DOCSLIB.ORG

Peter John Hartman

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peter John Hartman Peter John Hartman Loyola University Chicago Crown Center, 3rd Floor Philosophy Department 1032 W. Sheridan Road [email protected] Chicago, IL 60660 http://phartman.sites.luc.edu/ Specialization: Medieval Philosophy Competence: Mind; Early Modern; Ancient; Metaphysics EDUCATION 2012. Ph.D., Collaborative Programme in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, Uni- versity of Toronto. 2005. M.A., Philosophy, University of Toronto. 2003. Honors B.A., Interdisciplinary Studies, Goshen College. EMPLOYMENT 2013–. Assistant Professor, Philosophy, Loyola University Chicago. 2012/13. Postdoc, Philosophy, Université du Québec à Montréal. Supervisor: Prof. Claude Panaccio (Canada Research Chair) 2011/12. Adjunct Professor, Philosophy, Fordham University. 1 Peter John Hartman Curriculum Vitae PUBLICATIONS Books [2018a, Forthcoming] Co-editor with G. Klima, P. Sobol & J. Zupko. Iohannis Buri- dani Quaestiones in libros tres Aristotelis ‘De anima’ // John Buridan’s Questions on the Three Books of Aristotle’s ‘De Anima’. Berlin: Springer. 2018a contains two sub-components: [2018b, Forthcoming] Editor & Translator. Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in libros tres ‘De anima’: Liber Primus // John Buridan’s Questions on the Three Books of Aristotle’s ‘De Anima’: Book One in 2018a. [2018c, Forthcoming] Co-author with G. Klima, P. Sobol & J. Zupko. “Introduc- tion” in 2018a. Articles *[2019, Forthcoming] “The Relation-Theory of Mental Acts: Durand of St.-Pourçain on the Ontological Status of Mental Acts.” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy accepted for publication on March 12, 2018. Expected publication 2019. *[2018d, Forthcoming] “Are Intellectual Habits in the Intellect? Durand of St.- Pourçain and Prosper de Reggio Emilia on the Location of Intellectual Habits.” In The Ontology, Psychology and Axiology of Habits (Habitus) in Medieval Philosophy. Eds. M. Roques & N. Faucher. Berlin: Springer. *[2017a] “Durand of St.-Pourçain on Cognitive Habits: Sent. Bk. 3, D. 23, QQ. 1– 2.” In The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy Eds. J. Pelletier & M. Roques. Berlin: Springer, pp. 331–368. [2017b] “Direct Realism with and without Representation: John Buridan and Durand of St.-Pourçain on ‘species’.” Questions on the Soul by John Buridan and Others, ed. G. Klima. Berlin: Springer, pp. 107–129. *[2014] “Cognition and Causation: Durand of St.-Pourçain and Godfrey of Fontaines on the Cause of a Cognitive Act.” In Durand of Saint-Pourçain and His Sentences Commentary: Historical, Philosophical, and Theological Issues. Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales. Bibliotheca 9. Eds. A. Speer, G. Guldentops & T. Jeschke, pp. 229–256. *[2013] “Durand of St.-Pourçain and Thomas Aquinas on Representation.” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 30.1, pp. 19–34. Under Review / In Progress: [2018e, In Progress] John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Transla- tion of Books 4 and 5. A collaborative book project with Joseph Stenberg, to be submitted to Cambridge University Press. [2018f, In Progress] “James of Viterbo and Durand of St.-Pourçain on Innate Ideas.” Approx. 10,000 words, expected to be submitted to a journal in 2018. 2 Peter John Hartman Curriculum Vitae CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS 2018. “Innate Ideas in James of Viterbo and Durand of St.-Pourçain.” Boulder Medieval Philosophy Conference. University of Colorado. 2018. Commentator for Christopher Tomaszewski’s “The Supplemented Soul: Thomistic Corruptionism and Mereology.” American Philosophical Association: Central Di- vision. 2017. “Medieval Nativism: James of Viterbo.” Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy. Fordham University. 2017. “Mental Acts: Some Late Medieval Accounts.” Cornell Summer Colloquium in Medieval Philosophy. 2017. “Mental Acts: John Duns Scotus’s Quodlibet 13.” St. Louis-Chicago Area Me- dieval Philosophy Working Group. 2017. Commentator for Philip Choi’s “Is John Buridan a Fallibilist?” American Philo- sophical Association: Central Division. 