UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Definition of Public Space in Republican Rome Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8zr398bq Author Russell, Amy Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Definition of Public Space in Republican Rome By Amy Russell A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology and the Designated Emphasis in Gender and Women’s Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Erich S. Gruen, Chair Professor Carlos F. Noreña Professor Mark Griffith Professor Andrew Wallace-Hadrill Spring 2011 © Copyright by Amy Russell 2011 All Rights Reserved Abstract The Definition of Public Space in Republican Rome by Amy Russell Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology and the Designated Emphasis in Gender and Women’s Studies Professor Erich S. Gruen, Chair This dissertation uses a combination of literary and archeological evidence to ask how Romans understood and defined public space in Rome during the Republic. The definition of concepts of ‘public’ and ‘private’ in Roman culture differed from that current in modern Western discourse, but just like modern definitions, it was ambiguous and manipulable. Taking public space as a starting-point offers new insights into the Roman concepts, and a behavioural approach, aided by insights from space syntax theory, allows for a partial reconstruction of the diversity of spatial experience in the city. Traditionally, lack of behavioural control has been associated with private space, but for the majority of the population, who were not householders, it was public spaces which were characterised by greater freedom of access and behaviour. Public space was not a monolith, but offered a variety of spatial experiences and was experienced differently by different groups. Moreover, just as the space of the Roman elite house was more ‘public’ than we might naively suspect, public space in the city of Rome was determined by and thoroughly saturated by the private. The Republican Forum Romanum incorporated domestic and commercial space as well as political space, which itself was never neutrally ‘public’ but always contested. The grand victory porticoes of the Campus Martius mark out sacred space but also space associated with an individual general, and their architecture and decoration increasingly mark them as semi-private, until eventually Pompey’s theatre-portico complex incorporates not only a curia but also his own house. We see attempts to exploit the ambiguities of existing discourses of public and private, creating spaces like victory complexes and basilicas. Although Latin uses publicus and privatus as a natural and exclusive pair, the terms were in fact contested even in ancient times, and very little space in Rome was entirely public or entirely private. 1 THE DEFINITION OF PUBLIC SPACE IN REPUBLICAN ROME CONTENTS Contents i List of Figures iii List of Abbreviations vii Acknowledgements viii 1. Introduction 1 The ‘spatial turn’ and scholarship on the ancient world 1 Defining ‘public’ and ‘private’ 4 Discovering Roman concepts 8 Public and private in action in the house 9 Spatial experience and behavioural approaches to defining ‘public’ and 13 ‘private’ Space syntax theory and archaeological approaches to defining the private 19 Status and control 22 2. Revisiting Public and Private in Republican Rome 25 Publicus, privatus and the Roman definition of space 25 Legal texts: publicus, privatus, sacer 26 Plautus: violence and control 28 Claiming public space: violence in the Pro Milone 31 Conclusion: a behavioural definition of ‘public’ space in the Roman world 37 Afterword: Vitruvius and public space in the age of Augustus 39 3. Public Space, Private Space and Political Space in the Forum Romanum 46 The public Forum 47 Communal control and political space 51 Individual control and political space 63 Between public and private: private patrons and political space 77 Conclusion: failures of control 82 4. Individual Claims to Public Space in Republican Victory Monument 85 Individual and community in the victory temple 86 The interplay of public, private and sacred in early political monuments 90 From individual dedications to complexes 92 Visual and spatial differentiation: the role of Greek art 94 1. Marcellus and the arrival of Greek art at Rome 94 i 2. Hercules Musarum as heterotopia 100 3. Metellus Macedonicus and the Granikos Monument 102 Conclusion: kings, generals, and the control of space 104 5. Controlling Space in Pompey’s Victory Complex 108 Archaeology and architecture 113 A unified victory complex 116 Physical control and theatrical surveillance 121 Spectacles of privacy 125 Political space in