Belarus in Maps.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Belarus in Maps.Indd 1. BELARUS IN EUROPE Geographic setting Belarus is a medium-sized European coun- try with an area of about 207,600 square kilo- The territory of the Republic of Belarus is situ- metres. Sverdlovsk Oblast (Russia), Kansas ated in the western part of Eastern Europe, be- (United States), the main island of Great Britain tween latitudes 51°16’N and 56°10’N and longi- and Hunan Province (China) are of similar size. tudes 23°11’E and 32°47’E (Figure 1.1). The length Belarus is slightly smaller than Laos, half the site of the country is 560 km from north to south and of Paraguay, and slightly smaller than Victoria 650 km from west to east. Geographic extreme (Australia). points are Lake Asvieja (Viciebsk voblasć) in the In terms of population, Belarus (9.5 million north, the town of Kamaryn (Homieĺ voblasć) in inhabitants, 2016) is in a group of middle-ranked the south, the town of Vysokae (Brest voblasć) European countries which includes Switzerland, in the west and the town of Chocimsk (Mahilioŭ Austria, Hungary and Sweden (Table 1.1). voblasć) in the east. Together with Azerbaijan, it ranks in the middle 17 18 Table 1.1 Belarus among 45 selected European and CIS countries Population number GDP, Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) Human Development Index (HDI) Per capita GDP, PPP Billion Current Thousand, Rank Country Rank Country dollar, Rank Country 2014 Rank Country international 2015 2015 dollar, 2015 1 Russia 143,457 1 Germany 3,841 1 Norway 0.944 1 Luxembourg 98,987 2 Germany 80,689 2 Russia 3,718 2 Switzerland 0.930 2 Norway 68,430 3 Turkey 78,666 3 United Kingdom 2,679 3 Denmark 0.923 3 Switzerland 58,551 4 United Kingdom 64,716 4 France 2,647 4 Netherlands 0.922 4 Ireland 55,533 5 France 64,395 5 Italy 2,171 5 Germany 0.916 5 Netherlands 49,166 6 Italy 59,798 6 Spain 1,615 6 Ireland 0.916 6 Sweden 47,922 7 Spain 46,122 7 Turkey 1,589 7 Sweden 0.907 7 Austria 47,250 8 Ukraine 44,824 8 Poland 1,005 8 United Kingdom 0.907 8 Germany 46,893 9 Poland 38,612 9 Netherlands 833 9 Iceland 0.899 9 Iceland 46,097 10 Romania 19,511 10 Belgium 494 10 Luxembourg 0.892 10 Denmark 45,709 11 Kazakhstan 17,625 11 Switzerland 482 11 Belgium 0.890 11 Belgium 43,585 12 Netherlands 16,925 12 Sweden 473 12 France 0.888 12 France 41,181 13 Belgium 11,299 13 Kazakhstan 429 13 Austria 0.885 13 United Kingdom 41,159 14 Greece 10,955 14 Romania 414 14 Finland 0.883 14 Finland 41,120 15 Czechia 10,543 15 Austria 404 15 Slovenia 0.88 15 Malta 36,005 16 Portugal 10,350 16 Norway 356 16 Spain 0.876 16 Italy 35,708 17 Hungary 9,855 17 Ukraine 339 17 Italy 0.873 17 Spain 34,819 18 Sweden 9,779 18 Czechia 332 18 Czechia 0.870 18 Cyprus 32,785 19 Azerbaijan 9,754 19 Portugal 290 19 Greece 0.865 19 Czechia 31,549 20 Belarus 9,496 20 Greece 286 20 Estonia 0.861 20 Slovenia 31,007 21 Serbia 8,851 21 Denmark 259 21 Cyprus 0.850 21 Slovakia 29,720 22 Austria 8,545 22 Hungary 258 22 Slovakia 0.844 22 Estonia 28,592 23 Switzerland 8,299 23 Ireland 257 23 Poland 0.843 23 Lithuania 28,359 24 Bulgaria 7,150 24 Finland 225 24 Lithuania 0.839 24 Portugal 27,835 25 Denmark 5,669 25 Azerbaijan 169 25 Malta 0.839 25 Poland 26,455 26 Finland 5,503 26 Belarus 168 26 Portugal 0.830 26 Greece 26,449 27 Slovakia 5,426 27 Slovakia 161 27 Hungary 0.828 27 Hungary 26,222 28 Norway 5,211 28 Bulgaria 137 28 Latvia 0.819 28 Russia 25,411 29 Ireland 4,688 29 Serbia 98 29 Croatia 0.818 29 Latvia 24,712 30 Croatia 4,240 30 Croatia 91 30 Montenegro 0.802 30 Kazakhstan 24,268 31 Moldova 4,069 31 Lithuania 82 31 Belarus 0.798 31 Croatia 21,581 32 Georgia 4,000 32 Slovenia 64 32 Russia 0.798 32 Romania 20,787 33 Bosnia-H 3,810 33 Luxembourg 56 33 Romania 0.793 33 Turkey 20,438 34 Armenia 3,018 34 Latvia 49 34 Kazakhstan 0.788 34 Bulgaria 19,097 35 Albania 2,897 35 Bosnia-H 41 35 Bulgaria 0.782 35 Azerbaijan 17,993 Table 1.1 continued Population number GDP, Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) Human Development Index (HDI) Per capita GDP, PPP Billion Current Thousand, Rank Country Rank Country dollar, Rank Country 2014 Rank Country international 2015 2015 dollar, 2015 36 Lithuania 2,878 36 Estonia 38 36 Serbia 0.771 36 Belarus 17,654 37 Macedonia 2,078 37 Georgia 36 37 Turkey 0.761 37 Montenegro 16,123 38 Slovenia 2,068 38 Albania 33 38 Georgia 0.754 38 Macedonia 14,009 39 Latvia 