DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Building Sourcebook Land Use and Transportation Initiatives in Portland, Oregon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Community Building Sourcebook Land use and transportation initiatives in Portland, Oregon December 2007 December 2007 Dear Colleague: TriMet is pleased to provide this Community Building Sourcebook, which highlights the many land use and transportation accomplishments of the Portland, Oregon, region. This document is intended to provide snapshots of the innovative projects, plans and programs that shape our region’s growth. As you will see, Portland’s successes have depended upon partnerships among neighborhoods, local municipalities, regional interests, state agencies, environmental groups, developers and private fi nancial institutions. These partnerships are key to our successes. This document was a collaborative effort among TriMet, Metro and 1000 Friends of Oregon, originally published in 1999. Now in 2007 we are proud to present a revised edition of the Community Building Sourcebook to include new projects, programs and up-to- date information. A new chapter includes two transit-oriented development tours. We hope you fi nd the information and contacts helpful in your own work. Please feel free to call any of the listed representatives for more information. Sincerely, Fred Hansen General Manager Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Acknowledgments The 1999 edition of this report was a collaborative effort among 1000 Friends of Oregon, Metro and TriMet. The following individuals helped prepare and edit the 1999 Community Building Sourcebook: GB Arrington, Rob Bennett, Amy Carlsen-Kohnstamm, Phil Harris, Michael Kiser, Kim Knox, Barbara Linssen, Carlo Markewitz, Amy Norway, Lynn Peterson, Rhonda Ringering and Darcie White. TriMet led the 2005 update of the Community Building Sourcebook. Jillian Detweiler was the project manager. Leah Wyatt and LeAnne Brown were responsible for fact-checking and creating new electronic fi les. Sine Adams researched new transit-oriented development projects. TriMet initiated a third revision of the Community Building Sourcebook in 2007. Jillian Detweiler was the project manager. Arianna Chadwick-Saund was responsible for updating information, researching TODs and creating new electronic fi les. Production assistance was provided by Diane Goodwin, Patricia Williams and Monika Lackey. Geena Min designed the 2007 edition. Thanks to all project participants for working to achieve transit-oriented development ideals and to many others who provided assistance in compiling information for this Sourcebook. Capital Projects & Facilities 710 NE Holladay Street Portland, OR 97232 Tel: 503-962-2100 Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Table of Contents Chapter One–Transit Projects 1-1 The Total Transit Experience 1-2 MAX Blue Line (Gresham - Hillsboro) 1-4 MAX Red Line (Airport) 1-5 MAX Yellow Line (Expo - Portland City Center) 1-6 Portland Streetcar 1-7 Portland Aerial Tram 1-8 Washington County Commuter Rail 1-9 I-205 Light Rail 1-10 Portland Mall Light Rail 1-11 Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail 1-12 Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Alternatives (Previously called Willamette Shore Line) 1-13 Columbia River Crossing (Previously called I-5 Partnership) 1-14 Chapter Two–Plans and Policies 2-1 Oregon Land Use Planning Program 2-2 Urban Growth Boundaries 2-3 Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan 2-4 Transportation Planning Rule 2-5 Urban Growth Management 2-6 Regional Transportation Plan 2-7 Transit Investment Plan 2-8 Livable Streets 2-9 Central City Transportation Management Plan 2-10 Gresham Civic Neighborhood Plan 2-11 Gateway Regional Center 2-12 Westside Station Area Planning 2-13 Goose Hollow Station Plan 2-14 Hillsboro Station Community Planning 2-15 Washington County Station Area Planning 2-16 Interstate MAX Station Area Revitalization Strategy 2-17 Chapter Three–Transit-Oriented Developments 3-1 The Allegro 3-2 Arbor Vista Condominiums 3-3 Belmont Dairy 3-4 Buckman Heights, Buckman Terrace 3-5 Central Point, The Béranger 3-6 City Life 3-7 Collins Circle 3-8 County Library Mixed-Use Buildings 3-9 The Crossings 3-10 Crown Motel Redevelopment 3-11 Fairview Village 3-12 Gresham Central Apartments 3-13 LaSalle Apartments 3-14 Liberty Centre 3-15 Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Museum Place 3-16 The Oregon Clinic 3-17 Orenco Station 3-18 Pearl District 3-19 Richmond Place 3-20 The Round 3-21 Russellville 3-22 South Waterfront 3-23 West Gresham Apartments 3-24 Annotated TOD Bibliography 3-25 Chapter Four–Programs 4-1 Affordable Home Ownership Development Model 4-2 Bike and Pedestrian Programs 4-3 Business Energy Tax Credits 4-4 Employee Commute Options 4-5 Fareless Square 4-6 Flexcar 4-7 Gresham TOD Tax and Fee Exemptions 4-8 Hillsboro Local Improvement District 4-9 Portland Green Building Program 4-10 Portland TOD Tax Exemptions 4-11 TOD Implementation Program 4-12 Transportation and Growth Management Program 4-13 Transportation Demand Management Program 