DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrating Food Security and Biodiversity Governance a Multi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrating Food Security and Biodiversity Governance a Multi See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326632264 Integrating food security and biodiversity governance: A multi-level social network analysis in Ethiopia Article in Land Use Policy · July 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.014 CITATION READS 1 133 4 authors: Tolera Senbeto Jiren Arvid Bergsten Leuphana University Lüneburg Leuphana University Lüneburg 5 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS 15 PUBLICATIONS 122 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Julia Leventon Joern Fischer Leuphana University Lüneburg Leuphana University Lüneburg 38 PUBLICATIONS 483 CITATIONS 220 PUBLICATIONS 13,108 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Wood-pastures of Transylvania (Romania). View project Is informal labor sharing among smallholders influencing their food security and crop-choice sovereignty? View project All content following this page was uploaded by Tolera Senbeto Jiren on 09 August 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Land Use Policy 78 (2018) 420–429 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Land Use Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/landusepol Integrating food security and biodiversity governance: A multi-level social network analysis in Ethiopia T ⁎ Tolera Senbeto Jiren , Arvid Bergsten, Ine Dorresteijn, Neil French Collier, Julia Leventon, Joern Fischer Leuphana University, Faculty of Sustainability, Scharnhorststrasse 1, D21335 Luneburg, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Integrating food security and biodiversity conservation is an important contemporary challenge. Traditionally, Biodiversity food security and biodiversity conservation have been considered as separate or even incompatible policy goals. Food security However, there is growing recognition of their interdependence, as well as of the need to coordinate solutions Governance across multiple policy sectors and levels of governance. Despite such recognition, there has been no empirical Harmonization analysis of governance networks that specifically integrates food security and biodiversity. Focusing on south- Integration western Ethiopia, this paper used social network analysis to investigate three main questions: how stakeholders Multi-level governance Social network analysis interact in the governance of food security and biodiversity in a multi-level governance context; how the goals of Stakeholders food security and biodiversity are integrated in such a multi-level governance context; and which stakeholders Stakeholder analysis are popular and play connecting roles between stakeholders in the governance network. The study was con- Collaborative governance ducted in a subsistence dominated farming landscape, where we interviewed 244 stakeholders ranging from local to national levels. We found that the governance of food security and biodiversity conservation was strongly hierarchical, with virtually no horizontal linkages between adjacent districts, and very few vertical direct interactions of stakeholders spanning two or more levels of governance. Introducing a novel analytical distinction of collaborative vs individual integration, we found that only a minority of the collaborations be- tween stakeholders took both food security and biodiversity into account, despite the majority of actors being individually involved in both sectors. Stakeholders with positional power, sociological power (popularity) and formal authority played a liaison role in the governance network. To further improve integration of food security and biodiversity conservation, a governance network that harnesses stakeholder collaboration across sectors and governance levels is essential. However, given the central role of many government administrative organiza- tions, possible problems of power capture by some stakeholders need to be carefully managed. 