<<

, , ,

"

beginning as "The Boe ing Clipper". the opment of Model 294, the Air Corps "Pro­ word was not a model name like ject X" that was to become the XB-15, "Flying Fortress" (Model 299) or "Strat­ the Model 299 that was the ill-fated proto­ oliner" (Model 307). The word "Clipper", type of the B-17, and was cu rrently con­ made famous by the famous line of fast, tinuing XB-15 work and redesigning the square-rigged sailing ships developed by B-17 for production when the re­ Donald McKay in the late 1840s, was ac­ quest was received on February 28, 1936. tually owned by Pan Ameri ca n. After ap­ With so much already in the works, it wa s The was a marvelous machine plying it as part of the names on individ­ felt that the company couldn't divert the even by today's standards. She was big, comfort· ual , as "", "Clip­ engineering manpower needed for still a­ able and very dependable. At 84,000 Ibs. gross per America", etc., the got a copy­ nother big project. weight, with 10 degrees of and no wind, she right on the word and subsequently be­ The deadline for response had passed used 3,200 ft. to take off, leaving the water in 47 came very possessive over its use. I t is re­ when Wellwood E. Beall, an engineer di­ seconds. At 70,000 Ibs. with 20 degrees of flap ported to have had injuncions issued verted to sa les and service work , returned and a30 knot headwind, she was off in just 240 h., against Packard for use of the work " Clip­ from a trip to Ch ina to deliver 10 Boeing leaving the water in only eight seconds. At leh are per" as the name of a car series and against 281 s, the export version of the Army's the new Wright 579CI 4AC 1 14 cylinder twin row Piper A ircraft for its use on the Piper "Clip­ P-26A "Peashooter". When informed of radial engines which developed 1,600 hp. for take per" . Pan Am's use of the name the Pan Am request and the passing of the off, 8 refinement of the basic R·2600·A2 0 Dubie continues into the and the latest deadline, he immediately got excited over Cyclones which powered the first six machines and Boeing 747SPs delivered in 1976. The the possibilities of such a project. generated 1,500 hp. for take off. Hamilton-Stand­ same names are frequently used again on With no authorization for su ch activity Ird three-bladed propellers, were full-feathering, new models as old ones are retired. "Amer­ on company time, he worked feveri shly constant speed types, measuring 14 ft. nine inches ican Clipper" (or "Clipper Amer ica") has at home evenings to rough out a design in diameter. They, as well as the new engines were been used on Sikorsky S-40, Boeing 314, that would meet the requirements. What retrofitted to older models to bring them up to Lockheed 049 "Constellation", Boeing he turned out was a cross between a pre­ 314A standards. At right, the Anzac Clipper 377 "Stratocruiser", . two Boeing 707s, liminary design study and a sales bro­ (NC18611) undergoing tests at Boeing. She was and the . scrapped in 1950. Bottom: Artist's rendition of chure; his wife was an interior decorator NC18603 (Yankee Clipper) which crashed on Boeing's Bid and made up color paintings of appealing Boeing very nearly passed up Pan Am's cabin interiors. 'Inding in harbor Feb. 23, 1943. request for a design study Actually, it A major part of the design work, it did . Starting in mid-1934, the engineering turned out, had already been done. Con­ resources of the company had been sideration had already been given to using stretched thin by the simultaneous devel­ the XB-15 wing on any design that might 26

be developed under the Pan i\: ;', r8quest. Further, the airline had already specified the engines and propellers to be used . Be II's moin task , then, was to match those to a suitable hull, tail assembly, and auxil· iary flotation system After showing h is idea to top manage­ men t and convincing them that engineer­ ing could handle the job, Bea ll got au thor· iza tion to contact Pan Am to request an extension of the dead I ine. The request was gra nted . Engineering officially got under way on Boeing MOdel 314 after Beall was re­ lieved of his sa les and service duties and 1. External view of clipper bow showing two· given a group of 11 eng ineers for the new section side door, mooring ·towing posts, and the projec t. recessed steps that were to be found only on the Beall, aerodynamicist Ral ph Cram, and first six Clippers. They were deleted when they company presid ent Clair EQtvedt left Seat­ were converted to the later A·314 configuration. tle for New York on May 9, 1936, with their proposal . Pan Am revie'lled it, liked it, and awarded a contract for six 314s, wi th an opt ion for six more, on July 31, 1936 Unit prices worked out to $618,908 pe r airplane with an additional $756.450 fo r engines and airplane spares. An amend· ment to the contract on Jan uary 20, 1937, extended the specified delivery dates for the six units by three months, but there were to be o ther schedule slides later Design Requirements Boei ng engineers led by Beall, who had b,~en aSSigned as Project Engineer for the 3 ,4 , laid down fou r prima ry design re­ quirements for the . These were :

1. To fulfill the airline 's requirement for a lO,OO-pound payload to be carried (or 2400 mi les (San Franci sco- distance) agai nst a 30-mile headwind at a cruising speed o f 150 m.ph. at 10,000 feet. 2. To perm it efficient operat ion with a minimum of crew fat igue (su ch a flight would take a minimum of 16 hours). 3 To efficiently provide unpreceden­ ted comfort, spaciousness, and luxury for the passenge rs.

