States' Roles in Shaping High Performance Health Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

STATES’ ROLES IN SHAPING HIGH PERFORMANCE HEALTH SYSTEMS Catherine Hess, Sonya Schwartz, Jill Rosenthal, Andrew Snyder, and Alan Weil National Academy for State Health Policy April 2008 ABSTRACT: States shape the health system in many ways, influencing key components such as insurance coverage, quality of care, and information and provider infrastructures. This report presents findings from the State Health Policies Aimed at Promoting Excellent Systems project, undertaken by the National Academy for State Health Policy, with support from The Commonwealth Fund. After conducting surveys of multiple agencies in states across the country, as well as a review of related literature, this study found that states are pursuing system improvements across the full spectrum of their authority, including health care purchasing, regulation of providers, reporting of performance data, integration of public health with health care approaches, and improving the availability and affordability of health insurance. Despite this activity, this study finds room for states to do much more. Ongoing efforts to track, study and diffuse information on state activities could accelerate adoption of promising policies and practices. Support for this research was provided by The Commonwealth Fund. The views presented here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of The Commonwealth Fund or its directors, officers, or staff. This and other Fund publications are available online at www.commonwealthfund.org. To learn more about new publications when they become available, visit the Fund’s Web site and register to receive e-mail alerts. Commonwealth Fund pub. no. 1115. CONTENTS About the Authors.............................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. vi Executive Summary.......................................................................................................... vii Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Health Insurance Coverage..................................................................................................2 Ensuring Affordable Coverage ......................................................................................2 Streamlining Enrollment and Renewal ..........................................................................7 Designing Benefit Packages ..........................................................................................9 Quality, Safety, and Value.................................................................................................11 Collaborating to Improve Quality of Care...................................................................12 Publicly Reporting Performance Data .........................................................................13 Value-Based Purchasing ..............................................................................................15 Health System Infrastructure .............................................................................................19 Addressing Health System Provider Capacity.............................................................19 Building Information Systems .....................................................................................22 Integrating Health Care and Population-Based Public Health Systems ......................26 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................27 Notes ..................................................................................................................................31 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 States’ Policies to Reduce Costs for Small Employers......................................5 Figure 2 Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State ..........................................6 Figure 3 States with Online Medicaid or SCHIP Applications........................................9 Figure 4 States Covering Adult Dental Services in Medicaid, 2005..............................10 Figure 5 Agencies Reporting Purchasing Requirements for Children’s Preventive Services ..................................................................18 Figure 6 Data Included in Integrated Public Health Information Systems ....................23 Figure 7 Use of Integrated Public Health Information Systems ....................................23 iii ABOUT THE AUTHORS Catherine Hess, M.S.W., is a senior program director with the National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP), where she leads program development and implementation in high performance health systems, community health safety nets, and children’s health coverage. Prior to joining NASHP, Ms. Hess served as an independent consultant to state and federal health agencies and national organizations, and was the first executive director of the national Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs. She has written and spoken extensively on state health policy, particularly health and health care for women, children, youth and families. She holds appointments at the schools of public health at Johns Hopkins University and George Washington University. She has a master of social work degree from Boston University. Sonya Schwartz, J.D., is a program manager at NASHP. She analyzes state policies and practices regarding health insurance coverage, focusing primarily on Medicaid, access to health insurance for the uninsured, and the private health insurance market. Before joining NASHP, Ms. Schwartz was a senior health policy analyst at Families USA, a national, nonprofit organization working to ensure quality health care for all Americans. Ms. Schwartz also served as a National Association of Public Interest Law Fellow at the Food Research and Action Center, a national anti-hunger organization, and also provided legal services to individuals with HIV and AIDS in Los Angeles. Ms. Schwartz received a J.D. from the UCLA School of Law, Public Interest Law and Policy Program. Jill Rosenthal, M.P.H., is a program director at NASHP, where she analyzes policies, provides technical assistance to states, and manages programs on emerging state health policy issues. She focuses primarily on patient safety, and has served on safety-related committees for the Institute of Medicine and the National Quality Forum. She has written extensively on state initiatives to address medical errors and patient safety, as well as children’s health. Ms. Rosenthal has a master’s degree in public health from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Andrew Snyder, M.P.A., is a policy specialist at NASHP. His work focuses on coverage and benefit design in Medicaid, with a focus on oral health policy issues. Prior to joining NASHP, he managed the dental and vision benefits for Wisconsin Medicaid. While there, he staffed a Governor’s Task Force on Access to Dental Care, and assisted in the design of a Web-based, information-exchange tool to help Milwaukee-area hospitals reduce unnecessary duplication of emergency room services. He has a master’s degree in public affairs from the University of Wisconsin–Madison. iv Alan Weil, J.D., M.P.P., is NASHP’s executive director. Mr. Weil previously served as director of the Assessing the New Federalism project at the Urban Institute, held a cabinet position as executive director of the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, and was health policy advisor to Colorado Governor Roy Romer. He also served as assistant general counsel in the Massachusetts Department of Medical Security. Mr. Weil was an appointed member of President Clinton’s Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care Industry. He currently is a member of the Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System, as well as the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. He has written extensively, and is the editor of two books. Mr. Weil received his M.P.P. degree from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and his J.D. from Harvard Law School. Editorial support was provided by Deborah Lorber. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to express their appreciation first and foremost to the state officials who contributed to this report by responding to surveys. We know the heavy demands placed on state officials’ time, and hope this report provides some useful ideas drawn from colleagues in other states. We also want to thank Annette James, a research assistant at NASHP through most of this project, who made substantial contributions in creating, fielding, tracking and following up on the survey instruments, entering data and creating tables for analysis, and contributing her ideas in shaping the project. Alice Lam, a Presidential Management Fellow, contributed extensively to the initial background research and design of the project. Neva Kaye, a NASHP senior program director, provided helpful suggestions and comments during the project. NASHP research assistant Ann Cullen assisted in creating graphs and formatting the report. Elizabeth Osius, also a NASHP research assistant, provided helpful review and editing in the final drafting stages. Four members of the Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System and one additional expert, Dr. Joseph Thompson, the Arkansas Surgeon General, served
Recommended publications
  • The French Health Care System

