DOCSLIB.ORG

Brazil-United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Brazil-United States Judicial Dialogue Created in June 2006 as part of the Wilson Center’s Latin American Program, the BRAZIL INSTITUTE strives to foster informed dialogue on key issues important to Brazilians and to the Brazilian-U.S. relationship. We work to promote detailed analysis of Brazil’s public policy and advance Washington’s understanding of contemporary Brazilian developments, mindful of the long history that binds the two most populous democracies in the Americas. The Institute honors this history and attempts to further bilateral coop- eration by promoting informed dialogue between these two diverse and vibrant multiracial societies. Our activities include: convening policy forums to stimulate nonpartisan reflection and debate on critical issues related to Brazil; promoting, sponsoring, and disseminating research; par- ticipating in the broader effort to inform Americans about Brazil through lectures and interviews given by its director; appointing leading Brazilian and Brazilianist academics, journalists, and policy makers as Wilson Center Public Policy Scholars; and maintaining a comprehensive website devoted to news, analysis, research, and reference materials on Brazil. Paulo Sotero, Director Michael Darden, Program Assistant Anna Carolina Cardenas, Program Assistant Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 www.wilsoncenter.org/brazil ISBN: 978-1-938027-38-3 Brazil-United States Judicial Dialogue May 11 – 13, 2011 Brazil-United States Judicial Dialogue Foreword ffirming the Rule of Law in a historically unequal and unjust Asociety has been a central challenge in Brazil since the reinstate- ment of democracy in the mid-1980s. The evolving structure, role and effectiveness of the country’s judicial system have been major factors in that effort. Most experts would agree that progress has been and continues to be made. Evidence of advancements can be found, for example, in the establishment of small claims courts and the creation a supervisory National Council of Justice. In addition, the successful implementation of an electronic voting system under the supervision of a specialized federal court as well as the historic trial of the largest political corruption scandal in Brazil’s history by the nation’s Supreme Federal Tribunal are further evidence that the rule of law is taking root. An important ingredient of the continuous process of judicial reform in Brazil has been the openness of judges, prosecutors and legal scholars to exchange experiences with colleagues from abroad. Particularly relevant in that context have been interactions between Brazil and American judges and members of academia. In the spring of 2011 the Brazil Institute of the Wilson Center and the Law Library of the United States Library of Congress organized a high level conference consisting of experts from America’s two largest democracies in a comparative examination of their respective judicial systems. The Georgetown University Law Center participated as an institutional co-sponsor. Four members of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Tribunal came to Washington to exchange l iil Brazil-United States Judicial Dialogue experiences and views with American judges and legal scholars through a Brazil-United States Judicial Dialogue. The delegation was led by the Court’s President at the time, Minister Cesar Peluzo. He was joined by Minister Ellen Gracie Northfleet, the first woman to sit on Brazil’s highest court and a Former President of the Court, Minister Gilmar Mendes, also a former President of the Court, and Minister Ricardo Lewandoswki, who will be elevated to the presi- dency of the Federal Supreme Tribunal in April 2014 for a period of two years. The main event – a day and a half academic seminar - took place in the Member’s Room of the Library of Congress’ Thomas Jefferson Building. Participants made presentations and engaged in dialogue on topics ranging from controlling constitutionality and the process of judicial review to the challenges of administering courts. They also examined questions related to legitimacy, transparency and judicial security in decisions of the highest courts of Brazil and the U.S. and explored potential areas of collaboration on electoral justice. With Brazil’s Supreme Federal Tribunal about to hold an unprece- dented trial of vote buying in Congress [NOTE: In Brazil, the trial would actually be conducted by the STF], participating judges and scholars compared notes on the prosecution of politicians indicted of crimes of political corruption in both countries. An inaugural dinner offered by Brazil’s Ambassador to the United States, Mauro Vieira, at his official residence, brought together the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts, and his Brazilian