DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix A. Texas Amphibians Including Those Found in Four Urban Centers and in Other States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix A. Texas Amphibians Including Those Found in Four Urban Centers and in Other States Appendix A. Texas amphibians including those found in four urban centers and in other states. (Courtesy of Cassandra LaFleur) El Texas List of Amphibians Scientific Name AustinA DFW Houston States ChecklistB Paso 35 1. American Toad (Anaxyrus americanus) 1 2. Austin Blind Salamander (Eurycea waterlooensis) 2 3. Barking Frog (Craugastor augusti) E 18 4. Barred Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma mavortium) D 1 5. Barton Springs Salamander (Eurycea sosorum) A 1 6. Black-spotted newt (Notophthalmus meridionalis) 19 7. Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris blanchardi) A H 1 8. Blanco Blind Salamander (Eurycea robusta) 36 9. Bronze Frog (Rana clamitans) D H 49 10. Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) A D E H 6 11. Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) 3 12. Cane Toad (Rhinella marina) 6 13. Canyon Treefrog (Hyla arenicolor) 1 14. Cascade Caverns Salamander (Eurycea latitans) 1 15. Cliff Chirping Frog (Eleutherodactylus marnockii) A 1 16. Comal Blind Salamander (Eurycea tridentifera) 3 17. Common Plantanna (Xenopus laevis) 28 18. Cope's Gray Treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) D H 6 19. Couch's Spadefoot (Scaphiopus couchii) A D E H 11 20. Crawfish Frog (Rana areolata) D H 9 21. Dwarf Salamander (Eurycea quadridigitata) H 1 22. East Texas Toad (Bufo velatus) H 30 23. Eastern Gray Treefrog (Hyla versicolor) A D H 17 24. Eastern Narrow-mouthed Toad (Gastrophryne carolinensis) A D H 33 25. Eastern Newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) D H 29 26. Eastern Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) D E H 1 27. Fern Bank Salamander (Eurycea pterophila) 29 28. Fowler's Toad (Anaxyrus fowleri) 1 29. Georgetown Salamander (Eurycea naufragia) Appendix A. (Continued…) El States Texas List of Amphibians Scientific Name AustinA DFW Houston ChecklistB Paso 8 30. Great Plains Narrow-mouthed Toad (Gastrophryne olivacea) A D E H 17 31. Great Plains Toad (Anaxyrus cognatus) E 7 32. Greater siren (Siren lacertina) 6 33. Green Toad (Anaxyrus debilis) A D E 17 34. Green Treefrog (Hyla cinerea) A D H 3 35. Gulf Coast Toad (Incilius nebulifer) A D H 6 36. Gulf Coast Waterdog (Necturus beyeri) H 1 37. Houston Toad (Anaxyrus houstonensis) A H 3 38. Hurter's Spadefoot (Scaphiopus hurterii) D H 1 39. Jollyville Plateau Salamander (Eurycea tonkawae) 18 40. Lesser siren (Siren intermedia) D 26 41. Marbled Salamander (Ambystoma opacum) H 1 42. Mexican Burrowing Toad (Rhinophrynus dorsalis) 6 43. Mexican Spadefoot (Spea multiplicata) 1 44. Mexican Treefrog (Smilisca baudinii) 1 45. Mexican White-lipped Frog (Leptodactylus fragilis) 15 46. Mole Salamander (Ambystoma talpoideum) H 17 47. Northern Cricket Frog (Acris crepitans) A D H 34 48. Northern Leopard Frog (Rana pipiens) E 31 49. Pickerel Frog (Rana palustris) H 7 50. Pig Frog (Rana grylio) 13 51. Plains Leopard Frog (Rana blairi) D 14 52. Plains Spadefoot (Spea bombifrons) E 9 53. Red-Spotted Toad (Anaxyrus punctatus) A D E 2 54. Rio Grande Chirping Frog (Eleutherodactylus cystignathoides) D H 4 55. Rio Grande Leopard Frog (Rana berlandieri) A D E 1 56. Salado Salamander (Eurycea chisholmensis) 1 57. San Marcos Salamander (Eurycea nana) Appendix A. (Continued…) El States Texas List of Amphibians Scientific Name AustinA DFW Houston ChecklistB Paso 1 58. Sheep Frog (Hypopachus variolosus) 17 59. Small-Mouthed Salamander (Ambystoma texanum) A D H 9 60. Southern Dusky Salamander (Desmognathus auriculatus) H 24 61. Southern Leopard Frog (Rana sphenocephala) A D H 1 62. Spotted Chirping Frog (Eleutherodactylus guttilatus) 3 63. Spotted Chorus Frog (Pseudacris clarkii) A D 30 64. Spotted Salamander Ambystoma maculatum) H 33 65. Spring Peeper (Pseudacris crucifer) H 10 66. Squirrel Treefrog (Hyla squirella) H 7 67. Strecker's Chorus Frog (Pseudacris streckeri) A D H 1 68. Texas Blind Salamander (Eurycea rathbuni) 1 69. Texas Salamander (Eurycea neotenes) A 3 70. Texas Toad (Anaxyrus speciosus) A D E H 9 71. Three-toed