    The French Health Care System

    The french health care system The french health care system VICTOR RODWIN PROFESSOR OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT WAGNER SCHOOL OF PUBLIC SERVICE, NEW YORK UNIVERSITY NEW YORK, USA ABSTRACT: The French health care system is a model of national health insurance (NHI) that provides health care coverage to all legal residents. It is an example of public social security and private health care financing, combined with a public-private mix in the provision of health care services. The French health care system reflects three underlying political values: liberalism, pluralism and solidarity. This article provides a brief overview of how French NHI evolved since World War II; its financing health care organization and coverage; and most importantly, its overall performance. ntroduction. Evolution, coverage, financing and organization The French health care system is a model of national health Evolution: French NHI evolved in stages and in response to Iinsurance (NHI) that provides health care coverage to all legal demands for extension of coverage. Following its original passage, residents. It is not an example of socialized medicine, e.g. Cuba. in 1928, the NHI program covered salaried workers in industry and It is not an example of a national health service, as in the United commerce whose wages were under a low ceiling (Galant, 1955). Kingdom, nor is it an instance of a government-run health care In 1945, NHI was extended to all industrial and commercial workers system like the United States Veterans Health Administration. and their families, irrespective of wage levels. The extension of French NHI, in contrast, is an example of public, social security and coverage took the rest of the century to complete.
  • Hand Hygiene: Clean Hands for Healthcare Personnel

