DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Public Involvement Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Public Involvement Summary Report 2019 Public Involvement Summary Report Open-Ended Comments Are there important locations missing from the current proposed Rose Lane Vision that you think we should consider? Why? ................................................................................................................................. 2 How would the Rose Lane Project personally affect you? ......................................................................... 23 Is there anything else you would like to share with the Rose Lane project team? .................................... 72 1 Are there important locations missing from the current proposed Rose Lane Vision that you think we should consider? Why? You definitely need to experiment before you re-design Red Lanes, bike lanes, etc., in outer East - NE Glisan is a perfect example of why it is not a beneficial to anyone with the elimination of one lane each way - all it has done is create a driving restriction for drivers. Not enough locations east of 82nd Ave. Powell Blvd, Barbur Blvd. I know, theyre ODOT. I support working on them. Strongly support - with the condition that you look at E of 82nd Ave. Yes, there are several locations missing including E. PDX. Specially Powell 122nd -> 162 East County. A lot of people travel, live, work, and need access to faster ways to get home. Dedicate bus lanes in East County will incentivize people to ride more. Put the money into homeless services, are you crazy? No one gives a shit about kool aid bus lanes. Get a grip TV Highway. Put in high capacity express buses from the suburbs and across suburbs to reduce travel time instead of routing all suburban buses to max. Foster Rd at 50th westbound, Foster at Holgate westbound, Foster at 82nd, and Foster at 92nd eastbound could use signal prioritization, jump ques, and other features of the Rose Lane Project. More of 122nd should be prioritized for transit as Airport Way is an important area of opportunity and jobs for many residents of SE Portland and Clackamas. Expanding the proposed areas along 122nd will ensure that working families have additional time, money, and resources to spend with family and provide stable households within marginalized areas of Portland, thus helping to serve equity concerns along the spatial and socioeconomic margins of the city. Yes, every other arterial with a frequent bus or streetcar line!! I would like the city to reconsider the the bike lanes on Foster. I think more people would be served by bus lanes and safer crossings for bikes and pedestrians. I bike in this neighborhood often and don't use the Foster bike lanes, opting instead for the greenways and other side streets. no Along Front Avenue/Route 30/Bridge Road (to the St. Johns Bridge). Residents of St. Johns do not have a frequent-service/rapid transit option for getting to and from the City Center. I live in Happy Valley. I work out every morning on my way to work and have many kid activities I'm trying to get to in the evening. This change adds 20-25 mins to my home commute everyday. Very frustrating!! Traffic here is congested as can be. Taking away lanes from the majority to give to transit helps transit, but enough people are transit-resistant to where this is not viable. The hobo situation on transit makes my family outright ANXIOUS. Like, "I talk about this in therapy" anxious, to be in Portland. They won't ride because it's not safe. I watched someone strung out get ejected from the green line this very morning. Until you make it safer, I don't want to give up lanes to you, especially outside the city core. North Portland! Make 82nd Ave a higher priority, converting outside travel lane to BAT. High equity need, high pedestrian demand, and great opportunity to transform from auto-centric to mult-modal 2 Barbur needs to be a high priority. So much room available, many lines affected. Holgate especially as it approaches 17th would greatly effect roll in of buses finishing shift. Minutes saved there are often overtime minutes can have a dramatic effect on service budget. Signal priority. Get buses ahead of traffic, reduces conflict with all modes and capitalizes on benefit of rose lanes. Are you going to do anything in Beaverton? All of downtown 82nd Ave is home to some of the most diverse census tracts in the state of Oregon and provides access to opportunity of education, employment, and travel via PDX. I'd strongly encourage and support Rose Lane treatment along 82nd quickly as well as east-west routes into East Portland. Hawthorne Bridge and Belmont Bridge. More coverage in The Numbers/East PDX and the southern reaches of SE inside 82. Coverage for north of 84 and east of 205. Not everybody has the luxury to ride a bike or take public transit. Most people have to drive a car. The city wants more density but falsely assumes every person can ride a bike or commute by public transit. Those elected "officials" are being extremely closed minded. Reminds me of the movie "Dumb and Dumber". We shouldn't have any four lane road that doesn't have a dedicated bus lane in it. The Cesar Chavez Blvd corridor, because it's an important connection that's unreliable at present Barbur. Easily room available. Greatest effect on multiple lines. Buffer for bikes. Slooooooow down cars. Suburbs This plan covers the areas