DOCSLIB.ORG

APA Eastern Division 2019 Annual Meeting Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APA Eastern Division 2019 Annual Meeting Program The American Philosophical Association EASTERN DIVISION ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM SHERATON NEW YORK TIMES SQUARE NEW YORK, NEW YORK JANUARY 7 – 10, 2019 Visit our table at APA Eastern OFFERING A 20% (PB) / 40% (HC) DISCOUNT WITH FREE SHIPPING TO THE CONTIGUOUS U.S. FOR ORDERS PLACED AT THE CONFERENCE. THE POETRY OF APPROACHING HEGEL’S LOGIC, GEORGES BATAILLE OBLIQUELY Georges Bataille Melville, Molière, Beckett Translated and with an Introduction by Angelica Nuzzo Stuart Kendall THE POLITICS OF PARADIGMS ZHUANGZI AND THE Thomas S. Kuhn, James B. Conant, BECOMING OF NOTHINGNESS and the Cold War “Struggle for David Chai Men’s Minds” George A. Reisch ANOTHER AVAILABLE APRIL 2019 WHITE MAN’S BURDEN Josiah Royce’s Quest for a Philosophy THE REAL METAPHYSICAL CLUB of white Racial Empire The Philosophers, Their Debates, and Tommy J. Curry Selected Writings from 1870 to 1885 Frank X. Ryan, Brian E. Butler, and BOUNDARY LINES James A. Good, editors Philosophy and Postcolonialism Introduction by John R. Shook Emanuela Fornari AVAILABLE MARCH 2019 Translated by Iain Halliday Foreword by Étienne Balibar PRAGMATISM APPLIED William James and the Challenges THE CUDGEL AND THE CARESS of Contemporary Life Reflections on Cruelty and Tenderness Clifford S. Stagoll and David Farrell Krell Michael P. Levine, editors AVAILABLE MARCH 2019 AVAILABLE APRIL 2019 LOVE AND VIOLENCE BUDDHIST FEMINISMS The Vexatious Factors of Civilization AND FEMININITIES Lea Melandri Karma Lekshe Tsomo, editor Translated by Antonio Calcagno www.sunypress.edu II IMPORTANT NOTICES FOR MEETING ATTENDEES SESSION LOCATIONS Please note: this online version of the program does not include session locations. The locations of all individual sessions will be included in the paper program that you will receive when you pick up your registration materials at the meeting (if you opted to receive a paper program) as well as in the meeting app beginning the first day of the meeting. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT REGISTRATION Please note: it costs $50 less to register in advance than to register at the meeting. Early bird registration at www.apaonline.org is available until December 20 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Online registration will be closed from December 21 through January 6. Beginning on January 7, registration will reopen, and you may register online or at the meeting registration desk. PRONOUN STICKERS As a show of the APA’s commitment to diversity and inclusion, we will provide pronoun stickers for your name badge, including blank stickers that will allow you to use a pronoun of your own choosing. Stickers will be available for pickup at registration and can easily be worn as a show of solidarity, and a means of making our annual conference a friendly and safe environment for all. GENDER-NEUTRAL BATHROOMS AND QUIET ROOM Gender-neutral bathrooms and a quiet room will be available at the Sheraton New York Times Square. A key for the quiet room is available at the registration desk. 1 Special Events PUBLIC SESSIONS: “ASK A PHILOSOPHER” BOOTH Each day during the meeting, Ian Olasov will host an “Ask a Philosopher” booth at the Turnstyle Underground Market (located near the Columbus Circle subway station at 58th Street and 8th Avenue). To volunteer at the booth, contact Ian Olasov ([email protected]). Monday, January 7, 11:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m. Tuesday, January 8, 11:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m. Wednesday, January 9, 11:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m. Thursday, January 10, 11:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, January 7, 1:00–6:00 p.m. APA-AAPT TEACHING HUB Tuesday, January 8, 9:00 a.m.–9:30 p.m. Wednesday, January 9, 9:00 a.m.–10:00 p.m. POSTER SESSIONS Tuesday, January 8, 11:00 a.m.–1:30 p.m. Wednesday, January 9, 11:00 a.m.–1:30 p.m. DIVERSITY INSTITUTE ADVISORY PANEL Invited participants only. Tuesday, January 8, 12:00–2:00 p.m. PRIZE RECEPTION Tuesday, January 8, 5:00–6:00 p.m. RECEPTION Tuesday, January 8, 9:00–11:30 p.m. BUSINESS MEETING Wednesday, January 9, 11:15 a.m.