1,971 39 Macedonia 29 39 Azerbaijan 0.751 39 Serbia 13,671 40 Estonia 1,313 40 Cyprus 28 40 Macedonia 0.747 40 Albania 11,301 41 Cyprus 1,165 41 Armenia 25 41 Ukraine 0.747 41 Bosnia-H 10,492 42 Montenegro 626 42 Moldova 18 42 Albania 0.733 42 Georgia 9,630 43 Luxembourg 567 43 Malta 15 43 Armenia 0.733 43 Armenia 8,468 44 Malta 419 44 Iceland 15 44 Bosnia-H 0.733 44 Ukraine 7,971 45 Iceland 329 45 Montenegro 10 45 Moldova 0.693 45 Moldova 5,006 Sources: hdr.undp.org,data.worldbank.org, UN World Population Prospects (Nioman, and, in part, Dzvina, Dniapro). For For Dniapro). Dzvina, part, in and, (Nioman, Sea Black the or Sea Baltic the towards flow that rivers major of many area are thesource Plain try Belgorod, Voronezh,butnotMoscowOblast). Vladimir, (e.g. Tula, Federal District Central Russia’s densely populatedoblastsof the more of or one Africa South with Iran, grouped be on populationdensity,itcan or Bulgaria.Based thanthatofUkraine,Moldova States butlower er thanthat of the Baltic countriesorthe United high significantly is density population Its tries. highamongthepost-Soviet coun but relatively sons/km Australia. or population ofTaiwan or Zhengzhou).Thecountryhasbarelyhalfthe nor” Chineseurbanagglomeration(e.g.Harbin Georgia,NorthCarolina)orthatofa“mi Jersey, East CoaststateintheUnitedStates(e.g.New lation isaboutthesameasthatofamedium-sized popu Belarus’s countries. thepost-Soviet among of Eastern Europe. Almost thewholeterritory of EasternEurope. a majorpart which occupies graphical unit, alargephysicalgeo East EuropeanPlain, to itsadvantage. population. Belarusisseekingtoturnthisfactor basedonitseconomy,areaor might suppose one than country European important more Belarus its significance. Strategically, it is a far Europe. Itisthisstrategicpositionthatgives the country liesat ageopolitical focalpoint of doubt, a Without Russia. and EU the between route broughtdestruction. army Berlin-Warsaw-Minsk-Smolensk-Moscow EuropeandRussia / SovietUniononthe tween be a gateway role as theregion’s War), World during Napoleon (e.g. in otherperiods Lithuania). However, of tory formedthecoreareaofGrandDuchy Baltic andBlackseas,laterwhentheterri the between alongtherivers – whoadvanced Vikings –Swedish of theVarangians the time at instance, (for strengthened sometimes was role routes. Inthecourseofhistory,itsgateway transportcorridorsandtrade and east-west Belarus hasbeenameetingpointofnorth-south centuries, therefore,theterritoryofpresent-day , its ridges rising above the East European the East European , its ridgesrisingabove Although Belarusisa The Belarus lies in the western part of the partofthe lies inthewestern Belarus thegateway forms Belarus present, At 2 ) islowinEuropean(andglobal)terms population density population ’s campaign ofBelarus(46per landlocked coun and the Second andtheSecond 19 - - - - - - - - - of Belarus consists of different types of plains. 1795. These areas remained a part of the Russian After Denmark (and excluding Malta and the Empire until its collapse in 1917 (Figure 1.3). Vatican City), Belarus is Europe’s second “flat- Towards the end of the First World War, test” country. the independence of the Belarusian People’s The difference in elevation between the Republic (BPR, under German military occu- highest point (Dziaržynskaja, 345 m) and the pation) was declared (March 25, 1918). This lowest point (the Nioman Lowland, 78 m) is 267 occurred only weeks after the signing of the metres, which is less than the difference in eleva- Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (today Brest) (March 3, tion observed in the Baltic states (e.g. Lithuania, 1918), a peace treaty between Soviet Russia and 294 m) or in the Netherlands (329 m). Most of the Central Powers. The BPR had an area of Belarus’s terrain was formed by glaciers and sub- around 300,000 square kilometres. sequently altered by the post-glacial processes. After the withdrawal of German troops, Thus, despite the small difference in elevation, in early 1919 the Bolsheviks proclaimed (in the Belarusian landscape is gently undulating Smolensk) the Soviet Socialist Republic of with a remarkable diversity of natural condi- Belarus (SSRB), the territory of which was most- tions. The flat relief and the relatively fertile ly incorporated – in February 1919 – into the soils that overlay the moraine and fluvioglacial Soviet puppet state of the Lithuanian-Belarusian sediments provide favourable conditions for ag- Soviet Socialist Republic (Litbel), which existed riculture, forestry, industry, residential housing for about five months. and infrastructure development. As a consequence of the Peace of Riga (March 18, 1921), which concluded the Polish- Soviet war of 1919–1921, the western areas of State territory present-day Belarus were ceded to Poland. In the central areas, a new Soviet republic was es- The first states on the present-day territory of tablished: the Byelorussian (or Belarusian) Soviet Belarus arose between the 10th and 13th centuries Socialist Republic (BSSR) (Box 1.1).