1. Introduction UNEP, 2013). Historically, food security and biodiversity conservation have been Ensuring universal food security and halting biodiversity decline are governed separately (Sunderland, 2011; Chitakira et al., 2012). More two of the biggest contemporary global governance challenges. Food recently, with the introduction of the Sustainable Development Goals security exists when all people have access to sufficient, safe, nutritious (SDGs), there has been increased recognition that the integration of and preferred food, such that they can lead a healthy and productive food security and biodiversity conservation is necessary to ensure sus- life (FAO, 2014). Biodiversity refers to the variability among living tainable outcomes in both (Brussaard et al., 2010; Chappell and organisms including diversity in genes, species, and ecosystems LaValle, 2011; Mark et al., 2017). With the aim of managing trade-offs (Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992). Agricultural production – and ensuring a synergistic outcome, programs around the im- one aspect of food security – poses a threat to biodiversity through plementation of the SDGs seek to integrate social, economic and en- agricultural area expansion (Balmford et al., 2005; Smith, 2013), and vironmental aspects. One way to harmoniously achieve these goals is to agricultural intensification (Pimentel et al., 2005). Loss of biodiversity, foster a governance network that enhances integration of multiple in turn, may have negative short-term and long-term effects on agri- sectors and stakeholders across different governance levels (Mark et al., cultural production and thus also on food security (Sunderland, 2011; 2017), as well as a coordinated policy process and coherent policy goals ⁎ Corresponding author: Leuphana University, Faculty of Sustainability, Scharnhorststrasse 1, Room 229, Zentralgebaeude, Luneburg, D21335, Germany. E-mail address: [email protected] (T.S. Jiren). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.014 Received 6 June 2017; Received in revised form 9 July 2018; Accepted 9 July 2018 0264-8377/ © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. T.S. Jiren et al. Land Use Policy 78 (2018) 420–429 (Tosun and Leininger, 2017). Here, a key goal is to minimize possible collaborate purely to pursue their own interests (Koontz and Thomas, trade-offs between food production and conservation, and maximize 2006; Cumming, 2016). Furthermore, we must remain critical of where synergies through appropriate governance (Carlsson and Sandström, in a governance network collaboration occurs; it is possible that the 2007; Tscharntke et al., 2012). stakeholders that are tasked with bringing together diverse interests Governance comprises both the structures (actors and their lin- may not have the capacities or powers to do so effectively (Leventon kages) and processes (rule making and enforcement process) influen- and Antypas, 2012). Thus, to assess the effectiveness of a governance cing food security and biodiversity conservation outcomes (Hill, 2013; network one must investigate the characteristics of stakeholders, the Mertens et al., 2015). Governance structures reflect how different sta- position and interest of individual stakeholders in the collaborative keholders are arranged or the structural pattern of relation between network, and the nature of collaboration between the stakeholders stakeholders to bring about certain outcomes (Bodin and Crona, 2009). (Bodin and Norberg, 2007; Cumming, 2016; Bodin, 2017). One suitable In social-ecological systems governance, structure could range from a method to study the different types of collaborative governance net- strictly hierarchical – a top-down or a bottom-up governance structure – work – including in the integration of food security and biodiversity to a governance network – that is, a structure that supports stakeholder conservation – is social network analysis (Bodin and Crona, 2009). interaction across multiple geographical jurisdictions, policy sectors Governance of multiple policy domains can be integrated in various and governance levels (Cumming, 2016). ways. To distinguish how different integration processes may relate to The focus of this paper is on the governance network influencing the governance network, we introduce a new conceptual distinction of food security and biodiversity conservation, that is, on the interactions ‘collaborative’ versus ‘individual’ governance integration, which we between agencies and other stakeholders from various districts and analyze using network analysis. We define individual integration as governance levels through which decisions are made and actions are when a stakeholder collaborates on food security with one partner, and taken that affect food security, biodiversity or both (Alexander Steven on biodiversity with another partner. Collaborative integration, on the et al., 2016). A stakeholder, in this context, is any actor who affects or is other hand, occurs when two stakeholders integrate both policy goals in affected by a decision, including government agencies, community a single collaboration. The individual integration approach may help an groups, and non-governmental organizations with diverse interests, individual stakeholder to harmonize the two policy goals in its in- positions and power (Freeman, 1978; Lemos and Agrawal, 2006). Un- dividual governance activities, for example by learning from different derstanding the pattern of interactions among stakeholders is crucial for collaborations. However, the individual approach to integration cannot governance in any context, but especially when there are multiple ob- guarantee that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Survey of Limmu Genet Town from Its Foundation up to Present
