Europe's Evolving Deterrence Discourse

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Europe's Evolving Deterrence Discourse EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE EDITED BY AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory February 2021 EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE EDITED BY AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory King's College London Science Applications International Corporation February 2021 EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE | 1 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in part under Contract W-7405-Eng-48 and in part under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. ISBN-978-1-952565-09-0 LCCN-2020922986 LLNL-TR-815694 TPG-60099 2 | AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Contents About the Contributors 2 Preface Brad Roberts 7 Introduction Amelia Morgan and Heather Williams 8 The (Incomplete) Return of Deterrence Michael Rühle 13 The German Debate: The Bundestag and Nuclear Deterrence Pia Fuhrhop 27 The Dutch Debate: Activism vs. Pragmatism Michal Onderco 39 French Perspectives on Disarmament and Deterrence Emmanuelle Maitre 51 Nuclear Deterrence and Arms Control: A NATO Perspective Jessica Cox and Joseph Dobbs 66 Defining the Needed Balance of Deterrence and Arms Control in Europe Anna Péczeli 74 Restoring the Balancing Act: Disarmament and Deterrence in the New Era Łukasz Kulesa 93 Rethinking the Impact of Emerging Technologies on Strategic Stability Andrea Gilli and Mauro Gilli 105 Artificial Intelligence and Deterrence: A View from Europe Laura Siddi 121 A Practitioner’s Perspective: Modern Deterrence and the U.S.–U.K. Relationship Peter Watkins 140 Transatlantic Deterrence: Taking Stock and Looking Forward Gregory F Giles 146 EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE | 1 About the Contributors Jessica L. Cox has served as director of nuclear policy at NATO since 2018, before which she served as director for arms control in the U.S. National Security Council and in positions in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, U.S. Depart- ment of Defense. Joseph Dobbs joined the Nuclear Policy Directorate at NATO in July 2020 after serving as a policy analyst to the U.K. House of Lords International Relations and Defence Committee, before which he was a research fellow and project manager at the Europe- an Leadership Network. Pia Fuhrhop has been head of the Berlin office of the Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy (IFSH) since September 2019. She previously worked as a foreign pol- icy advisor to Omid Nouripour, a member of the German Bundestag. Further positions in her professional career were the Science and Politics Foundation in Berlin and the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. In these functions, she is committed to the intensive exchange of science and politics. Her research inter- ests include transatlantic crisis management, particularly in Syria, Afghanistan, and the Balkans. She has dealt intensively with the direction and foundations of German foreign and security policy, from crisis management to the reform of the Bundeswehr. At the Free University of Berlin, she did her doctorate on the role of European alliance partners in transatlantic crisis management. As part of her doctorate, she was a guest researcher at the American Institute for Contemporary Germany Studies (AICGS) in Washington, DC. Greg Giles is a senior director with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), where he advises U.S. government decision makers on issues pertaining to deterrence, nonproliferation, and the Middle East. He has published widely and testi- fied before Congress on these subjects. Giles has guest lectured at the U.S. Air Force and Army War Colleges, as well as the Saudi Arabian War College in Riyadh, and the NATO Defense College in Rome. Prior to joining SAIC in 1989, he worked as a staff assistant in the British House of Commons, the United Nations General Assembly, and the U.S. House and Senate. He has a bachelor’s degree in international studies and political science from Dickinson College and a master’s degree in international affairs from Columbia University. He is a member of the International Institute for Strategic Studies and is the president of Giles Consulting, LLC. 2 | AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Andrea Gilli is a researcher at the NATO Defense College in Rome where he works on defense innovation, military transformation, and armed forces modernization. Gilli holds a Ph.D. in social and political science from the European University Institute (EUI) in Florence. In 2015, he was awarded the European Defence Agency and Egmont Institute’s biannual prize for the best dissertation on European defense, security, and strategy. Gilli has provided consulting services to both private and public