MTC, Regional Bicycle Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MTC, Regional Bicycle Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission RReeggiioonnaall BBiiccyyccllee PPllaann ffoorr tthhee SSaann FFrraanncciissccoo BBaayy AArreeaa 22000099 UUppddaattee March 2009 Prepared by: Eisen|Letunic Transportation, Environmental and Urban Planning www.eisenletunic.com In association with: Fehr & Peers transportation consultants Metropolitan Transportation Commission RReeggiioonnaall BBiiccyyccllee PPllaann ffoorr tthhee SSaann FFrraanncciissccoo BBaayy AArreeaa 22000099 UUppddaattee March 2009 Prepared by: Eisen|Letunic Transportation, Environmental and Urban Planning www.eisenletunic.com In association with: Fehr & Peers transportation consultants Table of Contents Chapter Page Table Page 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 3.1 Average Bay Area weekday bicycle trips .................................... 14 2. Goals and Policies ................................................................................ 5 3.2 Average Bay Area weekend bicycle trips ..................................... 15 3. Background ......................................................................................... 11 3.3 Average Bay Area total bicycle trips ............................................ 16 • Physical setting ............................................................................... 11 3.4 Bay Area daily journey‐to‐work commuters ............................... 17 • Trip‐making trends ........................................................................ 12 3.5 Bay Area bicycle/motor vehicle collisions ................................... 20 • Motor vehicle/bicycle collision analysis ...................................... 18 3.6 Bay Area bicycle/motor vehicle injuries and fatalities ............... 21 • MTC’s bicycle‐related programs and policies ............................ 23 3.7 Bay Area bicycle/motor vehicle collision analysis ...................... 22 4. A Survey of Regional Bicycle Facilities ........................................... 27 4.1 Completion status of Regional Bikeway Network ..................... 31 • Regional Bikeway Network .......................................................... 27 4.2 Regional Bikeway Network toll bridge links .............................. 32 • Bicycle access to public transit ...................................................... 43 4.3 Bicycle access to Bay Area’s 10 largest transit operators ........... 49 • Emerging bicycle innovations ...................................................... 50 4.4 BART electronic locker installation schedule .............................. 55 5. Costs and Revenue ............................................................................ 59 5.1 Regional Bikeway Network cost ................................................... 63 6. Next Steps ........................................................................................... 67 5.2 Projected revenue for bicycle projects & programs .................... 64 • Opportunities and Constraints ..................................................... 71 F‐1 Countywide bicycle planning ..................................................... 125 F‐2 Countywide sales tax bicycle funding ....................................... 126 Appendix Page Figure Page A. Unbuilt Regional Bikeway Network Links ................................... 77 Regional Bikeway Network map ......................................................... 33 B. Existing Regional Bikeway Network Links ................................... 93 Alameda County Regional Bikeway Network map .......................... 34 C. Routine Accommodation Policies ................................................. 101 Contra Costa County Regional Bikeway Network map ................... 35 D. Revenue Sources ............................................................................. 113 Marin County Regional Bikeway Network map ............................... 36 E. Data ................................................................................................... 119 Napa County Regional Bikeway Network map ................................ 37 F. Countywide Bicycle Planning ........................................................ 123 San Francisco County Regional Bikeway Network map .................. 38 G. Resources ......................................................................................... 131 San Mateo County Regional Bikeway Network map ....................... 39 Credits ................................................................................................... 139 Santa Clara County Regional Bikeway Network map ...................... 40 Solano County Regional Bikeway Network map .............................. 41 Sonoma County Regional Bikeway Network map ............................ 42 REGIONAL BICYCLE PLAN FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA | i ii | Metropolitan Transportation Commission 1 | Introduction In this era of increasing awareness of the ongoing maintenance, and safety and Why a Regional Bicycle Plan? critical difference that wise transportation promotion programs are needed. choices can make to global climate change, Transportation 2035 is a comprehensive the bicycle is emerging as a legitimate and The Regional Bicycle Plan for the San Francisco strategy to accommodate future growth, significant travel mode. Already, more than Bay Area is one component of the alleviate congestion, improve safety, reduce 300,000 bicycle trips are made every Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s pollution and ensure mobility for all weekday by Bay Area residents (see Table multipronged effort to promote bicycling residents regardless of income. 