where I have been frustratingly delayed on a bus. Percent times are a poor way to measure the significance of changes- 6 minutes is a minor difference even when it is 20%. What matters is reliability of the time it will take- this project may improve that as well but it hasn't been discussed in your presentations NW 10th and 11th in the Pearl District. Broadway between Interstate and MLK. These are critical links with high ridership and frequent delays. It looks like a thorough and well-considered set of projects from the get-go. Locations should be selected based on a combination of bus frequency and potential for delays from SOV traffic; by all indications that appears to be the case. SE Portland - #75, #19 Barbur Boulevard inbound to downtown from about Hamilton to Water. The buses get stuck behind all the cars waiting to get on the Ross Island Bridge. They can't go over a lane and pass them because they need to get to the bus stop. SE Portland, #19 and #75 bus lines 20+ suggested pilot programs? Seriously? PBOT needs to select 4 and do the pilot program and see what happens. Target two easy ones, and a hard one, and get the data back. Greeley. the 25 bus gets extremely backed up approaching adidas campus, and there are two lanes, one could be alloted to transit only I believe the bridges need to be a higher priority. Lombard Ave - 75 is needed for St Johns growth 3 The fact that SE Powell is not your #1 priority for SE East-West route is crazy. North-South routes are desperately needed on the East Side and yet I only see one route inside of 82nd. Overall it is a really stupid idea to put high-traffic bus lanes on the same streets as cars. Waze and other Maps apps will simply route cars onto residential streets if you do this. Instead you should put dedicated bus lanes and bike lanes on the same streets, offset a block or two from the primary car streets. 33rd Ave NE between Sandy and Killingsworth could benefit from a Rose Lane. It is nearly always backed up during rush hour (AM and PM) which causes sometimes intense delays on the 70 bus and has caused me to miss a transfer in the past. You are creating havoc with your ideas making it unsafe There are probably more opportunities for intersection-based focused improvements in outer portland. Every section of every bus route in the central city. Delays downtown ripple out across the entire system. Taking out Hawthorne and Belmont is just not a good idea. With Foster reduced to one lane, these are major transportation arteries now. I'm a full supporter of more busses, more frequent stops, and having them go later into the night. But you can't just remove some streets. Yes, Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy approaching SW 30th Ave headed eastbound during AM rush hour as it routinely backs up. Also depending on SW Corridor improvements in this plan means at least 6-8 years with significant rust hour delays in SW Portland - there is plenty of room on the roadway right now on Barbur and ODOT shares some responsibility for making that roadway work better than it does right now. Overall the plan seems good. The bridges and east-side approaches seem to be the worst delays NE Gleason Parking in the neighborhoods...dozens of cars are driven into the city along Belmont, then parked in the neighborhoods at the bus stops. We need OUTER park and ride facilities to allow people to keep their cars out of the city and take advantage of this transit change. I-5 bus routes (e.g., 96, Ctran) Streetcar priority should extend north to Everett, since it currently gets caught up in traffic between Burnside and Glisan. Transit priority on NE Broadway should extend through the I-5 Rose Quarter Interchange. Expedite the 82nd Ave and Powell proposals Consider that many of the City of Portland employees live in more affordable suburbs - Gresham, Clackamas, Troutdale, Fairview, Hillsboro, Aloha. If these commuters have a situation similar to mine where there are multiple stops to make each morning (childcare, schools, etc.) public transportation may not be an option for them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PBOT's Strategic Plan
    1 MOVING TO OUR FUTURE 2019-2022 2019-2022 PBOT’s Strategic Plan Moving to Our Future Index Letter from the Commissioner and Director ................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 3 How we will use this plan ................................................................... 7 What PBOT stands for ........................................................................ 9 Transportation justice ...................................................................... 12 One bureau, one mission ................................................................ 18 Goal 1: Safety ..................................................................................... 21 Goal 2: Moving People and Goods.................................................. 27 Goal 3: Asset Management .............................................................. 33 Appendix ............................................................................................ 44 Saving Lives, Saving Time, Saving Money Dear Portlanders, When we ask you what your top issues are related to getting around Portland, three answers lead the pack: safety, congestion, and road maintenance. In a recent survey, nine out of 10 Portlanders cited these three issues as their top priorities. Given these concerns, we think you will be pleased with Moving to Our Future, the strategic plan that will guide our work at the Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT) for the next three years. It’s built around
