DOCSLIB.ORG

Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Board

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Board CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Wednesday February 12, 2020 A simultaneous conference call will take place at: 10 a.m. Placer County Transportation Santa Clara Valley Transportation City Council Chambers Planning Agency (PCTPA) Agency (VTA) Suisun City Hall 299 Nevada Street, Auburn 3331 North First Street, San Jose 701 Civic Center Blvd. ------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------- City of Suisun City, CA San Francisco Bicycle Coalition Yolo County Board of Supervisors (see attached map) 1720 Market Street, San Francisco 600 A Street, Suite B, Davis AGENDA I. Call to Order II. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance III. Report of the Chair IV. Consent Calendar Action 1. Minutes of the November 20, 2019 Meeting 2. FY19/20 Wi-Fi: Budget Update 3. On-Call Consultant Services 4. Service Optimization, Phase 2 – Operations Study: Budget Update 5. Reprogram Prop 1A Funds from Travel Time Savings to Santa Clara Siding 6. Authorize “MobilityData IO” to Develop Open Source GTFS Software under the Cal-ITP FY 18 TIRCP Grant V. Action and Discussion Items 1. Annual Business Plan (FY 2020-21 – FY 2021-22) Action* 2. Legislative Matters/Governor’s Draft FY 20-21 Budget Action 3. Bay Bridge Bus-Only Lane Action 4. Hercules Station – Candidate Station Action 5. South Bay Connect: Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement with AC Transit & MTC/BATA Info 6. Capital Projects Update – Alviso Wetlands Railroad Adaptation Alternatives Study Info 7. Managing Director’s Report Info 8. Work Completed Info a. Capitol Corridor Annual Performance Report (FY 2019) b. CCJPA Annual Independent Audit (FY 2019) c. FY 2020 CCJPA Amtrak Operating Agreement d. BART – CCJPA Administrative Services Agreement e. Marketing Activities (November 2019 – January 2020) 9. Work in Progress Info a. Onboard Wi-Fi Upgrade b. AC Transit Service – Emeryville to San Francisco c. California Passenger Information Display System (CalPIDS) Modernization d. South Bay Connect e. Sacramento to Roseville Third Mainline Track, Phase I f. Renewable Diesel Pilot Program, Phase II g. Procurement of Door Panels for NorCal Surfliner Rail Cars h. Santa Clara Siding i. Upcoming Marketing and Communications Activities VI. Board Director Reports VII. Public Comment VIII. Adjournment. Next Meeting Date: 10:00 a.m., April 15, 2020 at City Council Chambers, Martinez, CA Members of the public may address the Board regarding any item on this agenda. Please complete a "Request to Address the Board" form (available at the entrance of the Boardroom and at a teleconference location, if applicable) and hand it to the Secretary or designated staff member before the item is considered by the Board. If you wish to discuss a matter that is not on the agenda during a regular meeting, you may do so under Public Comment. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes for any item or matter. The CCJPA Board reserves the right to take action on any agenda item. Consent calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved or adopted by one motion unless a request for discussion or explanation is received from a CCJPA Board Director or from a member of the audience. * Approval of the business plan requires an affirmative vote of at least two-thirds (11) of the appointed members. The CCJPA Board provides services/accommodations upon request to persons with disabilities who wish to address Board matters. Requests must be made within one and five days in advance of Board meetings, depending on the service requested. Call (510) 464-6085 for information. DIRECTIONS TO SUISUN CITY HALL Item IV.1 (Consent) CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY Regular Board Meeting Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority Board of Directors Minutes of the 115th Meeting November 20, 2019 The 115th meeting of the Board of Directors of the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CCJPA) was held at 10:30 a.m., Wednesday, November 20, 2019, via simultaneous teleconference at Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, 3331 North First Street, Room B-106, San Jose, California; Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, 299 Nevada Street, Auburn, California; City of Citrus Heights, 6360 Fountain Square Drive, Lobby Conference Room A, Citrus Heights, California; 6000 Heritage Trail, Clayton, California; 3500 Larchmont Drive, Fairfield, California; and Bay Area Metro Center, Angel Island Conference Room 8338, 375 Beale Street, San Francisco, California. Vice Chair Saylor presided; Patricia K. Williams, Recording Secretary. I. Call to Order. Vice Chair Saylor called the meeting to order at 10:30 a.m. Vice Chair Saylor introduced Ms. Nuria Fernandez, General Manager/Chief Executive Officer of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (SCVTA) and Ms. Fernandez addressed the Board. II. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance. Directors present in San Jose: Don Saylor, Yolo County Transportation District (YCTD); Jim Holmes, Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA); John McPartland, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART); Teresa O’Neill, SCVTA; Raul Peralez, SCVTA; Robert Raburn, BART. Director present in Auburn: John Allard, PCTPA. Director present in Citrus Heights: Steve Miller, Sacramento Regional Transit District (SRTD). Director present in Clayton: Debora Allen, BART. Director present in Fairfield: Harry Price, Solano Transportation Authority (STA). Director present in San Francisco: Jim Spering, STA. Absent: Directors Bevan Dufty, BART; Lucas Frerichs, YCTD; Janice Li, BART; Rebecca Saltzman, BART; and Kerri Howell, SRTD. III. Report of the Chair. Vice Chair Saylor provided the Report of the Chair and highlighted agenda items, including the Annual Performance Report for the Fiscal Year (FY) that ended on September 30, 2019; the managing agency recommendation from the Ad Hoc Subcommittee; the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) application; and the Sacramento Gateway Plan. Vice Chair Saylor called for a moment of reflection for Leonardo Shiyanga-Omani, who was fatally struck by a National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) train. Roland LeBrun addressed the Board. IV. Consent Calendar. Director Raburn moved adoption of Item IV.1, Minutes of the September 18, 2019 Meeting; Item IV.2, 2020 CCJPA Board of Directors Meeting Schedule; Item IV.3, Resolution No. 19-24, In the Matter of Approving the Agreement for the Provision of Rail Passenger Service (“FY 2020 Operating Agreement”) between the National Railroad Passenger Corporation and the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority; IV.4, Resolution No. 19-25, In the Matter of Authorizing a Budget for the Diesel Exhaust Fluid Storage and Dispensing System for the Oakland Maintenance Facility; and Item IV.5, Resolution No. 19-26, In the Matter of Authorizing a Revised Budget for the California Passenger Information Display System (PIDS) Modernization Project. Director Peralez seconded the motions. The motions carried by unanimous roll call vote. Ayes: 10 – Directors Saylor, Allard, Holmes, McPartland, Miller, O’Neill, Peralez, Price, Raburn, and Spering. Noes: 0. Absent: 6 – Directors Allen, Dufty, Frerichs, Li, Saltzman, and Howell. V. Action and Discussion Items. 1. Capitol Corridor Annual Performance Report (FY 19). Ms. Priscilla Kalugdan, Manager of Capitol Corridor Marketing/Communications, presented the item, highlighting that the CCJPA would continue to focus on data and infographics based on positive responses from the past two annual performance reports; the content of the data and infographics; and the contents of the proposed 2019 Annual Performance Report. The item was discussed. Director Raburn moved adoption of Resolution No. 19-27, In the Matter of Approving the Capitol Corridor Annual Performance Report (FY 2019). Director O’Neill seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous roll call vote. Ayes: 11 – Directors Saylor, Allard, Allen, Holmes, McPartland, Miller, O’Neill, Peralez, Price, Raburn, and Spering. Noes: 0. Absent: 5 – Directors Dufty, Frerichs, Li, Saltzman, and Howell. 2. CCJPA Managing Agency Selection. Mr. Robert Padgette, Managing Director, presented the item, highlighting the legislative authority for the establishment of the CCJPA; history of the CCJPA’s development and management of CCJPA service; history of BART’s selection as the CCJPA’s managing agency and the CCJPA’s Administrative Agreement with BART; and the CCJPA’s current Administrative Agreement with BART. Vice Chair Saylor commented on the Ad Hoc Subcommittee’s meeting; thanked the Subcommittee participants and Mr. Mike Luken, Executive Director of the PCTPA, for their efforts; and reported on the following recommendations from the Subcommittee for the Administrative Agreement: (1) language in the scope of work to include customer service improvement plans as a regularly updated item for the CCJPA Board; and (2) language referring to consultation with the CCJPA Board when selecting the CCJPA Managing Director or an equivalent role in the future. The item was discussed. Mike Barnbaum addressed the Board. Director Holmes moved adoption of Resolution No. 19-28, In the Matter of Extending the Administrative Services Agreement between the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority and the Managing Agency for Five Years (February 2020-February 2025). Director Spering seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous roll call vote. Ayes: 11 – Directors Saylor, Allard, Allen, Holmes, McPartland, Miller, O’Neill, Peralez, Price, Raburn, and Spering. Noes: 0. Absent: 5 – Directors Dufty,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To: Ashley Nguyen, Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Commission Dear Ms
