Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Table of Contents Travel Forecasting Model User’s Guide prepared for Maryland Transit Administration Baltimore, Maryland prepared by William G. Allen, Jr., P.E. Transportation Consultant Mitchells, Virginia 21 August 2006 Revised November 2006 Travel Forecasting Model User’s Guide page i 21 August 2006 Table of Contents page 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................1 1.1 History ..............................................................................................................1 1.2 Model Overview .............................................................................................2 1.3 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................6 2.0 Overview ......................................................................................................................7 2.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................7 2.2 File Naming .....................................................................................................7 2.3 Directory Structure .........................................................................................9 2.4 Basic Files .........................................................................................................9 2.5 Scenario Input Files.......................................................................................15 2.6 User Interface .................................................................................................16 3.0 Land Use .....................................................................................................................21 3.1 Zone Numbering ...........................................................................................21 3.2 Definitions and File Layout .........................................................................21 4.0 Highway Network ....................................................................................................25 4.1 Definitions ......................................................................................................25 4.2 Area Type Model ..........................................................................................28 4.3 Supplemental Files ........................................................................................28 5.0 Transit Network ........................................................................................................33 5.1 Line Coding ...................................................................................................33 5.2 Guideway Coding .........................................................................................37 5.3 Access Coding ...............................................................................................39 5.4 Fares ................................................................................................................39 5.5 Other Coding Guidelines .............................................................................42 6.0 External Trips ............................................................................................................43 6.1 Cordon Volumes ...........................................................................................43 6.2 Through Trips ................................................................................................45 7.0 Output Files ...............................................................................................................47 8.0 Reporting ....................................................................................................................61 8.1 General ............................................................................................................61 8.2 Highway .........................................................................................................61 8.3 Transit .............................................................................................................66 Travel Forecasting Model User’s Guide page ii 21 August 2006 9.0 Summit .......................................................................................................................70 10.0 Run Statistics ..............................................................................................................80 Appendix A SQZ Documentation .....................................................................................85 Appendix B TGFLOAD Notes ...........................................................................................90 Appendix C TPP2UB Notes ...............................................................................................91 Appendix D Setup to Create COGTRN.MTX ..................................................................92 Appendix E Model Steps ....................................................................................................94 Appendix F Transit Access Coding Guidelines ..............................................................98 Travel Forecasting Model User’s Guide page iii 21 August 2006 List of Tables page 2.1 File Names and Formats ............................................................................................8 2.2 Basic Files ...................................................................................................................10 2.3 Model Parameters .....................................................................................................11 2.4 Base Year Through Trips..........................................................................................12 2.5 Example SQZ Zone/District Equivalency .............................................................13 2.6 Mode Choice Coefficient Names ............................................................................14 2.7 Basic Input Files Relating to the Zone System ......................................................15 2.8 Scenario Input Files...................................................................................................15 3.1 Zone System ...............................................................................................................21 3.2 Land Use File Layout ................................................................................................22 3.3 Truck Zone Codes .....................................................................................................22 3.4 Land Use Totals .........................................................................................................24 4.1 Highway Network Fields ........................................................................................26 4.2 Link Usage Restrictions ............................................................................................27 4.3 Facility Type Codes ..................................................................................................27 4.4 Jurisdiction Codes .....................................................................................................27 4.5 Area