DOCSLIB.ORG

Greater Jakarta Area (Jabodetabek) Indonesia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DATA COLLECTION REPORT Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI) for Asian Cities GREATER JAKARTA AREA (JABODETABEK) INDONESIA Dr. Muhammad Nanang Prayudyanto (Consultant) Dr. Muiz Thohir (GJTA) 2017 1 TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT .................................................................................................................................. 2 LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Current state of urban transport systems and service ...................................................................... 7 3. Data collection approach for SUTI ................................................................................................... 11 4. Data for SUTI (key data – detail in Excel sheet) ............................................................................... 12 a. Indicator 1 Extent to which transport plans cover facilities for active modes and public transport ...................................................................................................................................... 12 b. Indicator 2. Modal Share of Active and Public Transport in Commuting .................................... 18 c. Indicator 3. Convenient Access to Public Transport Service........................................................ 20 d. Indicator 4. Public Transport Quality and Reliability ................................................................... 22 e. Indicator 5. Traffic fatalities per 100,000 inhabitants. ................................................................ 24 f. Indicator 6. Travel Cost as a share of Income .............................................................................. 25 g. Indicator 7. Ratio of fare revenue to operating costs for public transport systems (‘Fare box ratio’) ........................................................................................................................................... 25 h. Indicator 8. Investment in Public Transport System .................................................................... 26 i. Indicator 9. Air Quality (PM10) .................................................................................................... 26 j. Indicator 10. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. .................................................................................... 28 5. Analysis of data (input data in Excel sheet and results) .................................................................. 29 6. Perspective on SUTI pilot exercise ................................................................................................... 30 7. Useful references and persons, experts and officials met .............................................................. 31 8. Annexes; useful data and material such as city transport plan, photographs of urban transport systems etc. ............................................................................................................................................. 31 2 LIST OF FIGURES 1.1 Area of Greater Jakarta 5 1.2 Land Use of Greater Jakarta 6 1.3 Urban Density in Greater Jakartra. 7 2.1 Traffic density during 2002, 2010 and 2020 clockwise 8 2.2 Person Trip Distribution 9 2.3 Road Network in Greater Jakarta 10 4.1 Four Component in the Indicator 1 13 4.2 The Greater Jakarta Public Transport Network Plan in 2019 16 4.3 Jakarta LRT Network Plan 16 4.4 Pedestrian Facilities Program in Central Jakarta 17 4.5 Campaign for Pedestrian “Right” to Educate Motor Cyclist Not Using the Facilities 17 4.6 Bicycle Facility in the campus area at University of Indonesia Depok 17 4.7 Public Bicycle at Tourist Area at Heritage “Old Town” Jakarta 18 4.8 Intermodal Facility at the Railway Station 18 4.9 Automatic Parking using E-Money at Railway station 18 4.10 Progress of MRT Construction in Jakarta 20 4.11 Progress of LRT Construction at Jakarta Toll Road to Bogor 20 4.12 Public Transport Service Area 22 4.13 Public Transport Quality and Realibility- 2012 23 4.14 Fatalities during Latest 5 Years in GJTA 25 4.15 Fatalities by Mode (2015) 25 5.1 Spider Diagram of Greater Jakarta 29 3 LIST OF TABLES 1.1 Table Population of Greater Jakarta 7 2.1 Public Transport Service Financing 10 4.1 Indicator 1 for Greater Jakarta 14 4.2 Table Modal Share by Income Level 19 4.3 Average number of trips per person by main mode of transport 20 4.4 Public Transport Service Area 21 4.5 Public Buses Quality and Realibility- 2017 24 4.6 Traffic Accident 24 4.7 Vehicle Emission Standard for Jakarta 27 4.8 Air Quality 28 4.9 Traffic Volume in Jakarta 28 4.10 Estimated Emission from Traffic Volumes 28 4.11 Estimated Emission from Fuel Sales 28 7.1 List of Person Contacts 30 4 Annex 1: Greater Jakarta Collection Report 1. Introduction Jakarta is the capital city of Republic Indonesia and the importance for the regional economy activities. Along with rapid economic growth and urbanization, Jakarta has severed with traffic and transportation problems in the last 20 years. The economic growth are double to the national average growth as the results of rampant economic investment. Thus, the city attract more people, and best national young talent to come. Inevitably, the city are sprawling, and it creates a metro area that we called Greater Jakarta which comprises of 8 cities surrounded. The total area of the Jakarta city only 9% of total the greater area, and the ratio of built up areas are ±20%. Figure 1.1 Area of Greater Jakarta 5 Figure 1.2. Land Use of Greater Jakarta Greater Jakarta is urban agglomeration which covers six cities and three regencies i,e. Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, Bekasi, Tangerang Selatan, Bekasi regency, Tangerang regency and Bogor Regency. The population has reached ±30 million and density is 4,461 person/km2. The population mostly distributed in the centre part, northern part, and also eastern part of the metro area. The housing price in the centre has gentrified middle and lower income people to live in urban fringe. Nevertheless, the centre part of areas are still populous. Particular lower income worker could not afford the transport cost to travel from urban fringe to centre. Thus, slums and squatters area are obviously seen in particular place in the city of Jakarta side by side with luxury apartment. 6 Figure 1.3 Urban Density in Greater Jakartra Table 1.1 Table Population of Greater Jakarta Name of The City Area (Km2) Population (in Density Projection of million) (Pop/km2) 20 years Growth (%) JAKARTA (CITY) 662,33 10,08 15231,9 0,86 BOGOR REGENCY 2997,13 5,1 1705,8 1,22 BEKASI REGENCY 1269,51 2,81 2219,8 1,22 BOGOR (CITY) 111,73 1,03 9269,9 1,49 BEKASI (CITY) 213,58 2,54 11914,3 1,49 DEPOK (CITY) 199,44 1,89 9500,5 1,49 TANGERANG REGENCY 1011,86 3,13 3101,4 1,59 TANGERANG (CITY) 153,93 2,02 13163,6 1,99 SOUTH TANGERANG 147,19 1,45 9876,0 1,99 SELATAN (CITY) TOTAL 6766,7 30,1 2. Current state of urban transport systems and service Private vehicles in urban growth has increased significantly, while the shares of public transport capital from year to year tends to decrease. In the 2000 the use of public transport reached 58% and significantly decreased in 2010 to 28%. 7 The motorization dependency in Jakarta somehow occurs due to a prior policy fallacy. Unreliable public transport has triggered a car explosion usage for daily commuting that is driven by car industries promotion and affordable fuel price. The Central statistics data shows that the private cars and motorcycle ownership grows 12% in average each year as a natural effort by each individual to fulfill their mobility needs. The gentrification process creates more travel-km that is produced by lower and middle income who mostly dwell in urban fringe and work in the center. As the consequences, Jakarta now notoriously known as 7th worst traffic in the world. Annually, Jakarta suffers from an economic loss of 46 trillion IDR, or equal to 3,8 billion EUR, due to transport congestion. Fig.2.1. Traffic density by JICA (Bappenas, 2004) shows the location of traffic attraction during 2002, 2010 and 2020 (est.)- clockwise Figure 2.1 Traffic density during 2002, 2010 and 2020 -clockwise 8 Figure 2.2 Person Trip Distribution Jakarta government applies pro-poor policy through subsidized BRT ticket and Commuter rail fare. The policy has been pleased by the Jakarta Government ordinance No. 5/2014, and also National Act No. 22/2009. The fare discount is applied to encourage people shift from private vehicle to public transport. The table (x) shows the public transport option in Jakartra. The Transjakarta system applies flat fare for any trips in inner Jakarta system network, but the commuter line uses distance-based fare ticket. Both of them are subsidized in order to make it cheap. In addition, Jakarta government also starts to establish ticket integration between Transjakarta and Commuter Line using electronic transport card. However, commuters still must pay a penalty fare while they transfer to intermediate bus network and angkot which is still unintegrated and unreliable. Currently, Jakarta has two kinds of rapid transit system: Transjakarta BRT and Commuter Rail (KRL). Both of the system only serve the trunk network.
Recommended publications
  • Owner Estimate for Urban Bus Services 2020