    From: Terry Abrams Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 5:05 PM To: MTC Info Subject: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project To: Ashley Nguyen, Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Commission Dear Ms. Nguyen and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, I am writing in support of adding the Richmond‐San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project to Plan Bay Area and to the 2015 Transportation Improvement Program. By prioritizing the re‐opening of the third lane on the Richmond‐San Rafael Bridge during peak evening commute hours, we will make a big difference in cutting traffic, reducing air pollution, and improving the quality of life in the North Bay. Thank you. Terry L. Abrams ABRAMS CONSULTING Management Consultants www.abramsconsulting.net 1 From: Jeff Alpert Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:14 PM To: MTC Info Subject: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project To: Ashley Nguyen, Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Commission Dear Ms. Nguyen and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, I am writing in support of adding the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project to Plan Bay Area and to the 2015 Transportation Improvement Program. By prioritizing the re-opening of the third lane on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge during peak evening commute hours, we will make a big difference in cutting traffic, reducing air pollution, and improving the quality of life in the North Bay. Thank you. Jeffrey D.Alpert Managing Partner Milestone Trailer Leasing LLC Ph Cell 1 From: Shannon Appelcline Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 11:57 AM To: MTC Info Cc: Subject: Support for Richmond/San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project I am writing to express my strong support for a bike lane across the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Corridor Service Performance
    CAPITOL CORRIDOR SERVICE PERFORMANCE In July 2016, the Capitol Corridor had one of its best months in the history of the service. Ridership was the highest ever, with a total of 128,655 passengers, a 1.7% year‐over‐year (YOY) increase. Revenue was up 4.6% compared to July 2015. Compared to June 2016, On‐ Time Performance (OTP) slipped slightly from 96% to 95%, yet was still above the FY16 standard of 90%. The Year‐To‐Date (YTD) results continue to be in positive territory. Compared to FY15, FYTD16 ridership and revenue are up 5.5%, with the System Operating Ratio at 55%, five percentage points above the 50% standard. YTD OTP is 94%, which keeps the Capitol Corridor in the #1 spot for service reliability in the national Amtrak intercity passenger rail network. The FYTD16 customer satisfaction scores (through June 2016) are at 89% “Highly Satisfied”, one point above the FY16 standard of 88%. The following are ridership highlights for July 2016: Average weekend ridership for July was down 7% versus July 2015. To address these continued decreases in weekend ridership, the CCJPA is modifying the weekend/holiday train schedule effective August 22, 2016, to slot trains at times that align with typical weekend travel patterns. Average July weekday ridership yielded a 9% increase thanks to continued growth on the trains serving San Jose/Silicon Valley and Placer County stations. Amtrak has sent detailed performance results (see attached) for June 2016 and provided below is a summary of the attached tables: OTP: June 2016 system end‐point OTP was a stellar 96% compared to 93% for May 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Surfliner-San Luis Obispo-San Diego-October282019
    PACIFIC SURFLINER® PACIFIC SURFLINER® SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO Effective October 28, 2019 Effective October 28, 2019 ® ® SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA VENTURA - LOS ANGELES VENTURA - LOS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO and intermediate stations and intermediate stations Including Including CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES connecting connecting NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Amtrak.com Amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. page 2 PACIFIC SURFLINER - Southbound Train Number u 5804 5818 562 1564 564 1566 566 768 572 1572 774 Normal Days of Operation u Daily Daily Daily SaSuHo Mo-Fr SaSuHo Mo-Fr Daily Mo-Fr SaSuHo Daily 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Also Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Not Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y On Board Service u låO låO låO låO låO l å O l å O l å O l å O Mile Symbol q SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA –Cal Poly 0 >v Dp b3 45A –Amtrak Station mC ∑w- b4 00A l6 55A Grover Beach, CA 12 >w- b4 25A 7 15A Santa Maria, CA–IHOP® 24 >w b4 40A Guadalupe-Santa Maria, CA 25 >w- 7 31A Lompoc-Surf Station, CA 51 > 8 05A Lompoc, CA–Visitors Center 67 >w Solvang, CA 68 >w b5 15A Buellton, CA–Opp.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Transportation Programming Statute Book