counterpart, Cesar Peluzo. The Brazil-United States Judicial Dialogue of 2011 grew out of the pioneering work launched in the late 1990s by U.S. District Court Judge Peter J. Messitte, of the District of Maryland, which also brought together the judicial experiences of Brazil and the United States. A Peace Corps Volunteer in São Paulo in the 1960s, who has remained in close contact with Brazil since his time in Brazil, Judge l iiil Brazil-United States Judicial Dialogue Messitte organized the first exchanges in 1998, with support from the World Bank and the United States Agency for International Devel- opment. Two conferences were held under the 1998 Brazil-United States Law Initiative, the first in Baltimore and Washington, in July, and the second in Brasilia and Rio de Janeiro, in December. The present volume brings together fifteen contributions offered by the participants in the Brazil-United States Judicial Dialogue of May 2011. The texts are displayed in seven thematic chapters, according to the order in which they were presented, following the transcripts of remarks offered at the opening session by the Librarian of Congress James Billington, the President and Director of the Wilson Center Jane Harman, the Dean of the Georgetown Law Center William Treanor, and the then Law Librarian of Congress Roberta Shaffer. The topics covered include Constitutions, Fundamental Rights and Democracy - Role of Supreme Courts in the Western Hemisphere’s Two Largest Democracies; Controlling Constitutionality and the Process of Judicial Review - Legitimacy, Transparency and Judicial Security in Supreme Court Decisions; Challenges of Court Admin- istration; Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution: Conciliation and Mediation in Brazilian and American Law; Due Process of Law, Constitutional Guarantees and Appeals; Electoral Justice and Democracy - Potential Areas for Bilateral Cooperation; and Prosecuting and Trying Political Corruption Cases. The Embassy of Brazil in Washington, D.C. and the Georgetown Law Center were fully supportive of the Dialogue, as were four Brazilian and American law firms which co-sponsored the Dialogue: Mattos Filho Veiga Filho Marrey Jr. & Quiroga Advogados; Mattos Muriel Kestener Advogados; Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP; and Arnold and Porter LLP. The Initiative owes much to the efforts of Dr. João Batista Nasci- mento Magalhães, a diplomat who was, at the time, Adviser for l ivl Brazil-United States Judicial Dialogue International Affairs to the Brazilian Supreme Federal Tribunal; Rob- ert R. Newlen, Assistant Law Librarian of Congress for collections, outreach and services; Michael Darden, Brazil Institute Program Assistant; and Anna Carolina Cardenas, Brazil Institute Program Intern who contributed to this report. To them, and to participants and sponsors, our deepest gratitude. Paulo Sotero Director, Brazil Institute l v l Brazil-United States Judicial Dialogue Table of Contents Opening Remarks .................................................................1 Roberta Shaffer, Law Librarian of Congress ..................................1 Mauro Vieira, Ambassador of Brazil to the United States ...........2 James Billington, Librarian of Congress .........................................3 Jane Harman, Director, President and CEO, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.....................4 William Treanor, Dean, Georgetown University Law Center .....8 Constitution, Fundamental Rights and Democracy. The Role of Supreme Courts in the Western Hemisphere’s Two Largest Democracies .........................10 Cezar Peluso, President, Supreme Federal Tribunal of Brazil ...10 Diane Wood, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ..........................................................................20 Controlling Constitutionality and the Process of Judicial Review. Legitimacy, Transparency and Judicial Security in Supreme Court Decisions ..............................................34 Gilmar Mendes, Minister, Supreme Federal Tribunal of Brazil ...34 Jeffrey Minear, Counselor to Chief Justice, Supreme Court of the United Stats ...........................................................................45 The Challenges of Court Administration ..........................54 James Duff, Director, Administrative Office of the United States Courts ...........................................................................................54 l vil Brazil-United States Judicial Dialogue Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution: Conciliation and Mediation in Brazilian and American Law.................60 Morgana Richa, Minister, National Council of Justice of Brazil ................................................................................60
Recommended publications
  • Judges of the Ninth Circuit

