Posted on Authorea 13 May 2020 — CC-BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158938626.63090753 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. o ero c:slcindsielmtdeetv ouainsz hog h Pleistocene the through size population effective limited Alexander despite Alana selection ice: on deer of Roe Views issue this and Pleistocene. in in News the biology article through Ecology reproductive important Cover’ size with Molecular for the population associated selection ‘From effective genes does reduced a on how to acting In due is is, drift selection species? question would genetic that big a heightened It demonstrate a of despite even- (2020) 1). but demography among deer, al. genus roe selection, historical (Fig. et only natural the Jong diapause the of with de embryonic and Ecology, interact product as — Molecular mammals known the diapause, placental also likely as few ice”, is such a “on trait traits, only development unusual of embryonic an one putting are such of They seem capable odd. — little ungulates a are toed spp.) (Capreolus deer Roe Abstract 2020 13, May 2 1 Alexander Alana size population effective limited Pleistocene despite the selection through ice: on deer Roe eei rf u ordcdeetv ouainsz hog h Pleistocene. ‘From the a through In size heightened population despite effective species? deer, [ roe reduced a in to biology of due reproductive is important with demography drift trait for associated of genetic historical selection genes unusual issue on does an the acting this how such is with is, selection in seem interact question article would big Cover’ It diapause, a the as but 1). development selection, embryonic such (Fig. natural putting traits, diapause of of embryonic product capable as the — known likely ungulates also even-toed ice”, among “on genus only the and ( deer 0000-0002-0164-9878) ID: Roe (ORCID Zealand [email protected] New author: Dunedin, corresponding Otago, 0000-0002-6456-7757) * of ID: University (ORCID Zoology, Zealand of New Department Dunedin, 2. Otago, of University Anatomy, of Department 1. atogigslcin itrcldmgah,o oh a eacalnigedaor( of endeavour impacts challenging the a with be consistent distinguish- can are However, population both, a 2009). or in demography, Stewart, diversity historical & and genetic diversity (Hofreiter selection, contemporary genetic populations past/ongoing on of influence plant patterns conditions. outsized and whether an environmental animal ing had favourable have of with Pleistocene structure coincide the geographic of to fluctuations offspring climate intensive of The birth the of timing the deer roe European gargus) A 1: Figure nvriyo tg eateto Zoology of Department Otago of University Otago of University ml ashfk opoiepooo o erfo authors from deer roe of photo provide to Warschefsky Emily hs pce r h nytoatoatl aal folgt ipue hc allows which diapause, obligate of capable artiodactyls two only the are species these , Capreolus 1* n uoi Dutoit Ludovic and 1 n uoi Dutoit Ludovic and p. r iteod hyaeoeo nyafwpaetlmmas— mammals placental few a only of one are They odd. little a are spp.) Cpelscapreolus) (Capreolus oeua Ecology Molecular 2 2 1 ln ihteSbra o deer roe Siberian the with Along . eJn ta.(00 eosrt that demonstrate (2020) al. et Jong de , ] i.2 Fig. C py- (C. .The ). Posted on Authorea 13 May 2020 — CC-BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158938626.63090753 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. oaohr n sdti ehdt siaetedvrec ieo uoenadSbra o erat popula- deer multiple roe included authors Siberian the and deer, roe European European of of history time demographic divergence Transition. recent Mid-Pleistocene the more two species investigate the estimate To one the with from to between consistent reads ago, raw method seen mapping years to similarity this by million they model deer of used 0.9-1.35 Hominidae, roe levels this and Siberian within the use and another, divergences achieve European well-characterised They to the to with between take time. method similarity between would the this moving through estimated validating it for species After generations probabilities two currently. of transition the species (the number and between species the rate, sister states for mutation two data. nucleotide solve between given genomic similarity “different” on a of based and value population), times initial “same” ancestral divergence an the estimating on of relying for theta model method Markovian new a elegant constructed an They other introduce to also authors than deer. lower The markedly roe Cervinae a Siberian in despite the deer found with roe comparison those European in in to retained similar were paralogs (more These addition, paralogs In divergent species; analyses. of Capreolinae exome evidence the whole a showed within their utilise change in selection, non-synonymous selection (2020) under of be rate al. to high ( that et particularly lineage revealing Jong a deer genes, showed reproductive de roe candidate to diapause, using linked ungulates, embryonic genes analysis with other on similar associated deer from a roe performed Siberian data in generated They selection exome positive newly biology. ongoing with the demonstrate including combination patterns. to deer genomes, framework in demographic roe phylogenetic deer genome, long-term roe European the investigate deer for using to roe data By (RADseq) species structure. sequencing population deer contemporary DNA ( roe genus Associated both deer site roe from ( Restriction the genomes within generate use selection they ( investigate further Finally, to deer They Cervidae roe across allele Siberian exomes ). Minor whole for utilise genome = (2020) annotated roe MAF al. high-quality European a dynamics. among Disequilibrium. Pleistocene generating structure Linkage by After population influenced = marked (far also LD deer finding likely roe analyses European populations, homozygosity. are of deer divergence of populations shown the specific Runs Not right), within species, = frequency. deer found ROH other patterns (against to time left). left), deep (middle span genus, deer analyses deer roe (2020)’s roe al. the et interaction of Jong the de examine 3: (2020) Figure al. et Jong [ de ( deer population. roe will the drift in in capreolus). genetic environmental forces selection new Finally, these natural to size. adapted population of of become size can on efficacy population impacting population the populations. the also impacts within impact However, potentially Pleistocene) selection, diversity