FREUDENBERG STIFTUNG Informiert

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FREUDENBERG STIFTUNG Informiert FREUDENBERG STIFTUNG informiert The first 20 Years of the Freudenberg Foundation 1984 – 2004 Table of Contents Foreword of the Chairman of the Board of Trustees 3 About this report 9 Integration and immigration 11 Sinti and Roma 29 Young people between school and working life 39 Learning democracy and assuming responsibility in school and the community 55 Employment for mentally ill people 71 Developing local models in selected areas and city districts 81 Developing, supporting and disseminating our projects 95 Annexes 109 Foreword of the Chairman of the Board of Trustees The Freudenberg Foundation, established in 1984, is celebrating its 20th anni- versary this year. We believe this is a good occasion to look back on the work it has done so far. The Foundation was born when members of the Freudenberg family decided to transfer a part of their holdings in the Freudenberg company, which until then had been owned exclusively by family members, to a non-profit foun- dation. Since then the Freudenberg Foundation, having the legal form of a non-profit limited company, has been a partner of the company – albeit with- out voting rights. Günter Freudenberg took the decisive first step when he transferred limited partnership capital shares. According to his request, the Foundation was to concentrate on sociopolitical issues and be managed ac- cording to professional criteria. When the managing bodies were formed, he – so as to set a good example – did not want to be a member himself. The Board of Partners with five members and the Board of Trustees comprising nine persons control the fortunes of the Foundation. The Board of Partners, in which the company holds only two places, appoints the Board of Trustees and, together with the latter, the Executive Director. Apart from that, its work is limited to defining the financial framework every year and it has the final de- cision when the Board of Trustees wants to make any fundamental changes in the Foundation’s program or guidelines. That, however, has never occurred in the past two decades. The objectives of the Foundation – as is the case in most statutes of foundations – are formulated only in a very general manner. Accordingly, the Foundation’s objective is to promote the sciences and edu- cation as well as peaceful coexistence in society. Based on its statutes, the Foundation also can do „charitable“ work. Therefore, the first task facing the Board of Trustees twenty years ago was to accurately define the Foundation’s fields of activity. The thematic profile created in this way during the Founda- tion’s first two years has proven to be both open to necessary developments and stable at one and the same time. The Board of Trustees was able to continue the thematic interests and expe- riences of the company and individual partners. Thus, the areas of interest pursued by the Foundation were not chosen „out of the blue“ but can look back on a long tradition. An outstanding example is the so-called „Ettlinger Kreis“ founded by Hans Freudenberg, which was headed first by him and then by Hermann Freudenberg for 20 years up until the middle of the 1970s. The most significant topic of interest of this circle of entrepreneurs and scientists, which, by the way, was not very popular with industrial associations, was 3 reforming the general and vocational education of young people. The „Ettlinger Kreis“ was succeeded by the „Stiftung Ettlinger Gespräche“ within the „Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft” (Donors’ Association for the Promotion of Humanities and Sciences in Germany), which also was headed by Hermann Freudenberg. This foundation was interested in the top- ic of immigration and integration and to this end developed a model project for the vocational and social integration of primarily „foreign youth“, which was realized in Weinheim with funds from the Freudenberg company in 1979. Based on the pattern of the „Weinheim Project“, the program of RAA, short for „Regionale Arbeitsstellen zur Förderung ausländischer Kinder und Jugendlicher“ (regional centers for the promotion of foreign children and ado- lescents) was developed and built up in nine cities in the Ruhr district between 1980 and 1984 with funds from the Federal government, state and municipal governments as well as the „Stiftung Ettlinger Gespräche“. When the Freudenberg Foundation was established, the Board of Trustees decided to continue this thematic tradition and, thus, also took over the projects of the „Stiftung Ettlinger Gespräche“ in its program. It had, so to say, a flying start. The same holds true for another area of concentration of the Foundation: Pro- fessor Rudolf Freudenberg, who had emigrated to England, proposed open- ing psychiatric wards and finding ways to reintegrate mentally ill people in their communities. He was particularly concerned with the question as to how these people could find work, and