Characterization of Agricultural Soils in CASCAPE Intervention Woredas in Western Oromia Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Characterization of Agricultural Soils in CASCAPE Intervention Woredas in Western Oromia Region Characterization of Agricultural Soils in CASCAPE Intervention Woredas in Western Oromia Region By Alemayehu Regassa (PhD) Final Report December, 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.1. Objective of the study .......................................................................................................... 9 1.2. Specific Objectives ................................................................................................................. 9 1.3. Scope of the study ................................................................................................................. 9 2. Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................... 10 2.1. The pre-fieldwork preparation phase ........................................................................... 11 2.2. The fieldwork phase ............................................................................................................ 12 2.3. Reconnaissance ..................................................................................................................... 12 2.4. Detailed profile description ............................................................................................... 12 2.5. Laboratory analysis ............................................................................................................. 13 2.6. Data Processing .................................................................................................................... 13 3. Results .......................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1. Description of the environmental settings of the studied woredas .............. 14 3.1.1. Omo Nada Woreda ................................................................................................... 14 3.1.2. Limu saka .................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.3. Gera Woreda .............................................................................................................. 15 3.1.4. Didessa Woreda ........................................................................................................ 17 3.1.5. Bedele zuria woreda ................................................................................................ 17 3.2. Results of Preparation and Review of Existing Information ............................. 18 3.3. Results of Field Work and Data processing ............................................................ 33 3.4. Soils of CASCAPE intervention Kebeles in Omo Nada Woreda ....................... 33 3.4.1. Geomorphology and Geology .............................................................................. 33 3.4.2. The soil- landscape .................................................................................................. 40 3.4.3. Soil profile descriptions with analytical data ................................................. 44 3.4.4. Synthesis ..................................................................................................................... 58 3.5. Soils of CASCAPE intervention Kebeles in Limu Saka woreda ........................ 61 3.5.1. Geomorphology and Geology .............................................................................. 61 3.5.2. The soil- landscape .................................................................................................. 65 3.5.3. Soil profile descriptions with analytical data ................................................. 69 2 3.5.4. Synthesis ..................................................................................................................... 79 3.6. Soils of CASCAPE intervention Kebeles in Gera woreda ................................... 81 3.6.1. Geology and geomorphology ............................................................................... 81 3.6.2. The soil- landscape .................................................................................................. 84 3.6.3. Synthesis ................................................................................................................... 100 3.7. Soils of CASCAPE intervention Kebeles in Didessa woreda ........................... 102 3.7.1. Geology and geomorphology ............................................................................. 102 3.7.2. The soil- landscape ................................................................................................ 105 3.7.3. Synthesis ................................................................................................................... 117 3.8. Soils of CASCAPE intervention Kebeles in Bedele Zuria woreda .................. 119 3.8.1. Geology and Geomorphology ............................................................................ 119 3.8.2. The soil- landscape ................................................................................................ 121 3.8.3. Synthesis ................................................................................................................... 