2016. “Thomism” for Colloquium on Catholic Intellectual Heritage. LUC. 2015. “Cognition and Causation: Ockham and Buridan on Mental Content.” History of Philosophy Workshop. LUC. 2015. Commentator for Prof. Antoine Cote’s “Peter Roger on Cognition.” University of Toronto Colloquium in Medieval Philosophy. 2015. “Cognitive Habits: 14th-Century Debates.” Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy. Fordham University. 2014. “Cognitive Habits in the 14th Century.” Phenomenology Research Group. LUC. 2014. “Collaborative Critical Editions: The John Buridan Project Workflow.” Sym- posium on Medieval and Renaissance Studies. St. Louis University. 2014. Reviewed. “Durand of St.-Pourçain and Prosper de Reggio Emilia on Cognitive Habits.” American Philosophical Association: Western Division. 2014. Commentator for Nathaniel Bulthuis’s “Walter Burley on Mental Language.” American Philosophical Association: Central Division. 2013. “The Location of Cognitive Habits.” Mind and Metaphysics. NEH Summer Semi- nar. Washington University at St. Louis. 2013. “Late Medieval Theories of Dispositions.” 8th Annual Montréal Workshop on Nominalism. 2012. “John Buridan and Durand on Perception and Representation.” John Buridan’s Questions on the Soul Conference. Fordham University. 3 Peter John Hartman Curriculum Vitae AWARDS 2018. Research Grant. Center for Catholic Intellectual Heritage with Prof. K. Irwin Project: Francisco Suárez and Jesuit Philosophy: conference/course. 2017. Funded Member. “All Things Ignatian: Catholic Intellectual Life and the Common Good.” Center for Catholic Intellectual Heritage Spring Semester Seminar, LUC. 2016. Fall Semester Paid Research Leave. LUC. 2014. Research Grant. Loyola University Chicago Summer Research Stipend Project: Peter of Palude Critical Edition. 2013. Funded Member. “Mind and Metaphysics.” NEH Summer Seminar with Prof. John Heil. Washington University at St. Louis. 2012/13. Post-doctoral Research Award. Canada Research Chair Program. Université du Québec à Montréal TEACHING EXPERIENCE Graduate-Level Directed Reading / Independent Study: 2017. J. Park, S.J., “Thomas Aquinas and Consciousness.” 2015. S. Molvarec, S.J., “Ludolph of Saxony and Ignatius Loyola.” Graduate Courses: 2017. PHIL406: Medieval Philosophy: Thomas Aquinas 2016. PHIL407: Medieval Philosophy: Themes in Skepticism 2015. PHIL407: Medieval Philosophy: Buridan’s Philosophy of Mind 2014. PHIL407: Medieval Philosophy: Mind & Metaphysics Undergraduate Courses: 2013–. PHIL130: Philosophy & Persons (3 sections per annum; on research leave Fall 2016) PhD and MA Committees: 2017–. J. Park, S.J., “Consciousness and Dualism.” (Ph.D. Philosophy) 2017–. J. Andrews, “Anselm and William Auxerre on Faith and Reason.” (Ph.D. Philosophy) 2016. R. Feder, “Maimonides and Spinoza on Biblical Interpretation.” (M.A. Philos- ophy) 2015. J. Clifford, “Incidental Perception and the Emergence of Archai.” (M.A. Phi- losophy) 2014. J. Roselle, S.J., “Courage, Exemplarism, and Christ: In Gethsemane and in Ministry.” (M.A. Social Philosophy) 2013–. J. Linn, “On Humilitas and Amor in Thomas Aquinas.” (Ph.D. Philosophy) 4 Peter John Hartman Curriculum Vitae SERVICE Service to Department: Phil. Dept. Committees: 2013–: Philosophy Club 2013–: Colloquia 2014–: Majors Program Assessment Data 2014–: Undergraduate Coordinating 2014–: Graduate Placement 2017: 88 Line Search 2017. Mock Job Interviews for Graduate Students, LUC. 2017. Presentation “How to Publish.” Professional Workshop for Graduate Students, LUC. 2014, 2015, 2017. Presentation “Emergent Technologies.” Professional Workshop for Graduate Students, LUC. Service to University: 2019. Co-Organizer. Conference “Francisco Suárez and Jesuit Philosophy.” 2017. Faculty Spring Semester Seminar Core Participant. “All Things Ignatian: Catholic Intellectual Life and the Common Good.” Center for Catholic Intellectual Heritage, LUC. 2017. Co-Organizer. Conference “Author Meets Critics: Prof. Blake Dutton’s Au- gustine and Academic Skepticism” (w/ Prof. Peter King, Prof. John Wynne, Prof. Emily Cain), LUC. 2015–. Core Member, Co-Founder. History of Philosophy Roundtable, LUC. 2014–. Core Member, Co-Founder. St. Louis-Chicago Area Medieval Philosophy Working Group. Service to Scholarly Community: 2016. Chair. “Colloquium: Medieval Philosophy.” American Philosophy Association: Pacific Division. 2014. Panel Co-organizer. “Collaborative Critical Editions.” Symposium on Medieval and Renaissance Studies. St. Louis University. Peer Reviewer: History of Philosophy Quarterly, Synthese, American Catholic Philosophi- cal Quarterly, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, Spontaneous Generation, British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Last updated: July 8, 2018. 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Scotus on Action for the Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy Of