Recommended publications
  • An Overview of Russian Foreign Policy
    02-4498-6 ch1.qxd 3/25/02 2:58 PM Page 7 1 AN OVERVIEW OF RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY Forging a New Foreign Policy Concept for Russia Russia’s entry into the new millennium was accompanied by qualitative changes in both domestic and foreign policy. After the stormy events of the early 1990s, the gradual process of consolidating society around a strengthened democratic gov- ernment took hold as people began to recognize this as a requirement if the ongoing political and socioeconomic transformation of the country was to be successful. The for- mation of a new Duma after the December 1999 parliamen- tary elections, and Vladimir Putin’s election as president of Russia in 2000, laid the groundwork for an extended period of political stability, which has allowed us to undertake the devel- opment of a long-term strategic development plan for the nation. Russia’s foreign policy course is an integral part of this strategic plan. President Putin himself has emphasized that “foreign policy is both an indicator and a determining factor for the condition of internal state affairs. Here we should have no illusions. The competence, skill, and effectiveness with 02-4498-6 ch1.qxd 3/25/02 2:58 PM Page 8 which we use our diplomatic resources determines not only the prestige of our country in the eyes of the world, but also the political and eco- nomic situation inside Russia itself.”1 Until recently, the view prevalent in our academic and mainstream press was that post-Soviet Russia had not yet fully charted its national course for development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Sarah from Ivatzevichi by Leonid Smilovitsky
    The Story of Sarah from Ivatzevichi by Leonid Smilovitsky Sarah Kopeliansky of Ivatzevichi was the lone member The Kopelianskys spoke Yiddish and Polish. Bentzion of her immediate family to survive World War II. This story subscribed to Hebrew periodicals from Palestine, including recreates her pre-war life, recounts her service with partisans the newspaper Davar. The journals and newspaper files were fighting the Germans, and her fate to the present. Ivatzevichi bound and shared with friends. Benzoin never returned from belonged to Poland when she was born but is now located in Warsaw without gifts. To his daughter he brought sweets; to Belarus. his wife cuts of cloth, woolen fabric, fur collars for vests and dresses, even silver buttons. From the history of the townlet According to the Lithuanian Record, the estate of Ivatzevichi was transferred in 1519 to Jewish merchants from Grodno.1 From 1654 Ivatzevichi was known as the estate of Yan Victorian, Judge of Slonim, Elder of Skidel and Mosty. For a century it was part of the Slonim District, Novohrudok Province, in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. It was annexed by the Russian Empire in 1795. Not far off was “Merechevshchina,” the ancestral estate of Kosciusko.2 During 1863-1864, Ivatzevichi constituted part of the area involved in the uprising of Kastus Kalinovski against the Tsar’s government.3 The laying of the railroad from Brest to Moscow began next to Ivatzevichi in 1871. A small settlement arose where people engaged in forestry, ran a small distillery, a brick factory, and a water mill. During World War I, Ivatzevichi was occupied by the German armies of Kaiser Wilhelm II, and in 1919-1920 by those of Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 3 February 2021 English