3.1), and bicycling has the potential to play a and bicycle safety while reversing decades much bigger role if current trends continue. of automobile‐oriented development. Transportation 2035 – the Regional Attention in the media, schools and popular Transportation Plan update – boosts bicycle culture has highlighted the adverse effect spending fivefold over prior Regional Bicycle that driving has on the planet’s climate, Plan expenditures (from $20 million to $1 energy supplies, gasoline prices, air and billion), increases funds to help spur water pollution and bicyclist and pedestrian compact transit‐oriented development and a safety. To maximize the number of people launches new Climate Action Program that bicycling to work, school, shopping and for will include new programs for bicycle fun throughout the nine‐county Bay Area, facilities (see Chapter 5). As a component of the Transportation 2035 myriad infrastructure improvements, plan, the Regional Bicycle Plan for the San REGIONAL BICYCLE PLAN FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA | 1 Chapter 1 Francisco Bay Area (“Regional Bicycle Plan” or This update to the Regional Bicycle Plan seeks includes both built and unbuilt segments, is “Plan”) seeks to support individuals who to: encourage, increase and promote safer to focus regional bicycle‐related funding on choose to shift modes from automobile to bicycling; provide an analysis of bicycle trip‐ high‐priority bicycle facilities that serve bicycle by making investments in the making and collision data; summarize regional trips. Regional Bikeway Network (RBN) and other countywide bicycle planning efforts bicycling facilities, and focusing growth in throughout the Bay Area; and document Almost 50 percent of the Priority Development Areas (PDAs), which advances in bicycle parking and other Network’s 2,140 miles has been encourage growth in existing communities important technologies. While the 2001 plan constructed. and promote connections between land‐use provided an inventory of bicycle facilities at and transportation. This plan presents data, transit facilities, this update further The 2001 Regional Bicycle Plan defined the provides guidance and makes investigates the relationship between original RBN. MTC staff created a new RBN recommendations to help propel these bicycling and public transportation in geographic information system (GIS) efforts forward. recognition of the importance of bicycle‐ database for this publication, which includes accessible transit and transit stations. updated mileage and cost information, and Plan update Because safe and convenient bicycle access county‐specific maps. Almost 50 percent of must include a place to securely store one’s the Network’s 2,140 miles have been The original Regional Bicycle Plan, published bicycle at destinations, bicycle parking, at constructed. The cost to construct the in 2001, documented the region’s bicycling public transit and elsewhere, is another remainder is estimated to be $1.4 billion, environment, identified the links in a focus of this plan update. including pathways on the region’s three regionwide bikeway network and remaining bicycle‐inaccessible toll bridges summarized corresponding funding The Regional Bikeway (see Chapter 5). sources. Network Plan development process A primary purpose of the Regional A focus of the Regional Bicycle Plan is the Bikeway Network is to focus Regional Bikeway Network (RBN), which A subcommittee of the Regional Bicycle regional bicycle-related funding defines the San Francisco Bay Area’s Working Group, an advisory committee to on high-priority bicycle facilities continuous and connected bicycling MTC staff, guided the development of the that serve regional trips. corridors of regional significance. A Regional Bicycle Plan (see “Credits” for primary purpose of the RBN, which membership list). The region’s congestion 2 | Metropolitan
Recommended publications
  • San Francisco Bay Trail at Point Molate
    San Francisco Bay Trail at Point Molate Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared For: Prepared By: East Bay Regional Park District NCE 2950 Peralta Oaks Court 501 Canal Blvd. Suite I Oakland, CA 94605 Richmond, CA 94804 Date: March 2018 NCE Project Number: 567.04.55 SAN FRANCISCO BAY TRAIL AT POINT MOLATE Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................... iii 1.0 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ................................................ 2 3.0 LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION .............................................................................. 2 4.0 PROJECT SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 3 4.1 Project Location ............................................................................................. 3 4.2 Project Background ........................................................................................ 3 4.3 Project Description ......................................................................................... 3 4.4 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting .................................................................. 5 5.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ............................................................ 9 I. Aesthetics ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF of GGT TRANSIT GUIDE Effective Date
    goldengate.org/alerts GOLDEN Follow us: ® Social icon Circle Only use blue and/or white. For more details check out our Brand Guidelines. ® GATE TRANSIT GUIDE SCHEDULE INFORMATION JUNE 13 - SEPTEMBER 11 SUMMER 2021 CUSTOMER SERVICE Monday – Friday 7am – 6pm CLOSED weekends and the following holidays: New Year’s, Presidents’, Memorial, Independence, Labor, Thanksgiving, and Christmas days call 511 toll free TDD 711 (say “Golden Gate Transit,” then “operator”) Para obtener más información en español, vea la página 8. Other languages call: 415.455.2000 Welcome Welcome to Golden Gate Transit Bus Security Notice and Ferry System! Unattended items on buses, ferries or at ter- Golden Gate Transit has been operating bus and minals may be subject to immediate disposal. ferry service since 1970 as a service of the Golden Golden Gate Bus and Golden Gate Ferry are Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District not responsible for items left in terminals, (District), which also maintains and operates the aboard ferry vessels or buses. Golden Gate Bridge. Golden Gate Transit is subsi- dized by toll revenues from the Golden Gate Bridge, In Case of Emergency by collection of fares, and to the extent available, If an emergency occurs, GGT works closely federal and state grants. The District does not have with Bay Area media to provide up-to-date authority to levy a tax. service information. Tune radios to local news stations KCBS (740 AM) or KGO (810 AM). Bus operators may be authorized to announce Golden Gate Transit the status of GGT operations. is