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Chapter 8 Moving Forward Together
    PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Chapter 8 Moving Forward Together June 29, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose and background ................................................................................................................ 1 8.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 Connecting Our Shared Values and Vision for the Future: Setting a Course for Transportation 3 8.2 Planning and programs ......................................................................................................... 6 8.2.1 Local Implementation .................................................................................................... 6 8.2.2 Metro’s Regional Programs ............................................................................................ 7 8.2.2.1 Civil Rights and Environmental Justice program .................................................... 7 8.2.2.2 Regional Transportation Safety Program ............................................................... 8 8.2.2.3 Regional Active Transportation Program ............................................................... 9 8.2.2.4 Regional Freight Program ....................................................................................... 9 8.2.2.5 Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) Program ............... 9 8.2.2.6 Regional Travel Options (RTO) and Safe Routes to School Programs .................. 10 8.2.2.7 Air Quality and Climate
    [Show full text]
  • NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Publications and Presentations Planning 6-24-2014 Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Jenny H. Liu Portland State University, [email protected] Zakari Mumuni Portland State University Matt Berggren Portland State University Matt Miller University of Utah Arthur C. Nelson University of Utah SeeFollow next this page and for additional additional works authors at: https:/ /pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac Part of the Transportation Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Liu, Jenny H.; Mumuni, Zakari; Berggren, Matt; Miller, Matt; Nelson, Arthur C.; and Ewing, Reid, "Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon" (2014). Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations. 124. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson, and Reid Ewing This report is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Do TODs Make a Difference? Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson & Reid Ewing Portland State University 6/24/2014 ______________________________________________________________________________ DO TODs MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 of 35 Section 1-INTRODUCTION 2 of 35 ______________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1-INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aura Burnside
    URBANWORKSREALESTATE.COM / 503.228.3080 FOR LEASE RESTAURANT / RETAIL / SERVICE AURA BURNSIDE 55 NE GRAND AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR 97232 NEW MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED ON E. BURNSIDE BETWEEN GRAND AVE AND MLK JR. BLVD. TOTAL // 10,000 SF RANGE // 640 - 8,800 SF (DIVISIBLE) KIA HARTLEY / NICOLE ONDER / 503.228.3080 THE AURA // 1 AURA BURNSIDE ADDRESS // 55 NE GRAND AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR 97232 DELIVERY // Q2 2017 USES // RETAIL / SERVICE RETAIL / RESTAURANT RENTABLE TOTAL // 10,000 SF SF RANGE // 640 - 8,800 SF NEW CENTRAL EASTSIDE DEVELOPMENT The Aura is under development on E Burnside, between NE MLK Jr. Blvd. and NE Grand Ave in The Burnside Bridgehead, one of Portland’ most walkable and desirable neighborhoods. The mixed-use apartment and retail building features amenities that include landscaped rooftop fire pit and activity area with City and Mt Hood views, clubhouse with designer kitchen, bike lounge with lockers, grilling stations, plus on-site wine and bike storage facilities. GROUND FLOOR RETAIL SPACES Retail spaces front MLK Jr Blvd, E Burnside & NE Grand, all of which enjoy high traffic counts and strong walkability scores. Suites offer glass roll-up doors, 17 ft ceilings and space for outdoor seating. E. BURNSIDE & NE MLK BLVD THE AURA // 2 FLOOR PLAN << E.COUCH << SUITE #7 640 SF SUITE #6 683 SF LU# 14-169513 DZM Enlarged Plan - Ground Floor Arcade Section 4: >> NE GRAND AVE >> >> AVE >> NE GRAND << NE MLK JR BLVD << << JR BLVD << NE MLK Retail/ Retail/ Retail/ Commercial Commercial Commercial ne martinlutherboulevard king, jr. SUITE #1 SUITE #2 SUITE #3 SUITE #4 SUITE #5 3,800 SF 1,270 SF 1,270 SF 1,233 SF 1,227 SF ne grand avenue >> E.BURNSIDE STREET >> e burnside street arcade elevation BURNSIDE ELEVATION THE AURA // 3 AURA BURNSIDE E.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit a History of Public Transit in Portland
