Lake Oswego Portland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lake Oswego Portland Lake Oswego to Portland TRANSIT PROJECT Public scoping report August 2008 Metro People places. Open spaces. Clean air and clean water do not stop at city limits or county lines. Neither does the need for jobs, a thriving economy and good transportation choices for people and businesses in our region. Voters have asked Metro to help with the challenges that cross those lines and affect the 25 cities and three coun- ties in the Portland metropolitan area. A regional approach simply makes sense when it comes to protecting open space, caring for parks, planning for the best use of land, managing garbage disposal and increasing recycling. Metro oversees world-class facilities such as the Oregon Zoo, which contributes to conservation and educa- tion, and the Oregon Convention Center, which benefits the region’s economy Metro representatives Metro Council President – David Bragdon Metro Councilors – Rod Park, District 1; Carlotta Collette, District 2; Carl Hosticka, District 3; Kathryn Harrington, District 4; Rex Burkholder, District 5; Robert Liberty, District 6. Auditor – Suzanne Flynn www.oregonmetro.gov Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project Public scoping report Table of contents SECTION 1: SCOPING REPORT INTRODUCTION …………………………………......... 1 Introduction Summary of outreach activities Summary of agency scoping comments Public comment period findings Conclusion SECTION 2: PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING ………………………………………………… 7 Summary Handouts SECTION 3: AGENCY SCOPING COMMENTS ………………………………………..... 31 Environmental Protection Agency SECTION 4: PUBLIC SCOPING COMMENTS ……………………………………..…….. 45 Comment cards Letters E-mails SECTION 5: OUTREACH MATERIALS …………………………………………………. 215 Media advisory Newspaper advertisement Postcard Federal Register Notice of Intent SECTION 6: INDEX OF COMMENTS …………………………………………………… 223 Alphabetical listing of commenters SCOPING REPORT Introduction Summary of outreach activities Summary of agency scoping comments Public comment period findings Conclusion INTRODUCTION Ninety-six public comments were received during the scoping period between April 21, 2008, and July 18, 2008, for the Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project. The scoping process was designed to gather public input on three aspects of the project: the proposed Purpose and Need statement for the project, the proposed alternatives to be studied in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, and any specific environmental or community impacts that need to be addressed in the DEIS. For a full report on public involvement and comments on the project, refer to the Alternatives Analysis Public Comment Report dated September 2007 and its addendum dated December 2007. For copies of these reports, visit the project web site at www.oregonmetro.gov/lakeoswego or call 503-797-1756. Preliminary statement of purpose of and need for the project The project is needed because mobility and traffic conditions in this corridor are projected to worsen as population and employment projections for Portland and Clackamas County continue to grow, especially on the west side of the Willamette River. The corridor already experiences long traffic queues, poor levels of service and significant capacity constraints at key locations. Travel times in the corridor for traffic and bus transit are unreliable due to congestion on Highway 43. The purpose of the Portland to Lake Oswego Transit Project is to develop transit that meets future travel demand, supports local and regional land use plans, and garners public acceptance and community support; and which will: • increase the mobility and accessibility within the geographically constrained Highway 43 Corridor connecting from the Portland Central City through the Lake Oswego Town Center • minimize traffic and parking related impacts to neighborhoods • support and enhance existing neighborhood character in an environmentally sensitive manner • cost effectively increase corridor and system-wide transit ridership • support transit-oriented economic development in Portland and Lake Oswego • improve transportation access to and connectivity among significant destinations and activity centers • increase transportation choices in the corridor, and access for persons with disabilities • integrate effectively with other transportation modes • anticipate future needs and impacts and not preclude future expansion opportunities. Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project public scoping report, August 2008 1 SUMMARY OF OUTREACH ACTIVITIES A media advisory was distributed on April 17, 2008, to announce the public comment period and the public meeting on April 21, 2008. Newspaper advertisements were placed in the Southwest zone of the Oregonian on April 10, 2008, and in the Lake Oswego Review, the West Linn Tidings, the Oregon City News and the Clackamas Review on April 9 and 10, 2008, and postcard invitations were mailed to business and property owners along the proposed alignments as well as interested persons, advocacy groups, neighborhood groups and elected officials on April 9, 2008, to announce the public meeting, invite participation and encourage use of the project web page. A Notice of Intent was submitted to the Federal Register and published in the April 16, 2008, edition. SUMMARY OF AGENCY SCOPING COMMENTS Environmental Protection Agency The U.S. EPA reviewed the Federal Register Notice of Intent to prepare the project Environmental Impact Statement and submitted scoping comments on July 18, 2008 in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. The comments offer the EPA’s recommendations for potential areas of impact that should be assessed and addressed during the EIS process and document. These areas of impact are: • indirect and cumulative effects • aquatic resources • river, stream, riparian and floodplain encroachment • 303(d) listed waters and total maximum daily loads • source water protection areas • climate change • ecological connectivity • endangered, threatened, candidate, sensitive species • air toxics • community impact assessment • environmental justice • tribal consultation • cultural resources • invasive species. The text of the comments can be found in the agency scoping comments section of this document (page 31). 2 Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project public scoping report, August 2008 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FINDINGS Public comments were received between April 21, 2008 and July 18, 2008. Public scoping meeting The April 21, 2008, public scoping meeting was held at the Lakewood Center for the Arts in Lake Oswego and included handouts, a presentation and a question and answer session. Comment cards were distributed for inclusion in the record. Public testimony and responses to the information presented are included in the comment summaries below. The full meeting summary can be found in the public scoping meeting section of this document (page 7). Comment cards Twenty-nine comment cards were received during the public scoping period. Four cards stated support for the use of the Willamette Shoreline right of way for the streetcar alignment. Four cards stated opposition to or concerns about the use of the Willamette Shoreline right of way. The Safeway terminus and Albertsons terminus were each given support by one comment card. Four comment cards stated support for a bicycle path or trail to be part of the project. Ten comment cards directly stated support for streetcar to Lake Oswego. Of those that offered an alignment or terminus preference one stated support for an alignment through John’s Landing with the Safeway terminus, four stated support for the use of the Willamette Shoreline right of way, one of which came with a letter of testimony representing five Foothills area residents. Four cards implied support for streetcar to Lake Oswego. One card stated support for streetcar or bus rapid transit to Lake Oswego, supporting the Albertsons terminus and a circulator in Lake Oswego to retain the bus stops at Safeway. One said that streetcar has to be separate from Highway 43 traffic to be a successful alternative. One said that the streetcar should be extended to West Linn for a park and ride outside of Lake Oswego and that another river crossing would support Clackamas County to Washington County commuters. One card simply stated support for mass transit to Lake Oswego from Portland. Four comment cards stated opposition to the streetcar and/or preference for an enhanced bus service on Highway 43 rather than streetcar service. One of these cited safety concerns and one suggested a dedicated biodiesel bus lane on Highway 43 during peak hours, and another suggested that if streetcar goes to Lake Oswego, it should continue to West Linn for a park and ride outside of Lake Oswego. One of the four cards opposing the use of the Willamette Shoreline right of way was submitted with a letter of testimony. Those opposed to the use of the right of way cited safety, property impacts, lack of potential riders and cost as issues with this alignment, asking how the safety of pedestrians and children through residential areas would be ensured, whether the park and ride would have capacity spill over, and how the Milwaukie light rail line would impact cost per rider and demand projections. Two others expressed concerns about the impact of streetcar through the corridor, one worried that the streetcar speed needed to meet travel time estimates would be a safety hazard, and one questioned how a downtown park and ride would affect traffic in Lake Oswego and whether the Lake Oswego growth will be
Recommended publications
  • Sellwood Bridge May 8, 2018 Project Overview Project Overview