    Statutes Related to Programming and Funding of Transportation Projects State of California Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Programming March 2004 PREFACE STATUTES BOOK This book is a collection of statutes related to programming and funding of transportation projects. It is an auxiliary tool that is meant to provide easy access to current, relevant statutes. The 2004 edition of the Statutes Book incorporates all relevant legislation passed and signed into law up to January 1, 2004. All bills, with the exception of bills that are urgency statutes, become effective January 1st of the year following the end of the session. All bills passed in the 2003 legislative session become effective January 1, 2004. Bills that are urgency statutes become effective immediately upon signing into law by the Governor. At the end of certain sections of the book, you will find a row of asterisks. These asterisks indicate there is additional legislation in this chapter, however, it was omitted as it did not pertain to programming or funding. CALIFORNIA CODES California Law consists of 29 codes which cover the State Constitution and the California Statutes. As defined, California Statutes are bills that have been chaptered by the Secretary of State after the bill has passed through the Assembly and Senate and subsequently signed by the Governor, or becomes law without the Governor’s signature. INTERNET ACCESS The Programming Statutes Book is accessible on the internet at the following address: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/reports.htm The Legislative Counsel of California is required by law to maintain the World Wide Web (www) site where the complete California Codes are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Options for a Bay Area Transportation Network Manager
    Governing Transit Seamlessly: Options for a Bay Area Transportation Network Manager A report by Seamless Bay Area April 2021 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Poor Outcomes, Root Causes, and Solutions 11 Poor outcomes 11 Root causes 13 Solutions 16 Increased investment 16 Transit-supportive land uses 16 Reformed transportation institutions 16 Chapter 3: Network Manager Key Considerations & Conceptual Models 18 Functions a network manager should oversee 18 Conceptual models of network management 19 Geographical coverage considerations 20 Governing board considerations 21 Approach to geographical representation on boards 22 Relationship to existing institutions 24 Chapter 4: Network Manager Alternative Options 26 Option A: Altered MTC Network Manager 27 Option B: Regional Transit Agency Network Manager 31 Option C: Universal Transit Agency Network Manager 38 Option D: Enhanced Executive Board 43 Chapter 5: Evaluation 46 Chapter 6: Conclusions & Next Steps 49 Conclusions 49 Next Steps 51 Acknowledgments 53 Seamless Bay Area Board 53 2 Executive Summary “If you want to get people to do something, make it easy,” Nobel-prize winning behavioral economist Richard Thaler oen says. “Remove the obstacles." Seamless transit is about making transit easy so more people use it - giving people from all backgrounds true freedom of movement to live their fullest lives. It’s the reason why Principle #1 in the Seamless Transit Principles, endorsed by dozens of organizations and cities, is Run all Bay Area transit as one easy-to-use system. Easy-to-use transit isn’t a luxury that only matters to some people - transit that is easy is fundamentally also accessible, usable, and equitable.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Report FY19 Rider Profile CAPITOL Corridorticket JOINT Type POWERS AUTHORITY WORK/ BUSINESS 67%
