<<

09 –Core Concepts: Antibacterial Drugs II Speaker: Helen Boucher, MD

Disclosures of Financial Relationships with Relevant Commercial Interests

•Editor - ID Clinics of North America - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Core Concepts: Antibacterial Drugs II - Sanford Guide

• Treasurer, Infectious Diseases Society of America • Member, ID Board, American Board of Internal Medicine • Voting Member, Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Helen Boucher, MD, FACP, FIDSA Resistant (PACCARB) Professor of Medicine Tufts University School of Medicine

Overview of Antibacterial Mechanisms To Orient You: Little is Testable Active Agents

3 4

β-lactam Share Mechanism of β-lactam Spectrum Action

— Why are there different spectrum of activity for  Penicillins penicillins, cepahalosporins, carbapenems?  Semi-synthetic penicillins Gram-positive  1st gen cephalosporins Broad and narrow susceptibility to beta-  nd 2 gen cephalosporins lactamases  3rd gen cephalosporins Different binding proteins  4th gen cephalosporins Selective efflux pumps  Carbapenems Gram-negative Ability to reach target site 

5 6

©2021 Infectious Disease Board Review, LLC 09 –Core Concepts: Antibacterial Drugs II Speaker: Helen Boucher, MD

β-lactam Adverse Effects Penicillins Hidden-for reference only in syllabus  Anaphylaxis / allergy Rx Spectrum Additional — See lecture by Sandy Nelson Adverse  Seizures Events Penicillin Group A strep; Syphilis — , (oral/IV)  Myelosuppression, leukopenia, hemolytic anemia / (IV) MSSA AIN (oral) Amox and amp have similar spectrum and are both broader than penicillin  Hypersensitivity hepatitis: e.g. Oxacillin (IV) More active against H. flu, E. coli, , Listeria Amoxicillin clavulanate Broader spectrum than amox/amp due to addn of a beta-lactamase Delayed  Biliary stasis/sludging (oral) inhibitor; improved bioavilability (BID) Ampicillin Some activity against S. aureus; more active against H. flu and other gram (amox/clav) — (IV) negatives due to stability to some beta-lactamases NOT active against Pseudomonas  Renal Active against oral and gut anaerobes Broader than amp/sulbactam — Interstitial nephritis (IV) Active against gram positive organisms including streptococci Broad activity against gram negatives incl Pseudomonas

7 8

Question Cephalosporins  Bactericidal  What is the only active against — inhibit bacterial cell wall synthesis MRSA  Time dependent killing  Resistance due to susceptibility to β-lactamases  A)  Fewer allergic reactions than PCN  B) Cefapime  CSF penetration with third generation  C) Ceftaroline  Most renally excreted  D)  E) 9 10

Key Points About Cephalosporin Activity Cephalosporins

Rx Spectrum Additional Adverse Events  Enterococci 1st Gen Ceph Staph and strep • MSSA — None are active •Cephalexin Some gram negatives including E. coli, Klebsiella, Proteus although 1st  generation cephalosporins are very susceptible to beta-lactamases MRSA 2nd Gen Ceph Gram positive cocci • H. flu, E. coli, Klebsiella — Only ceftaroline active • Cephamycin – active vs anaerobes, in vitro vs ESBLs (no clinical data) rd  3 Gen Ceph Streptococci pneumoniae (excellent) Biliary sludge Anaerobic activity •Ceftriaxone Gram negative rods but NOT Pseudomonas Excellent CSF penetration — Only active Drug of choice for bacterial th  (e.g., cefoxitin, ) 4 Gen Ceph Broad gram positive and broad gram negative activity, including Pseudomonas Potential neurotoxicity, •Cefepime Often used as empiric therapy in hospitalized patients (however may need to especially in patients  Now high levels of resistance add vancomycin to treat MRSA) with renal failure 5th Gen Ceph Broader than amp/sulbactam; ceftriaxone-like •Ceftaroline Active against gram positive organisms including streptococci and broad activity against gram negatives not incl Pseudomonas 11 12

©2021 Infectious Disease Board Review, LLC 09 –Core Concepts: Antibacterial Drugs II Speaker: Helen Boucher, MD