136 4. Conclusion and recommendation ..................................................................................... 138 5. References ................................................................................................................................ 140 6. Annex .......................................................................................................................................... 143 Annex 1. Auger Observation points of CASCAPE intervention woredas in West Oromia region .................................................................................................................................. 143 Annex 2. Studied soil profiles in CASCAPE intervention Woredas of West Oromia region .................................................................................................................................................. 148 Annex 3. Slope map of the CASCAPE intervention woredas in West Oromia region .............................................................................................................................................................. 149 Annex 4. Elevation map of the CASCAPE intervention woredas in West Oromia region .................................................................................................................................................. 153 3 List of Tables Table 1. Total area and percentage coverage of different landforms for kebeles in CASCAPE intervention woredas ...................................................................... 20 Table 2: Slope classes in CASCAPE intervention woredas of west oromia region ... 26 Table 3: Slope classes of Kebeles in CASCAPE intervention woredas ................... 27 Table 4. Area and percent coverage of lithology in CASCAPE intervention kebeles in Omo Nada woreda ....................................................................................... 38 Table 5: Summary of major Soil types and their distribution in the four CASCAPE intervention kebeles of Omo Nada woreda....................................................... 42 Table 6. Site and profile description and lab analytical data of CASCAPE intervention kebeles in Omo Nada woreda ....................................................... 44 6.1. Site and profile description of Doyo Yaya Kebele ....................................... 44 Table 6.2: Physical properties of soil profile in Doyo Yaya ................................. 47 Table 6.3: Selected chemical properties of soil profiles in Doyo Yaya Kebele ........ 48 Table 6.4. Exchangeable cations and CEC results of soil profiles in Doyo yaya kebele ................................................................................................................. 48 Table 6.5 : Site and profile description of soil profiles in nada Bidaru kebele ........ 49 Table 6.6: Physical properties of soil profiles in Nada Bidaru Kebele .................. 51 Table 6.7: Selected chemical properties of soil profiles in Nada Bidaru ................ 51 Table 6.8: Exchangeable cations and CEC results of soil profiles in Nada Bidaru kebele ........................................................................................................ 52 Table 6.9: Site and profile description of Nada Chala Kebele in Omo Nada Woreda ................................................................................................................. 52 Tabler 6.10: Physical properties of soil profiles in Nada Chala Kebele ................. 54 Table 6.11: Selected chemical properties of soil profiles in Nada Chala kebele ..... 55 Table 6.12: Exchangeable cations and CEC results of soil profiles in Nada Chala kebele ........................................................................................................ 55 Table 6.13: Site and profile description of Toli Beyem Kebele in Omo Nada Woreda ................................................................................................................. 56 Table 6.14: Physical properties of soil profiles in Toli Beyem Kebele .................. 57 Table 6.15: Selected chemical properties of soil profiles in Toli Beyem kebele ..... 57 1 Table 6.16: Exchangeable cations and CEC results of soil profiles
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Midterm Survey Protocol
    Protocol for L10K Midterm Survey The Last 10 Kilometers Project JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia October 2010 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 The Last Ten Kilometers Project ............................................................................................................ 3 Objective one activities cover all the L10K woredas: .......................................................................... 4 Activities for objectives two, three and four in selected woredas ...................................................... 5 The purpose of the midterm survey ....................................................................................................... 6 The midterm survey design ...................................................................................................................... 7 Annex 1: List of L10K woredas by region, implementation strategy, and implementing phase ......... 10 Annex 2: Maps.................................................................................................................................................. 11 Annex 3: Research questions with their corresponding study design ...................................................... 14 Annex 4: Baseline survey methodology ........................................................................................................ 15 Annex 5: L10K midterm survey