    Hand Hygiene: Clean Hands for Healthcare Personnel

    Core Concepts for Hand Hygiene: Clean Hands for Healthcare Personnel 1 Presenter Russ Olmsted, MPH, CIC Director, Infection Prevention & Control Trinity Health, Livonia, MI Contributions by Heather M. Gilmartin, NP, PhD, CIC Denver VA Medical Center University of Colorado Laraine Washer, MD University of Michigan Health System 2 Learning Objectives • Outline the importance of effective hand hygiene for protection of healthcare personnel and patients • Describe proper hand hygiene techniques, including when various techniques should be used 3 Why is Hand Hygiene Important? • The microbes that cause healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) can be transmitted on the hands of healthcare personnel • Hand hygiene is one of the MOST important ways to prevent the spread of infection 1 out of every 25 patients has • Too often healthcare personnel do a healthcare-associated not clean their hands infection – In fact, missed opportunities for hand hygiene can be as high as 50% (Chassin MR, Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2015; Yanke E, Am J Infect Control, 2015; Magill SS, N Engl J Med, 2014) 4 Environmental Surfaces Can Look Clean but… • Bacteria can survive for days on patient care equipment and other surfaces like bed rails, IV pumps, etc. • It is important to use hand hygiene after touching these surfaces and at exit, even if you only touched environmental surfaces Boyce JM, Am J Infect Control, 2002; WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care, WHO, 2009 5 Hands Make Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) and Other Microbes Mobile (Image from CDC, Vital Signs: MMWR, 2016) 6 When Should You Clean Your Hands? 1. Before touching a patient 2.
  • Chapter 9: Monitoring, Surveillance, and Investigation of Health Threats

    Chapter 9: Monitoring, Surveillance, and Investigation of Health Threats

    Chapter 9: Monitoring, surveillance, and investigation of health threats SUMMARY POINTS · Monitoring, surveillance and investigation of health threats are vital capabilities for an effective health system. The International Health Regulations (2005) require countries to maintain an integrated, national system for public health surveillance and response, and set out the core capabilities that countries are required to achieve. · Systematic monitoring of serious infectious diseases and other conditions is typically achieved through notifiable diseases legislation based on clinical observation and laboratory confirmation. Clinical and laboratory-based surveillance also provides the basis for systematic collection of vital statistics (births, deaths, causes of death), and may extend to the reporting and analysis of risk factors for noncommunicable diseases and injuries. Systematic collection of these data informs the allocation of resources and facilitates evaluation of community-based and population-level prevention strategies. · Clinical and laboratory surveillance are passive systems that may be enhanced by sentinel surveillance and/or community-based surveillance strategies that rely on a wider range of people, including non-medical personnel. Suspected cases identified in this way must be treated with respect, protected from discrimination, with diagnosis confirmed by qualified health workers at the earliest opportunity. · A significant degree of stigma may attach to some diseases, such as HIV, sexually transmitted infections and diabetes. Notifiable diseases legislation should require the protection of personal information, and clearly define any exceptions. Concerns about discrimination and breach of privacy may be addressed by requiring certain diseases to be reported on an anonymous or de- identified basis. · In some countries, legislation or regulations may be used to establish or enhance a comprehensive public health surveillance system.
  • Nutrition Informatics

    Nutrition Informatics

    Practice Paper of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutrition Informatics ABSTRACT As valued members and decision makers of the health for informatics practice, use of computers greatly facilitates care team, registered dietitians and dietetic technicians, management of large amounts of information. Health registered practice in a wide variety of settings from corporate informatics focuses on the application of information science wellness to the intensive care unit. Each of these work within the health care arena. The field of health informatics settings has unique information needs, but all require that includes medical, nursing, pharmacy, dental, public health, dietetics practitioners have immediate access to accurate and now nutrition informatics. Registered dietitians and information. Successful dietetics practice in today’s rapidly dietetic technicians, registered are now creating nutrition changing environment requires skills in finding, evaluating, informatics as a new area of dietetics practice. Current use of and sharing accurate food and nutrition information. The informatics in health care includes electronic health records, term informatics is used to describe the science of managing, outcomes research, and knowledge acquisition. storing, and communicating information. While not required There is no doubt that food and nutrition practitioners related problem solving and decision-making. Informatics manage large amounts of information on a daily basis. is supported by the use of information standards, processes, The term informatics is used to describe how humans and technology. Figure 2 illustrates some of the myriad ways find, store, analyze, and manage information. Health care that dietetics practitioners in all areas of practice utilize informatics was developed as an area of specialization within informatics tools.
  • Good Pharmacovigilance Practices for the Americas ISBN 978-92-75-13160-2 PANDRH Technical Document Nº 5 Pan American Network on Drug Regulatory Harmonization

