DOCSLIB.ORG

Extending Light Rail to the North

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PHILADELPHIA THOMPSON SR-501 SUNSET -SYL V ERWIN O REIGER MEMORIAL AN SCHOLLS FERR SR-501 Y SUNSET PA TT SKYLINE ON WILLAMETTE SHA TTUCK T S HELENS YEON LOWER RIVER LOWER HUMPHREY POR TLAND 41ST W DOSCH SE ARD 36TH COLUMBIA LAKESHORE NICOLAI 31ST V BLISS AUGHN 93RD 1 19TH The Columbia River Crossing project(CRC) is expanding transit options between Portland and Vancouver. This bi-state project will extend an existing 52-mile light rail system across the Columbia River to connect the region’s largest and most concentrated employment area in downtown Portland with Vancouver. This extension will improve connections, reliability 23RD and travel times for riders. VIST A LOMBARD GREELEY HAYDEN ISLAND The Columbia River Crossing Project (CRC) is expanding transit options in Vancouver and will improve connections, reliability and travel times for riders. LAKESHORE 21ST 21ST W BROAD N MARINE DR MARINE N FRONT SIMPSON 94TH A N JANTZEN N Vancouver Y GOING 16TH N H BERNIE GREELEY A 18TH Y D A 109TH E VE LOVEJOY N I S L I405 A N 6TH D 11TH 11TH D LINCOLN R R FOU KAUFFMAN 9TH L 3RD 4TH LINCOLN B PLAIN TH 13TH ST 13TH 15TH ST 8TH ST 8TH T NAI Portland 149TH BARBUR 45TH O 139TH MCLOUGHLIN BL UNION ALDER VD L KEL HARBOR OREGON N T O N MARINE DR MARINE N M Y A H A COLUMBI N W A WASHINGTON ST HOOD W K MAIN ST I5 I S T ASHING VD L 39TH A N POR DELL Highway Improvements D BROADW Existing Highway and Bridge AY ST Proposed Light Rail Alignment ST 17TH Existing MAX Yellow Line HAZEL Proposed Park and Ride Proposed Light Rail Stations D L MARQUAM B R TLAND VD ROSS ISLAND 63RD R MA TIN LUTHER KING JR KING LUTHER TIN 1 17TH ON 10TH BELMONT MARTIN LUTHER KING 13TH UNION Clark I-5 College Extending Light Rail The To North MCLOUGHLIN GRAND 15TH BROADW ROSS WEIDLER 33RD LLOYD E RESER MCLOUGHLIN BL 11TH 68TH A 12TH Y VE ST 20TH SE COLUMBIA N E 1 3 T H A V E L MI MORRISON W AUKIE COLUMBIA VD 159TH W ST 17TH 49TH 25TH L MIL PRESCOTT JOHNS BL A Y L B PLAIN HOUSE BL 20TH 20TH VD 54TH 20TH 21ST 99TH 29TH VD VD 78TH 20TH E 5TH ST 5TH E 78TH Connecting Communities ThePortland–Vancouver region is expected to grow significantly in the next 20 years, with a million more people projected to live here by 2030. Light rail will improve mobility for many people and provide a viable alternative to automobile travel, helping to relieve congested conditions across the Columbia River. The completed light rail extension will provide reliable transit service between many key regional destinations including: Columbia River Crossing CRC is a long-term, comprehensive solution to address safety and congestion problems on I-5 between Portland, Oregon and Vancouver, Washington. The project will replace the I-5 bridge, extend light rail to Vancouver, improve closely-spaced interchanges and enhance DIVISION pedestrian and bicycle pathways. In addition, the project will provide transit connections to the region’s other light rail lines, streetcar lines, Amtrak passenger Benefits to local residents, the natural environment and rail service and C-TRAN and TriMet bus routes. T the regional economy include: S JAMES • 33RD • • • • • • • • • L B EVERGREEN Vancouver and Portland central business districts, employment centers, and convention centers 44TH Improved safety Entertainment and retail districts such as Esther Short Park, Pioneer Courthouse Square and the Oregon Zoo A more reliable trip for freight, autos, and transit Reduced congestion on I-5 and adjacent neighborhoods Colleges and universities, including Clark College and No bridge lifts Portland State University Earthquake protection Supported and sustained jobs with improved access to Reduced emissions and improved water quality ports and highways VD BRANDT HA WTHORNE F ALK ST ARK BLANDFORD MINNEHAHA 18TH 50TH 39TH 50TH 42ND ST 54TH 47TH JOHNS 56TH 88TH DEVINE 40TH R PO PRESCOTT FOUR TLAND 139TH 50TH TH PLAIN 64TH FOSTER 58TH 52ND KILLINGSWOR R MACA 66TH FREMONT 78TH 57TH THUR TH ANDRESEN 60TH 60TH CULL 72ND Y 72ND 62ND 41ST 1 19TH V 77TH ANCOUVER MALL 63RD POWELL 159TH 88TH RT BU THORBURN ON T LIESER THURS 76TH ON T S 83RD HELENS 92ND GLISAN R 82ND AIRPO 82ND 94TH T SANDY 97TH 102ND 92ND T COVING EVERGREEN MARINE 104TH I205 FWY-POWELL BLVD I205 ON 10TH 107TH I84 I-205 156TH 108TH 2ND 109TH ELLSWORTH GHER 112TH 102ND I84 FWY 103RD CHKALOV 154TH SR 503 -I205 FWY SR-503 SR-503 WEIDLER CAPLES SANDY 121ST 122ND 49TH I205 9TH 112TH 7TH SR-500 5TH 99TH 130TH 18TH 131ST SR-14 159TH 122ND T L A T ON 136TH POWELL 138TH 28TH 137TH 137TH BURNSIDE 138TH 142ND 142ND 39TH BELLA VISTA ST HWOOD ARK HEART 136TH P CASCADE 48TH BRIAR WOOD 152ND ARK PARKCREST 155TH W 78TH ARD A MCGILLIVR 1ST 148TH POPLAR HALSEY 160TH Y 162ND 34TH 164TH Light Rail Designs The CRC project team is working closely with the community to create a light rail system that fits well into the adjacent neighborhoods. The transit portion