Amphiuma (Amphiuma tridactylum) H 14 72. Upland Chorus Frog (Pseudacris feriarum) A D H 1 73. Valdina Farms Salamander (Eurycea troglodytes) 4 74. Western Slimy Salamander (Plethodon albagula) A 19 75. Woodhouse's Toad (Anaxyrus woodhousii) A D E A: Also includes species listed in Table 1 of Ferguson et al. 2008 76. B: Other urban amphibians observed by authors and Texas Master Naturalist Students 77. http://amphibiaweb.org/maps/geo- us.html http://www.kingsnake.com/dfw/species%20accounts/speciesaccounts.html http://www.dan-johnson.net/amphibians/houston_amphibians.html http://www.austinreptileservice.net/amphibians.html http://museum2.utep.edu/chih/pdf/Herplist.pdf .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cfreptiles & Amphibians
    WWW.IRCF.ORG TABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES &IRCF AMPHIBIANS REPTILES • VOL &15, AMPHIBIANS NO 4 • DEC 2008 • 189 27(2):288–292 • AUG 2020 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES . Chasing BullsnakesAmphibians (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: of the Melghat, On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of TreeboasMaharashtra, (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: India A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 RESEARCH ARTICLES Hayat A. Qureshi and Gajanan A. Wagh . Biodiversity Research Laboratory,The Texas Horned Department Lizard in of Central Zoology, and ShriWestern Shivaji Texas Science ....................... College, Emily Amravati, Henry, Jason Maharashtra–444603, Brewer, Krista Mougey, India and Gad (gaj [email protected]) 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida .............................................Brian J. Camposano,Photographs Kenneth L. Krysko, by the Kevin authors. M. Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 CONSERVATION ALERT . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 . More Than Mammals .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetological Journal FULL PAPER
    Volume 26 (January 2017), 73–80 Herpetological Journal FULL PAPER Published by the British Herpetological Society Reproductive biology of the nest building vizcacheras frog Leptodactylus bufonius (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae), including a description of unusual courtship behaviour Gabriel Faggioni1, Franco Souza1, Masao Uetanabaro1, Paulo Landgref-Filho2, Joe Furman3 & Cynthia Prado1,4 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brasil 2Campo Grande, Brasil 3Houston, USA 4Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia Animal, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, Brasil We describe the reproductive biology and sexual size dimorphism of a population of the vizcacheras frog Leptodactylus bufonius in the Brazilian Chaco. Reproduction takes place during the rainy months (September–March). During courtship, females emit reciprocal calls and both sexes perform vibratory movements of the body; the latter is described for the first time in anurans. Amplexus and oviposition occurred inside subterranean chambers. The temperature in closed chambers was lower than outside chambers, which may aid in reducing desiccation risks of eggs and tadpoles. Females were larger than males, but males had longer heads and shorter tibias, which may be related to digging. The study reinforces the importance of ongoing discoveries on anuran natural history. Keywords: Chaco, natural history, sexual size dimorphism, subterranean chamber, vibratory movements INTRODUCTION 1988; Haddad & Giaretta, 1999; Haddad & Sawaya, 2000; Lucas et al., 2008; Kokubum et al., 2009). he genus Leptodactylus Fitzinger, 1826, comprises 74 Species in the L. fuscus group reproduce in sub- species distributed from southern Texas to Argentina, terranean chambers which may vary in size, shape, includingT Caribbean islands (Frost, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Chec List a Checklist of the Amphibians and Reptiles of San