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
    San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Final Adopted September 8, 2011 City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Prepared by: Alta Planning + Design in association with Fehr & Peers and Eisen | Letunic San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Acknowledgements C/CAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Matt Grocott, Chair Judi Mosqueda, Vice Chair Naomi Patridge Karyl Matsumoto Cory Roay Ken Ibarra Marge Colapietro Ian Bain Paul Grantham Steve Schmidt Frank Markowitz David Alfano Cathleen Baker Cathy Baylock Former Members Joel Slavit Julie Lancelle Lucy Wicks We wish to thank staff from the following agencies who contributed to this plan: Town of Atherton, City of Belmont, City of Brisbane, City of Burlingame, Town of Colma, City of Daly City, City of East Palo Alto, City of Foster City, City of Half Moon Bay, Town of Hillsborough, City of Menlo Park, City of Millbrae, City of Pacifica, Town of Portola Valley, City of Redwood City, City of San Bruno, City of San Carlos, City of San Mateo, City of South San Francisco, Town of Woodside, County of San Mateo, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Caltrans District 4, SamTrans, San Francisco International Airport, San Mateo County Transportation Authority, and City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County. This page intentionally left blank. San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Table of Contents GLOSSARY AND LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Sign-On Letter Cardin-Cochran Amendment 1549-AARP
    2/13/2012 «F1» Dear Senator «Last_Name», We are writing to request your support for the Cardin/Cochran amendment #1549 to MAP- 21, to ensure local access to Transportation Enhancement (TE) and Safe Routes to School (SRTS) funds. This amendment will ensure the effective implementation of TE and SRTS eligibilities by empowering local governments through suballocation of funds to Tier I metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs). In addition, for localities outside of Tier I MPOs, the amendment provides a streamlined administrative structure for a statewide pool set aside for these activities. At the same time, the amendment improves capacity for state departments of transportation (DOTs) to partner with locals. Since 1992, the Transportation Enhancements program has brought tremendous benefits to local communities through improved transportation choice, economic development, historic revitalization, and environmental restoration of the surface transportation system. This program enjoys broad local support in every state. For example, just in one area in Florida, 13 counties, cities and transportation agencies in and around Daytona Beach have passed resolutions supporting federal investment in TE. Local communities also support TE because of the job-creation benefits these projects provide; a recent American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials/Transportation Research Board study found that TE projects create more jobs per dollar than any other type of Federal-aid highway spending. However, a major challenge for state DOTs in implementing this program has been the local-scale orientation of the eligible activities, a non-traditional area for state DOTs. There is limited capacity at the state level for addressing these myriad, sometimes competing, priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Plan Bay Area 2050 Air Quality Conformity Analysis
    DRAFT AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY AND CONSISTENCY REPORT JULY 2021 PBA2050 COMMISH BOARD DRAFT 06.14.21 Metropolitan Transportation Association of City Representatives Commission Bay Area Governments Susan Adams Alfredo Pedroza, Chair Jesse Arreguín, President Councilmember, City of Rohnert Park Napa County and Cities Mayor, City of Berkeley Nikki Fortunato Bas Nick Josefowitz, Vice Chair Belia Ramos, Vice President Councilmember, City of Oakland San Francisco Mayor's Appointee Supervisor, County of Napa London Breed Margaret Abe-Koga David Rabbitt, Mayor, City and County of San Francisco Cities of Santa Clara County Immediate Past President Tom Butt Supervisor, County of Sonoma Eddie H. Ahn Mayor, City of Richmond San Francisco Bay Conservation Pat Eklund and Development Commission County Representatives Mayor, City of Novato David Canepa Candace Andersen Maya Esparza San Mateo County Supervisor, County of Contra Costa Councilmember, City of San José Cindy Chavez David Canepa Carroll Fife Santa Clara County Supervisor, County of San Mateo Councilmember, City of Oakland Damon Connolly Keith Carson Neysa Fligor Marin County and Cities Supervisor, County of Alameda Mayor, City of Los Altos Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cindy Chavez Leon Garcia Cities of Alameda County Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of American Canyon Dina El-Tawansy Otto Lee Liz Gibbons California State Transportation Agency Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of Campbell (CalSTA) Gordon Mar Giselle Hale Victoria Fleming Supervisor, City and County Vice Mayor, City of Redwood City Sonoma County and Cities of San Francisco Barbara Halliday Dorene M. Giacopini Rafael Mandelman Mayor, City of Hayward U.S. Department of Transportation Supervisor, City and County Rich Hillis Federal D.