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 6, ISSUE 07, JULY 2017 ISSN 2277-8616 Historical Survey Of Limmu Genet Town From Its Foundation Up To Present Dagm Alemayehu Tegegn Abstract: The process of modern urbanization in Ethiopia began to take shape since the later part of the nineteenth century. The territorial expansion of emperor Menelik (r. 1889 –1913), political stability and effective centralization and bureaucratization of government brought relative acceleration of the pace of urbanization in Ethiopia; the improvement of the system of transportation and communication are identified as factors that contributed to this new phase of urban development. Central government expansion to the south led to the appearance of garrison centers which gradually developed to small- sized urban center or Katama. The garrison were established either on already existing settlements or on fresh sites and also physically they were situated on hill tops. Consequently, Limmu Genet town was founded on the former Limmu Ennarya state‘s territory as a result of the territorial expansion of the central government and system of administration. Although the history of the town and its people trace many year back to the present, no historical study has been conducted on. Therefore the aim of this study is to explore the history of Limmu Genet town from its foundation up to present. Keywords: Limmu Ennary, Limmu Genet, Urbanization, Development ———————————————————— 1. Historical Background of the Study Area its production. The production and marketing of forest coffee spread the fame and prestige of Limmu Enarya ( The early history of Limmu Oromo Mohammeed Hassen, 1994). The name Limmu Ennarya is The history of Limmu Genet can be traced back to the rise derived from a combination of the name of the medieval of the Limmu Oromo clans, which became kingdoms or state of Ennarya and the Oromo clan name who settled in states along the Gibe river basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 and Reassessment of Crop
    Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 And Reassessment Of Crop Production and Marketing For 2014/15 October 2015 Final Report Ethiopia: Bellmon Analysis - 2014/15 i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................ iii Table of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Economic Background ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Poverty ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 Wage Labor ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 Agriculture Sector Overview ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia a M Tigray a Afar M H U Amhara a Uz N M
    35°0'0"E 40°0'0"E Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia A m Tigray A Afar m h u Amhara a uz N m Dera u N u u G " / m r B u l t Dire Dawa " r a e 0 g G n Hareri 0 ' r u u Addis Ababa ' n i H a 0 Gambela m s Somali 0 ° b a K Oromia Ü a I ° o A Hidabu 0 u Wara o r a n SNNPR 0 h a b s o a 1 u r Abote r z 1 d Jarte a Jarso a b s a b i m J i i L i b K Jardega e r L S u G i g n o G A a e m e r b r a u / K e t m uyu D b e n i u l u o Abay B M G i Ginde e a r n L e o e D l o Chomen e M K Beret a a Abe r s Chinaksen B H e t h Yaya Abichuna Gne'a r a c Nejo Dongoro t u Kombolcha a o Gulele R W Gudetu Kondole b Jimma Genete ru J u Adda a a Boji Dirmeji a d o Jida Goro Gutu i Jarso t Gu J o Kembibit b a g B d e Berga l Kersa Bila Seyo e i l t S d D e a i l u u r b Gursum G i e M Haro Maya B b u B o Boji Chekorsa a l d Lalo Asabi g Jimma Rare Mida M Aleltu a D G e e i o u e u Kurfa Chele t r i r Mieso m s Kegn r Gobu Seyo Ifata A f o F a S Ayira Guliso e Tulo b u S e G j a e i S n Gawo Kebe h i a r a Bako F o d G a l e i r y E l i Ambo i Chiro Zuria r Wayu e e e i l d Gaji Tibe d lm a a s Diga e Toke n Jimma Horo Zuria s e Dale Wabera n a w Tuka B Haru h e N Gimbichu t Kutaye e Yubdo W B Chwaka C a Goba Koricha a Leka a Gidami Boneya Boshe D M A Dale Sadi l Gemechis J I e Sayo Nole Dulecha lu k Nole Kaba i Tikur Alem o l D Lalo Kile Wama Hagalo o b r Yama Logi Welel Akaki a a a Enchini i Dawo ' b Meko n Gena e U Anchar a Midega Tola h a G Dabo a t t M Babile o Jimma Nunu c W e H l d m i K S i s a Kersana o f Hana Arjo D n Becho A o t
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Social Accountability in Service Providing Public Sectors: Exploring Beneficiaries' Perspectiv Es in Jimma Z