he was able to prove the feasibility of these suggestions on the basis of practical models. Therefore, in the past two decades, the Foundation has dedicated its work to the following five areas. Firstly, the integration of immigrants and cultural mi- norities in a society that has become an immigration society as well as the hostile and discriminating reactions facing them. Secondly, the promotion of a democratic culture, since this is a prerequisite for peaceful coexistence in society. In this respect, the main focus – in a positive sense – is on promoting projects with the objective of teaching democracy and individual assumption of responsibility in schools and communities and – in a negative sense – of combating extremist, above all right-wing extremist, influences on the every- day culture in which young people grow up. Thirdly, the Foundation concen- trates on assisting young people who, particularly due to social discrimination, encounter problems at school and in the system for attaining vocational quali- fications. Fourthly, reintegrating mentally ill people into working life as well as increasing society’s awareness of their specific problems. This area has achieved numerous significant goals in the past 20 years and will no longer be continued as a separate area of activity. The other three main areas of activity will continue to characterize the Foun- dation’s profile in the future. Assuming it is correct that foundations should be active primarily „anti-cyclically“, i.e. that they are not supposed to do what is 4 being politically promoted anyway, then the areas of interest defined by the Board of Trustees when the Foundation was founded were well chosen be- cause they still respond to sociopolitical deficits today: inadequate policy of immigration and integration, insufficient democratization policies, in particu- lar in eastern Germany, and insufficient education and vocational training poli- cies. The Foundation can be glad and also a little proud of the fact that it did not give up its areas of interest, even when only very few people were inter- ested in them. Up until today – and despite the PISA study – such topics as youth, education and vocational training do not enjoy political priority. The in- fluences of right-wing extremism on everyday life no longer rate news cover- age, even though the same misdeeds as before are occurring every single day. Although the linguistic and social integration of immigrant families is being dis- cussed in public again, no appropriate action is being taken. At first glance, it may seem that a foundation which allocates between Û 1.7–2 million per year is trying to realize a confusingly broad thematic program. Yet, in fact, the three areas overlap and are closely interconnected. All areas are concerned with the problems of social discrimination and lack of recog- nition. Moreover, children and teenagers are the center of attention: the Foun- dation strives to promote the social, linguistic, educational and vocational in- tegration of the next generation. Based on our past experience, this calls for a broad approach that encompasses the families, the neighborhood and sur- rounding environment, the institutions responsible for education and assis- tance as well as the possible occupations and employment market. A fre- quently quoted wise saying claims that only a couple is needed to bring a child into this world but a whole village is needed for the child to be raised well. Based on this maxim, it can be concluded that if the village, the city district, the „social environment“ of the family gets into difficulties, this will affect the young children and youth. For this reason, we have decided – as a fifth area of interest – to concentrate our efforts on individual towns or city districts where there is great need of development. We want to apply the experiences gained in our other three areas of interest there and contribute to the develop- ment of local models of urban renewal as well as the intensification of „inte- gration potentials“. We hope that in this way the interrelationship between the three main areas of interest – integration, vocational qualification, learning democracy – will have an actual effect on the persons concerned. Although a description of its thematic areas of interest and sociopolitical ob- jectives is certainly important when characterizing the Freudenberg Foun- dation, its work gains true color only when one looks at „how“ these objec- tives are realized. The basis for this is formed by the guidelines, which we have not had to change in the past twenty years. Accordingly, the Foundation is primarily an „operational“ organization. In other words, even though it accepts 5 applications and supports interesting projects, it does not wait for others to present their ideas but develops projects itself together with its partner or- ganizations. In doing so, it responds to innovation gaps caused by bureau- cracies and tries to find solutions by developing practical models.