–12:15 p.m. PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Wednesday, January 9, 4:45–7:00 p.m. RECEPTION Wednesday, January 9, 9:00–11:30 p.m. 2 2019 Program Committee Ted Sider, Chair (2019) Jeff Dunn, ex officio Brad Cokelet (2019) Antonia LoLordo (2019) Max Pensky (2019) Amy Allen (2020) Otávio Bueno (2020) Scott MacDonald (2020) Jorge Garcia (2020) John Lysaker (2020) Steven Gross (2020) Andrea Pitts (2020) Rachel Singpurwalla (2020) Jose Medina (2020) Japa Pallikkathayil (2019) Robin James (2019) Patricia Blanchette (2020) John Murungi (2020) Erik Wielenberg (2019) G. J. Postema (2019) Carol Hay (2020) Karen Bennett (2019) Sarah Moss (2019) Chris Haufe (2020) Susanna Siegel (2020) 3 The AAPT-APA Teaching Hub The American Association of Philosophy Teachers (AAPT) and the American Philosophical Association Committee on the Teaching of Philosophy (CTP) have co- organized a two-day conference on teaching for the 2019 Eastern Division meeting. We are aiming to bring the collegial and supportive culture of the AAPT to the APA; highlight teaching within the context of an APA meeting; stretch beyond the traditional APA session format to offer sessions that model active learning; and attract a broader range of philosophers to the divisional meetings. TUESDAY, JANUARY 8 M1 Welcome and STEM Collaborations in the Philosophy Classroom 9:00 a.m.–Noon Organizer and Chair: Robin Zebrowski (Beloit College) Presenters: Elizabeth Edenberg (Georgetown University) and August Gorman (Georgetown University) “Integrating Ethics into STEM Classrooms” Sara Gavrell (Universidad de Puerto Rico) “Philosophy of Technology, Birthing Ethics, and Engineering” James Ladyman (University of Bristol) “Philosophy of Science in Science Education: A Case Study of Collaboration” Johnathan Flowers (Worcester State University) “Algorithmic Bias and the “Objectivity” of Code: Pragmatist and Phenomenological Approaches to IT Ethics Pedagogy” Barbara Stock (Gallaudet University) and David Snyder (Gallaudet University) “Science Fiction PhilosoPhysics” Coffee and tea will be served. 4 The AAPT-APA Teaching Hub M2 Teaching Philosophy at a Two-Year College: Keys to Successfully Finding and Keeping a Job Arranged by the APA Committee on Philosophy in Two-Year Colleges. Co-sponsored by the APA Committee on Teaching Philosophy and the APA Committee on Academic Careers and Placement Noon–2:00 p.m. Organizer and Chair: Richard Legum (Kingsborough Community College, CUNY) Presenters: Aaron Champene (St. Louis Community College) Timothy Davis (The Community College of Baltimore County) Rick Repetti (Kingsborough Community College, CUNY) Mark Thornsby (Lone Star College) Thomas Urban (Emeritus, Houston Community College) M3 AAPT Workshop: Evaluating Inclusion in Course Design and Syllabi 2:00–5:00 p.m. In this interactive workshop, Kelly Burns (Dominican University), editor of the Studies in Pedagogy volume on inclusive pedagogies, and expert on managing microaggressions in the classroom, will introduce participants to a tool used to measure whether course syllabi are inclusive. Participants will learn how to create diverse assignments and assessments, and the concept of the “hidden curriculum” will be discussed. M4 What’s the Value of Pre-college Philosophy? Views from Facilitators and Teachers Arranged by the APA Committee on Pre-College Instruction in Philosophy 5:15–7:15 p.m. Organizers: Wendy C. Turgeon (St. Joseph’s College, NY) and Sara Goering (University of Washington) Chair: John Torrey (Buffalo State College, SUNY) Presenters: Chad Miller (University of Hawaii at Manoa) “The Value of Pre-college Philosophy” Joseph Biehl (Gotham Philosophical Society) “The Value of Pre-college Philosophy Programming within Cities” Wendy Way (Bethpage High School) “Notes from the Front: Teaching Philosophy in High School” 5 The AAPT-APA Teaching Hub Wendy C. Turgeon (St. Joseph’s College, NY) “Philosophy Is for Adults! Responding to the Challengers” Cora Drozd (Texas A&M University) “A Student Viewpoint” M5 PLATO Session: New Approaches to Teaching K–12 Philosophy 7:30–9:30 p.m. Chair: Wendy C. Turgeon (St. Joseph’s College, NY) Presenters: Mitch Green (University of Connecticut) “Dual-Enrollment Programs and Philosophy in High Schools: The Connecticut Model” Karen Rezach (The Ethics Institute at Kent Place School) “Empowering an Ethical Life: The Bioethics Project” Allison Cohen (American University and Langley High School, Virginia) “Ethics across the High School Curriculum: Ethics Bowl as Pedagogy” WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 9 M6 Introducing Students to Philosophy: New Approaches 9:00 a.m.