Political Reviews • Polynesia 193 Jon Tikivanotau M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Political Reviews • Polynesia 193 Jon Tikivanotau M political reviews • polynesia 193 elections suggests a potential for ended in the late 1990s. France con- dramatic changes to the judicial tinues to transfer massive aid for system and land laws. Unless such development, as much as us$1 billion issues are addressed, the future for a year (PIR, 26 Aug 2002). Flosse the ethnic Mäori of the Cook Islands built himself a monumental presiden- looks uncertain. tial palace that houses “623 employ- jon tikivanotau m jonassen ees and courtiers” and invested public money in many grandiose projects in Tahiti and overseas, but Temaru’s Reference demand for a referendum on inde- pendence is necessarily tempered by CIN, Cook Islands News. Rarotonga. Daily. a vision of ongoing French subsidies and compensation for the impact of nuclear testing. Editor Alex W du Prel of Tahiti-Pacifique Magazine called the situation a “social and economic French Polynesia fiasco” due to “cut and paste pro- Two overriding issues stand out in the grams prepared in Paris for a great past year or so in French Polynesia: industrial country, which French another change of statute, this time Polynesia is certainly not.” The Flosse to a supposedly more autonomous administration, which du Prel said “overseas country” of France rather encouraged only a “consumer society than an “overseas territory,” and a of privileges, of ecological looting surprising assembly election in May and corporatist castes [and] above 2004, which ended the twenty-year all made the rich more rich and reign of Gaston Flosse as president marginalized the part of the popula- and brought into office his longtime tion that remained authentic,” at one pro-independence rival, Oscar point even asked the local people for Temaru. No local leader, however, “fresh ideas” (TPM, July 2004). can easily escape the harsh reality of The number one local industry severe economic dependency caused remained tourism. In 2003, the by the introduction of nuclear testing number of visitors was over 200,000 in the 1960s. French military spending (nearly equaling the local population), distorted the communal Polynesian which represented a recovery from the society and created a middle class that negative impact of the events of 11 fed on French-subsidized government September 2001 on air travel. North jobs and patronage and enriched itself America, and mainly the United through corrupt business monopolies States, provided the largest number of and real estate investments at the visitors, with 77,000 or 40 percent of expense of the laboring majority. the market (and also the largest single French Polynesia, whose capital increase over 2002, about 25 percent); Papeete is on the populous main it was followed closely by Europe, island of Tahiti, is still in quest of a with 74,000 or 38 percent of the post-nuclear economy, since French market; then Japan with 20,000 funding for the former Centre d’Ex- (10 percent); Australia, New Zealand, perimentation du Pacifique (cep) and New Caledonia with 16,000 (8 194 the contemporary pacific • 17:1 (2005) percent); and South America (mainly through the lens of a political system Chile) with 3,800 (2 percent). Despite that is more highly centralized than special efforts to cater to the Japanese many others in the western world. market, such as increasing Tahiti Nui Although the relationship between service to three flights a week to French Polynesia and Paris has been Osaka and Tokyo and holding a described as “similar to that of the scuba-diving exhibition, the number Cook Islands and New Zealand” of Japanese visitors—mainly wedding (De Deckker 1994, 272), many would couples (who spend on average twice dispute just how “self-governing” as much as other tourists and espe- Papeete really is. Temaru complained cially enjoy the over-the-water bunga- that France still controlled foreign lows for honeymoons)—did not quite relations, immigration, external match the previous year (PIR, 4 April communications, currency, finance, 2003; 5 Jan 2004). defense, courts and police, and higher The number two industry, cultured education, among other things (1988, black pearls from the Tuamotu atolls, 279–282). Flosse managed to get the declined drastically in 2003, as prices statute changed twice, first in 1984 dropped by 80 percent. Despite gov- when he became president of the ernment regulatory reforms aimed at new government (and New Caledonia controlling quality, informal trading was in rebellion), and in 1996 after to foreign buyers evaded taxes and the last round of nuclear tests and undercut sellers. The local govern- anticolonial protests, when more ment continued to promote tuna fish- nationalist symbolism was added ing, by increasing the country’s fleet (Von Strokirch 2001). In 1998, when size, as well as vanilla production, New Caledonia’s Noumea Accord a once-profitable export for which promised gradually expanding auton- world prices