    Scotus on Action for the Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy of Action The category of action Action is one of the ten categories. Scotus holds that the division of contingent being into the categories is both sufficient and immediate: sufficient in the sense that there are no other categories, and immediate in the sense that no two or more of the categories fall under some still more generic category.1 In arguing for the distinctness and irreducibility of action as a category, Scotus focuses on why action (along with its correlative category, passion) is not to be subsumed under the category of relation. One might suppose that there is nothing more to the action of, say, heating than the relation between the active power that causes heat and the passive recipient of that heat, but that would be a mistake. For one thing, even in the case of heating more is required for there to be an action than merely the relation between the agent and patient; there must also be something that actualizes the active power. More crucially, there are some actions that do not involve any relation. When an action remains within the agent, there is no relation to any passion, because the agent does not cause any passion.2 An action that remains within the agent is called an immanent action; one that “passes through” or “goes out from” the agent is called a transeunt action. Transeunt actions produce something – some form – in a patient; this form is called the terminus of the action. The terminus of a transeunt action, by contrast, is not a form produced by the action, but the object with which the action is concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • John Duns Scotus, Philosopher
    John Duns Scotus, Philosopher Proceedings of "The Quadruple Congress" on John Duns Scotus von Mary B Ingham, Oleg V Bychkov 1. Auflage John Duns Scotus, Philosopher – Ingham / Bychkov schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei beck-shop.de DIE FACHBUCHHANDLUNG Thematische Gliederung: Christliche Philosophie Aschendorff Verlag Münster 2010 Verlag C.H. Beck im Internet: www.beck.de ISBN 978 3 402 10213 8 Archa Verbi Subsidia, Vol. 3 Archa Verbi Yearbook for the Study of Medieval Theology Subsidia 3 Mary Beth Ingham and Oleg Bychkov (Eds) John Duns Scotus, Philosopher Proceedings of “The Quadruple Congress” on John Duns Scotus Part 1 Franciscan Institute Publications Archa Verbi Annuarium Societatis Internationalis pro Studiis Theologiae Medii Aevi promovendis Annuaire de la Société Internationale pour l‘Étude de la Théologie Médiévale Annuario della Società Internazionale per lo Studio della Teologia Medievale Anuario de la Sociedad Internacional para los Estudios de la Teología Medieval Jahrbuch der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Theologische Mediävistik Yearbook of the International Society for the Study of Medieval Theology Subsidia curator Riccardo Quinto Pavel Blažek Ursula Vones-Liebenstein directorium Societatis Volker Leppin praeses Societatis Bibliografi sche Information der Deutschen Bibliothek: Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografi e; detailliert bibliografi sche Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddb.de abrufbar. Library of Congress Control Number: 2010925581 Cover illustration:
    [Show full text]
  • Index Nominum
