Senate Sign-On Letter Cardin-Cochran Amendment 1549-AARP

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Senate Sign-On Letter Cardin-Cochran Amendment 1549-AARP 2/13/2012 «F1» Dear Senator «Last_Name», We are writing to request your support for the Cardin/Cochran amendment #1549 to MAP- 21, to ensure local access to Transportation Enhancement (TE) and Safe Routes to School (SRTS) funds. This amendment will ensure the effective implementation of TE and SRTS eligibilities by empowering local governments through suballocation of funds to Tier I metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs). In addition, for localities outside of Tier I MPOs, the amendment provides a streamlined administrative structure for a statewide pool set aside for these activities. At the same time, the amendment improves capacity for state departments of transportation (DOTs) to partner with locals. Since 1992, the Transportation Enhancements program has brought tremendous benefits to local communities through improved transportation choice, economic development, historic revitalization, and environmental restoration of the surface transportation system. This program enjoys broad local support in every state. For example, just in one area in Florida, 13 counties, cities and transportation agencies in and around Daytona Beach have passed resolutions supporting federal investment in TE. Local communities also support TE because of the job-creation benefits these projects provide; a recent American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials/Transportation Research Board study found that TE projects create more jobs per dollar than any other type of Federal-aid highway spending. However, a major challenge for state DOTs in implementing this program has been the local-scale orientation of the eligible activities, a non-traditional area for state DOTs. There is limited capacity at the state level for addressing these myriad, sometimes competing, priorities. The Cardin/Cochran amendment resolves these issues in an elegant, win-win modification of the original bill language. The Safe Routes to School program similarly benefits local communities by targeting specific schools for infrastructure improvements and educational programs that promote safety. The simple fact is that in the early 1970’s, half of all American kids walked or biked to school; now the figure is only 15 percent. The SRTS program has been profoundly influential in empowering a grassroots movement to turn around this trend. Parents know best what is needed to create safe conditions for their children to walk and bike to school – the Cardin/Cochran amendment brings these decisions closer to them. Every dollar in MAP-21 available to help children be active and safe should be spent in the most efficient way possible, and the Cardin/Cochran amendment will achieve this. Friends of the Northern Rail Trail in Merrimack County MAINKearney STREET National Organizations AARP National Bicycle Dealers Association Adventure Cycling National Center for Bicycling and Walking Alliance for Bicycling and Walking National Complete Streets Coalition America Bikes National Recreation and Park Association America Walks National Trust for Historic Preservation American Cultural Resources Association National Wildlife Federation American Heart Association Natural Resources Defense Council American Horse Council Outdoor Alliance American Public Health Association Pedal America American Recreation Coalition Performance Bicycle American Rivers Preservation Action American Society of Landscape Architects Professional Trailbuilders Association American Trails Public Health Law and Policy American YouthWorks Rails-to-Trails Conservancy America's State Parks Raleigh America Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Safe Kids Worldwide Professionals (APBP) Safe Routes to School National Partnership Bicycle Technologies International Shimano American Corporation Camelbak Sierra Club Choose Outdoors Society for Historical Archaeology City Parks Alliance SRAM Coalition for Recreational Trails Student Conservation Association Diamondback Bicycles The Corps Network eXperticity Transportation for America Institute for Transportation Development and Trust for America’s Health Policy (ITDP) Yeti Cycles International Mountain Biking Association YMCA of the USA League of American Bicyclists League of Conservation Voters Trailsnet.com Dirt Rag Magazine Ride America for Safe Routes SockGuy Regional Organizations Appalachian Mountain Club (CT, DE, DC, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, VA, WV) The Arkansas River Coalition (AR, CO, KS, OK) East Coast Greenway Alliance (CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, NC, PA, RI, SC, VA) Landscape Architects & Planners, Inc. (OH, IL, IN, MI) Mississippi River Trail, Inc. (AR, IL, IA, KY, LA, MN, MS, MO, TN, WI) Southwest Conservation Corps (AZ, CO, NM) Tahoe-Pyramid Bikeway (CA, NV) Trail Spinners (DE, MD, PA) Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area (CT, MA) Upper Valley Trails Alliance (NH, VT) State Organizations Coalition of Arizona Bicyclists (AZ) Massachusetts Bicycle Coalition (MA) California Bicycle Coalition (CA) Child Safety Solutions (ME) California State Alliance of YMCAs (CA) Michigan Trails & Greenways Alliance (MI) California Trails and Greenways Foundation (CA) Motor City Tour Company, LLC (MI) Cycle California! Magazine (CA) State Alliance of Michigan YMCAs (MI) Ecology Action (CA) Preservation Alliance of Minnesota (MN) TransForm (CA) Missouri State Alliance of YMCAs (MO) Colorado High School Cycling League (CO) Mississippi Main Street Association (MS) Colorado State Alliance of YMCAs (CO) Mississippi State Alliance of YMCAs (MS) Bike Walk Connecticut (CT) Montana Conservation Corps (MT) Connecticut Main Street Center (CT) Montana State Alliance of YMCAs (MT) Delaware Council on Greenways & Trails (DE) Friends of the Mountains-to-Sea Trail (NC) Delaware Equine Council – Trails Committee North Carolina State Alliance of YMCAs (NC) (DE) Nebraska Trails Council (NE) Florida State Alliance of YMCAs (FL) New Jersey Trails Council (NJ) Florida Trail Association (FL) New Jersey YMCA State Alliance (NJ) Georgia State Alliance of YMCAs (GA) Alliance of New York State YMCAs (NY) Iowa State Alliance of YMCAs (IA) Parks & Trails New York (NY) Idaho Pedestrian and Bicycle Alliance (ID) Ohio State Alliance of YMCAs (OH) Idaho State Alliance of YMCAs (ID) Pioneering Healthier Communities Ohio (OH) Illinois State Alliance of YMCAs (IL) Oklahoma State Alliance of YMCAs (OK) Health by Design (IN) Bicycle Transportation Alliance (OR) Indiana State Alliance of YMCAs (IN) Oregon Bicycle Racing Association (OR) Kansas State Alliance of YMCAs (KS) Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PA) Kentucky State Alliance of YMCAs (KY) JAYCEE Education & Library Foundation of Louisiana Landmarks Society (LA) Rhode Island (RI) Louisiana State Alliance of YMCAs (LA) South Carolina Horsemen’s Council (SC) South Carolina State Alliance of YMCAs (SC) Texas YMCA State Alliance (TX) South Dakota State Alliance of YMCAs (SD) Utah Conservation Corps (UT) Tennessee Preservation Trust (TN) Utah State Alliance of Ys (UT) Tennessee State Alliance of YMCAs (TN) Washington State Alliance of YMCAs (WA) Preservation Texas, Inc. (TX) Wisconsin/UP YMCA State Alliance (WI) Texas Recreation and Park Society (TX) Local Organizations Baldwin County Trailblazers (AL) San Francisco Bicycle Coalition (CA) Dothan Leisure Services (AL) San Luis Obispo County Bicycle Coalition (CA) Limestone County Park and Recreation Board Santa Cruz Bicycle Industry Coalition (CA) (AL) Santa Cruz County Friends of the Rail Trail (CA) Historic Park Hill Neighborhood Association (AR) Save Our Heritage Organisation (CA) Phat Tire Bike Shop (AR) Sierra Buttes Trails Stewardship (CA) Absolute Bikes (AZ) Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition (CA) TRACKS (AZ) The City Project (CA) Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition (CA) Transportation Agency for Monterey County Bay Area Bicycle Coalition (CA) (CA) Bay Area Ridge Trail (CA) WalkSanDiego (CA) Bellfree Contractors, Inc. (CA) Wilderness Trail Bikes (CA) Bicycle Trails Council of the East Bay (CA) Alchemist (CO) Bike San Gabriel Valley (CA) Avid4 Adventure (CO) California Public Health Association-North (CA) BetterRide, Inc. (CO) Cycling Camps San Diego (CA) Boulder Bike Tours (CO) East Bay Area Trails Council (CA) City of Boulder (CO) East Bay Bicycle Coalition (CA) Cycles of Life (CO) Family Cycling Center (CA) Everest Realty (CO) Fresno County Economic Opportunities Giant Cycling World (CO) Commission (CA) Mile Hi Rafting (CO) Hilride (CA) New Freedom Corporation (CO) Humboldt Trails Council (CA) Real Winter Park Inc (CO) Kirkwood Mountain Resort LLC (CA) SAK LLC Beavers Sports Shop, Ski4less, Snow Local Government Commission (CA) Mountain Sports (CO) Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition (CA) The Trailhead and Trailhead Cycle & Ski (CO) Marin County Bicycle Coalition (CA) Tin Shed Sports (CO) McCloud Local First Network (CA) Winter Park Resort (CO) Move San Diego (CA) Bike & Pedestrian Alliance of Clinton (CT) Napa County Bicycle Coalition (CA) Wooden Wheels (DE) Ryan Snyder Associates (CA) A1A Cycle Works (FL) San Diego Bicycle Coalition (CA) Naples Pathways Coalition (FL) San Francisco Bay Trail (CA) Alpha Bikes (GA) Athens-Clarke Heritage Foundation, Inc. (GA) Bike Doctor (MD) Cycle World Albany (GA) Bike Doctor Linthicum (MD) Family Life Chiropractic Center (GA) Beckett & Raeder (MI) Goldens Bicycle Shop (GA) Calhoun County Trailway Alliance (MI) West Maui Cycles (HI) Charter Township of Oakland (MI) Hawkeye Bicycle Association (IA) City of Ann Arbor (MI) The Bike Shop Inc (IA) City of Rochester Hills (MI) Two Knobby Tires (IA) Eaton County Parks (MI)