–Noon Organizer: Karl Aho (Tarleton State University) Chair: Alexandra Bradner (Kenyon College) Presenters: Chris Brooks (University of New Hampshire Durham) Kelli Braley (Souhegan High School), and students (Souhegan High School) “Introducing ‘HYPE’: Hosting Young Philosophy Enthusiasts” Rebecca Millsop (University of Rhode Island) “Successfully Engaging Gen-Ed Ethics Students in Philosophical Argumentation and Dialogue” Asia Ferrin (American University) “Taking on Others’ Perspectives: Bubble Hopping in the Philosophy Classroom” Coffee and tea will be served. 6 The AAPT-APA Teaching Hub M7 Table Talk: Experiential Learning in Philosophy 12:15–1:15 p.m. Experts in high-impact/engaged learning moderate 30-minute roundtable discussions of best practices. Choose one discussion and then switch after 30 minutes to another. Chair: Jayme Kerr (George Washington University) Presenters: Ramona Ilea (Pacific University) and Monica Janzen (Anoka-Ramsey Community College) “Experiments in Ethics: Scaffolded, Small Scale, Student Designed Activities in Ethics” Julinna Oxley (Coastal Carolina University) “Hurricanes and Philosophy: When EL Isn’t What You Thought It Would Be” Andrew Winters (Yavapai College) “Taking It Outside: Teaching Philosophy in the Community” M8 Teaching Core Texts: The Gettier Problem 1:30–4:30 p.m. Organizer and Chair: Russell Marcus (Hamilton College) Presenters: Derek Anderson (Boston University) “Should We Be Teaching Gettier?” Kenneth Boyd (University of Toronto at Scarborough) “Gettier and Metaphilosophy: Intuitions and Empirical Approaches in Epistemology” Aaron Champene (St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 on Reasonable Hope Dana Howard Prepared for the Political Theory
    On Reasonable Hope Dana Howard Prepared for the Political Theory Workshop Ohio State University Abstract: John Rawls has argued that one of the aims of a theory of justice is to offer us reasonable hope for a just future. But what makes hope reasonable? And is it misguided to think that reasonable hope is a proper aim of political philosophy? In this paper, I trace the development of Rawls’s conception of reasonable hope by looking more closely at his treatment of Immanuel Kant’s conceptions of Reasonable Faith and of philosophy as Apologia. The idea of reasonable hope goes beyond the weaker kind of “reconciliation” put forward by Rousseau’s account of a conjectural history. It is one thing to believe, with Rousseau, that our deep natures are not incompatible with the possibility of a just society. It is something further to harbor any hope for this in the future. I argue that this temporal aspect, which is built into what Kant and Rawls mean by reasonable hope, is a useful approach to the practice of political philosophy. An approach that takes the need for reasonable hope seriously is one that moves political theorizing from a more passive framework of theoretical imagination toward a more active one that entails political anticipation. 1 John Rawls asserts that political philosophy ought to be realistically utopian; that is, it ought to extend what we ordinarily take to be “the limits of practical political possibility.”1 On his view, a realistic utopia makes us aware of certain available political and social alternatives that we may have previously thought impossible given our non-ideal circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis 2.0., Hokkanen