were increasing (PIR, omy with a prospect of voting on 24 June 2002; 18 Feb, 13 May, 10 independence, Flosse proposed fur- June 2003). State-funded infrastruc- ther expansion of French Polynesia’s ture construction continued to grow, autonomy, to include the favoring of and scholarships for overseas training local citizens in hiring and establish- increased, but government efforts to ing businesses, as well as increasing curb rising deficits in public health the authority of the president and insurance and civil service pension Territorial Assembly (ta). French funds pushed doctors to strike for President Jacques Chirac agreed in a month in 2003 over reduced pay- May 1999, and negotiations began ments, while public workers demon- over a new statute that would confer strated against extending the required the high-sounding but ambiguous number of years for pension contri- label of “overseas country” within butions (PIR, 1 May, 29 May, 9 June, the French republic (PIR, 1 June 12 Aug 2003). 1999; Von Strokirch 2000). French Polynesia has received During a visit to Papeete in August several statutes of autonomy, notably 2002, French Overseas Territories in 1977 and 1984, but French notions Minister Brigitte Girardin said, “With- of “autonomy” are usually defined out French Polynesia, France would political reviews • polynesia 195 not be a great power, and France statute but Flosse wanted to limit the never failed to help Tahiti when discussion of its 194 articles to only needed.” She promised more financial four days. The opposition threatened support from the post-nuclear Eco- to boycott the proceedings if all the nomic Restructuring Fund created in articles were not debated, since the 1996, tax exemptions to encourage new laws would affect the territory for outside investment, and “new politi- decades, but Flosse’s absolute major- cal evolution” that would upgrade ity of 28 of 49 ta seats passed the local administrative power so that statute as he wished, while the oppo- new French laws would not infringe sition sang a nationalist song in the on bills passed by the local assembly public gallery in protest (PIR, 2 July, as long as the latter conformed to the 7 July 2003). Flosse also wanted Paris French constitution and the European to grant French Polynesia a second Union courts. Flosse, a career Gaullist senatorial seat in the French Parlia- closely allied with Chirac (who had ment by 2004, in order to mimic been newly reelected in 2002), com- New Caledonia, but the additional plained about the meddling in French seat will not take effect until 2007 Polynesian lawmaking by the previous (PIR, 14 July 2003). Also in July, Socialist government in Paris, but he Chirac came to the South Pacific, got along well with Gaullist Premier visiting not only the French territories Jean-Pierre Raffarin, who supported but also anglophone ex-colonies and his desire to expand self-government. powers. He said that he wanted “Independence would lead to dicta- France to be a “player” in the region’s torship and misery,” Flosse said, security and development, one that “[but] our autonomy statute was could provide additional assistance meant to evolve” (PIR, 24 June, directly or through the European 24 Aug 2002). By March 2003, Union. Old superpower rivalries were the French Parliament passed some a thing of the past, he said, and now “decentralization” amendments to the a spirit of cooperation should guide constitution, which called overseas the Pacific countries. He supported territories “overseas collectivities.” Australia’s intervention in Solomon Flosse said he would request a further Islands, but Prime Minister John name change to “overseas country” Howard was reluctant to allow and sponsor an organic law that France to take part in that peace- would allow the French Polynesian keeping operation in order to avoid Territorial Assembly to pass its own making the exercise appear “neo- “laws of the country,” protect local colonial” (PIR, 3 July, 29 July 2003). job hiring, enable French Polynesia Chirac suggested that French Poly- to share more governing powers with nesia be given observer status at the Paris, and contest any new French Pacific Islands Forum, as New Caledo- laws that interfered with its own nia had, but at their Auckland meet- authority (PIR, 20 March, 27 May, ing the Forum countries expressed 7 July 2003). mixed feelings. Temaru and Rock In July 2003, the Territorial Assem- Wamytan of New Caledonia had bly began to debate the proposed new criticized France’s “checkbook diplo- 196 the contemporary pacific • 17:1 (2005) macy” and warned that the Flosse of French Polynesia’s “own” money regime was a “Trojan horse” for to the fund, though he was already French interests. Unlike New Caledo- under investigation for trying to nia, whose Noumea Accord specifi- spread influence by “humanitarian” cally mentioned the prospect of inde- aid giving in the region (PIR, 30 July, pendence, French Polynesia’s new 4 Aug, 8 Aug, 12 Nov 2003; NC, statute contained no such option, 30 July 2003).