Recommended publications
  • San Francisco Bay Trail at Point Molate
    San Francisco Bay Trail at Point Molate Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared For: Prepared By: East Bay Regional Park District NCE 2950 Peralta Oaks Court 501 Canal Blvd. Suite I Oakland, CA 94605 Richmond, CA 94804 Date: March 2018 NCE Project Number: 567.04.55 SAN FRANCISCO BAY TRAIL AT POINT MOLATE Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................... iii 1.0 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ................................................ 2 3.0 LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION .............................................................................. 2 4.0 PROJECT SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 3 4.1 Project Location ............................................................................................. 3 4.2 Project Background ........................................................................................ 3 4.3 Project Description ......................................................................................... 3 4.4 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting .................................................................. 5 5.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ............................................................ 9 I. Aesthetics ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
    San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Final Adopted September 8, 2011 City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Prepared by: Alta Planning + Design in association with Fehr & Peers and Eisen | Letunic San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Acknowledgements C/CAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Matt Grocott, Chair Judi Mosqueda, Vice Chair Naomi Patridge Karyl Matsumoto Cory Roay Ken Ibarra Marge Colapietro Ian Bain Paul Grantham Steve Schmidt Frank Markowitz David Alfano Cathleen Baker Cathy Baylock Former Members Joel Slavit Julie Lancelle Lucy Wicks We wish to thank staff from the following agencies who contributed to this plan: Town of Atherton, City of Belmont, City of Brisbane, City of Burlingame, Town of Colma, City of Daly City, City of East Palo Alto, City of Foster City, City of Half Moon Bay, Town of Hillsborough, City of Menlo Park, City of Millbrae, City of Pacifica, Town of Portola Valley, City of Redwood City, City of San Bruno, City of San Carlos, City of San Mateo, City of South San Francisco, Town of Woodside, County of San Mateo, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Caltrans District 4, SamTrans, San Francisco International Airport, San Mateo County Transportation Authority, and City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County. This page intentionally left blank. San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Table of Contents GLOSSARY AND LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California Trail Corridor System Update
    California Trail Corridor System • Existing or planned long distance trail routes • Identified in the California Recreational Trails Act, 1978 • Must meet 3 of 10 established criteria in California Recreational Trails Plan California Trail Corridors • Currently the 26 Trail Corridors in California are in various levels of development, planning, completion and public use. • Trail Corridors are in the backcountry, on the coast, in cities, suburbs, along rivers, through historic routes and on abandoned rail grades. Corridors with Substantial Progress or Completed • American Discovery Trail • Bay Area Ridge Trail • California Coastal Trail • Lake Tahoe Bikeway • Los Angeles River Trail • San Gabriel River Trail • Mokelumne Coast to Crest Trail • Pacific Crest Trail • San Francisco Bay Trail • San Joaquin River Trail • Santa Ana River Trail • Tahoe Rim Trail • Trans County Trail Corridors With Minimal Progress Characteristics: major gaps and minimal management These trails include: • Cuesta to Sespe Trail • Condor Trail • Merced River Trail • Whittier to Ortega Trail • Tuolumne Complex Trails Corridors With Little or no Progress • Redwood Coast to Crest Trail • Cross California Ecological Trail Heritage Corridors and Historic Routes: • Pony Express National Historic Trail 140 miles long in CA, along the Highway 50 Corridor, about 25 miles is in the El Dorado National Forest. • Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail Through 14 counties and 2 states, traces the 1,210 mile route of explorer Juan Bautista de Anza over dirt trails and roads close to the historic route. Next Steps • Maintain up-to-date database, contact information, mapping and planning progress of Trail Corridors from managing entities. • Compile information on new Trail Corridors currently not included in the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget & Finance Agenda
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS MOBILE SOURCE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEMBERS SHELIA YOUNG - CHAIRPERSON TIM SMITH – VICE CHAIRPERSON ROBERTA COOPER JERRY HILL JAKE McGOLDRICK NATE MILEY JULIA MILLER JOHN SILVA PAMELA TORLIATT THURSDAY OCTOBER 14, 2004 FOURTH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 9:30 A.M. DISTRICT OFFICES AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL 2. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items Pursuant to Government Code § 54954.3) Members of the public are afforded the opportunity to speak on any agenda item. All agendas for regular meetings are posted at District headquarters, 939 Ellis Street, San Francisco, CA, at least 72 hours in advance of a regular meeting. At the beginning of the regular meeting agenda, an opportunity is also provided for the public to speak on any subject within the Committee’s subject matter jurisdiction. Speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes each. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 8, 2004 4. CONTRACTOR SELECTION FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE VEHICLE BUY BACK PROGRAM J. Roggenkamp/4646 [email protected] Consider recommending Board of Directors’ approval of vehicle dismantling contractors for the expansion of the FY 2004/2005 Vehicle Buy Back Program. 5. TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR CLEAN AIR REGIONAL FUND GRANT AWARDS FOR FY 2004/05 J. Roggenkamp/4646 [email protected] Consider recommending Board of Directors’ approval of Transportation Fund for Clean Air Regional Fund grant awards for FY 2004/2005. 6. AUDIT OF THE TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR CLEAN AIR COUNTY PROGRAM MANAGER FUND J. Roggenkamp/4646 [email protected] Receive a report on the audit of projects funded by the Transportation Fund for Clean Air County Program Manager Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Past Trail Award Winners
    PAST WINNERS OF CALIFORNIA TRAILS CONFERENCE AWARDS (NOTE 1: Until 1998, there were no standard award categories or criteria) (NOTE 2: This list does not include California Trail Days Awards given by the Trails and Greenways Foundation, nor does it include the Harry Dean Jr. Memorial Awards given by Whole Access.) 1994 Lifetime Achievement George Cardinet Outstanding Trail Program Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 1995 Lifetime Achievement Ross Henry 1996 Lifetime Achievement Hulet Hornbeck Program Merit Award Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation 1997 Lifetime Achievement Vie and George Obern Trail Merit #1 Heritage Trails Fund Trail Merit #2 Coastwalk 1998 Lifetime Achievement Claude A. (Tony) and Mildred Look Trail Project Merit Award Town of Mammoth Lakes Trail Program Merit Award East Bay Regional Park District 1999 Lifetime Achievement Ilse Byrnes Trail Project Merit Awards Carlsbad Watershed Network Trail Program Merit Award #1 Mokelumne Trailbusters Trail Program Merit Award #2 Bay Trail & CCC’S Reg. Development Program Trail Leadership Award Donald Murphy National Park Service’s Rivers, Trails & Conservation Special Recognition Assistance Program 2000 Trail Project Merit Award #1 City of Clovis, Coalition for Community Trails Trail Project Merit Award #2 City of Fresno, Tree Fresno Trail Program Merit Award Santa Cruz Mountains Trail Association Trail Event Merit Award Bay Area Ridge Trail Council Honorable Mentions (Project) #1 Red Bluff United Honorable Mentions (Project) #2 CCC’s Pacific Bay and San Luis Obispo Crews Honorable
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycles Mcp-2776 a Global Strategic Business Report