of the CRC project will include a 2.9- mile extension of TriMet’s Yellow Line from the existing Expo Center Station in north Portland, Ore., through downtown Vancouver, Wash., to a terminus near the Marshall/Leupke Center. Hayden Island A station is planned as part of the light rail extension. The Distinctive surfaces help define transit, auto and pedestrian areas. station will be located on the west side of I-5 a short distance from the Jantzen Beach SuperCenter. The station is being CRC is using design strategies proven to reduce the potential designed to support the goals of the Hayden Island Plan, which for crime at stations and on trains. Significant input from is a City of Portland neighborhood plan developed with local advisory groups, local jurisdictions and the public will help in input to reflect the long-term vision of the community. the design of a safe system. Recommendations include: Vancouver • Integrate stations into the community, near residential In downtown Vancouver, trains will travel north on Broadway and commercial buildings. Street and south on Washington Street in a dedicated lane. • Manage pedestrian access to stations through the Trains will travel east and west on 17th Street to the terminus thoughtful placement of entrances and exits, fencing, station near the Marshall/Luepke Center. Four transit stations lighting and landscaping. will be built along the line. In addition, three park and ride facilities are planned to accommodate about 2,900 parking • Design stations so that user activity is easily visible, with spaces. Park and rides will be built near Fifth and Washington clear lines of sight into and out of the station. streets, 15th and Washington streets, and across from the Marshall/Luepke Center. • Ensure stations are well-maintained and visually pleasing using high-quality materials, attractive design features and public art. • Create a well-defined separation of stations and crosswalks from automobile traffic, using distinct pavement textures and traffic signals. • Use visual and audible warning devices to alert pedestrians, bicyclists and drivers to approaching trains. Station lighting increases visibility for those on or approaching platforms. Designing a Safe System Planning for safety and security on and around light rail is a top priority for C-TRAN, TriMet and the CRC project. The new light rail line is being designed to promote safe interaction between light rail trains, cars, pedestrians and bicyclists. A cooperative agency effort and the application of safety and security principles will ensure that light rail is designed and Transit police and fare inspectors help increase passenger safety. constructed to run safely, securely, dependably and efficiently. www.ColumbiaRiverCrossing.org PROJECT PARTNERS Providing Passenger Security workshops were held in the communities to gather input on the light rail extension. Community input has resulted in the following work to date: CRC is working closely with the City of Vancouver and City of Portland police, and C-TRAN and TriMet security to maximize passenger safety at stations and park and ride • Design guidelines for the Hayden Island station, facilities, as well as on light rail trains. CRC’s security plan Vancouver stations and park and rides. will include: • Route for the Vancouver portion of the line • Monitoring stations and trains by transit security and local police officers • Station locations in Vancouver • Enforcement of fare payment • Guidance on traffic and parking along the Vancouver route • Installation of closed-circuit TV (CCTV) at light rail The community will continue to be consulted as light rail stations, park and rides and on trains designs are refined to gain input on appearance of the stations and streets, park and ride designs and security plans. • Partnerships with local law enforcement and the regional 9-1-1 system to have the closest available units available as “first responders” to any incident Did You Know? • Programs to remove graffiti, pick-up litter and maintain landscaping uAt opening, weekday peak service will provide • Working with local government on appropriate land uses trains every 7.5 minutes, with 15-minute service near transit stations during off-peak periods. Community Feedback Shapes Design uBy 2030, there will be about 18,700 trips crossing the Columbia River on light rail each day, with Community advisory groups have worked with CRC about 6 million boardings annually. project staff to ensure community preferencesCouplet and the Option #3 needs of transit riders are considered in light rail system uTravelers between Vancouver and downtown planning. Transit advisorySide- group membersRunning included business T rack and Station and neighborhood leaders, transit riders and agency Portland also will have the option of using a representatives.
Recommended publications
  • Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2019 Progress Report

    Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2019 Progress Report

    Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2019 Progress Report December 2019 Progress Report i This page intentionally left blank. ii Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2, 2019 (Electronic Transmittal Only) The Honorable Governor Inslee The Honorable Kate Brown WA Senate Transportation Committee Oregon Transportation Commission WA House Transportation Committee OR Joint Committee on Transportation Dear Governors, Transportation Commission, and Transportation Committees: On behalf of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), we are pleased to submit the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program status report, as directed by Washington’s 2019-21 transportation budget ESHB 1160, section 306 (24)(e)(iii). The intent of this report is to share activities that have lead up to the beginning of the biennium, accomplishments of the program since funding was made available, and future steps to be completed by the program as it moves forward with the clear support of both states. With the appropriation of $35 million in ESHB 1160 to open a project office and restart work to replace the Interstate Bridge, Governor Inslee and the Washington State Legislature acknowledged the need to renew efforts for replacement of this aging infrastructure. Governor Kate Brown and the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) directed ODOT to coordinate with WSDOT on the establishment of a project office. The OTC also allocated $9 million as the state’s initial contribution, and Oregon Legislative leadership appointed members to a Joint Committee on the Interstate Bridge. These actions demonstrate Oregon’s agreement that replacement of the Interstate 5 Bridge is vital. As is conveyed in this report, the program office is working to set this project up for success by working with key partners to build the foundation as we move forward toward project development.
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study

    Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study

    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
  • NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon

    NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon

    Portland State University PDXScholar Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Publications and Presentations Planning 6-24-2014 Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Jenny H. Liu Portland State University, [email protected] Zakari Mumuni Portland State University Matt Berggren Portland State University Matt Miller University of Utah Arthur C. Nelson University of Utah SeeFollow next this page and for additional additional works authors at: https:/ /pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac Part of the Transportation Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Liu, Jenny H.; Mumuni, Zakari; Berggren, Matt; Miller, Matt; Nelson, Arthur C.; and Ewing, Reid, "Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon" (2014). Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations. 124. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson, and Reid Ewing This report is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Do TODs Make a Difference? Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson & Reid Ewing Portland State University 6/24/2014 ______________________________________________________________________________ DO TODs MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 of 35 Section 1-INTRODUCTION 2 of 35 ______________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1-INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................
  • Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Report

    Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Report

    Report to the Washington State Legislature Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory December 2017 Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Errata The Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory published to WSDOT’s website on December 1, 2017 contained the following errata. The items below have been corrected in versions downloaded or printed after January 10, 2018. Section 4, page 62: Corrects the parties to the tolling agreement between the States—the Washington State Transportation Commission and the Oregon Transportation Commission. Miscellaneous sections and pages: Minor grammatical corrections. Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory | December 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary. .1 Section 1: Introduction. .29 Legislative Background to this Report Purpose and Structure of this Report Significant Characteristics of the Project Area Prior Work Summary Section 2: Long-Range Planning . .35 Introduction Bi-State Transportation Committee Portland/Vancouver I-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership Task Force The Transition from Long-Range Planning to Project Development Section 3: Context and Constraints . 41 Introduction Guiding Principles: Vision and Values Statement & Statement of Purpose and Need Built and Natural Environment Navigation and Aviation Protected Species and Resources Traffic Conditions and Travel Demand Safety of Bridge and Highway Facilities Freight Mobility Mobility for Transit, Pedestrian and Bicycle Travel Section 4: Funding and Finance. 55 Introduction Funding and Finance Plan Evolution During
  • Frog Ferry Presentation

    Frog Ferry Presentation

    Frog Ferry Portland-Vancouver Passenger Water Taxi Service Frog= Shwah-kuk in the Chinookan Tribal Language, Art: Adam McIssac CONFIDENTIAL-Susan Bladholm Version 2018 Q1 Canoes and Frog Mythology on the Columbia & Willamette Rivers The ability to travel the waters of the Columbia and Willamette rivers has allowed people to become intertwined through trade and commerce for centuries by canoe. The journal entries of Lewis and Clark in 1805 described the shores of the Columbia River as being lined with canoes elaborately carved from cedar trees. The ability to navigate these waterways gave the Chinook people control over vast reaches of the Columbia River basin for hundreds of years. The area surrounding the Columbia and Willamette rivers is steeped in a rich mythology told to us through early ethnographers who traveled the river documenting Native American inhabitants and their culture. According to Chinookan mythology, Frog (Shwekheyk in Chinook language), was given the basics of weavable fiber by his relatives, Snake and omnipotent Coyote. With this fiber, Frog was given the task of creating the cordage for the weaving of the first fishing net. With this net, made from fibers of nettle plants, Frog had made it possible for the new human beings to catch their first salmon. Coyote tested the net, with the guidance and wisdom of his three sisters, thereby establishing the complex set of taboos associated with the catching of the first salmon of the season. The Chinook people would never eat or harm Frog for his association to them would always protect him. That is why you should always step around frogs and never over them.
  • MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of Trimet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY

    MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of Trimet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY

    MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of TriMet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY 50 YEARS OF TRIMET AND TRANSIT IN THE PORTLAND REGION CONTENTS Foreword: 50 Years of Transit Creating Livable Communities . 1 Setting the Stage for Doing Things Differently . 2 Portland, Oregon’s Legacy of Transit . 4 Beginnings ............................................................................4 Twentieth Century .....................................................................6 Transit’s Decline. 8 Bucking National Trends in the Dynamic 1970s . 11 New Institutions for a New Vision .......................................................12 TriMet Is Born .........................................................................14 Shifting Gears .........................................................................17 The Freeway Revolt ....................................................................18 Sidebar: The TriMet and City of Portland Partnership .......................................19 TriMet Turbulence .....................................................................22 Setting a Course . 24 Capital Program ......................................................................25 Sidebar: TriMet Early Years and the Mount Hood Freeway ...................................29 The Banfield Project ...................................................................30 Sidebar: The Transportation Managers Advisory Committee ................................34 Sidebar: Return to Sender ..............................................................36
  • Transit Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Transit Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement

    I N T E R S TAT E 5 C O L U M B I A R I V E R C ROSSING Transit Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement December 2010 Title VI The Columbia River Crossing project team ensures full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by prohibiting discrimination against any person on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the provision of benefits and services resulting from its federally assisted programs and activities. For questions regarding WSDOT’s Title VI Program, you may contact the Department’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7098. For questions regarding ODOT’s Title VI Program, you may contact the Department’s Civil Rights Office at (503) 986- 4350. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information If you would like copies of this document in an alternative format, please call the Columbia River Crossing (CRC) project office at (360) 737-2726 or (503) 256-2726. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may contact the CRC project through the Telecommunications Relay Service by dialing 7-1-1. ¿Habla usted español? La informacion en esta publicación se puede traducir para usted. Para solicitar los servicios de traducción favor de llamar al (503) 731-4128. Cover Sheet Transit Technical Report Columbia River Crossing Submitted By: Elizabeth Mros-O’Hara, AICP Kelly Betteridge Theodore Stonecliffe, P.E. This page left blank intentionally. Interstate 5 Columbia River Crossing i Transit Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................................................
  • White Salmon Interstate Bridge Replacement Supplemental Draft EIS I

    White Salmon Interstate Bridge Replacement Supplemental Draft EIS I

    ODOT Key No.: 21280 This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. Notice of Document Availability This Supplemental Draft EIS is available for review at the following locations: Port of Hood River (by appointment) 1000 E. Port Marina Drive Hood River, OR 97031 Note: Washington residents can contact the Port to schedule an appointment to view the document in Klickitat County White Salmon Valley Community Library (limited services during the COVID-19 pandemic) 77 NE Wauna Avenue White Salmon, WA 98672 Stevenson Community Library (limited services during the COVID-19 pandemic) 120 NW Vancouver Avenue Stevenson, WA 98648 These documents are also available on the Project website: https://portofhoodriver.com/bridge/bridge-replacement- project/. At the time of publication, Port of Hood River offices are closed due to COVID-19. If you would like to review a hard copy of the Supplemental Draft EIS, please contact the Port at [email protected] or 541-386-1645 to make arrangements for review of the hard copy. The Supplemental Draft EIS can also be viewed at the White Salmon Valley Community Library and the Stevenson Community Library which are open with limited services during the COVID-19 pandemic. How to Submit Comments Written comments on the Supplemental Draft EIS can be submitted during the public comment period (November 20, 2020, through January 4, 2021) by email to [email protected] or regular mail to: Hood River Bridge Supplemental Draft EIS Kevin Greenwood Port of Hood River 1000 E. Port Marina Drive Hood River, OR 97031 Comments can be submitted orally and in writing at the public hearing for the Supplemental Draft EIS on December 3, 2020.
  • FY 2010-11 Unified Planning Work Program

    FY 2010-11 Unified Planning Work Program

    FY 2010-11 Unified Planning Work Program Transportation Planning in the Portland/Vancouver Metropolitan Area Metro Tualatin Hills Parks & Recreation City of Damascus City of Milwaukie City of Portland City of Wilsonville (SMART) Clackamas County Multnomah County Washington County TriMet Oregon Department of Transportation Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council Adopted April 15, 2010 FY 2010-11 Unified Planning Work Program Transportation Planning in the Portland/Vancouver Metropolitan Area Metro Tualatin Hills Parks & Recreation City of Damascus City of Milwaukie City of Portland City of Wilsonville (SMART) Clackamas County Multnomah County Washington County TriMet Oregon Department of Transportation Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council This Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) has been financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, and the Oregon Department of Transportation. The views expressed in this UPWP do not necessarily represent the views of these agencies. Table of Contents Page Overview i Metropolitan Portland Map iv Self-Certification Resolution v Metro Projects I. Transportation Planning Regional Transportation Planning* .............................................................................. 1 Best Design Practices in Transportation ...................................................................... 7 Making the Greatest Place Transportation Support* .................................................. 10 Transportation System Management
  • Transportation Funding Task Force: Trimet Update

