America by Air Content Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

America by Air Content Document America by Air Content Document Gallery #2 Working Title: America By Air Target Opening Date: 1/2021 Duration of Exhibition: permanent Size of Gallery: 12,112 sq. ft., ceiling height 50 ft. Gallery Location: NMB Gallery 102 Subject Areas: Technology, business, culture, power, and people Target Audience: General Target “Design-to” number: $4,289,689.00 Needed Services: Exhibition Design NASM Project Number: E-061-15-028 America by Air Exhibition #2 – America by Air Currently, The National Air and Space Museum (NASM) has an exhibit called “America by Air” in gallery 102. This gallery gives visitor a look into the progression of aviation in America. The Gallery is set up in different units. Each unit focuses on a different time period starting from the early days of flight to present day. This gallery houses many large commercial airplanes from the 20th century, but also models of airports, airport towers and the culture during this time period. Exhibition Space Gallery 102 has an open concept. It is surrounding on two side with glass (curtain wall and skylight). This gallery is approximately 12,000 square feet with a 50 ft. ceiling. All galleries will be delivered by the Revitalization project to the design team as black boxes with open ceilings and a lighting grid. The electrical and IT will be updated facilitating more cutting edge interactive and visitor experiences. Final electrical capacity and specific material finishes have not been defined and the contractor will be responsible to coordinate with the COTR the final black box details which are being developed. Contractor shall be responsible for verifying that they have the latest version of the Black Box description. Exhibition Scope The National Air and Space Museum seeks the services of talented and creative exhibit design professionals to assist in the updating of the existing America by Air exhibition. As part of the revitalization of NASM, “America by Air” will have many different portions updated. The exhibit will stay in gallery 102 but many of the artifacts will be removed and stored. This exhibition is deemed a “turn key” space in which the current overall look, feel, style and exhibition components will remain but be upgraded, refurbished, repaired and items replaced as required. “America by Air” is a very large exhibit in gallery 102 and needs a lot of work to be updated. In order to update everything most artifacts will be taken out and the structures will be redone. Work needs to be done on the exhibit while everything is taken out. Some of the areas are dated and require new graphics. The interactives also need to be looked at, updated and re-done in some cases. While it is anticipated that some of the exhibitry will remain in place (i.e. Ford Trimotor wall, Hangar) we have budgeted as if we are replacing with “new”. In certain instances where we can salvage components, they will be refurbished for the gallery re-installation. All of the cases will be re-furbished and re-installed for the new space. All of the cased artifacts will require removal for conservation and temporary storage. The artifacts that are anticipated to remain in place are the hanging aircraft (Pitcairn PA-5 Mailwing, Fairchild FC-2, Ford 5-AT Tri-Motor, Northrop Alpha, Boeing 247-D, Douglas DC-3) and one two large engines (Rolls Royce RB.211 and the General Electric CF6). A pre- inspection of each hanging artifact should occur. This inspection and light cleaning will provide us with any additional requirements that each object may require. These early determinations can better inform our timeline for any hanging aircraft removals and conservation work. While we expect that the Rolls Royce RB.211 and General Electric CF6 to remain in place, we have included the assembly and reinstallation, of these objects in the budget as well. The nose displays of the Airbus and the DC-7 will require external and internal work and will require transportation to UHC or receive contracted services to repaint and refurbish these object. From the NASM collection we plan to display a new aircraft, the J-1 Standard. This aircraft requires significant restoration. The current time estimate for the restoration is three years. Given this duration the work should begin in 2017 if installation prior to opening is desired. The material cost is provided for in the gallery budget and labor cost is identified in the program plan as a support activity. This exhibit does not require any artifact incoming loans or gifts. The interactives require updating. Some of the Mechanical interactives aren’t working properly and all of the Computer Interactives require upgrades. Some of the CI’s just need to be updated to the latest software