DOCSLIB.ORG

Theinstitote on Ti |Smeli Reunions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Theinstitote on Ti |Smeli Reunions THEINSTITOTE ON TI |SMELI REUNIONS A Three-Year Report 1982-1985 THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE Any weakening of American Jewry, any lowering of its sense of security, any disruption of its communal life, any diminution of its status, is a definite loss to Jews everywhere and to Israel in particular. — David Ben Gurion With all my heart and conviction I feel that my fate and that of my children... are inextricably tied, whether we like it or not, to Israel. — Morris B. Abram Honorary President, The American Jewish Committee Why an Institute on American Jewish-Israeli Relations? Israel and American Jewry — the two largest most vibrant Jewish communities in the world — are inextricably linked by ties of religion and history, a deep sense of kinship and common destiny. But notwithstanding the myriad of constructive relationships that have been forged over the years, there have been recurrent tensions as the two communities have traveled along divergent paths. Often misperceptions and misunderstandings about one another have served to alienate, rather than to unite them. It is vital for the future of Israel as it is for the future of American Jewry that such differences and tensions as exist between them be continuously examined and confronted. It is essential that the two communities learn to listen to one another, to appreciate each other's unique history, value systems and accompanying mindsets. Without such understanding, appropriate and effective modes of cooperation cannot proceed. It was toward this end that the Institute of American Jewish-Israeli Relations was created in the Fall of 1982 as an arm of the American Jewish Committee. For, surprisingly, while there were — and are — many American Jewish organizations devoted to building understanding and support for Israel here in America, there were — and are — relatively few efforts or programs under way to enhance Israel's and Israelis' understanding of the needs and concerns of the American Jewish community. Yet, for the foreseeable future, Israel may require for her own survival all the economic, political and intellectual support American Jewry can provide. How the Institute Functions The Institute is housed in the American Jewish Committee's national headquarters in New York and in its office in Jerusalem. Thus it has access to the Committee's extensive resources and facilities nationally, in the communities and in Israel. It is professionally directed by Bertram H. Gold, Executive Vice President Emeritus of the American Jewish Committee, assisted by Selma Hirsh, former Associate Director of the AJC. Morris Fine, earlier the Director of the AJC's Foreign Affairs Department, serves as a special consultant, and Mordechai Gazit, one-time Director-General of the Israeli Prime Minister's Office, is the Institute's consultant in Israel. Two Advisory Boards — one in the U.S. and one in Israel — help to chart the Institute's direction and oversee its programs in both countries. The American Advisory Board, currently chaired by Stuart Eizenstat, includes some 50 distinguished American Jews with diverse interests and points of view. The full Board meets twice a year, but small ad hoc committees are convened as necessary to advise on specific programs. The Israeli Board is chaired by S. Zalman Abramov, former Deputy Speaker of the Knesset, and is made up of approximately 25 prominent men and women who bring an Israeli perspective to the Institute's program. The two Boards meet periodically to exchange views on specific issues. During its first three years, the Institute undertook a number of programs, including research, policy studies, publications, dialogues and consultations in Israel and the U.S., and sponsored visits to the U.S. by young Israeli potential leaders to enhance their understanding about America and American Jews. It has sought to develop new perspectives on issues of mutual concern and to propose new and independent initiatives to help the American Jewish community and Israel achieve more effective interaction, not only in times of crisis but day after day. The Program Understanding One Another We regard Israel with awe. We regard it as a place of sanctity and inspiration. But the question is how to concretize these feelings without undermining the legitimate authority of the Diaspora — Dr. Gerson D. Cohen Chancellor, Jewish Theological Seminary, New York Definitions may be good for scholars but such terms as "centrality" or "priority" or "primary" have no practical consequences for the relationship between Israel and the Diaspora The main problem is how to improve the content of this mutual relationship, how to strengthen existing ties and how to deal with points of dispute. — Simcha Dinitz Vice President, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem From its beginning, the Institute has sought to identify the primary issues troubling each community. At their initial meetings, both the American and the Israeli Advisory Boards discussed frankly their differing perceptions about the centrality of Israel, the concept of aliyah, such questions as religious pluralism (or the lack of it) in Israel and the matter of political dissent. Their deliberations