    Good Pharmacovigilance Practices for the Americas ISBN 978-92-75-13160-2 PANDRH Technical Document Nº 5 Pan American Network on Drug Regulatory Harmonization

    PANDRH Technical Document Nº 5 Pan American Network on Drug Regulatory Harmonization PANDRH Technical Document Nº 5 Technical PANDRH Working Group on Pharmacovigilance Good Pharmacovigilance Good Pharmacovigilance Practices for the Americas Good Pharmacovigilance Practices for the Practices for the Americas ISBN 978-92-75-13160-2 PANDRH Technical Document Nº 5 Pan American Network on Drug Regulatory Harmonization Worki ng Group on Pharmacov iigil ilance Good Pharmacovigilance Practices for the Americas Washington, DC June 2011 PAHO Headquarters Library – Catalogued at the source Pan American Health Organization. “Good Pharmacovigilance Practices for the Americas”. Washington, D.C.: PAHO, © 2011. (PANDRH Technical Document Nº 5). 73 p. ISBN 978-92-75-13160-2 Published in Spanish with the title: “Buenas Prácticas de Farmacovigilancia para las Américas” Published in Portuguese with the title: “Boas práticas de farmacovigilância para as Américas” I Title 1. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY – legislation and jurisprudence 2. NATIONAL HEALTH SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 3. PHARMACEUTICAL LEGISLATION – standards 4. DRUG LEGISLATION – economics 5. DRUGS AND NARCOTICS CONTROL 6. HEALTH POLICIES 7. AMERICAS NLM QV 733.DA1 Approved by the V PANDRH Conference in 2008. Validated in 2010. © Pan American Health Organization, 2011 All rights reserved. Requests for this publication should be directed to the Area of Health Systems based on Primary Health Care, Project on Essential Medicines and Technologies, Pan American Health Organization / World Health Organization, 525 23rd St., NW, Washington, D.C., USA [phone: +(202) 974-3483; e-mail: cas- [email protected]]. Requests for authorization to reproduce or translate PAHO publications—whether for sale or noncommercial distribution—should be directed to the Area of Knowledge Management and Communications (KMC) at the above address [fax: +(202) 974-3652; e-mail: [email protected]].
  • Monitoring COVID-19 Vaccination Considerations for the Collection and Use of Vaccination Data INTERIM GUIDANCE 3 MARCH 2021

    Monitoring COVID-19 Vaccination Considerations for the Collection and Use of Vaccination Data INTERIM GUIDANCE 3 MARCH 2021

    Monitoring COVID-19 vaccination Considerations for the collection and use of vaccination data INTERIM GUIDANCE 3 MARCH 2021 World Health Organization Avenue Appia 20 1211 Geneva 27 Switzerland www.who.int COUNTRY READINESS AND DELIVERY Monitoring COVID-19 vaccination Considerations for the collection and use of vaccination data INTERIM GUIDANCE 3 MARCH 2021 WHO and UNICEF continue to monitor the situation closely for any changes that may affect this interim guidance. Should any factors change, WHO and UNICEF will issue a further update. Otherwise, this interim guidance will expire 5 years after the date of publication. © World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 2021. Some rights reserved. This work is available under the CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO licence. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WHO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. WHO/2019-nCoV/vaccination/monitoring/2021.1 Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................... iv Abbreviations .................................................................................v 1. Context ...................................................................................1 1.1 Background ..........................................................................1 1.2 Assumptions .........................................................................1 1.3 Purpose of this document ..............................................................1
  • COVID-19 VACCINATION PROGRAM INTERIM PLAYBOOK for JURISDICTION OPERATIONS – October 29, 2020