Type Model ......................................................................................................28 4.6 Year 2000 Toll Link File ............................................................................................29 5.1 Transit Line Codes ....................................................................................................33 5.2 2000 Transit Lines .....................................................................................................34 5.3 Guideway Coding .....................................................................................................39 5.4 MARC Fares (2000) ...................................................................................................41 5.5 MARC Fare Adjustments .........................................................................................41 5.6 Transfer Link Distances............................................................................................42 6.1 External Volumes ......................................................................................................44 6.2 Base Through Trip Ends ..........................................................................................46 7.1 Output Files ...............................................................................................................47 8.1 Transit Trip Tables ....................................................................................................62 8.2 2000 Highway Report ...............................................................................................64 Travel Forecasting Model User’s Guide page iv 21 August 2006 8.3 Transit Assignment Report (excerpts) ...................................................................68 9.1 Sample Summit Setup File .......................................................................................74 9.2 Summit Report File (excerpts) .................................................................................77 10.1 Run Statistics ..............................................................................................................80 Travel Forecasting Model User’s Guide page v 21 August 2006 List of Figures page 4.1 2000 Area Types ........................................................................................................31 4.2 2030 Area Types
Recommended publications
  • LOCAL BUS Full Time 21 5
    EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 8, 2009 INSTRUCCIONES: INSTRUCTIONS Cómo utilizar los horarios de la How to Use the MTA Timetables Administración de Transporte de Maryland (MTA) Timetables should be read left to right for stops and down for times: Los horarios deben leerse de izquierda a derecha para las paradas y SINAI HOSPITAL hacia abajo para los horarios: 1. Select correct day of the week and destination of travel. MONDAWMIN METRO STA. 1. Seleccione el día de la semana correcto y el destino del viaje. 2. Select the location closest to your boarding point, then read down 1 FORTL McHENRY 2. Seleccione la ubicación más cercana a su punto de abordaje, luego to the time a bus will be at this location. LEGEND: TimepointL 1 busque debajo el horario en que el autobús se encontrará en 3. All bus stops are not shown in the timetable or on the map. A 1 1 LINE dicha ubicación. 4. Destinations are shown to the right of your starting point. Selected Service to/from 1 Mondawmin Metro Sta. 3. El horario o el mapa no indican todas las paradas del autobús. 5. Route patterns, express and supplemental seasonal services are Selected Service via 4. Los destinos se indican hacia la derecha de su punto de salida. noted in footnotes. 27 1 SINAI HOSPITAL 1 Coldspring-Newtown LOCAL BUS Full Time 21 5. Los recorridos, servicios expresos y suplementarios en días especiales 6. All times are approximate. Sinai Hospital Connecting Bus Routes MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION NORTHERN PKWY. Peak Only 6 L 44 se detallan en las notas al pie.
    [Show full text]
  • Multifamily Rental Market Assessment
    RealPropertyResearchGroup Multifamily Rental Market Assessment Frederick County, Maryland Date: April 2010 Prepared for: Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development Community Development Administration BRAC Market Study Services Contract 10400 LITTLE PATUXENT PARKWAY SUITE 450 VOICE 410.772.1004 COLUMBIA, MARYLAND 21044 FAX 410.772.1110 RealPropertyResearchGroup April 16, 2010 Ms. Patricia Rynn Sylvester Director, Multifamily Housing Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development 100 Community Place Crownsville, Maryland 21032-2023 and Ms. Jenny Short Director Frederick County Department of Housing and Community Development 520 North Market Street Frederick, Maryland 21701 RE: Frederick County Multifamily Rental Market Assessment Dear Ms. Sylvester and Ms. Short: We are pleased to present our comprehensive assessment of the Multifamily Rental Market in Frederick County, Maryland. This is the first of two deliverables under our contract with the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development (the “Department”). The second deliverable will be an electronic database of the inventory of multifamily rental properties in Frederick County with a ranking of the properties in order of feasibility for preservation as affordable housing. This assignment is part of the Maryland Preservation Compact, a partnership between the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, MD-DHCD and the eight subject Maryland counties: Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Cecil, Frederick, Harford, Howard, Prince George’s and St. Mary’s Counties. The Compact seeks to preserve the existing stock of affordable rental housing in Maryland in areas anticipated to be impacted by growth stemming from the US Department of Defense’s ongoing efforts to expand military installations throughout the state. Maryland stands to gain more military, civilian and mission contractor personnel than any other state under the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) recommendations approved by the President and Congress in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Metropolitan Region Transportation Demand Management