and hardware specifications, but some of the other ones need to be redesigned to work better. All of the computer hardware will be replaced and many of the Computer Interactives (CI) will be updated. The Mechanical Interactives (MI) will also be fixed and upgraded as some of them are not working currently. Panels have been damaged or faded over the years and some could use redesigning to get the point across more clearly. The cases and lighting will be reused but the cases need to be updated and the lighting may be reconfigured. Some of the cases are also receive a lot dust inside or in some cases in between the glass and a panel which blocks some of the view. This may require some modification to prevent this in the future but the cases are currently planned to be refurbished and reused for the revitalized display. All of the Intro pylons require audio labels to make the audio buttons more obvious. Plex barriers will be added in certain areas to provide additional protection to the artifacts and to prevent visitors from touching some objects. This protection will be required especially when the J-1 is installed in the gallery. Our visitors have a tendency to leverage coins, etc from the balcony level onto our artifacts resting below on the first floor. Measures will need to be taken to provide this protection. Below is a representative list of some the items that require maintenance and redesign objectives: • Replace damaged laminate on pylon of exhibit introduction panel • Replace damaged text label on exhibit introduction panel • Replace carpet and set a new floor tile layout • Redo all flip panels in Wild Bill section with better hinge mechanism and custom high pressure laminate • Refurbish hut and areas around the hut • Liberty V-12 engine leaking on stand and floor of hut • Recreate working knee board map interactive to be more durable • Redo Travel Agent desktop so people cannot slide things under plex, seal edges of glass or create graphic tabletop • Redo flip damaged flip book “Airports of Tomorrow”, custom high pressure laminate • Interior and exterior of DC-7 needs thorough clean-up maintenance • Replace turn style on exiting DC-7 • Refurbish luggage pile • Refurbish exterior of airbus cockpit • Replace all speakers throughout gallery • Seal light attic in cases to eliminate dust • Add environmental monitoring and/or security to cases • Replace lighting in all cases, check lighting levels on all cases that face outside light • Upgrade family label materials to solid surface such as Corian Below is a representative list of some of the graphic items that require a redesign or touch up: • Delete "You Are Here" on graphic image collage of Exhibit Introduction Panel • Add audio description label under button of exhibit introduction panel • Use existing supports (on tops of unit 100 pylons to place J-1 where Jenny was supported, may need some modification and shifting of pylons • Add clear glass to 2nd floor balcony to protect J-1 airplane artifact • Create new labels for J-1 to replace Jenny labels • Redo hut mural with correct sepia tone color • Recreate working knee board map interactive to be more durable • Angle top of knee wall so it's not used as a bar during special events • Add new case wedge graphic to large model case on back side (airplane labels, photos) • Redo damaged graphic panel Visionary Reforms • Redo damaged graphic panel Airmail Scandal • Redo Travel Agent desktop so people cannot slide things under plex, seal edges of glass or create graphic tabletop • Redo flip damaged flip book “Airports of Tomorrow”, custom high pressure laminate • Redesign and replace damaged “Who’s Flying” flip panel with addition of Mickey Mouse on answer panel • Move Lucille Ball name down on “Flying Stars” wall mural so not as obvious • Add photo of Juan Trippe in case with globe (new wedge at bottom of case) • Replace match books (on loan) in "At Your Service" case, redesign graphic label • Add interior plex barrier to DC-7 seating area • Re-design mural in the back of "At Your Service" case to prevent reflection and dust buildup between case and mural • Add engine label to fill in empty space, right of 747 • Move railing out farther away from Rolls Royce engine, left of 747 to prevent people from touching it, will need to modify design of powder coated railing • Redo damaged graphic rail "Aviation Technology" • Change gold plating on piston engine interactive to aluminum • Update graphics for Price Master interactive • Add light shining into 747 lower door • Create new mural, both braille and text labels for 3D tactile models wall Below is a representative list of some of the updates required for the interactives: • All computer interactives will need to be digitized with updated software • Remake tea cup and saucer shake table so it shakes properly (2nd motor has failed), vitrine