Ceftaroline Fosamil – a Prodrug – a Prodrug (IV and IM, Not PO) (IV and IM, Not PO)

 Activity  Activity  Active vs Gram-negative pathogens  Gram-positive including MRSA and MDR S. pneumoniae  E. coli, Klebsiella spp., H. influenzae (incl B-lactamase positive), M. catarrhalis  Some activity vs E. faecalis; not E. faecium — Not Pseudomonas or ESBL+ GNB

 Limited activity vs. anaerobes — Spectrum similar to ceftriaxone  Active vs Cutibacterium (formerly Propionobacterim) acnes, Actinomyces spp.  Bactericidal, time dependent killing

Lodise & Low, Drugs, 2012; Saravolatz et al. CID 2011: 52: 1156 13 Lodise & Low, Drugs, 2012; Saravolatz et al. CID 2011: 52: 1156 14

Ceftaroline Ceftaroline Clinical Use Safety and Monitoring  Hypersensitivity 1-3%, rash 3%  Acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections  GI - nausea, vomiting, diarrhea 5%  Community Acquired Pneumonia  Hematologic toxicity (class effect) — Eosinophilia  S. aureus bloodstream infection — Positive Coomb’s test, rarely clinically significant — Controversial-see Chambers Lecture  Hepatotoxicity – LFT abn 1-7%  Controversy over dosing regimen  Nephrotoxicity rare — 600mg twice daily – FDA-approved regimen  Neurotoxicity – tremor, confusion, seizure, encephalopathy — Worse with renal failure

Lodise & Low, Drugs, 2012; Saravolatz et al. CID 2011: 52: 1156; File et al. CID 2010; 51: 1395; Zasowski et al, AAC 2017;61(2),e02015-16; Geriak et al. AAC 2019; 63(5); Kalil et al. AAC 2019; 63(11) 15 16

Vancomycin Vancomycin Resistance

 Bactericidal (slowly)  VISA — inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis  Active against: — Thick walls, generous binding sites…  — Gram Positive Aerobes Vancomycin resistance  Streptococcus — Not in Streptococcus  Staphyloccus — RARE in Staphylococcus  Enterococcus — Common in Enterococcus — Gram Positive Anaerobes  Rare in E. faecalis (4% in 2014)  Clostridia  Common in E. faecium (71% in 2014)  Propionibacteria  Mechanism  Peptostreptococci  Change in vancomycin binding site on  Actinomyces 17 18

©2021 Infectious Disease Board Review, LLC 09 –Core Concepts: Antibacterial Drugs II Speaker: Helen Boucher, MD

Vancomycin for MRSA Bloodstream Infection Vancomycin ADRs / Interactions  Controversy re: optimal therapy –see Dr. Chambers lecture Adverse Drug Reactions Drug Interactions  Vancomycin trough only monitoring no longer recommended  Nephrotoxicity  Increased nephrotoxicity when — Target AUC/MIC ratio of 400 to 600 BMD — Duration > 14d given with other nephrotoxins  (assume vancomycin MICBMD = 1 mg/L) — Dose > 4g / day — Aminoglycosides  Loading dose for seriously ill adults — Trough > 20 — NSAIDs — 20–35 mg/kg can be considered  Ototoxicity — Contrast — Pediatric doses higher  Histamine Release Syndrome — Cyclosporine — Tacrolimus  60-80 mg/kg/day divided q 6-8 hours — Loop Diuretics — ACE inhibitors Dosing Calculator helps!

https://www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/vancomycin/ 19 20

Daptomycin (IV) Daptomycin for S. aureus Bacteremia and Right IE

 Antimicrobial Class: Lipopeptide  Pneumonia — Do not use: surfactant binding inactivates drug  Broad spectrum gram + activity

— Including MRSA  Monitoring  Rapidly bactericidal — CPK twice weekly  Concentration-dependent killing — Discontinue if myopathy or CPK> 5x ULN  Indications  Toxicity — Eosinophilic Pneumonia — cSSSI  Rx supportive care and steroids — S. aureus bloodstream infection — Falsely prolonged Prothrombin Time — Right-sided endocarditis — Muscle inflammation  CPK increase, myopathy, myositis  Risk factors: renal failure, statins, obesity Fenton C et al. Drugs 2004; 64: 445-55, Tedesco KL, Rybak MJ. Pharmacother 2004; 24:41-57, Mangili A et al. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40:1058-60, Fowler VG et al. New Engl J Med 2006; 355:653-665 21 22

