DOCSLIB.ORG

FY 2010-11 Unified Planning Work Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY 2010-11 Unified Planning Work Program FY 2010-11 Unified Planning Work Program Transportation Planning in the Portland/Vancouver Metropolitan Area Metro Tualatin Hills Parks & Recreation City of Damascus City of Milwaukie City of Portland City of Wilsonville (SMART) Clackamas County Multnomah County Washington County TriMet Oregon Department of Transportation Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council Adopted April 15, 2010 FY 2010-11 Unified Planning Work Program Transportation Planning in the Portland/Vancouver Metropolitan Area Metro Tualatin Hills Parks & Recreation City of Damascus City of Milwaukie City of Portland City of Wilsonville (SMART) Clackamas County Multnomah County Washington County TriMet Oregon Department of Transportation Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council This Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) has been financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, and the Oregon Department of Transportation. The views expressed in this UPWP do not necessarily represent the views of these agencies. Table of Contents Page Overview i Metropolitan Portland Map iv Self-Certification Resolution v Metro Projects I. Transportation Planning Regional Transportation Planning* .............................................................................. 1 Best Design Practices in Transportation ...................................................................... 7 Making the Greatest Place Transportation Support* .................................................. 10 Transportation System Management & Operations (TSMO) ...................................... 12 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program*.................................................. 19 Environmental Justice & Title VI ................................................................................ 22 Regional Transportation Plan Financing* ................................................................... 25 Regional Freight Program .......................................................................................... 27 II. Research & Modeling Model Development Program* ................................................................................... 30 System Monitoring* ................................................................................................... 33 Technical Assistance ................................................................................................. 36 Economic, Demographic & Land Use Forecasting* ................................................... 38 GIS Mapping & Land Information ............................................................................... 42 III. Administrative Services Management & Coordination/Grants Management* ................................................... 44 IV. Corridor Planning & Development Streetcar Technical Methods ..................................................................................... 47 Bi-State Coordination ................................................................................................. 50 Project Development ................................................................................................. 52 Southwest Corridor Refinement Plan ......................................................................... 55 East Metro Corridor Refinement Plan ........................................................................ 58 * Project will be affected by a significant shortfall in federal planning grants in FY 2010-11 and will be updated accordingly in scope/budget. Other Projects of Regional Significance Tualatin Hills Parks & Recreation Fanno Creek Trail: Hall Boulevard Crossing .............................................................. 63 City of Damascus Damascus Area Land Use & Transportation Planning ............................................... 65 City of Milwaukie OR-99E Bridge at Kellogg Lake ................................................................................. 68 City of Portland SW Capitol Highway, Multnomah – Taylors Ferry ...................................................... 70 Sullivan’s Gulch Trail Concept Plan ........................................................................... 72 City of Wilsonville South Metro Area Regional Transit (SMART) ............................................................ 74 Clackamas County SE 172nd Avenue: Foster Rd – Sunnyside Rd .......................................................... 77 Sunrise Project FEIS ................................................................................................. 79 Multnomah County Sellwood Bridge Project FEIS .................................................................................... 81 Washington County I-5 / 99W Connector Study.........................................................................................83 OR 10: Oleson Road/Scholls Ferry Road Intersection ............................................... 85 Metro Tonquin Trail Master Plan .......................................................................................... 88 Lake Oswego to Milwaukie Trail Master Plan ............................................................ 91 Mt. Scott-Scouter Mt. Loop Trail Master Plan............................................................. 93 Westside Trail Master Plan: Tualatin River to Willamette River .................................. 95 TriMet Lake Oswego Transit Corridor FEIS/PE..................................................................... 97 Washington County Commuter Rail Before/After ..................................................... 100 Portland – Milwaukie Light Rail Feis ........................................................................ 104 South Corridor I-205/Portland Mall Light Rail Before/After ....................................... 106 Employer Outreach Program ................................................................................... 110 Pedestrian Network Analysis ................................................................................... 