    COVID-19 VACCINATION PROGRAM INTERIM PLAYBOOK for JURISDICTION OPERATIONS – October 29, 2020

    COVID-19 Vaccination Program Interim Operational Guidance InterimJurisdiction Operational Operations Guidance Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) October 29, 2020 Version 2.0 COVID-19 VACCINATION PROGRAM INTERIM PLAYBOOK FOR JURISDICTION OPERATIONS – October 29, 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................5 Section 1: Public Health Preparedness Planning ........................................................................................................6 Improvement Planning .......................................................................................................................................6 COVID-19 Vaccination Program Planning ...........................................................................................................6 Section 2: COVID-19 Organizational Structure and Partner Involvement ..................................................................8 Planning and Coordination Team (Internal) .......................................................................................................8 State-Local Coordination ....................................................................................................................................8 Tribal Nations and Tribal Communities ..............................................................................................................9 COVID-19 Vaccination Program Implementation
  • Healthy Hospitals Health Planet Healthy People, Addressing Climate Change in Health Care Settings

    Healthy Hospitals Health Planet Healthy People, Addressing Climate Change in Health Care Settings

    HEALTHY HOSPITALS HEALTHY PLANET HEALTHY PEOPLE Addressing climate change in health care settings Discussion Draft Acknowledgements This paper is based on the deliberations and recommendations of the World Health Assembly (See Assembly document WHA61/14 and reso- This paper is the first step in a WHO project in lution WHA61.19), and WHO Executive Board Resolutions EB124.R5 collaboration with Health Care Without Harm on Climate Change and Health, as well as the World Health Day report (HCWH) aimed at addressing the climate on Climate Change and Health (http://www.who.int/world-health-day/ footprint of the health sector. previous/2008/en/index.html). A second step, to be taken together with HCWH, the Health and Environment Alliance WHO acknowledges the insight and valuable contributions to the (HEAL) and other intergovernmental and nongovernmental organizations, will be a series of review of this discussion draft provided in particular by Connie consultations that will lead to the establishment of Matthiessen and Joshua Karliner from Health Care Without Harm who a global network for climate-friendly health care. prepared the initial draft. The network will be a knowledge-based learning network and community of practice that Relevant WHO staff and other experts extensively reviewed this publica- supports efforts to mitigate the climate footprint tion, WHO expresses its appreciation of the contributions made by the of the health sector. It will serve as a vehicle for following experts who assisted in reviewing the report: information exchange and will provide technical tools for the health sector on how to improve energy efficiency, the built environment, From WHO: James Atkinson, Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum, Carlos Dora, alternative energy generation, sustainable Elaine Fletcher, Annette Kuesel, Nada Osseiran, Carmem Pessoa Silva, transportation, and procurement.
  • How to Measure the Value of Virtual Health Care

    How to Measure the Value of Virtual Health Care

    Digital Article Technology How to Measure the Value of Virtual Health Care by Meg Barron, Vimal Mishra, Stacy Lloyd, and Jared Augenstein This document is authorized for use only by TAFT BHUKET ([email protected]). Copying or posting is an infringement of copyright. Please contact [email protected]/17 or 800-988-0886 for additional copies. HBR / Digital Article / How to Measure the Value of Virtual Health Care How to Measure the Value of Virtual Health Care by Meg Barron, Vimal Mishra, Stacy Lloyd, and Jared Augenstein Published on HBR.org / June 24, 2021 / Reprint H06FNF Steven Puetzer/Getty Images The Covid-19 pandemic has spurred a dramatic increase in virtual health care in the United States. The rise has been driven by the need for social distancing and enabled by a wide range of policy flexibilities implemented by federal and state legislators, regulators, and payers. However, many of these allowances are temporary. As the pandemic ebbs, policymakers and payers are deciding whether and how much to pay for virtual care services in the future, leaving clinicians uncertain about whether they will be able to afford to continue their virtual care programs. But parties are often making these decisions based on outdated or limited Copyright © 2021 Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved. 1 This document is authorized for use only by TAFT BHUKET ([email protected]). Copying or posting is an infringement of copyright. Please contact [email protected]/17 or 800-988-0886 for additional copies. HBR / Digital Article / How to Measure the Value of Virtual Health Care measures of success that do not holistically reflect the realities of how value is being generated.
  • Principles for Health Care Reform