Recommended publications
  • Report to the Legislature: Indoor Air Pollution in California
    California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board Report to the California Legislature INDOOR AIR POLLUTION IN CALIFORNIA A report submitted by: California Air Resources Board July, 2005 Pursuant to Health and Safety Code § 39930 (Assembly Bill 1173, Keeley, 2002) Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor Indoor Air Pollution in California July, 2005 ii Indoor Air Pollution in California July, 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared with the able and dedicated support from Jacqueline Cummins, Marisa Bolander, Jeania Delaney, Elizabeth Byers, and Heather Choi. We appreciate the valuable input received from the following groups: • Many government agency representatives who provided information and thoughtful comments on draft reports, especially Jed Waldman, Sandy McNeel, Janet Macher, Feng Tsai, and Elizabeth Katz, Department of Health Services; Richard Lam and Bob Blaisdell, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment; Deborah Gold and Bob Nakamura, Cal/OSHA; Bill Pennington and Bruce Maeda, California Energy Commission; Dana Papke and Kathy Frevert, California Integrated Waste Management Board; Randy Segawa, and Madeline Brattesani, Department of Pesticide Regulation; and many others. • Bill Fisk, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, for assistance in assessing the costs of indoor pollution. • Susan Lum, ARB, project website management, and Chris Jakober, for general technical assistance. • Stakeholders from the public and private sectors, who attended the public workshops and shared their experiences and suggestions
    [Show full text]
  • Civilian Involvement in the 1990-91 Gulf War Through the Civil Reserve Air Fleet Charles Imbriani
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2012 Civilian Involvement in the 1990-91 Gulf War Through the Civil Reserve Air Fleet Charles Imbriani Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE CIVILIAN INVOLVEMENT IN THE 1990-91 GULF WAR THROUGH THE CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET By CHARLES IMBRIANI A Dissertation submitted to the Interdisciplinary Program in the Humanities in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2012 Charles Imbriani defended this dissertation on October 4, 2012. The members of the supervisory committee were: Peter Garretson Professor Directing Dissertation Jonathan Grant University Representative Dennis Moore Committee Member Irene Zanini-Cordi Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to Fred (Freddie) Bissert 1935-2012. I first met Freddie over forty years ago when I stared working for Pan American World Airways in New York. It was twenty-two year later, still with Pan Am, when I took a position as ramp operations trainer; and Freddie was assigned to teach me the tools of the trade. In 1989 while in Berlin for training, Freddie and I witnessed the abandoning of the guard towers along the Berlin Wall by the East Germans. We didn’t realize it then, but we were witnessing the beginning of the end of the Cold War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antitrust Implications of Computer Reservations Systems (CRS's) Derek Saunders
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 51 | Issue 1 Article 5 1985 The Antitrust Implications of Computer Reservations Systems (CRS's) Derek Saunders Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Derek Saunders, The Antitrust Implications of Computer Reservations Systems (CRS's), 51 J. Air L. & Com. 157 (1985) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol51/iss1/5 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. THE ANTITRUST IMPLICATIONS OF COMPUTER RESERVATIONS SYSTEMS (CRS's) DEREK SAUNDERS THE PASSAGE of the Airline Deregulation Act' dramat- ically altered the airline industry. Market forces, rather than government agencies, 2 began to regulate the indus- try. The transition, however, has not been an easy one. Procedures and relationships well suited to a regulated in- dustry are now viewed as outdated, onerous, and even anticompetitive. The current conflict over carrier-owned computer res- ervation systems (CRS's) represents one instance of these problems.3 The air transportation distribution system re- lies heavily on the use of CRS's, particularly since deregu- lation and the resulting increase in airline activity. 4 One I Pub. L. No. 95-504, 92 Stat. 1705 (codified at 49 U.S.C.A. § 1401 (Supp. 1984)). 2 Competitive Market Investigation, CAB Docket 36,595 (Dec. 16, 1982) at 3. For a discussion of deregulation in general and antitrust problems specifically, see Beane, The Antitrust Implications of Airline Deregulation, 45 J.
