RIGHTS at RISK

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RIGHTS at RISK RIGHTS at RISK Time for Action Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Chapter 4: Anti-Rights Actors 4 www.oursplatform.org 72 RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Chapter 4: Anti-Rights Actors Chapter 4: CitizenGo Anti-Rights Actors – Naureen Shameem AWID Mission and History ounded in August 2013 and headquartered Fin Spain,221 CitizenGo is an anti-rights platform active in multiple regions worldwide. It describes itself as a “community of active citizens who work together, using online petitions and action alerts as a resource, to defend and promote life, family and liberty.”222 It also claims that it works to ensure respect for “human dignity and individuals’ rights.”223 United Families Ordo Iuris, International Poland Center for World St. Basil the Istoki Great Family and Endowment Congress of Charitable Fund, Russia Foundation, Human Rights Families Russia (C-Fam) The International Youth Alliance Coalition Russian Defending Orthodox Freedom Church Anti-Rights (ADF) Human Life Actors Across International Heritage Foundation, USA FamilyPolicy, Russia the Globe Group of Friends of the and their vast web Family of connections Organization Family Watch of Islamic International Cooperation Anti-rights actors engage in tactical (OIC) alliance building across lines of nationality, religion, and issue, creating a transnational network of state and non-state actors undermining rights related to gender and sexuality. This El Yunque, Mexico visual represents only a small portion Vox party, The Vatican World Youth Spain of the global anti-rights lobby. Alliance Holy See oursplatform.org CitizenGo HazteOir, Spain www.oursplatform.org 73 RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Chapter 4: Anti-Rights Actors According to CitizenGo, its core aim is to streets of Madrid – against a Spanish bill to foster citizen participation and it describes liberalize abortion laws.230 The group’s full name the internet and information technology as on its web site reads, “Make yourself heard, vital tools to achieve this goal.224 victims of the gender ideology.” This underlines the common stance of both organizations. The organization – avowedly “working from a 225 Christian perspective” – calls for respect for CITIZENGO IS INTIMATELY the right to life “from the moment of conception LINKED TO HAZTEOIR, A to its natural end”; the right to religious freedom; the right to marriage “understood as SPANISH ORGANIZATION the union between one man and one woman”; the right to educate one’s own children; and Notably, the Spanish Ministry of the Interior the right to work and to “economic initiative withdrew HazteOir’s declaration of public and the ownership of private property.”226 interest – its charity status first instituted in May 2013 – in February 2019231 after the Spanish CitizenGo is intimately linked to HazteOir, government ruled that the organization had a Spanish organization founded in 2001 by taken actions that had had the “effect of Ignacio Arsuaga, the President of CitizenGo. denigrating or undervaluing other conceptions They share a common founder, address, about the family, gender identity, childhood multiple board members, and tactics – with education” and that could be considered HazteOir more frequently working on the “attacks against certain people, groups national level, and CitizenGo transnationally. and entities.”232 Among other examples, the Arsuaga, a lawyer, was drawn into internet verdict referred to one of HazteOir’s many advocacy in the 1990s, including during his anti-rights campaigns – a bus touring Spain time at Fordham Law School in New York City. featuring a portrait of Adolf Hitler wearing a There he “became familiar with the American cap with a “feminist symbol” and the hashtag [US] grassroots movements and studied #StopFeminazis, alongside the slogan “repeal specifically their lobbying activities and the the gender laws.”233 tools they used for citizen involvement in politics and the public arena.”227 He was Budget, Board Members, and Size inspired by MoveOn.org to create HazteOir CitizenGo’s budget in 2018 and 2019 was 228 and CitizenGo. around $2.6 – 2.7 million USD. In both years, the largest portion of the organization’s budget HazteOir became particularly visible in 2010 was spent on campaigns. with the group’s well-publicized “Right to Life”229 campaign and mobilization – bringing hundreds of thousands of protestors to the www.oursplatform.org 74 RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Chapter 4: Anti-Rights Actors Year Revenue (USD) Expenses (USD) and president), Blanca Escobar, Luca Volonte, 2018 $2,658,071.20234 $2,947,072.29235 Brian Brown, Gualberto Garcia, Alexey Komov, 248 2019 $2,709,525236 $2,649,216.68237 Alejandro Bermudez and Carlos Polo, while the CEO of the organization is Alvaro Zulueta.249 CitizenGo functions as a membership The majority are well-networked within anti- platform and claims to have over 9 million rights circles and organizations worldwide, as members.238 It is largely funded by online described below. donations from its members, estimated