Recommended publications
  • Sénat Proposition De Résolution
    N° 428 SÉNAT SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 2008-2009 Annexe au procès-verbal de la séance du 20 mai 2009 PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION tendant à modifier le Règlement du Sénat pour mettre en œuvre la révision constitutionnelle, conforter le pluralisme sénatorial et rénover les méthodes de travail du Sénat, TEXTE DE LA COMMISSION DES LOIS CONSTITUTIONNELLES, DE LÉGISLATION, DU SUFFRAGE UNIVERSEL, DU RÈGLEMENT ET D’ADMINISTRATION GÉNÉRALE (1), (1) Cette commission est composée de : M. Jean-Jacques Hyest, président ; M. Nicolas Alfonsi, Mme Nicole Borvo Cohen-Seat, MM. Patrice Gélard, Jean-René Lecerf, Jean-Claude Peyronnet, Jean-Pierre Sueur, Mme Catherine Troendle, M. François Zocchetto, vice-présidents ; MM. Laurent Béteille, Christian Cointat, Charles Gautier, Jacques Mahéas, secrétaires ; M. Alain Anziani, Mmes Éliane Assassi, Nicole Bonnefoy, Alima Boumediene-Thiery, MM. Elie Brun, François-Noël Buffet, Pierre-Yves Collombat, Jean-Patrick Courtois, Mme Marie-Hélène Des Esgaulx, M. Yves Détraigne, Mme Anne-Marie Escoffier, MM. Pierre Fauchon, Louis-Constant Fleming, Gaston Flosse, Christophe-André Frassa, Bernard Frimat, René Garrec, Jean-Claude Gaudin, Mmes Jacqueline Gourault, Virginie Klès, MM. Antoine Lefèvre, Dominique de Legge, Mme Josiane Mathon-Poinat, MM. Jacques Mézard, Jean-Pierre Michel, François Pillet, Hugues Portelli, Roland Povinelli, Bernard Saugey, Simon Sutour, Richard Tuheiava, Alex Türk, Jean-Pierre Vial, Jean-Paul Virapoullé, Richard Yung. Voir le(s) numéro(s) : Sénat : 377 et 427 (2008-2009) - 3 - PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION TENDANT À MODIFIER LE RÈGLEMENT DU SÉNAT POUR METTRE EN ŒUVRE LA RÉVISION CONSTITUTIONNELLE, CONFORTER LE PLURALISME SÉNATORIAL ET RÉNOVER LES MÉTHODES DE TRAVAIL DU SÉNAT Article 1er Composition du Bureau du Sénat I.
    [Show full text]
  • Du Premier Au Second Gouvernement Temaru: Une Annee De Crise Politique Et Institutionnelle
    1 DU PREMIER AU SECOND GOUVERNEMENT TEMARU: UNE ANNEE DE CRISE POLITIQUE ET INSTITUTIONNELLE Emmanuel­Pie Guiselin * Il arrive parfois que le temps politique s’accélère. Pour la Polynésie française, une page clef de l’histoire vient de s’écrire avec le retour au pouvoir de l’Union pour la démocratie (UPLD) et de son leader Oscar Temaru. Ce retour est intervenu à la faveur des élections partielles du 13 février 2005, moins de cinq mois après que le premier gouvernement Temaru ait été renversé par une motion de censure. Entre l’UPLD et le Tahoeraa Huiraatira, entre Oscar Temaru et Gaston Flosse, le cadre statutaire et le mode de scrutin ont constitué la toile de fond d’un combat plus profond mettant aux prises légalité et légitimité. Sometimes the political tempo of a country speeds up. In the case of French Polynesia, a major chapter in its history was written with the return to power of the Union for Democracy party (UPLD) and its leader Oscar Temaru. This came about as a result of the partial elections of 13 February 2005, that is less than 5 months after the first Temaru government had been ousted by a censure motion. Between UPLD and Tahoeraa Hiuraatira, between Oscar Temaru and Gaston Flosse, the legal framework and the voting system created the backdrop for a significant battle concerning legality and legitimacy. 27 février 2004, 7 mars 2005 1. Un peu plus de douze mois séparent ces deux dates, la première marquant la promulgation de la loi organique relative au nouveau statut d’autonomie de la Polynésie française 2, la seconde portant présentation du second gouvernement constitué par Oscar Temaru.