    Index Nominum Abualcasim, 50 Alfred of Sareshal, 319n Achillini, Alessandro, 179, 294–95 Algazali, 52n Adalbertus Ranconis de Ericinio, Ali, Ismail, 8n, 132 205n Alkindi, 304 Adam, 313 Allan, Mowbray, 276n Adam of Papenhoven, 222n Alne, Robert, 208n Adamson, Melitta Weiss, 136n Alonso, Manual, 46 Adenulf of Anagni, 301, 384 Alphonse of Poitiers, 193, 234 Adrian IV, pope, 108 Alverny, Marie-Thérèse d’, 35, 46, Afonso I Henriques, king of Portu- 50, 53n, 93, 147, 177, 264n, 303, gal, 35 308n Aimery, archdeacon of Tripoli, Alvicinus de Cremona, 368 105–6 Amadaeus VIII, duke of Savoy, Alberic of Trois Fontaines, 100–101 231 Albert de Robertis, bishop of Ambrose, 289 Tripoli, 106 Anastasius IV, pope, 108 Albert of Rizzato, patriarch of Anti- Anatoli, Jacob, 113 och, 73, 77n, 86–87, 105–6, 122, Andreas the Jew, 116 140 Andrew of Cornwall, 201n Albert of Schmidmüln, 215n, 269 Andrew of Sens, 199, 200–202 Albertus Magnus, 1, 174, 185, 191, Antonius de Colell, 268 194, 212n, 227, 229, 231, 245–48, Antweiler, Wolfgang, 70n, 74n, 77n, 250–51, 271, 284, 298, 303, 310, 105n, 106 315–16, 332 Aquinas, Thomas, 114, 256, 258, Albohali, 46, 53, 56 280n, 298, 315, 317 Albrecht I, duke of Austria, 254–55 Aratus, 41 Albumasar, 36, 45, 50, 55, 59, Aristippus, Henry, 91, 329 304 Arnald of Villanova, 1, 156, 229, 235, Alcabitius, 51, 56 267 Alderotti, Taddeo, 186 Arnaud of Verdale, 211n, 268 Alexander III, pope, 65, 150 Ashraf, al-, 139n Alexander IV, pope, 82 Augustine (of Hippo), 331 Alexander of Aphrodisias, 311, Augustine of Trent, 231 336–37 Aulus Gellius,
    [Show full text]
  • Readings in Western Religious Thought the Ancient World 1St Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    READINGS IN WESTERN RELIGIOUS THOUGHT THE ANCIENT WORLD 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Patrick Reid | 9780809128501 | | | | | Readings in Western Religious Thought The Ancient World 1st edition PDF Book For over two thousand years the Silk Road was a network of roads for the travel and dissemination of religious beliefs across Eurasia. The item may have some signs of cosmetic wear, but is fully operational and functions as intended. There will also be a focus on structured datasets stored in relational databases. Stanford University. We will then go on to look at the remains of then-new kingdoms of Urartu, Phrygia and Lydia, already in direct contact with archaic Greece, as well as the impact of the Achaemenid conquest, up to the Hellenistic period. Emphasis is on interaction between the states of southern Mesopotamia and their counterparts in both the Iranian lowlands Khuzestan and on the Iranian Plateau. What were the methods of translators? See also: I Ching's influence. This course will cover the grammar of Sumerian and introduce vocabulary and cuneiform signs, allowing students to work through more basic Sumerian texts over the course of the term and provide students the tools for approaching more advanced texts. Still, it is perhaps most useful not to think of medieval philosophy as defined by the chronological boundaries of its adjacent philosophical periods, but as beginning when thinkers first started to measure their philosophical speculations against the requirements of Christian doctrine and as ending when this was no longer the predominant practice. Be the first to write a review About this product.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric W. Hagedorn Curriculum Vitae
    Eric W. Hagedorn Curriculum Vitae Areas of Specialization: Medieval Philosophy Areas of Competence: Metaphysics; Early Modern Philosophy; Philosophy of Religion; Philosophy of Mind; Logic Employment St. Norbert College Associate Professor Philosophy (August 2018-Present) Assistant Professor of Philosophy (January 2014 – August 2018) Teaching Fellow of Philosophy (August 2012 – December 2013) Education University of Notre Dame Ph.D. in Philosophy (January 2013) M.A. in Philosophy (January 2008) Iowa State University B.S. with Honors in Computer Science and Philosophy (May 2004) Journal Articles and Book Chapters “Thomas Aquinas through the 1350s,” in The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Ethics, ed. Thomas Williams (forthcoming). “Ockham’s Scientia Argument for Mental Language,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 3 (2015): 145-168. "Is Anyone Else Thinking My Thoughts?: Aquinas's Response to the Too-Many Thinkers Problem," Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84 (2010): 275-86. Book Reviews Review of John Duns Scotus, On Being and Cognition: Ordinatio I.3, John van den Bercken (tr.) in International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion (forthcoming). Review of Claude Panaccio, Mental Language: From Plato to William of Ockham in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (August 2017). Review of Jari Kaukua and Tomas Ekenberg (eds.), Subjectivity and Selfhood in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (September 2016). Review of Sander W. de Boer, The Science of the Soul: The Commentary