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN REGION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT RESOURCE GUIDE AND STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN Version 12.0 FY09 Final Report December 2008 PREPARED BY: COG/TPB Staff in conjunction with the COMMUTER CONNECTIONS REGIONAL TDM MARKETING GROUP - Table of Contents - FY09 TDM Resource Guide and SMP ~ Section One ~ Background……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 4 Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 6 Regional Activity Centers………………………………………………………………………………………Page 8 Mission Statement ………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 9 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 10 Guiding Principles of Strategic Marketing Plan……………………………………………………………Page 12 Key Findings and Strategic Implications……………………………………………………………………Page 13 Summary of Proposed Strategy for FY 2009…………………………………………………………………Page 15 ~ Section Two ~ Regional Profile……………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 17 Product Profiles……………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 19 Carpools and Vanpools…………………………………………………………………………………………Page 20 HOV Lanes………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 23 Transit…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 30 Table – Summary of Bus Activity………………………………………………………………………………Page 32 Table – Summary of Rail Activity………………………………………………………………………………Page 36 Table - Summary of Park & Ride Activity………………………………………………………………………Page 38 Telework………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 40 Bicycling………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 42 Bike Sharing……………………………………………………………….…….…………..………..….Page 45 Car Sharing………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page
    [Show full text]
  • Concept of Operations for the I-270 Corridor in Montgomery County
    USDOT Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Initiative Concept of Operations for the I-270 Corridor in Montgomery County, Maryland March 31, 2008 FHWA-JPO-08-002 EDL Number 14388 Cover Image Credits: Telvent Farradyne Image Library (Bus, Operations Center, Message Sign), Parsons Brinckerhoff Image Library (MARC Train, Metro Train), and Google Earth (I-270 Map) Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The U.S. Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. USDOT periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-JPO-08-002 EDL Number 14388 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Concept of Operations for the I-270 Corridor in Montgomery March 31, 2008 County, Maryland 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Montgomery County Pioneer Site Team 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter I Purpose and Need
    CHAPTER I Purpose and Need CORRIDOR CITIES TRANSITWAY SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Chapter I Chapter I – Purpose and Need Introduction needs along a 30-mile corridor that extends from This chapter discusses the purpose and need for the Rockville, Maryland at the intersection of I-370 and CCT transit project as originally established within I-270 north into Frederick County and the City of the Purpose and Need of the I-270/US 15 Multi- Frederick, Maryland to the intersection of US 15 and Modal Study. A “Purpose and Need” statement is Biggs Ford Road. The CCT is a proposed Bus Rapid required as part of all NEPA documents for transit Transit (BRT) or Light Rail Transit (LRT) line that and highway projects. To assist in selecting the Locally extends 14 to 16 miles from Shady Grove Metrorail Preferred Alternative (LPA), the Purpose and Need Station in Rockville, Maryland to a terminus just south provides the project goals and objectives by which the of Clarksburg, Maryland at the COMSAT facility, an various alternatives will be evaluated. The Purpose abandoned communications satellite industrial site that and Need describes those factors and conditions in is identified for future transit-oriented development. The the local environment that are driving the need for a I-270/US 15 project study area is shown in Figure I-1. transportation improvement – essentially providing the The CCT study area is shown in Figure I-2. context for a decision on the LPA. Once the LPA is selected, final design and environmental analysis work can be done to allow the project to move toward construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Transit Services Washington Metrorail
    Effective January 14, 2013 Connecting Transit Services Station and Fort Meade), Route 204 (FDA White Oak facility and University BRUNSWICK LINE EASTBOUND Monday through Friday only FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON MARC of Maryland-College Park). The 201 bus operates 7 days a week with hourly Washington Metrorail and Metrobus,SCHEDULES, FARES AND OTHER SERVICES, 202-637-7000: TRAIN NUMBER P870 P890 P872 P874 P892 P876 P878 P894 P880 service; the other two routes operate Monday-Friday. AR/ S/Q Q Q S/Q S/Q Q S/Q S/Q S/Q www.wmata.com CALL 1-800-325-RAIL. City/AM-PM DP AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM Metropolitan Grove Effective January 14, 2013 Montgomery County Ride-On bus service, 240-777-0311: Martinsburg, WV DP 5:00 5:25 6:25 TTY Information 1-410-539-3497 Ride-On Route 61 (from Shady Grove Metro). Duffields DP 5:16 5:41 6:41 www.rideonbus.com FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON MARC BRUNSWICK LINE EASTBOUND Monday through Friday only www.mta.maryland.gov Harpers Ferry, WV DP 5:25 5:50 6:50 Germantown SCHEDULES, FARES AND OTHER SERVICES, TRAIN NUMBER P870SilverP890 SpringP872 P874 P892 P876 P878Train Status: www.marctracker.comP894 P880 Brunswick, MD DP 4:50 5:40 6:05 6:40 7:05 7:45 Ride-On Routes 100/97 (ShadyCALL 1-800-325-RAIL. Grove Metro via. Germantown Transit Frederick DP 5:00 6:05 7:10 AR/ S/QWashingtonQ Q MetroS/Q RedS/Q Line, QnumerousS/Q MetrobusS/Q S/Q and Ride-On routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore Metro Impact Study
    TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 51 BALTIMORE METRO IMPACT STUDY: DOCUMENTATION OF BASELINE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OPERATION Author & Project Manager: Gene Bandy Contributing Authors: Carl Dederer Carl Ruskin Emery Hines Mark Goldstein Assi stant Di rector, Transportation Planning: Charles Goodman Director of Transportation: Joel Reightler MAY 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. Introduction and Purpose A. Purpose of Impact Study B. Background C. Section A Metro Rail Line Description II. Baltimore Region and Northwest Corridor Demographic Perspective A. Profile of Baltimore Region and Northwest Corridor Impact Area B. Soci o-Economic Characteristics for the Baltimore Region and the Section A Study Area III. Travel Characteristics A. Impact Corridor vs. Baltimore Region B. Existing Travel Orientation of Northwest Transit Riders C. Traffic Characteristics D. Automobile and Transit Travel Times E. Person Trips Into Metrocenter F. Parking Data at Metro Stations IV. Land Development Characteristics of the Impact Corridor . A. Residential Land Activity B. Commercial Land Activity C. TSADAS Plans V. Station Area Profiles A. Reisterstown Plaza Station B. Mondawmin Station C. Metrocenter-State Center, Lexington Market and Charles Center Stations i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.) Page VI. Environmental Considerations 35 A. Noise Measurement B. Energy Consumption VII. Community Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Metro VIII. Summary of Findings and Next Steps A. Pre-Opening Characteristics B. Post-Opening Data Collection C. Incremental Assessment of Section B Impact IX. Appendices A. Planning for Rapid Transit in the Baltimore Region B. Traffic Count Data C. Auto Occupancy Counts D. Turning Movement Locations E. Parking Data at Metro Station Areas F. Residential Land Activity: 1970, 1975 and 1980 Lusk's Reports Summary G.