2. Details of bow compartment ahead of the water·tight forward bulkhead in a completed Clipper hull, Post·like object in center is one of two that were installed in sockets in the bow to secure towing and mooring lines_ Small hatch is at top, larger two·section door at leh, 3. Fully·assembled hull was mounted on a laun· ching dolly. after which Clipper's stern was moved outside hangar door so that tail surfaces could be attached. Attach point for planing hy· drostabilizers or sponsons can be seen on hull's side. These carried four of clipper's six fuel tanks, two in each sponson. 4, Underside view of Clipper engine showing clean lines and smooth intersection with the thick wing. The were almost exact duplicates of those on XB·15, as was Clipper's wing. 5&6_ The four engine nacelles were large enough for mechanics to work in and their side access doors could also be used as work platforms. Easily attached work stands were carried on the airplane for engine repair ahead of the firewall . 2E 6,

:_.I1 J,

"

5

4. To I\lake the airplane as safe as pos· sib l", withi n (he existi ng kno vi edge of ma teria ls, equipment, and the science o f !ca lled tate-of-the-d n 10 ay ) Working from the pred etermined pay­ load and the fu el req uire to \.1 0 ht d is­ t nu:~, plus ,;rew wight , tile engin t::e r qUi ck ly es tab li shed an approx imate gross weiqh t from the prevai ling and rpJ latively co nst ant ratio o f airpl ane emp ty weigh t to dispos ble load. Thi worked out !O Slightly ove r 80,000 pou nds, I !e ar ly 10,000 j.>o unds above ha t 01 he Jj art ia lly-cOl ll' pie ted X B· 15 bOI - lO r. Al lhOugh the liSe of tile ,-,xi s t ill~ bomber wing on the tlyil'lg 7. The first Clipper afloat, showing the height bOdt would resul t in d wiIlg load il) in­ of the nacelles and propellers above the water u ease from 25 po nds p ~r 5 re fuo t to and on-board work platforms on both sides of 28, it waul lie ha nd led I)y the big t;)( el1 ­ the nacelles. Compare shape of air intakes with lilleS to e ins ta ll ed in 11<: boa t. those of later model in photo 5. Clipper hull ~ 11th the wi ng(- n ine det il s estab­ drew four feet of water. lishtd. thb lob boi le down a design ing 8. Interior view of wing crawlway with mechan­ [he most effi(;lent hull oossi ble to cdrry ic working inside one of the nacelles. the crew llnd Lisseng ers. I na to; it to th e 9. Top view of left-hand hydrostab ilizer with wing, dnd reso lve [h e mill iun dncJ 011 access cover~ removed prior to installation on trad e- offs bE: l'.\een the weight, In Ol1 LA the airplane.

7

- I. II

9 .. , 1. Right -hand hydrostabilizer installed on the \ first clipper . Note the bulbous tip and the .... • •• squared ·off trailing edge. Hydrostabilizer made an excellent loading platform for passengers and crew. ­ 2. The first Clipper was designed and flown with - 11\­ the small single fin and rudder assembly shown , I which proved to be inadequate. Note recessed -' steps in hull at left and how the bottom of the rudder is bulged to fair with the cross·section of the hull at the rudder post. Photo taken May 25, .1 1938. 3. Closeup of the original single rudder. It is equipped with double tabs, one for control, one for trim . 4&5 . An intermediate form of the Clipper tail used two outboard fins and rudders as on the 8·24, but the final form used the outboard rud· ders with a central fin as shown in these photos. 2 3