    [Show full text]
  • Format Acrobat
    N° 130 SÉNAT SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 2008-2009 Annexe au procès-verbal de la séance du 10 décembre 2008 RAPPORT D’INFORMATION FAIT au nom de la commission des Lois constitutionnelles, de législation, du suffrage universel, du Règlement et d'administration générale (1) à la suite d’une mission d’information effectuée en Polynésie française du 21 avril au 2 mai 2008, Par MM. Christian COINTAT et Bernard FRIMAT, Sénateurs. (1) Cette commission est composée de : M. Jean-Jacques Hyest, président ; M. Nicolas Alfonsi, Mme Nicole Borvo Cohen-Seat, MM. Patrice Gélard, Jean-René Lecerf, Jean-Claude Peyronnet, Jean-Pierre Sueur, Mme Catherine Troendle, M. François Zocchetto, vice-présidents ; MM. Laurent Béteille, Christian Cointat, Charles Gautier, Jacques Mahéas, secrétaires ; M. Alain Anziani, Mmes Éliane Assassi, Nicole Bonnefoy, Alima Boumediene-Thiery, MM. Elie Brun, François-Noël Buffet, Pierre-Yves Collombat, Jean-Patrick Courtois, Mme Marie-Hélène Des Esgaulx, M. Yves Détraigne, Mme Anne-Marie Escoffier, MM. Pierre Fauchon, Louis-Constant Fleming, Gaston Flosse, Christophe-André Frassa, Bernard Frimat, René Garrec, Jean-Claude Gaudin, Mmes Jacqueline Gourault, Virginie Klès, MM. Antoine Lefèvre, Dominique de Legge, Mme Josiane Mathon-Poinat, MM. Jacques Mézard, Jean-Pierre Michel, François Pillet, Hugues Portelli, Roland Povinelli, Bernard Saugey, Simon Sutour, Richard Tuheiava, Alex Türk, Jean-Pierre Vial, Jean-Paul Virapoullé, Richard Yung. - 3 - SOMMAIRE Pages EXAMEN EN COMMISSION.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RCT Le Vote Final Du Senat
    NOTE N°29 : ADELS/UNADEL L’ultime lecture devant le Sénat à partir du texte de la Commission Mixte Paritaire ( 9 novembre 2010). Première partie Le vote final. Le Sénat a adopté définitivement le texte de la réforme des collectivités territoriales, le 9 novembre 2010, par 167 voix pour et 163 voix contre. Les 24 sénateurs communistes et apparentés ont voté contre. Sur les 17 sénateurs du Rassemblement Démocratique et Social Européen, 4 ont voté pour et 13 contre. Les 116 sénateurs socialistes ont voté contre. Les 29 sénateurs de l’Union Centriste se sont divisés : 14 ont voté pour, 6 ont voté contre (Didier Borotra, Marcel Deneux, Jean-Léonce Dupont, Jacqueline Gourault, Jean-Jacques Jégou et Jean-Marie Vanlerenberghe), 7 se sont abstenus (Jean Arthuis, Daniel Dubois, Françoise Féret, Pierre Jarlier, Hervé Maurey, Catherine Morin- Desailly et François Zoccheto). Les sénateurs UMP sont 149. 146 ont voté pour, 2 se sont abstenus (Sylvie Goy-Chavant et Louis Pinton), 1 n’a pas pris part au vote (Mireille Oudit). Sur les 7 non inscrits, 3 ont voté pour (Sylvie Desmurescaux, Gaston Flosse, Alex Türk), 4 ont voté contre. Le vote final de l’Assemblée Nationale aura lieu dans les jours qui viennent. Il n’est qu’une formalité, puisque les députés UMP sont majoritaires à eux seuls. Quelques extraits du débat général Jean-Patrick Courtois (rapporteur pour le Sénat de la Commission Mixte Paritaire). « Composé de trois volets principaux, ce texte vise respectivement à mettre en place des conseillers territoriaux, moyen d’améliorer la coordination entre départements et régions, sans remettre en cause les spécificités de chacune de ces collectivités territoriales, à améliorer le fonctionnement de l’intercommunalité et à clarifier les principes encadrant la répartition des compétences ».