were summarized in two publications: Understanding One Another: Excerpts of a Discussion on American]ewish-Israeli Relations (1983) and Understanding One Another-. An Israeli Perspective (1984). Since the founding of the State, there have been countless consultations and conferences and thousands of words written and spoken, in Hebrew and in English, in both countries on these and related issues. As further background for its work, the Institute commissioned and published a summary of the major dialogues over the years, as well as an up-to- date bibliography of significant articles on Israel- Diaspora relations. The two publications, Reasoning Together: Three Decades of Discussion Between American and IsraeliJews by Etta Bick, and Israel- Diaspora Relations: A Selected Annotated Bibliography by Morrris Fine appeared in 1984. 4 Joint meetings of the American and Israeli Advisory Boards were held in Jerusalem in March and November 1983, and in January and February 1985. At the most recent joint meeting, Stuart Eizenstat discussed Israel's economic crisis in the context of American-Israeli relations. His address was widely reported in the Israeli press and was later published in Commentary magazine. How American Jews And Israelis See Each Other Early in its programming, the Institute realized that, despite all that had gone on before, there were little if any available data on how American Jews view Israel, and what Israelis today think about the U.S. and American Jews. Convinced that such information is essential if its programs are to be responsive to real, rather than imagined problems and needs, the Institute commissioned two in-depth surveys. The first, undertaken by Professor Steven M. Cohen of Queens College, City University of New York, investigated the nature and extent of American Jewry's involvement in pro-Israel activities, the depth of the emotional attachment of American Jews to Israel, their perceptions about Israelis, and their attitudes toward a range of Israeli foreign and domestic policies. The study, utilizing sophisticated techniques and methodology, involved interviews with a random sample of approximately seven hundred American Jews and a selected stratum of Jewish communal leadership. Its findings were published in 1983 under the title Attitudes of American Jews Toward Israel and Israelis. A companion study was conducted simultaneously in Israel by Hanoch Smith of the Smith Research Center, a highly regarded Israeli polling organization. This was a national probability sample covering more than a thousand interviews, including Israelis in cities, towns, new development towns, kibbutzim and moshavim, individuals from different countries of origin and with wide-ranging political preferences. Those findings were published under the title Attitudes of Israelis Toward America and American Jews. The two studies, and an accompanying discussion guide, provided the springboard for dialogues and discussion groups in both countries. Their key findings were widely reported in the press both here and in Israel. The insights gathered from these and related studies were also discussed in a penetrating publication commissioned by the Institute: Israeli and American Jews: Toward A Meaningful Dialogue (1984) by a noted Israeli psychologist, Drora Kass. The author stresses the need to confront the fact that there will always be tensions "between Israelis' particularism and American Jewish pluralism" and therefore it is imperative for the two communities to find new ways of meshing old values with new realities, of building a relationship that is meaningful and relevant to the new generation growing up on both sides of the ocean. Getting To Know American Jewry There is not one Jewish people but two, maybe more, I now realize. But where is the common denominator between us? I worry because I now see that American Jews are not likely to come to Israel in great numbers. What would that mean for Israel's future? We have learned so many stereotypes about American Jews. Now I realize we need to learn much more about who you really are and who we are. These are but a few of the comments made by some 27 young Israelis at the end of their two-week visits to major centers of Jewish population across the country. Brought to the U.S. by the Institute, they came in three separate groups (May '83, '84 and '85) to learn something of America and the American Jewish way of life. Chosen because they were viewed as potential leaders of their country, the young Israelis were remarkably representative of the professionals and intellectuals of their generation in Israel today. This unique and ongoing program, made possible by a gift from Matthew and Edna Brown of Boston is, perhaps, one of the Institute's most important and innovative programs to date. For the fact is that a considerable portion of the Israeli population today is young, born after the State itself, and while young American Jews have many opportunities to study, work, or visit in Israel, young Israelis do not have comparable opportunities in the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Jewish Year Book
    AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK A Record of Events iind Trends in American and World Jewish Life 1979 AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE AND JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY OF AMERICA The 1979 AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, the seventy-ninth in the series, continues to offer a unique chronicle of developments in areas of concern to Jews throughout the world. The present volume features Professor Charles Liebman s "Leadership and Decision-making in a Jewish Federation." This in- depth study of the New York Fed- eration of Jewish Philanthropies provides important insights into the changing outlook of American Jews, and the impact this is having on Jewish communal priorities. Another feature is Professor Leon Shapiro's "Soviet Jewry Since the Death of Stalin," an authoritative overview of Jewish life in the So- viet Union during the past twenty- five years. Particularly noteworthy is Professor Shapiro's emphasis on religious life and cultural endeavors. The review of developments in the United States includes Milton Ellerin's "Intergroup Relations"; George Gruen's "The United States, Israel and the Middle East"; and Geraldine Rosenfield's "The Jewish Community Responds to (Continued on back flap) $15. American Jewish Year Book American Jewish Year Book 1 VOLUME 79 Prepared by THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE Editors MORRIS FINE MILTON HIMMELFARB Associate Editor DAVID SINGER THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE NEW YORK THE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY OF AMERICA PHILADELPHIA COPYRIGHT, 1978 BY THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE AND THE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY OF AMERICA All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher: except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review to be printed in a magazine or newspaper.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernisering Kernwapens Midden-Oosten Minderheden
    a.r. staatkunde 79/11 Inhoud pag. 394 pag.419 Van de redactie De vreemdeling die in uw steden woont De (politieke) problematiek van de etnische min­ pag. 395 derheden in Nederland Modemisering van de NAVO-atoombewapening door dr. H. van Ruller en H. Koetje door M. H. von Meyenfeldt pag. 432 pag.400 interview met ir. D. S. Tuijnman De modemisering van de kernwapens door dr. G. Puchinger door prof. mr. P. J. Teunissen pag. 405 Het Midden-Oostenconflict: enkele hoofdlijnen door ds. J. G. K. Uttooij 79/11 4ge jaargang, november 1979 Modernisering kernwapens Von Meyenfeldtlreunissen ... Midden-Oosten Littooij Minderheden Van Ruller/Koetje Interview: Tuijnman Puchinger a.r. a. staatkunde 79/11 st! Van de redactie M N, een eenheid. Er zijn er die de kernwapenontwik­ keling als onafwendbaar aanvaarden en de mo- .. dernisering zien als een door het oostblok afge­ dwongen reactie op de ontwikkelingen daar. Moeilijker hebben die voorstanders het, die zich bewust zijn van de vrijwel zelfstandige voort­ gang in de militaire technologie, die zowel in het oosten als in het westen de politiek wordt opge­ drongen. Dit is voor velen onaanvaardbaar, om- dat het in de grond van de zaak een uitzichtloze ontwikkeling is, die demonische trekken gaat vertonen. Maar voor deze stroming is het even onaimvaardbaar, door een abrupte en eenzijdi- ge vermindering reacties op te roepen die voor het in-stand-houden van de wereldvrede even Dit nummer wordt geopend met twee bijdragen bedreigend kunnen zijn. Als gevolg van de over de modernisering van de Europese kernwa­ 'kwaliteit' van de thans beschikbare kernwa­ pens; de heer M.
    [Show full text]
  • MS-603: Rabbi Marc H
    MS-603: Rabbi Marc H. Tanenbaum Collection, 1945-1992. Series C: lnterreligious Activities. 1952-1992 Box 44, Folder 9, Religious pluralism, 1981-1984. 3101 Clifton Ave, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220 (513) 221-1875 phone, (513) 221-7812 fax americanjewisharchives.org '' •• .. ,.. 3 tD .-10·. 3 THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE 0... D> date February 9, 1981 ~ Abe Karlikow a. to c from M. Bernard Resnikoff 3 subjeot Februaf'Y 1st Symposium on Religious Pluralism A departmental report on the national consultation on religious pluralism will follow in due course. Meanwhile, as a part of that report, I enclose the following: 1) Conclusions and Recommendations 2) Copy of article which appeared in Ha'aretz and rough English translation 3) Copy of article which appeared in Ma'ariv and rough English translation More to come . MBR/sw Encl. dictated by not read CC : - -~ - _,,). ~· . • .. ' •: ._.,, . ' f4 t;) '?<S'P0~7 .. :. illllll) From the Israel Office of the American Jewish Committee •: ~ Rehov Ethiopia 9, Jerusalem 95 149 Tel. 228862, 233551 Cable: Wishom, Jerusalem Symposium on ·RELIGIOUS PLURALISM IN ISRAEL AND ·IN THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMUNITY Conclusions and Reconunendations 1. Purpose and Framework of the Sumposium a. The purpose of the symposium that took place on February 1, 1981 in Jerusalem was to convene a selected group of concerned and influential individuals from all walks of life, including orthodox, conservative, reform and secular, to discuss if, what and how to promote religious pluralism in Israel, and if and what can be learned from the experience of the American Jewish community • . In particular, the goal was to see how the issue can be addressed from the legal, legislative, educational and political aspects .