organiza- tions, including the E.U. Military Committee and the U.S. Department of Defense’s Office of Net Assessment. He has worked and conducted research for or been asso- ciated with several institutions, including the Royal United Services Institute, the Eu- ropean Union Institute for Security Studies, the Saltzman Institute for War and Peace Studies at Columbia University, the Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC) at Stanford University, and the Belfer Center for Science and International Af- fairs at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. His research has been published or is forthcoming in International Security, Security Studies, The RUSI Journal, and the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage website. Mauro Gilli is a senior researcher in military technology and international security at the Center for Security Studies of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETH-Zurich). He has a Ph.D. in political science from Northwestern University and was a postdoctoral fellow at Dartmouth College’s Dickey Center. He has provided consulting services to both private and public organizations, including the Office of Net Assessment of the U.S. Department of Defense. His research has been published in International Security, Security Studies, Journal of Strategic Studies, Social Science Quarterly, and PlosOne, and has received coverage in The Economist, The Washington Post, Foreign Policy–The Diplomat, and others. Łukasz Kulesa is a researcher at the Polish Institute of International Affairs (PISM) and senior associate at the European Leadership Network. Between 2014 and 2019, Kulesa worked as research director at the European Leadership Network (ELN). Previously, he worked as the head of the Non-Proliferation and Arms Control Project at the Polish Institute of International Affairs (PISM), and between 2010–2012 as deputy director of the Strategic Analyses Department at the National Security Bureau, a body providing aid and support to the President of the Republic of Poland in execut- ing security and defense tasks. His interests include nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction, Russian security policy, NATO, nuclear and conventional deterrence, the role of missile defense, and the future of arms control. Łukasz is a graduate of the law department of the Jagiellonian University (Cracow). He holds a master of arts degree in international relations and European studies from the Central European University (Budapest). EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE | 3 Emmanuelle Maitre has worked as a research fellow at the Foundation for Strategic Research (FRS) since July 2014. A graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris (Sciences Po), she works on issues of nuclear nonproliferation, deterrence, and disarmament. Before joining FRS and after working as a consultant in the private sector, Maitre worked as a research assistant at the Centre for Arms Control Studies (CESIM) and the Brookings Institution. Amelia Morgan is a research associate at the Center for Science and Security Stud- ies and a doctoral candidate in the Defence Studies Department at King’s College London, where her research is fully funded by the Defence Academy of the United Kingdom. She also teaches on a range of defense and security issues at the Joint Services Command and Staff College in Shrivenham. Morgan previously worked at the Policy Institute at King’s and as an intelligence analyst in the private sector. Michal Onderco is assistant professor of international relations in the Department of Public Administration and Sociology at Erasmus University Rotterdam. His current re- search concerns two main areas. First, he is interested in informal state cooperation in institutionalized settings in international politics, particularly in the area of nuclear nonproliferation. Second, he is interested in domestic sources of foreign and securi- ty policy in Europe. During the academic year 2018–2019, Dr. Onderco was a junior faculty fellow at Stanford University’s CISAC. Before coming to Erasmus University, he obtained his Ph.D. in political science from Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in 2014. In the academic year 2014–2015, he was a Max Weber fellow at the European Universi- ty Institute. Between 2012–2013, he was a Fulbright visiting researcher at Columbia University’s Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies. Anna Péczeli is a postdoctoral research fellow at the Center for Global Security Re- search at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. She is also an affiliate at CISAC at Stanford University, and an adjunct fellow
Recommended publications
  • People for Profit: North Korean Forced Labour on a Global Scale Edited by Remco E