drift. the natural genetic genetic through through contemporary of conditions periods of strength glacial-interglacial relative patterns the to (e.g. and contributing environment forces the changing of A Some selection, 2: and Figure demography in ( of deer species impact roe focal the of ( evolution consider of [ the levels only and during taxonomic not scales multiple general, time (2020) at to- in different analyses demography al. at dynamics genomic acted et and evolutionary forces Jong selection these of de how natural understanding study, but both this our In considering to of add Therefore, particular. importance greatly relative 1963). ( can the size Crow, gether population selection: & effective natural Maruyama, reduced influences (Kimura, with directly increases also processes population stochastic a of demography historical .capreolus C. i.3ulae eaaeya pdf as separately uploaded 3 Fig. pdf as separately uploaded 2 Fig. ouain ogi ute nihsit eetslcinaddmgahchsoy including history, demographic and selection recent into insights further gain to populations ) i 3 Fig i.3 Fig. Capreolus .Interestingly, ). eandol nErpa o er oteecuinee fSbra o deer. roe Siberian of even exclusion the to deer, roe European in only retained ) Capreolus ] ] mdl ih) h iegneo h uoenadSiberian and European the of divergence the right), (middle Pard3 p.,fcsigpriual nErpa o deer roe European on particularly focussing spp.), loitrcswt eea ee eJn ta.(00 found (2020) al. et Jong de genes several with interacts also i.3 Fig. 2 ). g09868 N e eefudt eudrpositive under be to found gene a , ,lmtn h ffiayo selection of efficacy the limiting ), arou pygargus Capreolus N e o h athl-ilo years half-million last the for Pard3 Capreolus eepotentially gene a , p.,through spp.), ,d oget Jong de ), Capreolus (C. Posted on Authorea 13 May 2020 — CC-BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158938626.63090753 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. iua ,Mrym,T rw F 16) h uainlla nsalpopulations. small in load mutational The (1963). JF. Crow, the 1303–1312. T, during Maruyama, dynamics M, population Kimura, and fluctuations range in change, transitions Ecological evolutionary promoting (2009). Pleistocene. adaptation J. and Stewart, Pleistocene. Demography M, to the Hofreiter, (2020). during due diversified al. are et that speciation Y, genus Qin, mammalian of Z, a islands Li, genomic M, Jong, that de suggests flow. Reanalysis gene reduced rate not (2014). diversity, recombination MW. reduced and Hahn, continuum TE, selection Anglia. speciation Cruickshank, East Linked the in across Deer (2015). differentiation (1993). of N. al. Chapman, landscape et genomic CF. the of Mugal, evolution of T, the Kawakami, drive A, variation Nater, to R, lead Burri, can combining data scale how genomic process. population demonstrates evolutionary As a elegantly the References at of study species. sequencing points this time a representation different reduced within species, at with differentiation insights non-model analyses and the for genomics diversity in available considering comparative about even genetic how readily information present, of richer shaping demonstrate more to provide overview they forces can past comprehensive become points so, driving from a transition provide doing deer multiple main at they roe In the selection broadly, of natural More window genomes scales. and history a drift. the time demographic provide genetic influencing different to pronounced feature datasets at of consistent taxonomic demography face different a and from is data selection selection genomic of that use interaction (2020) timeframes. the realistic al. into to et anchored Jong events the robustly de demographic (e.g. summary, allowing more datasets In datasets), be and sequencing to opportunity analyses) genome powerful data spectra whole a genomic frequency founding versus present from site could anthropogenic loci inferred Anglia (e.g. RADseq equivocal, Hahn, East methods of somewhat & to both spectra be deer Cruickshank for mutational might roe 2015; rates associ- case mutation European al., or this calibrating of et population for reintroduction in (Burri ancestral the selection features shared as for genomic consistent such the evidence events shared these in the others to that selection While linked and note to diversity population to due 2014). of this important be patterns in is also with selection it could However, ated putative selection of Germany). apparent France, patterns of founding (Scotland, consistent signatures anthropogenic uncover study an and (2020) this with demography in al. associated investigating 1993), included et the bottleneck for Chapman Jong pronounced deer; point Given de of a data pairs even event. powerful founded. six overcome particularly to anthropogenically could a (three selection was century was group whether 18th founding population population the late isolated Anglia of the relatively size by East this and England the timing, of (Germany), much 1884, source throughout Around known from extirpated were 1993). deer (Chapman, roe European Anglia. ( East data RADseq using sampled tions Ficedula flycatchers. urn Biology Current eoeResearch Genome 9,R584–R594. , 19 , i.3 Fig. oeua Ecology Molecular 5,1656–1665. , 25 , .I on o hyicue atclryitrsigpopulation: interesting particularly a included they so, doing In ). rnatoso h uokNtrlss Society Naturalists’ Suffolk the of Transactions 3 oeua Ecology Molecular 3,3133–3157. , 23 , 9,XXX–XXX. , 29 , 9,1 pp. 11 , 29 , Genetics 8, 48 , Posted on Authorea 13 May 2020 — CC-BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158938626.63090753 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. demography Analyses of Analyses of size impacts size Evolutionary Evolutionary historical selection transitions Time Data Population sequencing Watterson’s theta Site populations Present European roe deer associated DNA Tajima’s Tajima’s D/ Restriction site spectra - MAF frequency ROH/ LD (RAD

-

Seq)

differentiation Population Population environment Changing Changing European Genetic roe deer Siberian roe deer ROH Genome vs. drif

4 species

-

PSMC ( PSMC

wide diversity/ROH roe deer deer roe Diverging of of Diverging dN t N Whole genome sequence Capreolus (roe deer) / e dS Genus ) ( CodeML Paralogs )/

TreeSAAP

Capreolus Diverging of of Diverging selection (“New (“New World”) Natural Natural Capreolinae Mule deer Roe deer Roe Reindeer Moose Family Cervidae (“Old World”) (“Old Fallow deer Elk/Wapiti Cervinae Munjac (deer) Chital Outgroup Cow Past