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Aquinas and Francisco Suárez on Possible Being
    Th omas Aquinas and Francisco Suárez on Possible Being El ente posible en Tomás de Aquino y Francisco Suárez Victor Salas Sacred Heart Major Seminary, USA [email protected] Abstract: In this article I consider the problema- Resumen: En este artículo, considero la proble- tic that creation ex nihilo presents for Christian mática que la creación ex nihilo presenta para metaphysicans’ speculation regarding possible la especulación de los metafísicos cristianos con being. I explore Th omas Aquinas’s doctrine of respecto al ser posible. Exploro la doctrina de possibility and show that, while he attempts to la posibilidad de Tomás de Aquino y demues- remain faithful to a metaphysics of creation, en- tro que, mientras intenta permanecer fi el a una counters a metaphysical diffi cult when presen- metafísica de la creación, encuentra una difi cul- ting his account in terms of imitation. Suárez, tad metafísica cuando presenta su explicación I argue, is mindful of this diffi culty and off ers a en términos de imitación. Suárez, sostengo, es corrective that unites the approaches of Th omas consciente de esta difi cultad y ofrece una alter- Aquinas as well as that of Duns Scotus. In the nativa que une los enfoques de Tomás de Aqui- end, Suárez off ers an original account of pos- no y de Duns Escoto. Al fi nal, Suárez ofrece una sible being that is faithful to the demands of a versión original del ente posible que es fi el a las creation ex nihilo. demandas de una creación ex nihilo. Keywords: Possibility, Being, Creation ex nihilo, Palabras claves: Posibilidad, ente, creación ex Aquinas, Suárez.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2012 CAS Department of Philosophy Undergraduate Courses
    01/20/2012 Spring 2012 CAS Department of Philosophy Undergraduate Courses http://www.philosophy.buffalo.edu/courses PHI 101 BEE Intro. to Philosophy Beebe, J M 6:00pm - 8:40pm Cooke 121 13444 This course will introduce students to some of the basic questions and methods of philosophy. We will begin by looking at the birth of Western philosophy in ancient Greece. We will read three of Plato's dialogues and will learn about the life of Socrates, the first great Western philosopher. We will then wrestle with philosophical questions such as the following: What must one do to be truly happy? Are there absolute truths? Is truth relative? Is it ethically permissible to clone human beings? Is euthanasia morally permissible? How is the mind related to the brain? Is it anything more than the brain? Can computers think? Do humans have free will? If so, what is the nature of that freedom? Is it rational to believe in God? Is the existence of evil incompatible with the existence of a wholly good God? PHI 101 CHO Intro. to Philosophy Cho, K MWF 9:00am-9:50am O’Brian 109 15620 In addition to discussing the standardized introductory topics such as Reality, Knowledge, Ethics, Religion, Art, Mind and Body, based on the works of classical Western philosophers, the course is designed to make ourselves to be more critically inquisitive about what we normally take (in the Western world) for granted. For this purpose, a second textbook with sources from John Dewey and Confucius, is selected. Required texts: 1. R. Solomon, Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition, Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of the Virtues a Study of Thomas Aquinas’S and Godfrey of Fontaines’S Accounts of Moral Goodness