    PEOPLE FOR PROFIT People for Profit North Korean Forced Labour on a Global Scale Edited by Remco E. Breuker & Imke B.L.H. van Gardingen Contributors Jan Blinka Britt C.H. Blom Marte C.H. Boonen Klara Boonstra Rosa Brandse Remco E. Breuker Imke B.L.H. van Gardingen Larissa van den Herik Tycho A. van der Hoog Marieke P. Meurs Cedric Ryngaert Shannon R. Stewart Anoma P. van der Veere This is an open source publication by LeidenAsiaCentre. Copyright © 2018 (authors). People for Profit: North Korean Forced Labour on a Global Scale Edited by Remco E. Breuker and Imke B.L.H. van Gardingen ISBN 978-90-826167-1-2 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-826167-3-6 (e-book) LeidenAsiaCentre is an independent research centre affiliated with Leiden University and made possible by a grant from the Vaes Elias Fund. The centre focuses on academic research with direct application to society. All research projects are conducted in close cooperation with a wide variety of partners from Dutch society. More information can be found on our website: www.leidenasiacentre.nl For contact or orders: [email protected] M. de Vrieshof 3, 2311 BZ Leiden, The Netherlands Book design: A.P. van der Veere Contents Contributors IX Acknowledgements XII Introduction Remco E. Breuker and Imke B.L.H. van Gardingen 1 Chapter I Setting the Background: Labour Conditions in the DPRK Remco E. Breuker 6 Chapter II Accountability for DPRK Workers in the Value Chain: The Case of Partner Shipyard, a Polish Shipbuilder and its Dutch Partners Imke B.L.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport D´Information
    N° 572 SÉNAT SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 2016-2017 Enregistré à la Présidence du Sénat le 6 juin 2017 RAPPORT D´INFORMATION FAIT au nom de la commission des affaires européennes (1) sur les relations entre l’ Union européenne et la Russie , Par MM. Yves POZZO di BORGO et Simon SUTOUR, Sénateurs (1) Cette commission est composée de : M. Jean Bizet, président ; MM. Michel Billout, Michel Delebarre, Jean-Paul Émorine, André Gattolin, Mme Fabienne Keller, MM Yves Pozzo di Borgo, André Reichardt, Jean-Claude Requier, Simon Sutour, Richard Yung, vice-présidents ; Mme Colette Mélot, M Louis Nègre, Mme Patricia Schillinger, secrétaires , MM. Pascal Allizard, Éric Bocquet, Philippe Bonnecarrère, Gérard César, René Danesi, Mme Nicole Duranton, M. Christophe-André Frassa, Mmes Joëlle Garriaud-Maylam, Pascale Gruny, M. Claude Haut, Mmes Sophie Joissains, Gisèle Jourda, MM. Claude Kern, Jean-Yves Leconte, François Marc, Didier Marie, Robert Navarro, Georges Patient, Michel Raison, Daniel Raoul, Alain Richard et Alain Vasselle. - 3 - S O M M A I R E Pages AVANT-PROPOS .................................................................................................................... 5 I. LA LENTE ÉROSION DU PARTENARIAT STRATÉGIQUE .......................................... 7 A. LA SUSPENSION DES CANAUX INSTITUTIONNELS DE DIALOGUE ........................ 7 B. LA CRISE UKRAINIENNE A RÉVÉLÉ DES MALENTENDUS ANCIENS ...................... 8 C. L’ÉLARGISSEMENT DE L’OTAN VU DE RUSSIE : DE L’ACCEPTATION INITIALE À LA CONTESTATION ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • First Steps to Transform Our Industry Signatories
    First Steps to Transform Our Industry Signatories ADIDAS • AIGLE • ALDO GROUP • AUCHAN RETAIL • BALLY • BESTSELLER • BONAVERI • BURBERRY • CALZEDONIA GROUP • CAPRI HOLDINGS LIMITED • CARREFOUR • CELIO • CHANEL • DAMARTEX GROUP • DCM JENNYFER • DECATHLON • DIESEL • EL CORTE INGLÉS • ERALDA • ERMENEGILDO ZEGNA • ETAM GROUP • EVERYBODY & EVERYONE • FARFETCH • FASHIONCUBE • FUNG GROUP • GANT • GAP INC. • GEOX • GRUPPO ARMANI • GROUPE BEAUMANOIR • GROUPE GALERIES LAFAYETTE • GROUPE ERAM • GROUPE IDKIDS • GROUPE ROSSIGNOL • H&M GROUP • HERMÈS • HERNO • HOUSE OF BAUKJEN • INDITEX • KARL LAGERFELD • KERING • KIABI • MANGO • MATCHESFASHION • MONCLER • MONOPRIX • NIKE, INC. • NOABRANDS • NORDSTROM • PAUL & JOE • PRADA S.P.A. • PROMOD • PUMA SE • PVH CORP. • RALPH LAUREN • RUYI • SALVATORE FERRAGAMO • SELFRIDGES GROUP • STELLA MCCARTNEY • TAPESTRY • TENDAM 4 Foreword 6 Executive Summary & Key Achievements 11 Background 15 Our Ambition 21 Pillar 1: Climate 33 Pillar 2: Biodiversity 42 Pillar 3: Oceans 51 Looking Ahead 54 Acknowledgements Foreword Over the past year, the trauma of the COVID-19 pandemic has been tempered by brilliant displays of altruism and collaboration. Businesses have embraced new responsibilities. Governments have taken extraordinary action to protect their citizens. Citizens have erupted in gratitude for workers who risked their lives for the greater good. But we have also seen the cost of a failure to cooperate. Our response to the pandemic has been hampered by lack of international collaboration. Multilateral organisations have faltered, and, in the absence of a globally coordinated response, nations have had to fend for themselves. Today, months after the first lockdowns, normality remains a distant aspiration. Contained within the challenge of the pandemic is a valuable lesson: global crises demand global solutions. This is true of COVID-19, of course, but it also applies to climate change, global inequality, and the destruction of the natural world.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Dimension Dutch EU Presidency