at tens of thousands of Euros per month.239 AMONG CITIZENGO AND HAZTEOIR’S Among CitizenGo and HazteOir’s donors DONORS ARE EXECUTIVES OF are executives of companies such as IBM, COMPANIES SUCH AS IBM, EULEN, 240 Eulen, and Nestle, alongside billionaire AND NESTLE Esther Koplowitz and the founder of El Corte Inglés, the biggest department store group in Europe, Isidoro Álvarez.241 While Thematic Focus CitizenGo frames its donation model as “small CitizenGo hosts campaigns on popular themes donations” from individual members, sources in the anti-rights universe, with a particular indicate the amount donated by Eulen was interest in abortion (employing a misleading 20,000 Euros, while those of Koplowitz and “right to life” discourse250); surrogacy; freedom Alvarez each amounted to 10,000 Euros.242 of religion;251 “the family”;252 education During an investigation by openDemocracy, (particularly comprehensive sex education,253 founder Ignacio Arsuaga reportedly told an homeschooling and “parents’ rights”254); and undercover reporter that Patrick Slim, son of anti-LGBTQI activities. the Mexican oligarch Carlos Slim, donated 40,000 Euros to CitizenGo.243 The same Abortion investigation reported that a senior Vox CitizenGo and HazteOir have a significant official compared CitizenGo to a “Super emphasis on undermining reproductive 244 PAC” for the party, Arsuaga also talked justice, with abortion as a central to the undercover reporter about how to get preoccupation. The platform has hosted 245 around campaign finance laws. online petitions and offline actions and campaigns to attack rights and access to HazteOir has approximately 40 employees and abortion in a number of countries – including 246 50 volunteers, while CitizenGo has multiple Spain, Italy, Malawi, Kenya, Nigeria, Mexico country and regional liaisons and employees, – and in global multilateral spaces, such such as Ann Kioko, Campaigns Director as the UN’s Commission on the Status of 247 for CitizenGo Africa. CitizenGo’s board Women (CSW);255 the UN’s Commission on members include Ignacio Arsuaga (founder www.oursplatform.org 75 RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Chapter 4: Anti-Rights Actors Population and Development;256 and the Notably, CitizenGo and other ultra- Human Rights Committee.257 conservative actors attempt to appropriate and redefine religious freedom in a way that CITIZENGO AND HAZTEOIR HAVE directly and radically contradicts the purpose A SIGNIFICANT EMPHASIS ON of the right – they suggest that the right to freedom of religion is intended to protect a UNDERMINING REPRODUCTIVE religion rather than those persons who are JUSTICE, WITH ABORTION AS A free to hold or not hold different religious CENTRAL PREOCCUPATION beliefs. They then go on to suggest that religious liberty is threatened and undermined Surrogacy by outside forces and other human rights CitizenGo also works to erode reproductive (particularly those related to gender, sexuality rights and to push its monolithic and and reproduction). heteronormative conception of “the traditional family” by focusing on the practice of CITIZENGO ATTEMPT TO surrogacy, which it describes as “offensive APPROPRIATE AND REDEFINE to human dignity,” and “rob[bing] children of RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN A WAY a natural family.”258 The platform’s petitions THAT RADICALLY CONTRADICTS similarly advocate against access to in vitro THE PURPOSE OF THE RIGHT fertilization (IVF) – or “test tube babies”259 – and access to contraceptives.260 CitizenGo has hosted petitions and actions on this In this way the anti-rights narrative around theme in several countries, including Kenya, freedom of religion aims to co-opt human Canada, and Cambodia.261 rights language, to shift the subject of rights, endowing already powerful institutions, Religious Freedom states, and ideologies with even more power. By flipping this discourse, anti-rights actors Employing another common anti-rights aim to shift the right to religious freedom from discourse, CitizenGo appeals to freedom a “shield against religious imposition” into a of religion and describes it as under threat. “sword of right-wing Christian hegemony.”263 As discussed in the previous OURs
Recommended publications
  • Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy
    The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada Abstract This article explores how Donald Trump capitalized on the right's decades-long, carefully choreographed and well-financed campaign against political correctness in relation to the broader strategy of 'cultural conservatism.' It provides an historical overview of various iterations of this campaign, discusses the mainstream media's complicity in promulgating conservative talking points about higher education at the height of the 1990s 'culture wars,' examines the reconfigured anti- PC/pro-free speech crusade of recent years, its contemporary currency in the Trump era and the implications for academia and educational policy. Keywords: political correctness, culture wars, free speech, cultural conservatism, critical pedagogy Introduction More than two years after Donald Trump's ascendancy to the