DOCSLIB.ORG

Interpretation of a Seismic Reflection Survey And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interpretation of a Seismic Reflection Survey And Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2018 Interpretation of a Seismic Reflection Survey and Geophysical Well Logs in Jay County, Indiana: Orientation and Composition of a Carbonate Layer Below the Mount Simon Sandstone Md. Saiful Alam Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Earth Sciences Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Repository Citation Alam, Md. Saiful, "Interpretation of a Seismic Reflection Survey and Geophysical Well Logs in Jay County, Indiana: Orientation and Composition of a Carbonate Layer Below the Mount Simon Sandstone" (2018). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 1958. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1958 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTERPRETATION OF A SEISMIC REFLECTION SURVEY AND GEOPHYSICAL WELL LOGS IN JAY COUNTY, INDIANA: ORIENTATION AND COMPOSITION OF A CARBONATE LAYER BELOW THE MOUNT SIMON SANDSTONE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science By MD. SAIFUL ALAM M.S. Dhaka University, 2015 B.S. Dhaka University, 2013 2018 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL April 24, 2018 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Md. Saiful Alam ENTITLED Interpretation of a Seismic Reflection Survey and Geophysical Well Logs in Jay County, Indiana: Orientation and Composition of a Carbonate Layer Below the Mount Simon Sandstone BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science. Ernest Hauser, Ph.D. Thesis Director David F. Dominic, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences Committee on Final Examination Ernest C. Hauser, Ph.D. Doyle R. Watts, Ph.D. David F. Dominic, Ph.D. Barry Milligan, Ph.D. Interim Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Alam, Md. Saiful, M.S., Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Wright State University, 2018. Interpretation of a Seismic Reflection Survey and Geophysical Well Logs in Jay County, Indiana: Orientation and Composition of a Carbonate Layer Below the Mount Simon Sandstone. In August 2017, a dynamite-sourced 2D seismic reflection survey was conducted along a gravel road northwest of Portland, Indiana. The main focus of the survey was to determine the orientation of a lithologic unit previously identified by Welder (2014) on a similar 2D seismic reflection survey in the same area. Drillers logs of two wells within this area identified a limestone layer below the Mt. Simon Sandstone, and a similar limestone layer was identified in a well drilled in Clark County, Ohio. As the focus of this study, this limestone layer will be informally named the ‘Votaw limestone’. The seismic line studied by Welder (2014) was oriented west-east; the seismic line utilized in this study is oriented north-south and crosses the previous one. Together, these seismic lines allow the true orientation of the Votaw limestone to be determined. Geophysical logs from nearby wells and two distant ones (north central Indiana and western Ohio) were used to produce synthetic seismograms which together with drillers logs were used identify the top of Eden, Trenton, Knox, Eau Claire, Mt. Simon, and Middle Run formations. The top of the Votaw limestone was associated with a reflection in the seismic data using the synthetics and the drillers logs for the nearby wells. Importantly, where the Middle Run iii Formation exists, the Votaw limestone occurs below the top of the Middle Run. The Votaw limestone is horizontal in both north-south and west-east seismic lines, confirming that it is truly horizontal in this area. This limestone could be present beneath the Middle Run in Warren County, Ohio, based on similar seismic characteristics of reflectors. The pre-stack CDP’s were used to analyze the Amplitude Variation with Offset (AVO) response of the limestone layer. The limestone reflector primarily exhibited a negative gradient with some variations suggesting an impurity of the limestone. The limestone reflector in the area is parallel to the overlying Paleozoic reflectors suggesting the lack of any Grenville deformation. For all these reasons, the site could be a prime candidate for drilling and coring of the entire lithologic sequence beneath the Mt. Simon Sandstone. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................. xi 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Discovery of Middle Run Formation ............................................................................... 2 1.2. Origin of Middle Run Formation ..................................................................................... 3 1.3. Structural Setting of Indiana ............................................................................................ 6 1.4. Stratigraphy of the Area ................................................................................................... 8 1.5. Previous Study................................................................................................................ 12 1.6. Data Acquisition ............................................................................................................. 15 2. METHODOLGY .................................................................................................................. 17 2.1. Data Processing .............................................................................................................. 