action in the unified complex 133 Conclusion 136 6. Conclusion 137 Figures 141 Bibliography 174 ii LIST OF FIGURES All figures are located at the end of the main text, p. 141-73 Figure 1.1. The view from the doorway of the House of the Wooden Partition, 141 Herculaneum Author’s photograph Figure 1.2. The view from the doorway of the House of Neptune and Amphitrite, 141 Herculaneum Author’s photograph Figure 1.3. The House of Neptune and Amphitrite, Herculaneum: plan 142 Clarke (1991) 251 Figure 1.4. View of nymphaeum from the triclinium of the House of Neptune and 142 Amphitrite Clarke (1991) pl. 19 Figure 1.5. The House of the Labyrinth, Pompeii 143 Hales (2003) 119 Figure 1.6. The House of Octavius Quarto, Pompeii 143 Hales (2003) 115 Figure 1.7. House of Octavius Quarto: view from Room f along the water feature 144 Author’s photograph Figure 1.8. Grahame’s access analysis of the House of the Labyrinth 145 Grahame (2000) 145 Figure 1.9. Grahame’s illustration of the concept of confinement 145 Grahame (1997) 148 Figure 1.10. Street plan of Pompeii 146 Laurence (2007) 4 Figure 1.11. Distribution of fauces in Region 6 146 Laurence (2007) 127 Figure 1.12. The Vicolo di Narciso with entrances numbered 147 Jones/Schoonhoven (2003) 129 Figure 1.13. View south along the Vicolo di Narciso 147 Jones/Schoonhoven (2003) 132 iii Figure 1.14. Patterns of original block layout in Region 1 148 Ciro Nappo (1997) 98 Figure 1.15. Typical early Region 1 row house with back garden 148 Ciro Nappo (1997) 100 Figure 1.16. Insula 1.11, showing most entrances along north and west side 149 Ciro Nappo (1997) Figure 3.1. The Forum Romanum and Sacra Via in the mid-second century BCE. 150 Wilson (2005) 128 fig. 1 Figure 3.2. The Forum Romanum in the mid-first century BCE. 151 CAH IX2 370 fig. 2 Figure 3.3. The Forum Romanum in the Augustan period 152 Giuliani/Verduchi (1987) Figure 3.4. The natural relief of the Forum basin 153 Ammermann (1990) 635 fig. 4 Figure 3.5. The area of the Comitium in the regal period 153 Carafa (1998) 119 fig. 80 Figure 3.6. The Republican Comitium in Coarelli’s reconstruction 154 Coarelli (1985) 23 fig. 5 Figure 3.7. The Basilica Aemilia, showing traces of older tabernae on a different 155 orientation Freyberger et al. (2007) fig. 5 Figure 3.8 Archaic houses on the Sacra Via 156 Carandini (2004) 93 Figure 3.9. The Forum at Cosa 157 Lackner (2009) 348 Figure 3.10. The Atrium Vestae in the second century BCE 158 Scott (2009) 19, 34 Figure 3.11. The Atrium Vestae in the first century BCE 159 Scott (2009) 36 Figure 3.12. Coin of L. Aemilius Paullus (RRC 419/3) 160 Freyberger et al. (2007) 500 iv Figure 3.13. The Imperial fora 161 Meneghini/Santangeli Valenzani (2007) 40. Drawing E. Bianchi – R. Meneghini Figure 4.1. Fifth-century double temples in the Area Sacra di Sant’Omobono 162 Coarelli (1988) 206; drawing G. Ioppolo Figure 4.2. Republican tempietti, Ostia 162 Rieger (2004) 56 Figure 4.3. Temple of Hercules Musarum on the Marble Plan 163 Carettoni et al. (1960) pl. 29, detail Figure 4.4. Temple of Hercules Musarum: reconstructions 164 Coarelli (1997a) 477, 479 Figure 4.5. Standing remains of Porticus Octaviae, successor to the Porticus Metelli 165 (author’s photographs) Figure 4.6. The Porticus Metelli in the second century BCE (reconstruction) with 165 temples of Juno Regina (L) and Jupiter Stator (R) Nünnerich-Asmus (1994) Abb. 19 Figure 4.7. Porticus Minucia, showing enclosure outside temple B in the Largo 166 Argentina Coarelli (1997a) 334 Figure 5.1. Theatre and portico of Pompey on the Campus Martius (restored plan) 167 Coarelli (1997a) 540 Figure 5.2. Aerial photograph of the area of Pompey’s complex 168 Google Earth (© 2010 Google, © 2011 Tele Atlas) Figure 5.3. Surviving substructures of the cavea: digital composite 168 The Pompey Project (http://www.pompey.cch.kcl.ac.uk/Site_Documentation.htm, last accessed 1 May 2011) Figure 5.4. The structures of the cavea as recorded by Packer 169 Packer/Burge/Gagliardo (2007) 513 (Drawing J. Burge) Figure 5.5. The structures of the cavea as recorded by Monterroso Checa 169 Monterroso Checa (2007) 136 Figure 5.6. The theatre and portico of Pompey on the Marble Plan 170 Carettoni et al. (1960) plate 32 v Figure 5.7. The theatre and portico in Gleason’s reconstructions: plan 171 Gleason (1994) 18 Figure 5.8. The theatre and portico in Gleason’s reconstructions: view from the 171 curia Gleason (1994) 22 Figure 5.9. Wall-painting from the villa at Boscoreale depicting a pierced scaenae 172 frons Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York: Anderson (1987-88) 23 Figure 5.10. Painted representation of a late Republican villa landscape 173 Wall-painting from the house of M.