i I . ~

turino ~ os t. and function o f p.ilc l ~ i tPIn Th.· hilSic ,-h oice be lvw" ' 11 il ful k ant ilHver vl inQ ur il liqh u]r strut-b ar ee! St rur t'lr'> with ,11­ r>nd illl draq r eni,l W dS r",so lvt;(! bv thE' rNrl il abil i ty of til, r ntilevc: r lJoll1 b'Jr .. inq Wh ilr. parl ier fl'{'nq boa ts li k,,j th (> MCl rtlll 130 ilnd th e Consnl icl J f'ri PBY rile! hilv,' cantil<'vu inqs. th ey W"' P rai sed ab ow ~ a rpilltivn lv b ro ile! hu t shilllO\v 11Uil to qi th l" prl.l jlPIlp.rs , w hirh W rl-' in line With tllP w inq chord plan"J. ilci p qLIc)'C! waler c:lc ;I '- < l[) ~e _ Tll i" rp.quirf'e! the USf' r) f S ruts to stilb ili / ' ~ t h c~ .I ,lllS as 1I )(>fStrIIC lifO' b e tw (~ o; n I)p' h u!ls clnd tllP w -nilS tllat W(lS ma n ly a subs i I t' ~ fur th0 old '-"l1 t«( SP.<. · tio n strl)ts. A w ini) di l qly 0 1) the Ilu ll uf fpred far Irss dran. bu t decfPas/?d tl1l; P5 sPfl tial wall" ( lerJr an ,.. ,o n f he prl.lpellprs E"r lip.r (lncl sl nallpr flush 'Ni ng boats li ~1' th ", D OIJ ~ l las " Dolnh in" h;ld th ei r- enqi nc> rnountn above the win_ on stru ts. Th Q sla '"-o f-t he-art \NilS movinq ow r lli'lhrJ f but nilrrower hulls. and B') ei ng followe desi qns al ready undc>r ~ a 'y in o th er pla nts. the Si korsk y X PBS·' ilnd the Consolidatp. XPB 2Y·1 , in usinC) a dr ep hlill w i h th r? winq directly on top of The prilnary struc­ 5 tu re ilnci fained into the top supers rue­ ture, y r.c ' with the enCline nace lles on the winq Ir!ading edCJe- Design Details M u~ h 0 f the in te ri or and equ ipmen de u il fu r the Clil)r"cr wa spelled ou y P(ln Am in its oriq inal speci fic