17 2.2. Depth Conversion ........................................................................................................... 20 2.3. Well Log Interpretation .................................................................................................. 25 3. INTERPRETATION............................................................................................................. 27 v 3.1. Synthetic Seismogram Generation ................................................................................. 27 3.2. Wavelet Extraction ......................................................................................................... 28 3.3. Analysis of Formation Tops ........................................................................................... 30 3.4. Comparison of Synthetic to Seismic .............................................................................. 31 3.5. Picking Horizons ............................................................................................................ 38 3.6. Votaw limestone ............................................................................................................. 43 4. AVO ...................................................................................................................................... 52 4.1. AVO Class Description .................................................................................................. 52 4.2. AVO Analysis ................................................................................................................ 53 5. SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................... 57 References ..................................................................................................................................... 59 APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................... 62 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - The extent of the East Continent Rift Basin ................................................................... 4 Figure 2 - Annotated and interpreted versions of COCORP OH-1 ................................................ 5 Figure 3 - Model showing the East Continent Rift System ............................................................ 6 Figure 4 - Tectonic features of Indiana. .......................................................................................... 7 Figure 5 - General Stratigraphic Column for Paleozoic Rocks in Indiana ................................... 10 Figure 6 - The geographical distribution of various rocks formations found in Indiana. ............. 11 Figure 7 - The Location of WSU-2013 seismic line ..................................................................... 12 Figure 8 - Annotated and Interpreted version of WSU-2013 ....................................................... 14 Figure 9 - Enlarged portion of the WSU-2013. ............................................................................ 15 Figure 10 – The WSU-2017 seismic line .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geologic Storage Formation Classification: Understanding Its Importance and Impacts on CCS Opportunities in the United States
    BEST PRACTICES for: Geologic Storage Formation Classification: Understanding Its Importance and Impacts on CCS Opportunities in the United States First Edition Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed therein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Cover Photos—Credits for images shown on the cover are noted with the corresponding figures within this document. Geologic Storage Formation Classification: Understanding Its Importance and Impacts on CCS Opportunities in the United States September 2010 National Energy Technology Laboratory www.netl.doe.gov DOE/NETL-2010/1420 Table of Contents Table of Contents 5 Table of Contents Executive Summary ____________________________________________________________________________ 10 1.0 Introduction and Background
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Ordovician
    Open File Report LXXVI the shale is also variously colored. Glauconite is generally abundant in the formation. The Eau Claire A Summary of the Stratigraphy of the increases in thickness southward in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan where it becomes much more Southern Peninsula of Michigan * dolomitic. by: The Dresbach sandstone is a fine to medium grained E. J. Baltrusaites, C. K. Clark, G. V. Cohee, R. P. Grant sandstone with well rounded and angular quartz grains. W. A. Kelly, K. K. Landes, G. D. Lindberg and R. B. Thin beds of argillaceous dolomite may occur locally in Newcombe of the Michigan Geological Society * the sandstone. It is about 100 feet thick in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan but is absent in Northern Indiana. The Franconia sandstone is a fine to medium grained Cambrian glauconitic and dolomitic sandstone. It is from 10 to 20 Cambrian rocks in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan feet thick where present in the Southern Peninsula. consist of sandstone, dolomite, and some shale. These * See last page rocks, Lake Superior sandstone, which are of Upper Cambrian age overlie pre-Cambrian rocks and are The Trempealeau is predominantly a buff to light brown divided into the Jacobsville sandstone overlain by the dolomite with a minor amount of sandy, glauconitic Munising. The Munising sandstone at the north is dolomite and dolomitic shale in the basal part. Zones of divided southward into the following formations in sandy dolomite are in the Trempealeau in addition to the ascending order: Mount Simon, Eau Claire, Dresbach basal part. A small amount of chert may be found in and Franconia sandstones overlain by the Trampealeau various places in the formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Kope Formation Disturbed