Recommended publications
  • Pompey, the Great Husband
    Michael Jaffee Patterson Independent Project 2/1/13 Pompey, the Great Husband Abstract: Pompey the Great’s traditional narrative of one-dimensionally striving for power ignores the possibility of the affairs of his private life influencing the actions of his political career. This paper gives emphasis to Pompey’s familial relationships as a motivating factor beyond raw ambition to establish a non-teleological history to explain the events of his life. Most notably, Pompey’s opposition to the special command of the Lex Gabinia emphasizes the incompatibility for success in both the public and private life and Pompey’s preference for the later. Pompey’s disposition for devotion and care permeates the boundary between the public and private to reveal that the happenings of his life outside the forum defined his actions within. 1 “Pompey was free from almost every fault, unless it be considered one of the greatest faults for a man to chafe at seeing anyone his equal in dignity in a free state, the mistress of the world, where he should justly regard all citizens as his equals,” (Velleius Historiae Romanae 2.29.4). The annals of history have not been kind to Pompey. Characterized by the unbridled ambition attributed as his impetus for pursuing the civil war, Pompey is one of history’s most one-dimensional characters. This teleological explanation of Pompey’s history oversimplifies the entirety of his life as solely motivated by a desire to dominate the Roman state. However, a closer examination of the events surrounding the passage of the Lex Gabinia contradicts this traditional portrayal.
    [Show full text]
  • Succeeding Succession: Cosmic and Earthly Succession B.C.-17 A.D
    Publication of this volume has been made possiblej REPEAT PERFORMANCES in partj through the generous support and enduring vision of WARREN G. MOON. Ovidian Repetition and the Metamorphoses Edited by LAUREL FULKERSON and TIM STOVER THE UNIVE RSITY OF WI S CON SIN PRE SS The University of Wisconsin Press 1930 Monroe Street, 3rd Floor Madison, Wisconsin 53711-2059 Contents uwpress.wisc.edu 3 Henrietta Street, Covent Garden London WC2E SLU, United Kingdom eurospanbookstore.com Copyright © 2016 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System Preface Allrights reserved. Except in the case of brief quotations embedded in critical vii articles and reviews, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrievalsystem, transmitted in any format or by any means-digital, electronic, Introduction: Echoes of the Past 3 mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise-or conveyed via the LAUREL FULKERSON AND TIM STOVER Internetor a website without written permission of the University of Wisconsin Press. Rightsinquiries should be directed to rights@>uwpress.wisc.edu. 1 Nothing like the Sun: Repetition and Representation in Ovid's Phaethon Narrative 26 Printed in the United States of America ANDREW FELDHERR This book may be available in a digital edition. 2 Repeat after Me: The Loves ofVenus and Mars in Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ars amatoria 2 and Metamorphoses 4 47 BARBARA WElDEN BOYD Names: Fulkerson, Laurel, 1972- editor. 1 Stover, Tim, editor. Title: Repeat performances : Ovidian repetition and the Metamorphoses / 3 Ovid's Cycnus and Homer's Achilles Heel edited by Laurel Fulkerson and Tim Stover. PETER HESLIN Other titles: Wisconsin studies in classics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ides of March
    P19 www.aseasonofhappiness.com The Ides of March Hey Jules, don’t be afraid... Attributed to the Bard William Shakespeare, the time of year in this spotlight was destined to become a precursor of foreboding: “Beware the Ides of March,” a soothsayer said to Julius Caesar in the play. From another source the famous historical exchange went like this: Caesar (jokingly): The Ides of March are come. Seer: Aye, Caesar, but not gone. Picture the scene: the well-to-do swanning around in togas, slaves in tow; chariots running over plebs at random in the streets; centurians rolling dice; senators whispering and plotting overthrows behind closed doors while sharpening their daggers – this was ancient Rome on the 15th March 44 B.C. Jolly Julius was sauntering on his merry way to the Theatre of Pompey, blissfully unaware that he was soon to be the star of the show as he was stabbed by no less than 60 conspirators; including his former mate Brutus to whom he commented with his dying breath: “Et tu, Brute?” And so, the Ides, for Caesar at least, turned out to be the last and worst day of his life. Maybe as well as the bucket, he also kicked off a new trend, because it wasn’t always like that. Prior to Jules messing with it, the ancient Roman calendar was complicated. Rather than numbering days of the month from the first to the last, some bright spark decided it was better to count backwards. He was probably trying to prove he was smarter than the average Roman; seeing as he understood his own calculations, whereas it was doubtful many others could.