Recommended publications
  • Agnes C. Mueller Professor of German & Comparative Literature [email protected] (803) 414-0316
    Agnes C. Mueller Professor of German & Comparative Literature [email protected] (803) 414-0316 Curriculum Vitae EMPLOYMENT University of South Carolina 2014- Professor of German & Comparative Literature 2015-2020 College of Arts & Sciences Distinguished Professor of the Humanities 2017-2021 Director, Program in Global Studies 2019- Core Faculty, Program in Jewish Studies 2001- Affiliate Faculty, Women’s and Gender Studies 2005-2013 Associate Professor 2001-2005 Assistant Professor 1998-2001 Visiting Assistant Professor University of Georgia 1997-1998 Instructor Vanderbilt University 1994-1997 Teaching Assistant EDUCATION 1997 Vanderbilt University Ph.D. in German Literature Nashville, Tennessee 1993 Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität M.A. in German and Munich, Germany Comparative Literature 1 Agnes C. Mueller ADMINISTRATIVE LEADERSHIP (selection): 2021 Chair, External Review Team (3 members), AQAD Review of Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at R1 University 2017-2021 Director, Program in Global Studies. Directing a new interdisciplinary BA program with nearly 200 majors and 5 different content areas; single-handedly scheduling courses from other units across the university, meeting with students and prospective students and parents, advisement, devising new curriculum, building a core faculty group. Promoting program within university and outside, including devising MoUs with new European and global university partners. Advocating for/hiring of Associate and Assistant Directors (both in place since 2019). Grew program from 18 majors to nearly 200 majors (fall 2019) with modest budget. Directing all outreach and presenting to University Board of Visitors, to South Carolina school district representatives, to alumni, and seeking future donors in collaboration with CAS Development. Devising and scheduling monthly Global Café events (with notables from industry, state department, leaders in health and education).
    [Show full text]
  • REFORM, RESISTANCE and REVOLUTION in the OTHER GERMANY By
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository RETHINKING THE GDR OPPOSITION: REFORM, RESISTANCE AND REVOLUTION IN THE OTHER GERMANY by ALEXANDER D. BROWN A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Modern Languages School of Languages, Cultures, Art History and Music University of Birmingham January 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The following thesis looks at the subject of communist-oriented opposition in the GDR. More specifically, it considers how this phenomenon has been reconstructed in the state-mandated memory landscape of the Federal Republic of Germany since unification in 1990. It does so by presenting three case studies of particular representative value. The first looks at the former member of the Politbüro Paul Merker and how his entanglement in questions surrounding antifascism and antisemitism in the 1950s has become a significant trope in narratives of national (de-)legitimisation since 1990. The second delves into the phenomenon of the dissident through the aperture of prominent singer-songwriter, Wolf Biermann, who was famously exiled in 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Examines the Rhetoric of East German Domestic and Foreign Politics and How the Issue of Race and Racism Was Handled
    This thesis examines the rhetoric of East German domestic and foreign politics and how the issue of race and racism was handled. It covers the time period from the early 1950s through the 1960s, while contextualizing East German politics with German politics of the Weimar and Nazi eras. Accounts of racism towards Jews, Slavs and groups from Africa, Latin America and South East Asia are examined. The thesis attempts to show that in the self-proclaimed anti-racist state of the German Democratic Republic (GDR), racism marked both domestic and foreign politics and greatly influenced the Cold War politics of East Germany. The racism that was tolerated and promoted in the early period of the GDR still influences Germany today. 