8

6. Rear view of complete of three· tailed Clipper showing elevator tabs and method \ j of fairing elevators to hull for level flight. Dolly is supporting just under 25 tons, empty weight. 7. The Clipper wing duplicated the construction of the XB·15 wing in using bolted square alum· NX inum tube trusses for the spars and aluminum tubes and channels for the wing ribs. B. Closeup of exceptional workmanship. Left· hand split trailing edge flap in full down posi­ tion. Note how upper surface of flap fits into 18601 matching underside of tr il ilill~ edge. 9. Closeup of the outboard fin that was added to the Clipper after its first test flight. Note the attach fittings for extensions of the shortened ••• •• stabilizer. 10. Clipper's center fin was a single fabric-cov­ ered unit having the same outline as the original single fin-and -rudder cOl11lJination . 31 ~ .'/ . num tubing. Ribs Wf!. (' both square tubing by bulting new detachable tips to the out­ and channel. Coveril1g was sheet alumi­ board side of the fins. num from the rear ,nar forward and fab­ - Vertical Fins - The original single verti­ ric from that point a"t. As a safety feature cal fin was like the stabilizer, a metal -s kin­ (which paid off handso mely in early taxi ned cantilever unit that bolted to the top testing), the outer ends of the wing were of the stabilizer, not to the hull. This was built as water-tiflhf flotation compart­ repl aced by a fabric-covered unit that dup­ rnents in case thr; shill heeled far enough licated the shape of the original fin-rud­ to dig in a wingtip. der combination. The outboard fins were Wright R-2600-A2 "Double Cyclones" Two fuel tanks, plus mail and also full-cantilever units bolted to the were specified by Pan Am when its pro­ compartments, were built into each side squared-off ends of the shortened stabili­ posal was issued to the industry. In a way, of the wing center sec tion and heavy car­ zer. this 1200 h.p engine, delivering 1500 h.p. go was loaded through a hatch in the cen­ Nacelles - The nacelles were another direct for , was the only feature of the ter of the wing right at the airplane center inheritance from the XB-15, which had Boeing 314 that could be regarded as a of gravity. This same hinged hatch also been designed to use four-bank 14 -cylin­ gamble or an unknown factor . Experimen­ contained an astral sighting blister for the der I iquid-cooled All ison engines that ne­ tal versions of the engine had been flown navigator. ver materialized. The R-2600s of the 314 in military airplanes but no production Hull - The all-metal hull introduced some were bigger than the Pratt & Whitney R­ versions had been built or installed. Pan innovations in flying boat practice. First, 1830s forced on the B-15 and fitted easily Am ga1nbled on Wright's reputation when it was not built up full-length in a jig and into the big nacelles. it specified the R-2600. Actually, it had then mated to the wing. The port ion un­ A novel feature, never used before or no choice; it needed an eng ine more pow­ der the main wing spars was built as an in­ since on any U.S. transport, was the pro­ erful than any then in service, and the tergral unit with the center section and in­ vision for in-flight engine maintenance. Wright was the only one available The board nacelles. The other hull sections, The bomber wing was thick enough to al ­ Boeing XB ·15 was severely handicapped built separately, were then added . low personnel to crawl to the engines and by having to use the "small" Pratt & Whit­ The traditional longitudinal division of the nacelles were large enough to permit ney R-1830s when it was designed to use the hull into a number of separate water­ them to work. The stainless steel firewall the V-3420 Allison; had the R-2600 been tight compartments was unsuitable for a was made in two removeable sections so a lemon, the 314 program would have passenger plane and was deleted in favor that the back of the engine could be ser­ been a disaster. of a compartmented "Double Bottom" viced in flight. In addition, each As it turned out, the R-2600 was one based on ship construction. There were had an access door on each side for main­ of the most efficient transport plane en­ only two full-depth water-tight bulkheads tenance on the surface. When lowered, gines of its day, with the lowest specific - a "collision bulkhead" ahead of the in­ these could be used as work platforms. fuel consumption (in pounds per horse­ strument panel to prevent hull flooding if Other work platforms carried on the air­ power hour) of the models then in ser­ th e bow was crushed and one between the plane could be attached to the nacelles for vice. I t was also the fi rst commercial en­ passenger compartment and the tail. work ahead of the firewall . gine to use 100 octane gasoline. The great depth of the hull made sep­ Hydrostabilizers - One distinctive feature Another innovation in the powerplant arate levels for the passenger and crew of the314 was the use of hydrostabilizers, department was the use of full-feathering areas a logical choice. Because of the up­ also known as sponsons, instead of wing­ propellers for the first time on an . ward slope of the bottom of the hull aft mounted floats for lateral stability on the Variable-pitch propellers had been in use of the step, the floor levels of the aft pas­ water. Th ese originated with Dornier in for serveral years, but had a disadvantage senger compartments were progressively Germany in 1918. Known then as "Flos­ in case of engine failure. The propeller raised . As on all , the 314 had a senstummel", they were virtually a Dor­ would "windmill" in. the airstream, often transverse hydroplane step slightly aft of nier exclusive until the Martin 130 ap­ damaging the engine. Some were the center of gravity v/ith a second step, peared in 1934 . Because of the "cube law", fitted with propeller brakes to stop this essential to large flying boats, farther aft. their buoyancy increased as the cube of rotation, but with full-feathering, the the aft step was pointed to reduce aero­ the dimension, making them much more blades could be brought edgewise to the dynamic drag and terminated at the water efficie nt for large flying boats than for and the propeller rotation rudder . small. stopped. This also reduced drag . a criti­ Wh ile the dimensions of the 314 did The Boeing versions were divided into cal item to the continued flight of a bne not approach those of the German Dornier five compartments, two o f which served engine-out airplane, particularly over th e DO-X of 1929, the 12'1doot width of the as fuel tanks. Reserve buoyancy was such ocean. hull made it the first production "wide that stability would still be maintained if The Ham il ton Standard Propeller Com­ body" transport 30 years before the ad­ one of the empty compartments ruptured pany announced the availability of this vent of the Boeing 747, which coined the and filled with water. The hydrostabili­ new feature at the time Pan Am was draw­ term. The nearest previous American ap­ zers made excellent loading platforms, ing up its specifications, and the airline proach was the Fokker F-32 of 1930 with the passengers and crew stepping directly specified it . an eight-foot ten-inch wide cabin. The from them through the entry doors on ei­ Structure , with 12 feet, was still 20 ther side of the hull. In keeping with current design trends, years in the future. Control Surfaces it was specified that the structure of the Empennage - This term usually applies to All moveable control surfaces shared 314 be all metal, al though with some areilS the whole tail assembly, but will be limi­ the common features of aluminum tube­ of fabric covering. Details of specific struc­ ted here to the stabil izer and fins. The and-channel construction with fabric cov­ tural components are presented below. rudders and elevators are described under ering . Wing - The th ree-piece wing was an almost Control Surfaces. - Ai lerons - The metal-frame ailerons were exact duplicate of that on the XB-15, in­ - Stilbilizer - The full -c antilever horizontal Frieze type with static and aerodynamic cluding the symmetrical NACA airfoil that stabilizer was builtasa single unitand was balance area ahead of the hinge line. These tapered from an 0018 at the root to 0010 metal-skinned. It bolted directly to the top operated differentially; that is, with more at the tip. The center section to a point of the primary hull structure; the top of up t ravel than down to reduce aileron outboard of the inboard nacelles was built the hull directly ahead of it was built up yaw. Ea ch aileron had one trim tab and integral with the hull while the outer pan­ to form a streamline fairing for it. The was divided into two separate units to re­ els were separate removeable un its. span of the basic stabilizer structure was duce hinge binding when the wing flexed The wing used two main Pratt-truss shortened when the outboard fins were under load. 32 .. ".' ..,