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE EPHRAIM TABORY, Ph.D. Office: Bar-Ilan University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, 52900 Ramat-Gan, Israel (Building 213, Room 330) Telephone: +972-3-5318190 Fax: +972-3-7384037 E-mail: [email protected] Current Position: Associate Professor of Sociology and Anthropology, Bar Ilan University Director, Interdisciplinary Graduate Program on Conflict Resolution and Negotiation Research interests: Sociology of religion; Social psychology; Intergroup relations; Law and society PUBLICATIONS Books Jewish Choices: American Jewish Denominationalism, B. Lazerwitz, J. A. Winter, A. Dashefsky and E. Tabory. New York: SUNY Press, 1998. Americans Abroad: A Comparative Study of Emigrants from the United States, A. Dashefsky, J. DeAmicis, B. Lazerwitz and E. Tabory. New York: Plenum Publishing, 1992. Articles "A religious profile of American Reform Judaism." (E. Tabory and Uzi Rebhun, Reform Judaism, Avraham Rosenack, editor. Jerusdalem: Van Leer Institute, forthcoming). "Attachment to Israel and Jewish identity: An assessment of an assessment.” Contemporary Jewry 30: 191-197, 2010, doi 10.1007/s12397-010-9052-5. "Framing religious conflict: Salience, polarization and solidarity in the discourses of Jewish Israelis." (T. Sasson, E. Tabory and D. Selinger-Abutbul) Journal of Church and State 52 (4): 662-685, 2010, doi:10.1093/jcs/csq0872010. "Converging political cultures: How globalization is shaping the discourses of American and Israeli Jews." (E. Tabory and T. Sasson). Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 16: 22-41, 1 2010, http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a919551336~frm=titlelink "Crossing the threshold: State religion, and opposition to legally-imposed religious weddings." E. Tabory and S. Shalev Lev-Tzur. Review of Religious Research 50(3): 261-276, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Pluralism Israel.Pdf
    THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE I st tute of Human Relat ans 165 East 56 5t eet New Yo k NY 10022 Plaza 1-4000 December 1982 Dear Friend The Status of Religious Pluralism in Israel is a subject of deep and con­ tinual concern We believe that you will be inter­ ested therefore in the report by the Israel office of the Amer1can Jewish Committee of a major symposium on the subJect of re11gious pluralism held in Israel at which participants also con­ sidered whether and how American Jew­ ish experience might find application in Israel At the same time our apologies You will find a number of typographical errors in this report There are not many printers in Israel alss who can handle the English language with full competence Yet though this remains a problem that plagues the Israel Print­ ing Office universities and others we Simply should not have permitted it to happen We send this report therefore in full cognizance of its faults but also in the belief that the subject is im~ portant enough that we hope you will pardon its errors \ Foreign Affairs Department 82-550-50 • The Status of Religious Pluralism . in Israel The American Jewisb Committee 9 Ethiopia I \ I ~I I I The Status of RebgIous Plurahsm m Israel , / The help of the Israel InterfaIth COmmIttee I) In plannIng and collatIng thIS publIcatIon IS gratefully acknowledged I I L The Amencan Jewish Committee 9 Etlnopla Street Jerusalem Israel ( _----4" TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PROGRAM OF THE SYMPOSIUM lV RELIGION IN ISRAEL - BETWEEN STATUS QUO AND PLURALISM 1 S Zalman Abramov M K
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESS MONTHLY (USPS 714080) Is Pub- SHIMON SHETREET Is on the Faculty of Law, Hebrew University