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Survey of Limmu Genet Town from Its Foundation up to Present
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 6, ISSUE 07, JULY 2017 ISSN 2277-8616 Historical Survey Of Limmu Genet Town From Its Foundation Up To Present Dagm Alemayehu Tegegn Abstract: The process of modern urbanization in Ethiopia began to take shape since the later part of the nineteenth century. The territorial expansion of emperor Menelik (r. 1889 –1913), political stability and effective centralization and bureaucratization of government brought relative acceleration of the pace of urbanization in Ethiopia; the improvement of the system of transportation and communication are identified as factors that contributed to this new phase of urban development. Central government expansion to the south led to the appearance of garrison centers which gradually developed to small- sized urban center or Katama. The garrison were established either on already existing settlements or on fresh sites and also physically they were situated on hill tops. Consequently, Limmu Genet town was founded on the former Limmu Ennarya state‘s territory as a result of the territorial expansion of the central government and system of administration. Although the history of the town and its people trace many year back to the present, no historical study has been conducted on. Therefore the aim of this study is to explore the history of Limmu Genet town from its foundation up to present. Keywords: Limmu Ennary, Limmu Genet, Urbanization, Development ———————————————————— 1. Historical Background of the Study Area its production. The production and marketing of forest coffee spread the fame and prestige of Limmu Enarya ( The early history of Limmu Oromo Mohammeed Hassen, 1994). The name Limmu Ennarya is The history of Limmu Genet can be traced back to the rise derived from a combination of the name of the medieval of the Limmu Oromo clans, which became kingdoms or state of Ennarya and the Oromo clan name who settled in states along the Gibe river basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution of Glossina Sp. and Trypanosoma Sp. in South-Western
    Duguma et al. Parasites & Vectors (2015) 8:430 DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-1041-9 RESEARCH Open Access Spatial distribution of Glossina sp. and Trypanosoma sp. in south-western Ethiopia Reta Duguma1,2, Senbeta Tasew3, Abebe Olani4, Delesa Damena4, Dereje Alemu3, Tesfaye Mulatu4, Yoseph Alemayehu5, Moti Yohannes6, Merga Bekana1, Antje Hoppenheit7, Emmanuel Abatih8, Tibebu Habtewold2, Vincent Delespaux8* and Luc Duchateau2 Abstract Background: Accurate information on the distribution of the tsetse fly is of paramount importance to better control animal trypanosomosis. Entomological and parasitological surveys were conducted in the tsetse belt of south-western Ethiopia to describe the prevalence of trypanosomosis (PoT), the abundance of tsetse flies (AT) and to evaluate the association with potential risk factors. Methods: The study was conducted between 2009 and 2012. The parasitological survey data were analysed by a random effects logistic regression model, whereas the entomological survey data were analysed by a Poisson regression model. The percentage of animals with trypanosomosis was regressed on the tsetse fly count using a random effects logistic regression model. Results: The following six risk factors were evaluated for PoT (i) altitude: significant and inverse correlation with trypanosomosis, (ii) annual variation of PoT: no significant difference between years, (iii) regional state: compared to Benishangul-Gumuz (18.0 %), the three remaining regional states showed significantly lower PoT, (iv) river system: the PoT differed significantly between the river systems, (iv) sex: male animals (11.0 %) were more affected than females (9.0 %), and finally (vi) age at sampling: no difference between the considered classes. Observed trypanosome species were T. congolense (76.0 %), T.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 and Reassessment of Crop
    Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 And Reassessment Of Crop Production and Marketing For 2014/15 October 2015 Final Report Ethiopia: Bellmon Analysis - 2014/15 i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................ iii Table of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Economic Background ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Poverty ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 Wage Labor ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 Agriculture Sector Overview ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pulses in Ethiopia, Their Taxonomy and Agricultural Significance E.Westphal
