Community Advisory Committee Applications Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Community Advisory Committee Applications Report Community Advisory Committee Applications Report March 10, 2020 In the interest of transparency, this report includes verbatim application responses from Community Advisory Committee applicants received by the February 18, 2020 application deadline. 1 | March 10, 2020 Community Advisory Committee Applications Report Aaron Brown Interest: I am applying to represent an organizational interest Affiliation (if any): No More Freeways Organization represented (if any): Neighborhood interest: Primary interest: Urban design Secondary interest: Modes of transportation: Automobile Please tell us why you are interested in participating on this Community Advisory Committee. I am applying to sit on this Community Advisory Committee because, frankly, I'm morbidly curious to find out just how seriously ODOT is committed to public engagement, transparency, and community collaboration as the agency seeks to move forward on this billion dollar megaproject. I have spent approximately ten hours a week (and often times much, much more) for the past three and a half years tracking this proposed freeway expansion and supplementing ODOT's outreach to make sure local neighbors, climate justice advocates, parents and educational leaders, air quality and public health experts, and transportation activists were made aware of the exact discrepancies between the agency's flashy PR about the project and the decades of academic and empirical research. As one of the rabblerousers of No More Freeways, our organization has answered the calling to make sure that actual, independent community voices concerned about climate change, air pollution, traffic congestion, traffic safety, and bicycle/pedestrian/transit infrastructural improvements actually had a chance to proactively shape this mammoth infrastructure project that current and future generations of Oregonians will live with for the rest of their lives. I genuinely want to see progress on addressing the traffic congestion along the corridor (as a person who lives in North Portland and owns an automobile, I drive through the Rose Quarter quite frequently), investments that address air pollution, improve street connectivity, and address climate change. Considering that our tiny operation has managed to overwhelmingly shift the conversation about what sorts of massive investments are needed in this neighborhood to solve these problems, and considering my position as an undeniable community leader who is as responsible as anyone for a significant majority of the public comments ODOT received last spring, I'm applying to once again test whether ODOT can credibly claim to want public feedback on this proposal. Please list your experience trying to solve challenging issues in a group or committee process. Experience can be from your involvement in school, work, community organizations, faith based organizations, your neighborhood, etc. I bring to this committee a wellspring of experience sitting on boards, advisory committees, and occupying in positions in service to the community. I served as the Board President of Oregon Walks, the state's pedestrian advocacy organization for nearly four years. My tutelage included receipt of over $300,000 in new revenue through grants and membership gains, appointment of nine new Board Members and hiring of three staff, and spearheading the grassroots Portland campaign for Vision Zero to eliminate traffic fatalities. I'm especially proud of Oregon Walks' role 2 | March 10, 2020 Community Advisory Committee Applications Report in encouraging the Portland Bureau of Transportation to put in specific language opposing increased traffic enforcement; Portland was the first city in America to apply this particular equity analysis to their municipal Vision Zero initiative, and our organization uplifted the voices of numerous East Portland community partners we had cultivated relationships with to provide the political support to make it happen. I am fundamentally committed to collaborative, engaging work to explore how to make our transportation investments more equitable, more sustainable, and more collaborative, and more justice. I know that, if appointed, there will be many individuals on this committee with different opinions than mine about the efficacy and wisdom of many aspects of this proposal. I cherish the opportunity to meet community members face to face and discuss our shared dreams, desires, and outcomes for this project and find opportunities for collaboration. I have served on a litany of other advisory committees on transportation, including: 1000 Friends of Oregon: Land Use Leadership Initiative - Mentor, 2015-2016 Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability: Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee - Networks, 2013 Boise Neighborhood Association Communications Chair, 2011 - 2013 Portland Parks and Recreation: North Portland Greenway Project Advisory Committee - Member, 2012 Oregon Metro: Regional Active Transportation Plan - Youth Representative, 2012-2014 Please describe your community knowledge and expertise (if any) that you believe will help the committee with the substance of its work. As one of the chief organizers and rabblerousers of the No More Freeways Coalition, I helped spearhead an initiative that brought in approximately 85% of the 2000+ comments received by ODOT during the public comment period last spring. I worked with our traffic engineers and public records lawyers to uncover the full data sets originally missing from the 2019 Environmental Assessment, and I have years of experience of navigating existing ODOT's materials about this project and bringing them to the relevant community partners who are most likely to be impacted by ODOT's proposals. I probably know the ins and outs of the schematics, technical policies, nearby affected organizations and institutions, and wishes of the surrounding neighborhood as well as anyone not currently working on the project in a professional capacity. Whether or not ODOT is thrilled to admit it, the perspective and concerns that No More Freeways brings to this freeway expansion proposal has been validated by the numerous elected officials and variety of community organizations who have echoed our calls for further transparency and accountability with this project. It will be difficult for you to truthfully claim that this committee is representative of the concerns of the community if you do not include a single voice from the organization that has spearheaded over 80% of the comments received during the Environmental Assessment 45-day period last spring. No More Freeways has submitted countless letters to the Oregon Transportation Commission, ODOT, ODOT's Value Pricing Committee, Portland City Council, Metro, and others - many of these letters signed by hundreds of other community members throughout the city and region. If ODOT is sincerely interested in a good faith effort to address community concerns about this proposal, the agency simply must invite its loudest critics to participate on this committee. Aaron Levi Interest: I am applying to represent my own personal interest 3 | March 10, 2020 Community Advisory Committee Applications Report Affiliation (if any): Organization represented (if any): Neighborhood interest: Primary interest: Neighborhood connectivity Secondary interest: Black and African American communities and businesses Please tell us why you are interested in participating on this Community Advisory Committee. I have lived in the neighborhood for about 20 years and in my time here I have seen growth and economic development impede the connection this neighborhood has with itself; I have also witnessed longtime residents leave in droves due to affordability concerns and loss of this community feel. I am interested in participating to A) drive discussion in the interest of keeping and recommitting to this connection B) to drive the project in the direction to encourage longtime residents to stay and invest in the place as they had done for many years. I see this neighborhood as now having a very transitory population. What can we do to make this neighborhood a long-term residence for families, singles, alternatives, etc? What can this project do to encourage that? Please list your experience trying to solve challenging issues in a group or committee process. Experience can be from your involvement in school, work, community organizations, faith based organizations, your neighborhood, etc. I have been involved in many projects over the years that require collaboration from numerous stakeholder groups to ensure success. My experience is primarily in the complex and ever- changing landscape of commercial airline operations. The main lessons from this work from over a more than 20 year career, is the interaction of many systems/groups that can impact the final result. In my experience, a group that communicates freely, is led with some clear stated goals, and is willing to tackle serious issues in an open and respectful forum, is the most likely to succeed. I would bring this experience (albeit corporate) to this project. Please describe your community knowledge and expertise (if any) that you believe will help the committee with the substance of its work. My community knowledge and expertise is limited from a process standpoint, however I know my neighbors, I am familiar with the major issues in Boise-Elliott, and I have a desire to reside here and raise my children here. Adam Richard Kimbrough Interest: I am applying to represent my own personal interest Affiliation (if any): CBRE Organization
Recommended publications
  • PBOT's Strategic Plan