White House, post-mortems of the 2016 American election continue to explore the factors that propelled him to office. Some have pointed to the spread of right-wing populism in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that culminated in Brexit in Europe and Trump's victory (Kagarlitsky, 2017; Tufts & Thomas, 2017) while Fuchs (2018) lays bare the deleterious role of social media in facilitating the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. and elsewhere. Other 69 | P a g e The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy explanations refer to deep-rooted misogyny that worked against Hillary Clinton (Wilz, 2016), a backlash against Barack Obama, sedimented racism and the demonization of diversity as a public good (Major, Blodorn and Blascovich, 2016; Shafer, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Annual Report
    The New Conservative Flagship ANNUAL REPORT 2020A About American Compass Table of Contents Our Mission To restore an economic consensus that emphasizes the importance of family, community, and industry to the nation’s liberty and prosperity: 1 Founder’s Letter 4 REORIENTING POLITICAL FOCUS from growth for its own sake to widely shared economic development that sustains vital social institutions. SETTING A COURSE for a country in which families can achieve self- sufficiency, contribute productively to their communities, and prepare the next 2 Year in Review 10 generation for the same. Conservative Flagship 12 HELPING POLICYMAKERS NAVIGATE the limitations that markets and government each face in promoting the general welfare and the nation’s security. Changing the Debate 14 Our Activities Creating Community 16 AFFILIATION. Providing opportunities for people who share its mission to The Commons 18 build relationships, collaborate, and communicate their views to the broader political community. Our Growing Influence 20 DELIBERATION. Supporting research and discussion that advances understanding of economic and social conditions and tradeoffs through study of history, analysis of data, elaboration of theory, and development of policy 3 Our Work 21 proposals. ENGAGEMENT. Initiating and facilitating public debate to challenge existing Rebooting the American System 22 orthodoxy, confront the best arguments of its defenders, and force scrutiny of unexamined assumptions and unconsidered consequences. Coin-Flip Capitalism 26 Our Principles Moving the Chains 30 AMERICAN COMPASS strives to embody the principles and practices of a healthy democratic polity, combining intellectual combat with personal civility. Corporate Actual Responsibility 34 We welcome converts to our vision and value disagreement amongst A Seat at the Table 38 our members.
    [Show full text]
  • FPC Disclosure Amicus Brief
    Nos. 19-251, 19-255 In The Supreme Court of the United States ____________ AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION, Petitioner, v. XAVIER BECCERA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Respondent, — and — THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER, Petitioner, v. XAVIER BECCERA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Respondent. ____________ On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ____________ Brief of Amici Curiae 24 Family Policy Organiza- tions Supporting Petitioners ____________ Anita Y. Milanovich Counsel of Record MILANOVICH LAW, PLLC 100 E. Broadway Street The Berkeley Room Butte, Montana 59701 Ph.: 406/589-6856 Email: aymilanovich@ milanovichlaw.com September 25, 2019 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Whether the exacting scrutiny this Court has long required of laws that abridge the freedoms of speech and association outside the election con- text—as called for by NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958), and its progeny— can be satisfied absent any showing that a blanket governmental demand for the individual identities and addresses of major donors to private nonprofit organizations is narrowly tailored to an asserted law-enforcement interest (Petitioner Americans for Prosperity Foundation). 2) Whether exacting scrutiny or strict scrutiny applies to disclosure requirements that burden nonelectoral, expressive association rights (Peti- tioner Thomas More Center). 3) Whether California’s disclosure requirement violates charities’ and their donors’ freedom of association and speech facially or as applied to the Law Center (Petitioner Thomas More Center). (i) TABLE OF CONTENTS Question Presented .................................................... i Table of Contents .