<<

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications

Workshop on durability of composites in a marine environment 23 – 24 August 2012 Nantes

Ifremer, France

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Deep offshore exploitation

Lighter structures Long term behavior Specific properties , thermal insulation

Oceanography

Long term behavior Specific properties Cost

EMR, Navy, …..

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 2 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Deep sea marine environment

Parameters affecting long term durability

o

o

o Chemical composition

o Biological activities

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 3 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Deep sea marine environment

o Hydrostatic Pressure in first approach 1 MPa every 100 meters

In second level : P = 0.0101 z + 0.05 *10 -6 z2 (to take into account water compressibility) 6000 metres = 62.5 MPa

To be more precise depend on temperature, salinity, location …..

P Latitude ( °) 0 30 45 60 90 (MPa) 5 497 496 495 495 494 10 992 991 989 988 987 20 1980 1977 1974 1972 1969 40 3941 3936 3930 3925 3920 60 5885 5877 5870 5862 5854 80 7813 7803 7792 7782 7772 100 9725 9713 9700 9687 9674

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 4 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Deep sea marine environment

o Temperature around 4 °C from 1000 meters

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 5 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Deep sea marine environment

Parameters affecting long term durability

o Pressure

o Temperature

o Chemical composition content, Salinity

o Biological activities

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 6 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

5 Materials

4

2

2 Years

De ionized water

2.3 to 3.3 mm thick

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 7 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Difficult to reach saturation even at 60°C after 2 years

Globally no significant effect of pressure on water uptake

kinetics except for epoxy materials

PE VE EP1 EP2 PEEK .1MPa 10 Mpa .1MPa 10 Mpa .1MPa 10 Mpa .1MPa 10 Mpa .1MPa 10 Mpa 5°C 1.51 3.24 0.69 0.92 15 18.7 13.4 16.4 0.62 0.64 20 °C 4.58 4.47 1.16 1.01 27.5 26.9 20.9 23.8 0.67 1.12 40 °C 12.75 14.32 3.43 2.29 68.1 80 40.3 74.6 1 1.5 60 °C 16.56 17.68 4.6 3.49 109 152.5 120.9 185.1 2.1 1.5

No effect of pressure on mechanical degradation process

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 8 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

20 years of experience on testing composite pressure housings

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 9 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Cylinder failure modes 1500 BUCKLING

1000 Max. Hoop stress Buckling Test data

500 MATERIAL FAILURE Implosion pressure, barsbars pressure,pressure, ImplosionImplosion

0 -2,91E-1 0,02 0,04 0,06 0,08 0,1 0,12 thickness/diameter

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 10 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Creep strains measured at sea, 2500 m depth (3 strain gauges) 12 mm thick glass/epoxy cylinder

7000

6000

5000

4000

3000 HoopHoopmicrostrain microstrain 2000

1000

0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Time, hours Creep buckling occurrence ?

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 11 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Very few fatigue data

Glass epoxy cylinders under hydrostatic pressure 90

80

70

60 no failure % of static static static ofoffailure failure % % 50

40 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Nb of cycles data from EUCLID program

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 12 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Introduction of long term behavior into a new standard for qualification of oceanographic equipment

Instrumented test in order to extrapolate duration limit of qualification

Fatigue test : 10 cycles at Service Pressure

96 hours Creep test at 1.2 SP or 1.1SP (depending on class equipment)

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 13 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Adrien et al Acta Mat. 55-2007

10 to 100 µm ∅

1 to 2 µm thickness

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 14 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Buoyancy application 6000 meters ρ =0.58 Glass epoxy syntactic foam

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 15 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Thermal insulation & Buoyancy application

Long term behavior (> 20 years) under high hydrostatic pressure and high thermal gradient (temperature up to 130 °C)

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 16 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Insulated pipe

Riser tower Glass syntactic polypropylene Glass syntactic polyurethane Glass epoxy syntactic foam Xmas tree ……..

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 17 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Samples of different sizes Water uptake kinetics Pressure up to 30 Mpa Evolution of mechanics & thermal properties Temperature up to 160 °C Long term aging model Natural sea water Up to 10 000 hours of ageing

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 18 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

30 40°C P atm 40°C P 30 MPa 80°C P atm 80°C P 30 MPa

20 2 months 9 months

10 increaseincrease Weight Weight (%) (%)

0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 t (h) 1/2 / h(mm)

Temperature & Pressure coupling effect

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 19 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Water uptake modeling

Durability of composite material for underwater applications 20 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

GSPU 80°C – 14 months

Epoxy syntactic foam (Nautile) 20 years

Durability of composite material for underwater applications 21 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Modeling of thermo-mechanical of GSPP

• Parameter’s determination: Creep tensile test on DMA

100°C

60°C 80°C 40°C 25°C

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 22 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Syntactic foam + macro ballon (∅ >10 cm) Long term behaviour ???

Durability of composite material for underwater applications 23 Context – Previous study – Oceanography – Syntactic foams – Conclusions

Increasing demand for use of composite materials in the offshore domain Important on going experimental programs for developing, in particular, deep sea composite risers Generally low water temperature and important thickness of deep sea structures will minimize the potential effect of water uptake Significant temperature-pressure coupling for syntactic foam TO BE INVESTIGATED Effect of higher pressure Creep buckling under hydrostatic pressure Long term behavior of buoyancy material with macro balloons

Durability of composite material for underwater applications 24 0 MPa

Durability of composite material for underwater applications 25 10 MPa

Durability of composite material for underwater applications 26 30 MPa

Durability of composite material for underwater applications 27 40 MPa

Durability of composite material for underwater applications 28 50 MPa

Durability of composite material for underwater applications 29 0 Mpa After loading

Durability of composite material for underwater applications 30 Durability of composite material for underwater applications 31 Thank you for your attention

Durability of composite materials for underwater applications 32