    1 MOVING TO OUR FUTURE 2019-2022 2019-2022 PBOT’s Strategic Plan Moving to Our Future Index Letter from the Commissioner and Director ................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 3 How we will use this plan ................................................................... 7 What PBOT stands for ........................................................................ 9 Transportation justice ...................................................................... 12 One bureau, one mission ................................................................ 18 Goal 1: Safety ..................................................................................... 21 Goal 2: Moving People and Goods.................................................. 27 Goal 3: Asset Management .............................................................. 33 Appendix ............................................................................................ 44 Saving Lives, Saving Time, Saving Money Dear Portlanders, When we ask you what your top issues are related to getting around Portland, three answers lead the pack: safety, congestion, and road maintenance. In a recent survey, nine out of 10 Portlanders cited these three issues as their top priorities. Given these concerns, we think you will be pleased with Moving to Our Future, the strategic plan that will guide our work at the Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT) for the next three years. It’s built around
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Chapter 8 Moving Forward Together
    PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Chapter 8 Moving Forward Together June 29, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose and background ................................................................................................................ 1 8.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 Connecting Our Shared Values and Vision for the Future: Setting a Course for Transportation 3 8.2 Planning and programs ......................................................................................................... 6 8.2.1 Local Implementation .................................................................................................... 6 8.2.2 Metro’s Regional Programs ............................................................................................ 7 8.2.2.1 Civil Rights and Environmental Justice program .................................................... 7 8.2.2.2 Regional Transportation Safety Program ............................................................... 8 8.2.2.3 Regional Active Transportation Program ............................................................... 9 8.2.2.4 Regional Freight Program ....................................................................................... 9 8.2.2.5 Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) Program ............... 9 8.2.2.6 Regional Travel Options (RTO) and Safe Routes to School Programs .................. 10 8.2.2.7 Air Quality and Climate
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit a History of Public Transit in Portland
    Hilary Pfeifer Meredith Dittmar PUBLIC TRANSIT A history of public transit in Portland Melody Owen Mark Richardson Smith Kristin Mitsu Shiga Chandra Bocci trimet.org/history Traveling through time Dear Reader, Transit plays a critical role in providing options for traveling throughout the region. It connects people to work, school, recreational destinations and essential services. It’s not just a commuter service. It’s a community asset. And the benefits extend far beyond those who ride. TriMet’s transit system is recognized as a national leader for its connection to land use. By linking land-use planning and transit, we have helped create livable communities, vibrant neighborhoods and provide alternatives to driving. Transit is also a catalyst for economic development. More than $10 billion in transit-oriented development has occurred within walking distance of MAX light rail stations since the decision to build in 1980. Developers like the permanence of rail when investing in projects. Transit is also valued by the community. Most of our riders— 81 percent—are choice riders. They have a car available or choose not to own one so they can ride TriMet. With more than 325,000 trips taken each weekday on our buses, MAX Light Rail and WES Commuter Rail, we eliminate 66 million annual car trips. That eases traffic congestion and helps keep our air clean. TriMet carries more people than any other U.S. transit system our size. Our many innovations have drawn the attention of government leaders, planners, transit providers and transit users from around the world. We didn’t start out that way.
    [Show full text]
  • Make a Plan to VOTE! Two Ways to Return Your Ballot: 1