    Hilary Pfeifer Meredith Dittmar PUBLIC TRANSIT A history of public transit in Portland Melody Owen Mark Richardson Smith Kristin Mitsu Shiga Chandra Bocci trimet.org/history Traveling through time Dear Reader, Transit plays a critical role in providing options for traveling throughout the region. It connects people to work, school, recreational destinations and essential services. It’s not just a commuter service. It’s a community asset. And the benefits extend far beyond those who ride. TriMet’s transit system is recognized as a national leader for its connection to land use. By linking land-use planning and transit, we have helped create livable communities, vibrant neighborhoods and provide alternatives to driving. Transit is also a catalyst for economic development. More than $10 billion in transit-oriented development has occurred within walking distance of MAX light rail stations since the decision to build in 1980. Developers like the permanence of rail when investing in projects. Transit is also valued by the community. Most of our riders— 81 percent—are choice riders. They have a car available or choose not to own one so they can ride TriMet. With more than 325,000 trips taken each weekday on our buses, MAX Light Rail and WES Commuter Rail, we eliminate 66 million annual car trips. That eases traffic congestion and helps keep our air clean. TriMet carries more people than any other U.S. transit system our size. Our many innovations have drawn the attention of government leaders, planners, transit providers and transit users from around the world. We didn’t start out that way.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    McCaleb, Iris From: Birdshill CPO/NA <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 2:15 PM To: McCaleb, Iris; Simpson, Anne-Marie; Council Distribution Cc: Rooney, Erica; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; OTC Admin; [email protected]; Runnion, Kelly; Birdshill CPO/NA; Lazenby, Scott; Randy Arthur; Bill Ward; [email protected]; LaMotte, John; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Wilson, Katie; Schmidt, Gary; [email protected]; CPO Summit; Siegel, Scot; [email protected]; millerthomas00 @comcast.net; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Donald Nash; Tom O'Connor (Uplands NA); Babs Hamachek (Lakewood NA); Carole Ockert; Jones, Carolyne; Cheryl Uchida; Chris Jacobson (Lake Forest NA); [email protected]; Craig Stephens; David Beckett; Dave Sengenberger; david roche; Diana Boom (Evergreen NA); Dwight Sangrey (Mt. Park); Ewa Campbell (Palisades NA); Fergus Nolan (Holly Orchard NA); Jan Castle; Jerry Nierengarten (Lake Grove NA); Jon Bell; [email protected]; [email protected]; Gary Stein; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Transportation Plan for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities I Table of Contents June 2020
    Table of Contents June 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 Development of the CTP .......................................................................................................... 1-3 Principles of the CTP ................................................................................................................ 1-5 Overview of relevant grant programs ..................................................................................... 1-7 TriMet Role as the Special Transportation Fund Agency ........................................................ 1-8 Other State Funding ................................................................................................................. 1-9 Coordination with Metro and Joint Policy Advisory Committee (JPACT) .............................. 1-11 2. Existing Transportation Services ...................................................................... 2-1 Regional Transit Service Providers .......................................................................................... 2-6 Community-Based Transit Providers ..................................................................................... 2-18 Statewide Transit Providers ................................................................................................... 2-26 3. Service Guidelines ........................................................................................... 3-1 History .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of Trimet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY
    MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of TriMet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY 50 YEARS OF TRIMET AND TRANSIT IN THE PORTLAND REGION CONTENTS Foreword: 50 Years of Transit Creating Livable Communities . 1 Setting the Stage for Doing Things Differently . 2 Portland, Oregon’s Legacy of Transit . 4 Beginnings ............................................................................4 Twentieth Century .....................................................................6 Transit’s Decline. 8 Bucking National Trends in the Dynamic 1970s . 11 New Institutions for a New Vision .......................................................12 TriMet Is Born .........................................................................14 Shifting Gears .........................................................................17 The Freeway Revolt ....................................................................18 Sidebar: The TriMet and City of Portland Partnership .......................................19 TriMet Turbulence .....................................................................22 Setting a Course . 24 Capital Program ......................................................................25 Sidebar: TriMet Early Years and the Mount Hood Freeway ...................................29 The Banfield Project ...................................................................30 Sidebar: The Transportation Managers Advisory Committee ................................34 Sidebar: Return to Sender ..............................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Oswego Portland