:i , ,

NC18606 (American Clipper) prior to a 1941 flight. She was scrapped in 1950. Boeing 314A Clipper performance was exceptional for its time. Lih-off speed was 95 knots. Cruise at 11,000 h. 140 knots. Top cruise was 155 knots. "Never-exceed" redline was 184 knots. Stall speed at 84,000 lb. maximum gross load with flaps down and power on was 55 knots. Approach was flown at 90 knots with 40 degrees of flap, with touch­ dllwn at 80 knots /70 knots in rough wated. Optimum climb speed with one outboard engi"" 'Jut was 103 knots. Maximum 5well height for take off and was 2Y> ft. Operational ceiling was 16,000 h_ Range without headwind in terry condition wa5 30 houn and 3,700 nautical miles. Absoute ferry was 32 hours_

El evators - The fabric-covered eleva tors . Rudders - The rudders used the same tab­ havetwo crewsworking in shifts; the facil­ were so larg e and heavy that they required and 'spring control system as the elevators ities that Boeing provided for them were something new in transport plane control. and incorporated a small degree of aero­ a real revolution. The upper deck for The surfaces were fitted w i th two tab s on dynamic balance. The outboard rudders crew, communication gear and cargo was each side. one for control and one for incorporated slots to allow movement over nine feet six inches wide by 21 feet four trim . The control tab had twice the effec­ the outboard portions of the stabilizer inches long and wassix feet 1 Yo inches from tiveness of the trim tab. The elevators that were located aft of the rudder hinge ceiling to floor. them selves were connected to the pilot's line Normal flight crew was six - Pilot, Co­ controls only through springs. The con­ Flaps - The metal-frame. fabric-covered pilot, Navigator, Radioman, and the new trols moved th e tabs . which in turn moved flaps were known as the "split"type since positions of and "master"' the elevators. The springs gave a degree of they were fitted under the wing trailing or Watch Officer. The "master" was, "feel " proportional to surface movement. edge. wh ich stayed in place when the flaps in the tradition of the sea, captain of the At high angles of displacement the spring were lowered. Full flap deflection of 60 Clipper, although he did not fly her. Add links became rigid and further el evator degrees was normally used for landing two cabin attendants to make eight, then movement was directly from the control while 20 degrees were used for takeoff. double it for two shifts and you have a column. Originally. the 314s were equipped with total of 16. .>j( The elevators were statically balanced water rudders fitted to the pointed end of For the size of the airplane, the pilots to 85% by a singl e counterweight in the the rear step ThesE: were not on the later sat at a remarkably clean panel . Many of hull and by smaller weights at the out ­ A-314s and were d l : l l ~ ted from the earlier the traditional instruments, plus some board ends. These were on arms project­ models; for it Wd S l:Clsier to steer on the new ones. were now on the new flight en­ ing into the stabili zer; the full travel of the wa ter by using asymmetric power on the gineer's panel on the right side of the cabin weights accommodated by adding alumi­ eng ines behind the radioman. The pilot had en­ num "blisters" to the top and bottom sur­ Crew Accommodation gine, propeller, and trim tab controls on a faces of the stabilizer. There was no aero­ The non-stop routes to be flown by th e stand to the left of his two-movement dynamic balance. 314 were so long tl-,at it was necessary to (plus tilting) seat, while the copilot had a '/J llul ~ w~. :u. irJtw\~ . 33 1. Clipper's instrument panel looks very bare dl.l l' l i ra ~ Q 5e 0' his ' iyh . The rilo s used table for data and an extra chair for con ­ compared to even a small twin·engine type to· thl~l r th r it le5 m d lnly (N l1lanp.l lv

_ J A1­ ..J.. -:..r ,,,, o·

J~ . \ 1 ::. 1 I ., ,t'·o- ;­ 3':t . '=t \0>

61