    Types and Examples of Slides Glossary – Clay-rich deposits prone to failure, – Fine-grained laminated deposits of Landslides and board Backwater deposits Lake bed clays they are best developed south of the Ohio River. They occur clay and silt laid down in lakes dammed by ice during fences tilted, monuments tilted pulled apart in terraces at the mouths of tributaries to a larger stream the Pleistocene Epoch (Ice Age). They are exceptionally Your Property colluvium - soil where glacial outwash caused a temporary lake to form. unstable, even on gentle slopes. OH tension Bedrock – Term used by engineers and geologists when Lamination – A texture in soil or rock that is made up of Study curved tree Area trunks cracks, tilted referring to the Ordovician limestones and shales that very thin (a few millimeters to a centimeter) parallel layers IN pavement underlie soil everywhere in the area. The bedrock itself (see fig. 21). The layers may reflect an annual pattern of seldom fails, and so determining the depth to bedrock is a sedimentation. KY Kope Formation tilted guard key part of any site investigation. rails and Ordovician System – The set of rock formations that utility poles Bridging – Large rock fragments that interfere with proper make up the local bedrock. It consists of limestone and trace of compaction of finer fill material. shale that was deposited in an ancient ocean between 444 scarp and 488 million years ago. Colluvium – A clay-rich deposit derived from weathering of bedrock that has moved downslope by gravity from its – Sand and gravel deposits left from the flowing CREEP Outwash place of origin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classic Upper Ordovician Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Eastern Cincinnati Arch
    International Geoscience Programme Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett – Kyle R. Hartshorn – Allison L. Young – Cameron E. Schwalbach – Alycia L. Stigall International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - 2018 - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Kyle R. Hartshorn Dry Dredgers, 6473 Jayfield Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, USA ([email protected]) Allison L. Young Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Cameron E. Schwalbach 1099 Clough Pike, Batavia, OH 45103, USA ([email protected]) Alycia L. Stigall Department of Geological Sciences and OHIO Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Studies, Ohio University, 316 Clippinger Lab, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA ([email protected]) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We extend our thanks to the many colleagues and students who have aided us in our field work, discussions, and publications, including Chris Aucoin, Ben Dattilo, Brad Deline, Rebecca Freeman, Steve Holland, T.J. Malgieri, Pat McLaughlin, Charles Mitchell, Tim Paton, Alex Ries, Tom Schramm, and James Thomka. No less gratitude goes to the many local collectors, amateurs in name only: Jack Kallmeyer, Tom Bantel, Don Bissett, Dan Cooper, Stephen Felton, Ron Fine, Rich Fuchs, Bill Heimbrock, Jerry Rush, and dozens of other Dry Dredgers. We are also grateful to David Meyer and Arnie Miller for insightful discussions of the Cincinnatian, and to Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Cincinnati Arch Region For
    PRELIMINARY HYDROGEOLOGIC EVALUATION OF THE CINCINNATI ARCH REGION FOR UNDERGROUND HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL, INDIANA, KENTUCKY, AND OHIO By Orville B. Lloyd, Jr., and Robert W. Davis U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4098 Raleigh, North Carolina 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information, Copies of this report can contact: be purchased from: Chief, Branch of Nuclear Waste Hydrology Books and Open-File Reports U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey National Center, Mail Stop 410 Federal Center, Building 810 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Box 25425 Reston, Virginia 22092 Denver, Colorado 80225 or District Chief U.S. Geological Survey Post Office Box 2857 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Telephone: (919) 856-4510 CONTENTS Page Abstract. ............................... 1 Introduction. ............................. 2 Background ............................ 2 Purpose and scope. ........................ 4 Previous investigations. ..................... 4 Acknowledgments.......................... 6 Methods of investigation. ....................... 6 Hydrogeology of the sedimentary rocks ................. 8 General geology. ......................... 8 Hydrogeologic framework. ..................... 14 Basal sandstone aquifer ................... 14 Potential confining unit. .................. 17 Distribution and source of freshwater, saline water, and brine. ........................... 19 Ground-water occurrence and
    [Show full text]
  • B2150-B FRONT Final