    Performance Report FY19 Rider Profile CAPITOL CORRIDORTicket JOINT Type POWERS AUTHORITY WORK/ BUSINESS 67% Ticket WithWelcome FY2019, the Capitol Corridor Aboard! celebrated five straight years of Type record-breaking ridership and revenue, with a new all-time high of 10-RIDE 1,777,136 riders and $38.03 million in revenue. ThisWORK/ growth is reflected 18% FAMILY/ BUSINESS OTHER 1% 67% REC/in the FareboxFRIENDS Ratio, which reached a previously unattained 60%. SCHOOL 3% LEISURE 15% 12% ROUND-TRIP/ To build upon this success, and to ensure the Capitol Corridor’s place as ONE-WAY a premier travel choice, the CCJPA is making progress on infrastructure 50% improvements, safety upgrades, customer service enhancements, MONTHLY and service expansion projects. These efforts aim to maintain Capitol 32% Corridor as a quality, convenient,OTHER 1% cost-effective, and flexibleFAMILY/ option for REC/ FRIENDS years to come. SCHOOL 3% LEISURE 15% Rider Profile Ticket Type 12% SHOP/VACATION 2% WORK/ BUSINESS 21 Years of Improvement* 67% SERVICE REVENUE-TO- LEVEL RIDERSHIP REVENUE COST RATIO +275% +284% +508% +100% Rider Customer Satisfaction Profile 10-RIDE WORK/ 18% FAMILY/ BUSINESS OTHER 1% 67% FY 2019 FY 2019 FY 2019 REC/ FYFRIENDS 2019 30 DAILY 1,777,136SCHOOL 3% $38.03MLEISURE 60%15% TRAINS 12% ROUND-TRIP/ ONE-WAY 50% MONTHLY 90% 87% 90% 91% 89% 89% 87% 89% 88% 85% 90% 32% OTHER 1% FAMILY/ FY 1998 REC/ FRIENDS 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 SCHOOL 3% 2018 2019 (PRE-CCJPA) FY 1998 FY 1998 FY 1998 LEISURE 15% 8 DAILY (PRE-CCJPA) (PRE-CCJPA) (PRE-CCJPA) SHOP/VACATION 2% 12% TRAINS 463,000 $6.25M 30% *CCJPA assumed management of the service in 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Corridor Performance Report
    Capito l Co rr idor Performance Rep ort THE CAPITO L CORRIDO R JOIN T POWER S AUTHORITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fiscal Year 2009 was a year of mixed results for the Capitol Corridor. The challenging economic climate affected all sectors of the travel and transportation industry, including intercity passenger rail. Although our performance in FY 2009 was not as strong as FY 2008 – when high gas prices and a stronger economy drove record ridership – we continued the positive growth trend from FY 2007 and years past, and reinforced our record of prudently managing public funds to deliver a high- quality passenger rail service. In FY 2009: • Overall ridership fell 5.5%, revenue was flat, and our revenue-to-cost ratio fell to 47% primarily due to increased labor expenses and revenues that were below projections. • On-time performance reached an all-time high of 93% thanks to our capitalized maintenance program (now unfunded) and improved Union Pacific Railroad dispatching. This makes the Capitol Corridor the most reliable multi-frequency train service in the Amtrak national system. • Customer satisfaction scores continued to improve, despite poor economic conditions and extensive job losses. Over the past 11 years under CCJPA management, the Capitol Corridor’s service frequency has quadrupled, ridership and revenue have more than tripled, and our revenue-to-cost ratio improved by 56%. The CCJPA achieved these gains with very modest increases in State subsidy by constantly improving efficiency and reinvesting cost savings and revenues back into the service. Although ridership declined due to the slow economy we have continued to improve our service delivery, reliability, and customer satisfaction, which consistently tops the rankings of all Amtrak-operated services.
    [Show full text]
  • West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study
    West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #4 Summary and Evaluation of Prior Studies September 2015 West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study Document Version Control Revision Updated By Organization Description of Revision Date Incorporate feedback from BART 8/14/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff Board Member City of Richmond staff requested that South Richmond Transportation 8/20/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff Connectivity Plan be included. Tech memo updated to note that this plan is covered in Section 2.15 Incorporated edits to address SMG 8/27/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff and TAC feedback 9/16/15 Tam Tran Parsons Brinckerhoff Made minor edits related to tense Document Sign-off Name Date Signature Rebecca Kohlstrand 09/16/15 ii Draft Summary and Evaluation of Prior Studies September 2015 West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 West Contra Costa County Transportation Setting ........................................... 1 1.2 Study Purpose .................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Memorandum ........................................................... 3 2 Review OF Prior Studies .................................................................................... 4 2.1 BART West Contra Costa Extension Study, 1983 ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Area Regional Rail Plan, Chapter 7