    Research, Society and Development ISSN: 2525-3409 ISSN: 2525-3409 [email protected] Universidade Federal de Itajubá Brasil Factors Affecting Social Accountability in Service Providing Public Sectors: Exploring Beneficiaries’ Perspectiv es in Jimma Zone Doja, Hunde; Duressa, Tadele Factors Affecting Social Accountability in Service Providing Public Sectors: Exploring Beneficiaries’ Perspectiv es in Jimma Zone Research, Society and Development, vol. 8, no. 12, 2019 Universidade Federal de Itajubá, Brasil Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=560662203013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v8i12.1571 This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Factors Affecting Social Accountability in Service Providing Public Sectors: Exploring Beneficiaries’ Perspectiv es in Jimma Zone Fatores que afetam a responsabilidade social nos setores prestadores de serviços: explorando as perspectivas dos beneficiários na zona de Jimma Factores que afectan la responsabilidad social en la prestación de servicios a sectores públicos: exploración de las perspectivas de los beneficiarios en la zona de Jimma Hunde Doja [email protected] Jimma University, Etiopía hp://orcid.org/0000-0002-1559-6252 Tadele Duressa [email protected] Jimma University, Etiopía Research, Society and Development, vol. 8, no. 12, 2019 hp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8663-1027 Universidade Federal de Itajubá, Brasil Received: 29 August 2019 Revised: 31 August 2019 Accepted: 25 September 2019 Abstract: is study was undertaken to identify the factors affecting social Published: 27 September 2019 accountability in service providing public sector organizations from beneficiary DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd- perspectives in Jimma Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Administrative Map (August 2017)
    Ethiopia: Administrative map (August 2017) ERITREA National capital P Erob Tahtay Adiyabo Regional capital Gulomekeda Laelay Adiyabo Mereb Leke Ahferom Red Sea Humera Adigrat ! ! Dalul ! Adwa Ganta Afeshum Aksum Saesie Tsaedaemba Shire Indasilase ! Zonal Capital ! North West TigrayTahtay KoraroTahtay Maychew Eastern Tigray Kafta Humera Laelay Maychew Werei Leke TIGRAY Asgede Tsimbila Central Tigray Hawzen Medebay Zana Koneba Naeder Adet Berahile Region boundary Atsbi Wenberta Western Tigray Kelete Awelallo Welkait Kola Temben Tselemti Degua Temben Mekele Zone boundary Tanqua Abergele P Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Tsegede Tselemt Mekele Town Special Enderta Afdera Addi Arekay South East Ab Ala Tsegede Mirab Armacho Beyeda Woreda boundary Debark Erebti SUDAN Hintalo Wejirat Saharti Samre Tach Armacho Abergele Sanja ! Dabat Janamora Megale Bidu Alaje Sahla Addis Ababa Ziquala Maychew ! Wegera Metema Lay Armacho Wag Himra Endamehoni Raya Azebo North Gondar Gonder ! Sekota Teru Afar Chilga Southern Tigray Gonder City Adm. Yalo East Belesa Ofla West Belesa Kurri Dehana Dembia Gonder Zuria Alamata Gaz Gibla Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu ) Elidar Amhara Gelegu Quara ! Takusa Ebenat Gulina Bugna Awra Libo Kemkem Kobo Gidan Lasta Benishangul Gumuz North Wello AFAR Alfa Zone 1(Awsi Rasu) Debre Tabor Ewa ! Fogera Farta Lay Gayint Semera Meket Guba Lafto DPubti DJIBOUTI Jawi South Gondar Dire Dawa Semen Achefer East Esite Chifra Bahir Dar Wadla Delanta Habru Asayita P Tach Gayint ! Bahir Dar City Adm. Aysaita Guba AMHARA Dera Ambasel Debub Achefer Bahirdar Zuria Dawunt Worebabu Gambela Dangura West Esite Gulf of Aden Mecha Adaa'r Mile Pawe Special Simada Thehulederie Kutaber Dangila Yilmana Densa Afambo Mekdela Tenta Awi Dessie Bati Hulet Ej Enese ! Hareri Sayint Dessie City Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Project for Supporting Sustainable Forest Management Through REDD+ and Certified Forest Coffee Production and Promotion
    Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Oromia Environment Forest and Climate Change Authority (OEFCCA) Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise (OFWE) Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Project for Supporting Sustainable Forest Management through REDD+ and Certified Forest Coffee Production and Promotion Project Completion Report November 2020 Japan International Cooperation Agency Japan International Forest Promotion and Cooperation Center Appropriate Agriculture International Co., LTD GE JR 20-076 Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Project for Supporting Sustainable Forest Management through REDD+ and Certified Forest Coffee Production and Promotion Project Completion Report Table of Contents Map List of Abbreviation Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 Outline of the Project .................................................................................... 7 1-1 Background of the Project .................................................................................... 7 1-2 Objectives of the Project ...................................................................................... 8 1-3 Target of the Project ............................................................................................ 8 1-4 Implementation Agency ....................................................................................... 8 1-5 Input for the Project ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopian Coffee Buying Guide