Oritavancin and Vancomycin and Daptomycin Long Acting Glycopeptides Drug MOA MOR Spectrum Adverse Event  Mechanism of Action Vancomycin Inhibits cell wall Change in cell Gram positive • Histamine — Similar to vancomycin synthesis (not a wall terminus cocci only release — Inhibition of cell wall synthesis beta lactam) from D-ala-D-ala including MRSA syndrome  to D-ala-D- • Kidney Dosing lactate (high level toxicity — : IV only: 1 dose (1200 mg over 3hours) resistance) — Dalbavancin: IV only: 1000mg, then 500mg every 7 days …..OR 1500mg x 1 Daptomycin Cell membrane • Decreased Resistant gram • Skeletal  Approved depolarization binding of positive cocci muscle drug to cell including MRSA toxicity — Skin and Soft Tissue Potassium efflux membrane and VRE — Oritavancin FDA warning against use in osteomyelitis • Altered cell membrane Inactivated by — Dalbavancin also used for osteomyelitis, right sided endocarditis potential surfactant (not  Toxicity used for — Oritavancin prolongs aPTT (artificially), PT, and activated whole blood pneumonia) clotting time (ACT) for 5 days 23 24

©2021 Infectious Disease Board Review, LLC 09 –Core Concepts: Antibacterial Drugs II Speaker: Helen Boucher, MD

Oritavancin - With Long Half-life Dalbavancin - Lipoglycopeptide With Long Half-life

 Mechanism of action  Gram-positive spectrum — inhibition of cell wall synthesis and disrupts bacterial membrane — Gram-positive spectrum — S. aureus, MRSA, VISA, GAS  S. aureus, MRSA, VISA, VRSA, GAS, S. anginosus group — Low MRSA MICs  E. faecalis , E. faecium/VRE (active vs VanA, VanB, Van C, Van D) — Enterococci – inactive vs VanA  Bactericidal  Mechanism of action – cell wall synthesis inhibit  IV only, 1 dose  Bactericidal — 1200 mg over 3 hours  IV only ( dose over 30 min), long half-life (app 8.5 days)  Cytochrome P450 – warfarin interaction  Dosing  FDA approved — 1000mg, then 500mg every 7 days OR 1500mg x 1 — ABSSSI — Decrease dose by 25% for CrCl <30ml/min, not dialysis  FDA approved ABSSSI

Dowell et al. Critical Care 2008, 12(Suppl 2):P26. www.fda.gov HF Chambers NEJM 2014; 370(23): 2238. WWW.FDA.GOV, Nailor and Sobel. Infect Dis Clin N Am 23(2009): 965. Jauregui et al. CID 2005; 41: 1407; Dunne et al CID 2016 Arias et al CID 2012: 54 (Suppl 3): S233; GR Corey et al. NEJM 2014; 370(23): 2180-2190 25 HW Boucher, M Wilcox, GH Talbot, S Puttagunta, AF Das, MW Dunne. NEJM 2014; 370(23): 2169 26

Lipo/glycopeptide Testable Toxicities Dalbavancin  Other uses  Vancomycin: Nephrotox.; Histamine Release — Limited data, varying dosing regimens  Daptomycin: CPK elevation, myopathy,  Endocarditis and osteomyelitis rhabdomyolysis; Eosinophilic pneumonia  Persons who inject drugs  : Nephrotoxicity  Case reports of failure with emergence of VISA,  Oritavancin: LFT elevation; False prolongation of presumably associated with low-level drug exposure aPTT — One patient had VISA detected in urine while on dalbavancin for CLASBI  Dalbavancin: LFT elevation — One patient was pregnant and had failure of therapy for IE

Steele JM et al. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2018;43:101-103. Werth BJ et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:429.e1-429.e5. 27 28