    Bedrock Geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Missouri By W. John Nelson THE PADUCAH CUSMAP QUADRANGLE: RESOURCE AND TOPICAL INVESTIGATIONS Martin B. Goldhaber, Project Coordinator T OF EN TH TM E U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2150–B R I A N P T E E R D . I O S . R A joint study conducted in collaboration with the Illinois State Geological U Survey, the Indiana Geological Survey, the Kentucky Geological Survey, and the Missouri M 9 Division of Geology and Land Survey A 8 4 R C H 3, 1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Schaefer, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nelson, W. John Bedrock geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Ken- tucky, and Missouri / by W. John Nelson. p. cm.—(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2150–B) (The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no. : I 19.3:2150–B 1. Geology—Middle West. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B QE75.B9 no. 2150–B [QE78.7] [557.3 s—dc21 97–7724 [557.7] CIP CONTENTS Abstract ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MIDCONTINENT RIFT SYSTEM BIBLIOGRAPHY by Steven A
    MIDCONTINENT RIFT SYSTEM BIBLIOGRAPHY By Steven A. Hauck December 1995 Technical Report NRRI/TR-95/33 Funded by the Natural Resources Research Institute In Preparation for the 1995 International Geological Correlation Program Project 336 Field Conference in Duluth, MN Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota, Duluth 5013 Miller Trunk Highway Duluth, MN 55811-1442 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1 THE DATABASE .............................................. 1 Use of the PAPYRUS Retriever Program (Diskette) .............. 3 Updates, Questions, Comments, Etc. ......................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................... 4 MIDCONTINENT RIFT SYSTEM BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................... 5 AUTHOR INDEX ................................................. 191 KEYWORD INDEX ................................................ 216 i This page left blank intentionally. ii INTRODUCTION The co-chairs of the IGCP Project 336 field conference on the Midcontinent Rift System felt that a comprehensive bibliography of articles relating to a wide variety of subjects would be beneficial to individuals interested in, or working on, the Midcontinent Rift System. There are 2,543 references (>4.2 MB) included on the diskette at the back of this volume. PAPYRUS Bibliography System software by Research Software Design of Portland, Oregon, USA, was used in compiling the database. A retriever program (v. 7.0.011) for the database was provided by Research Software Design for use with the database. The retriever program allows the user to use the database without altering the contents of the database. However, the database can be used, changed, or augmented with a complete version of the program (ordering information can be found in the readme file). The retriever program allows the user to search the database and print from the database. The diskette contains compressed data files.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordovician News 2005
    ORDOVICIAN NEWS SUBCOMMISSION ON ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON STRATIGRAPHY Nº 22 2005 ORDOVICIAN NEWS Nº 22 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF GEOLOGIAL SCIENCES President: ZHANG HONGREN (China) Vice-President: S. HALDORSEN (Norway) Secretary General: P. T. BOBROWSKI (Canada) Treasurer: A. BRAMBATI (Italy) Past-President: E.F.J. DE MULDER (The Netherlands) INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON STRATIGRAPHY Chairman: F. GRADSTEIN (Norway) Vice-Chairman: S. C. FINNEY (USA) Secretary General: J. OGG (USA) Past-Chairman: J. REMANE (Switzerland) INTERNATIONAL SUBCOMMISSION ON ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY Chairman: CHEN XU (China) Vice-Chairman: J. C. GUTIÉRREZ MARCO (Spain) Secretary: G. L. ALBANESI (Argentina) F. G. ACEÑOLAZA (Argentina) A. V. DRONOV (Russia) O. FATKA (Czech Republic) S. C. FINNEY (USA) R. A. FORTEY (UK) D. A. HARPER (Denmark) W. D. HUFF (USA) LI JUN (China) C. E. MITCHELL (USA) R. S. NICOLL (Australia) G. S. NOWLAN (Canada) A. W. OWEN (UK) F. PARIS (France) I. PERCIVAL (Australia) L. E. POPOV (Russia) M. R. SALTZMAN (USA) Copyright © IUGS 2005 i ORDOVICIAN NEWS Nº 22 CONTENTS Page NOTE FOR CONTRIBUTORS iii EDITOR'S NOTE iii CHAIRMAN´S AND SECRETARY´S ADDRESSES iii CHAIRMAN´S REPORT 1 SOS ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2001 1 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIA AND CONFERENCES 4 PROJECTS 7 SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 7 HONORARY NOTES 8 MISCELLANEA 9 CURRENT RESEARCH 9 RECENT ORDOVICIAN PUBLICATIONS 25 NAMES AND ADDRESS CHANGES 40 URL: http://www.ordovician.cn, http://seis.natsci.csulb.edu/ISOS Cover: The Wangjiawan GSSP for the base of the Hirnantian Stage, China. ii ORDOVICIAN NEWS Nº 22 NOTE FOR CONTRIBUTORS The continued health and survival of Ordovician News depends on YOU to send in items of Ordovician interest such as lists and reviews of recent publications, brief summaries of current research, notices of relevant local, national and international meetings, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water Pollution Potential of Warren County, Ohio