    Distorted imaginaries in a world of crisis - A world-ecological analysis of the imaginaries at the root of United Nations’ climate responses Saana Hokkanen University of Helsinki Global Development Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences Master’s thesis November, 2020 Tiedekunta – Fakultet – Faculty Koulutusohjelma – Utbildingsprogram – Degree Programme Faculty of Social Sciences Master’s Programme in Society and Change Tekijä – Författare – Author Saana Maarit Hokkanen Työn nimi – Arbetets titel – Title Distorted imaginaries in a world of crisis – a world-ecological analysis of the imaginaries at the root of United Nations climate responses Oppiaine/Opintosuunta – Läroämne/Studieinriktning – Subject/Study track Global Development Studies Työn laji – Arbetets art – Level Aika – Datum – Month and year Sivumäärä – Sidoantal – Number of pages Master’s thesis November, 2020 67 + references Tiivistelmä – Referat – Abstract The earth and all of its inhabitants are currently on a trajectory of multiple cascading global crises, which threaten the existence of all beings and the complex relations, which enable the functioning of all societies. In addition to posing a physical threat to human and non-human existence, the climate emergency also poses a conceptual and an ontological challenge. Therefore, this thesis focuses on the institutionalized and globalized ontological assumptions (or imaginaries) at the core of the current world-system (/ecology) characterized by capitalism. One of the main arguments in this thesis is that the perpetuation of the core imaginaries (namely those of Society and Nature’s dualism, mechanistic image of the world and hierarchical existence) at the root of current global structures, as well as the international climate responses, has led to inadequate and misinformed responses to the emergency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Onlife Manifesto Luciano Floridi Editor
    The Onlife Manifesto Luciano Floridi Editor The Onlife Manifesto Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era Editor Luciano Floridi Oxford Internet Institute University of Oxford Oxford, Oxfordshire United Kingdom Image made from models used to track debris in Earth orbit. Of the approximately 19,000 man-made objects larger than 10 centimetres in Earth orbit as of July 2009, most orbit close to the Earth. Source: NASA Earth Observatory / Orbital Debris Program Office: http://commons. wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Space_Debris_Low_Earth_Orbit.png original publication date 12 September 2009. ISBN 978-3-319-04092-9 ISBN 978-3-319-04093-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014948552 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2015. The book is published with open access at SpringerLink.com Open Access This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncom- mercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. This work is subject to copyright. All commercial rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publica- tion does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • 4​Th​ MINDING ANIMALS CONFERENCE CIUDAD DE
    th 4 ​ MINDING ANIMALS CONFERENCE ​ CIUDAD DE MÉXICO, 17 TO 24 JANUARY, 2018 SOCIAL PROGRAMME: ROYAL PEDREGAL HOTEL ACADEMIC PROGRAMME: NATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO Auditorio Alfonso Caso and Anexos de la Facultad de Derecho FINAL PROGRAMME (Online version linked to abstracts. Download PDF here) 1/47 All delegates please note: ​ 1. Presentation slots may have needed to be moved by the organisers, and may appear in a different place from that of the final printed programme. Please consult the schedule located in the Conference Programme upon arrival at the Conference for your presentation time. 2. Please note that presenters have to ensure the following times for presentation to allow for adequate time for questions from the floor and smooth transition of sessions. Delegates must not stray from their allocated 20 minutes. Further, delegates are welcome to move within sessions, therefore presenters MUST limit their talk to the allocated time. Therefore, Q&A will be AFTER each talk, and NOT at the end of the three presentations. Plenary and Invited Talks – 45 min. presentation and 15 min. discussion (Q&A). 3. For panels, each panellist must stick strictly to a 10 minute time frame, before discussion with the floor commences. 4. Note that co-authors may be presenting at the conference in place of, or with the main author. For all co-authors, delegates are advised to consult the Conference Abstracts link on the Minding Animals website. Use of the term et al is provided where there is more than two authors ​ ​ of an abstract. 5. Moderator notes will be available at all front desks in tutorial rooms, along with Time Sheets (5, 3 and 1 minute Left).