    BICYCLES MCP-2776 A GLOBAL STRATEGIC BUSINESS REPORT CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION, METHODOLOGY & Pacific Cycles Launches New Sting-Ray .............................II-16 PRODUCT DEFINITIONS Mongoose Launches Ritual ..................................................II-16 Multivac Unveils Battery-Powered Bicycle .........................II-17 TI Launches New Range of Mountain Terrain Bikes ...........II-17 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TI Inaugurates its First Cycleworld Outlet ...........................II-17 Shanghai Greenlight Electric Bicycle Launches 1. Introduction................................................................. II-1 Powerzinc Electric ............................................................II-17 Smith & Wesson Introduces Mountain Bikes in 2. Industry Overview ...................................................... II-2 Three Models....................................................................II-17 Historic Review......................................................................II-2 Diggler Unveils a Hybrid Machine.......................................II-17 Manufacturing Base Shifting to Southeast Asia .....................II-2 Avon Introduces New Range of Bicycle Models..................II-18 Manufacturing Trends............................................................II-3 Dorel Launches a New Line of Bicycle Ranges ...................II-18 Factors Affecting the Bicycle Market.....................................II-3 Ford Vietnam Launches Electric Bicycles............................II-18 Characteristics of the
    [Show full text]
  • The American Alpine Club Guidebook to Membership Alpinist Magazine
    THE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB GUIDEBOOK TO MEMBERSHIP ALPINIST MAGAZINE ith each print edition of Alpinist, we aim to create a work of art, paying attention to every detail— from our extended photo captions to our carefully Wselected images and well-crafted stories. Inside our pages, we strive to offer our readers an experience like that of exploratory climbing, a realm of words and images where they can wander, discover surprising new viewpoints, and encounter moments of excitement, humor, awe and beauty. By publishing the work of climbers from a wide range of ages, technical abilities, nations and cultures—united by their passion for adventure and wild places—we hope to reflect and enhance the sense of community within the climbing life. Over time, back issues have become collectors’ items, serving as historical references and ongoing inspirations. Like our readers, we believe that great writing and art about climbing demand the same boldness, commitment and vision as the pursuit itself. JOIN US. Exclusive AAC Member Pricing 1 Year - $29.95 | 2 Years - $54.95 Alpinist.com/AAC ALPINIST IS A PROUD PARTNER OF THE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB Stay Connected! @AlpinistMag @Alpinist @AlpinistMag ALP_2019_AAC Ad FIN.indd 1 6/26/19 4:14 PM WELCOME, ALL 5 You Belong Here ARTIST SPOTLIGHT 8 Brooklyn Bell on Art for the In-betweens MEMBERSHIP THROUGH THE LENS 10 Inspiration, Delivered Directly NAVAJO RISING 23 An Indigenous Emergence Story WHEN WOMEN LEAD 27 Single Pitch Instructors for the 21st Century GLACIAL VIEWS 29 A Climate Scientist Reflects & Other Research Stories CLIMBERS FOR CLIMATE 32 Taking a Stand on Climate Change, Together 1CLIMB, INFINITE POTENTIAL 34 Kevin Jorgeson Breaks Down Walls by Building Them ON PUSHING 37 24 Hours Into the Black, the AAC Grief Fund AN ODE TO MOBILITY 40 The Range of Motion Project Tackles Cotopaxi YOSEMITE'S CAMP 4 43 The Center of the Climbing Universe REWIND THE CLIMB 47 The Tragedy of the 1932 American K2 Expedition BETA 48 Everything a Club Member Needs to Know PARTING SHOT 72 Jeremiah Watt on Travel & Life a Greg Kerzhner climbing Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Celebrates 30 Years of Trails Which Passes Through Philadelphia
    EVER GREEN Why trails? The Bay Trail was—and remains—a bold idea and an ambitious undertaking in terms of scale and geographical reach. The trail passes through nine counties and 47 cities, with many different kinds of experiences to be found in different segments—from busy urban areas along the Embarcadero in downtown San Fran- cisco to more remote and natural settings. Even though it is not fully finished, it is extremely popular and heavily used, with a wealth of benefits for residents. It’s a source of recreation, a way to get away and recharge, and a place to see and watch birds and experience nature. Increasingly, it’s also a transportation resource. On balance, the benefits of trails are