    United Nations ECE/TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/2021/11 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 3 February 2021 English Original: English, French and Russian Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee Working Party on Inland Water Transport Working Party on the Standardization of Technical and Safety Requirements in Inland Navigation Fifty-eighth session Geneva, 17–19 February 2021 Item 5 (b) of the provisional agenda Standardization of technical and safety requirements in inland navigation: Recommendations on Harmonized Europe-Wide Technical Requirements for Inland Navigation Vessels (resolution No. 61, revision 2) Proposals for amendments to appendix 1 of the annex to resolution No. 61, revision 2, “List of European inland waterways divided geographically into zones 1, 2 and 3” Transmitted by the Republic of Belarus*, ** Mandate 1. This document is submitted in line with the Proposed Programme Budget for 2021, part V, Regional cooperation for development, section 20, Economic Development in Europe. Programme 17, Economic Development in Europe (A/75/6 (Sect.20), para. 20.51). 2. The annex to the present document contains a proposal to revise the list of inland waterways of Belarus contained in appendix 1 of the annex to resolution No. 61, revision 2. The Working Party on the Standardization of Technical and Safety Requirements in Inland Navigation may wish to preliminarily approve this proposal and transmit it to the Working Party on Inland Water Transport for final adoption. * The present document was submitted after the deadline in order to reflect the most recent developments. ** The present document is being issued without formal editing. GE.21-01380(E) ECE/TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/2021/11 Annex Appendix 1, “List of European inland waterways divided geographically into zones 1, 2 and 3” (para.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Partnership Regional Transport Study
    Eastern Partnership regional transport study TRACECA IDEAJune II 2015 Annex II – Thematic maps P a g e | 1 Transport Dialogue and THIS PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE EU Networks Interoperability II Eastern Partnership regional transport study Final report Annex II – Thematic maps June 2015 This document is prepared by the IDEA II Project. The IDEA II Project is implemented by TRT Trasporti e Territorio in association with: Panteia Group, Dornier Consulting GmbH and Lutsk University Eastern Partnership regional transport study June 2015 Annex II – Thematic maps P a g e | 2 TABLE OF CONTENT 1 ANNEX II – THEMATIC MAPS ................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Rail maps................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Road maps ................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Maps for Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova ........................................................................ 6 1.2 Maps for Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan ................................................................... 7 Eastern Partnership regional transport study June 2015 Annex II – Thematic maps P a g e | 3 1 ANNEX II – THEMATIC MAPS In the context of this assignment, a GIS database to display the collected indicators of the EaP transport network has been completed. The GIS database is based on the shapefiles (GIS files) of the EaP road and rail transport networks received
    [Show full text]
  • Achievements and Difficulties in Bilateral Cooperation (1992–2017)
    UDC 327(476:474.5)"1992/2017" BELARus – LATvIA: AchIEvEmEnTs AnD DIffIcuLTIEs In BILATERAL cOOpERATIOn (1992–2017) V. G. ShADurski a aBelarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus The present article is devoted to the analysis of the Belarusian-Latvian relations during the period after the two countries gained independence. The author came to the conclusion that the main obstacle to expanding bilateral cooperation is the opposite of geopolitical aspirations of Minsk and Riga and, as a consequence, a different attitude of the neighbouring count- ries to the problem of human rights and historical policy. It is unlikely that the existing disagreements can be eliminated in the coming years. However, such advantages as the geographic proximity of the two countries, the cultural and histori­ cal proximity of the Belarusians and Latvians are a favourable factor for establishing effective interaction in the economic sphere, contacts at the level of regions and cities. A great capacity for cooperation exists in the Belarusian-Latvian border area. The article contains an attempt to define “points of growth” in bilateral relations, as well as to identify problems that can be eliminated without serious financial costs. Key words: Belarusian-Latvian relations; Belarusian and Latvian foreign policy; diaspora; Euroregions; twin cities; small border movement. образец цитирования: For citation: Шадурский В. Г. Беларусь – Латвия: достижения и про­ Shadurski V. G. Belarus – Latvia: achievements and difficul­ блемы двустороннего сотрудничества (1992–2017) // ties in bilateral cooperation (1992–2017). J. Belarus. State Журн. Белорус. гос. ун-та. Междунар. отношения. 