    Parliamentary dimension Dutch EU Presidency 1 January - 1 July 2016 Index parliamentary dimension dutch eu presidency Index Reflection During the first six months of 2016, it was the Netherlands' turn to assume the Presidency of Meeting of the 3 the Council of the European Union. Throughout this period the Dutch government was Chairpersons of COSAC responsible for efficiently guiding the Council negotiations. But the Dutch Presidency also had a 'parliamentary dimension' to it. This entailed that the Dutch House of Representatives and the Senate organised six conferences for fellow parliamentarians from EU member states. Stability, economic 5 coordination and governance The aim of these conferences was to encourage parliamentarians to work together towards a stronger parliamentary engagement in European decision-making. Particularly now that many important decisions are made at a European level, effective parliamentary scrutiny plays a Innovative & Inspiring 7 major role. And that is why it is essential that national parliaments and the European Parlia- ment join forces and work together. It was in this spirit that, during the six months of the Dutch Presidency, the House of Representatives and the Senate made it their goal to encourage cooperation between parliamentarians and so increase their joint effectiveness. Human trafficking in 8 the digital age This e-zine reflects on the parliamentary dimension of the Dutch EU Presidency and shows the highlights of the six interparliamentary conferences organised by the Dutch parliament on such themes as security and defence, economic and budgetary policy, energy and human trafficking. Energy, innovation and 11 circular economy It also features the special focuses that the Dutch parliament placed on the content and organisation of the meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • An Experiment to the Memory Enhancement and Attitudinal Effects of Political Posters
    THE Power of the poster An experiment to the memory enhancement and attitudinal effects of political posters By Thom Rietberg - 6151841 Master's Thesis - Graduate School of Communication Supervisor: Dr. Linda Bos June 2014 The power of the poster |Political Communication - 1 Abstract Even though marketing technologies evolve rapidly, political parties still use paper posters during elections. Elaborating on previous literature about political visuals, in this study a closer look will be taken at the effects of a poster. By separating three main cues; a photograph, a logo and a slogan, an attempt to a better understanding of these elements is developed. Both the single effect of the cue is analyzed as well as the interaction between cues. In an experimental study, respondents will be randomly assigned to one of the seven conditions. Each condition has its own political poster with an unique set of cues. Using knowledge and attitudinal questions the effects of memory enhancement and attitudes due to the cues are measured. Results show that having a photograph of the politician always improves the attitude, both toward the politician and the party. Adding a logo to the poster causes the memory enhancement of the political party to increase. All in all, the three cues differ in the effects they cause. It is up to the political party to decide what goal they want to achieve and to add the cues appropriate to the goal. These results could serve as a strategic media advice for political parties or function as a guideline for future research to the effects of visuals.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NETHERLANDS and Literature Survey
    Muslims in the EU: Cities Report Preliminary research report THE NETHERLANDS and literature survey 2007 Researchers: Froukje Demant (MA), Marcel Maussen (MA), Prof. Dr. Jan Rath Institute for Migration and Ethnic Studies (IMES) Open Society Institute Muslims in the EU - Cities Report EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program The Netherlands Table of contents Background............................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 6 Part I: Research and literature on Muslims .......................................................................... 9 1. Population ......................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 A note on the terminology and statistics ...................................................................... 9 1.2 Patterns of immigration.............................................................................................. 10 1.3 Citizenship.................................................................................................................. 13 2. Identity and religiosity................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Religosity.................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Radicalisation of Muslim young
