Final Performance Evaluation of the ASOTRY Development Food Security Activity in Madagascar
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Final Performance Evaluation of the ASOTRY Development Food Security Activity in Madagascar March 2020 |Volume II – Annexes J, K & L IMPEL | Implementer-Led Evaluation & Learning Associate Award ABOUT IMPEL The Implementer-Led Evaluation & Learning Associate Award works to improve the design and implementation of Food for Peace (FFP) funded development food security activities (DFSAs) through implementer-Led evaluations and knowledge sharing. Funded by the USAID Office of Food for Peace (FFP), the Implementer-Led Evaluation & Learning Associate Award will gather information and knowledge in order to measure performance of DFSAs, strengthen accountability, and improve guidance and policy. This information will help the food security community of practice and USAID to design projects and modify existing projects in ways that bolster performance, efficiency and effectiveness. The Implementer-Led Evaluation & Learning Associate Award is a two-year activity (2019-2021) implemented by Save the Children (lead), TANGO International, and Tulane University, in Haiti, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Madagascar, Malawi, Nepal, and Zimbabwe. RECOMMENDED CITATION IMPEL. (2020). Final Performance Evaluation of the ASOTRY Development Food Security Activity in Madagascar (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: The Implementer-Led Evaluation & Learning Associate Award PHOTO CREDITS Douglas R. Brown. Rice fields in central Madagascar at various stages of planting. September 2019. DISCLAIMER This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the Implementer-Led Evaluation & Learning (IMPEL) award and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTACT INFORMATION IDEAL Activity c/o Save the Children 899 North Capitol Street NE, Suite #900 Washington, DC 20002 www.fsnnetwork.org [email protected] PREPARED BY: Final Performance Evaluation of the Food for Peace ASOTRY DFSA in Madagascar TABLE OF CONTENTS Annex J: FFP Endline Indicators ..........................................................................................................1 Annex K: Data Collection Instruments .................................................................................................7 Part A: Qualitative Study Topical Outlines ............................................................................................. 7 Part B: Quantitative Population-Based Survey ..................................................................................... 20 Annex L: Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest ..................................................................................... 108 Table of Contents i Final Performance Evaluation of the ASOTRY DFSA in Madagascar ANNEX J: FFP ENDLINE INDICATORS Table 1: FFP endline indicators - ASOTRY Indicators, 95% Confidence Intervals and Base Population [Madagascar, 2019] 95% Confidence Number Indicator Interval of Weighted Standard Standard Value Lower Upper Records Population Deviation Error DEFT FOOD SECURITY INDICATORS Prevalence of households with moderate or severe hunger (HHS) 24.4 20.0 28.8 976 93,714 2.1 45.98 1.5 Male and Female Adults 21.5 18.5 24.6 745 93,842 1.5 44.14 0.9 Adult Female no Adult Male 33.7 22.0 45.3 166 88,231 5.6 50.20 1.4 Adult Male no Adult Female 33.8 21.9 45.8 55 87,314 5.8 50.26 0.9 Child No Adults NA NA NA 10 31,844 NA NA NA Average Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) 3.8 3.6 4.0 762 73,046 0.1 1.94 1.2 POVERTY INDICATORS Per capita expenditures (as a proxy for income) of USG- assisted areas $1.44 $1.34 $1.55 969 98,136 0.1 1.43 1.1 Male and Female Adults $1.50 $1.37 $1.63 739 98,321 0.1 1.49 1.1 Adult Female no Adult Male $1.14 $0.99 $1.29 166 92,970 0.1 0.96 1.0 Adult Male no Adult Female $1.60 $1.17 $2.03 54 91,900 0.2 1.58 1.0 Child No Adults NA NA NA 10 33,444 NA NA NA Prevalence of poverty: Percent of people living on less than $1.90/day 78.4 74.1 82.7 980 99,126 2.1 43.89 1.5 Male and Female Adults 76.8 71.8 81.8 748 99,126 2.4 45.01 1.5 Adult Female no Adult Male 87.6 82.0 93.1 167 93,028 2.7 35.11 1.0 Adult Male no Adult Female 69.8 54.3 85.2 55 92,027 7.5 49.22 1.1 Child No Adults NA NA NA 10 33,444 NA NA NA Mean depth of poverty 38.6 36.1 41.1 980 99,126 1.2 31.90 1.2 Male and Female Adults 36.6 33.8 39.5 748 99,126 1.4 31.34 1.2 Adult Female no Adult Male 47.0 42.3 51.7 167 93,028 2.3 32.16 0.9 Annex J: FFP Endline Indicators 1 IMPEL | Implementer-Led Evaluation and Learning Indicators, 95% Confidence Intervals and Base Population [Madagascar, 2019] 95% Confidence Number Indicator Interval of Weighted Standard Standard Value Lower Upper Records Population Deviation