1 I give permission for public access to my thesis and for any copying to be done at the discretion of the archives librarian and/or the College librarian. Lauren Stillman 06.01.06 2 Cold War Dictatorship: Racism in the German Democratic Republic By Lauren A. Stillman A thesis presented to the faculty of Mount Holyoke College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors International Relations Program Mount Holyoke College South Hadley, Massachusetts 5 May, 2006 3 Acknowledgments The following people have been instrumental in helping me complete this work. Without their support and encouragement I might still be stuck in an archive in Berlin, fascinated by all the old German documents that I could not decipher. First and foremost, thank you Jeremy King for your kind patience, steadfast encouragement and incredible input.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Historical and Contemporary Berlin
    Course Title Cities, Communities, and Urban Life: Exploring Historical and Contemporary Berlin Course Number GERM-UA 9293-001 (2721); HIST-UA 9460-001 (2777); SOC-UA 9460-001 (2776) Summer 2018 Syllabus last updated on 28-May-2018 Instructor Contact Information Dr. Martin Jander [email protected] Course Details Wednesdays, 1.30pm to 4.30pm Thursdays, 1.30pm to 4.30pm Location: NYU Berlin Academic Center, Room: “Pankow” (BLAC 204) and many other locations in the city of Berlin. Prerequisites Interest in the history of Germany and Berlin; interest in questions of public memory and urban design; motivation to engage with sites, their development, meaning and architecture; willingness to contribute to discussions during excursions as well as in class. Units earned 4 Course Description Berlin was a focal point of 20th century German, European, and international history. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, the city has undergone profound transformation, redefining both its relationship with the past andSAMPLE its identity in the present. This course will introduce you to historical and contemporary Berlin by exploring key sites connected with the Imperial Germany, Weimar Republic, the Third Reich, the division of Germany, as well as the post-Wall period. Organized chronologically, the course will give you the opportunity to gradually expand your knowledge of the city and its history. At the same time, a major focus will be the overlaying of past and present in Berlin’s cityscape and the processes of repurposing and memorialization that these illustrate. In addition to the spatial experience of the sites, we will use testimonial accounts, historiographical texts as well as artistic responses to critically engage with the palimpsest of Berlin’s urban structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany After 1945: N
    m www.amadeu-antonio-stiftung.de/eng S azi Germany after 1945: n eo- n a Society confrontS nd a antiSemitiSm, raciSm, m, S aci r and neo-naziSm m, S emiti S nti a S onfront c Society a fter 1945: a Germany An exhibition by Germany after 1945: A Society Confronts Antisemitism, Racism, and Neo-Nazism An exhibition by the Amadeu Antonio Foundation (Catalog) This exhibition has been generously funded by: The Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future” (EVZ) was established in 2000, primarily to make payments to former forced laborers. The payments programs were com- pleted in 2007. The Foundation’s capital of EUR 5.2 billion was provided by the German gov- ernment and German industry. With the support of international partner organizations, by the end of 2006 the Foundation had managed to distribute EUR 4.4 billion to 1.66 million former forced laborers and other victims of the Nazi regime in almost 100 countries. The Foundation EVZ supports international programs and projects with approximately EUR 7.5 million per year in the following activity areas: a critical examination of history, working for human rights, and a commitment to the victims of National Socialism. The Freudenberg Foundation was established in 1984 by members of the Freudenberg family. The Freudenberg Company was founded in the middle of the 19th century in Weinheim, Southern Germany, and now operates worldwide as a 100% family-owned group of com- panies. Because of their Jewish heritage, some members of the family were persecuted during National Socialism and had to flee Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Psychology and Social Change: Research, History