4-14 TriMet Public Art Program 4-15 Chapter Five–Organizations 5-1 1000 Friends of Oregon 5-2 Bicycle Transportation Alliance 5-3 City Club of Portland 5-4 City of Gresham 5-5 City Repair Project 5-6 Coalition for a Livable Future 5-7 Friends of Trees 5-8 Metro 5-9 Oregon Environmental Council 5-10 Portland Development Commission 5-11 ShoreBank Pacifi c 5-12 Chapter Six–Self-Guided Tours 6-1 Pearl District and South Waterfront Tour 6-2 Westside MAX TOD Tour 6-6 Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Chapter One Transit Projects Chapter One • Transit Projects Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Carolyn Young Executive Director Programs & Communications The Total Transit Experience TriMet 503-962-7562 trimet.org TriMet provides transportation well as stop locations. This includes rail since the fi rst line opened in 1986. options for thousands of Portland- the walk (or sometimes drive) to the TriMet’s focus on on-street bus stop area residents every day. station or stop and the quality of the amenities and customer information station or stop environment. Transit TriMet operates more than 600 is another aspect of our attention to frequency and ease of transfers are buses on 91 bus routes, with 7,625 the total transit experience. TriMet part of the experience, as is the ride bus stops and 1,100 bus shelters. and Metro prepared an inventory of itself. Then there’s the walk to the The MAX light rail system stretches the sidewalk infrastructure used to set fi nal destination and the ability to 44 miles. TriMet provides 8,112 priorities for sidewalk and crosswalk complete the round-trip with ease. parking spaces in 21 Park & Ride needs. New shelters are installed To meet transit needs as the region lots around the region, with 36 each year. Bus stop maintenance is grows, TriMet is working to address additional lots shared with churches, promoted through an adopt-a-stop all of these elements, in addition to retail businesses and theaters. In program, and new shelter designs the basic job of getting transit service addition to the fi xed route service, help prevent graffi ti. Innovations such on the street. TriMet meets the needs of elderly and as the web-based Trip Planner make disabled individuals with the LIFT and TriMet’s planning is grounded in the planning transit trips easy. Transit medical transportation programs. Region 2040 Framework Plan and Tracker provides real-time information the Regional Transportation Plan. about transit arrivals. Compete to succeed This coordination assures land use and transportation will continue to be Special district During the 1960s and ‘70s, many integrated and mutually supportive, public transit systems were reduced TriMet is a special district of the allowing the region to grow smarter, to an extension of the welfare system. State of Oregon and is governed by to makes best use of its infrastructure The low quality of service refl ected a seven-member Board of Directors investments and to improve the the notion that transit riders had no appointed by the governor. TriMet’s livability for all citizens of this region. other choice. service area covers much of three The region works hard to maximize counties, nearly 600 square miles TriMet’s success is predicated on the the signifi cant transit investments by with a population of 1.4 million. The idea that its riders have other choices, connecting transit with land use. Light Board appointed TriMet General and the agency must compete to rail stations generally have a station Manager Fred Hansen in October succeed. The concept of a “total area zoning overlay. TriMet and 1998. transit experience” refl ects the Metro each manage transit-oriented elements of a transit trip that must be A regional payroll tax provided 57 development programs, with TriMet’s addressed in order to attract riders to percent of 2006 TriMet operating largely tied to the use of excess transit. revenue. The tax is $6.52 per $1,000 rights of way, joint use conversion of on gross payroll. Passenger revenue The transit patron’s “total transit transit facilities or review of signifi cant accounted for 21percent of the experience” begins when planning a projects in consultation with partner budget; state/federal operating trip. A potential transit rider may need jurisdictions. More than $6 billion in grants 13 percent; and other sources schedule and route information as development has occurred along light 9 percent. HISTORY 1969: TriMet formed after Rose City Transit bankruptcy. 1976-1977: The 22-block Portland Transit Mall is built — one of the fi rst of its kind in the nation. 1982-1986: The 15-mile Eastside MAX light rail line is built between downtown Portland and Gresham. 1989: TriMet named “America’s Best Large Transit Agency” by the American Public Transit Association. 1994: Transit Mall extended to Union Station. 1998: The 18-mile Westside MAX extension begins service to Beaverton and Hillsboro. 2001: Airport MAX line opens with service from downtown to the Portland International Airport.
Recommended publications
  • Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2019 Progress Report

    Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2019 Progress Report

    Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2019 Progress Report December 2019 Progress Report i This page intentionally left blank. ii Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2, 2019 (Electronic Transmittal Only) The Honorable Governor Inslee The Honorable Kate Brown WA Senate Transportation Committee Oregon Transportation Commission WA House Transportation Committee OR Joint Committee on Transportation Dear Governors, Transportation Commission, and Transportation Committees: On behalf of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), we are pleased to submit the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program status report, as directed by Washington’s 2019-21 transportation budget ESHB 1160, section 306 (24)(e)(iii). The intent of this report is to share activities that have lead up to the beginning of the biennium, accomplishments of the program since funding was made available, and future steps to be completed by the program as it moves forward with the clear support of both states. With the appropriation of $35 million in ESHB 1160 to open a project office and restart work to replace the Interstate Bridge, Governor Inslee and the Washington State Legislature acknowledged the need to renew efforts for replacement of this aging infrastructure. Governor Kate Brown and the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) directed ODOT to coordinate with WSDOT on the establishment of a project office. The OTC also allocated $9 million as the state’s initial contribution, and Oregon Legislative leadership appointed members to a Joint Committee on the Interstate Bridge. These actions demonstrate Oregon’s agreement that replacement of the Interstate 5 Bridge is vital. As is conveyed in this report, the program office is working to set this project up for success by working with key partners to build the foundation as we move forward toward project development.
  • Evaluation Summary Public Review Draft

    Evaluation Summary Public Review Draft

    Evaluation Summary Public Review Draft July 12, 2007 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.0. Corridor Background.................................................................................................................... 2 2.0. Study Organization and Decision-Making................................................................................... 4 3.0. Purpose and Need of the Alternative Analysis............................................................................ 5 3.1. Need for Transit Project.......................................................................................................... 5 3.2. Purpose and Need Statements................................................................................................. 6 4.0 Definition of Alternatives ............................................................................................................ 7 4.1. Early Alternatives Screened Out............................................................................................. 7 4.2. Alternatives Carried Forward ................................................................................................. 8 4.3 Capacity Considerations…………………………………………………………………….15 5.0. Evaluation of Alternatives ........................................................................................................ 17 5.1. Travel Time and Ridership..................................................................................................
  • Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Report

    Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Report

    Report to the Washington State Legislature Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory December 2017 Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Errata The Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory published to WSDOT’s website on December 1, 2017 contained the following errata. The items below have been corrected in versions downloaded or printed after January 10, 2018. Section 4, page 62: Corrects the parties to the tolling agreement between the States—the Washington State Transportation Commission and the Oregon Transportation Commission. Miscellaneous sections and pages: Minor grammatical corrections. Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory | December 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary. .1 Section 1: Introduction. .29 Legislative Background to this Report Purpose and Structure of this Report Significant Characteristics of the Project Area Prior Work Summary Section 2: Long-Range Planning . .35 Introduction Bi-State Transportation Committee Portland/Vancouver I-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership Task Force The Transition from Long-Range Planning to Project Development Section 3: Context and Constraints . 41 Introduction Guiding Principles: Vision and Values Statement & Statement of Purpose and Need Built and Natural Environment Navigation and Aviation Protected Species and Resources Traffic Conditions and Travel Demand Safety of Bridge and Highway Facilities Freight Mobility Mobility for Transit, Pedestrian and Bicycle Travel Section 4: Funding and Finance. 55 Introduction Funding and Finance Plan Evolution During
  • Exhibit a Section 143: Urban Center Zones