    Make a Plan to VOTE! Two ways to return your ballot: 1. Vote early & return your ballot by mail. Get it in the mail by Tue., Oct. 27. No stamp needed! 2. Return to any Official Ballot Drop Site in Oregon by 8 PM Nov 3, 2020. Multnomah County Voters’ Pamphlet November 3, 2020 General Election Dear Multnomah County Voter: This Voters’ Pamphlet for the Nov. 3, 2020 General Election is being mailed to all residential households in Multnomah County. Due to the size of both the State and County Voters’ Pamphlet the pamphlets are being mailed separately. If you don’t have your State Voters’ Pamphlet yet, look for it in the mail soon. In advance of the election we are asking voters to Make a Plan to VOTE! Here is what you can do to be ready for the election and ensure your vote is counted: 1. Register to VOTE. Update your voter registration information or register to vote at oregonvotes.gov/myvote. The Voter Registration Deadline is Oct. 13. Sign up to Track Your Ballot at multco.us/trackyourballot. 2. Get your ballot. You will receive your ballot in the mail beginning Oct. 14. If you have not received your ballot by Oct. 22, take action and contact the elections office. 3. VOTE your ballot. Remember to sign your ballot return envelope. Your signature is your identification. If you forget to sign or your signature does not match we will contact you so you can take action and we can count your vote. 4. Return your ballot.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon's Recent Past
    Oregon’s Recent Past: North Willamette Valley, Portland, Columbia River, Mt. Hood. Written by RW. Faulkner Recent Photos by RW. Faulkner & MS. Faulkner ©= RW Faulkner 5/17/2018 All Rights Reserved First Printing August 2018 ISBN: 978-0-9983622-6-7 About the Cover Above Left Front Cover Above Right Back Cover Top Photo: Mt. Hood by FH Shogren, perhaps taken Top Photo: Clive E. Long, a Portland printer, near NW Thurman Street, Portland OR. Photo was & perhaps Clayton Van Riper of Dayton Ohio, featured in the 1905 Lewis & Clark Souvenir rest while climbing Mt. Hood, August 16, 1907. Program, (LC), titled, “Snow-Capped Mt. Hood, Seen Map: Copy of map of the northern Willamette Across The Exposition City,” & described by Rinaldo Valley. Original traced/drawn on tissue paper. M. Hall as, “Not every day may Mt. Hood be seen at It was used by pioneer Dr. Marcus Hudson its best, for clouds ever hover ‘round it, but the White to navigate, soon after his arrival in1891. constant watcher is frequently rewarded by seeing it (Found in a small notebook with most entries stand forth clearly & glisten in the sunlight as a dating 1892-1895, but map could be from mountain of silver. ...50 miles east of Portland by air 1891-1897.) line & 93 by shortest route, this favorite proudly rears its head 11,225 feet heavenward, thousands of feet above every neighboring object. It is one of the most notable peaks in the West, serving as a guide post to Lewis & Clark on their memorable trip of exploration to the coast in 1805-06, & later to the pioneers who hastened on to Western Oregon....” Lower Photo Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource. T Natural Ai Human M I I I.As Economic Public
    RESOURCE. T NATURAL AI HUMAN M I I_I.AS ECONOMIC PUBLIC APRIL 1974 EXTENSIONCwu&tD PROJ ECT EGON STATE UNIVERSITY Multnomah County, Oregon NATURAL RESOURCE HUMAN ATLAS ECONOMIC PUBLIC April 1974 Oregon State University Extension Service Prepared by Marilyn Ruttle, Research Assistant, Under the supervision of: Robert 0. Coppedge, Extension Economist, and Russel C. Youmans, Extension Resource Economist, Department of Agricultural Economics For sale by the Extension Business Office, Extension Hall, 118, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331. $2.50 per copy. Contents Page General Description 1 Physical Aspects 2 Climate Soils 5 9 Soil Characteristics and Land Capability. Land Use and Ownership 11 Agricultural Land 12 Forest Land 13 Water 16 Water-based Recreation 19 Minerals . 19 Wildlife 19 Human Resources 21 Population 21 Employment 24 Income 31 Education 33 Health and Vital Statistics 37 Public Welfare 43 Housing 45 The County's Economy 47 Agriculture 47 Logging and Wood Products 52 Manufacturing 54 Mining 55 Outdoor Recreation 56 Business 58 Public Services 63 Transportation 63 Communication 64 Library Facilities 67 Utilities 67 Public Finance 70 Selected List of Agencies 75 Selected Bibliography 77 MILES 0 5 10 15 20 £ MULTNOMAH COUNTY MULl NOMAH COUNTY £ MILES 5 10 15 20 (51 Bonnevi lie LEGEND PRIMARY HIGHWAYS SECONDARY HIGHWAYSC COUNTY ROADS INTERSTATE HIGHWAYSC GENERAL DESCRIPTION Multnomah County was established by the Territorial Legislature on December 22, 1854, seven years before statehood. The land included part of Washington and Clackamas Counties. Its entire population numbered 1,500 to 3,000 at that time. The county encompasses an area of 270,400 acres and ranks 36th among counties in area.