    [Show full text]
  • Sénateurs Département Email M
    Sénateurs Département Email M. Jacques BERTHOU Ain [email protected] M. Rachel MAZUIR Ain [email protected] Mme Sylvie GOY-CHAVENT Ain [email protected] M. Antoine LEFÈVRE Aisne [email protected] M. Pierre ANDRÉ Aisne [email protected] M. Yves DAUDIGNY Aisne [email protected] M. Gérard DÉRIOT Allier [email protected] Mme Mireille SCHURCH Allier [email protected] M. Claude DOMEIZEL Alpes de Haute-Provence [email protected] M. Jean-Pierre LELEUX Alpes-Maritimes [email protected] M. Louis NÈGRE Alpes-Maritimes [email protected] M. Marc DAUNIS Alpes-Maritimes [email protected] M. René VESTRI Alpes-Maritimes [email protected] Mme Colette GIUDICELLI Alpes-Maritimes [email protected] M. Michel TESTON Ardèche [email protected] M. Yves CHASTAN Ardèche [email protected] M. Benoît HURÉ Ardennes [email protected] M. Marc LAMÉNIE Ardennes [email protected] M. Jean-Pierre BEL Ariège [email protected] M. Philippe ADNOT Aube [email protected] M. Yann GAILLARD Aube [email protected] M. Marcel RAINAUD Aude [email protected] M. Roland COURTEAU Aude [email protected] M. Stéphane MAZARS Aveyron [email protected] M. Alain FAUCONNIER Aveyron [email protected] M. André REICHARDT Bas-Rhin [email protected] M. Francis GRIGNON Bas-Rhin [email protected] M. Roland RIES Bas-Rhin [email protected] Mme Esther SITTLER Bas-Rhin [email protected] Mme Fabienne KELLER Bas-Rhin [email protected] M.
    [Show full text]
  • Élections Sénatoriales
    Lundi 29 septembre 2014 DIRECTION DE LA SÉANCE ÉLECTIONS SÉNATORIALES SCRUTIN DU 28 SEPTEMBRE 2014 SÉRIE 2 R É SUL TA TS OFFICIELS DU MINISTÈRE DE L’INTÉRIEUR 2 LISTE DES ABRÉVIATIONS UTILISÉES Nuances politiques individuelles des candidats LIBELLÉ SIGNIFICATION EXG Extrême gauche FG Front de gauche PG Parti de gauche COM Parti Communiste Français SOC Parti Socialiste RDG Parti Radical de Gauche DVG Divers gauche VEC Europe Ecologie Les Verts ECO Ecologiste REG Régionaliste DIV Divers MDM Mouvement démocrate UDI Union des démocrates et indépendants UMP Union pour un Mouvement Populaire DLR Debout la République DVD Divers droite FN Front National EXD Extrême droite 3 LISTE DES ABRÉVIATIONS UTILISÉES Nuances politiques des listes LIBELLÉ SIGNIFICATION LEXG Liste d'extrême gauche LFG Liste présentée par le Front de gauche LCOM Liste présentée par le PCF, hors Front de gauche LPG Liste du Parti de gauche, hors Front de gauche LSOC Liste du Parti Socialiste LVEC Liste présentée par Europe Ecologie Les Verts LRDG Liste présentée par le Parti Radical de Gauche LDVG Liste divers gauche LUG Liste d'union de la gauche LDIV Autre liste LREG Liste régionaliste LMDM Liste présentée par le MoDem LUDI Liste présentée par l'UDI LCEN Liste d'union du centre LUD Liste d'union de la droite et du centre LUMP Liste de l'UMP LDLR Liste Debout la République LDVD Liste divers droite LFN Liste du Front National LEXD Liste d'extrême droite 4 I. – FRANCE MÉTROPOLITAINE 5 01 - AIN Sénateurs sortants : 3 3 sièges à pourvoir M. Jacques BERTHOU (App. Soc.) Représentation proportionnelle Mme Sylvie GOY-CHAVENT (UDI-UC) M.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 8 January 2021 English Original: French
    United Nations A/AC.109/2021/7 General Assembly Distr.: General 8 January 2021 English Original: French Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples French Polynesia Working paper prepared by the Secretariat Contents Page The Territory at a glance ......................................................... 3 I. Constitutional, political and legal issues ............................................ 5 II. Economic conditions ............................................................ 8 A. General ................................................................... 8 B. Agriculture, pearl farming, fisheries and aquaculture ............................. 9 C. Industry .................................................................. 9 D. Transport and communications ............................................... 10 E. Tourism .................................................................. 10 F. Environment .............................................................. 10 III. Social conditions ............................................................... 11 A. General ................................................................... 11 B. Employment .............................................................. 11 C. Education ................................................................. 12 D. Health care ................................................................ 12 IV. Relations with international organizations and