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Daniel Dennett on Free Will Skepticism Derk Pereboom(Α)
    RIVISTA INTERNAZIONALE DI FILOSOFIA E PSICOLOGIA ISSN 2039-4667; E-ISSN 2239-2629 DOI: 10.4453/rifp.2017.0021 Vol. 8 (2017), n. 3, pp. 259-265 STUDI Response to Daniel Dennett on Free Will Skepticism Derk Pereboom(α) Ricevuto: 17 febbraio 2017; accettato: 24 agosto 2017 █ Abstract What is at stake in the debate between those, such as Sam Harris and me, who contend that we would lack free will on the supposition that we are causally determined agents, and those that defend the claim that we might then retain free will, such as Daniel Dennett? I agree with Dennett that on the suppo- sition of causal determination there would be robust ways in which we could shape, control, and cause our actions. But I deny that on this supposition we would have the control in action required for us to basical- ly deserve to be blamed, praised, punished or rewarded. In this response, I argue that this is the core issue that divides compatibilists and incompatiblists about free will and causal determination, and that the in- compatibilist position is the right one to accept. KEYWORDS: Sam Harris; Daniel Dennett; Free Will Skepticism; Compatibilism; Incompatibilism █ Riassunto Risposta a Daniel Dennett sullo scetticismo circa il libero arbitrio – Qual è la posta in gioco nel dibattito che vede contrapporsi chi – come Sam Harris e me – sostiene che non avremmo libertà di volere sulla scorta dell’ipotesi per cui siamo agenti causalmente determinati e chi, al contrario – come Daniel Den- nett – difende l’idea che possa darsi un libero volere? Concordo con Dennett circa il fatto che, anche nell’ipotesi della determinazione causale, resterebbe lo spazio per sostenere che per vari e importanti aspetti saremmo comunque noi a modellare, controllare e causare le nostre azioni.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Reconstruction: Pragmatism and the More-Than-Human Community
    A Thesis entitled Ecological Reconstruction: Pragmatism and the More-Than-Human Community by Matthew S. Bower Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy ________________________________________ Dr. James Campbell, Committee Chair ________________________________________ Dr. Ashley Pryor, Committee Member ________________________________________ Dr. Ammon Allred, Committee Member ________________________________________ Dr. Patricia Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2010 An Abstract of Ecological Reconstruction: Pragmatism and the More-Than-Human Community by Matthew S. Bower As partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy The University of Toledo May 2010 Ecological reconstruction challenges the historical chasm between culture and nature by using the normative implications of ecology to assert a primacy of relations in experience. Drawing upon the framework of John Dewey and classical American Pragmatism, I sketch out an experimental method for thinking about environmental philosophy that follows this reconstruction, moving beyond both applied ethics and dogmatic values. Central to this move is the possibility of opening up ecotonal spaces, literal and theoretical cites of intensified interaction between cultural and natural systems. These spaces furnish reconstruction with the experiences necessary to generate new concepts that set human communities on the course towards greater ecological attentiveness. iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my committee for their wisdom and guidance, my family for all of their support, and everyone who has ever joined me for a walk in the woods. I am grateful to have been introduced at such a young age to the necessity of the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • The Religious Naturalism of William James: a New Interpretation Through the Lens of Liberal Naturalism