    SELLWOOD BRIDGE MAY 8, 2018 PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT OVERVIEW • Procurement: CMGC • Owner: Multnomah County • Location: Portland, Oregon • Contract Value: $227,000,000 • Construction Timeline: • Started: December 2011 • Completed: January 2017 PROJECT TEAM • Agencies • Multnomah County • City of Portland • Oregon Department of Transportation • Federal Highway Administration • Designers/Consultants • T. Y. Lin International • CH2M Hill • David Evans and Associates • General Contractor • Slayden/Sundt Joint Venture HISTORY • Originally a Ferry Crossing • Original Sellwood Bridge - Opened 1925 • In depth inspections - mid 1980’s & 2003 • Further “Band aids” were installed • Loads Restrictions enforced in 2004 • In-depth inspection/evaluation 2005 • Structural rating - 2 out of 100 Local RR OR 43 to Tracks Portland Cemetery Willamette River Sellwood Landslide Riverpark and Sellwood Harbor OR 43 to Condos Lake Oswego CMGC PROCUREMENT CMGC CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/GENERAL CONTRACTOR • Collaboration between Owner, Designer, and Contractor • Up to Date Market Pricing • Design development Owner • Constructability Reviews • Value Engineering • ROW/TCE acquisition & Phasing • Schedule Development • Risk Management A/E Collaboration GC • Other Owner Drivers: • Sustainability • Public involvement • Minority Goals PRECONSTRUCTION • 7 Amendments (Design Packages) • Able to release packages early to start work • Shoofly • Landslide • Condo Demo/Reconstruct • Main Bridge - GMP • 60%, 90%, and 100% cost estimates • After each pricing exercise adjustments are made to validate the design aligns with the owners budget • Design Modifications • Value Engineering • Material Selections • Means and Methods Evaluated CONTRACTING PLAN • DMWESB Goal - 20% • Created a Contracting Plan with the Owner: • 4 Categories • Project Final DMWESB: • 20.41% • $45,491,206 SMALL GC PACKAGES • 4 scopes of work separated into GC-type packages • Subcontractor solicitation, best value scoring, and scope management for the entire scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited Horizons on the Oregon Frontier : East Tualatin Plains and the Town of Hillsboro, Washington County, 1840-1890
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1988 Limited horizons on the Oregon frontier : East Tualatin Plains and the town of Hillsboro, Washington County, 1840-1890 Richard P. Matthews Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Matthews, Richard P., "Limited horizons on the Oregon frontier : East Tualatin Plains and the town of Hillsboro, Washington County, 1840-1890" (1988). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3808. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5692 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Richard P. Matthews for the Master of Arts in History presented 4 November, 1988. Title: Limited Horizons on the Oregon Frontier: East Tualatin Plains and the Town of Hillsboro, Washington county, 1840 - 1890. APPROVED BY MEMBE~~~ THESIS COMMITTEE: David Johns n, ~on B. Dodds Michael Reardon Daniel O'Toole The evolution of the small towns that originated in Oregon's settlement communities remains undocumented in the literature of the state's history for the most part. Those .::: accounts that do exist are often amateurish, and fail to establish the social and economic links between Oregon's frontier towns to the agricultural communities in which they appeared. The purpose of the thesis is to investigate an early settlement community and the small town that grew up in its midst in order to better understand the ideological relationship between farmers and townsmen that helped shape Oregon's small towns.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Voters' Pamphlet
    Washington Elections Division 3700 SW Murray Blvd. Beaverton, OR 97005 County www.co.washington.or.us voters’ pamphlet VOTE-BY-MAIL PRIMARY NOMINATING ELECTION May 20, 2008 To be counted, voted ballots must be in our office by 8:00 pm on May 20, 2008 Washington County Dear Voter: Board of County This pamphlet contains information for several dis- Commissioners tricts and there may be candidates/measures included that are not on your ballot. If you have any questions, Tom Brian, Chair call 503-846-5800. Dick Schouten, District 1 Desari Strader, District 2 Roy Rogers, District 3 Attention: Andy Duyck, District 4 Washington County Elections prints information as submitted. We do not correct spelling, punctuation, grammar, syntax, errors or inaccurate information. W-2 W-3 W-4 WASHINGTON COUNTY Commissioner, District 3 Roy R. Rogers (Nonpartisan) OCCUPATION: Certified Public Accountant /County Commissioner OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Managing Partner of large local firm. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Portland State University; Bachelor of Science Degree; Numerous additional courses in finance, management, and public finance. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: County Commissioner (current); Mayor, City of Tualatin (3 terms); President Oregon Mayors Association; Clean Water Services Board; Numerous State, Regional and County Transportation and Planning Committees; Board Member of Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol, Urban Road Maintenance and Housing Authority Districts ROY IS INVOLVED! • Tigard First Citizen • Past President - Tigard Rotary, Tigard Chamber, Tigard
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Report