Question Antibiotics Active Intracellularly

 Which quinolone has activity against MRSA Fluoroquinolones Tetracyclines  A) Linezolid  B) TMP/SMX  C) Pleuromutilins  D)  E)

29 30

©2021 Infectious Disease Board Review, LLC 09 –Core Concepts: Antibacterial Drugs II Speaker: Helen Boucher, MD

Fluoroquinolones Fluoroquinolone Mechanism of Action Spectrum of Gram Positive Activity

inhibitors Gram-positive Gram-negative Anaerobes Cipro Poor strep Best FQ for Some — Inhibits DNA gyrase and II and IV Some MSSA •Pseudomonas — Gyrase more for gram negs, topos for gram pos •E coli  Resistance Levo Good strep Best for Stenotrophomas Some — Target site mutations Some MSSA — Drug permeability mutations

— Occurs spontaneously on therapy Moxi Good strep Not effective Best Good MSSA Don’t use for UTI

Dr. Gilbert will address Gram-negative activity 31 32

Fluoroquinolone Fluoroquinolone Adverse Effects

 High oral  C. difficile  Arthropathy/cartilage toxicity / tendonitis — >95% for moxi / levo, 70-80% for cipro — FDA Warning for rare tendon rupture  Widely distributed to tissues  Increased risk: advanced age, poor renal function, concomitant steroids — Lower than serum but therapeutic concentration in CSF,  Altered mental status (HA, dizziness, insomnia) saliva, bone, and ascitic fluid  Dysglycemia-FDA warning especially for older adults and diabetics  Elimination — Hypo and hyperglycemia  Aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection-FDA warning — Levo / cipro: renal through tubular secretion — Association is controversial — Moxi: >60% hepatic/ biliary unchanged  QTc Prolongation: Moxi > levo ? Cipro — Increased risk:  Concomitant QTc prolongers, cardiomyopathy, bradycardia, low K+ and Mg++ 33 34

Delafloxacin Tetracyclines: Major Clinical Uses

 Broad spectrum fluoroquinolone • Acne (minocycline) • Respiratory tract infections  Potential advantages: – Atypical pneumonia — MRSA activity • Sexually Transmitted Diseases — Broad spectrum including Pseudomonas – Syphilis (T. pallidum) –alternative therapy  Dosing IV and oral twice daily – Chlamydia spp.  Approved for skin and soft tissue infections • Tick‐Borne Illnesses – Lyme disease – Anaplasmosis – Ehrlichiosis – Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever • Community Acquired MRSA infections

Saravolatz LD and Stein GE. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(6):1058–62 35 36

©2021 Infectious Disease Board Review, LLC 09 –Core Concepts: Antibacterial Drugs II Speaker: Helen Boucher, MD

Tetracyclines: Adverse Effects New Tetracyclines  Gastrointestinal Omadacycline Eravacycline — Nausea FDA approval ABSSSI, CABP cIAI, not cUTI (failed studies) — Esophageal ulceration Dosing 200 mg loading dose over 60 min day 1, 1mg/kg IV q 12h (over 60 minutes) 100mg IV over 30 min or 300mg orally — Hepatotoxicity once daily  Skin No dose adjustment for renal/hepatic Dose adjustment with hepatic — Photosensitivity impairment impairment  Children Activity Broad spectrum: Gram-pos including MRSA, VRE;  Yellow brown tooth discoloration if age <8 yrs for tetracyclines Gram-neg including ESBL, CRE (not all); anaerobes  Doxycycline therapy OK for ≤21 days in children of all ages Issues Limited activity vs -resistant High MIC Pseudomonas, Burkholderia  Ref: Redbook 2018 and Am Academy Pediatrics K. pneumoniae spp.  Pregnancy Safety GI, rash, ?heart rate GI, rash — Tetracyclines cross the placenta; accumulate in fetal bone/teeth — Most tetracyclines contraindicated in pregnancy 37 38