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda Countywide Transportation Model
    ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION MODEL PLAN BAY AREA 2040 UPDATE Draft Documentation Report January, 2019 Alameda Countywide Travel Model Project #: 19752 January 10, 2019 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Alameda Countywide Transportation Model .......................................................................... i Plan Bay Area 2040 Update.................................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. v Summary ................................................................................................................................. vii Key Features ......................................................................................................................................................... vii Key Updates .......................................................................................................................................................... ix Selected Consistency Results ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]
  • Budget & Finance Agenda
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS MOBILE SOURCE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEMBERS TIM SMITH - CHAIR JAKE McGOLDRICK – VICE CHAIR TOM BATES SCOTT HAGGERTY YORIKO KISHIMOTO CAROL KLATT MARK ROSS JOHN SILVA GAYLE B. UILKEMA WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 19, 2008 4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM Immediately following Board Meeting DISTRICT OFFICES AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL 2. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items Pursuant to Government Code § 54954.3) Members of the public are afforded the opportunity to speak on any agenda item. All agendas for regular meetings are posted at District headquarters, 939 Ellis Street, San Francisco, CA, at least 72 hours in advance of a regular meeting. At the beginning of the regular meeting agenda, an opportunity is also provided for the public to speak on any subject within the Committee’s subject matter jurisdiction. Speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes each. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 23, 2008 4. CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACTOR SELECTION FOR THE VEHICLE BUY-BACK PROGRAM J. Colbourn/5192 [email protected] The Committee will consider recommending Board of Directors’ approval of one or more contractors to provide dismantling services for the Vehicle Buy Back Program. 5. CONSIDERATION OF $41,498,594 IN CALIFORNIA GOODS MOVEMENT BOND FUNDING PROJECTS J. Broadbent/5052 [email protected] The Committee will consider recommending Board of Directors’ approval of staff recommendations for $41,498,594 in funding for eligible projects under the California Goods Movement Bond Program and authorize the Executive Officer/APCO to enter into all necessary contracts to expend the requested funds. 6. AUDIT OF THE TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR CLEAN AIR (TFCA) REGIONAL FUND J.