    Judges of the Ninth Circuit

    Golden Gate University Law Review Volume 34 Article 2 Issue 1 Ninth Circuit Survey January 2004 Judges of the Ninth Circuit Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev Part of the Judges Commons, and the Legal Biography Commons Recommended Citation , Judges of the Ninth Circuit, 34 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. (2004). http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol34/iss1/2 This Introduction is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Golden Gate University Law Review by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. et al.: Judges of the Ninth Circuit JUDGES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT* CIDEF JunGE MARy M. SCHROEDER Chief Judge Mary M. Schroeder became Chief Judge of the Ninth Circuit Court on December 1, 2000 and is the first woman chief judge of the nation's largest judicial circuit. She is serving a seven-year term as Chief Judge. As Chief Judge, Judge Schroeder assumed the administrative responsibilities of both the court of appeals and the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit, a board of judges governing the region. President Carter appointed Judge Schroeder to the Ninth Circuit on September 25, 1979. Judge Schroeder graduated from Swarthmore College with a B.A. in 1962, and from the University of Chicago with a J.D. in 1965. At the University of Chicago, she was one of only six women in her law school class.
  • Suppuration of Powers: Abscam, Entrapment and the Politics of Expulsion Henry Biggs

    Suppuration of Powers: Abscam, Entrapment and the Politics of Expulsion Henry Biggs

    Legislation and Policy Brief Volume 6 | Issue 2 Article 2 2014 Suppuration of Powers: Abscam, Entrapment and the Politics of Expulsion Henry Biggs Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/lpb Part of the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Biggs, Henry. "Suppuration of Powers: Abscam, Entrapment and the Politics of Expulsion." Legislation and Policy Brief 6, no. 2 (2014): 249-269. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Legislation and Policy Brief by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vol. 6.2 Legislation & Policy Brief 249 SUPPURATION OF POWERS: ABSCAM, ENTRAPMENT AND THE POLITICS OF EXPULSION Henry Biggs1 In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously . to declare that the Government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal – would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this Court should resolutely set its face.2 Introduction .............................................................................................249 I. Abscam .................................................................................................251 A. Origins ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������251
  • Judicial Clerkship Handbook 2013

    Judicial Clerkship Handbook 2013

    Career Services Office | CLERKSHIPS JUDICIAL CLERKSHIP HANDBOOK 2013 - 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview of the Clerkship Program 2 Should I Seek a Clerkship? 3 Where Should I Apply to Clerk? 4 Type of Court 5 State Courts 5 Federal Courts 6 Federal District Court 7 Federal Appellate Court 7 Clerkships with Specialized Courts 8 Bankruptcy Courts 8 U.S. Magistrate Judges 8 U.S. Claims Court 9 U.S. Tax Court 9 Federal Circuit 9 U.S. Court of International Trade 9 U.S. Supreme Court 10 How Do I Apply for Clerkships? 11 Clerkship Application Materials 12 Cover Letter and Resume 13 Transcripts 14 Writing Sample 15 Letters of Recommendation 16 Envelopes and Labels 17 Step-by-Step Instructions 18 Clerkship Interviews, Offers and Acceptances 22 APPENDICES Appendix A: Timeline and Checklist Appendix B: USC Law School Graduates & Students with Clerkships Appendix C: USC Faculty Who Clerked Appendix D: California State Court Hiring Practices Appendix E: Optional Recommender Questionnaire Appendix F: Resources for Researching Judges and Courts Appendix G: Loan Repayment Assistance Program Appendix H: Supplemental Readings Appendix I: Sample Cover Letters Appendix J: Form of Address Appendix K: Mail-Merge Instructions Table of Contents OVERVIEW OF THE CLERKSHIP PROGRAM A judicial clerkship can be a very rewarding work experience for a recent law graduate, and it is a great way to begin your legal career in almost any area of practice. The Law School and the Clerkship Committee strongly support our students’ efforts to apply for judicial clerkships through several means, including the following: ASSIGNING YOU A CLERKSHIP ADVISOR If you participate in the Clerkship Program, we will assign a member of the Clerkship Committee or the Career Services Office to be your advisor throughout the application process.
  • Cases of the Century