    Exhibit a Section 143: Urban Center Zones

    EXHIBIT A SECTION 143: URBAN CENTER ZONES CONTENTS SECTION 143: URBAN CENTER ZONES ........................................................................... 1 I. Purpose and Applicability ........................................................................................................ 1 A. Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 1 B. Applicability ............................................................................................................................... 1 II. Land Use Zones ........................................................................................................................ 2 A. Urban Center – Residential Medium Density (UC‐RM) ............................................................. 2 B. Urban Center – Mixed Use Urban Density (UC‐MU) ................................................................. 2 C. Urban Center – Activity Center (UC‐AC) .................................................................................... 3 D. Urban Center – Neighborhood Center (UC‐NC) ........................................................................ 3 E. Urban Center – Office/Research (UC‐OR) ................................................................................. 3 F. Urban Center – Research Park (UC‐RP) ..................................................................................... 3 III. Housing Types ........................................................................................................................
  • Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical

    Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical

    METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL
  • State of the River 2006-07

    State of the River 2006-07

    State of the River 2006–07 iver Renaissance is the City of Portland’s initiative to reclaim the Willamette River as a community centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the Columbia River. The Willamette is the heart of Portland’s landscape, history, and culture. The Columbia is our economic and ecologic lifeline to the Pacific. River Renaissance Rpromotes and celebrates these waters as living emblems of Portland’s identity. Portland lives its river values every day in ways big and small. Together these actions are reconnecting citizens and businesses with a healthier river. The State of the River Report profiles yearly accomplishments and identifi es future actions needed to assure a clean and healthy river, a prosperous harbor, and vibrant riverfronts. Just a few of the actions detailed in this report are illustrated on this page to give some idea of how deeply Portland believes in caring for—and being cared for by—our rivers. 2006–07 State of the River Report Contents River Renaissance is a Leadership . 2 community-wide initiative to Message from the River Renaissance Directors . 3 reclaim the Willamette River Introduction . 4 as Portland’s centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the How the City that Works Works on the River . 5 Columbia River. The initiative Accomplishments and Key Actions . 7 promotes and celebrates Portland’s Progress Measures . 23 waters as our chief environmental, 2007–2008 Action Agenda . 35 economic and urban asset. Up and Down the Willamette . 55 Partners . 61 Recommended Readings . 63 The 2006–07 State of the River Report summarizes the achievements made by the City of Portland and a network of community partners to revitalize our rivers and identifies next steps needed to continue progress.
  • CHRISTOPHER PATTON, Plaintiff, V. SEPTA, Faye LM Moore, and Cecil

    CHRISTOPHER PATTON, Plaintiff, V. SEPTA, Faye LM Moore, and Cecil

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : CHRISTOPHER PATTON, : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 06-707 : SEPTA, Faye L. M. Moore, : and Cecil W. Bond Jr., : Defendants. : Memorandum and Order YOHN, J. January ___, 2007 Plaintiff Christopher Patton brings the instant action pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq . (“ADA”); the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 955(a) (“PHRA”); and Article I of the Pennsylvania Constitution, against defendants Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”); SEPTA’s General Manager, Faye L. M. Moore; and SEPTA’s Assistant General Manager, Cecil W. Bond Jr. (collectively, “defendants”). Presently before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, as to plaintiff’s claims under the PHRA against defendants Moore and Bond (Counts VII and VIII), plaintiff’s claims for violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution (Counts XI, XII, and XIII) and plaintiff’s demand for punitive damages. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part. 1 I. Factual and Procedural Background A. Plaintiff’s Factual Allegations Plaintiff was hired by SEPTA on December 8, 1997 to develop and direct its Capital and Long Range Planning Department. (Second Am. Compl. (“Compl.”) ¶ 14.) Defendant Moore, is the General Manager of SEPTA (id . at ¶¶ 6, 13); defendant Bond is the Assistant General Manager of SEPTA (id.
  • TRANSIT SYSTEM MAP Local Routes E

