<<

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY

CLINICAL COMMUNICATION

Acute eye (non-ulcerative ) associated with mini-scleral contact wear for

Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 245–248 DOI:10.1111/cxo.12033

Adrian S Bruce*† BScOptom PhD Mini-scleral lenses are an increasingly popular modality; however, there are PGCertOcTher FACO FAAO relatively few reports regarding the unique aspects of their fitting and potential complica- Leanne M Nguyen* BOptom tions. We report a complication of mini-scleral lens wear in a 44-year-old female patient using PGDipAdvClinOptom PGCertOcTher the lenses for keratoconus. Her mini-scleral contact lenses were non-fenestrated and fitted *Australian College of Optometry, Carlton, Victoria, to vault over the and seal at the periphery. The patient presented with an acute red Australia eye (non-ulcerative keratitis), characterised by unilateral severe conjunctival and limbal † Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The hyperaemia, corneal infiltration and . Refitting the lens to increase the corneal vault University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia E-mail: [email protected] clearance did not prevent recurrence of the keratitis, some five months later. Successful prevention of further episodes of the acute was achieved through improved patient compliance with lens cleaning, disinfection and lens case procedures. Lens hygiene may be Submitted: 11 August 2012 particularly important for mini-scleral lenses with a sealed fitting. Revised: 23 November 2012 Accepted for publication: 29 November 2012

Key words: cornea, contact lenses, keratitis, keratoconus

Mini-scleral contact lenses combine the Dohlman, Boruchoff and Mobilia6 reported late in the previous day. Vision of the right optical performance advantage of a gas- an acute non-infectious infiltrative keratitis (unaided) eye was less than 6/120 with hand permeable lens material, together with the requiring immediate cessation of lens wear. movements at three metres and left (with comfort and stability benefits of the larger Since then, there have been many reported a contact lens) was 6/9.5. The patient was lens diameter usually associated with a soft cases of acute red eye in contact lens wearers healthy in all other respects and was not lens. Mini-scleral lenses use a standard gas- but to our knowledge, this complication has diabetic or immuno-compromised. permeable material but with a total lens not been reported in association with mini- Slitlamp examination showed severe diameter of 13 to 18 mm.1 The large diam- scleral lens wear. (Grade 3.5+, Efron scale) bulbar conjuncti- eter improves the stability of the fitting and An acute red eye is a potentially serious val and limbal hyperaemia in the right eye improves lens comfort for the patient, as condition, since failure to remove the (Figure 1), the superior was slightly there is less lid interaction and lower lens contact lens, or to stop lens wear following swollen and the cornea showed three small movement. repeated episodes in the same patient, can (less than 0.5 mm) diffuse infiltrates posi- Mini-scleral lenses can be prescribed for lead to a more severe inflammatory reac- tioned in the 2 o’clock to 4 o’clock position patients with irregular corneal topography, tion involving the anterior , including in the mid-peripheral cornea. There was such as in keratoconus or following kerato- aqueous flare and keratic precipitates.7 no corneal ulceration and only minimal plasty, to provide good vision where stand- Ultimately, a sterile with punctate corneal fluorescein staining. Other ard corneal gas-permeable lenses no longer formation can result and this has potential signs of corneal infection were provide a suitable fit. Mini-scleral lenses been reported in three cases of aphakic absent, with no discharge and the anterior can also be used to form a ‘liquid corneal hydrogel extended wear.8,9 chamber was quiet. bandage’, for conditions where therapeutic This paper presents an acute red eye as a Intraocular pressure and dilated fundus contact lenses have a proven benefit, includ- complication of mini-scleral lens daily wear examination were normal. The left eye ing ocular surface disease,2 for pain relief in for keratoconus. appeared normal. Management consisted of bullous keratopathy and recurrent erosions3 cessation of right contact lens wear, cold and to promote recovery in limbal stem cell CASE REPORT compresses and topical lubricants both four disease.4 times daily (Refresh Celluvisc unit dose, An acute red eye in contact lens wear A 44-year-old female patient with kerato- Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA).10 An antibiotic was characterised in 1978 by Zantos and conus presented with symptoms of a painful was not prescribed, given the absence of an Holden,5 as a non-ulcerative keratitis, associ- and red right eye. She normally wore mini- infective process or a significant epithelial ated with acute ocular pain and marked con- scleral contact lenses but had discontinued defect. A mild could have been junctival hyperaemia. Even earlier in 1973, right lens wear since the onset of symptoms prescribed to hasten symptomatic relief but