    Report to the Washington State Legislature Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory December 2017 Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Errata The Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory published to WSDOT’s website on December 1, 2017 contained the following errata. The items below have been corrected in versions downloaded or printed after January 10, 2018. Section 4, page 62: Corrects the parties to the tolling agreement between the States—the Washington State Transportation Commission and the Oregon Transportation Commission. Miscellaneous sections and pages: Minor grammatical corrections. Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory | December 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary. .1 Section 1: Introduction. .29 Legislative Background to this Report Purpose and Structure of this Report Significant Characteristics of the Project Area Prior Work Summary Section 2: Long-Range Planning . .35 Introduction Bi-State Transportation Committee Portland/Vancouver I-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership Task Force The Transition from Long-Range Planning to Project Development Section 3: Context and Constraints . 41 Introduction Guiding Principles: Vision and Values Statement & Statement of Purpose and Need Built and Natural Environment Navigation and Aviation Protected Species and Resources Traffic Conditions and Travel Demand Safety of Bridge and Highway Facilities Freight Mobility Mobility for Transit, Pedestrian and Bicycle Travel Section 4: Funding and Finance. 55 Introduction Funding and Finance Plan Evolution During
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit a History of Public Transit in Portland
    Hilary Pfeifer Meredith Dittmar PUBLIC TRANSIT A history of public transit in Portland Melody Owen Mark Richardson Smith Kristin Mitsu Shiga Chandra Bocci trimet.org/history Traveling through time Dear Reader, Transit plays a critical role in providing options for traveling throughout the region. It connects people to work, school, recreational destinations and essential services. It’s not just a commuter service. It’s a community asset. And the benefits extend far beyond those who ride. TriMet’s transit system is recognized as a national leader for its connection to land use. By linking land-use planning and transit, we have helped create livable communities, vibrant neighborhoods and provide alternatives to driving. Transit is also a catalyst for economic development. More than $10 billion in transit-oriented development has occurred within walking distance of MAX light rail stations since the decision to build in 1980. Developers like the permanence of rail when investing in projects. Transit is also valued by the community. Most of our riders— 81 percent—are choice riders. They have a car available or choose not to own one so they can ride TriMet. With more than 325,000 trips taken each weekday on our buses, MAX Light Rail and WES Commuter Rail, we eliminate 66 million annual car trips. That eases traffic congestion and helps keep our air clean. TriMet carries more people than any other U.S. transit system our size. Our many innovations have drawn the attention of government leaders, planners, transit providers and transit users from around the world. We didn’t start out that way.
    [Show full text]
  • Pamplin Media Group - the Rise Central Is About to Rise in Downtown Beaverton
    Pamplin Media Group - The Rise Central is about to rise in downtown Beaverton Friday, October 20, 2017 HOME NEWS OPINION FEATURES SPORTS OBITUARIES BUSINESS SHOP LOCAL CLASSIFIEDS ABOUT US FONT SHARE THIS MORE STORIES - A + < > The Rise Central is about to rise in downtown Beaverton Jules Rogers Thursday, October 12, 2017 DAILY NEWS WHERE YOU LIVE 0 Comments Beaverton Hillsboro Prineville Clackamas Lake Oswego Sandy Rembold Properties adds mixed-use Canby Madras Sellwood Columbia Co. Milwaukie Sherwood living to a downtown Beaverton group of Estacada Molalla Tigard developments. Forest Grove Newberg Tualatin Gladstone Oregon City West Linn Gresham Portland Wilsonville King City Portland SE Woodburn Happy Valley Portland SW SPECIAL INTEREST Biz Trib Wheels Public Notices Sustainable KPAM 860 Sunny 1550 Latest Comments Social Media Search SOURCE: CITY OF BEAVERTON, BY ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS - A rendering of The Rise Central shows what it will look like when completed. Go to top http://portlandtribune.com/bvt/15-news/375144-255917-the-rise-central-is-about-to-rise-in-downtown-beaverton[10/20/2017 12:21:47 PM] Pamplin Media Group - The Rise Central is about to rise in downtown Beaverton Two new mixed-use buildings with all the fixings (dog and bike wash stations, retail, office, live-work units and bike storage a walkable distance from the MAX) are underway — in the suburbs. As part of the Beaverton Central development, a I Felt So compilation of projects located at the former Westgate Theater property and The Round, construction is Betrayed underway on two mixed-use buildings — called The Rise Central — which will include 230 residential units and 5,000 square feet of office space and retail space on the ground floor.