    Fintrac Inc. www.fintrac.com [email protected] US Virgin Islands 3077 Kronprindsens Gade 72 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Tel: (340) 776-7600 Fax: (340) 776-7601 Washington, D.C. 1436 U Street NW, Suite 303 Washington, D.C. 20009 USA Tel: (202) 462-8475 Fax: (202) 462-8478 USAID’s Agribusiness and Trade Expansion Program 4th Floor, Ki-Ab Building Alexander Pushkin Street Kebele 23 Addis Ababa Ethiopia Tel: + 251-(0)11-372-0060/61/62/63/64 Fax: + 251-(0)11-372-0102 () parenthesis indicate use within Ethiopia only Author Willem J. Boot Photography All photos by Willem J. Boot March 2011 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Willem J. Boot for Fintrac Inc., the U.S. contractor implementing USAID/Ethiopia’s Agribusiness and Trade Expansion Program. March 2011 The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENT INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 PART ONE: THE MOTHERLAND OF COFFEE ...................................................................... 2 Culture and Geography ................................................................................................ 2 Coffee Characteristics ................................................................................................. 3 Processing: Sun-dried Natural Coffees vs. Washed Coffees
    [Show full text]
  • Adoption Study of Coffee Production Technologies in South West Ethiopia
    Food Science and Quality Management www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-6088 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0557 (Online) Vol.50, 2016 Adoption Study of Coffee Production Technologies in South West Ethiopia Efrem Asfaw Addisu Bezabh Misganaw Anteneh Tashome Kumela PO box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) Agricultural Economics Extension and Gender Research Abstract The study conducted in five districts of Jimma Zone vis-à-vis Limmu Kosa, Gomma, Gera, Mana and Seka chokorsa among where Jimma Agricultural research center has been popularized and disseminated improved technologies of coffee production such as, varieties, agronomic practices, protection and other management options. The level of adoption of coffee production technologies, obstacles for wide adoption of technologies are not yet conducted and there is no genuine information. Both primary and secondary data were used to generate the required information. Three-stage sampling technique was used to generate primary data from 141 smallholder farmers. Respondents were selected by simple random method. The collected data was analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequency, mean, maximum, minimum and cross tabulation by using SPSS software package. The finding showed that small holder farmers have garden coffee, forest coffee and semi forest coffee which are 32.62%, 15%, 14% and 38.8 % of them have combination of the three coffee farm type respectively. Further, this study showed that selection/CBD resistance, Hybrid and specialty coffee varieties are adopted in the study areas which are 39.86%, 6.52%, 12.32% and 41.3% of the farmers have combination of the three coffee varieties respectively. However, level of adoption of hybrid and specialty coffee varieties are very low.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report International Organization for Migration Special Liaison Office (IOM SLO) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
    2015Annual Report International Organization for Migration Special Liaison Office (IOM SLO) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia IOM OIM IOM PRESENCE In EthIOpIA IOM Presence in Ethiopia ETHIOPIA: Administrative Map (as of 14 January 2011) R ShireERITREA E Legend Tahtay Erob Laelay Adiyabo Mereb Ahferom Gulomekeda \\( Adiyabo Leke D National Capital Ganta Medebay Dalul North Adwa Afeshum Saesie Tahtay Zana Laelay Tsaedaemba Kafta Western Maychew PP Koraro Central Humera Asgede Tahtay Eastern Regional Capital Naeder Werei Hawzen Western Tsimbila Maychew Adet Leke Koneba Berahle Welkait Kelete Atsbi S Tigray Awelallo Wenberta International Boundary Tselemti Kola Degua Tsegede Mekele E Temben Temben P