    SPECIAL ISSUE $1.00 NOV.-DEC. 1980 VOL. 47, NO. 7 CONGRESS A Journal of Opinion and Jewish Affairs MONTHLY i Right to Participate in Each Other's if fairs and the Limits of That Right American- Israel Dialogue Morris Abram / Zalman Abramov / Phil Baum / Yehuda Ben-Meir / Yosef Burg / David Clayman Kenneth Dauber / Annette Dulzin / Abba Eban / Marshall Goldman / Merle Goldman / Samuel Heilman Chiae Herzig / Eliezer Jaffe / Abraham Karp / Leon Kronish / Joseph Lapid / Ruth Lapidoth / Theodore Mann Mordechai Nisan / William Orbach / Uzi Oman / Cynthia Ozick / Michael Pelavin / Eliezer Rafaeli Danny Rosolio / Edward Sanders / Harold Schulweis / Shimon Shetreet / Henry Siegman / Zvi Sobel Howard Squadron / Mervin Verbit / Moshe Yegar / David Zucker CCWAVils.r ״'־N JEW \׳.7m Ah*m\c B f a u sfein Lihr^•,, VOL. 47 NO. 7 NOV-DEC 1960 The 16th American-Israel Dialogue OPENING SESSION The Right to Participate in Each Other's Affairs Theodore Mann PARTICIPANTS Abba Eban YosefBurg MORRIS ABRAM is a lawyer and former president of Brandeis University. SECOND SESSION ZALMAN ABRAMOV is a member of the Israeli Knesset. THIRD SESSION PHIL BAUM is the associate executive director of American Jewish Congress. The Right to Influence YEHUDA BEN-MEIR is chairman of the National Religious Party and a Knesset membei Foreign Affairs Policies YOSEF BURG is Minister of Interior in Israel. Morris B. Abram 13 Moshe Yegar 17 DAVID CLAYMAN is the Israel director of AJCongress. KENNETH DAUBER is associate professor of English literature at SUNY, Buffalo. FOURTH SESSION The Right to Influence Each ANNETTE DULZIN is a political columnist in Israel. Other's Religious Practices ABBA EBAN, a member of the Knesset, was formerly Israel's Foreign Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Land with Promise: Ch Aim Nachman Bialik's America
    WASTE LAND WITH PROMISE: CH AIM NACHMAN BIALIK'S AMERICA Michael Brown Close connectionswith theUnited States were forged bymany Yishuv leaders in the interwarperiod. Although on first consider ation, thepoet Chaim Nachman Bialik might seeman unlikelyperson to have extensive American ties, in fact, he was instrumental in bindingthe cultural world of theYishuv toAmerica. Never conversant withAmerican lifeor literature,Bialik was able nonethelessto develop personal ties with many American Jews, and he grew to appreciate the advances of American-Jewish culture. Like leaders in other areas of Yishuv life,he recognized thefinancial and diplomatic necessityof close American connections. He helped to pave the way for Israel's laterclose relationshipwith American Jewryand theUnited States. What a foreignpoet who died in themid-1930s thoughtof the United States would seem to be an arcane, if not altogether frivolous question. In many cultures, however, writers exert on considerable influence public affairs. Witness, for example, the position of Vaclav Havel in post-communist Czechoslova kia, or that of Sartre and Camus in postwar France. Jews, "the JewishPolitical Studies Review 6:3-4 (Fall 1994) 47 This content downloaded from 77.127.163.174 on Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:11:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 48 Michael Brown people of the book/' may be somewhat more open to the influ ence of the literati thanothers. Especially in theperiod between theEmancipation and thebirth of Israel,when theirpolitical life was circumscribed and the influence of religion upon them declining, they filled some of the void with culture. They ac cepted poets, essayists, and novelists as tastemakers and ex a pected them to assume certain role in setting the communal agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Fides Et Libertas for 2000
    FIDES ET LIBERTAS 2 0 0 0 The Journal of the International Religious Liberty Association FIDES ET LIBERTAS 2 0 0 0 The Journal o f the International Religious Liberty Association International Religious Liberty Association 12501 Old Columbia Pike Silver Spring, Maryland 20904-6600, United States of America Phone 301.680.6680 Fax 301.680.6695 Email [email protected] Web site www.IRLA.org International Religious Liberty Association OFFICERS Bert B. Beach (U.S.A.), President 2000 Matthew A. Bediako (Ghana), Gunnar Staalsett (Norway), Denton Lotz (U.S.A.), Robert W. Nixon (U.S.A.), Leo S. Ranzolin (Brazil, U.S.A.), Vice Presidents John Graz (France, Switzerland), Secretary General Richard Lee Fenn (U.S.A.), Deputy Secretary General Donald E. Robinson (U.S.A.), Treasurer Rajmund Dabrowski (Poland), Director of Communication Jonathan Gallagher (U.K.), News Director and Webmaster Mitchell A. Tyner (U.S.A.), Legal