    [Show full text]
  • INFRASTRUCTURE CASE STUDY: Portland Airport MAX Red Line
    INFRASTRUCTURE CASE STUDY: Portland Airport MAX Red Line SUMMARY PROJECT TYPE YEAR DEAL STRUCTURE Light rail transit 2001 Design-build (plus transfer of development rights to public land) TOTAL COST $125.8 million construction cost FINANCING Private equity and TIF (Tax Increment Financing) FUNDING Airport passenger facility charge and TriMet general funds PUBLIC BENEFIT Connects downtown to the airport and encourages economic development of the Cascade Station area Background The Portland Airport MAX Red Line, located in Portland, Oregon, is a light rail line that connects downtown Portland to the Portland International Airport.1 It was financed and constructed through a private-public partnership (P3) agreement, and is operated by TriMet, Portland’s regional transit agency.2 It opened to the public in September 2001, and now provides more than 8 million trips per year, with 3,200 people getting on or off at the Portland Airport stop each weekday.3 Project Description The private-public partnership agreement for the Airport MAX Red Line came about through an unsolicited proposal from the private construction and engineering company Bechtel.4 Their proposal was $28.2 million in funding in return for sole rights to the $125 million design-build contract, and development rights for 85 years to 120 acres of land near the airport.5 This land would come to be known as Cascade Station. The original owner of the land was the Port of Portland, and the 120 acres were part of 458 acres earmarked for development as a mixed-use business park called the Portland International Center.6 TriMet’s unsolicited proposal policy allowed Bechtel to initiate the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Alerts – Digital Displays
    Service Alerts – Digital Displays TriMet has digital displays at most MAX Light Rail stations to provide real-time arrival information as well as service disruption/delay messaging. Some of the displays are flat screens as shown to the right. Others are reader boards. Due to space, the messages need to be as condensed as possible. While we regularly post the same alert at stations along a line, during the Rose Quarter MAX Improvements we provided more specific alerts by geographical locations and even individual stations. This was because the service plan, while best for the majority of riders, was complex and posed communications challenges. MAX Blue Line only displays MAX Blue Line disrupted and frequency reduced. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/Rose Quarter and Lloyd Center stations. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 1 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town MAX Blue/Red lines disrupted and frequency reduced. Red Line detoured. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 2 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town Direct shuttle buses running between Kenton/N Denver Station, being served by Red Line, and PDX. trimet.org/rq MAC Red and Yellow displays – N Albina to Expo Center Red, Yellow lines serving stations btwn Interstate/RQ and Expo Center. trimet.org/rq. Connect with PDX shuttle buses at Kenton. MAX Red display – Parkrose Red Line disrupted, this segment running btwn Gateway and PDX. Use Blue/Green btwn Lloyd Center and Gateway, shuttles btwn Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Central City 2035 Planning Team