    [Show full text]
  • TWA's Caribbean Flights Caribbean Cure for The
    VOLUME 48 NUMBER 9 MAY 6, 1985 Caribbean . TWA's Caribbean Flights Cure for The Doldrums TWA will fly to the Caribbean this fall, President Ed Meyer announced. The air­ line willserve nine Caribbean destinations from New York starting November 15; at the same time, it will inaugurate non-stop service between St. Louis and SanJuan. Islands to be served are St. Thomas, the Bahamas, St. Maarten, St. Croix, Antigua, Martinique, Guadeloupe and Puerto Rico. For more than a decade TWA has con­ sistently been the leading airline across . the North Atlantic in terms of passengers carried. With the addition of the Caribbean routes, TWA willadd an important North­ South dimension to its internationalserv­ ices, Mr. Meyer said. "We expect that strong winter loads to Caribbean vacation destinations will help TWA counterbalance relatively light transatlantic traffic at that time of year, . and vice versa," he explained. "Travelers willbenefit from TWA's premiere experi­ ence in international operations and its reputation for excellent service," he added. Mr. Meyer emphasized TWA's leader­ ship as the largest tour operator across the Atlantic, and pointed to the airline's feeder network at both Kennedy and St. Louis: "Passengers from the west and midwest caneasily connect into these ma- (topage4) Freeport � 1st Quarter: Nassau SAN JUAN A Bit Better St. Thomas With the publication of TWA's first-quar­ St. Croix ter financial results,· the perennial ques­ tion recurs: "With load factors like that, how could we lose so much money?" Martinique As always, the answer isn't simple. First the numbers, then the words.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Credit Travel Rewards Catalog Available, You Will Be Advised to Make an Alternate Selection Or May Return Your Points to Your Account
    ScoreCard® Bonus Point Program Rules 4) Reservations shall also be subject to airline availability for advance gift shop purchases, gambling, beauty salon/barber shop/spa services, 1. As provided in these rules (“Rules”), account holders (“You” or “you”) earn (1) Point in the ScoreCard® fare category seating , non-refundable type tickets for the travel dates laundry, photographs, email, internet and fax, etc.) are the responsibility Program (“Program”) for every dollar in qualifying purchases that you: (i) charge to an eligible credit card specified. 5) ScoreCard travel services reserves the right to choose the of the Cardholder. 4) Cruises are non-refundable, non-cancelable and non- account covered by the Program (“Account”); and (ii) that appears on your statement during the Program Period. Purchases that are returned do not qualify for Points. No Points are earned for finance charges, fees, airline and routing on which to reserve and ticket Cardholders. transferable. Once redeemed, Bonus Points may not be added back to your cash advances, convenience checks, ATM withdrawals, foreign transaction currency conversion charges or ScoreCard account. 5) Please check with ScoreCard travel representatives Universal First Class/Business Class Ticket insurance charges posted to your account. Contact your financial institution (“Sponsor”) for full details on the Item Points Item # Item Points Item # for any documentation requirements or other restrictions associated Program Period dates during which you are eligible to earn Points. Cardholder is responsible for any overages above the maximum ticket with cruises. It is the guest’s responsibility to obtain appropriate 2. Points can be used to order the merchandise/travel awards (“Award(s)”) available in the current Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Banning Collection Donated to PAHF — Edward Trippe