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/38/25 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/38/25 General Assembly Distr.: General 17 May 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-eighth session 18 June–6 July 2018 Agenda items 2 and 5 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Human rights bodies and mechanisms Contribution of parliaments to the work of the Human Rights Council and its universal periodic review Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights* Summary The present report is submitted pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 35/29, in which the Council requested the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to prepare a study, in close cooperation with the Inter-Parliamentary Union and in consultation with States, United Nations agencies and other relevant stakeholders, on how to promote and enhance synergies between parliaments and the work of the Human Rights Council and its universal periodic review, and to present it to the Council at its thirty-eighth session, in order to provide States and other relevant stakeholders with elements that could serve as orientation to strengthen their interaction towards the effective promotion and protection of human rights. The present report focuses on the role of parliaments in the field of human rights and contains an analysis of responses to a questionnaire for parliaments sent by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to Member States, United Nations agencies and other stakeholders through a note verbale dated 16 November 2017, pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 35/29.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional & Parliamentary Information
    UNION INTERPARLEMENTAIRE INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION CCoonnssttiittuuttiioonnaall && PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy IInnffoorrmmaattiioonn Half-yearly Review of the Association of Secretaries General of Parliaments Preparations in Parliament for Climate Change Conference 22 in Marrakech (Abdelouahed KHOUJA, Morocco) National Assembly organizations for legislative support and strengthening the expertise of their staff members (WOO Yoon-keun, Republic of Korea) The role of Parliamentary Committee on Government Assurances in making the executive accountable (Shumsher SHERIFF, India) The role of the House Steering Committee in managing the Order of Business in sittings of the Indonesian House of Representatives (Dr Winantuningtyastiti SWASANANY, Indonesia) Constitutional reform and Parliament in Algeria (Bachir SLIMANI, Algeria) The 2016 impeachment of the Brazilian President (Luiz Fernando BANDEIRA DE MELLO, Brazil) Supporting an inclusive Parliament (Eric JANSE, Canada) The role of Parliament in international negotiations (General debate) The Lok Sabha secretariat and its journey towards a paperless office (Anoop MISHRA, India) The experience of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies on Open Parliament (Antonio CARVALHO E SILVA NETO) Web TV – improving the score on Parliamentary transparency (José Manuel ARAÚJO, Portugal) Deepening democracy through public participation: an overview of the South African Parliament’s public participation model (Gengezi MGIDLANA, South Africa) The failed coup attempt in Turkey on 15 July 2016 (Mehmet Ali KUMBUZOGLU)
    [Show full text]
  • MANUFACTURING MORAL PANIC: Weaponizing Children to Undermine Gender Justice and Human Rights
    MANUFACTURING MORAL PANIC: Weaponizing Children to Undermine Gender Justice and Human Rights Research Team: Juliana Martínez, PhD; Ángela Duarte, MA; María Juliana Rojas, EdM and MA. Sentiido (Colombia) March 2021 The Elevate Children Funders Group is the leading global network of funders focused exclusively on the wellbeing and rights of children and youth. We focus on the most marginalized and vulnerable to abuse, neglect, exploitation, and violence. Global Philanthropy Project (GPP) is a collaboration of funders and philanthropic advisors working to expand global philanthropic support to advance the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) people in the Global1 South and East. TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary ...................................................................................... 4 Acronyms .................................................................................................. 4 Definitions ................................................................................................. 5 Letter from the Directors: ......................................................... 8 Executive Summary ................................................................... 10 Report Outline ..........................................................................................13 MOBILIZING A GENDER-RESTRICTIVE WORLDVIEW .... 14 The Making of the Contemporary Gender-Restrictive Movement ................................................... 18 Instrumentalizing Cultural Anxieties .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amicus Briefs in This Case