considerable. The 2019 study Investing in The San Francisco Bay Trail winds through 350-plus miles of urban areas and waterfront. Our Future sought to estimate the health, environmental, and economic benefits of completing the East Coast Greenway, San Francisco Celebrates 30 Years of Trails which passes through Philadelphia. According to the report, the benefits HIS PAST JUNE, THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA celebrated the anniversary of a amount to 10 times the costs of comple- visionary plan. In 1989, the executive board of the Association of Bay Area Govern- tion, providing some $3 billion annually T ments greenlit the San Francisco Bay Trail, a 500-mile, continuous hiking trail that just for the sections local to Philadelphia. stretches along the edge of the Bay. Today, that plan still serves as the blueprint for the And there are a range of other values trail, which is 70 percent complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Trail Richmond New Year 2021 Report
    Bay Trail Richmond New Year 2021 Report This has been an extraordinary year for the San Francisco Bay Trail in Richmond! The City of Richmond (City) completed the long-awaited Bay Trail connection with Point Pinole Regional Shoreline, and over $4 million in grant funds were secured by the City and East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) to construct new and improved sections of Bay Trail. The Bay Trail’s popularity soared as an excellent place to refresh the mind and exercise the body with adequate width for social distancing. This 22nd New Year report by TRAC, the Trails for Richmond Action Committee, describes progress during 2020 toward closing gaps and improving existing sections of the Bay Trail. The map on the last page of this report shows trail completed and gaps remaining. Richmond has 36 miles of Bay Trail in place, representing 10% of the existing 352 miles of this planned 500-mile walking and cycling path encircling San Francisco and San Pablo Bays. However, 6.0 miles of gaps remain in Richmond, despite having more Bay Trail completed than any other city in the Bay Area. Stay healthy and be well. See you on the Bay Trail! POINT PINOLE CONNECTED WITH THE BAY TRAIL The City completed construction of a two-way, multi-use trail east of Goodick Avenue between the Richmond Parkway Bay Trail and Dotson Family Marsh Staging Area. This project was funded by a $976,000 grant of Measure J gasoline tax revenues from Contra Costa Transportation Authority and $130,000 from the Bay Trail Project at the Association of Bay Area Governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidio Trails and Bikeways Master Plan & Environmental Assessment TABLE of CONTENTS
    National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior The Presidio Trust Presidio of San Francisco, Golden Gate National Recreation Area July 2003 Presidio Trails and Bikeways Master Plan & Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction A Vision of the Future . .1 The Master Plan . .1 Analysis and Alternatives Development . .2 Document Organization . .2 The Presidio's History . .3 Planning Context . .4 Planning Process . .4 Public Involvement . .6 Changes to the Trails Plan . .7 Plan Implementation . .10 Prioritization and Phasing . .10 Environmental Assessment . .10 Chapter 2: Purpose and Need Project Purpose . .13 Project Need . .13 Goals . .13 Chapter 3: Trail Classifications and Design Guidelines User Groups . .17 Trails and Bikeways Classification System . .17 Pedestrian Trails . .19 Multi-Use Trails . .21 Bikeways . .22 Bikeway Design . .22 Accessibility . .24 Accessible Trails . .25 CONTENTS i Presidio Trails & Bikeways master plan Trail Features . .27 Best Management Practices . .29 Chapter 4: Alternatives Alternative Descriptions . .31 Changes to Existing Trail Corridors . .35 New Trail Corridors . .44 Overall Trail Network . .48 Comparisons at Key Locations . .58 Environmentally Preferrable Alternative . .66 Chapter 5: Environmental Consequences Introduction and Methodology . .67 Geologic Resources . .67 Hydrologic Resources . .69 Biological Resources . .71 Cultural Resources . .78 Traffic Safety . .80 Visitor Use . .83 Visual Resources . .86 Air Quality . .88 Noise . .89 Cumulative Impacts . .90 Impact Topics Dismissed from Further Analysis . .96 Chapter 6: Consultation and References Interagency Review . .97 List of Persons and Agencies Consulted . .98 List of Preparers . .99 References . .99 ii CONTENTS Chapter 7: Appendices Appendix A: Finding of No Significant Impact . .A-1 Appendix B: Response to Comments . .B-1 Appendix C: Best Management Practices .