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Bunzl, Jacob Herbert (2019) The Religious Naturalism of William James: A New Interpretation Through the Lens of Liberal Naturalism. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent,. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/81750/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html 1 The Religious Naturalism of William James A New Interpretation Through the Lens of ‘Liberal Naturalism’ Jacob Herbert Bunzl Abstract: This thesis argues that recent developments in philosophical naturalism mandate a new naturalistic reading of James. To that end, it presents the first comprehensive reading of James through the lens of liberal rather than scientific naturalism. Chapter 1 offers an extensive survey of the varieties of philosophical naturalism that provides the conceptual tools required for the rest the thesis, and allows us to provisionally locate James within the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiina Rosenberg
    Don ’t be Quiet TIINA ROSENBERG , Don’ ,t be Quiet ESSAYS ON FEMINISM AND PERFORMANCE Don’t Be Quiet, Start a Riot! Essays on Feminism and Performance Tiina Rosenberg Published by Stockholm University Press Stockholm University SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden www.stockholmuniversitypress.se Text © Tiina Rosenberg 2016 License CC-BY ORCID: Tiina Rosenberg: 0000-0002-7012-2543 Supporting Agency (funding): The Swedish Research Council First published 2016 Cover Illustration: Le nozze di Figaro (W.A. Mozart). Johanna Rudström (Cherubino) and Susanna Stern (Countess Almaviva), Royal Opera, Stockholm, 2015. Photographer: Mats Bäcker. Cover designed by Karl Edqvist, SUP Stockholm Studies in Culture and Aesthetics (Online) ISSN: 2002-3227 ISBN (Paperback): 978-91-7635-023-2 ISBN (PDF): 978-91-7635-020-1 ISBN (EPUB): 978-91-7635-021-8 ISBN (Kindle): 978-91-7635-022-5 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16993/baf This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. This license allows for copying any part of the work for personal and commercial use, providing author attribution is clearly stated. Suggested citation: Rosenberg, Tiina 2016 Don’t Be Quiet, Start a Riot! Essays on Feminism and Performance. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press. DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.16993/baf. License CC-BY 4.0 To read the free, open access version of this book online, visit http://dx.doi.org/10.16993/baf or scan this QR code with your mobile device.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics and Animals Fall 2020
    Ethics and Animals Fall 2020 Description This course examines the morality of our treatment of nonhuman animals. We start with a survey of moral theory. Do animals have moral status? Do we have a right to harm or kill some animals in order to benefit or save others? We consider these questions from a variety of moral perspectives, including consequentialism, Kantian ethics, virtue ethics, and feminist ethics. We then apply these ideas to different kinds of animal use. For example, what is the morality of our treatment of animals in food, research, captivity, and the wild? Finally, we will explore ethical questions that arise for animal activists, including about what ends they should pursue, what means they should take towards those ends, and how they should relate to other social movements. General Information Time: T 5:00{7:30 ET Place: online Instructor: Name: Jeff Sebo Email: jeff[email protected] Office: online Office Hours: M 3-5pm ET 1 Readings The required books for this class are: Julia Driver, Ethics: The Fundamentals; Lori Gruen, Ethics and Animals; and Gary Francione & Robert Garner, The Animal Rights Debate. These books are available online, and the Gruen and Francione & Garner books are also available for free at the NYU library website. All readings not from the required books will be posted on the course website. Grading Your grades will be determined as follows: • Papers (75%): You will write three papers explaining and evaluating the ideas and arguments discussed in class. You will email this paper to [email protected]. For each paper, you can either create your own prompt (provided that you clear it with us in advance) or select from prompts that we create.