    Transportation Funding Task Force: Trimet Update

    Transportation Funding Task Force: TriMet Update September 25th, 2019 Meeting Outline Welcome and Introduction Dr. Linda Simmons, TriMet Board Member and T2020 Task Force Member 1. Transit Equity and Inclusion, Low Income Fare Initiatives John Gardner - Director, Transit Equity, Inclusion and Community Affairs 2. Transit Service Update and Future Service Outlook Kerry Ayres-Palanuk – Director, Planning & Policy 3. Enhanced Transit and Better Bus Program Jamie Snook – Manager, Capital Planning 4. Regionally Significant Transit Priorities Dave Unsworth – Director, Project Development & Permitting Discussion with Task Force Members Bernie Bottomly - Executive Director, Public Affairs 2 1. Transit Equity and Inclusion, Low Income Fare Initiatives John Gardner Director of Transit Equity, Inclusion and Community Affairs TriMet’s Diversity at a glance TriMet’s Board • Majority women and men of color TriMet’s Executive Leadership • Majority women and men of color TriMet’s Staff reflects the Diversity of the Region TriMet’s Ridership • 37% of all trips on TriMet are taken by people of color • 40% of the trips taken by people of color are taken on MAX 4 Community Engagement • TEAC TriMet’s Transit Equity Advisory Committee is made up of the following organizations • Safety & Security • Youth Committee • Language Access Advisory Committee • Committee on Accessible Transportation • Riders Club ~59,500 • Launching newsletter for 170 community based organizations and system partners 5 Fare affordability & system access • Access Transit provides $1.3
  • Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance APRIL 25, 2018 April 25, 2018

    Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance APRIL 25, 2018 April 25, 2018

    CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance APRIL 25, 2018 April 25, 2018 ATTN: Dale Robins Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council (RTC) 1300 Franklin Street, 4th Floor Vancouver, Washington 98660 Re: Response to RFP Consultant Services for Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance Dear Mr. Dale Robins and Selection Committee, For nearly 95 years, travelers have crossed the Columbia River using the Hood River Bridge, which connects Hood River, Oregon and the communities of White Salmon and Bingen in Washington state. While the travelers are diverse - farmer, hiker, trucker, tugboat operator, windsurfer - their need is the same: a safe, reliable connection between Oregon and Washington. Today, the Hood River Bridge is failing to meet modern transportation demands: deteriorating bridge members, combined with dimensional and weight restrictions for trucks, hamper the structure’s effectiveness and, quite possibly, the regional economy. The replacement of the bridge is a critical transportation improvement needed to support the interstate travel of motorized vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists, and marine freight transport, which have significant local and regional economic and quality of life benefits. In 1999, a campaign to replace the existing bridge began, which then culminated into the 2003 Draft EIS, which was completed by Parsons Brinkerhoff now WSP. Following the Draft EIS, the firm conducted a Bridge TS&L study. From
  • West Broadway Transit Study Economic Development Impacts of Transit Alternatives

    West Broadway Transit Study Economic Development Impacts of Transit Alternatives

    West Broadway Transit Study Economic Development Impacts of Transit Alternatives 11/11/2015 Prepared by the SRF Consulting Group Team for Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3 II. Baseline Development Scenario ............................................................................................................... 3 III. Literature Review & Case Study Findings ............................................................................................... 9 IV. Developer Interview Findings ................................................................................................................ 17 V. BRT and Streetcar Development Scenarios........................................................................................... 19 Appendix: Transit Economic Development Impacts Case Studies ............................................................. 24 West Broadway Transit Study 2 I. Introduction Metro Transit, in collaboration with Hennepin County and the Cities of Minneapolis, Robbinsdale, and Golden Valley, is seeking guidance on the economic development impacts of proposed streetcar and bus rapid transit (BRT) alternatives along the West Broadway corridor. As documented in the April 1, 2015 methodology statement, transit can support economic development by enhancing mobility and providing a placemaking amenity for the corridor. The Team developed a financial model in order to