Linezolid and Tedizolid Question Oxazolidinone Drug Class

 Mechanism  What is the major advantage of tedizolid — binds 50s ribosome/prevents formation of initiation complex compared to linezolid  Spectrum of activity — Gram positive cocci including MRSA and VRE  A) Longer half life  Linezolid resistant Staph aureus reported  B) Better penetration of prostate — Mycobacteria  Resistance is rare; target change  C) Better CSF Penetration  Linezolid bid; Tedizolid qd  D) Wide spectrum of activity against anaerobes  FDA approvals for Linezolid: — Skin and Soft Tissue, Pneumonia, VRE  E) More effective in clinical studies for VRE — NOT Bloodstream infection (Black Box Warning)

Shinabarger DL et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41: 2132-36; Swaney Sm et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42: 3251-55; 39 French G. Int J Clin Pract 2001; 55: 59-63 40

Tedizolid - Oxazolidinone Drug Class Linezolid Adverse Events Once Daily Dosing, Lower Dose  Non-antibiotic antibacterial; a MAO inhibitor  Adverse events related to mitochondrial toxicity: — Inhibits protein synthesis, bactreiostatic  Binds peptidyl transferase region of bacterial ribosome — Cytopenias prevents binding of amino acyl tRNA  Gram-positive spectrum  Monitor CBC — S. aureus, MRSA, VISA, GAS, S. agalactiae, S anginosus group, E. faecalis (vanco-susceptible only) — Peripheral and optic neuropathy  IV and oral — Rare:  Half-life 12 hours, once daily dosing  Lactic acidosis, serotonin syndrome (w SSRIs)  200 mg daily x 6 days  — No dose adjustment  mortality with catheter-associated bacteremia for age, renal/hepatic impairment  FDA approved ABSSSI  HABP/VABP Study Failed

Tsiodras S et al. Lancet 2001;358: 207-208; Pillai SK et al. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 186: 1603-7; Wilson P et al. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;51:186-88; Medwatch March 16, 2007 Moellering CID January 2014; www.fda.gov; Prokocimer et al. JAMA 2013; 41 Moran GJ, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:696-705; CID 2021 42

©2021 Infectious Disease Board Review, LLC 09 –Core Concepts: Antibacterial Drugs II Speaker: Helen Boucher, MD

Sulfonamides & TMP/SMX TMP/SMX Mechanism of Action

 st  Together inhibit folic acid synthesis 1 clinically used antibiotic: PABA + THA  — Identified as anti-streptococcal in 1932 — Competitively inhibit incorporation Dihydropteroate of para-amino benzoic acid (PABA) synthetase — Initially an industrial dye into tetrahydropteroic acid (THA) Dihydropteroic acid — Changed the face of WWII  SMX has higher affinity for THA Dihydrofolate than PABA does synthetase  Combined with 1968  Trimethoprim Dihydrofolic acid Dihydrofolate  — Inhibits dihydrofolate reductase Off-shoot: methotrexate (DFHR) reductase Tetrahydrofolic acid — Used for various hematologic, oncologic, and — 50,000 to 100,000 times more active against bacterial DFHR than human rheumatologic conditions enzyme Thymidine Methionine Purines 43 44

TMP/SMX Resistance Mechanisms TMP-SMX Adverse Effects

Sulfamethoxazole Trimethoprim • Anaphylaxis • Gastrointestinal effects  PABA overproduction  Novel plasmid-mediated DFHR • Skin rashes • “Nephrotoxicity” — Caution with OTC PABA  Altered cell permeability • Bone marrow toxicity • Fever supplements  Loss of binding capacity • Kernicterus • Drug-drug interactions  Structurally mutated  Overproduction of or alterations • Hemolysis (G6PD def) • Hyperkalemia dihydropteroate synthetase in dihydrofolate reductase  Decreased bacterial cell • Hepatitis permeability HIGH PLASMA COMPETES FOR PROTEIN BINDING TUBULAR SECRETION

45 46

TMP/SMX Spectrum of Activity - Typical Bugs TMP/SMX Spectrum of Activity - Odd Bugs

 Gram Positive  Stenotrophomonas maltophila — Staphylococci: great  Listeria monocytogenes — Streptococci: controversial  Nocardia — Enterococcus: not effective  Moraxella catarhallis  Gram Negative  Pneumocystis jirovecii — E. coli: ok, increasing resistance  Toxoplasmosis gondii (but not superior to pyr/sulf) — Enterobacterales: relatively effective  Chlamydia (but enough resistance that its not used for STDs) — Pseudomonas / Acinetobacter: not effective  Atypical mycobacteria — Stenotrophomonas: often drug of choice