    More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com P1: JtR 0521826187agg.xml CB814B/Pillemer 0 521 82618 7 April 25, 2005 4:37 More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com Developmental Psychology and Social Change What is the unique mission of developmental psychology? How has it evolved historically? What are its current challenges? The chapters in this collection present the view that research, history, and policy are essential and interlocking components of a mature developmental psy- chology. Patterns of human development differ markedly across histor- ical epochs, cultures, and social circumstances. Major societal changes examined by contributing authors – the advent of universal compulsory schooling, the adoption of a one-child policy in China, U.S. policy shifts in healthcare, welfare and child care – present “natural experiments” in social design. Authors challenge the idea of a clear distinction between basic and applied developmental research. In sharp contrast with the view that science is value-neutral, developmental psychologists have from the outset pursued the betterment of children and families through educational, child-care, and health initiatives. An historical perspec- tive reveals the beneficial, if sometimes contentious, interplay between empirical research and social programs and policies. David B. Pillemer is the Dr. Samuel E. Paul Professor of Developmental Psychology at the University of New Hampshire. His research specialty is autobiographical memory across the life span. He has studied memory development in children, memories of adolescence, “flashbulb” memo- ries of momentous events, and memories of educational experiences. Sheldon H. White is John Lindsey Professor of Psychology Emeritus at Harvard University. A developmental psychologist, he has done re- search on children’s learning, attention, and memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. Xxiv/Xxv (2018/2019) No 31–32
    THE INTERNATIONAL NEWSLETTER OF COMMUNIST STUDIES Der Internationale Newsletter der Kommunismusforschung La newsletter internationale des recherches sur le communisme Международный бюллетень исторических исследований коммунизма La Newsletter Internacional de Estudios sobre el Comunismo A Newsletter Internacional de Estudos sobre o Comunismo Edited by Bernhard H. Bayerlein and Gleb J. Albert VOL. XXIV/XXV (2018/2019) NO 31–32 Published by The European Workshop of Communist Studies With Support of the Institute of Social Movements and the Library of the Ruhr University Bochum ISSN 1862-698X http://incs.ub.rub.de The International Newsletter of Communist Studies XXIV/XXV (2018/19), nos. 31-32 2 Editors Bernhard H. Bayerlein Institute of Social Movements (ISB), University of Bochum, Germany [email protected] / [email protected] Gleb J. Albert Department of History, University of Zurich [email protected] Board of Correspondents Lars Björlin (Stockholm) Ottokar Luban (Berlin) Kasper Braskén (Åbo) Kevin McDermott (Sheffield) Hernán Camarero (Buenos Aires) Brendan McGeever (London) Cosroe Chaqueri † (Paris) Kevin Morgan (Manchester) Sonia Combe (Paris) Timur Mukhamatulin (New Brunswick) Mathieu Denis (Paris/Montréal) Manfred Mugrauer (Wien) Jean-François Fayet (Fribourg) Maria Luisa Nabinger (Rio de Janeiro) Jan Foitzik (Berlin) José Pacheco Pereira (Lisbon) Daniel Gaido (Córdoba, Argentina) Fredrik Petersson (Åbo/Stockholm) José Gotovitch (Bruxelles) Adriana Petra (Buenos Aires) Sobhanlal Datta Gupta (Calcutta) Kimmo Rentola
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping Future Discourse About Xenophobia, Anti-Semitism and Hate Speecht
    Shaping Future Discourse about Xenophobia, Anti-Semitism and Hate Speecht 08-10 September 2020 1 Tuesday, 08-09-2020 „Media, holocaust and generation Z: Time for new approaches“ 17:30 - 18:00 Greeting & Opening Remarks » Susanne Glass 18:30 - 19:15 Talk: 3 Generations 3 Perspectives » Holocaust survivor *requested CET » Jenny Havemann CET » 2nd generation: Michael Shubitz » JPC: Dan Meridor » 3rd generation: Keren Knoll » Susanne Wasum-Rainer » Elishav Rabinovith » Hannah Liko » Barbara Glück » Jean-Daniel Ruch » Ron Huldai » Moderator: Eliyah Havemann » Ulrich Wilhelm » Charlotte Knobloch 19:15 - 20:15 “Alliances Against Antisemitism & » Sawsan Chebli CET Hate Speech”, Discussion » Roger Schawinski 18:00 - 18:15 Keynote Speech » Reuven Rivlin *requested » Ksenia