    Cases of the Century

    Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Volume 33 Number 2 Symposium on Trials of the Century Article 4 1-1-2000 Cases of the Century Laurie L. Levenson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Laurie L. Levenson, Cases of the Century, 33 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 585 (2000). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol33/iss2/4 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CASES OF THE CENTURY Laurie L. Levenson* I. INTRODUCTION I confess. I am a "trials of the century" junkie. Since my col- lege years, I have been interested in how high-profile cases reflect and alter our society. My first experience with a so-called trial of the century was in 1976. My roommate and I took a break from our pre- med studies so that we could venture up to San Francisco, sleep in the gutters and on the sidewalks of the Tenderloin, all for the oppor- tunity to watch the prosecution of newspaper heiress, Patty Hearst. It was fascinating. The social issues of our time converged in a fed- eral courtroom While lawyers may have been fixated on the techni- cal legal issues of the trial, the public's focus was on something en- tirely different.
  • The Methods Used to Secure Monetary Restitution

    The Methods Used to Secure Monetary Restitution

    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 25, Issue 6 2001 Article 11 The Methods Used to Secure Monetary Restitution Transcripts∗ ∗ Copyright c 2001 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj The Methods Used to Secure Monetary Restitution Transcripts Abstract Record of panel discussion of the methods used to secure monetary restitution for Holocaust survivors and their heirs. Panelists discussed class action suits brought on behalf of survivors and the use of large-scale litigation to win monetary restitution. THE METHODS USED TO SECURE MONETARY RESTITUTION NOVEMBER 1, 2001 MODERATOR: Menachem Z. Rosensaft, Esq., Partner,Ross & Hardies* PANELISTS: Michael Geier, Deputy Director Generalfor Legal Affairs, German Ministry of Foreign Relations** Samuel J. Dubbin, Esq., Dubbin & Kravetz, Lead counsel in class action, South FloridaHolocaust Survivors Coalition*** H. Carl McCall, Comptroller, New York Statet Gideon Taylor, Executive Vice-President, Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, Inc. tt * Menachem Rosensaft is a partner at Ross & Hardies in New York, concentrating in international, securities, and general commercial litigation. He is a former Executive Vice President of the Jewish Renaissance Foundation, Inc., the Founding Chair of the International Network of Children of Jewish Holocaust Survivors, and a former Na- tional President of the Labor Zionist Alliance. He is a member of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council's Executive Committee and a former Chair of its Content Committee and its Collections and Acquisitions Committee. An officer of the Park Ave- nue Synagogue in New York City, Mr. Rosensaft has written numerous articles for the New York Times, The Washington Post, Newsweek, the Los Angeles Times, the Jerusalem Post, and other publications.
  • History of the U.S. Attorneys

    History of the U.S. Attorneys

    Bicentennial Celebration of the United States Attorneys 1789 - 1989 "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor– indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one." QUOTED FROM STATEMENT OF MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND, BERGER V. UNITED STATES, 295 U. S. 88 (1935) Note: The information in this document was compiled from historical records maintained by the Offices of the United States Attorneys and by the Department of Justice. Every effort has been made to prepare accurate information. In some instances, this document mentions officials without the “United States Attorney” title, who nevertheless served under federal appointment to enforce the laws of the United States in federal territories prior to statehood and the creation of a federal judicial district. INTRODUCTION In this, the Bicentennial Year of the United States Constitution, the people of America find cause to celebrate the principles formulated at the inception of the nation Alexis de Tocqueville called, “The Great Experiment.” The experiment has worked, and the survival of the Constitution is proof of that.
  • Reforming Criminal Justice Vol. 2