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Arms Export Policy in 2018
    Dutch Arms Export Policy in 2018 Report by the Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation and the Minister of Foreign Affairs on the export of military goods July 2019 Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 3 2. Profile of the Dutch defence industry ....................................................... 4 3. Procedures and principles ....................................................................... 6 3.1 Procedures .............................................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Changes in 2018 ..................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Principles ................................................................................................................................ 7 4. Transparency in Dutch arms export policy ................................................ 8 4.1 Trade in military goods ........................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Trade in dual-use goods ......................................................................................................... 9 4.3 Procedures .............................................................................................................................. 9 5. Dutch arms export in 2018 .................................................................... 11 6. Relevant developments
    [Show full text]
  • Moosejaw Market Expansion Into France
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU Honors Projects Honors College Spring 5-17-2019 Moosejaw Market Expansion into France Rachel Renou [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, E-Commerce Commons, International Business Commons, and the Marketing Commons Repository Citation Renou, Rachel, "Moosejaw Market Expansion into France" (2019). Honors Projects. 439. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/439 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. 1 Moosejaw Market Expansion into France Rachel Renou Honors Project Submitted to the Honors College at Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with UNIVERSITY HONORS DATE Dr. Zhang Management Department; College of Business, Advisor Dr. Gremler Marketing Department; College of Business, Advisor 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………….....3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Background……………….…………………………………………………………………….....5 Country Analysis………………………………………………………………………...…….….8 Political Environment……………………………………………..………………..…..…8 Social/Cultural Environment………………………………………………………….....11 Industry/Business Analysis…………………………………………………………………..….16 Five Forces Analysis……………………………………………………………………….....….22 SWOT Analysis……………………………………………………………………………….....27
    [Show full text]
  • Rainbow Warrior Case
    1 Rainbow Warrior Case Rainbow Warrior (NEW ZEALAND v. FRANCE) France-New Zealand Arbitration Tribunal. 30 April 1990 (Jiménez de Aréchaga, Chairman; Sir Kenneth Keith and Professor Bredin, Members) SUMMARY: The facts: - In July 1985 a team of French agents sabotaged and sank the Rainbow Warrior, a vessel belonging to Greenpeace International, while it lay in harbour in New Zealand. One member of the crew was killed. Two of the agents, Major Mafart and Captain Prieur, were subsequently arrested in New Zealand and, having pleaded guilty to charges of manslaughter and criminal damage, were sentenced by a New Zealand court to ten years' imprisonment.1 A dispute arose between France, which demanded the release of the two agents, and New Zealand, which claimed compensation for the incident. New Zealand also complained that France was threatening to disrupt New Zealand trade with the European Communities unless the two agents were released. The two countries requested the Secretary-General of the United Nations to mediate and to propose a solution in the form of a ruling, which both Parties agreed in advance to accept. The Secretary-General's ruling, which was given in 1986, required France to pay US $7 million to New Zealand and to undertake not to take certain defined measures injurious to New Zealand trade with the European Communities.2 The ruling also provided that Major Mafart and Captain Prieur were to be released into French custody but were to spend the next three years on an isolated French military base in the Pacific. The two States concluded an agreement in the form of an exchange of letters on 9 July 1986 ("the First Agreement"),3 which provided for the implementation of the ruling.