© 2013 The Authors Clinical and Experimental Optometry 96.2 March 2013 Clinical and Experimental Optometry © 2013 Optometrists Association Australia 245 Acute red eye associated with contact lens wear for keratoconus Bruce and Nguyen

were normal. Vision was 6/19 with a -6.50 D sphere (DS) spectacle lens. Management consisted of fluoromethalone 0.1 per cent four times daily (FML, Allergan) prescribed for one week, with cessation of contact lens wear, cold compresses four times daily and topical lubricants also four times daily (Systane, Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA).10 The steroid was prescribed as the keratitis was a recurrence. At the next after- care visit, vision with the contact lens was R 6/9.5, the same as baseline. Other risk factors were examined. The patient had been using Boston Simplus mul- tipurpose solution but reported rubbing her lenses only every one to two weeks, rather than the recommended daily surface clean- ing. The lens case was ‘not clean and looking old’ and replacement was advised. Solution Figure 1. Acute red eye (non-ulcerative keratitis) associated with hypersensitivity was considered unlikely, as mini-scleral contact lens wear for keratoconus. The cornea showed the ocular reaction would be expected to be trace diffuse infiltrates at about the 2 o’clock position in the bilateral and every day rather than episodic. mid-periphery but no significant corneal fluorescein staining. The risk of a hypersensitivity or toxicity reac- tion may be further minimised by ensuring the soaking solution is rinsed off the lens with saline and the lens is then filled with a was not considered necessary. The red The right mini-scleral lens was refitted to fresh non-preserved unitdose solution prior eye resolved within two days and the patient increase the corneal clearance, to be similar to insertion. was able to resume right contact lens wear. to the left (unaffected) eye, by steepening An issue for the patient was that she Vision at the next visit was 6/9.5 in the right the back optic zone radius. The parameters felt highly dependent on her contact lenses eye, the same as before the event. of the new right lens were 6.9/16.0/-6.00 due to the keratoconus. Average contact lens Once the acute red eye had resolved, an with a standard periphery. The new steeper wearing time was 14 to 15 hours per day, as evaluation of the contact lenses was made lens showed improved clearance and an vision with her glasses did not meet her to minimise the risk of recurrence. The increased tear film reservoir (Figure 2B), requirements. patient was wearing Eyecon mini-scleral which was expected to help avoid recurrence Contact lens maintenance was identified lenses (Capricornia Contact Lens, Brisbane, by diluting any build-up of antigens or as the most likely factor contributing to the Qld, Australia) with the following param- exotoxins. Proper lens maintenance was recurrent acute red eye. A two-step system eters: R 7.2/16.0/-4.00 and L 6.8/16.0/-6.25 emphasised, including rubbing the lens for was prescribed for daily use, with Boston with a standard proprietary design for the cleaning followed by saline rinsing of the Advance Cleaner and Boston Advance periphery. She was using Boston Simplus lens. Comfort Formula conditioning solution multipurpose solution (Bausch & Lomb, At aftercare the new lens performed well, (Baush & Lomb). Boston One Step Liquid Rochester, NY, USA) for disinfection and vision was 6/9.5 and the patient showed Enzymatic Cleaner (Bausch & Lomb) was each morning one vial of Refresh Celluvisc acceptable compliance with cleaning and recommended for weekly protein removal. was placed into each lens at insertion. The rubbing her lenses with the Boston Simplus The patient was also directed to replace her affected lens was two months old. solution. In the meantime, the patient contact lens case every month. The fluorescein pattern fitting analysis had consulted with an ophthalmologist, who The patient was followed for a further 12 showed central touch in the right confirmed that the eye had cleared satisfac- months, at six-month intervals. The infiltra- eye and corneal clearance in the left eye with torily and who agreed with the management. tive keratitis was not observed to recur at the lens periphery resting over the . There was a recurrence of the right acute aftercare, although the patient did report Visante anterior optical coherence tomogra- red eye almost five months later. The patient two instances of milder hyperaemia that phy (OCT) confirmed the light corneal presented with the same she was able to self-manage by ceasing lens touch and inadequate clearance in the as for the first episode. There was conjun- wear and using cold compresses and lubri- right eye (Figure 2A). Corneal topography ctival hyperaemia, mild inferior corneal cants. She also sometimes found her eyes showed the bilateral keratoconus with a punctate staining and four small (less were more comfortable, if the Celluvisc was central nipple cone appearance, slightly than 0.5 mm) infiltrates positioned in the replenished every four hours. Toward the greater in the left eye. The simulated kerato- 4 o’clock to 6 o’clock area of the cornea, end of the 12-month period, replacement metric readings were right: 5.95 mm @106, about 1.0 to 2.0 mm from the limbus. There of the left contact lens was recommended, as 6.40 mm @016 and left: 5.62 mm @098, was no discharge, ulceration or anterior it was two years old and had started to cause 6.09 mm @008. chamber reaction and intraocular pressures irritation.