47 48

©2021 Infectious Disease Board Review, LLC 09 –Core Concepts: Antibacterial Drugs II Speaker: Helen Boucher, MD

Macrolides (Erythro, Clarithro, Azithro) Lefamulin Protein Synthesis Inhibitor Binds 50s Ribosome

 Pleuromutilin antibiotic with IV and PO formulation Spectrum: — Protein synthesis inhibitor CABP Pathogens: Strep Pneumo Resistance — Bacteriostatic  Streptococcus pneumoniae  Rising rates in US  FDA Approved community acquired bacterial pneumonia  — Don’t use macrolides — Non-inferior to moxifloxacin for CABP in two studies  Moraxella catarrhalis if local rates of  5 days of po lefamulin vs. 7 days of po moxifloxacin  Leigonella spp. resistance > 25%  C. pneumoniae  Streptococcus groups A, C, and G

File CID 2019 49 50

Macrolide Spectrum Macrolide Adverse Drug Reactions STDs Miscellaneous Bugs  QTc Prolongation — Ery ≥ clarith > azith  Haemophilus ducreyi  Arcanobacter spp.  (chancroid)  Bartonella henselae (cat- GI intolerance: nausea, bloating, diarrhea  Chlamydia spp. scratch) — Ery >> clarith >> azith  Bordetella pertussis — Dose related GI pathogens  Atypical mycobacteria — Activity at motilin (peristalsis) receptors   Campylobacter spp. Borrelia burgdorferi — Rare cholestatic hepatitis   Helicobacter pylori Babesia microti  Pregnancy risk  Salmonella typhi  Shigella spp.

51 52

Clindamycin Adverse Events Clindamycin

 Mechanism of action  Allergic reactions: — Protein Synthesis Inhibitor — Rash, fever, erythema multiforme, anaphylaxis — Binds 50s Ribosome  Elevated AST/ALT — rare progression to severe liver injury  Diarrhea — can cause severe C. difficile toxin-mediated colitis  Reversible neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and eosinophilia  Taste disturbance

Sanford Guide, Brit J Clin Pharmacol 64:542, 2007; Clin Med Insights Case Rep 2019 Dec 25;12:1-4 53 Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 59:698-705J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jan 1;74(1):1-5 54

©2021 Infectious Disease Board Review, LLC 09 –Core Concepts: Antibacterial Drugs II Speaker: Helen Boucher, MD

Protein Synthesis Inhibitors - Summary

Drug Mech of Mech of Resist Spectrum Clinical Uses Major Adverse Effect Thank You! Action Linezolid 50s Mutation in ribosome Gram + (resistant) MRSA, VRE Pancytopenia  Henry Masur  Kenneth Lawrence Serotonin syndrome  Sue Cammarata  Evan Loh Tetracyclines 30s Target site modification Comm acq MRSA, atypical Lyme, RMSF, Enamel hypoplasia,   (Doxycyline) pneumonia pathogens, Comm Acq MRSA, photosensitivity G. Ralph Corey Paul McGovern Efflux Lyme, rickettsia and other acne, CABP Esophageal ulceration  Sara Cosgrove  Federico Perez tick borne pathogens, Treponema pallidum  Mike Dudley  Debra Poutsiaka Aminoglyco- 30s Inactivating GNRs serious gram Nephrotoxicity sides negative infx Oto-vestib toxicity  Mike Dunne  George H. Talbot Efflux  David Gilbert Ribosomal mutations  Susan Hadley Macrolides 50s Target site modification Gram + Atypical pneumonia, p450 drug interactions Atypical PNA pathogens resp infx GI upset  Teena Kohli Efflux QT prolongation Clindamycin 50s Target site modification Gram +, Anaerobes Oral and intra-abd C. difficile colitis  Our patients and their infx families Efflux

Inactivate drug 55 56

Questions, Comments?

 @hboucher3  [email protected][email protected]

57

©2021 Infectious Disease Board Review, LLC