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT MTA CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Maryland Transit Administration -- Line 1 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM PROJECT: MARC Maintenance, Layover, and Storage Facilities
    MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL PROGRAM SUMMARY ($ MILLIONS) SIX-YEAR FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Construction Program Major Projects 501.2 543.9 561.4 311.0 239.9 237.2 2,394.6 System Preservation Minor Projects 108.4 82.5 80.7 57.0 71.4 124.6 524.5 Development & Evaluation Program 6.6 2.0 0.9 0.5 0.4 2.8 13.1 SUBTOTAL 616.2 628.3 642.9 368.6 311.8 364.5 2,932.3 Capital Salaries, Wages & Other Costs 8.7 12.5 12.5 13.0 14.0 14.0 74.7 TOTAL 624.9 640.8 655.4 381.6 325.8 378.5 3,007.0 Special Funds 152.1 119.6 197.0 146.2 137.8 130.3 882.9 Federal Funds 418.1 488.1 365.0 234.6 187.1 247.5 1,940.4 Other Funding 54.7 33.2 93.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 183.7 MARC Freight Light Rail Baltimore Metro Bus Multi-Modal Locally Operated Transit Systems MDOT MTA CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Maryland Transit Administration -- Line 1 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM PROJECT: MARC Maintenance, Layover, and Storage Facilities DESCRIPTION: Planning, environmental documentation, design, property acquisition, and construction of maintenance, layover, and storage facilities. Includes design and construction funding for storage tracks at the MARC Martin State Airport facility, the acquisition and construction of a heavy maintenance building at the Riverside, and the purchase of the Brunswick Maintenance Facility. PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT: Projects will provide critically needed storage and maintenance facilities for the MARC fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Study
    Transportation Study Prepared By: Michael Baker Jr., Inc. Prepared For: City of Charles Town, WV Hagerstown/Eastern Panhandle MPO 4/23/2014 Project Report | Charles Town Transportation Study THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ii Project Report | Charles Town Transportation Study TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: Introduction 1 SECTION 2: Inventory of Transportation System 1 Roadway Classification 1 Traffic Control Devices 4 Traffic Volumes 5 Freight Rail 8 Passenger Rail 8 Transit Bus Service 8 Other Regional Transit Services in Jefferson County 10 Trails and Sidewalk Systems 11 SECTION 3: Land Use and Commuting Patterns 11 Land Use and Transportation 11 Land Use and Zoning 13 Demographics 13 Commuting Characteristics 15 Forecasted Land use 17 SECTION 4: Traffic Congestion and Safety Needs 19 Public and Stakeholder Comments 19 GPS Data Assessment of Existing Traffic Congestion 20 Crash Data 20 Assessing Future Congestion Needs 22 SECTION 5: Recommended Projects and Strategies 29 Transportation Projects 29 Transportation Project Costs 34 Transportation Project Implementation 34 Transit Strategies 34 Bike/Pedestrian Improvements 37 i Project Report | Charles Town Transportation Study THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ii Project Report | Charles Town Transportation Study SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION This transportation plan for the City of Charles Town, West Virginia provides data, analyses, and project recommendations that will be integrated into the city’s comprehensive plan. Specific components of this planning effort include an assessment of the effectiveness of the existing roadway system considering present and future land use, as well as the identification of transportation projects needed to address roadway deficiencies within the city’s urban growth boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Network Directory
    TTrraannssppoorrttaattiioonn NNeettwwoorrkk DDiirreeccttoorryy for People with Disabilities and Seniors A Comprehensive Community Guide to Public, Private, and Non‐Profit Transportation Montgomery County, Maryland September, 2014 SEE BACK FOR INFORMATION ON REQUESTING ALTERNATIVE FORMATS SUCH AS BRAILLE AND LARGE PRINT. www.montgomerycountymd.gov/tnd INTRODUCTION This guide, Transportation Network Directory for People with Disabilities and Seniors, is a comprehensive listing of public, private and non-profit transportation in the Washington Metropolitan Region, State of Maryland, and beyond that can be used by everyone in the community with an emphasis on people with disabilities and older adults. The Commission on People with Disabilities of the Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Transportation compiled this listing of useful transportation services to