<<

West Core Strategy

Topic Paper SETTLEMENT HIERARCHY

July 2010

Iti IsIiii’ 2

1

Preferr?d

2. West

Thatcham Urban Newbury Eastern

Background Discussion

SUMMARY

Berkshire

Area

• •

• •

Urban

Paper:

Approach

The settlement The Calcot Four

for on The Paper: individual The Hierarchy settlements Based and

the (CS3) SP1

Following

a

consideration

Settlement

Location Area

Preferred settlements

Discussion inclusion original Hermitage Compton Bradfleld Cold Kintbury Mortimer

Hungerford

options cycle Options with

A

from

should

on

Rural

the

Ash

settlements, the

in - consultation

route, hierarchy.

the Settlement

for

(as

methodology

2008,

Settlement

for

of

addition

settlement

Hierarchy of

be Sduthend

Option

Development

Common

Development

set

Paper2

a

Options

population,

of

in

identified

in Mortimer Lambourn Theale

Hungerford Burghfield Pangbourne

District-wide

further

Newbury,

out

the response

for

Hierarchy

of

the

on Topic

in

Settlement

2008)

Hierarchy

for the

the

hierarchy

the

for

strengthens

in

the

following

within

the

the

proximity

Common

approximate

settlement

Paper

Thatcham,

determining

to

Rural

(CS2)

was

Preferred

for

settlement

Rural

Future’

the

West

the

sufficiently

2010

Hierarchy methodology

Settlement

consultation

Areas, Aldermaston West Ashmore

list East Great Hampstead East Curridge Streatley Upper and Upper

top

to

Berkshire,

the

were

of

hierarchy

Options

major

the Purley

tier

Garston llsley

number

the

llsley May rural

hierarchy

methodology.

Shefford

Basildon

District

of

combined

Options:

5I

hierarchy

robust. Green 2008.

Aldermaston Great Woolhampton Cold Bradfield Compton Kintbury Hermitage Chieveley

urban

May

Hierarchy

settlements

any

on

on Norreys

and

the

Wharf

is of

Thames,

2008.

Ash

District

the

were detailed

Settlement

Shefford

new

policy

investigations

centres,

WWeflr

of Rural into

Southend

homes

Background1

identified.

rural

approaches

wide

are

Spatial

Tilehurst

in

Settlement

and

Option

suitable

Hierarchy

to

location

be

of

Policy

*.

and

3:

for

3 Settlement HierarchyTopic Paper 2010

delivered at each level of hierarchy, previously outlined in the Housing Distribution policy (CS8).

District Settlement Hierarchy as set out in the Core Strategy (Policy SPI) Urban Wide range of services and the focus for Newbury, Thatcham, Areas the majority of development - delivery of Eastern Urban Area approximately 6,900 new homes , Calcot and ) Rural Range of services and reasonable public Burghfleld Common, Service transport provision - opportunities to Hungerford, Lambourn, Centres strengthen role in meeting requirements of Mortimer, Pangbourne, surrounding communities - delivery of Theale approximately 2,000 new homes Service More limited range of services and some Aldermaston, Bradfield Villages limited development potential - delivery of Southend, Chieveley, Cold

. approximately 1,100 new homes. Ash, Compton, Great

: Shefford, Hermitage,

i Kintbury, Woolhampton

4