    [Show full text]
  • West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study
    West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #4 Summary and Evaluation of Prior Studies September 2015 West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study Document Version Control Revision Updated By Organization Description of Revision Date Incorporate feedback from BART 8/14/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff Board Member City of Richmond staff requested that South Richmond Transportation 8/20/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff Connectivity Plan be included. Tech memo updated to note that this plan is covered in Section 2.15 Incorporated edits to address SMG 8/27/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff and TAC feedback 9/16/15 Tam Tran Parsons Brinckerhoff Made minor edits related to tense Document Sign-off Name Date Signature Rebecca Kohlstrand 09/16/15 ii Draft Summary and Evaluation of Prior Studies September 2015 West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 West Contra Costa County Transportation Setting ........................................... 1 1.2 Study Purpose .................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Memorandum ........................................................... 3 2 Review OF Prior Studies .................................................................................... 4 2.1 BART West Contra Costa Extension Study, 1983 ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Things to Do in San Francisco*
    100 Things to Do in San Francisco* Explore Your New Campus & City MORNING 1. Wake up early and watch the sunrise from the top of Bernal Hill. (Bernal Heights) 2. Uncover antique treasures and designer deals at the Treasure Island Flea Market. (Treasure Island) 3. Go trail running in Glen Canyon Park. (Glen Park) 4. Swim in Aquatic Park. (Fisherman's Wharf) 5. Take visitors to Fort Point at the base of the Golden Gate Bridge, where Kim Novak attempted suicide in Hitchcock's Vertigo. (Marina) 6. Get Zen on Sundays with free yoga classes in Dolores Park. (Dolores Park) 7. Bring Your Own Big Wheel on Easter Sunday. (Potrero Hill) 8. Play tennis at the Alice Marble tennis courts. (Russian Hill) 9. Sip a cappuccino on the sidewalk while the cable car cruises by at Nook. (Nob Hill) 10. Take in the views from seldom-visited Ina Coolbrith Park and listen to the sounds of North Beach below. (Nob Hill) 11. Brave the line at the Swan Oyster Depot for fresh seafood. (Nob Hill) *Adapted from 7x7.com 12. Drive down one of the steepest streets in town - either 22nd between Vicksburg and Church (Noe Valley) or Filbert between Leavenworth and Hyde (Russian Hill). 13. Nosh on some goodies at Noe Valley Bakery then shop along 24th Street. (Noe Valley) 14. Play a round of 9 or 18 at the Presidio Golf Course. (Presidio) 15. Hike around Angel Island in spring when the wildflowers are blooming. 16. Dress up in a crazy costume and run or walk Bay to Breakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay
    The Final Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program February 2021 Bay Area Metro Center 375 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 778-6700 phone [email protected] e-mail www.mtc.ca.gov web Project Staff Matt Maloney Acting Director, Planning Therese Trivedi Assistant Director Harold Brazil Senior Planner, Project Manager 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Conformity Analysis Page | i Table of Contents I. Summary of Conformity Analysis ...................................................................................................... 1 II. Transportation Control Measures .................................................................................................... 7 History of Transportation Control Measures .............................................................................. 7 Status of Transportation Control Measures................................................................................ 9 III. Response to Public Comments ...................................................................................................... 12 IV. Conformity Findings ...................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A. List of Projects in the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Appendix B. List of Projects in Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Conformity Analysis Page | ii I. Summary of Conformity Analysis The
    [Show full text]
  • Trails Workshop
    Trails Workshop © Photo by Jerry Ting October 29, 2019 THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 2 AGENDA Board Workshop: Sustainable Trails for All in New Parklands October 29, 2019 12:00 p.m. Introduction and Opening Comments Ayn Wieskamp, President, Board of Directors Robert E. Doyle, General Manager 12:10 p.m. Overview Kristina Kelchner, AGM, Acquisition, Stewardship & Development 12:20 p.m. Sustainable Trail Design and Planning Sean Dougan, Trails Development Program Manager Brian Holt, Chief of Planning and GIS 1:10 p.m. Public Comment 1:25 p.m. Break 1:45 p.m. Facilitated Board Discussion Lou Hexter (Moore, Iacofano, & Goltsman, Inc.) 3:00 p.m. Additional Public Comment/Response 3:45 p.m. Closing Comments 4:00 p.m. Adjournment 3 THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. MEMORANDUM TO THE BOARD ................................................................ 7 2. GLOSSARY OF TRAIL TERMINOLOGY .................................................... 15 3. CA STATE PARK TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS SUMMARY ................. 22 4. MAP ................................................................................................................... 28 5 THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 6 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT MEMORANDUM October 29, 2019 To: Board of Directors From: Robert E. Doyle, General Manager Dr. Ana M. Alvarez, Deputy General Manager Kristina Kelchner, Assistant General Manager, ASD Division Subject: Board Workshop on Sustainable Trails for All in Recently Acquired Parklands The Acquisition, Stewardship, and Development (ASD) Division appreciates the Board of Directors’ request for this workshop on trails. As one of the primary ways that people engage with the parks, trails are critical to the Park District’s mission of connecting people to nature. The workshop discussion will focus on the Park District’s Master Plan policy of providing “trails for all” through development of new sustainable, natural surface, multi-use trails in recently acquired parklands.
    [Show full text]