    Check List 10(4): 870–877, 2014 © 2014 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution PECIES S OF A checklist * of the amphibians and reptiles of San Isidro de ISTS L Dota, Reserva Forestal Los Santos, Costa Rica Erick Arias and Federico Bolaños [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica, Escuela de Biología, Museo de Zoología. San Pedro, 11501-2060, San José, Costa Rica. * Corresponding author. E-mail: Abstract: We present an inventory of amphibians and reptiles of San Isidro de Dota, northwest of the Cordillera de Talamanca in the Central Pacific of Costa Rica.Leptodactylus The study was insularum conduced from January to August 2012 in premontane wet Coloptychonforest from 689 rhombifer m to 800 m elevation. We found a total of 56 species, including 30 species of amphibians and 26 of reptiles. It results striking the presence of the frog , uncommon above 400 m elevation, and the lizard , a very uncommon species. DOI: 10.15560/10.4.870 Introduction datum, from 689 m to 800 N, 83°58′32.41″ W, WGS84et al. Lower Central America represents one of the regions m elevation). The region is dominated by premontane with the highest numberet al of amphibianset describedal. in the wet forest (Bolaños 1999) with several sites used Neotropics in relation to the area it represent (Savage for agriculture and pastures. The region presents the 2002; Boza-Oviedo . 2012; Hertz 2012). Much climate of the pacific slope of the Cordillera de Talamanca, of this richness of species iset associated al.
    [Show full text]
  • Myxozoan and Helminth Parasites of the Dwarf American Toad, Anaxyrus Americanus Charlesmithi (Anura: Bufonidae), from Arkansas and Oklahoma Chris T
    51 Myxozoan and Helminth Parasites of the Dwarf American Toad, Anaxyrus americanus charlesmithi (Anura: Bufonidae), from Arkansas and Oklahoma Chris T. McAllister Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745 Charles R. Bursey Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University-Shenango Campus, Sharon, PA 16146 Matthew B. Connior Health and Natural Sciences, South Arkansas Community College, El Dorado, AR 71730 Stanley E. Trauth Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, State University, AR 72467 Abstract: We examined 69 dwarf American toads, Anaxyrus americanus charlesmithi, from McCurtain County, Oklahoma (n = 37) and Miller, Nevada and Union counties, Arkansas (n = 32) for myxozoan and helminth parasites. The following endoparasites were found: a myxozoan, Cystodiscus sp., a trematode, Clinostomum marginatum, two tapeworms, Cylindrotaenia americana (Oklahoma only) and Distoichometra bufonis, five nematodes, acuariid larvae, Cosmocercoides variabilis, Oswaldocruzia pipiens, larval Physaloptera sp. (Arkansas only), and Rhabdias americanus (Arkansas only), and acanthocephalans (Oklahoma only). We document six new host and four new geographic distribution records for these select parasites.©2014 Oklahoma Academy of Science Introduction (McAllister et al. 2008), Cosmocercoides The dwarf American toad, Anaxyrus variabilis (McAllister and Bursey 2012a) and americanus charlesmithi, is a small anuran tetrathyridia of Mesocestoides sp. (McAllister that ranges from southwestern Indiana and et al. 2014c) from A. a. charlesmithi from southern Illinois south through central Arkansas, and Clinostomum marginatum from Missouri, western Kentucky and Tennessee, dwarf American toads from Oklahoma (Cross and all of Arkansas, to eastern Oklahoma and and Hranitz 2000). In addition, Langford and northeastern Texas (Conant and Collins 1998). Janovy (2013) reported Rhabdias americanus It occurs in various habitats, from suburban from A.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Incursion Plan PIP006 Salamanders and Newts
    Pre-incursion Plan PIP006 Salamanders and Newts Pre-incursion Plan PIP006 Salamanders and Newts Order: Ambystomatidae, Cryptobranchidea and Proteidae Scope This plan is in place to guide prevention and eradication activities and the management of non-indigenous populations of Salamanders and Newts (Order Caudata; Families Salamandridae, Ambystomatidae, Cryptobranchidea and Proteidae) amphibians in the wild in Victoria. Version Document Status Date Author Reviewed By Approved for Release 1.0 First Draft 26/07/11 Dana Price M. Corry, S. Wisniewski and A. Woolnough 1.1 Second Draft 21/10/11 Dana Price S. Wisniewski 2.0 Final Draft 18/01/2012 Dana Price 3.0 Revision Draft 12/11/15 Dana Price J. Goldsworthy 3.1 New Final 10/03/2016 Nigel Roberts D.Price New DEDJTR templates and document review Published by the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Agriculture Victoria, May 2016 © The State of Victoria 2016. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 1 Spring Street, Melbourne 3000. Front cover: Smooth Newt (Lissotriton vulgaris) Photo: Image courtesy of High Risk Invasive Animals group, DEDJTR Photo: Image from Wikimedia Commons and reproduced with permission under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic License. ISBN 078-1-925532-40-1 (pdf/online) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom
    lopmen ve ta e l B Williamson, Cell Dev Biol 2012, 1:1 D io & l l o l g DOI: 10.4172/2168-9296.1000101 e y C Cell & Developmental Biology ISSN: 2168-9296 Research Article Open Access The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom Abstract The larval transfer hypothesis states that larvae originated as adults in other taxa and their genomes were transferred by hybridization. It contests the view that larvae and corresponding adults evolved from common ancestors. The present paper reviews the life histories of chordates, and it interprets them in terms of the larval transfer hypothesis. It is the first paper to apply the hypothesis to craniates. I claim that the larvae of tunicates were acquired from adult larvaceans, the larvae of lampreys from adult cephalochordates, the larvae of lungfishes from adult craniate tadpoles, and the larvae of ray-finned fishes from other ray-finned fishes in different families. The occurrence of larvae in some fishes and their absence in others is correlated with reproductive behavior. Adult amphibians evolved from adult fishes, but larval amphibians did not evolve from either adult or larval fishes. I submit that [1] early amphibians had no larvae and that several families of urodeles and one subfamily of anurans have retained direct development, [2] the tadpole larvae of anurans and urodeles were acquired separately from different Mesozoic adult tadpoles, and [3] the post-tadpole larvae of salamanders were acquired from adults of other urodeles. Reptiles, birds and mammals probably evolved from amphibians that never acquired larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • A Safe and Efficient Technique for Handling Siren Spp. and Amphiuma
    Herpetological Review, 2009, 40(2), 169–170. © 2009 by Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles A Safe and Efficient Technique for Handling Siren spp. and Amphiuma spp. in the Field DONALD J. BROWN* and MICHAEL R. J. FORSTNER Department of Biology, Texas State University-San Marcos 601 University Drive, San Marcos, Texas 78666, USA e-mail (MRJF): [email protected] FIG. 1. Siren texana being restrained for measurements using a snake Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] tube. Siren spp. and Amphiuma spp. are large eel-like salamanders sary data on a given individual in under ten minutes. A potential distributed throughout the coastal plain of the southeastern United drawback of this method is that the salamanders will never be States (Conant and Collins 1998). Much has been reported on perfectly linear due to the necessity of having enough space to capture methods for these species. Common methods include min- facilitate movement into the tube. However, once an individual is now and crayfish traps (Sorensen 2004), hoop nets (Snodgrass et placed in a given tube, a smaller tube can be inserted at the anterior al. 1999), dip nets (Fauth and Resetarits 1991), and baited hooks end and the salamander can be coerced into it by touching its tail, (Hanlin 1978). Recently, a trap capable of sampling these species resulting in a tighter fit and more accurate measurements. The at depths up to 70 cm was developed (Luhring and Jennison 2008). handling method we used was effective for collecting standard Because of their slippery skin and irritable nature, Siren spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography and Scientific Name Index to Amphibians