Addi Tselemt Tanqua Afdera Zone 2 Enderta Arekay Abergele Regional Boundary Tsegede Beyeda Ab Ala Mirab Saharti A Armacho Debark Samre Hintalo Erebti Abergele Wejirat Tach Megale Bidu Zonal Boundary Armacho Dabat Janamora Alaje Lay Sahla North Armacho Wegera Southern Ziquala Woreda Boundary Metema Gonder Sekota Endamehoni Raya Wag Azebo Chilga Yalo Amhara East Ofla Teru West Belesa Himra Kurri Gonder Dehana Belesa Lake Dembia Zuria Gaz Alamata Zone 4 Quara Gibla Semera Elidar Takusa Libo Ebenat Gulina Kemkem Bugna Lasta Kobo Awra Afar Gidan Lake Tana South (Ayna) 0 50 100 200 km Ewa Alfa Fogera Gonder North ¹ Lay Zone 1 Farta Meket Guba Lafto Dubti Gayint Asayta Semen Wollo P Jawi Achefer Tach Habru Chifra Bahr Dar East Wadla Delanta G U L F O F A D E N P Gayint Aysaita Creation date:14 Jan.2011 Dera Esite Bahirdar Ambasel Map Doc Name:21_ADM_000_ETH_011411_A0
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Honey Farmers in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia 1
    RUDN Journal of Economics 2020 Vol. 28 No. 1 7–22 http://journals.rudn.ru/economics Вестник РУДН. Серия: Экономика DOI 10.22363/2313-2329-2020-28-1-7-22 Research article UDC 332 Technical efficiency of smallholder honey farmers in Jimma zone, Ethiopia 1 Hailemariam Legesse1, Yadeta Bekele1, Mulubrihan Bayissa1, Tsega Lemma2 1Jimma University P.O. Box 307, Cluj-Napoca, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia 2Stellenbosch University Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa Abstraсt. This study analyzes technical efficiency and determinants of the efficiency of honey production in the Gomma and Gera districts of the Jimma zone. The data were ob- tained from 194 randomly selected honey-producing smallholder farmers. A Cobb – Douglas stochastic frontier production analysis with the inefficiency effect model was used to estimate technical efficiency and identify the determinants of efficiency variations among honey farm- ers. The study showed that several hives and supplementary feeds positively and significantly influenced honey yield. This shows that there is room to increase honey productivity from the current level if farmers can efficiently use these input variables. The result further showed that there were differences in technical efficiency among honey producers in the study area. The discrepancy ratio, γ, which measures the relative deviation of output from the frontier level due to inefficiency, was about 84%. This implies that about 84% of the variation in ho- ney output among the farmers was attributed to technical inefficiency effects. The estimated mean level of technical efficiency of honey producers was about 74%. This reveals that there is a possibility to increase the level of honey output by about 26% through exploiting the exis- ting local practices and technical knowledge of the relatively efficient farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Guide for West Ethiopia
    West ethiopia travel Guide a Binco - Melca Joint initiative taBle of contents Jimma Jimma City Getting there Where to stay? What to see? Day excursions from Jimma Lake Boye Abba Jiffar’s Palace Jiren Mountain Hyena Belt Koffe Swamp Geruke Coffee Forest Overnight excursions from Jimma Belete-Gera Natural Forest Didessa Wildlife Sanctuary Southwest Omo Tribes Chebera Churchura National Park Sheka forest UNESCO Biosphere reserve Disclaimer: The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of BINCO and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the Rufford foundation or the Critical Ecosystem Partnership fund. Acknowledgements We greatly acknowledge the Rufford foundation and the CEPF (Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund) for financially supporting this project. BirdLife International, IUCN and EWNHS are acknowledged for logistic support. The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the European Union, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. A fundamental goal is to ensure that civil society is engaged in biodiversity conservation. his travel guide is a first step towards informing tourists about TWest Ethiopia, an area which is neglected by most tourists and travel guides but with great opportunities in terms of eco-tourism. Tourist facilities in West Ethiopia are generally basic, but public transport is plentiful and the beauty of the landscape and nature and the friendliness of the Oromo people largely compensate for this. < - Gera Agaro Jimma -> Seka Bonga - < Sodo A M 0 Jimma City Jimma is the largest city in West Ethiopia with an estimat- The drive from Addis to Jimma takes you through some ed 200,000 people living in the city and up to 1,000,000 spectacular landscapes, especially when crossing the Omo people in Jimma zone.
    [Show full text]