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Trail – Replace Decking on Crissy Field Promenade Bridge Final Programmatic Report January, 2019
    National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior NPS Cosco Busan Recreational Use Program Bay Trail – Replace Decking on Crissy Field Promenade Bridge Final Programmatic Report January, 2019 Recipient Park Unit: Golden Gate National Recreation Area Project Location: Crissy Field, Presidio of San Francisco Date Approved: January 8, 2013 Project Period: June 2013 – February 2015 Award Amount: $37,000 Total Expended: $37,000 Project Number: PXP0202308 1. Summary of Accomplishments The Crissy Field Promenade Bridge is part of the Golden Gate Promenade, a component of the San Francisco Bay Trail. It spans the tidal marsh at Crissy Field and provides a walking and biking connection used by thousands of visitors and local residents every day to enjoy the park, the Golden Gate Bridge views, and shop at park cafes and stores. The 25-foot wide, 86-foot long bridge was constructed in 1999. Inspections in 2008 and 2012 identified tripping and walking safety hazards in need of repair. This project mitigated those safety hazards by rolling the existing bridge deck boards over, and replacing the original bolts. 2. Project Activities & Outcomes The proposal to replace the bridge decking proved to be cost prohibitive, so a revised project was approved to repair, rather than replace, the decking. The original pedestrian and bicycling bridge decking was constructed in 4 spans with 6”x12” pressure-treated lumber deck boards, with 3”x12” pressure-treated stringer boards providing the underlayment for the decking. The deck boards were attached with steel lag screws covered with tar caps. The NPS contracted with AMA Diversified Construction Group to conduct the bridge decking repairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Bike Market Research Report- Forecast 2027
    Report Information More information from: https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/5165 Mountain Bike Market Research Report- Forecast 2027 Report / Search Code: MRFR/AM/3727-HCR Publish Date: October, 2021 Request Sample Price 1-user PDF : $ 4450.0 Enterprise PDF : $ 6250.0 Description: Mountain Bike Market overview The mountain bike is a type of bicycle used for recreation purpose. It is a flexible bike that is suitable for off-road races. The mountain bike is durable transport that survives the toughest of terrain and mountainous surfaces. There are mountain bike models with a suspension system and without a suspension system. The mountain bike is designed in a way to withstand severe friction when riding on steep surfaces. The mountain bikes come with a set of disk brakes. The large-sturdy tires of the mountain bike are long-lasting. Sports and fitness enthusiasts prefer mountain bikes. The increasing popularity of bike sports is the cause of the surging demand for mountain bikes. Recently the mountain bike market size is developing at an exponential pace. Further, the mountain bike market growth is estimated to be 10% for the forecast year 2023. The rising awareness about eco-friendly transport mediums is significant reasons for the high demand for mountain bikes. Covid 19 analysis of Mountain Bike Market Covid 19 continues to affect the supply-demand chain of global industries. Several industries find it difficult to cope with this situation. However, the covid 19 impact on the mountain bike market is indifferent. While other markets are experiencing a drop in demand, the mountain bike market trend shows substantial growth.
    [Show full text]