Svetlova CET » Nikodemus C. Schnabel » Rabbi Dov Lipman » Alana Baranov 18:15 - 18:30 » Mati Kochavi Presenting “Eva’s Stories Project” » CET Moderator: Markus Spillmann 2 3 *Program is subject to change Speakers Susanne Glass Jenny Havemann Hannah Liko Jean Daniel Ruch Dr. Susanne Glass is a Jenny Havemann is an Hannah Liko is the Austrian Jean-Daniel Ruch is the Swiss political scientist and one of entrepreneur and the founder Ambassador to Israel since Ambassador in Israel since the founders of the Startup & CEO of GIIN (German- 2019. From 2013-2017, 2016. He joined the Swiss Media Summit. Dr. Glass is Israeli Innovation Network) she worked at the Office of Foreign Service in 1992 after the bureau chief and TV- as well as the Co-Founder the Secretary General for having worked three years chief correspondent for ARD, of Startup Media Tel Aviv. Foreign Affairs, MFA. She in the Ministry of Defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas City, Missouri Program
    GERMAN STUDIES ASSOCIATION Thirty-Eighth Annual Conference September 18–21, 2014 Kansas City, Missouri Program of the Thirty-Eighth Annual Conference German Studies Association September 18–21, 2014 Kansas City, Missouri Westin Kansas City at Crown Center German Studies Association Main Office: 1200 Academy Street Kalamazoo, MI 49006-3295 USA Tel.: (269) 267-7585 Fax: (269) 337-7251 www.thegsa.org e-mail: [email protected] Technical Support: [email protected] President Suzanne Marchand (2013–2014) Louisiana State University Vice President Irene Kacandes (2013–2014) Dartmouth College Secretary-Treasurer Gerald A. Fetz University of Montana Executive Director David E. Barclay Kalamazoo College GSA Board: Elizabeth Ametsbichler, University of Montana (2015) Joy H. Calico, Vanderbilt University (2016) Alice H. Cooper, University of Mississippi (2015) Geoff Eley, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (2014) Randall Halle, University of Pittsburgh (2016) Leslie Morris, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities (2014) Janet A. Ward, University of Oklahoma (2015) Dorothee Wierling, Forschungsstelle für Zeitgeschichte, Universität Hamburg (2014) S. Jonathan Wiesen, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale (2016) Stephen Brockmann, Carnegie Mellon University, ex officio non-voting (2014) Sabine Hake, University of Texas at Austin, ex officio non-voting © Copyright 2014 by German Studies Association Institutional Members American Friends of the Alexander Leo Baeck Institute, New York von Humboldt Foundation McGill University American Friends of the Max
    [Show full text]
  • New Perspectives on the German Democratic Republic
    Introduction New Perspectives on the GDR A Plea for a Paradigm Shift Enrico Heitzer, Martin Jander, Ane a Kahane, and Patrice G. Poutrus i t took some time in the (pre-unifi cation) Federal Republic of Germany for Inot only researchers but also educators, museums, and memorial policy- makers to begin asking critical questions. But there have been debates about National Socialism and its a ereff ects since 1945. What started hesitatingly and then assumed increasing clarity and importance were questions about how many people were involved in criminal acts; the successes or failures of denazifi cation; the comprehensiveness of compensation for Nazi wrongdoing; whether every victim group had been recognized; and whether the state and its citizens were meeting their material and moral obligations to Israel, among other issues. At fi rst tentatively and then with increasing urgency, historians and other researchers—through their investigations and the ensuing public debate—completed the work initiated by the Allies at the Nuremberg Trials and the twelve tribunals that followed. Critical inquiry on the a ereff ects of National Socialism but also ear- lier periods in German history, including colonialism, continue. Whether football, the secret service, antisemitism, medicine, or immigration policy, no institution, phenomenon, subject, or concept should be excluded from critical scrutiny. The destruction of law and civilization and the establish- ment of megalomaniacal nationalism, racism, antisemitism, and other movements opposed to minorities and modernity as such demand that AFTER AUSCHWITZ – 1 – The Difficult Legacies of the GDR Edited by Enrico Heitzer, Martin Jander, Anetta Kahane, and Patrice G. Poutrus https://www.berghahnbooks.com/title/HeitzerAfter Enrico Heitzer, Martin Jander, Ane a Kahane, and Patrice G.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonprofit Security Grant Program