    GROUND WATER POLLUTION POTENTIAL OF WARREN COUNTY, OHIO BY THE CENTER FOR GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY AND THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER GROUND WATER RESOURCES SECTION GROUND WATER POLLUTION POTENTIAL REPORT NO. 17 OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER GROUND WATER RESOURCES SECTION MAY 1992 ABSTRACT A ground water pollution potential mapping program for Ohio has been developed under the direction of the Division of Water, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, using the DRASTIC mapping process. The DRASTIC system consists of two major elements: the designation of mappable units, termed hydrogeologic settings, and the superposition of a relative rating system for pollution potential. Hydrogeologic settings form the basis of the system and incorporate the major hydrogeologic factors that affect and control ground water movement and occurrence including depth to water, net recharge, aquifer media, soil media, topography, impact of the vadose zone media and hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer. These factors, which form the acronym DRASTIC, are incorporated into a relative ranking scheme that uses a combination of weights and ratings to produce a numerical value called the ground water pollution potential index. Hydrogeologic settings are combined with the pollution potential indexes to create units that can be graphically displayed on a map. Ground water pollution potential mapping in Warren County resulted in a map with symbols and colors which illustrate areas of varying ground water contamination vulnerability. Four hydrogeologic settings were identified in Warren County with computed ground water pollution potential indexes ranging from 61 to 202. The ground water pollution potential mapping program optimizes the use of existing data to rank areas with respect to relative vulnerability to contamination.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic Lithostratigraphic Nomenclature for Minnesota
    MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PRISCILLA C. GREW, Director PALEOZOIC LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE FOR MINNESOTA John H. Mossier Report of Investigations 36 ISSN 0076-9177 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Saint Paul - 1987 PALEOZOIC LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE FOR MINNESOTA CONTENTS Abstract. Structural and sedimentological framework • Cambrian System • 2 Mt. Simon Sandstone. 2 Eau Claire Formation • 6 Galesville Sandstone • 8 Ironton Sandstone. 9 Franconia Formation. 9 St. Lawrence Formation. 11 Jordan Standstone. 12 Ordovician System. 13 Prairie du Chien Group. 14 Oneota Dolomite. 14 Shakopee Formation. 15 St. Peter Sandstone. 17 Glenwood Formation. 17 Platteville Formation. 18 Decorah Shale. 19 Galena Group • 22 Cummings ville Formation. 22 Prosser Limestone. 23 Stewartville Formation • 24 Dubuque Formation. 24 Maquoketa Formation. 25 Devonian System • 25 Spillville Formation • 26 Wapsipinicon Formation 26 Cedar Valley Formation • 26 Northwestern Minnesota. 28 Winnipeg Formation • 28 Red River Formation. 29 Acknowledgments • 30 References cited. 30 Appendix--Principal gamma logs used to construct the composite gamma log illustrated on Plate 1. 36 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 • Paleozoic lithostratigraphic nomenclature for Minnesota • .in pocket Figure 1. Paleogeographic maps of southeastern Minnesota • 3 2. Map showing locations of outcrops, type sections, and cores, southeastern t1innesota • 4 3. Upper Cambrian stratigraphic nomenclature 7 iii Figure 4. Lower Ordovician stratigraphic nomenclature • • • • 14 5. Upper Ordovician stratigraphic nomenclature 20 6. Middle Devonian stratigraphic nomenclature. • • . • • 27 7. Map showing locations of cores and cuttings in northwestern Minnesota • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 29 TABLE Table 1. Representative cores in Upper Cambrian formations •••••• 5 The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, religion, color, sex, national orgin, handicap, age, veteran status, or sexual orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide in the Cambrian Mount Simon Sandstone Figure 1
    Geological sequestration of AUTHORS David A. Barnes Michigan Geological carbon dioxide in the Cambrian Repository for Research and Education and Geosciences, Western Michigan University, Mount Simon Sandstone: Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008; [email protected] Regional storage capacity, David Barnes is a professor of geosciences and a research scientist at the Michigan Geological site characterization, and Repository for Research and Education at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Cali- large-scale injection feasibility, fornia Santa Barbara in 1982 with an emphasis in sedimentary geology, he worked for SOHIO Michigan Basin Petroleum Company in the early 1980s, and he has been at Western Michigan University since David A. Barnes, Diana H. Bacon, and Stephen R. Kelley 1986. Diana H. Bacon Battelle Pacific Northwest Division, Richland, Washington 99352; ABSTRACT [email protected] Diana H. Bacon has 23 years of experience in The Mount Simon Sandstone (Cambrian) is recognized as an impor- vadose zone hydrology and geochemistry. She tant deep saline reservoir with potential to serve as a target for geolog- received her Ph.D. in geology from Washington ical sequestration in the Midwest, United States. The Mount Simon State University in 1997 and her M.S. degree in Sandstone in Michigan consists primarily of sandy clastics and grades hydrology from New Mexico Institute of Mining upward into the more argillaceous Eau Claire Formation, which and Technology in 1986. She has been a research serves as a regional confining zone. The Mount Simon Sandstone lies scientist at Battelle since May 1986 and is cur- at depths from about 914 m (3000 ft) to more than 4572 m (15,000 ft) rently supporting the development of STOMP-CO2 in the Michigan Basin and ranges in thickness from more than 396 m for several midwestern regional carbon se- (1300 ft) to near zero adjacent to basement highs.
    [Show full text]