2017. Univ. Int. Relat. 2017. No. 2. P. 3–12.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past: a Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region
    CBEES State of the Region Report 2020 Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region Published with support from the Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies (Östersjstiftelsen) Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region December 2020 Publisher Centre for Baltic and East European Studies, CBEES, Sdertrn University © CBEES, Sdertrn University and the authors Editor Ninna Mrner Editorial Board Joakim Ekman, Florence Frhlig, David Gaunt, Tora Lane, Per Anders Rudling, Irina Sandomirskaja Layout Lena Fredriksson, Serpentin Media Proofreading Bridget Schaefer, Semantix Print Elanders Sverige AB ISBN 978-91-85139-12-5 4 Contents 7 Preface. A New Annual CBEES Publication, Ulla Manns and Joakim Ekman 9 Introduction. Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past, David Gaunt and Tora Lane 15 Background. Eastern and Central Europe as a Region of Memory. Some Common Traits, Barbara Trnquist-Plewa ESSAYS 23 Victimhood and Building Identities on Past Suffering, Florence Frhlig 29 Image, Afterimage, Counter-Image: Communist Visuality without Communism, Irina Sandomirskaja 37 The Toxic Memory Politics in the Post-Soviet Caucasus, Thomas de Waal 45 The Flag Revolution. Understanding the Political Symbols of Belarus, Andrej Kotljarchuk 55 Institutes of Trauma Re-production in a Borderland: Poland, Ukraine, and Lithuania, Per Anders Rudling COUNTRY BY COUNTRY 69 Germany. The Multi-Level Governance of Memory as a Policy Field, Jenny Wstenberg 80 Lithuania. Fractured and Contested Memory Regimes, Violeta Davoliūtė 87 Belarus. The Politics of Memory in Belarus: Narratives and Institutions, Aliaksei Lastouski 94 Ukraine. Memory Nodes Loaded with Potential to Mobilize People, Yuliya Yurchuk 106 Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Lobach the Sacred Lakes of the Dvina Region (Northwest Belarus)
    THE SACRED LAKES OF THE DVINA REGION (NORTHWEST BELARUS) ULADZIMER LOBACH BALTICA 15 BALTICA Abstract The subject of research is the sacral geography of the Dvina region (in northwest Belarus), the sacred lakes situated in this region, and place-legends about vanished churches relating to these lakes. The author bases his research on the analytical method, and interprets folkloric sources, historical facts and data collected during ethnographic field trips. The main con- clusion of the article attests to the fact that place-legends about a vanished church (they relate to the majority of the lakes) ARCHAEOLOGIA indicate the sacrality of these bodies of water. In the past, sacrality might have contained two closely interrelated planes: an archaic one, which originated from pre-Christian times, and that of the Early Middle Ages, related to the baptism of the people of the Duchy of Polotsk. Key words: Belarusian Dvina region, sacral geography, sacred lakes, ancient religion, Christianisation, folklore. During ethnographic field trips organised by research- been found (four in the Homiel, and three in the Mahil- I ers from Polotsk University between 1995 and 2008, iou region). It should also be pointed out that the con- NATURAL HOLY a large amount of folklore data about lakes that still centration of lakes in the Dvina region (no more than PLACES IN ARCHAEOLOGY occupy a special place in the traditional vision of the 35 per cent of all the lakes in Belarus) is not as high AND world of the rural population was recorded. This means as is commonly supposed. Due to popular belief, the FOLKLORE IN THE BALTIC objects of ‘sacral geography’, which for the purposes region is often referred to as ‘the land of blue lakes’.