    Nonprofit Security Grant Program Threat Incident Report: January 2019 to Present November 15, 2020 (Updated 02/05/2021) Prepared By: Rob Goldberg, Senior Director, Legislative Affairs [email protected] The below Threat Chronology is intended to assist applicants in responding to the “Threat” question in Part III (A) of the Investment Justification (“making the case”): The applicant should discuss the identification and substantiation of prior threats or attacks against the organization or a closely related organization by a terrorist organization, network, or cell (this would also include Violent Homegrown Extremists). Note: Proofs should include any findings from a previously conducted risk assessment, police findings, and/or insurance claims specific to the location. Absent direct threats, a sub-applicant may substantiate the threat through the public record, as discussed below. Recommendations (in order of priority): In answering this question, a sub-applicant should (in order or priority): 1. Describe specific terror (or violent homegrown extremist) incidents, threats, hate crimes, and/or related vandalism, trespass, intimidation, or destruction of property that have targeted its property, membership, or personnel. Note: This may also include a specific event or circumstance that impacted an affiliate or member of the organization’s system or network. 2. Report on incidents/threats that have occurred in the community and/or State where the organization is located. 3. Reference the public record regarding incidents/threats against similar or like institutions at home or abroad. Note: With respect to referencing the public record, there is limited working space in the IJ, so sub- applicants should be selective in choosing appropriate examples to incorporate into the response: Events that are most recent, geographically proximate, and closely related to their type or circumstance of their organization or are of such magnitude or breadth that they create a significant existential threat to the Jewish community at large.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Ruman Allison Thesis.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF GERMAN “TEMPERATE BRUTALITY”: THE AfD AND RIGHT-WING EXTREMISM IN POSTWAR GERMANY ALLISON RUMAN SPRING 2020 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for baccalaureate degrees in German, Political Science, and Classics & Ancient Mediterranean Studies with honors in German Reviewed and approved* by the following: Jens-Uwe Guettel Associate Professor in History and Religious Studies Thesis Supervisor and Honors Adviser Gretchen Casper Associate Professor of Political Science and Asian Studies Faculty Reader * Electronic approvals are on file. i ABSTRACT Das Ziel dieser Arbeit ist, die Entwicklung des Rechtextremismus in Nachkriegsdeutschland aufzuzeichnen. Die Arbeit beginnt mit einem Vergleich der von NSDAP Reichstagsabgeordneten benutzten Sprache in den Reichstagsdebatten von 1928 und Reden von AfD-Abgeordneten und anderen höherrangigen AfD-Vertretern seit dem Zusammentreten des jetzigen Bundestages im Jahr 2018. Durch diesen Vergleich werden die rhetorischen Ähnlichkeiten zwischen Vertretern beider Parteien und ihren Überzeugungen deutlich. Der erste Teil dieser Arbeit ist eine Analyse des Rechtextremismus seit dem Ende des zweiten Weltkrieges bis zum Aufkommen der AfD Anfang 2013. Dieser Teil basiert auf Zeitungs- und Sekundärliteraturrecherche und bietet eine umfassende Zusammenfassung des Rechtextremismus in Nachkriegsdeutschland. Nach 1949 hatten mehrere rechtsextreme Parteien kleinere Erfolge in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, n allerdings wurden keine ihrer Vertreter in den Bundestag gewählt. Die Entwicklung dieser Parteien wurde durch mehrere Geschehnisse beeinflusst, einschließlich der relativ neuen rhetorischen Abgrenzung der „Neuen Rechten“ vom traditionellen „NS Sprech“ und der zumindest teilweise (jedoch nicht in Björn Höckes „Flügel“ der AfD) vorhandenen Bereitschaft, die fortbestehende Verantwortung der Deutschen für die Verbrechen der Nazis anzuerkennen.
    [Show full text]