115 Bus Stop Development Program ............................................................................. 117 ODOT I-5 Columbia River Crossing .................................................................................... 120 ODOT Planning Program ......................................................................................... 124 2010-2011 Unified Planning Work Program Funding Summary Projects of Regional Significance Funding Summary FY 2010-11 PORTLAND AND METROPOLITAN AREA UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION Metro is the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) designated for the Oregon portion of the Portland/Vancouver urbanized area, covering 25 cities and three counties (see map following this overview). It is Metro’s responsibility to meet the requirements of Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) Transportation Planning Rule (TPR-Rule 12), and the Metro Charter for this MPO area. In combination, these requirements call for development of a multi-modal transportation system plan that is integrated with the region's land use plans, and meets Federal and state planning requirements. This Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) includes the transportation planning activities of Metro and other area governments involved in regional transportation planning activities for the fiscal year of July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011. DECISION-MAKING PROCESS Metro is governed by an elected regional Council, in accordance with a voter-approved charter. The Metro Council is comprised of representatives from six districts and a Council President elected region-wide. The Chief Operating Officer is appointed by the Metro Council and leads the day-to-day operations of Metro. Metro uses a decision-making structure that provides state, regional and local governments the opportunity to participate in the transportation and land use decisions of the organization. Two key committees are the Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation (JPACT) and the Metro Policy Advisory Committee (MPAC). These committees are comprised of elected and appointed officials and receive technical advice from the Transportation Policy Alternatives Committee (TPAC) and the Metro Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC). JOINT POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION JPACT is chaired by a Metro Councilor and includes two additional Metro Councilors, seven locally elected officials representing cities and counties, and appointed officials from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), TriMet, the Port of Portland, and the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The State of Washington is also represented with three seats that are traditionally filled by two locally elected officials and an appointed official from the Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT). All transportation-related actions (including Federal MPO actions) are recommended by JPACT to the Metro Council. The Metro Council can approve the recommendations or refer them back to JPACT with a specific concern for reconsideration. Final approval of each action requires the concurrence of both JPACT and the Metro Council. JPACT is primarily involved in periodic updates to the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP), and review of ongoing studies and financial issues affecting transportation planning in the region.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2019 Progress Report
    Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2019 Progress Report December 2019 Progress Report i This page intentionally left blank. ii Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2, 2019 (Electronic Transmittal Only) The Honorable Governor Inslee The Honorable Kate Brown WA Senate Transportation Committee Oregon Transportation Commission WA House Transportation Committee OR Joint Committee on Transportation Dear Governors, Transportation Commission, and Transportation Committees: On behalf of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), we are pleased to submit the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program status report, as directed by Washington’s 2019-21 transportation budget ESHB 1160, section 306 (24)(e)(iii). The intent of this report is to share activities that have lead up to the beginning of the biennium, accomplishments of the program since funding was made available, and future steps to be completed by the program as it moves forward with the clear support of both states. With the appropriation of $35 million in ESHB 1160 to open a project office and restart work to replace the Interstate Bridge, Governor Inslee and the Washington State Legislature acknowledged the need to renew efforts for replacement of this aging infrastructure. Governor Kate Brown and the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) directed ODOT to coordinate with WSDOT on the establishment of a project office. The OTC also allocated $9 million as the state’s initial contribution, and Oregon Legislative leadership appointed members to a Joint Committee on the Interstate Bridge. These actions demonstrate Oregon’s agreement that replacement of the Interstate 5 Bridge is vital. As is conveyed in this report, the program office is working to set this project up for success by working with key partners to build the foundation as we move forward toward project development.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Report