    [Show full text]
  • Par Sophie Pierson, Legal Counsel, Ethics & Human Rights, TOTAL
    Par Sophie Pierson, Legal Counsel, Ethics & Human Rights, TOTAL & Stéphane Brabant, Avocat, Herbert Smith Freehills Paris LLP 27 AVRIL 2017 ©Direction des affaires publiques, juridiques et éthiques de l’Union des annonceurs 53 avenue Victor Hugo – 75116 Paris – Tél. : 01 45 00 79 10 – Fax : 01 45 00 55 79 http://www.uda.fr – e-mail : [email protected] SOMMAIRE Loi n°2017-399 du 27 mars 2017 relative au devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des entreprises donneuses d’ordre Décision n°2017-750 DC du 23 mars 2017 du Conseil constitutionnel Les principes directeurs — Principes directeurs des Nations Unies relatifs aux entreprises et aux droits de l’Homme — IBA Practical Guide on Business and Human Rights for Business Lawyers Exemple de document d’information — Document d’information de Total sur les droits de l’Homme (2016) Liste des documents utiles UDA – Direction des affaires publiques, juridiques et éthiques – Tous droits réservés – avril 2017 28 mars 2017 JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE Texte 1 sur 99 LOIS LOI no 2017-399 du 27 mars 2017 relative au devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des entreprises donneuses d’ordre (1) NOR : ECFX1509096L L’Assemblée nationale et le Sénat ont délibéré, L’Assemblée nationale a adopté, Vu la décision du Conseil constitutionnel no 2017-750 DC du 23 mars 2017 ; Le Président de la République promulgue la loi dont la teneur suit : Article 1er Après l’article L. 225-102-3 du code de commerce, il est inséré un article L. 225-102-4 ainsi rédigé : « Art. L.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaarverslag Lobby Twente 2020
    Jaarverslag lobby Twente 2020 ‘Zoomend’ samenwerken, verbinden en resultaten boeken Jaarverslag lobby Twente De afgelopen periode zijn verkiezingsprogramma’s geschreven en kandidatenlijsten opgesteld. Twente heeft Terugblik op een bewogen (lobby)jaar daar de nodige invloed op uitgeoefend, door samen met de provincies Gelderland en Overijssel en inliggende regio’s Den Haag op te roepen om ‘Nederland slim te benutten’. Verder zal de Twentse lobbyagenda in 2021 worden bepaald Het jaar 2020 begon zoals ieder ander jaar. De Nederlandse economie Dat moesten wij zelf ook uitvinden. Netwerkbijeenkomsten, door de 3O’s: onderwijs, overheid en ondernemers. draaide op volle toeren en dat was ook te merken op de arbeidsmarkt werkbezoeken en de Europese Week van Regio’s en Steden Gezamenlijk, passend bij het strategiedocument van de in Twente. Ook voor de lobby beloofde 2020 een interessant jaar te gingen fysiek niet door. Creativiteit en nieuwe ideeën en oplossingen Twente Board. worden vol kansen. Met de naderende Tweede Kamerverkiezingen en dienden zich aan wat resulteerde in mooie alternatieven online. de Europese Commissie op volledige snelheid, zou 2020 voor Twente Dit jaarverslag is daarmee het laatste jaarverslag in de hét jaar worden om nieuwe beleidsoplossingen vanuit Twente onder Twentse bedrijven en instellingen hebben door inzet van huidige vorm. Niet minder trots presenteren we in dit de aandacht te brengen op de Haagse en Europese agenda. ondernemerschap en innovatiekracht een grote bijdrage geleverd jaarverslag de prestaties die we in het afgelopen jaar aan de bestrijding van het coronavirus. Sinds de uitbraak hebben hebben geleverd. Niet geheel uitputtend, maar aan de En toen was daar corona.
    [Show full text]