    7.0 ALTERNATIVES DEFINITION & Fig. 7 Resolution 3434 EVALUATION — STEP-BY-STEP Step One: Base Network Healdsburg Sonoma Recognizing that Resolution 3434 represents County 8 MTC’s regional rail investment over the next 25 Santa years as adopted first in the 2001 Regional Trans- Rosa Napa portation Plan and reaffirmed in the subsequent County Vacaville 9 plan update, Resolution 3434 is included as part Napa of the “base case” network. Therefore, the study Petaluma Solano effort focuses on defining options for rail improve- County ments and expansions beyond Resolution 3434. Vallejo Resolution 3434 rail projects include: Marin County 8 9 Pittsburg 1. BART/East Contra Costa Rail (eBART) San Antioch 1 Rafael Concord Richmond 2. ACE/Increased Services Walnut Berkeley Creek MTC Resolution 3434 Contra Costa 3. BART/I-580 Rail Right-of-Way Preservation County Rail Projects Oakland 4. Dumbarton Bridge Rail Service San 1 BART: East Contra Costa Extension Francisco 10 6 3 2 ACE: Increased Service 5. BART/Fremont-Warm Springs to San Jose Daly City 2 Pleasanton Livermore 3 South Extension BART: Rail Right-of-Way Preservation San Francisco Hayward Union City 4 Dumbarton Rail Alameda 6. Caltrain/Rapid Rail/Electrification & Extension San Mateo Fremont County 5 BART: Fremont/Warm Springs 4 to Downtown San Francisco/Transbay Transit to San Jose Extension 7 Redwood City 5 Center 6 & Extension to Downtown SF/ Mountain Milpitas Transbay Transit Center View Palo Alto 7. Caltrain/Express Service 7 Caltrain: Express Service Sunnyvale Santa Clara San San Santa Clara 8 Jose 8. SMART (Sonoma-Marin Rail) SMART (Sonoma-Marin Rail) Mateo Cupertino County 9 County 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Solano Transportation Authority
    Solano Transportation Authority Member Agencies: Benicia ♦ Dixon ♦ Fairfield ♦ Rio Vista ♦ Suisun City ♦ Vacaville ♦ Vallejo ♦ Solano County One Harbor Center, Ste. 130, Suisun City, CA 94585-2473 ♦ Phone (707) 424-6075 / Fax (707) 424-6074 Email: [email protected] ♦ Website: sta.ca.gov SOLANOEXPRESS INTERCITY TRANSIT CONSORTIUM 1:30 p.m., Tuesday, January 28, 2020 Solano Transportation Authority One Harbor Center, Suite 130 Suisun City, CA 94585 MEETING AGENDA ITEM STAFF PERSON 1. CALL TO ORDER Beth Kranda, Chair 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT (1:30 –1:35 p.m.) 4. SELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR FOR 2020 5. REPORTS FROM MTC, STA STAFF AND OTHER AGENCIES (1:35 – 1:55 p.m. A. Update on Transportation Development Act (TDA) Reform Michael Pimentel, CTA B. Update of Corridor Strategies for SR 37, I-80 and I-680 Lloyd Nadal and Katelyn Costa 6. CONSENT CALENDAR Recommendation: Approve the following consent items in one motion. (1:55 – 2:00 p.m.) A. Minutes of the Consortium Meeting of November 19, 2019 Johanna Masiclat Recommendation: Approve the Consortium Meeting Minutes of November 19, 2019. Pg. 5 CONSORTIUM MEMBERS Claudia Williams Diane Feinstein Brandon Thomson Beth Kranda Lori DaMassa Joyce Goodwin Debbie McQuilkin VACANT (Chair) (Vice Chair) Dixon Fairfield and Rio Vista Solano County Vacaville County of Solano Mobility STA Readi-Ride Suisun Transit Delta Breeze Transit City Coach Solano (FAST) (SolTrans) Ron Grassi STA Staff The complete Consortium packet is available1 on STA’s website: www.sta.ca.gov 7. ACTION FINANCIAL A. Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Application for Anthony Adams Solano Regional Transit Improvements Phase 2 Recommendation: Approve the following: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Update to the Safety Element of the General Plan
    CITY OF HERCULES SAFETY ELEMENT Administrative Draft November 2020 Draft 2020 | HERCULES SAFETY ELEMENT VI-1 VI-2 Table of Contents 1.INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW ............................................................................ 9 PLANNING PROCESS AND PUBLIC OUTREACH .......................................................................................................... 9 COMMUNITY PROFILE ............................................................................................................................................11 SENATE BILL 535 – DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES .......................................................................................................... 12 SENATE BILL 1000 – ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE................................................................................................................... 12 GENERAL PLAN POLICIES ........................................................................................................................................15 RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN ..........................................................................................................................15 LAND USE ELEMENT (ADOPTED 1998) ................................................................................................................................ 15 OPEN SPACE & CONSERVATION ELEMENT (ADOPTED 1998) ............................................................................................... 16 HOUSING ELEMENT (ADOPTED 2015) ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]