    [Show full text]
  • Domitian's Arae Incendii Neroniani in New Flavian Rome
    Rising from the Ashes: Domitian’s Arae Incendii Neroniani in New Flavian Rome Lea K. Cline In the August 1888 edition of the Notizie degli Scavi, profes- on a base of two steps; it is a long, solid rectangle, 6.25 m sors Guliermo Gatti and Rodolfo Lanciani announced the deep, 3.25 m wide, and 1.26 m high (lacking its crown). rediscovery of a Domitianic altar on the Quirinal hill during These dimensions make it the second largest public altar to the construction of the Casa Reale (Figures 1 and 2).1 This survive in the ancient capital. Built of travertine and revet- altar, found in situ on the southeast side of the Alta Semita ted in marble, this altar lacks sculptural decoration. Only its (an important northern thoroughfare) adjacent to the church inscription identifies it as an Ara Incendii Neroniani, an altar of San Andrea al Quirinale, was not unknown to scholars.2 erected in fulfillment of a vow made after the great fire of The site was discovered, but not excavated, in 1644 when Nero (A.D. 64).7 Pope Urban VIII (Maffeo Barberini) and Gianlorenzo Bernini Archaeological evidence attests to two other altars, laid the foundations of San Andrea al Quirinale; at that time, bearing identical inscriptions, excavated in the sixteenth the inscription was removed to the Vatican, and then the and seventeenth centuries; the Ara Incendii Neroniani found altar was essentially forgotten.3 Lanciani’s notes from May on the Quirinal was the last of the three to be discovered.8 22, 1889, describe a fairly intact structure—a travertine block Little is known of the two other altars; one, presumably altar with remnants of a marble base molding on two sides.4 found on the Vatican plain, was reportedly used as building Although the altar’s inscription was not in situ, Lanciani refers material for the basilica of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Waters of Rome Journal
    TIBER RIVER BRIDGES AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANCIENT CITY OF ROME Rabun Taylor [email protected] Introduction arly Rome is usually interpreted as a little ring of hilltop urban area, but also the everyday and long-term movements of E strongholds surrounding the valley that is today the Forum. populations. Much of the subsequent commentary is founded But Rome has also been, from the very beginnings, a riverside upon published research, both by myself and by others.2 community. No one doubts that the Tiber River introduced a Functionally, the bridges in Rome over the Tiber were commercial and strategic dimension to life in Rome: towns on of four types. A very few — perhaps only one permanent bridge navigable rivers, especially if they are near the river’s mouth, — were private or quasi-private, and served the purposes of enjoy obvious advantages. But access to and control of river their owners as well as the public. ThePons Agrippae, discussed traffic is only one aspect of riparian power and responsibility. below, may fall into this category; we are even told of a case in This was not just a river town; it presided over the junction of the late Republic in which a special bridge was built across the a river and a highway. Adding to its importance is the fact that Tiber in order to provide access to the Transtiberine tomb of the river was a political and military boundary between Etruria the deceased during the funeral.3 The second type (Pons Fabri- and Latium, two cultural domains, which in early times were cius, Pons Cestius, Pons Neronianus, Pons Aelius, Pons Aure- often at war.