Clinical and Experimental Optometry 96.2 March 2013 © 2013 The Authors 246 Clinical and Experimental Optometry © 2013 Optometrists Association Australia Acute red eye associated with contact lens wear for keratoconus Bruce and Nguyen

Figure 2. (A) Anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan showing the fitting relationship for the initial mini-scleral lens on the right eye. There is a relatively small degree of clearance between the lens and cornea. (B) Anterior-segment OCT scan showing the fitting relationship for the refitted mini-scleral lens on the right eye. The contact lens shows greater clearance from the cornea, compared to the original lens fitting.

compliance with lens maintenance, then the coccus pneumoniae organisms have been iso- DISCUSSION multipurpose system may have less margin lated from the lenses of patients with acute 21,22 There has been a resurgence of interest in for error. Conversely, it may be argued that red eye in extended wear. Other Gram- recent years with larger diameter gas- a multipurpose system is easier to comply negative identified in lenses and permeable lenses for keratoconus and other with, giving greater patient satisfaction. In solutions of patients with acute red eye are causes of corneal irregularity.1 Improve- any event, good clinical follow-up remains and Pseudomonas aerugi- 16 17 ments in manufacturing of mini-scleral important. nosa. The contact lens case is frequently lenses, as well as advances in the fitting Whether the results on gas-permeable contaminated and is also known to be process using anterior-segment OCT11 have maintenance solutions are applicable to associated with contamination of the lens 23 combined to make fitting simpler and more mini-scleral gas-permeable lenses with a itself. predictable. While the corneal gas- sealed fitting is not yet established. With the In conclusion, we have reported the permeable lenses remain the most common sealed fitting, by design there is little or no occurrence of an acute red eye (non- lens design for keratoconus, mini-scleral tear film replenishment behind the lens. If ulcerative keratitis) in association with mini- lenses appear to have progressed and are there is any contamination of the lens case or scleral contact lens wear. We found that being prescribed more widely. lens prior to lens insertion, then the eye may having an adequate corneal clearance vault While mini-scleral lenses differ in lens be exposed for a considerable time. Holden was not in itself sufficient to avoid recur- 17 design from standard corneal gas-permeable and colleagues showed an acute red eye rence of the keratitis. For this patient lenses, the same gas-permeable mainte- reaction may occur for soft lenses in less than with keratoconus wearing mini-scleral con- nance solutions are used in lens care. Boost, eight hours of closed eye lens wear, if the lens tact lenses, improved compliance with lens Cho and Lai12 found current gas-permeable is heavily contaminated with bacteria. This cleaning, disinfection and lens case proce- maintenance solutions, including Boston mechanism may help explain how an acute dures proved more successful in avoid- Simplus, to be effective disinfectants when infiltrative keratitis could potentially occur ing recurrence of the acute red eye. Lens evaluated against Food and Drug Adminis- with a sealed mini-scleral lens fitting if the hygiene may be particularly important for tration criteria; however, there was a gradual lens is not clean. mini-scleral lenses with a sealed fitting. reduction in efficacy over a 12-week period The acute red eye is most often associated 18 and storing of solutions in the refrigerator with soft contact lens extended wear. An REFERENCES was not recommended. For , acute non-ulcerative keratitis is a rare com- 19 1. Schornack MM, Patel SV. Scleral lenses in the man- there have been conflicting reports on the plication of gas-permeable lens daily wear agement of keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens 2010; 1: and gas-permeable lens extended wear20 efficacy of Boston Advance and Boston 39–44. Simplus.13,14 and does not appear to have been reported 2. Jacobs DS. Update on scleral lenses. Curr Opin Patients may prefer a multipurpose gas- previously in association with mini-scleral Ophthalmol 2008, 19: 298–301. permeable solution like Boston Simplus lenses. 3. Jackson AJ, Sinton JE, Frazer DG, Morrison E. Bacteria that cause an acute red eye reac- Therapeutic contact lenses and their use in the compared to a two-step system with a sepa- management of anterior segment pathology. JBr rate surfactant cleaner, as the multipurpose tion are adherent to the contact lens rather Contact Lens Assoc 1996; 19: 11–19. solution is simpler to use.15 When Boston than colonising the ocular surface or , 4. Schornack MM. Limbal stem cell disease: manage- Simplus is used in accordance with manufac- which is consistent with the observation that ment with scleral lenses. Clin Exp Optom 2011; 94: 592–594. turer directions, it usually achieves adequate symptoms rapidly subside once the lens is 5. Zantos SG, Holden BA. Ocular changes associated 16 removed.10 Both Gram-negative Haemophilus lens cleaning and maintains eye health. with continuous wear of contact lenses. Aust J Optom Nevertheless, if the patient is at risk for non- influenzae bacteria and Gram-positive Strepto- 1978; 61: 418–426.