    Pulses in Ethiopia, their taxonomy andagricultura l significance E.Westphal JN08201,579 E.Westpha l Pulses in Ethiopia, their taxonomy and agricultural significance Proefschrift terverkrijgin g van degraa dva n doctori nd elandbouwwetenschappen , opgeza gva n derecto r magnificus, prof.dr .ir .H .A . Leniger, hoogleraar ind etechnologie , inne t openbaar teverdedige n opvrijda g 15 maart 1974 desnamiddag st evie ruu r ind eaul ava nd eLandbouwhogeschoo lt eWageninge n Centrefor AgriculturalPublishing and Documentation Wageningen- 8February 1974 46° 48° TOWNS AND VILLAGES DEBRE BIRHAN 56 MAJI DEBRE SINA 57 BUTAJIRA KARA KORE 58 HOSAINA KOMBOLCHA 59 DE8RE ZEIT (BISHUFTU) BATI 60 MOJO TENDAHO 61 MAKI SERDO 62 ADAMI TULU 8 ASSAB 63 SHASHAMANE 9 WOLDYA 64 SODDO 10 KOBO 66 BULKI 11 ALAMATA 66 BAKO 12 LALIBELA 67 GIDOLE 13 SOKOTA 68 GIARSO 14 MAICHEW 69 YABELO 15 ENDA MEDHANE ALEM 70 BURJI 16 ABIYAOI 71 AGERE MARIAM 17 AXUM 72 FISHA GENET 16 ADUA 73 YIRGA CHAFFE 19 ADIGRAT 74 DILA 20 SENAFE 75 WONDO 21 ADI KAYEH 76 YIRGA ALEM 22 ADI UGRI 77 AGERE SELAM 23 DEKEMHARE 78 KEBRE MENGIST (ADOLA) 24 MASSAWA 79 NEGELLI 25 KEREN 80 MEGA 26 AGOROAT 81 MOYALE 27 BARENIU 82 DOLO 28 TESENEY 83 EL KERE 29 OM HAJER 84 GINIR 30 DEBAREK 85 ADABA 31 METEMA 86 DODOLA 32 GORGORA 87 BEKOJI 33 ADDIS ZEMEN 88 TICHO 34 DEBRE TABOR 89 NAZRET (ADAMA 35 BAHAR DAR 90 METAHARA 36 DANGLA 91 AWASH 37 INJIBARA 92 MIESO 38 GUBA 93 ASBE TEFERI 39 BURE 94 BEDESSA 40 DEMBECHA 95 GELEMSO 41 FICHE 96 HIRNA 42 AGERE HIWET (AMB3) 97 KOBBO 43 BAKO (SHOA) 98 DIRE DAWA 44 GIMBI 99 ALEMAYA
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritization of Shelter/NFI Needs
    Prioritization of Shelter/NFI needs Date: 31st May 2018 Shelter and NFI Needs As of 18 May 2018, the overall number of displaced people is 345,000 households. This figure is based on DTM round 10, partner’s assessments, government requests, as well as the total of HH supported since July 2017. The S/NFI updated its prioritisation in early May and SNFI Cluster partners agreed on several criteria to guide prioritisation which include: - 1) type of emergency, 2) duration of displacement, and 3) sub-standard shelter conditions including IDPS hosted in collective centres and open-air sites and 4) % of vulnerable HH at IDP sites. Thresholds for the criteria were also agreed and in the subsequent analysis the cluster identified 193 IDP hosting woredas mostly in Oromia and Somali regions, as well as Tigray, Gambella and Addis Ababa municipality. A total of 261,830 HH are in need of urgent shelter and NFI assistance. At present the Cluster has a total of 57,000 kits in stocks and pipeline. The Cluster requires urgent funding to address the needs of 204,830 HHs that are living in desperate displacement conditions across the country. This caseload is predicted to increase as the flooding continues in the coming months. Shelter and NFI Priority Activities In terms of priority activities, the SNFI Cluster is in need of ES/NFI support for 140,259 HH displaced mainly due to flood and conflict under Pillar 2, primarily in Oromia and Somali Regions. In addition, the Shelter and NFI Cluster requires immediate funding for recovery activities to support 14,000 HH (8,000 rebuild and 6,000 repair) with transitional shelter support and shelter repair activities under Pillar 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Spatial Distribution of Tsetse Fly and Prevalence Of
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Journal of Pharmacy and Alternative Medicine www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-4807 (online) ISSN 2222-5668 (Paper) An International Peer-reviewed Journal Vol.7, 2015 Study on Spatial Distribution of Tsetse Fly and Prevalence of Bovine Trypanosomosis and other Risk Factors: Case Study in Darimu District, Ilu Aba Bora Zone, Western Ethiopia Fedesa Habte Assefa Kebede Tekalegn Desta School of Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box: 307 Jimma, Ethiopia Abstract African Animal Trypanosomosis is one of the major impediments to livestock development and agricultural production in Ethiopia, which negatively affect the overall development in agriculture in general, and to food self- reliance efforts in particular. Currently, about 180,000 to 200,000km 2 of fertile arable land of west and southwest of the country is underutilized. Darimu district is one of the areas with such problems. Therefore, a cross-sectional study was conducted with the objectives of assessing the prevalence of Bovine Trypanosomosis and determines spatial distribution and apparent density of tsetse and other biting flies in the study area. In current study, a total of 650 blood samples were collected from randomly selected animals and subjected to Buffy coat parasitological laboratory technique and positive samples were subjected to thin blood smear followed by Giemsa staining. Out of the total blood sampled, 7.1% tested positive for trypanosomosis. Out of positive cases, Trypanosoma congolense (82.61%) was the dominant trypanosome species followed by mixed infection ( Trypanosoma congolense and Trypanosoma vivax ) (8.67%).