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenal Commentary
    1 digressus, -us m. departure, separation. vetus, -eris, old, aged, ancient, of long-standing. confūsus, -a, -um, confused, disturbed. 2 vacuus, -a, -um, empty; carefree. sēdēs, -is f. seat; dwelling place, home. fīgō, -ere, fīxī, fīxum, to fix, fasten. Cumae, -ārum f.pl. Cumae, an ancient Greek city on the coast northwest of Naples. Note the locative case. 3 dēstinō (1) to make firm; resolve; aim at; intend. “he intends, as he says” - note the force of the subjunctive. 4 Baiae, a popular resort 6 miles along the coast from Cumae. amoenius, -a, -um, pleasant, charming, delightful. Read with secessus. 5 sēcessus, -us m. retirement, solitude, retreat. Prochyta, a small island off the coast of Misenum. praepōnō, -ere, -posuī, -positum, to place before; prefer. Subura, a busy and crowded district of Rome northeast of the Forum. 6 solus, -a, -um, alone, sole; lonely, solitary. 7 deterior, -ius, worse, inferior. The superlative is deterrimus. The positive is lacking. horreō, -ere, -uī, to bristle; shudder at, fear. incendium, -ī n. fire. lapsus, -ūs m. fall. 8 tectum, -ī n. roof; ceiling; house. adsiduus, -a, -um, persistent, incessant. 9 Augusto mense: an ablative of time when. Note the vicious humor of the climax. 10 raeda, -ae f. a traveling carriage. An ablative of means to be read with una. compōnō, -ere, -pōsuī, -positum, to bring, place, put together; collect; arrange, dispose. 11 substō, -āre, -stitī, to stand firm. veteres: The Capena Gate was one of the oldest in Rome. arcus, -ūs m. bow; rainbow; arch, vault. madidus, -a, -um, wet, moist; steeped. The Porta Capena lay under the Marcian Aquaduct.
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual Cleaning-Up of the City: from the Lupercalia to the Argei*
    RITUAL CLEANING-UP OF THE CITY: FROM THE LUPERCALIA TO THE ARGEI* This paper is not an analysis of the fine aspects of ritual, myth and ety- mology. I do not intend to guess the exact meaning of Luperci and Argei, or why the former sacrificed a dog and the latter were bound hand and foot. What I want to examine is the role of the festivals of the Lupercalia and the Argei in the functioning of the Roman community. The best-informed among ancient writers were convinced that these were purification cere- monies. I assume that the ancients knew what they were talking about and propose, first, to establish the nature of the ritual cleanliness of the city, and second, see by what techniques the two festivals achieved that goal. What, in the perception of the Romans themselves, normally made their city unclean? What were the ordinary, repetitive sources of pollution in pre-Imperial Rome, before the concept of the cura Urbis was refined? The answer to this is provided by taboos and restrictions on certain sub- stances, and also certain activities, in the City. First, there is a rule from the Twelve Tables with Cicero’s curiously anachronistic comment: «hominem mortuum», inquit lex in duodecim, «in urbe ne sepelito neve urito», credo vel propter ignis periculum (De leg. II 58). Secondly, we have the edict of the praetor L. Sentius C.f., known from three inscrip- tions dating from the beginning of the first century BC1: L. Sentius C. f. pr(aetor) de sen(atus) sent(entia) loca terminanda coer(avit).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Bernard, Seth G., "Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C." (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 492. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Abstract MEN AT WORK: PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION, LABOR, AND SOCIETY AT MID-REPUBLICAN ROME, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard C. Brian Rose, Supervisor of Dissertation This dissertation investigates how Rome organized and paid for the considerable amount of labor that went into the physical transformation of the Middle Republican city. In particular, it considers the role played by the cost of public construction in the socioeconomic history of the period, here defined as 390 to 168 B.C. During the Middle Republic period, Rome expanded its dominion first over Italy and then over the Mediterranean. As it developed into the political and economic capital of its world, the city itself went through transformative change, recognizable in a great deal of new public infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vestal Habit
    THE VESTAL HABIT Andrew B. Gallia* In her epochal study of the Vestal virgins, Mary Beard called attention to the ambiguous position of these priestesses in relation to the normative categories of gender in Roman society.1 Drawing on the insights of structural anthropology, she argued that this ambiguity was central to the Vestals’ sacredness. Essentially, her interpretation rests on the proposition that, by combining features relating to the status of unmarried daughters (virgines) with those of married women (matronae), the priestesses became in themselves vessels for the symbolic mediation between culturally opposed categories that Claude Lévi-Strauss, Mary Douglas, and others have identified as a central function of myth and ritual.2 Although the underlying observation about the peculiarity of the Vestals’ “sexual status” must ultimately be allowed to stand, more recent work on the inherent instability of categories of sex and gender suggests that we ought to revisit the problem of the priestesses’ ambiguity, paying closer attention to the socially contingent nature of its production.3 In this article, I will confine my discussion to an aspect of gender construction that Beard regarded as essential to establishing the matronal piece of the Vestals’ supposed interstitiality: * Published in Classical Philology 109.3 (2014). 1 Beard 1980. 2 Beard 1980, 23-4; cf. Lévi-Strauss 1955, 437-42; Douglas 1969, 163-70; Leach 1976, 34-6. 3 Butler 1990; Fausto Sterling 2000. For social-historical critiques of Beard’s original thesis, see Gardner 1986, 22-6; Cancik-Lindemaier 1990; Scardigli 2003; Gallia 2015. Note also the subsequent self-critique of Beard 1995, although this account is avowedly “not concerned with ‘how the facts fit’” (169).