Counsel Marilyn Riley (U.S.A.), Milind Lazarus Borge (U.S.A.), Staff BOARD OF DIRECTORS Bert B. Beach (U.S.A.), Chair 2000 Matthew A. Bediako (Ghana), Gunnar Staalsett (Norway), Denton Lotz (U.S.A.), Robert W. Nixon (U.S.A.), Leo S. Ranzolin (Brazil, U.S.A.), Vice Chairs John Graz (France, Switzerland), Secretary General Richard Lee Fenn (U.S.A.), Deputy Secretary General Siloe Joao de Almeida (Brazil), Lee Boothby (U.S.A.), Reinder Bruinsma (Netherlands), Ray L. Coombe (Australia), Rajmund Dabrowski (Poland), W. Cole Durham (U.S.A.), Clarence E. Hodges (U.S.A.), Eugene Hsu (China), Anatoly Krasikov (Russia), Victor P. Krushenitsky (Russia), Roland Minnerath (France), Mario Nino (U.S.A.), Jan Paulsen (Norway), Donald E.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Law of Return: Analysis of Its Evioution and Present Application Nancy C
    Penn State International Law Review Volume 12 Article 4 Number 1 Dickinson Journal of International Law 9-1-1993 Israel's Law of Return: Analysis of Its EvIoution and Present Application Nancy C. Richmond Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Richmond, Nancy C. (1993) "Israel's Law of Return: Analysis of Its EvIoution and Present Application," Penn State International Law Review: Vol. 12: No. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr/vol12/iss1/4 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Penn State International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTS I Israel's Law of Return: Analysis of Its Evolution and Present Application I. Introduction To Zion, looks, the Jew, So long our hopes are not yet lost- Two thousand years we cherished them- To live in freedom in the Land Of Zion and Jerusalem. Excerpt from Hatikvah, the National Anthem of the State of Israel' The lyrics of Hatikvah reflect the yearnings that Jews have felt throughout centuries of persecution, yearnings to return to their homeland, the ancient land of Israel. While these yearnings appeared quashed after the Holocaust, in the wake of this disaster, "Zionism alone emerged as a viable Jewish response" to the horrors of anti- Semitism.2 This movement resulted in the establishment of the state of Israel on May 14, 1948, in accordance with the United Nations' adoption of the resolution for the formation of an independent Jewish state in Palestine.' In reparation for the devastation the Holocaust 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Rights, Ethno-Nationality, and Sovereignty in History
    1111 2 Land Rights, Ethno-Nationality, 3 4 and Sovereignty in History 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1 2 3111 The complex relationships between ethno-nationality, rights to land, and 4 territorial sovereignty have long fed disputes over territorial control and 5 landed rights between different nations, different ethnicities, and different 6 religions. These disputes raise a number of interesting issues related to the 7 nature of land regimes and to their economic and political implications. 8 The studies drawn together in this volume explore these and related issues 9 for a broad variety of countries and times, and illuminate the diverse causes 20111 of ethno-national land disputes, and the different forms of adjustment and 1 accommodation to the power differences between the contesting groups. 2 This is done within a generalized framework outlined by the editors in their 3 analytical overview, which offers contours for comparative examinations of 4 such disputes, past and present. Some of the issues discussed include: 5 6 • the structure and functioning of land markets in which the participa- 7 tion of “others” (ethno-nationally, religiously, or otherwise identified) 8 has been restricted or barred altogether; 9 • the political and economic underpinning of such constraints; 30111 • the implications of ethno-nationally restricted land markets for the allo- 1 cation and utilization of resources, income distribution, and economic 2 performance in the societies concerned. 3 4 Providing conceptual and factual analyses of a comparative nature and a 5 wealth of empirical material (both historical and contemporary), this book 6 will appeal to economic historians, economists, political scientists, sociolo- 7 gists, anthropologists, and all scholars interested in issues concerning 8 ethno-nationality and land rights in historical perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • T.C. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Felsefe Ve Din Bilimleri Anabilim Dali Dinler Tarihi Bilim Dali