    TRANSIT SYSTEM MAP Local Routes E

    Non-Metro Service 99 Woodlands Express operates three Park & 99 METRO System Sistema de METRO Ride lots with service to the Texas Medical W Center, Greenway Plaza and Downtown. To Kingwood P&R: (see Park & Ride information on reverse) H 255, 259 CALI DR A To Townsen P&R: HOLLOW TREE LN R Houston D 256, 257, 259 Northwest Y (see map on reverse) 86 SPRING R E Routes are color-coded based on service frequency during the midday and weekend periods: Medical F M D 91 60 Las rutas están coloradas por la frecuencia de servicio durante el mediodía y los fines de semana. Center 86 99 P&R E I H 45 M A P §¨¦ R E R D 15 minutes or better 20 or 30 minutes 60 minutes Weekday peak periods only T IA Y C L J FM 1960 V R 15 minutes o mejor 20 o 30 minutos 60 minutos Solo horas pico de días laborales E A D S L 99 T L E E R Y B ELLA BLVD D SPUR 184 FM 1960 LV R D 1ST ST S Lone Star Routes with two colors have variations in frequency (e.g. 15 / 30 minutes) on different segments as shown on the System Map. T A U College L E D Peak service is approximately 2.5 hours in the morning and 3 hours in the afternoon. Exact times will vary by route. B I N N 249 E 86 99 D E R R K ") LOUETTA RD EY RD E RICHEY W A RICH E RI E N K W S R L U S Rutas con dos colores (e.g.
  • Rider Guide / Guía De Pasajeros

    Rider Guide / Guía De Pasajeros

    Updated 02/10/2019 Rider Guide / Guía de Pasajeros Stations / Estaciones Stations / Estaciones Northline Transit Center/HCC Theater District Melbourne/North Lindale Central Station Capitol Lindale Park Central Station Rusk Cavalcade Convention District Moody Park EaDo/Stadium Fulton/North Central Coffee Plant/Second Ward Quitman/Near Northside Lockwood/Eastwood Burnett Transit Center/Casa De Amigos Altic/Howard Hughes UH Downtown Cesar Chavez/67th St Preston Magnolia Park Transit Center Central Station Main l Transfer to Green or Purple Rail Lines (see map) Destination Signs / Letreros Direccionales Westbound – Central Station Capitol Eastbound – Central Station Rusk Eastbound Theater District to Magnolia Park Hacia el este Magnolia Park Main Street Square Bell Westbound Magnolia Park to Theater District Downtown Transit Center Hacia el oeste Theater District McGowen Ensemble/HCC Wheeler Transit Center Museum District Hermann Park/Rice U Stations / Estaciones Memorial Hermann Hospital/Houston Zoo Theater District Dryden/TMC Central Station Capitol TMC Transit Center Central Station Rusk Smith Lands Convention District Stadium Park/Astrodome EaDo/Stadium Fannin South Leeland/Third Ward Elgin/Third Ward Destination Signs / Letreros Direccionales TSU/UH Athletics District Northbound Fannin South to Northline/HCC UH South/University Oaks Hacia el norte Northline/HCC MacGregor Park/Martin Luther King, Jr. Southbound Northline/HCC to Fannin South Palm Center Transit Center Hacia el sur Fannin South Destination Signs / Letreros Direccionales Eastbound Theater District to Palm Center TC Hacia el este Palm Center Transit Center Westbound Palm Center TC to Theater District Hacia el oeste Theater District The Fare/Pasaje / Local Make Your Ride on METRORail Viaje en METRORail Rápido y Fare Type Full Fare* Discounted** Transfer*** Fast and Easy Fácil Tipo de Pasaje Pasaje Completo* Descontado** Transbordo*** 1.
  • Service Guidelines and Standards