    [Show full text]
  • Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G
    Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary ILDENHARD INGO GILDENHARD AND JOHN HENDERSON A dead boy (Pallas) and the death of a girl (Camilla) loom over the opening and the closing part of the eleventh book of the Aeneid. Following the savage slaughter in Aeneid 10, the AND book opens in a mournful mood as the warring parti es revisit yesterday’s killing fi elds to att end to their dead. One casualty in parti cular commands att enti on: Aeneas’ protégé H Pallas, killed and despoiled by Turnus in the previous book. His death plunges his father ENDERSON Evander and his surrogate father Aeneas into heart-rending despair – and helps set up the foundati onal act of sacrifi cial brutality that caps the poem, when Aeneas seeks to avenge Pallas by slaying Turnus in wrathful fury. Turnus’ departure from the living is prefi gured by that of his ally Camilla, a maiden schooled in the marti al arts, who sets the mold for warrior princesses such as Xena and Wonder Woman. In the fi nal third of Aeneid 11, she wreaks havoc not just on the batt lefi eld but on gender stereotypes and the conventi ons of the epic genre, before she too succumbs to a premature death. In the porti ons of the book selected for discussion here, Virgil off ers some of his most emoti ve (and disturbing) meditati ons on the tragic nature of human existence – but also knows how to lighten the mood with a bit of drag.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Companion to Age of Constantine.Pdf
    The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine offers students a com- prehensive one-volume introduction to this pivotal emperor and his times. Richly illustrated and designed as a readable survey accessible to all audiences, it also achieves a level of scholarly sophistication and a freshness of interpretation that will be welcomed by the experts. The volume is divided into five sections that examine political history, reli- gion, social and economic history, art, and foreign relations during the reign of Constantine, a ruler who gains in importance because he steered the Roman Empire on a course parallel with his own personal develop- ment. Each chapter examines the intimate interplay between emperor and empire and between a powerful personality and his world. Collec- tively, the chapters show how both were mutually affected in ways that shaped the world of late antiquity and even affect our own world today. Noel Lenski is Associate Professor of Classics at the University of Colorado, Boulder. A specialist in the history of late antiquity, he is the author of numerous articles on military, political, cultural, and social history and the monograph Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century ad. Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S Edited by Noel Lenski University of Colorado Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521818384 c Cambridge University Press 2006 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Stein Theater of Pompey.Pdf
    THE THEATER OF POMPEY: AN UNPRECEDENTED MONUMENT HERALDING THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF POMPEY THE GREAT Lesley Stein ART 103, Greco-Roman Art, Fall 2011 Instructor: Professor Catherine Turrill 2 When a man’s ambition and competitiveness are combined with military prowess and political savvy, a need for constant adulation and recognition inevitably arises within. In the case of the legendary Roman general and statesman, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, better known as Pompey the Great, that need was fulfilled with the construction of Rome’s first free-standing permanent stone theater: the Theater of Pompey (Fig. 1), c. 55 B.C. If not for Pompey’s outsized ego, this monumental architectural structure might never have been erected. Meant to convey a message of strength, success, and wealth, the Theater of Pompey was built to glorify the achievements of its patron on the battlefield and to win the public’s and the aristocracy’s favor. In a crafty move, Pompey crowned his massive theater complex with a temple dedicated to his favorite goddess, Venus Victrix, further appeasing any critics. This grandiose monument built by Pompey during the era of the late Republic, celebrated, publicized, and heralded his considerable military victories and, consequently became one of history’s most architecturally significant structures. Fig. 1. Theater of Pompey, 3D model, “The Blazeby Reconstructions.” Image: The Pompey Project, www.pompey.cch.kcl.ac.uk/index.htm. 3 Pompey was born in Rome on September 29, 106 B.C. The son of a Roman general, Pompey followed in his father’s footsteps, rising rapidly through the military ranks.
    [Show full text]