    NO. 16-111 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET. AL., Petitioners, v. COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION, ET. AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE 33 FAMILY POLICY ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS DAVID FRENCH Counsel of record Senior Fellow NATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE 215 Lexington Avenue 11th Floor New York, New York 10016 (931) 446-7572 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether applying Colorado’s public- accommodation law to compel artists to create expression that violates their sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the Free Speech or Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTION PRESENTED ......................................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ............................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................... 2 ARGUMENT .............................................................. 6 I. If Freedom of Conscience Can Survive the World’s Worst War, It Should Survive the Sexual Revolution. ............................................... 6 II. Creative Professionals and Corporations Consistently Exercise Their Rights under Barnette to Promote and Disassociate from Specific Values and Messages. .......................... 13 III. To Undermine Barnette Is To Cruelly Impoverish the Marketplace of Ideas. .............. 21 CONCLUSION ......................................................... 25 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases: Craig v. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Inc., 370 P.3d 272 (Colo. App. 2015) .................... 17-18 Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015) .................................. 12, 26 West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943) .................................... passim Other Authorities: Accessories: 42mm Pride Edition Woven Nylon, Apple, https://www.apple.com/ca/shop/ product/MQ4G2AM/A/42mm-pride-edition- woven-nylon (last visited Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinning Russia's 21St Century Wars
    Research Article This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative The RUSI Journal Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-NoDerivatives License (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Spinning Russia’s 21st Century Wars Zakhar Prilepin and his ‘Literary Spetsnaz’ Julie Fedor In this article, Julie Fedor examines contemporary Russian militarism through an introduction to one of its most high-profile representatives, the novelist, Chechen war veteran and media personality Zakhar Prilepin. She focuses on Prilepin’s commentary on war and Russian identity, locating his ideas within a broader strand of Russian neo-imperialism. he Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 brand of militarism that has come to pervade the and the war in the Donbas which began Russian media landscape, Prilepin warrants our T that same year have been accompanied by attention. Studying his career and output can help a remarkable drive to mobilise cultural production to illuminate the context and underpinnings of the in Russia in support of a new brand of state- domestic support for the official military doctrine sponsored militarism. Using a variety of media and policy that is more commonly the subject of platforms and reaching mass popular audiences, scholarship on Russian military and security affairs. a range of cultural celebrities – actors, writers, This article focuses on Prilepin’s commentary rock stars, tabloid war correspondents – have on the nature of war and Russian identity, locating played a key role in framing and shaping domestic his ideas within a broader strand of Russian perceptions of Russia’s 21st Century wars. Despite neo-imperialism in which war is claimed as a vital their prominence in Russian media space, their source of belonging, power and dignity.1 It shows activities have received surprisingly little scholarly how the notion of a special Russian relationship attention to date.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Eye, Summer 2015
    SUMMER 2015 The Public Eye When the Exception Is the Rule Christianity in the Religious Freedom Debates editor’s letter perspectives BY LInDsay BeyersTEIn THE PUBLIC EYE quarterly PUBLIsHER Tarso Luís Ramos Struggling to Get Church GUEsT EDIToR Kathryn Joyce Beyond the Hate Frame LAYoUT and State Right Jennifer Hall CoVER art Political Research Associates always strives to see both the trees and the forest: to go Asad Badat Whether it’s a spree killing, a vandalized mosque, or a beyond caricatures to provide fresh research and analysis on individual conservative bias attack on a queer teen, Americans are quick to chalk it PRInTInG activists and coalitions, but also to situate these actors in the larger infrastructure of Red Sun Press up to hate. The label “hate crime” invites us to blame over- the Right. The first piece in our Summer 2015 issue,“Beyond the Hate Frame” (page wrought individuals acting on extreme personal prejudice, EDIToRIAL BoARD , speaks to this ideal: an interview with Kay Whitlock and Michael Bronski, authors of 3) T.F. Charlton • Frederick Clarkson making it seem as if a small cadre of social deviants is our the new book Considering Hate, which explores how “the hate frame” obscures broader Alex DiBranco • Eric Ethington main obstacle to a peaceful society. In fact, such individu- issues of systemic violence. Kapya Kaoma • L. Cole Parke als are products of a society that endorses all kinds of vio- Tarso Luís Ramos • Spencer Sunshine lence against the very same groups who are targeted in hate As this issue is going to press, the Supreme Court has just announced its historic rul- Mariya Strauss crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2014 Newsletter
