<<

on 7 April, clarify the relationships between ’s first modern , later H. sapiens and , but also throw up some new questions. One study, in Nature1, is based on a tooth and fragmentary remains from Bacho Kiro in ; the other, in Ecol- ogy and Evolution2, looks at a nearly complete skull from a cave known as Zlatý kůň in the Czech Republic. The three oldest Bacho Kiro individuals, dated to between 45,900 and 42,600 old, all had recent forebears, reports a team led by molecular biologist Mateja Hajdinjak and evolutionary geneticist Svante Pääbo, both at the Max Planck Insti- tute for Evolutionary Anthropology (MPI– EVA) in Leipzig, . The of modern non-Africans usually harbour about 2% Neanderthal ancestry, but the Bacho Kiro individuals had slightly more at 3.4–3.8%. The chromosome segments were considerably longer, suggesting that the Bacho Kiro indi-

MAREK JANTAČ viduals had Neanderthal ancestors as recently The skull of a modern female from Zlatý kůň. as the past six or seven generations — and prob- ably in Europe, not the Middle East. The Zlatý kůň woman’s Neanderthal ances- try goes back considerably longer: 70–80 gen- OLDEST HUMAN DNA erations, or perhaps 2,000–3,000 years, says , a palaeogeneticist at the REVEALS RECENT MPI–EVA who co-led the study. His team could not date the skull accurately because of con- NEANDERTHAL MIXING tamination. But on the basis of its Neanderthal ancestry, Krause suspects it is much more than Ancient human lineages interbred commonly in 45,000 years old, and in the same ballpark as the oldest remains from Bacho Kiro. “We do Europe, as as the Middle East. have, now, some of the oldest human genomes out there,” adds Hajdinjak. By Ewen Callaway and Romania showed no connection to later waves of Europeans, but a 40,000--old Tracing the lineage cientists have sequenced the oldest individual from China is a partial ancestor of The oldest individuals from Bacho Kiro and sapiens DNA on record, show- modern East Asian people. the Zlatý kůň female are not related to later ing that many of Europe’s first humans Like all present-day people whose ancestry Europeans, ancient or modern, meaning that had Neanderthals in their family trees. isn’t solely African, these early Eurasians carried their lineages must have disappeared from the Yet these individuals are not related Neanderthal DNA. Researchers thought that region. But, to their surprise, Hajdinjak and her Sto later Europeans, according to two probably originated from mixing between the colleagues found that the Bacho Kiro people studies of remains dating back more than groups in the Middle East 50,000–60,000 years shared a connection with current East Asians 45,000 years from in Bulgaria and the ago. But a 2015 study3 of the genome of the and Native Americans. Hajdinjak suggests that Czech Republic1,2. 40,000-year-old Romanian individual, from the Bacho Kiro remains represent a population The research adds to growing evidence a site called Peștera cu Oase, held a surprise: that once lived across , but vanished that modern humans mixed regularly with a Neanderthal ancestor in the past four to six from Europe and lived on in Asia. Neanderthals and other extinct relatives, Stone tools and other artefacts common to says , a palaeogeneticist at the “It’s different times, the Initial Upper Palaeolithic — and distinct University of Tel Aviv in Israel. “It’s different from typical Neanderthal and later human times, different places, and it happens again different places, and it toolkits — could be a product of cultural and again.” happens again and again.” exchanges or even mixed populations, says The genetic history of the earliest humans Marie Soressi, an archaeologist at the Univer- in Europe and Asia has been blurred. Although sity of Leiden in the . “We really researchers have sequenced DNA from Nean- generations, suggesting that humans interbred want to better understand what happened, derthals and other extinct human relatives with Neanderthals in Europe, too. what was the historical process and how peace- dating as far back as 430,000 years, there is a It was not clear from the Oase man’s genome ful were those encounters.” scarcity of genetic information from the period whether interbreeding was common in Europe. between around 47,000 and 40,000 years ago, He lived around the time when . Hajdinjak, M. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586- known as the Initial Upper Palaeolithic, and no populations, already sparse, were beginning 021-03335-3 (2021). 2. Prüfer, K. et al. Nature Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/ H. sapiens DNA at all from before this period. to vanish from the region. s41559-021-01443-x (2021). Genomes belonging to humans from The latest genome studies, both published 3. Fu, Q. et al. Nature 524, 216–219 (2015).

Nature | Vol 592 | 15 April 2021 | 339 ©2021 Spri nger Nature Li mited. All ri ghts reserved.