    Principles for Health Care Reform

    444 East Algonquin Road Arlington Heights, IL 60005-4664 ASPS POSITION STATEMENT 847-228-9900 www.plasticsurgery.org ASPS PRINCIPLES FOR HEALTH CARE REFORM While the ACA resulted in a number of desirable reforms, including coverage of pre-existing conditions, removal of lifetime caps, and coverage of children to age 26, the American health care system remains beset by a number of serious problems. Health insurance costs continue to rise, and private insurers draw ever-more-narrow networks, threatening broad access to care. Health system consolidation has exploded, threatening the viability of private practice and increasing costs to patients, taxpayers, and insurers. Well-meaning efforts to use alternative payment methods to reward the value of care, rather than the volume, have resulted in systems ill-equipped to integrate, analyze and reward specialist services. These systems threaten the viability of independent medical practices across the country, while causing physicians to retire early or sell their practices to large corporations and hospitals As the 115th Congress begins and a new administration takes power, policymakers are poised to again undertake health care reform. The following are key principles that the American Society of Plastic Surgeons believes must accompany such an effort. MAKE PATIENT ACCESS TO CARE PRIORITY ONE Patients should have timely access to high-quality medical care from the appropriate provider. To advance this goal, health care reform must - o Maximize the availability of high-quality, affordable coverage. o Prohibit denial or cancellation of coverage for pre-existing conditions. o Prohibit denial or cancellation of policies when a patient becomes sick. o Prohibit annual and lifetime caps.
  • Recommended Practices for Surveillance: Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), Inc

    Recommended Practices for Surveillance: Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), Inc

    Recommended practices for surveillance: Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), Inc. Terrie B. Lee, RN, MS, MPH, CIC, Ona G. Montgomery, RN, MSHA, CIC, James Marx, RN, MS, CIC, Russell N. Olmsted, MPH, CIC, and William E. Scheckler, MD Surveillance in public health is defined as ‘‘the on- the frequency of adverse events such as infection or going, systematic collection, analysis, interpretation, injury. Although the goal of contemporary infection and dissemination of data regarding a health-related prevention and control programs is to eliminate HAIs, event for use in public health action to reduce morbid- epidemiologic surveillance is still required for accurate ity and mortality and to improve health.’’1 Infection quantification of events and demonstration of perfor- control professionals apply this definition to both re- mance improvement. duce and prevent health care–associated infections Although there is no single or ‘‘right’’ method of sur- (HAIs) and enhance patient safety. Surveillance, as veillance design or implementation, sound epidemio- part of infection prevention and control programs in logic principles must form the foundation of effective health care facilities, contributes to meeting the pro- systems and be understood by key participants in the gram’s overall goals, namely: (1) protect the patient; surveillance program and supported by senior man- (2) protect the health care worker, visitors, and others agement. Teamwork and collaboration across the in the health care environment; and
  • Overview of Health Policy

    Overview of Health Policy

    CHAPTER 1 OVERVIEW OF HEALTH POLICY I have never had a policy. I have simply tried to do what seemed best each day, as each day came. —Abraham Lincoln The health and vitality of our people are at least as well worth conserving as their forests, waters, lands, and minerals, and in this great work the national government must bear a most important part. —Theodore Roosevelt L EARNING O BJECTIVES After completing this chapter, you should be able to ➤ define key terms related to health policy, ➤ appreciate the influence of health determinants, ➤ understand the framework of health policy formulation, ➤ identify the stakeholders in health policy, ➤ describe the major types of health policies, and ➤ discuss the importance of studying health policy. 3 This is an unedited proof. Copying and distribution of this PDF is prohibited without written permission. For permission, please contact Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com. 4 Introduction to Health Policy C ASE S TUDY 1 HEALTHCARE REFORM: HILLARY CLINTON AND BARACK OBAMA Two major healthcare reform initiatives have played out on the US political landscape since the late twentieth century: the Health Security Act, developed by the Clinton administration in the 1990s and spearheaded by then First Lady Hillary Clinton, which failed to pass into law, and the Affordable Care Act (ACA), drafted by the Obama administration, which became federal law in March 2010. The hallmark of the Clinton plan was its universal coverage mandate, which required all employers to contribute to a pool of funds to cover the costs of insurance premiums for their workers, with caps on total employer costs and subsidies for small businesses.