    lb BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SCIENTIFIC NAME INDEX TO AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES IN THE PUBLICATIONS OF THE BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON BULLETIN 1-8, 1918-1988 AND PROCEEDINGS 1-100, 1882-1987 fi pp ERNEST A. LINER Houma, Louisiana SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE NO. 92 1992 SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE The SHIS series publishes and distributes translations, bibliographies, indices, and similar items judged useful to individuals interested in the biology of amphibians and reptiles, but unlikely to be published in the normal technical journals. Single copies are distributed free to interested individuals. Libraries, herpetological associations, and research laboratories are invited to exchange their publications with the Division of Amphibians and Reptiles. We wish to encourage individuals to share their bibliographies, translations, etc. with other herpetologists through the SHIS series. If you have such items please contact George Zug for instructions on preparation and submission. Contributors receive 50 free copies. Please address all requests for copies and inquiries to George Zug, Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20560 USA. Please include a self-addressed mailing label with requests. INTRODUCTION The present alphabetical listing by author (s) covers all papers bearing on herpetology that have appeared in Volume 1-100, 1882-1987, of the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington and the four numbers of the Bulletin series concerning reference to amphibians and reptiles. From Volume 1 through 82 (in part) , the articles were issued as separates with only the volume number, page numbers and year printed on each. Articles in Volume 82 (in part) through 89 were issued with volume number, article number, page numbers and year.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudoeurycea Naucampatepetl. the Cofre De Perote Salamander Is Endemic to the Sierra Madre Oriental of Eastern Mexico. This
    Pseudoeurycea naucampatepetl. The Cofre de Perote salamander is endemic to the Sierra Madre Oriental of eastern Mexico. This relatively large salamander (reported to attain a total length of 150 mm) is recorded only from, “a narrow ridge extending east from Cofre de Perote and terminating [on] a small peak (Cerro Volcancillo) at the type locality,” in central Veracruz, at elevations from 2,500 to 3,000 m (Amphibian Species of the World website). Pseudoeurycea naucampatepetl has been assigned to the P. bellii complex of the P. bellii group (Raffaëlli 2007) and is considered most closely related to P. gigantea, a species endemic to the La specimens and has not been seen for 20 years, despite thorough surveys in 2003 and 2004 (EDGE; www.edgeofexistence.org), and thus it might be extinct. The habitat at the type locality (pine-oak forest with abundant bunch grass) lies within Lower Montane Wet Forest (Wilson and Johnson 2010; IUCN Red List website [accessed 21 April 2013]). The known specimens were “found beneath the surface of roadside banks” (www.edgeofexistence.org) along the road to Las Lajas Microwave Station, 15 kilometers (by road) south of Highway 140 from Las Vigas, Veracruz (Amphibian Species of the World website). This species is terrestrial and presumed to reproduce by direct development. Pseudoeurycea naucampatepetl is placed as number 89 in the top 100 Evolutionarily Distinct and Globally Endangered amphib- ians (EDGE; www.edgeofexistence.org). We calculated this animal’s EVS as 17, which is in the middle of the high vulnerability category (see text for explanation), and its IUCN status has been assessed as Critically Endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri's Toads and Frogs Booklet
    TOADSMissouri’s andFROGS by Jeffrey T. Briggler and Tom R. Johnson, Herpetologists www.MissouriConservation.org © 1982, 2008 Missouri Conservation Commission Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Missouri Department of Conservation is available to all individuals without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability. Questions should be directed to the Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 180, Jefferson City, MO 65102, (573) 751-4115 (voice) or 800-735-2966 (TTY), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Federal Assistance, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Mail Stop: MBSP-4020, Arlington, VA 22203. Cover photo: Eastern gray treefrog by Tom R. Johnson issouri toads and frogs are