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Evolving Deterrence Discourse
    EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE EDITED BY AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory February 2021 EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE EDITED BY AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory King's College London Science Applications International Corporation February 2021 EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE | 1 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in part under Contract W-7405-Eng-48 and in part under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. ISBN-978-1-952565-09-0 LCCN-2020922986 LLNL-TR-815694 TPG-60099 2 | AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Contents About the Contributors 2 Preface Brad Roberts 7 Introduction Amelia Morgan and Heather Williams 8 The (Incomplete) Return of Deterrence Michael Rühle 13 The German Debate: The Bundestag and Nuclear Deterrence Pia Fuhrhop 27 The Dutch Debate: Activism vs. Pragmatism Michal Onderco 39 French Perspectives on Disarmament and Deterrence Emmanuelle Maitre 51 Nuclear Deterrence and Arms Control: A NATO Perspective Jessica Cox and Joseph Dobbs 66 Defining the Needed Balance of Deterrence and Arms Control in Europe Anna Péczeli 74 Restoring the Balancing Act: Disarmament and Deterrence in the New Era Łukasz Kulesa 93 Rethinking the Impact of Emerging Technologies on Strategic Stability Andrea Gilli and Mauro Gilli 105 Artificial Intelligence and Deterrence: A View from Europe Laura Siddi 121 A Practitioner’s Perspective: Modern Deterrence and the U.S.–U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilingualism in French Polynesia: Past and Future
    Section VI Multilingualism in French Polynesia: Past and future Multilingualism is in its very essence unstable, as it make it possible to perceive major tendencies for involves living languages whose dynamics depend the next 20 to 30 years, with regard to multi- above all on extra-linguistic factors. This funda- lingualism in French Polynesia. The future of lan- mental instability renders virtually impossible any guages in the country as a whole can only be un- prediction beyond two generations. derstood through an analysis archipelago-by- However, the six years of field research that archipelago, and language-by-language. As we will Jean-Michel Charpentier has just carried out in see, knowledge of the recent history of each region French Polynesia in over twenty different locations will enable us to draw up their future perspectives. The Marquesas In the Marquesas Islands, Marquesan remains the As for the third island, Ua Huka, it was essen- daily language for the majority of islanders. The tially depopulated in the 19th century, before being existence of two dialects, with their lexical and repopulated by both northern and southern Mar- phonetic specificities for each island, does not quesans. This is why the island itself is known un- hinder this fundamental linguistic unity. der two different names, Ua Huka (with a /k/ The 2012 census (ISPF 2012) gave a population typical of the northern dialect) and Ua Huna (with of 9,261 for the archipelago, among which two an /n/ typical of southern Marquesan).63 thirds lived in the Northern Marquesas (Nuku Hiva 2,967; Ua Pou 2,175; Ua Huka 621), and one third The island of Hiva Oa, in southern Marquesas, (3,498 inhabitants) lived in the southern part.