    Service Guidelines and Standards

    Service Guidelines and Standards Revised Summer 2015 Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority | Austin, Texas TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Purpose 3 Overview 3 Update 3 Service Types 4 SERVICE GUIDELINES Density and Service Coverage 5 Land Use 6 Destinations and Activity Centers 6 Streets and Sidewalk Characteristics 7 Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics 7 Route Directness 8 Route Deviation 9 Two-way Service 10 Branching and Short-Turns 10 Route Spacing 11 Route Length 11 Route Terminals 11 Service Span 12 Service Frequency 12 Bus Stop Spacing 13 Bus Stop Placement 13 Bus Stop Amenities 14 MetroRapid Stations vs. Bus Stops 15 Transit Centers and Park & Rides 15 SERVICE STANDARDS Schedule Reliability 19 Load Factors 19 Ridership Productivity and Cost-Effectiveness 20 Potential Corrective Actions 21 New and Altered Services 21 Service Change Process 22 APPENDIX A1: Map – Households without Access to an Automobile 24 A2: Map – Elderly Population Exceeding 10% of Total Population 25 A3: Map - Youth Population Exceeding 25% by Census Block 26 A4: Map – Household Income Below 50% of Regional Median 27 B1: Chart – Park & Ride Level of Service (LOS) Amenities 28 Service Guidelines and Standards INTRODUCTION Purpose The Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority connects people, jobs and communities by providing quality transportation choices. Service guidelines and standards reflect the goals and objectives of the Authority. Capital Metro Strategic Goals: 1) Provide a Great Customer Experience 2) Improve Business Practices 3) Demonstrate the Value of Public Transportation in an Active Community 4) Be a Regional Leader Overview Service guidelines provide a framework for the provision, design, and allocation of service. Service guidelines incorporate transit service planning factors including residential and employment density, land use, activity centers, street characteristics, and demographics.
  • Hassalo on Eighth Is Located in Portland’S Close-In Eastside, Lloyd Neighborhood Where the East Side Meets the Central City

    Hassalo on Eighth Is Located in Portland’S Close-In Eastside, Lloyd Neighborhood Where the East Side Meets the Central City

    FULLY LEASED DAN BOZICH CHRIS SULLIVAN HASSALO KIA HARTLEY BRIAN GREELEY ON 10,329 SF (remaining) AMERICAN ASSETS TRUST 858.350.2584 503.228.3080 FULLY LEASED AMERICANASSETS.COM EIGHTH URBANWORKSREALESTATE.COM CURRENT RETAILERS INCLUDE: 657 GSF FOR-RENT HOUSING UNITS 592,616 GSF OF HOUSING 31,707 GSF OF RETAIL 26,000 GSF ANCHOR RETAIL TENANT 271,582 GSF OF OFFICE Aster & Velomor Building view from Plaza. 1,200 GSF PARKING STALLS, MOSTLY PROJECT UNDERGROUND SUSTAINABILITY LEED PLATINUM WITHIN AN OVERVIEW ECO-DISTRICT FRAMEWORK Hassalo on Eighth is located in Portland’s close-in Eastside, Lloyd neighborhood where the east side meets the central city. There is a gap in the urban grid where mid-century planning principals called for surface parking lots in lieu of dense, walkable communities. We are repairing this urban fabric with the creation of a mixed-use, dense development that creates a 24-hour neighborhood. Velomor view from NE Holladay We want people to make Hassalo their home, their office, and their playground. We want to invite families to live a more urban lifestyle by providing them the amenities and business they need. We want to invite young professionals to live in a dense, diverse, and transit-oriented neighborhood and entice the restaurants and retail stores that cater to their needs. And we want to invite people to live with 360 degree views of downtown, Mt. Hood, Forest Park, and the Willamette River. The development offers a variety of housing options and retail spaces that can cater to a wide range of people and businesses.
  • Frog Ferry Presentation

    Frog Ferry Presentation

    Frog Ferry Portland-Vancouver Passenger Water Taxi Service Frog= Shwah-kuk in the Chinookan Tribal Language, Art: Adam McIssac CONFIDENTIAL-Susan Bladholm Version 2018 Q1 Canoes and Frog Mythology on the Columbia & Willamette Rivers The ability to travel the waters of the Columbia and Willamette rivers has allowed people to become intertwined through trade and commerce for centuries by canoe. The journal entries of Lewis and Clark in 1805 described the shores of the Columbia River as being lined with canoes elaborately carved from cedar trees. The ability to navigate these waterways gave the Chinook people control over vast reaches of the Columbia River basin for hundreds of years. The area surrounding the Columbia and Willamette rivers is steeped in a rich mythology told to us through early ethnographers who traveled the river documenting Native American inhabitants and their culture. According to Chinookan mythology, Frog (Shwekheyk in Chinook language), was given the basics of weavable fiber by his relatives, Snake and omnipotent Coyote. With this fiber, Frog was given the task of creating the cordage for the weaving of the first fishing net. With this net, made from fibers of nettle plants, Frog had made it possible for the new human beings to catch their first salmon. Coyote tested the net, with the guidance and wisdom of his three sisters, thereby establishing the complex set of taboos associated with the catching of the first salmon of the season. The Chinook people would never eat or harm Frog for his association to them would always protect him. That is why you should always step around frogs and never over them.