    Reforming Criminal Justice Vol. 2

    Reforming Criminal Justice Volume 2: Policing Erik Luna Editor and Project Director Reforming Criminal Justice Volume 2: Policing Erik Luna Editor and Project Director a report by The Academy for Justice with the support of Copyright © 2017 All Rights Reserved This report and its contents may be used for non-profit educational and training purposes and for legal reform (legislative, judicial, and executive) without written permission but with a citation to the report. The Academy for Justice www.academyforjustice.org Erik Luna, Project Director A project of the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law Arizona State University Mail Code 9520 111 E. Taylor St. Phoenix, AZ 85004-4467 (480) 965-6181 https://law.asu.edu/ Suggested Citation Bluebook: 2 REFORMING CRIMINAL JUSTICE: POLICING (Erik Luna ed., 2017). APA: Luna, E. (Ed.). (2017). Reforming Criminal Justice: Policing (Vol. 2). Phoenix, AZ: Arizona State University. CMS: Luna, Erik, ed. Reforming Criminal Justice. Vol. 2, Policing. Phoenix: Arizona State University, 2017. Printed in the United States of America Summary of Report Contents Volume 1: Introduction and Criminalization Preface—Erik Luna Criminal Justice Reform: An Introduction—Clint Bolick The Changing Politics of Crime and the Future of Mass Incarceration— David Cole Overcriminalization—Douglas Husak Overfederalization—Stephen F. Smith Misdemeanors—Alexandra Natapoff Drug Prohibition and Violence—Jeffrey A. Miron Marijuana Legalization—Alex Kreit Sexual Offenses—Robert Weisberg Firearms and Violence—Franklin E. Zimring Gangs—Scott H. Decker Criminalizing Immigration—Jennifer M. Chacón Extraterritorial Jurisdiction—Julie Rose O’Sullivan Mental Disorder and Criminal Justice—Stephen J. Morse Juvenile Justice—Barry C. Feld Volume 2: Policing Democratic Accountability and Policing—Maria Ponomarenko and Barry Friedman Legal Remedies for Police Misconduct—Rachel A.
  • O Rei Está Nu: Gênero E Sexualidade Nas Práticas E Decisões No STF the King Is Naked: Gender and Sexuality in the Brazilian Supreme Court Practices and Decisions

    O Rei Está Nu: Gênero E Sexualidade Nas Práticas E Decisões No STF the King Is Naked: Gender and Sexuality in the Brazilian Supreme Court Practices and Decisions

    1084 O rei está nu: gênero e sexualidade nas práticas e decisões no STF The king is naked: gender and sexuality in the Brazilian Supreme Court practices and decisions Adriana Dias Vieira1 1 Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8907-7546. Roberto Efrem Filho2 2 Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Santa Rita, Paraíba, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9438-0080. Artigo recebido em 3/05/2020 e aceito em 4/05/2020. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Rev. Direito e Práx., Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 11, N.02, 2020, p. 1084-1136. Adriana Dias Vieira e Roberto Efrem Filho DOI: 10.1590/2179-8966/2020/50699| ISSN: 2179-8966 1085 Resumo Neste texto, procuramos tematizar diferentes formas como gênero e sexualidade informam práticas e decisões no âmbito do Supremo Tribunal Federal, ao tempo que políticas de gênero e sexualidade são operadas por seus ministros. Para tanto, valemo- nos da análise dos votos dos ministros em nove casos implicados em controvérsias públicas de gênero e sexualidade. Com isso, objetivamos investigar: a) as práticas generificadas de estruturação dos acórdãos produzidos no STF; e b) como seus ministros se empenham em uma gramática de sofrimento e na articulação da figura da vítima para reconhecer ou negar direitos. Palavras-chave: Gênero; Sexualidade; Supremo Tribunal Federal. Abstract This paper aims to address different ways in which gender and sexuality shape practices and decisions in the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court, considering that the judges of the court set and define gender and sexuality related policies.
  • NPRC) VIP List, 2009

    NPRC) VIP List, 2009

    Description of document: National Archives National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) VIP list, 2009 Requested date: December 2007 Released date: March 2008 Posted date: 04-January-2010 Source of document: National Personnel Records Center Military Personnel Records 9700 Page Avenue St. Louis, MO 63132-5100 Note: NPRC staff has compiled a list of prominent persons whose military records files they hold. They call this their VIP Listing. You can ask for a copy of any of these files simply by submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the address above. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
  • 1969 Journal