© 2013 The Authors Clinical and Experimental Optometry 96.2 March 2013 Clinical and Experimental Optometry © 2013 Optometrists Association Australia 247 Acute red eye associated with contact lens wear for keratoconus Bruce and Nguyen

6. Dohlman CH, Boruchoff A, Mobilia EF. Complica- tions in the use of soft contact lenses in corneal disease. Arch Ophthalmol 1973; 90: 367–371. 7. Bruce AS, Brennan NA. Corneal pathophysiology with contact lenses. Surv Ophthalmol 1990; 35: 25–58. 8. Snyder D, Litinsky S, Gelender H. Hypopyon irido- cyclitis associated with extended wear soft contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1982; 93: 519–520. 9. Murphy G. A case of sterile endophthalmitis asso- ciated with the extended wear of an aphakic soft contact lens. Contact Intraocul Lens Med J 1981; 7: 5–7. 10. Bruce AS, Loughnan MS. Anterior and Therapeutics A-Z. 2nd edn. Sydney: Elsevier, 2011. p 72–73. 11. Gemoules G. A novel method of fitting scleral lenses using high resolution optical coherence tomography. Eye Contact Lens 2008; 34: 80–83. 12. Boost M, Cho P, Lai S. Efficacy of multipurpose solutions for rigid gas permeable lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2006; 26: 468–475. 13. Hiti K, Walochnik J, Haller-Schober EM, Faschinger C, Aspock H. Efficacy of contact lens storage solutions against different acanthamoeba strains. Cornea 2006; 25; 423–427. 14. Boost MV, Shi G-S, Lai S, Cho P. Amoebicidal effects of contact lens disinfecting solutions. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 44–51 15. Rah MJ, Deng L, Johns L, Lang J. A comparison of multipurpose and conventional 2-step rigid gas- permeable solutions with Paragon corneal refrac- tive therapy lenses. Optometry 2009; 80: 193–196. 16. de Brabander J, Kok JHC, Nuijts RMMA. Evalua- tion of a new system of lens parameter selection and comparison of traditional vs one-step lens care systems for aspheric high-Dk RGP contact lenses. CLAO J 2000; 26: 193–197. 17. Holden BA, La Hood D, Grant T, Newton-Howes J, Baleriola-Lucas C, Willcox MD, Sweeney DF. Gram- negative bacteria can induce contact lens related acute red eye (CLARE) responses. CLAO J 1996; 22: 47–52. 18. Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Covey M, Sankaridurg PR, Vajdic C, Holden BA, Sharma S et al. Clinical char- acterization of corneal infiltrative events observed with soft contact lens wear. Cornea 2003; 22: 435– 442. 19. Golding TR, Bruce AS, Fletcher EL. Non-ulcerative keratitis in RGP daily wear. Clin Exp Optom 1990; 73: 178–183. 20. Schnider CM, Zabkiewicz K, Holden BA. Unusual complications associated with RGP extended wear. Int Contact Lens Clin 1988: 15: 124–129. 21. Sankaridurg PR, Willcox MDP, Sharma S, Gopi- nathan U, Janakiraman D, Hickson S, Vuppala N et al. Haemophilus influenzae adherent to contact lenses associated with production of acute ocular inflammation. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 2426–2431. 22. Sankaridurg PR, Sharma S, Willcox M, Sweeney DF, Naduvilath TJ, Holden BA, Rao GN. Colonization of hydrogel lenses with Streptococcus pneumo- niae: risk of development of corneal infiltrates. Cornea 1999; 18: 289–295. 23. Boost MV, Cho P. Microbial Flora of tears of orthokeratology patients, and microbial contami- nation of contact lenses and contact lens accesso- ries Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 451–458.

Clinical and Experimental Optometry 96.2 March 2013 © 2013 The Authors 248 Clinical and Experimental Optometry © 2013 Optometrists Association Australia