    [Show full text]
  • Experts' Opinions on the Current Touristic Situation in French Polynesia
    Trouble in Paradise: Experts’ opinions on the current touristic situation in French Polynesia Céline Perelli A thesis submitted to: Auckland University of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in International Hospitality Management 2013 School of Hospitality and Tourism Supervisors: Dr. Hamish Bremner and Dr. David Williamson i Table of Contents Chapter One: Introduction……………………………………………………………..1 1.0 Research context…………………………………………………………….2 Chapter Two: French Polynesia-The myth unraveled…………………………………9 2.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………...10 2.1 The discovery of Paradise and its colonization…………………………….10 2.2 Tahiti and her islands………………………………………………………13 2.3 Social, cultural and economic background of French Polynesia…………..20 2.3.1 Population………………………………………………………….20 2.3.2 Employment, income and tourism…………………………………21 2.3.3 French financial support…………………………………………...22 2.4 The French government……………………………………………………23 2.5 Tourism and its wastelands………………………………………………...25 Chapter Three: Literature review…………………………………………………….30 3.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………...31 3.1 Destination competitiveness theory………………………………………..31 3.2 Tourism marketing mix…………………………………………………….35 3.3 Strategic planning………………………………………………………….37 3.4 Strategic implementation…………………………………………………..38 3.5 The C.O.S.T strategic plan (Conseil d’Orientation Stratégique du Tourisme)…………………………………………………………………………….40 3.6 The implementation of the C.O.S.T strategic plan………………………...44 Chapter Four: Methodology………………………………………………………….46
    [Show full text]
  • France in the South Pacific Power and Politics
    France in the South Pacific Power and Politics France in the South Pacific Power and Politics Denise Fisher Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Fisher, Denise, author. Title: France in the South Pacific : power and politics / Denise Fisher. ISBN: 9781922144942 (paperback) 9781922144959 (eBook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: France--Foreign relations--Oceania. Oceania--Foreign relations--France. France--Foreign relations--New Caledonia. New Caledonia--Foreign relations--France. Dewey Number: 327.44095 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2013 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgements . vii List of maps, figures and tables . ix Glossary and acronyms . xi Maps . xix Introduction . 1 Part I — France in the Pacific to the 1990s 1. The French Pacific presence to World War II . 13 2. France manages independence demands and nuclear testing 1945–1990s . 47 3 . Regional diplomatic offensive 1980s–1990s . 89 Part II — France in the Pacific: 1990s to present 4. New Caledonia: Implementation of the Noumea Accord and political evolution from 1998 . 99 5. French Polynesia: Autonomy or independence? . 179 6. France’s engagement in the region from the 1990s: France, its collectivities, the European Union and the region .
    [Show full text]
  • Polynésie Française
    United Nations Nations Unies HEADQUARTERS • SIEGE NEW YORK, NY 10017 TEL.; 1 (212) 963.1234 • FAX'. 1 (212) 963.4879 Distr. RESTRICTED P RS/2018/C RR 16 ORIGINAL: FRENCH/ENGLISH THIRD INTERNATIONAL DECADE FOR THE ERADICATION OF COLONIALISM Pacific regional seminar on the implementation of the Third International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism: towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals in the Non-Self-Governing Territories: social, economic and environmental challenges Saint Georgeis, Grenada 9 to 11 May 2018 STATEMENT BY MR. ENGEL RAYGADAS (FRENCH POLYNESIA) franÿaiS/english Expos6 du repr6sentant de la Polyn6sie frangaise Sÿminaire rÿgional pour le Pacifique sur la mise en oeuvre de la troisiÿme Dÿcennie de l'ÿlimination du colonialisme "Towards the achivement of the Sustainable Development Goals in the non-self-governing territories: social, economic and environmental challenges" Saint Georges - Grenade 9 au 11 mai 2018 Monsieur le President du Comitÿ special de dÿcolonisation, Mesdames et Messieurs les reprÿsentants des Etats membres des Nations Unies, Mesdames et Messieurs, - Permettez-moi de remercier chaleureusement le gouvernement et le peuple de la Grenade pour son accueil et son hospitalitY. - M. le President, je fÿlicite votre ÿlection en tant que President du C24 et je suis certain que vous donnerez au comitÿ un souffle nouveau. 1. Evolution du C24 - Je voudrais rendre hommage aux membres de ce comitÿ qui l'ont rejoint parce qu'ils croient vÿritablement que la libertÿ est le principe fondamental de l'autodÿtermination. Je voudrais les remercier pour leurs efforts visant ÿ tirer le comitÿ dans le XXle siÿcle et ÿ engager une nouvelle rÿflexion sur son r61e et sur la maniÿre dont il pourrait ÿvoluer.
    [Show full text]