    1969 Journal

    : II STATISTICS Miscella- Original Appellate neous Total Vumber of cases on dockets. _ __ — 15 1, 758 2, 429 4, 202 ?ases disposed of_ _ 5 1, 433 1, 971 3, 409 Remaining on dockets. __ 10 325 458 793 Cases disposed of—Appellate Docket: By written opinions 105 By per curiam opinions or orders , 206 By motion to dismiss or per stipulation (merit cases) 1 By denial or dismissal of petitions for certiorari 1,121 Cases disposed of—Miscellaneous Docket By written opinions , 0 By denial or dismissal of petitions for certiorari 1,759 By denial or withdrawal of other applications 121 By granting of other applications , 3 By per curiam dismissal of appeals 36 By other per curiam opinions or orders 22 By transfer to Appellate Docket 30 dumber of written opinions 88 Number of printed per curiam opinions 21 Number of petitions for certiorari granted ( Appellate ) 73 Number of appeals in which jurisdiction was noted or post- poned (Appellate) 46 Number of admissions to bar 3,965 GENERAL: Page Court convened October 6, 1969, and adjourned June 29, 1970 1 and 510 Court recessed to attend President's State of Union Message 211 Justice Hugo L. Black's Birthday, noted. Comments by the Chief Justice 252 Reed, J., Designated and assigned to U.S. Court of Claims. 295 : : ; in GENERAL—Continued Page Clark, J. Designated and assigned to USCA-7 424 Designated and assigned to USCA-2 424 Designated and assigned to USCA-9 , 485 Designated and assigned to U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California 485 Retirement of John F.
  • PRÁTICA PROCESSUAL Constitucional E Administrativa

    PRÁTICA PROCESSUAL Constitucional E Administrativa

    ISBN: 978-85-61990-50-3 CADERNO DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO PRÁTICA PROCESSUAL Constitucional e Administrativa Coordenação: Lilian Rose Lemos Rocha André Pires Gontijo Aplicação Horizontal: Organizadores: Naiara Ferreira Martins Pedro Almeida Costa Rodrigo Gonçalves Ramos de Oliveira Rafael de Almeida Guimarães Tércia Martins de Barros Ferreira Brasília, 2016. Lilian Rose Lemos Rocha André Pires Gontijo CADERNO DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO PRÁTICA PROCESSUAL Constitucional e Administrativa Organizadores: Naiara Ferreira Martins Pedro Almeida Costa Rodrigo Gonçalves Ramos de Oliveira Rafael de Almeida Guimarães Tércia Martins de Barros Ferreira Brasília, 2016. Aplicação Horizontal: Aplicação Horizontal: REITORIA Reitor Getúlio Américo Moreira Lopes Vice-Reitor Edevaldo Alves da Silva Pró-Reitora Acadêmica Presidente do Conselho Editorial Elizabeth Lopes Manzur Pró-Reitor Administrativo-Financeiro Gabriel Costa Mallab Secretário-Geral Maurício de Sousa Neves Filho DIRETORIA Diretor Acadêmico Carlos Alberto da Cruz Diretor Administrativo-Financeiro Geraldo Rabelo INSTITUTO CEUB DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO - ICPD Diretor João Herculino de Souza Lopes Filho Diretor Técnico Rafael Aragão Souza Lopes Capa UniCEUB | Departamento de Comunicação e Marketing | ACC Projeto Gráfico e Diagramação AR Design Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) Caderno de pós-graduação em direito : prática processual, constitu- cional e administrativa / coordenadores, Lilian Rose Lemos Rocha, André Pires Gontijo. – Brasília : UniCEUB : ICPD, 2016.
  • Remarks at a Rally for Mayor David Dinkins in New York City October 28, 1993

    Remarks at a Rally for Mayor David Dinkins in New York City October 28, 1993

    Oct. 28 / Administration of William J. Clinton, 1993 make a contribution in accordance with our abil- time next year on the health care plan. It will ity to pay. begin with this, and the more people who know It goes way beyond that. We have certain what's in this, the more people who make con- group behaviors in this country that are impos- structive suggestions about how it can be im- ing intolerable burdens on the health care sys- proved, the better off we're all going to be. tem, which will never be remedies. And we So I ask you to think about this: This book must recognize every time another kid takes an- will be in every library in the country. It will other assault weapon onto another dark street be available, widely available. And now that the and commits another random drive-by shooting Government Printing Office has printed it, any and sends another child into the Johns Hopkins other publisher in the country can go out and emergency room, that adds to the cost of health try to print it for a lower cost. That's good. care. It is a human tragedy. It is also the dumb- That means we'll have a little competition and est thing we can permit to continue to go on these books will be everywhere. [Laughter] for our long-term economic health. Why do we I want to implore all of you to get this and continue to permit this to happen? read it, to get as many of your friends and And so we need to advocate those things, neighbors as possible to read it, and to create too.