    [Show full text]
  • Compassion and Sympathy As Moral Motivation Moral Philosophy Has Long Taken an Interest in the Emotions
    Compassion and Sympathy as Moral Motivation Moral philosophy has long taken an interest in the emotions. Ever since Plato’s defense of the primacy of reason as a source of motiva- tion, moral philosophers have debated the proper role of emotion in the character of a good person and in the choice of individual actions. There are striking contrasts that can be drawn among the main tradi- tions in moral philosophy as to the role they assign to the emotions, and to the particular emotions that they evaluate positively and nega- tively. Here are some examples. Utilitarianism is often presented as a the- ory which simply articulates an ideal of sympathy, where the morally right action is the one that would be favored by someone who is equally sympathetic to the pleasure and pains of all sentient beings. And, on another level, utilitarianism tends to evaluate highly actions motivated by sympathy and compassion, and to evaluate negatively actions motivated by malice and spite. Kantianism (or deontology, as it is often called) has a completely different structure and, conse- quently, a different attitude towards the emotions. It conceives of morality as the self-imposed laws of rational agents, and no emotion is thought to be involved in the generation of these laws. It is true that Kant himself does find a special role for the emotion—if that is the right word—of respect for rational agents and for the laws they impose on themselves. But Kant seems to regard respect as a sort of effect within us of our own inscrutable moral freedom, and not as the source of moral legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon Dilek Huseyinzadegan Emory University, [email protected]
    Feminist Philosophy Quarterly Volume 4 | Issue 1 Article 3 2018 For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon Dilek Huseyinzadegan Emory University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fpq Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, European History Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Huseyinzadegan, Dilek. 2018. "For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon." Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4, (1). Article 3. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fpq/vol4/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Feminist Philosophy Quarterly by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Huseyinzadegan: For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon Dilek Huseyinzadegan Abstract As feminist scholars, we hope that our own work is exempt from structural problems such as racism, sexism, and Eurocentrism, that is, the kind of problems that are exemplified and enacted by Kant’s works. In other words, we hope that we do not re-enact, implicitly or explicitly, Kant’s problematic claims, which range from the unnaturalness of a female philosopher, “who might as well have a beard,” the stupid things that a black carpenter said “because he was black from head to foot,” the poor women “living in the greatest slavery in the Orient,” to the “sheep-like existence of the inhabitants of Tahiti.” In this piece, I argue that we cannot simply hope to avoid these problems unless we are vigilant about incorporating the full picture of Kant’s and Kantian philosophy into our feminist appropriations.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric W. Hagedorn Curriculum Vitae
    Eric W. Hagedorn Curriculum Vitae Areas of Specialization: Medieval Philosophy Areas of Competence: Metaphysics; Early Modern Philosophy; Philosophy of Religion; Philosophy of Mind; Logic Employment St. Norbert College Associate Professor Philosophy (August 2018-Present) Assistant Professor of Philosophy (January 2014 – August 2018) Teaching Fellow of Philosophy (August 2012 – December 2013) Education University of Notre Dame Ph.D. in Philosophy (January 2013) M.A. in Philosophy (January 2008) Iowa State University B.S. with Honors in Computer Science and Philosophy (May 2004) Journal Articles and Book Chapters “Thomas Aquinas through the 1350s,” in The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Ethics, ed. Thomas Williams (forthcoming). “Ockham’s Scientia Argument for Mental Language,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 3 (2015): 145-168. "Is Anyone Else Thinking My Thoughts?: Aquinas's Response to the Too-Many Thinkers Problem," Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84 (2010): 275-86. Book Reviews Review of John Duns Scotus, On Being and Cognition: Ordinatio I.3, John van den Bercken (tr.) in International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion (forthcoming). Review of Claude Panaccio, Mental Language: From Plato to William of Ockham in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (August 2017). Review of Jari Kaukua and Tomas Ekenberg (eds.), Subjectivity and Selfhood in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (September 2016). Review of Sander W. de Boer, The Science of the Soul: The Commentary
    [Show full text]