    [Show full text]
  • Developing the Butter Value Chain in Ethiopia
    LIVES WORKING PAPER 1 PAPER WORKING LIVES Developing the butter value chain in Ethiopia ISBN 92–9146–366–3 Livestock and irrigation value chains for Ethiopian smallholders project aims to improve the competitiveness, sustainability and equity of value chains for selected high‐value livestock and irrigated crop commodities in target areas of four regions of Ethiopia. It identifies, targets and promotes improved technologies and innovations to develop high value livestock and irrigated crop value chains; it improves the capacities of Livestock and Irrigation Value chains for Ethiopian Smallholders value chain actors; it improves the use of knowledge at different levels; it generates knowledge through action‐oriented research; and it promotes and disseminates good practices. Project carried out with the financial support of the Government of Canada provided through Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD). lives-ethiopia.org The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) works to improve food security and reduce poverty in developing countries through research for better and more sustainable use of livestock. ILRI is a member of the CGIAR Consortium, a global research partnership of 15 centres working with many partners for a food-secure future. ILRI has two main campuses in East Africa and other hubs in East, West and southern Africa and South, Southeast and East Asia. ilri.org The International Water Management Institute (IWMI) is a non-profit, scientific research organization focusing on the sustainable use of water and land resources in developing countries. It is headquartered in Colombo, Sri Lanka, with regional offices across Asia and Africa. IWMI works in partnership with governments, civil society and the private sector to develop scalable agricultural water management solutions that have a real impact on poverty reduction, food security and ecosystem health.
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater in Ethiopia
    Springer Hydrogeology Groundwater in Ethiopia Features, Numbers and Opportunities Bearbeitet von Seifu Kebede 1. Auflage 2012. Buch. xiv, 283 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 642 30390 6 Format (B x L): 15,5 x 23,5 cm Gewicht: 613 g Weitere Fachgebiete > Geologie, Geographie, Klima, Umwelt > Geologie > Hydrologie, Hydrogeologie Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. Chapter 2 Groundwater Occurrence in Regions and Basins 2.1 The Broad (Oligo-Miocene) Volcanic Plateau and Associated Shields Geology and Stratigraphy The broad volcanic plateau (Fig. 1.2) accounts for about 25 % of Ethiopian land- mass. The Ethiopian volcanic plateau is a thick monotonous, rapidly erupted pile of locally deformed, flat lying basalts consisting of a number of volcanic centers with different magmatic character and with a large range of ages. The trap volcanics including the associated shield volcanoes cover an area at least 6 9 105 km2 (around two-third surface of the country), and a total volume estimated to be at least 3.5 9 105 km3 (Mohr 1983) and probably higher than 1.2 9 106 km3 according to Rochette et al. (1998). Flat-topped hills and nearly horizontal lava flows is a common scene in the broad volcanic plateau. Topographic features of the basaltic plateau are vertical cliffs, waterfalls, V-shaped valleys, vertical and mushroom-like outcrops of columnar basalts, and step-like hill terraces.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
    CESI A4511403 Report STA Territorial and Environmental Studies Approved Page 2 of 135 Client SALINI Costruttori S.p.A. Subject Gilgel Gibe II hydroelectric project Environmental Impact Assessment Main Report Order 0512/81/0001 E del 29/03/2004 Notes this document shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of CESI. N. of pages 135 N. of pages annexed 16 Issue date September 2004, 15th Prepared Daniela Colombo (STA) Stefano Maran (STA) Verified Giuseppe Paolo Stigliano (STA) Approved Antonio Nicola Negri (STA) CESI Via R. Rubattino 54 Capitale sociale 8 550 000 Euro Registro Imprese di Milano Centro Elettrotecnico 20134 Milano - Italia interamente versato Sezione Ordinaria Sperimentale Italiano Telefono +39 022125.1 Codice fiscale e numero N. R.E.A. 429222 Giacinto Motta SpA Fax +39 0221255440 iscrizione CCIAA 00793580150 P.I. IT00793580150 www.cesi.it CESI A4511403 Report STA Territorial and Environmental Studies Approved Page 3 of 135 Table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................... 9 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 19 1.1 Purpose 19 1.2 Background.............................................................................................................................19 1.3 Impact assessment responsibility and Assessment Team.......................................................21 1.4 Revision – September 2004....................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]