    Report to the Washington State Legislature Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory December 2017 Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Errata The Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory published to WSDOT’s website on December 1, 2017 contained the following errata. The items below have been corrected in versions downloaded or printed after January 10, 2018. Section 4, page 62: Corrects the parties to the tolling agreement between the States—the Washington State Transportation Commission and the Oregon Transportation Commission. Miscellaneous sections and pages: Minor grammatical corrections. Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory | December 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary. .1 Section 1: Introduction. .29 Legislative Background to this Report Purpose and Structure of this Report Significant Characteristics of the Project Area Prior Work Summary Section 2: Long-Range Planning . .35 Introduction Bi-State Transportation Committee Portland/Vancouver I-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership Task Force The Transition from Long-Range Planning to Project Development Section 3: Context and Constraints . 41 Introduction Guiding Principles: Vision and Values Statement & Statement of Purpose and Need Built and Natural Environment Navigation and Aviation Protected Species and Resources Traffic Conditions and Travel Demand Safety of Bridge and Highway Facilities Freight Mobility Mobility for Transit, Pedestrian and Bicycle Travel Section 4: Funding and Finance. 55 Introduction Funding and Finance Plan Evolution During
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Filing Term of Office Incumbent Salary Fee Office
    FEDERAL OFFICES (File with state) ANNUAL FILING TERM OF OFFICE INCUMBENT SALARY FEE OFFICE President Barack Obama - $0 4-year Term, Partisan U.S. Senator Patty Murray $174,000 $1740.00 6-year Term, Partisan CONGRESSIONAL OFFICES (File with state) ANNUAL FILING TERM OF OFFICE INCUMBENT SALARY FEE OFFICE Congressional Dist. 3 U.S. Representative Jaime Herrera Beutler $174,000 $1740.00 2-year Term, Partisan WASHINGTON STATE OFFICES (File with state) ANNUAL FILING TERM OF OFFICE INCUMBENT SALARY FEE OFFICE Governor Jay Inslee $171,898 $1718.98 4-year Term, Partisan Lt. Governor Brad Owen $100,880 $1008.80 4-year Term, Partisan Secretary of State Kim Wyman $120,459 $1204.59 4-year Term, Partisan State Treasurer Jim McIntire $133,750 $1337.50 4-year Term, Partisan State Auditor Troy Kelley $120,459 $1204.59 4-year Term, Partisan Attorney General Bob Ferguson $156,270 $1562.70 4-year Term, Partisan Commissioner of Public Lands Peter J. Goldmark $130,253 $1302.53 4-year Term, Partisan Superintendent of Public Instruction Randy I. Dorn $132,883 $1328.83 4-year Term, Partisan Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler $121,628 $1216.28 4-year Term, Partisan 14th LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT OFFICES (File with state) ANNUAL FILING TERM OF OFFICE INCUMBENT SALARY FEE OFFICE State Senator Curtis King $45,474 $454.74 4-year Term, Partisan State Rep., Position 1 Norm Johnson $45,474 $454.74 2-year Term, Partisan State Rep., Position 2 Gina R. McCabe $45,474 $454.74 2-year Term, Partisan 17th LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT OFFICES (File with Clark County Auditor) ANNUAL FILING
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Senate 2016
    WASHINGTON STATE SENATE 2016 Senator Jan Angel (R) District 26 INB 203A 360‐786‐7650 [email protected] Financial Institutions & Insurance, Vice Chair; Health Care; Trade & Economic Development Legislative Asst: Debbie Austin Senator Barbara Bailey (R) District 10 INB 109B 360‐786‐7618 [email protected] Higher Education, Chair; Health Care; Rules; Ways & Means Legislative Asst: Vicki Angelini Senator Michael Baumgartner (R) District 6 LEG 404 360‐786‐7610 [email protected] Commerce and Labor, Chair; Higher Education, Vice Chair; Health Care; Transportation Legislative Asst: Kaleb Hoffer Senator Randi Becker (R) District 2 INB 110 360‐786‐7602 [email protected] Health Care, Chair; Higher Education; Ways & Means Legislative Asst: Tiffani Sanné WASHINGTON STATE SENATE 2016 Senator Don Benton (R) District 17 LEG 409 360‐786‐7632 [email protected] Financial Institutions & Insurance, Chair; Government Operations and State Security , Vice Chair; Transportation, Vice Chair; Rules Legislative Asst: Alexander Bohler Senator Andy Billig (D) District 3 LEG 412 360‐786‐7604 [email protected] Early Learning & K‐12 Education; Rules; Ways & Means Legislative Asst: Kate Burke Senator John Braun (R) District 20 LEG 407 360‐786‐7638 [email protected] Commerce and Labor, Vice Chair; Trade & Economic Development, Vice Chair; Ways & Means, Vice Chair; Energy, Environment & Telecommunications Legislative Asst: Ruth Peterson Senator Sharon Brown (R) District 8 INB 202 360‐786‐7614 [email protected] Trade & Economic
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State 2015 Gas Tax Increase
    Washington Senate Bill (2015) Title of Bill: Senate Bill 5987 Purpose: A $16 billion, 16-year transportation plan, which included an 11.9 cents-per-gallon gas tax increase—gradually implemented beginning Aug. 1, 2015, and fully applied on July 1, 2016—and an increase in transportation-related fees, including those for overweight vehicles. The bill also permits Sound Transit residents to vote on a plan to increase taxes for an additional $15 billion in order to expand the region’s light rail system. Status of Amendment: Passed Washington Senate Bill 5987 (2015) Signed into law: July 15, 2015 Senate House FOR 37 54 AGAINST 7 44 History State Gas Tax Before SB 5987, drivers in Washington state paid a flat excise tax on gasoline of 37.5 cents-per-gallon. That amount was last set in 2005, when the state legislature approved a 9.5 cents-per-gallon state gas tax increase (phased in over four years). The package, including an increase in vehicle weight fees, was estimated to raise $8.5 billion over a 16-year period. Previous gas tax increases were implemented in 2003, 1991, and 1990. Gas Tax Distribution & Transportation Funding Sources Washington state’s highway and ferry system is funded through a combination of motor vehicle fuel taxes (23%); vehicle licenses, permits, and fees (12%); federal funds (26%); bonding (23%), and other sources such as tolling, ferry fares, and local funding (16%).i The transportation budget pays for “maintaining, preserving, and improving the highway system; operating ferries; motor vehicle registration; and enforcing traffic laws on the state highway system.” ii The state’s gas tax of 37.5 cents-per-gallon was constitutionally dedicated for ‘highway purposes’ in the 18th Amendment (November 1944).