    Volume 5A IMPLEMENTATION: PERFORMANCE TARGETS AND ACTION PLANS RESOLUTION NO. 37360 Effective July 9, 2018 Bureau of Planning and Sustainability Innovation. Collaboration. Practical Solutions. City of Portland, Oregon Ted Wheeler, Mayor • Susan Anderson, Director The Bureau of Planning and Sustainability is committed to providing equal access to information and hearings. If you need special accommodation, interpretation or translation, please call 503-823-7700, the TTY at 503-823-6868 or the Oregon Relay Service at 711 within 48 hours prior to the event. La Oficina de Planificación y Sostenibilidad se compromete a proporcionar un acceso equitativo a la información y audiencias. Si necesita acomodación especial, interpretación o traducción, por favor llame al 503-823-7700, al TTY al 503-823-6868 o al Servicio de Retransmisión de Oregon al 711 dentro de las 48 horas antes del evento. 规划和可持续发展管理局致力于提供获取信息和参加听证会的平等机遇。如果您需要特殊适应性服 务、口译或翻译服务,请在活动开始前48小时内致电:503-823-7700、TTY:503-823-6868 或联系俄勒 冈州中继服务:711。 Cục Quy Hoạch và Bền Vững (The Bureau of Planning and Sustainability) cam kết đem lại quyền tiếp cận thông tin và xét xử công bằng. Nếu quý vị cần nhà ở đặc biệt, dịch vụ thông dịch hoặc phiên dịch, vui lòng gọi số 503-823-7700, dịch vụ TTY theo số 503-823-6868 hoặc Dịch Vụ Tiếp Âm Oregon theo số 711 trong vòng 48 giờ trước khi diễn ra sự kiện. Управление планирования и устойчивого развития предоставляет равный доступ к информации и к проводимым слушаниям. Если Вам требуются особые условия или устный или письменный перевод, обращайтесь по номеру 503-823-7700, по телетайпу для слабослышащих 503-823-6868 или через Орегонскую службу связи Oregon Relay по номеру 711 за 48 часов до мероприятия.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    McCaleb, Iris From: Birdshill CPO/NA <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 2:15 PM To: McCaleb, Iris; Simpson, Anne-Marie; Council Distribution Cc: Rooney, Erica; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; OTC Admin; [email protected]; Runnion, Kelly; Birdshill CPO/NA; Lazenby, Scott; Randy Arthur; Bill Ward; [email protected]; LaMotte, John; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Wilson, Katie; Schmidt, Gary; [email protected]; CPO Summit; Siegel, Scot; [email protected]; millerthomas00 @comcast.net; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Donald Nash; Tom O'Connor (Uplands NA); Babs Hamachek (Lakewood NA); Carole Ockert; Jones, Carolyne; Cheryl Uchida; Chris Jacobson (Lake Forest NA); [email protected]; Craig Stephens; David Beckett; Dave Sengenberger; david roche; Diana Boom (Evergreen NA); Dwight Sangrey (Mt. Park); Ewa Campbell (Palisades NA); Fergus Nolan (Holly Orchard NA); Jan Castle; Jerry Nierengarten (Lake Grove NA); Jon Bell; [email protected]; [email protected]; Gary Stein; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
    [Show full text]
  • Stations Monitored
    Stations Monitored 10/01/2019 Format Call Letters Market Station Name Adult Contemporary WHBC-FM AKRON, OH MIX 94.1 Adult Contemporary WKDD-FM AKRON, OH 98.1 WKDD Adult Contemporary WRVE-FM ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY 99.5 THE RIVER Adult Contemporary WYJB-FM ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY B95.5 Adult Contemporary KDRF-FM ALBUQUERQUE, NM 103.3 eD FM Adult Contemporary KMGA-FM ALBUQUERQUE, NM 99.5 MAGIC FM Adult Contemporary KPEK-FM ALBUQUERQUE, NM 100.3 THE PEAK Adult Contemporary WLEV-FM ALLENTOWN-BETHLEHEM, PA 100.7 WLEV Adult Contemporary KMVN-FM ANCHORAGE, AK MOViN 105.7 Adult Contemporary KMXS-FM ANCHORAGE, AK MIX 103.1 Adult Contemporary WOXL-FS ASHEVILLE, NC MIX 96.5 Adult Contemporary WSB-FM ATLANTA, GA B98.5 Adult Contemporary WSTR-FM ATLANTA, GA STAR 94.1 Adult Contemporary WFPG-FM ATLANTIC CITY-CAPE MAY, NJ LITE ROCK 96.9 Adult Contemporary WSJO-FM ATLANTIC CITY-CAPE MAY, NJ SOJO 104.9 Adult Contemporary KAMX-FM AUSTIN, TX MIX 94.7 Adult Contemporary KBPA-FM AUSTIN, TX 103.5 BOB FM Adult Contemporary KKMJ-FM AUSTIN, TX MAJIC 95.5 Adult Contemporary WLIF-FM BALTIMORE, MD TODAY'S 101.9 Adult Contemporary WQSR-FM BALTIMORE, MD 102.7 JACK FM Adult Contemporary WWMX-FM BALTIMORE, MD MIX 106.5 Adult Contemporary KRVE-FM BATON ROUGE, LA 96.1 THE RIVER Adult Contemporary WMJY-FS BILOXI-GULFPORT-PASCAGOULA, MS MAGIC 93.7 Adult Contemporary WMJJ-FM BIRMINGHAM, AL MAGIC 96 Adult Contemporary KCIX-FM BOISE, ID MIX 106 Adult Contemporary KXLT-FM BOISE, ID LITE 107.9 Adult Contemporary WMJX-FM BOSTON, MA MAGIC 106.7 Adult Contemporary WWBX-FM
    [Show full text]