    Alexander Stöpfgeshoff The Structure of the Virtues A Study of Thomas Aquinas’s and Godfrey of Fontaines’s Accounts of Moral Goodness Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Sal VIII, Universitetshuset, Biskopsgatan 3, 753 10, Uppsala, Monday, 10 September 2018 at 14:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Professor Bonnie Kent (The Department of Philosophy, UC Irvine). Abstract Stöpfgeshoff, A. 2018. The Structure of the Virtues. A Study of Thomas Aquinas’s and Godfrey of Fontaines's Accounts of Moral Goodness. 173 pp. Uppsala: Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University. ISBN 978-91-506-2713-8. This dissertation is a study of Thomas Aquinas’s (1225–1274) and Godfrey of Fontaines’s (d. 1306) moral philosophies. In this study, I conduct a detailed analysis of two Aristotelian commitments concerning the character virtues, namely, The Plurality of the Character Virtues and The Connection of the Character Virtues. Both Aquinas and Godfrey think that there are many distinct character virtues (such as moderation and justice), however, one cannot (perfectly) possess these character virtues in separation from each other. In Chapter I, it is established that Aquinas believes in the plurality of the character virtues not because of a specific account of the human soul, but because he is committed to a plurality in what he calls “the notion of goodness.” In Chapter II, it is argued that Aquinas’s account of virtuous action requires that there be a likeness between a person and their actions in terms of the notion of goodness explored in Chapter I.
    [Show full text]
  • APA Eastern Division 2019 Annual Meeting Program
    The American Philosophical Association EASTERN DIVISION ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM SHERATON NEW YORK TIMES SQUARE NEW YORK, NEW YORK JANUARY 7 – 10, 2019 Visit our table at APA Eastern OFFERING A 20% (PB) / 40% (HC) DISCOUNT WITH FREE SHIPPING TO THE CONTIGUOUS U.S. FOR ORDERS PLACED AT THE CONFERENCE. THE POETRY OF APPROACHING HEGEL’S LOGIC, GEORGES BATAILLE OBLIQUELY Georges Bataille Melville, Molière, Beckett Translated and with an Introduction by Angelica Nuzzo Stuart Kendall THE POLITICS OF PARADIGMS ZHUANGZI AND THE Thomas S. Kuhn, James B. Conant, BECOMING OF NOTHINGNESS and the Cold War “Struggle for David Chai Men’s Minds” George A. Reisch ANOTHER AVAILABLE APRIL 2019 WHITE MAN’S BURDEN Josiah Royce’s Quest for a Philosophy THE REAL METAPHYSICAL CLUB of white Racial Empire The Philosophers, Their Debates, and Tommy J. Curry Selected Writings from 1870 to 1885 Frank X. Ryan, Brian E. Butler, and BOUNDARY LINES James A. Good, editors Philosophy and Postcolonialism Introduction by John R. Shook Emanuela Fornari AVAILABLE MARCH 2019 Translated by Iain Halliday Foreword by Étienne Balibar PRAGMATISM APPLIED William James and the Challenges THE CUDGEL AND THE CARESS of Contemporary Life Reflections on Cruelty and Tenderness Clifford S. Stagoll and David Farrell Krell Michael P. Levine, editors AVAILABLE MARCH 2019 AVAILABLE APRIL 2019 LOVE AND VIOLENCE BUDDHIST FEMINISMS The Vexatious Factors of Civilization AND FEMININITIES Lea Melandri Karma Lekshe Tsomo, editor Translated by Antonio Calcagno www.sunypress.edu II IMPORTANT NOTICES FOR MEETING ATTENDEES SESSION LOCATIONS Please note: this online version of the program does not include session locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Avicenna's Theory of Minima Naturalia Jon Mcginnis University of Missouri-St
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Philosophy Faculty Works Philosophy 1-2015 A Small Discovery: Avicenna's Theory of Minima Naturalia Jon McGinnis University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://irl.umsl.edu/philosophy-faculty Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation McGinnis, J. "A Small Discovery: Avicenna’s Theory of Minima Naturalia." Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 53 no. 1, 2015, pp. 1-24. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/hph.2015.0002 http://irl.umsl.edu/philosophy-faculty/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Small Discovery: Avicenna’s Theory of Minima Naturalia Jon McGinnis Journal of the History of Philosophy, Volume 53, Number 1, January 2015, pp. 1-24 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2015.0002 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/566924 Access provided by Missouri @ St Louis, Univ of (17 Feb 2017 19:06 GMT) A Small Discovery: Avicenna’s Theory of Minima Naturalia JON MCGINNIS* ABSTRACT There has been a long-held misconception among historians of philosophy and science that apart from brief comments in Aristotle and Averroes, the theory of minima naturalia had to await Latin Schoolmen for its full articulation. Recently scholars have shown that far from sporadic comments on minima naturalia, Averroes in fact had a fully developed and well-integrated theory of them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Defense of Intellectualism: Will, Intellect, and Control in Late Thirteenth-Century Philosophy
    A Defense of Intellectualism: Will, Intellect, and Control in Late Thirteenth-century Philosophy by Michael Szlachta A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy University of Toronto © Copyright by Michael Szlachta 2019 A Defense of Intellectualism: Will, Intellect, and Control in Late Thirteenth-century Philosophy Michael Szlachta Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy University of Toronto 2019 Abstract The question of whether our volitions are caused by the activity of our cognitive powers was the subject of tremendous controversy for medieval philosophers. By answering in the affirmative, Thomas Aquinas, Thomas of Sutton and Godfrey of Fontaines, the so-called intellectualists, face what I call the Problem of Control. If my wanting some object is caused by my apprehending it as good through some cognitive act, then it seems that I am not able to will otherwise than I do. For to will otherwise than I do, it would be necessary that I apprehend some other object as good. If, however, I am not able to will otherwise than I do, then I do not seem to have control over my actions. But if I do not have control over my actions, then I do not act freely, since having control over one’s actions is necessary for acting freely. My dissertation addresses the Problem of Control. I first argue that Thomas Aquinas’s notion of “perfect cognition of the end” gives the intellectualists the resources to explain how a human being has control over her actions. Second, I argue that Aquinas does not adequately explain a central feature of his intellectualism, namely, how the will “moves itself” to the exercise of its act, and discuss how the “self-motion” of the will is addressed by Thomas of Sutton and Godfrey of Fontaines.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 JOHN HEIL, from an Ontological Point of View, Oxford
    JOHN HEIL, From an Ontological Point of View, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003, xv + 267 pp, $45.00 cloth, ISBN 0-19-925974-7. Reviewed by ACHILLE C. VARZI, Department of Philosophy, Columbia Uni- versity, New York NY 10027, USA [Final version published in Philosophical Books 47:2 (2006), 148–154] This book has three messages to offer. The first is metaphilosophical, and is clearly stated at the beginning: honest philosophy requires “what the Austra- lians call ontological seriousness” (p. 2). The second is methodological: the idea that the character of reality can be ‘read off’ our linguistic representations of it—or our suitably regimented linguistic representations—is both wrong and pernicious. Among other things, it is responsible for the pervasive ten- dency to posit different levels of being, which in turn generates a myriad of philosophical puzzles that on closer look are just “puzzles of our own making” (p. 8). Finally, the third message is strictly philosophical and involves a de- tailed articulation and defence of Heil’s own serious, one-level ontology, the central ingredients of which are properties, understood as ways particular ob- jects are, and objects, understood as things that are various ways. Heil argues that this view fits well with what we have learned or might learn from the em- pirical sciences as well as with ordinary canons of plausibility. He then pro- ceeds to apply the view to a number of topics that feature prominently in cur- rent philosophical literature, such as identity, colour, intentionality, and con- sciousness. Concerning the first message, there is not much one can say.
    [Show full text]