    [Show full text]
  • “We'll All Start Even”
    Gary Halvorson, Oregon State Archives Gary Halvorson, Oregon State “We’ll All Start Even” White Egalitarianism and the Oregon Donation Land Claim Act KENNETH R. COLEMAN THIS MURAL, located in the northwest corner of the Oregon State Capitol rotunda, depicts John In Oregon, as in other parts of the world, theories of White superiority did not McLoughlin (center) of the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) welcoming Presbyterian missionaries guarantee that Whites would reign at the top of a racially satisfied world order. Narcissa Whitman and Eliza Spalding to Fort Vancouver in 1836. Early Oregon land bills were That objective could only be achieved when those theories were married to a partly intended to reduce the HBC’s influence in the region. machinery of implementation. In America during the nineteenth century, the key to that eventuality was a social-political system that tied economic and political power to land ownership. Both the Donation Land Claim Act of 1850 and the 1857 Oregon Constitution provision barring Blacks from owning real Racist structures became ingrained in the resettlement of Oregon, estate guaranteed that Whites would enjoy a government-granted advantage culminating in the U.S. Congress’s passing of the DCLA.2 Oregon’s settler over non-Whites in the pursuit of wealth, power, and privilege in the pioneer colonists repeatedly invoked a Jacksonian vision of egalitarianism rooted in generation and each generation that followed. White supremacy to justify their actions, including entering a region where Euro-Americans were the minority and — without U.S. sanction — creating a government that reserved citizenship for White males.3 They used that govern- IN 1843, many of the Anglo-American farm families who immigrated to ment not only to validate and protect their own land claims, but also to ban the Oregon Country were animated by hopes of generous federal land the immigration of anyone of African ancestry.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Newspapers on Microfilm Alphabetical Listing by Town
    Oregon Newspapers on Microfilm Alphabetical Listing by Town This inventory comprises the Research Library’s holdings of Oregon newspapers on microfilm, arranged alphabetically by town. Please note that due to irregular filming schedules, there may be gaps in some of the more recent publications. ALBANY (Linn) The Albany Democrat (D) May 7, 1888‐Mar 31, 1894; Aug 3, 1898‐Aug 9, 1907; Nov 13, 1914‐Mar 1, 1925 Cabinet A, Drawer 1 Albany Democrat (W) Apr. 27, 1900‐Jan. 31, 1913 Cabinet A, Drawer 1 Albany Democrat‐Herald Mar. 2, 1925‐March 5, 1947 Cabinet A, Drawer 1 March 6, 1947‐June 1969 Cabinet A, Drawer 2 July 1969‐March 20, 1978 Cabinet A, Drawer 3 - 1 - March 21, 1978‐Jan. 13, 1989 Cabinet A, Drawer 4 Jan. 14, 1989‐Oct. 20, 1998 Cabinet A, Drawer 5 Oct. 20, 1998‐present Cabinet BB, Drawer 1 Albany Evening Democrat Dec. 6, 1875‐Mar. 11, 1876 Cabinet A, Drawer 1 Albany Evening Herald Oct. 19, 1910‐Apr. 5, 1912; July 28, 1920‐Feb. 28, 1925 Cabinet A, Drawer 5 The Albany Inquirer Sept. 27, 1862 Oregon Newspapers Suppressed During Civil War, Reel 1 Cabinet CC, Drawer 2 Albany Weekly Herald Feb. 26, 1909‐Sept. 22, 1910 Cabinet A, Drawer 5 Daily Albany Democrat Mar. 14, 1876‐ June 3, 1876 Cabinet A, Drawer 1 (same reel as Albany Evening Democrat) The Oregon Democrat Nov. 1, 1859‐Jan. 22, 1861; 1862‐64 [scattered dates] Cabinet A, Drawer 6 July 17, 1860‐May 8, 1864 Oregon Papers Suppressed During Civil War, Reel 1 Cabinet CC, Drawer 2 Oregon Good Templar July 21, 1870‐ June 26, 1872 Cabinet A, Drawer 6 - 2 - Oregon Populist Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Priorities Policy, Budget, and FY2011 Appropriations March 2010