    [Show full text]
  • Report by Kube on the Extermination of Jews and the Fight Against the Partisans in Belorussia
    Report by Kube on the Extermination of Jews and the Fight Against the Partisans in Belorussia Minsk, July 31, 1942 The Generalkommissar for Belorussia Gauleiter / G 507/42 g To Reichskommissar for Ostland Gauleiter Hinrich Lohse Riga Secret Re: Combating Partisans and Aktion against Jews in the Generalbezirk of Belorussia In all the clashes with the partisans in Belorussia it has proved that Jewry, both in the formerly Polish, as well as in the formerly Soviet parts of the District General, is the main bearer of the partisan movement, together with the Polish resistance movement in the East and the Red Army from Moscow. In consequence, the treatment of Jewry in Belorussia is a matter of political importance owing to the danger to the entire economy. It must therefore be solved in accordance with political considerations and not merely economic needs. Following exhaustive discussions with the SS Brigadefuehrer Zenner and the exceedingly capable Leader of the SD, SS Obersturmbannfuehrer Dr. jur. Strauch, we have liquidated about 55,000 Jews in Belorussia in the past 10 weeks. In the area of Minsk county Jewry has been completely eliminated without any danger to the manpower requirements. In the predominantly Polish area of Lida, 16,000 Jews were liquidated, in Slonim, 8,000, etc. Owing to encroachment by the Army Rear Zone (Command), which has already been reported, there was interference with the preparations we had made for the liquidation of the Jews in Glebokie. Without contacting me, the Army Rear Zone Command liquidated 10,000 Jews, whose systematic elimination had in any case been planned by us.
    [Show full text]
  • Trianon 1920–2020 Some Aspects of the Hungarian Peace Treaty of 1920
    Trianon 1920–2020 Some Aspects of the Hungarian Peace Treaty of 1920 TRIANON 1920–2020 SOME ASPECTS OF THE HUNGARIAN PEACE TREATY OF 1920 Edited by Róbert Barta – Róbert Kerepeszki – Krzysztof Kania in co-operation with Ádám Novák Debrecen, 2021 Published by The Debreceni Universitas Nonprofit Közhasznú Kft. and the University of Debrecen, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Department of History Refereed by Levente Püski Proofs read by Máté Barta Desktop editing, layout and cover design by Zoltán Véber Járom Kulturális Egyesület A könyv megjelenését a Nemzeti Kulturális Alap támomgatta. The publish of the book is supported by The National Cultural Fund of Hungary ISBN 978-963-490-129-9 © University of Debrecen, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Department of History, 2021 © Debreceni Universitas Nonprofit Közhasznú Kft., 2021 © The Authors, 2021 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy- ing, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Publisher. Printed by Printart-Press Kft., Debrecen Managing Director: Balázs Szabó Cover design: A contemporary map of Europe after the Great War CONTENTS Foreword and Acknowledgements (RÓBERT BARTA) ..................................7 TRIANON AND THE POST WWI INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS MANFRED JATZLAUK, Deutschland und der Versailler Friedensvertrag von 1919 .......................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Novorossiya: a Launching Pad for Russian Nationalists
    Novorossiya: A Launching Pad for Russian Nationalists PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 357 September 2014 Marlene Laruelle The George Washington University The Ukraine crisis is a game changer for Russia’s domestic landscape. One of the most eloquent engines of this is the spread of the concept of “Novorossiya,” or New Russia. With origins dating from the second half of the 18th century, the term was revived during the Ukraine crisis and gained indirect official validation when Russian President Vladimir Putin used it during a call-in show in April 2014 to evoke the situation of the Russian-speaking population of Ukraine. It appeared again in May when the self- proclaimed Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics (DNR and LNR) decided to unite in a “Union of