    Gerald R. Ford Presidential Foundation Newsletter September 2014, Issues 3 & 4 Annual Wreath Laying Ceremony At The Tomb Of President Gerald R. Ford On The 101st Anniversary Of His Birth July 14, 2014 Susan Ford Bales, Dick Ford and Vaden Bales place the Ford Family Wreath. On July 14, 2014 Secretary James A. Baker, III, Trustee of the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Foundation, participated in the Annual Wreath Laying Ceremony at the Tomb of President Gerald R. Ford. This year marked the 101st Birthday of the President. In addition to the Wreath Laying Ceremony, Secretary Baker unveiled a new granite marker at the Museum designed to assist the public visiting the Tomb of President Ford and First Lady Betty Ford. While at the Museum Secretary Baker also participated in a Ribbon Cutting Ceremony at the new Museum exhibit entitled “Taking the Seas: Rise of the American Aircraft Carrier”. Secretary Baker then presented the William E. Simon Lecture in Public Affairs to a capacity crowd during lunch at the Amway Grand Plaza Hotel. Secretary Baker was awarded the Col. Ralph W. Hauenstein Fellowship for his distinguished public service following the Simon Lecture presentation. Top Photo: Trustee Jim Baker and Foundation Chairman Red Cavaney admire the new granite marker near the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Museum. Middle Photo: Trustee Susan Ford Bales (left) and Vice Chairman Hank Meijer (right) present a bust of President Ford to Trustee Jim Baker following the Simon Lecture in Public Affairs. Bottom Photo: Trustee Susan Ford Bales is joined by Trustees of the Foundation in addition to Foundation Executive Director Joe Calvaruso, Library and Museum Director Elaine Didier, Museum Curator Don Holloway and Museum staff at the Ribbon Cutting Ceremony for the new Museum exhibit “Taking The Seas”.
    [Show full text]
  • Theparliamentarian
    TheParliamentarian Journal of the Parliaments of the Commonwealth 2015 | Issue Three XCVI | Price £13 Elections and Voting Reform PLUS Commonwealth Combatting Looking ahead to Millenium Development Electoral Networks by Terrorism in Nigeria CHOGM 2015 in Malta Goals Update: The fight the Commonwealth against TB Secretary-General PAGE 150 PAGE 200 PAGE 204 PAGE 206 The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) Shop CPA business card holders CPA ties CPA souvenirs are available for sale to Members and officials of CPA cufflinks Commonwealth Parliaments and Legislatures by CPA silver-plated contacting the photoframe CPA Secretariat by email: [email protected] or by post: CPA Secretariat, Suite 700, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA, United Kingdom. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) exists to connect, develop, promote and support Parliamentarians and their staff to identify benchmarks of good governance and implement the enduring values of the Commonwealth. Calendar of Forthcoming Events Confirmed at 24 August 2015 2015 September 2-5 September CPA and State University of New York (SUNY) Workshop for Constituency Development Funds – London, UK 9-12 September Asia Regional Association of Public Accounts Committees (ARAPAC) Annual Meeting - Kathmandu, Nepal 14-16 September Annual Forum of the CTO/ICTs and The Parliamentarian - Nairobi, Kenya 28 Sept to 3 October West Africa Association of Public Accounts Committees (WAAPAC) Annual Meeting and Community of Clerks Training - Lomé, Togo 30 Sept to 5 October CPA International
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Liberty
    S. HRG. 106-689 RELIGIOUS LIBERTY HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON ISSUES RELATING TO RELIGIOUS LIBERTY PROTECTION, AND FOCUS­ ING ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A RELIGIOUS PROTECTION MEASURE JUNE 23, AND SEPTEMBER 9, 1999 Serial No. J-106-35 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 67-066 CC WASHINGTON : 2000 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah, Chairman STROM THURMOND, South Carolina PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware JON KYL, Arizona HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin MIKE DEWINE, Ohio DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York BOB SMITH, New Hampshire MANUS COONEY, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Minority Chief Counsel (II) CONTENTS STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Hatch, Hon. Orrin G., U.S. Senator from the State of Utah 1, 65 Thurmond, Hon. Strom, U.S. Senator from the State of South Carolina 19 Kennedy, Hon. Edward M., U.S. Senator from the State of Massachusetts 20, 70 Leahy, Hon. Patrick J., U.S. Senator from the State of Vermont 27, 67 Feingold, Hon. Russell D., U.S. Senator from the State of Wisconsin 27, 70 CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF WITNESSES JUNE 23, 1999 Panel consisting of Steven T. McFarland, Center For Law and Religious Freedom, Christian Legal Society, Annandale, VA; Nathan J. Diament, director, Institute For Public Affairs, Union of Orthodox Jewish Congrega­ tions of America, Washington, DC; Manuel A.
    [Show full text]