are suboptimal from the viewpoints of democratic representativeness and policy- making effectiveness. The authors concur that specific peculiarities of Brazilian political institutions likely complicate the process of solving societal collec- tive action dilemmas. Nonetheless, Brazil’s economic and social track record since redemocratization in the mid-1980s has been reasonably good in com- parative regional perspective. Perhaps Brazil’s informal political negotiating mechanisms, or even other less obvious institutional structures, provide suffi- cient countervailing influences to allow “governance” to proceed relatively smoothly despite the appearance of chaos and political dysfunction. Keywords: Brazil; democracy; political institutions; policy making, economic reform; developing countries any comparative political scientists and economists now emphasize Mthe incentives for “good governance” created by a country’s set of formal political rules. Though numerous scholars judge Brazil’s political institutions to be almost paradigmatically poorly designed, the country has adopted and implemented politically difficult economic reforms, suggest- ing an apparent puzzle. One’s view of Brazil also influences judgments Authors’ Note: We gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments of Vicente Palermo, Luiz Carlos Bresser Pereira, Javier Corrales, Peter Kingstone, Stephan Haggard, Adam Przeworski, James Caporaso, William C.
  • 1925 Congressional Reoord-Sen Ate 1945

    1925 Congressional Reoord-Sen Ate 1945

    1925 CONGRESSIONAL REOORD-SEN ATE 1945 By Mr. WYANT: A bill (H. R. 11699) granting an increase ance blll (S. 3218) ; to the Committee en the District of of pension to Elizabeth Clark; to the Committee on Invalld Columbia. Pensions. 3471. Also, petition of G. H. Martin and others, protesting Also, a bill (H. R. 11700) gran!ing an increase of pension against the Sunday observance bill· .( S" 3218) ; to the Com· to Mary L. Deemet ; to the Oomm1ttee on Invalid Pensions. mittee on the District of Columbia. By Mr. KNUTSON: Resolution (H. Res. 405) to pay to Walter C. Neilson $1,500 for extra and expert services to the Committee on Pensions by detail from the Bureau of Pensions ; SENATE to the Committee on Accounts. FRIDAY, January 16, 1925 PETITIONS, ETC. (Legislative day of Thursday, Jatntu.a1"1J 15, 1!125) Under clause 1 of Rule XXII, petitions and papers were laid The Senate met in open executive session at 12 o'clock on the Clerk's· desk and referred as follows: meridian, on the expiration of the recess. 3456. By the SPEAKER (by request) : Petition of Federation The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Ohair lays before the of Citizens' Associations of the District of Columbia, asking for Senate the treaty with Cuba. a more definite proportionate contribution by the Federal Gov­ l\.lt. CURTIS. M.r. President, I suggest the absence of a ernment and the District of Columbia in appropriations for the quorum. maintenance, upkeep, and development of the Federal territory; The PRESIDENT pro temp01·e. The Clerk will call the to the Committee on the District of Columbia.