Novorossiya.” In August, a presidential statement was addressed to the “Insurgents of Novorossiya,” though the text itself referred only to “representatives of the Donbas.” The powerful pull of Novorossiya rests on its dual meaning in announcing the birth of a New Russia geographically and metaphorically. It is both a promised land to be added to Russia and an anticipation of Russia’s own transformation. As such, “Novorossiya” provides for an exceptional convergence of three underlying ideological paradigms that I briefly analyze here. “Red” Novorossiya The first ideological motif nurturing Novorossiya emphasizes Soviet memory. Novorossiya is both a spatial and ideological gift to Russia’s reassertion as a great power: it brings new territory and a new mission. This inspiration enjoys consensus among the Russian population and is widely shared by Russian nationalists and the Kremlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Battles and Campaigns in 13Th–19Th Centuries
    POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 Scientific editors: Ph. D. Grzegorz Jasiński, Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Reviewers: Ph. D. hab. Marek Dutkiewicz, Ph. D. hab. Halina Łach Scientific Council: Prof. Piotr Matusak – chairman Prof. Tadeusz Panecki – vice-chairman Prof. Adam Dobroński Ph. D. Janusz Gmitruk Prof. Danuta Kisielewicz Prof. Antoni Komorowski Col. Prof. Dariusz S. Kozerawski Prof. Mirosław Nagielski Prof. Zbigniew Pilarczyk Ph. D. hab. Dariusz Radziwiłłowicz Prof. Waldemar Rezmer Ph. D. hab. Aleksandra Skrabacz Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Prof. Lech Wyszczelski Sketch maps: Jan Rutkowski Design and layout: Janusz Świnarski Front cover: Battle against Theutonic Knights, XVI century drawing from Marcin Bielski’s Kronika Polski Translation: Summalinguæ © Copyright by Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita, 2016 © Copyright by Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości, 2016 ISBN 978-83-65409-12-6 Publisher: Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości Contents 7 Introduction Karol Olejnik 9 The Mongol Invasion of Poland in 1241 and the battle of Legnica Karol Olejnik 17 ‘The Great War’ of 1409–1410 and the Battle of Grunwald Zbigniew Grabowski 29 The Battle of Ukmergė, the 1st of September 1435 Marek Plewczyński 41 The
    [Show full text]
  • Filologia Mapy. Badanie Dawnej Kartografii Metodą Krytyki Tekstu Na
    TERMINUS t. 19 (2017), z. 1 (42), s. 193–252 doi: 10.4467/20843844TE.17.006.7895 www.ejournals.eu/Terminus Grzegorz Franczak Università degli Studi di Milano [email protected] Filologia mapy. Badanie dawnej kartografi i metodą krytyki tekstu na przykładzie toponimii mapy Księstwa Połockiego S. Pachołowieckiego z 1580 roku1 Abstract Th e Philology of a Map. Studying Old Cartography Using the Method of Textual Criticism: the Case of Toponymy of the Map of the Principality of Polotsk by S. Pachołowiecki from 1580 Th e aim of this paper is to make an experimental application of textual criticism (the stemma method or Lachmann’s method) in the analyses of early-modern maps. It is supposed to verify whether, and to what extent, the means developed by philologists to establish how texts were transmitted in medieval codices, can be applied to study the transmission of geographic knowledge on early-modern maps. Th e author postulates that well-tried procedures should be used in studies of textual parts of old maps. Th ey allow the formulation of fi liation hypotheses. Th ese procedures consist of collating extant texts and detecting mistakes that indicate, connect or divide individual branches of tradition. 1 Artykuł powstał w ramach projektu badawczego Narodowego Centrum Nauki Opus (nr 2014/15/B/HS2/01104) Związki literatury polskiej i kartografi i w XVI – I poł. XVII w. Terminus(1)2017-3-lam.indd 193 04.07.2019 11:49:41 194 Grzegorz Franczak Th e subject analysed is the toponymy appearing on the map Decriptio Duca- tus Polocensis (Th e Description of the Principality of Polotsk) by Stanisław Pachołowiecki, engraved in Rome by Giovanni Battista Cavalieri in 1580 and on maps stemming from the same archetype.
    [Show full text]