    T.C. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ FELSEFE VE DİN BİLİMLERİ ANABİLİM DALI DİNLER TARİHİ BİLİM DALI MESİH İNANCININ YAHUDİ TOPLUMUNDAKİ SOSYAL VE SİYASAL YANSIMALARI (XVIII. YÜZYILDAN İTİBAREN) DOKTORA TEZİ ŞULE İSMİHAN TÜREM ANKARA 2017 T.C. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ FELSEFE VE DİN BİLİMLERİ ANABİLİM DALI DİNLER TARİHİ BİLİM DALI MESİH İNANCININ YAHUDİ TOPLUMUNDAKİ SOSYAL VE SİYASAL YANSIMALARI (XVIII. YÜZYILDAN İTİBAREN) DOKTORA TEZİ HAZIRLAYAN ŞULE İSMİHAN TÜREM TEZ DANIŞMANI PROF. DR. BAKİ ADAM ANKARA 2017 TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ MÜDÜRLÜĞÜNE Bu belge ile, bu tezdeki bütün bilgilerin akademik kurallara ve etik davranış ilkelerine uygun olarak toplanıp sunulduğunu beyan ederim. Bu kural ve ilkelerin gereği olarak, çalışmada bana ait olmayan tüm veri, düşünce ve sonuçları andığımı ve kaynağını gösterdiğimi ayrıca beyan ederim.(……/……/20…) Şule İsmihan Türem İmzası ÖNSÖZ Ortadoğu’da asırlardır devam eden, zaman zaman şiddeti azalan, zaman zaman artan, kökeninde din ve toprak ögesi barındıran, hiç birimizin duyarsız kalmadığı Yahudi–Arap toprak savaşı süre gelmektedir. Kimine göre iki bin yıldır, kimine göre ise yetmiş yıldan fazladır devam eden bu savaşta yıllardır çok sayıda insan ölmüştür. Bu toprak kavgasının Yahudiler kısmı her zaman Siyonist hareketle ilişkilendirilmiştir. Aslında Siyonizm bu durumun görünen kısmıdır. Oysa arka planda Yahudileri Siyonizm’den önce topraklara göçe yönlendiren, orada yerleşkeler kurduran, Yahudi toplumunu yeniden bir araya toplayarak devlet kurmak isteyen ve daha sonra devletin kuruluşuna destek olan önemli öncü hareket vardır. Bu hareket, dinsel bir olgu olan Mesih inancının Ortodoks Yahudilik tarafından yeniden yorumlanmasının yarattığı sosyal ve siyasal yansımalardır. Yahudiler nerdeyse iki bin yıldır sürgünden dönüp Vaat edilen topraklara yerleşmek, Mabetlerini yeniden yapmak ve Kral Süleyman zamanındaki gibi büyük İsrail Devletini kurmak için zamanı geldiğinde Tanrı’nın göndereceği Davud soyundan Kral Mesih’in gelmesini beklemişlerdir.
    [Show full text]
  • Reform and Conservative Judaism in Israel: a Social and Religious Profile
    Reform and Conservative Judaism in Israel: A Social and Religious Profile by EPHRAIM TABORY XOWERFUL FORCES are currently at work in Israeli society to modify Orthodox Judaism in the direction of greater conservatism.1 On a state level, efforts are being made to apply the halakhah to many spheres of public life—to enforce Sabbath prohibitions against public entertain- ment, soccer games, and El Al flights.2 The Orthodox yeshivot and the chief rabbis are also becoming increasingly militant in their demands. It is in this atmosphere that the Reform and Conservative denominations in Israel are seeking to become established Jewish movements on an equal footing with Orthodoxy. There would appear to be a market for Reform and Conservative Judaism in Israel. While about 17 per cent of Israel's Jews classify themselves as "religious" (basically co-terminous with Orthodox),3 it is estimated that 75 per cent of the population observe a "non-secular" life style.4 Many among the latter group could presumably be attracted to the more liberal forms of religion offered by Reform and Conservative Judaism. In fact, however, these movements have met with only a limited response in Israel. Of the Note: This study was supported, in part, by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health, United States Health Service (grant number IR 03 MH 24972-01A1). Appreciation is also expressed to the Memorial Foundation for Jewish Culture and Bar-Ilan University for fellowships during the study period. Bernard Lazerwitz made many useful suggestions during the course of this study, and I am very much indebted to him.
    [Show full text]