colorful, harmless, vocal and valuable. Our forests, prairies, rivers, swamps and marshes are Mhome to a multitude of toads and frogs, but few people know how many varieties we have, how to tell them apart, or much about their natural history. Studying these animals and sharing their stories with fellow Missourians is one of the most pleasurable and rewarding aspects of our work. Toads and frogs are amphibians—a class Like most of vertebrate animals that also includes amphibians, salamanders and the tropical caecilians, which are long, slender, wormlike and legless. frogs and Missouri has 26 species and subspecies (or toads have geographic races) of toads and frogs. Toads and frogs differ from salamanders by having an aquatic relatively short bodies and lacking tails at adulthood. Being an amphibian means that tadpole stage they live two lives: an aquatic larval or tadpole and a semi- stage and a semi-aquatic or terrestrial adult stage.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist and Annotated Bibliography of the Subterranean Aquatic Fauna of Texas
    A CHECKLIST AND ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE SUBTERRANEAN AQUATIC FAUNA OF TEXAS JAMES R. REDDELL and ROBERT W. MITCHELL Texas Technological College WATER RESOURCES \ CENTER Lubbock, Texas WRC 69-6 INTERNATIONAL CENTER for ARID and August 1969 SEMI-ARID LAND STUDIES A CHECKLIST AND ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE SUBTERRANEAN AQUATIC FAUNA OF TEXAS James R. Reddell and Robert W. Mitchell Department of Biology Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas INTRODUCTION In view of the ever-increasing interest in all studies relating to the water resources of Texas, we have found it timely to prepare this guide to the fauna and biological literature of our subterranean waters. The value of such a guide has already been demonstrated by Clark (1966) in his "Publications, Personnel, and Government Organizations Related to the Limnology, Aquatic Biology and Ichthyology of the Inland Waters of Texas". This publication dea ls primarily with inland surface waters, however, barely touching upon the now rather extensive literature which has accumulated on the biology of our subterranean waters. To state a n obvious fact, it is imperative that our underground waters receive the attention due them. They are one of our most important resources. Those subterranean waters for which biological data exi st are very un­ equally distributed in the state. The best known are those which are acces­ sible to collection and study via the entrances of caves. Even in cavernous regions there exist inaccessible deep aquifers which have yielded little in­ formation as yet. Biological data from the underground waters of non-cave rn­ ous areas are virtually non-existant.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Study Plan
    F INAL REPORT Black Warrior Waterdog Field Survey and Habitat Assessment William Bacon Oliver Lake, Holt Dam Tailrace Tuscaloosa County, Alabama 13 February 2015 Prepared for ALABAMA POWER COMPANY By Mark A. Bailey CONSERVATION SOUTHEAST 7746 Boggan Level Road Andalusia, AL 36420 BLACK WARRIOR WATERDOG SURVEY, HOLT DAM TAILRACE Executive Summary Trapping and visual habitat surveys were conducted for the Black Warrior Waterdog (Necturus alabamensis) in the mouth and lowermost reach of Yellow Creek and the tailrace below Holt Dam. Fieldwork was conducted on 3 through 5 February 2015 by biologists Mark Bailey of Conservation Southeast and Chad Fitch of Alabama Power Company Environmental Affairs. The absence of leaf packs precluded dip-net surveys and 30 minnow traps baited with chicken livers were employed, 20 along the main river channel shore and 10 in Yellow Creek. After 60 trap-nights (990 trap-hours), no Black Warrior Waterdogs were captured. Habitat conditions were considered poor but not entirely unsuitable. Contributing to the poor conditions are heavy sedimentation in Yellow Creek and the altered Black Warrior River channel at what is now William Bacon Oliver Lake. I BLACK WARRIOR WATERDOG SURVEY, HOLT DAM TAILRACE Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... i Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 The Black Warrior Waterdog .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]