    Spring 2021 www.panam.org NEWSLETTERCLI OF THEPP PAN AMER HISTORICAL FOUNDATION From The Chairman, Gene Banning Collection Donated to PAHF — Edward Trippe... Volunteers Help Retrieve, Catalogue and Preserve Historic Materials By Doug Miller his story goes back decades to a Ttime when a new Pan Am pilot named Gene Banning became fascinated with the growing empire of Pan Ameri- can World Airways. His interest soon grew into a studied pursuit and then a life-long passion. The COVID-19 virus has stressed us all, but as I write this letter, Spring and Fast forward decades, to the 1990’s. Now a return to normal life are both in sight. retired, Captain Banning had amassed I hope that our extended PAHF fam- a trove of historic Pan Am materials, ily and friends have survived and are not only his own but those of colleagues such as George Price, Bill Seeman and healthy. As we look ahead, and I know Capt. Banning, courtesy Univ. of Miami I speak for many, we will be happy others. The material in his collection Special Collections to turn the page and return to some was instrumental in helping Banning to author what has become one of the very from Mrs. Banning’s residence. The col- semblance of normalcy — whatever the lection was temporarily stored in a space ‘new norm’ is for each of us. best books ever written about “the world’s most experienced airline”: ‘The Airlines of at the AWARE store in Miami. Remembering Stephen Lyons, Pan American Since 1927’. (Paladwr Press; When it was time to downsize AWARE’s Producer for Across the Pacific Maclean, VA; 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • DUTCH COUNTRY AUCTIONS the Stamp Center Presents PUBLIC AUCTION #334 Now in Our 42Nd Year
    DUTCH COUNTRY AUCTIONS The Stamp Center Presents PUBLIC AUCTION #334 Now In Our 42nd Year #1051 #1418 #503 #986 Tuesday, May 18, 2021 – 10 am ET Wednesday, May 19, 2021 – 10 am ET Thursday, May 20, 2021 – 10 am ET 302-478-8740 www.dutchcountryauctions.com 4115 Concord Pike • Wilmington, DE 19803 48009 Dutch Country Auctions.pdf1 CONDITIONS OF SALE Bidding 1. The placing of a bid will constitute acceptance of the conditions of sale. 2. All bids are per lot as numbered in the catalog. The right is reserved to withdraw any lot or lots and to group two or more lots. 3. Lots are sold to the highest bidder at one advance over the second highest bid. The auctioneer shall regulate the bidding and in the event of any dispute the auctioneer’s decision shall be final. 4. The auctioneer shall not be liable for errors and omissions in executing instructions to bid. 5. Unlimited bids and bids believed not to be made in good faith will be respectfully declined. 6. Minimum bid on any lot is $50.00. 7. All lots will be sold at the price for which they are knocked down by the auctioneer, plus a commission of 15%. Payment of Purchases 8. Successful bidders will be notified of lots purchased and must remit before lots are delivered. Persons who are known to us may, at our option, have purchases forwarded for immediate payment. 9. Terms are immediate payment in U.S. funds on receipt of the invoice. Payment by credit card will be subject to a 2% service charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Classifications, History and Airport Technology Problem 2
    CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2007 Assignment 1: Aircraft Classifications, History and Airport Technology Date Due: Jan/23/2008 Instructor: Trani Problem 2 Read pages 1 and 2 in Chapter 1 in the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 (Airport Design) before answering this question. Also, read the aircraft classification handout provided in class. Examine the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 (Airport Design). Specifically examine Appendix 13 of the FAA Advisory Circular which contains information about various aircraft. a) For the aircraft shown in Table 2.1, state the Airplane Design Group (ADG) class, the Terminal Areas Procedures Aircraft Speed Category, and the wake vortex class for each vehicle. b) For each aircraft, calculate the stalling speed (minimum speed for flight) from the known aircraft approach speeds published in the FAA AC. Stalling speed is just 30% below the approach speed. Table 2.1 Aircraft to be Studied. Aircraft ADG and Speed Classification British Aerospace BAe 146-300 C-III Beech Raytheon Bonanza B36TC A-I Airbus A-320-100 C-III Gulfstream G-IV D-II Boeing 777-300 D-V Boeing 747-400 D-V Boeing 737-500 C-III Beech Airliner 1900-C B-II British Aerospace BAe Jetstream 31 B-II Dassault Falcon FAL-900 B-II Cessna Citation I B-II Bombardier DHC-8 Dash 8-300 B-III Hawker HS 125 Series 700 C-I Bombardier CRJ/200 or Canadair CL-600 B-II Cessna 150 A-I McDonnell Douglas MDC-DC-9-82 C-III CEE 4674 A1 Trani Page 1 of 3 c) Match the names with the 2-D drawings (use the number of the aircraft and match by writing on the space to the right of each aircraft).