assist County residents to better coordinate their transportation needs. Now finding information about transportation services is easier than ever with this resource guide. You will find that this guide is divided into 19 informative sections. The Public Transportation section covers such important services as: Call ‘N’ Ride, Medicaid Transportation, Same-Day-Access Program, MetroAccess, Ride On and Metrobus transportation. To assist us in alleviating traffic congestion, we encourage you to use public transportation whenever you can. These programs offer subsidies and reduced fares for older adults and people with disabilities. To find out more information about these services, read the brief description and call the offices listed for additional information. If you need a companion to drive you to necessary appointments, look in the section on Escorted Transportation to find information about various services available to take you to your appointments.
    [Show full text]
  • August 12, 2017 ACCESSIBILITY GUIDE in An
    August 12, 2017 ACCESSIBILITY GUIDE In an effort to provide a positive experience for all, AFRAM is a fully accessible event and this Accessibility Guide is designed to help everyone experience the festival fully, regardless of ability. Please direct any questions to the AFRAM Committee via [email protected] or (410) 396-3835. FESTIVAL DATES & TIMES: Saturday, August 12 from 10am-8pm; Druid Hill Park in the Bowl GETTING TO THE FESTIVAL: MDOT MTA - Ride the MTA Maryland to the Baltimore AFRAM Festival! Public Transportation is the most cost-effective way to get to the event. The Mondawmin MetroLink Subway Station is within walking distance to the Festival, and is open until midnight, seven days a week. The closest MTA Bus Lines to the Mondawmin Station are LocalLinks 22, 26, 29, 79, 82, 85, 91, and CityLinks Navy, Yellow and Lime. If connecting by light rail is more convenient, Light RailLink trains operate 7 AM until 11 PM on Saturday August 12th and 11 AM until one hour after the festival ends on Sunday, August 13th. Take the Light RailLink to Cultural Center Station on Howard Street, then transfer to the CityLink Lime, or Yellow, Line Bus on North Eutaw Street. For more options, check the MTA timetables at www.mta.maryland.gov for actual times for your closest boarding location. You may also explore new BaltimoreLink routes online and plan your trip at BaltimoreLink.com. Our friends from Washington D.C. can use public transportation to get to the African American Festival by taking the new MARC Train weekend service to Penn Station.
    [Show full text]
  • MD 355 & MD 85 Transportation Oriented Design
    DIVISION OF PLANNING AND ZONING FREDERICK COUNTY, MARYLAND Winchester Hall 12 East Church Street Frederick County, Maryland 21701 (301) 600-1138 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Eric Soter, Division Director THROUGH: John Thomas, Principal Planner II, Transportation Jim Gugel, Chief of Comprehensive Planning DATE: April 6, 2010 RE: MD 85/MD 355 Transportation Land Use Connections Study ______________________________________________________________________________ ISSUE Funded through the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG) Transportation & Land Use Connections (TLC) Program, the MD 85/MD 355 Transportation Oriented Design Study has been completed. The study and report were prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff consultants. BACKGROUND The research, recommended improvements and public outreach undertaken as part of this study will assist the County in developed a more detailed corridor and community plan for the study area and surrounding land uses. The plan also includes planning level cost estimates and recommended time frames for implementation of suggested improvements. The specific scope of the project included the following: Initial project scoping session with project stakeholders; Setup of a project web site to provide opportunities for public information and public comment including a public comment interactive mapping application; Prepare and implement project and surrounding area employee, commuter, land use surveys; Hosted community workshop to discuss potential changes in land use; Perform an opportunities and constraints analysis with respect to feasible changes in land use in the area; Make recommendations for improvements to the existing project area bicycle, pedestrian and public transportation networks with respect to safety and connectivity; Provide design recommendations for a passenger transfer center in the project area; Production of final report of recommendations, implementation plan and presentation to project sponsor(s) and the general public.
    [Show full text]