    [Show full text]
  • Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012
    VERIZON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY – DECEMBER 2012 1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 20 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon in 2012. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Senior Vice President, Public Policy 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? and the government agencies administering the federal and individual state election laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Frog Ferry Presentation
    Frog Ferry Portland-Vancouver Passenger Water Taxi Service Frog= Shwah-kuk in the Chinookan Tribal Language, Art: Adam McIssac CONFIDENTIAL-Susan Bladholm Version 2018 Q1 Canoes and Frog Mythology on the Columbia & Willamette Rivers The ability to travel the waters of the Columbia and Willamette rivers has allowed people to become intertwined through trade and commerce for centuries by canoe. The journal entries of Lewis and Clark in 1805 described the shores of the Columbia River as being lined with canoes elaborately carved from cedar trees. The ability to navigate these waterways gave the Chinook people control over vast reaches of the Columbia River basin for hundreds of years. The area surrounding the Columbia and Willamette rivers is steeped in a rich mythology told to us through early ethnographers who traveled the river documenting Native American inhabitants and their culture. According to Chinookan mythology, Frog (Shwekheyk in Chinook language), was given the basics of weavable fiber by his relatives, Snake and omnipotent Coyote. With this fiber, Frog was given the task of creating the cordage for the weaving of the first fishing net. With this net, made from fibers of nettle plants, Frog had made it possible for the new human beings to catch their first salmon. Coyote tested the net, with the guidance and wisdom of his three sisters, thereby establishing the complex set of taboos associated with the catching of the first salmon of the season. The Chinook people would never eat or harm Frog for his association to them would always protect him. That is why you should always step around frogs and never over them.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement
    I N T E R S TAT E 5 C O L U M B I A R I V E R C ROSSING Transit Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement December 2010 Title VI The Columbia River Crossing project team ensures full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by prohibiting discrimination against any person on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the provision of benefits and services resulting from its federally assisted programs and activities. For questions regarding WSDOT’s Title VI Program, you may contact the Department’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7098. For questions regarding ODOT’s Title VI Program, you may contact the Department’s Civil Rights Office at (503) 986- 4350. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information If you would like copies of this document in an alternative format, please call the Columbia River Crossing (CRC) project office at (360) 737-2726 or (503) 256-2726. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may contact the CRC project through the Telecommunications Relay Service by dialing 7-1-1. ¿Habla usted español? La informacion en esta publicación se puede traducir para usted. Para solicitar los servicios de traducción favor de llamar al (503) 731-4128. Cover Sheet Transit Technical Report Columbia River Crossing Submitted By: Elizabeth Mros-O’Hara, AICP Kelly Betteridge Theodore Stonecliffe, P.E. This page left blank intentionally. Interstate 5 Columbia River Crossing i Transit Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • White Salmon Interstate Bridge Replacement Supplemental Draft EIS I
    ODOT Key No.: 21280 This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. Notice of Document Availability This Supplemental Draft EIS is available for review at the following locations: Port of Hood River (by appointment) 1000 E. Port Marina Drive Hood River, OR 97031 Note: Washington residents can contact the Port to schedule an appointment to view the document in Klickitat County White Salmon Valley Community Library (limited services during the COVID-19 pandemic) 77 NE Wauna Avenue White Salmon, WA 98672 Stevenson Community Library (limited services during the COVID-19 pandemic) 120 NW Vancouver Avenue Stevenson, WA 98648 These documents are also available on the Project website: https://portofhoodriver.com/bridge/bridge-replacement- project/. At the time of publication, Port of Hood River offices are closed due to COVID-19. If you would like to review a hard copy of the Supplemental Draft EIS, please contact the Port at [email protected] or 541-386-1645 to make arrangements for review of the hard copy. The Supplemental Draft EIS can also be viewed at the White Salmon Valley Community Library and the Stevenson Community Library which are open with limited services during the COVID-19 pandemic. How to Submit Comments Written comments on the Supplemental Draft EIS can be submitted during the public comment period (November 20, 2020, through January 4, 2021) by email to [email protected] or regular mail to: Hood River Bridge Supplemental Draft EIS Kevin Greenwood Port of Hood River 1000 E. Port Marina Drive Hood River, OR 97031 Comments can be submitted orally and in writing at the public hearing for the Supplemental Draft EIS on December 3, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance APRIL 25, 2018 April 25, 2018
    CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance APRIL 25, 2018 April 25, 2018 ATTN: Dale Robins Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council (RTC) 1300 Franklin Street, 4th Floor Vancouver, Washington 98660 Re: Response to RFP Consultant Services for Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance Dear Mr. Dale Robins and Selection Committee, For nearly 95 years, travelers have crossed the Columbia River using the Hood River Bridge, which connects Hood River, Oregon and the communities of White Salmon and Bingen in Washington state. While the travelers are diverse - farmer, hiker, trucker, tugboat operator, windsurfer - their need is the same: a safe, reliable connection between Oregon and Washington. Today, the Hood River Bridge is failing to meet modern transportation demands: deteriorating bridge members, combined with dimensional and weight restrictions for trucks, hamper the structure’s effectiveness and, quite possibly, the regional economy. The replacement of the bridge is a critical transportation improvement needed to support the interstate travel of motorized vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists, and marine freight transport, which have significant local and regional economic and quality of life benefits. In 1999, a campaign to replace the existing bridge began, which then culminated into the 2003 Draft EIS, which was completed by Parsons Brinkerhoff now WSP. Following the Draft EIS, the firm conducted a Bridge TS&L study. From
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Barnard
    Robert Barnard Professional Experience: TriMet, Portland, Oregon Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail Transit Project Director 2008 to present Has primary responsibility for all aspects of project development and delivery, including final design and construction contracts. Manages staff responsible for administration of all design and construction contracts. Responsible for internal/external communications regarding project issues, and coordination with third parties. Monitors and reports cost and schedule status, change control and claims administration. Represents project to outside agencies and interests including the Federal Transit Administration, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and state and local governments. Has executive level role in negotiations and dispute resolution with contractors. Reports to the Executive Director, Capital Project Division. Mall Light Rail Project Design/Construction Director 2007 to 2009 Held primary responsibility for all contracts in $220 million Mall project, including the CM/GC civil/trackwork/systems contract.. Managed staff responsible for administration of all Mall contracts. Responsible for internal/external communications regarding project issues, and coordination with third parties. Monitored and reported cost and schedule status, change control and claims administration. Had top management level role in negotiations/dispute resolution with contractors. City of Portland, Office of Transportation, Portland, Oregon Project Manager 1992 to 2006 Responsible for successful delivery of large, complex,
    [Show full text]
  • Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Columbia River Crossing Project) 1
    Exhibit B Metro Council Resolution No. 11-4280 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law South/North Corridor Land Use Final Order Columbia River Crossing Project Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Columbia River Crossing Project) 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Nature of the Metro Council's Action This action adopts a Land Use Final Order (LUFO) for the Columbia River Crossing (CRC) Project, which is an element of the larger South/North Corridor Project. The action is taken pursuant to Oregon Laws 1996 (Special Session), Chapter 12 (referred to herein as "House Bill 3478" or "the Act"), which directs the Metro Council (Council) to issue LUFOs establishing the light rail route, light rail stations, park-and-ride lots and maintenance facilities, and any highway improvements to be included in the South/North Project, including their locations (i.e. the boundaries within which these facilities and improvements may be located). 1 This LUFO is the fifth in a series of LUFOs the Council has adopted for the South/North Project. The previously adopted LUFOs are as follows: • On July 23, 1998, the Metro Council adopted Resolution No. 98-2673 (the 1998 LUFO), establishing the initial light rail route, stations, lots and maintenance facilities and the highway improvements, including their locations, for the South/North Project. • On October 28, 1999, the Metro Council adopted Resolution No. 99-2853A (the 1999 LUFO), amending the 1998 LUFO to reflect revisions for that portion of the South/North Project extending from the Steel Bridge northward to the Portland Metropolitan Exposition Center (Expo Center), primarily along Interstate Avenue.
    [Show full text]