    [Show full text]
  • Temagami Times – Summer 2019
    VOLUME 49 . NUMBER 2 . CIRCULATION 1,200 A FREE PUBLICATION Temagami Times THE VOICE OF THE TEMAGAMI LAKES ASSOCIATION (TLA) SUMMER 2019 A Curious Pine Marten on Island 210 – August 2018 (photo by Heather Reid) Bush flying has played a key role in TH 1919, the US government donated Canada’s north – enabling access to 100 a number of surplus Curtiss HS-2Ls remote areas in hours, where travel seaplanes in Halifax to the Canadian previously took days or even weeks. Government. The St. Maurice Forest My first floatplane flight was at the age ANNIVERSARYof Protection Authority in Quebec took of five, when my father (a prospector an interest in the concept of using and mining-exploration contractor) aircraft for forestry support, and were took me to a mining property where able to secure two of the HS-2L aircraft he was working. Bush Flying in Canada from the government of Canada. Stuart 2019 is the 100th anniversary of the By Rob Corcoran signed on as their pilot. inception of bush flying (and of peace- time, professional flying) in Canada – which would certainly seem to be an event worth Naval Air Station, celebrating this year. Stuart Graham was Canada’s first and in 1917, Stu- bush pilot and first professional peacetime pilot. His art decided to sign wife, Marguerite (Madge), was Canada’s first, female, up for flying, rather aircraft crew-member. She flew as a navigator to ferry than return to the two Curtiss HS-2L, single-engine, flying-boats from trenches. After six Halifax, Nova Scotia to Grand-Mère, Quebec in June hours of training, he and July of 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition to Safety Management Systems (SMS) in Aviation: Is Canada Deregulating Flight Safety?, 81 J
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 81 | Issue 1 Article 3 2002 The rT ansition to Safety Management Systems (SMS) in Aviation: Is Canada Deregulating Flight Safety? Renè David-Cooper Federal Court of Appeal of Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Renè David-Cooper, The Transition to Safety Management Systems (SMS) in Aviation: Is Canada Deregulating Flight Safety?, 81 J. Air L. & Com. 33 (2002) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol81/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. THE TRANSITION TO SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (SMS) IN AVIATION: IS CANADA DEREGULATING FLIGHT SAFETY? RENE´ DAVID-COOPER* ABSTRACT In 2013, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) adopted Annex 19 to the Chicago Convention to implement Safety Management Systems (SMS) for airlines around the world. While most ICAO Member States worldwide are still in the early stages of introducing SMS, Canada became the first and only ICAO country in 2008 to fully implement SMS for all Canadian-registered airlines. This article will highlight the documented shortcomings of SMS in Canada during the implementation of the first ever SMS framework in civil aviation. While air carriers struggled to un- derstand and introduce SMS into their operations, this article will illustrate how Transport Canada (TC) did not have the knowledge or the necessary resources to properly guide airline operators during this transition, how SMS was improperly tai- lored for smaller air carriers, and how the Canadian govern- ment canceled safety inspections around the country, leaving many air carriers partially unregulated.
    [Show full text]
  • NTSB-AAR-72-18 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD Title PAGE
    SA-424 FILE NO. 1-0002 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT WESTERN AIR LINES, INC. BOEING 720-047B,N3166 ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA MARCH 31, 1971 ADOPTED: JUNE 7, 1972 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, 0. C. 20591 REPORT NUMBER: NTSB-AAR-72-18 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TiTLE PAGE . Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB-AAR-72-18 I. Title and Subtitle 5.Report Date Aircraft Accident Report - Western Air Lines, InC., Sune 7, 1972 Roeing 720-047B, N3166, Ontario International Airport, 6.Performing Organization Ontario. California, March 31, 1971 Code '. Author(s) 8.Performing Organization Report No. I. Performing Organization Name and Address IO.Work Unit No. Bureau of Aviation Safety 11 .Contract or Grant No. National Transportation Safety Board Washington, D. C. 20591 13.Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Aircraft Accident Report March 31, 1971 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, 0. C. 20591 14.Sponsoring Agency Code 15.Supplementary Notes I6.Abstract Flight 366, a Boeing 720B, on a proficiency check flight, yawed and rolled out of control, and crashed while in the process of executing a 3-engine missed- approach from a simulated engine-out ILS instrument approach. The five crew- members and only occupants died in the crash. The weather conditions at Ontario were 600 feet overcast, with 3/4-mile visibility in fog, haze, and smoke. The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the failure of the aircraft rudder hydraulic actuator support fitting. The failure of the fitting resulted in the inapparent loss Of left rudder control which, under the conditions of this flight, precluded the pilotk ability to maintain directional control during a simlated engine-out missed- approach.
    [Show full text]