    Federal Priorities Policy, Budget, and FY2011 Appropriations March 2010 Office of Public and Government Affairs UO ALUMNI BOARD OF DIRECTORS UO FOUNDATION BOARD The University of Oregon Alumni Association exists to foster The University of Oregon Foundation supports and assists the lifelong connections with the University of Oregon. The Alumni University of Oregon in its activities by management and ad- Association serves more than 155,000 alumni and friends, ministration of foundation assets representing privately donated including more than 18,000 members (with about 4,000 life funds, by leading advocacy for the university, and by develop- members). ing, financing, constructing, acquiring, and operating facilities for or on behalf of the university. Since 1922, the foundation Through the UO Alumni Association, alumni stay connected to has received, invested, and distributed private gifts that funded the university through Oregon Quarterly magazine, electronic student scholarships, faculty support, academic programs, and websites, newsletters and e-mails, campus events such as Home- building improvements. Distributions have always been made coming and class reunions, and watch parties, receptions, and according to the donors’ intention. Our goal has remained the signature events held throughout the U.S. and around the world. same from the beginning: to provide stable financial support Career services, mentoring, and travel programs are also avail- for the university while preserving the purchasing power of able to members. The board of directors is the governing body of endowment and trust funds in the future. The board of trustees the University of Oregon Alumni Association. It is composed of comprises as many as sixty-five members who donate consider- twenty-four geographically selected regional directors from Or- able time and effort in the interest of helping the foundation egon, four regional directors from areas outside the state, twelve and the university grow and prosper.
    [Show full text]
  • Sellwood Bridge Health Impact Assessment
    The Sellwood Bridge Project: A Health Impact Assessment Prepared by: Maya Bhat, Research Analyst Elizabeth Clapp , Research Analyst Health Assessment & Evaluation Office of Health & Social Justice January 21, 2011 Lillian Shirley, Director, Multnomah County Health Department Sandy Johnson, Director, Health & Social Justice For information please contact: Maya Bhat (503) 988-3663 ext. 29055 [email protected] Contents List of figures and table......................................................................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3 2 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................... 3 3 SCOPE OF THIS HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 3 4 PROJECT BACKGROUND 4.1 Existing conditions on the bridge ......................................................................................... 3 4.2 Locally preferred bridge design .................................................................................................... 4 5 ANALYSIS OF HEALTH IMPACTS OF THE REPLACEMENT BRIDGE 5.1 Improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety .............................................................................. 7 5.1.a Concerns about bike and pedestrian
    [Show full text]
  • Leave the House Alone
    SUNRISE MONDAY EDmO JANUARY 7. 2008 Qkegonian t. ______~~c=~~~c=~ --------_:~~~~~~~ PORTLAND, OREGON 3REAKING NEWS AT OAEGONLlYLCOM WINNER Of THE 2007 fUUTZE~ PRIZE FOR BREAKING NEWS •• EDITORIALS TH.EOREGONIAN. MONOAY,JANUARY7,2008 THE OPINION OF THE OREGONIAN EDITORIAL BOARD Leave the house alone n the gritty southem edge of the transit cleared, as Tri-Met acquired various properties even after a 2004 environmental impact statement mall, where Interstate 405 dumps com­ and tore them down to make way for the tracks. concluded that the transit work would have mini~ muters into downtown, stands a lonely The Figo House is so isolated by construction work mal impact on his property. At the same time, the O vestige of old Portland, the Figo House now, it's hard even to reach Acker's office. State Historic Preservation Office agreed that the (named after the owner's dog.) It is channing to think that, when the work is house shouldn't be disturbed by the transit project It's a well·kept example of the Victorian archi­ done, the Figo House would again be accessible without some undefined measures, such as reloca­ tecture that has almost vanished from the central and situated by a busy light-rail station and the tion, to mitigate the changes. But TriMel says sub­ city. Unlike the last few remaining old houses state's largest university. But, of course, the transit sequent revisions to the light-rail route have put downtown, ~uch as the lovely but vacant halianale agency doesn't sec il that way. II wants 10 strip the the Figo House in tht' way.
    [Show full text]