Error DEFT Adult Male no Adult Female 36.7 25.6 47.7 55 92,027 5.3 34.01 1.2 Child No Adults NA NA NA 10 33,444 NA NA NA WASH INDICATORS Percent of households using an improved drinking water source 27.2 19.6 34.9 978 93,945 3.7 47.67 2.4 Percent of households in target areas practicing correct use of recommend household water treatment technologies 36.3 31.9 40.7 977 93,905 2.1 51.46 1.3 Percent of households in target areas practicing boiling 35.0 30.0 40.0 978 93,945 2.4 51.05 1.5 Percent of households in target areas practicing bleaching 6.9 4.8 9.1 978 93,945 1.1 27.20 1.2 Percent of households in target areas practicing filtering 0.6 -0.5 1.6 978 93,945 0.5 8.03 1.9 Percent of households in target areas practicing solar disinfecting 0.3 -0.2 0.8 978 93,945 0.2 6.06 1.3 Percent of households that can obtain drinking water in less than 30 minutes (round trip) 72.2 68.0 76.3 978 93,945 2.0 47.99 1.3 Percent of households using improved sanitation facilities 0.9 -0.2 1.9 978 93,945 0.5 9.89 1.6 Percent of households in target areas practicing open defecation 37.6 31.3 43.8 978 93,945 3.0 51.85 1.8 Percent of households with soap and water at a handwashing station commonly used by family members 7.8 5.8 9.7 978 93,945 0.9 28.65 1.0 AGRICULTURAL INDICATORS Percentage of farmers who used financial services in the past 12 months 20.7 16.1 25.4 1,105 122,793 2.3 42.84 1.8 Male farmers 21.9 16.8 27.0 624 125,697 2.5 43.57 1.4 Female farmers 19.3 13.6 24.9 481 125,914 2.7 41.85 1.4 Percentage of farmers who practiced the value chain activities promoted by the project in the past 12 months 27.1 22.1 32.2 1,116 124,199 2.4 46.95 1.7 Male farmers 30.3 24.6 36.0 629 126,245 2.8 48.45 1.4 Female farmers 23.1 17.4 28.7 487 126,772 2.7 44.60 1.4 2 Annex J: FFP Endline Indicators Final Performance Evaluation of the ASOTRY DFSA in Madagascar Indicators, 95% Confidence Intervals and Base Population [Madagascar, 2019] 95% Confidence Number Indicator Interval of Weighted Standard Standard Value Lower Upper Records Population Deviation Error DEFT Percentage of farmers who used at least three sustainable agricultural practices and/or technologies in the past 12 months 64.4 57.2 71.7 818 92,716 3.5 50.60 2.0 Male farmers 68.3 60.2 76.4 479 110,602 3.9 48.82 1.8 Female farmers 59.0 51.4 66.5 339 110,932 3.6 51.95 1.3 Percentage of farmers who used at least two sustainable crop practices and/or technologies in the past 12 months 50.8 43.7 57.8 1,148 128,818 3.4 52.62 2.2 Male farmers 54.1 45.8 62.3 646 128,818 4.0 52.34 1.9 Female farmers 46.4 40.1 52.8 502 128,818 3.1 52.65 1.3 Percentage of farmers who used at least two sustainable livestock practices and/or technologies in the past 12 months 34.1 29.3 38.9 1,148 128,818 2.3 49.90 1.6 Male farmers 38.0 32.3 43.8 646 128,818 2.8 50.98 1.4 Female farmers 29.0 23.9 34.1 502 128,818 2.5 47.90 1.2 Percentage of farmers who used at least two sustainable NRM practices and/or technologies in the past 12 months 2.4 0.8 4.0 818 92,716 0.8 16.06 1.4 Male farmers 2.9 0.8 5.0 479 110,602 1.0 17.67 1.3 Female farmers 1.6 -0.1 3.2 339 110,932 0.8 13.08 1.1 Percentage of farmers who used improved storage practices in the past 12 months 74.0 68.2 79.8 1,093 122,971 2.8 46.20 2.0 Male farmers 76.8 70.5 83.0 629 126,783 3.0 44.41 1.7 Female farmers 70.2 63.9 76.5 464 125,006 3.1 48.16 1.4 WOMEN'S HEALTH AND NUTRITION INDICATORS Prevalence of underweight women 15.7 12.1 19.3 918 98,397 1.7 38.61 1.4 Minimum Dietary Diversity - Women (MDD-W) 13.3 10.2 16.4 986 105,458 1.5 35.97 1.3 Women’s Dietary Diversity Score (WDDS) 2.9 2.8 3.1 986 105,458 0.1 1.42 1.5 Percent of births receiving at least 4 antenatal care (ANC) visits 62.1 56.5 67.6 483 51,906 2.7 52.13 1.1 Contraceptive Prevalence Rate 39.0 32.3 45.7 509 54,578 3.2 52.40 1.4 Annex J: FFP Endline Indicators 3 IMPEL | Implementer-Led Evaluation and Learning Indicators, 95% Confidence Intervals and Base Population [Madagascar, 2019] 95% Confidence Number Indicator Interval of Weighted Standard Standard Value Lower Upper Records Population Deviation Error DEFT CHILDREN'S HEALTH AND NUTRITION INDICATORS Prevalence of underweight children under 5 years of age (Total) 15.9 12.0 19.9 755 75,730 1.9 39.09 1.3 Male 17.7 12.9 22.4 374 75,730 2.3 40.43 1.1 Female 14.2 9.9 18.4 381 75,730 2.1 37.54 1.1 Prevalence of stunted children under 5 years of age (Total) 39.4 33.7 45.0 755 75,730 2.7 52.20 1.4 Male 41.9 35.1 48.6 374 75,730 3.3 52.29 1.2 Female 36.9 30.1 43.7 381 75,730 3.3 51.96 1.2 Prevalence of wasted children under 5 years of age (Total) 2.9 1.5 4.3 755 75,730 0.7 17.92 1.0 Male 3.8 1.7 5.9 374 75,730 1.0 20.22 1.0 Female 2.0 0.4 3.6 381 75,730 0.8 15.07 1.0 Percentage of children under age 5 with diarrhea in the last two weeks (Total) 17.1 13.5 20.8 779 78,517 1.8 40.30 1.2 Male