    Lake Oswego to Portland TRANSIT PROJECT Public scoping report August 2008 Metro People places. Open spaces. Clean air and clean water do not stop at city limits or county lines. Neither does the need for jobs, a thriving economy and good transportation choices for people and businesses in our region. Voters have asked Metro to help with the challenges that cross those lines and affect the 25 cities and three coun- ties in the Portland metropolitan area. A regional approach simply makes sense when it comes to protecting open space, caring for parks, planning for the best use of land, managing garbage disposal and increasing recycling. Metro oversees world-class facilities such as the Oregon Zoo, which contributes to conservation and educa- tion, and the Oregon Convention Center, which benefits the region’s economy Metro representatives Metro Council President – David Bragdon Metro Councilors – Rod Park, District 1; Carlotta Collette, District 2; Carl Hosticka, District 3; Kathryn Harrington, District 4; Rex Burkholder, District 5; Robert Liberty, District 6. Auditor – Suzanne Flynn www.oregonmetro.gov Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project Public scoping report Table of contents SECTION 1: SCOPING REPORT INTRODUCTION …………………………………......... 1 Introduction Summary of outreach activities Summary of agency scoping comments Public comment period findings Conclusion SECTION 2: PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING ………………………………………………… 7 Summary Handouts SECTION 3: AGENCY SCOPING COMMENTS ………………………………………..... 31 Environmental Protection Agency SECTION 4: PUBLIC
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Funding Task Force: Trimet Update
    Transportation Funding Task Force: TriMet Update September 25th, 2019 Meeting Outline Welcome and Introduction Dr. Linda Simmons, TriMet Board Member and T2020 Task Force Member 1. Transit Equity and Inclusion, Low Income Fare Initiatives John Gardner - Director, Transit Equity, Inclusion and Community Affairs 2. Transit Service Update and Future Service Outlook Kerry Ayres-Palanuk – Director, Planning & Policy 3. Enhanced Transit and Better Bus Program Jamie Snook – Manager, Capital Planning 4. Regionally Significant Transit Priorities Dave Unsworth – Director, Project Development & Permitting Discussion with Task Force Members Bernie Bottomly - Executive Director, Public Affairs 2 1. Transit Equity and Inclusion, Low Income Fare Initiatives John Gardner Director of Transit Equity, Inclusion and Community Affairs TriMet’s Diversity at a glance TriMet’s Board • Majority women and men of color TriMet’s Executive Leadership • Majority women and men of color TriMet’s Staff reflects the Diversity of the Region TriMet’s Ridership • 37% of all trips on TriMet are taken by people of color • 40% of the trips taken by people of color are taken on MAX 4 Community Engagement • TEAC TriMet’s Transit Equity Advisory Committee is made up of the following organizations • Safety & Security • Youth Committee • Language Access Advisory Committee • Committee on Accessible Transportation • Riders Club ~59,500 • Launching newsletter for 170 community based organizations and system partners 5 Fare affordability & system access • Access Transit provides $1.3
    [Show full text]
  • Division Transit Project
    DIVISION TRANSIT PROJECT Better bus service coming to SE Division The Division Transit Project will be a first for our community—high-capacity bus service providing faster, more reliable trips. As population and businesses along SE Division Street rapidly grow, impacts on traffic, including public transit, also increase. The Line 4-Division is one of TriMet’s most popular bus lines, with more than 10,000 daily rides between Downtown Portland and Gresham. With this high ridership come challenges, however, such as crowded buses, full buses passing riders waiting at stops, and traffic congestion behind buses making frequent stops to pick up riders. The Division Transit Project will improve service along Division and help keep traffic moving while supporting increasing ridership in the future. Faster, easier, more reliable The 15-mile Division Transit Project will improve bus service between Downtown Portland, Southeast and East Portland and Gresham by providing • longer, three-door buses with room for 60% more riders • bus stops that may include amenities such as weather protection • multiple-door boarding for quicker stops • transit signal priority—traffic signals prioritize bus travel, getting riders to their destinations faster • stations placed where there is greatest rider demand, to maximize travel times while making important transit connections Together, these improvements will reduce travel times up to 20 percent, with buses running every 15 minutes and even more often during rush hour. Additionally, the project will build stations appropriate to their setting along Division Street. Some stations east of 82nd Avenue will be large and comfortable with improved weather protection, lighting and passenger amenities.
    [Show full text]