    Owner Estimate for Urban Bus Services 2020

    OWNER ESTIMATE FOR URBAN BUS SERVICES 2020 1 Owner Estimate for Urban Bus Services A guideline for service providers/operators 2020 Author Dr. Okto Risdianto Manullang, ST., MT. Contact Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1-5 65760 Eschborn Tel +49 (0) 6196 79-0 Fax +49 (0) 6196 79-11 15 www.giz.de Editors Ari Nova Firnanda Achmad Zacky Ambadar Maulana Ichsan Gituri Cover designer Nabila Fauzia Rahman DISCLAIMER The analysis, results, and recommendations in this paper represent the opinion of the author(s) and are not necessarily representative of the position of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH or BMUB. Partial or total reproduction of this document authorized for non-profit purposes provided the source is acknowledged. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government of Indonesia, through the Ministry of Transportation, has committed to provide support and assistance in the development of public transportation systems in all cities in Indonesia. It aims to provide incentives to local governments to immediately take the necessary actions to help accelerate public transport reform in their respective cities. To realize this, the calculation of vehicle operating costs (BOK) needed as an indicator of determining minimum tariffs or providing subsidies. The commonly used calculation methods in the calculation of vehicle operating costs refer to the Decree of Directorate General of Land Transportation and Transjakarta's calculation methods. Each of those calculation methods have advantages and disadvantages. The Decree of Directorate General of Land Transportation’s method has advantages in the right understanding of the calculation component. In contrast, Transjakarta’s method has advantages in practical worksheets and can provide comprehensive information.
  • An Inquiry to Semanggi Tragedy's Significance On

    An Inquiry to Semanggi Tragedy's Significance On

    International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research Volume 02 Number 01 | June 2018 p-issn: 2581-1347 | e-issn: 2580-2607 | Pg. 01 - 14 ‘Tragedy’ and Space of Commemoration: An Inquiry to Semanggi Tragedy’s Significance on Jakarta’s Urban Space Feby Hendola1 1 Departement of Architecture, Faculty of Technology and Design, Universitas Pembangunan Jaya, Indonesia [email protected] ABSTRACT A City does not only exist with its physical feature but also with its intangible thing within it, including the people’s memory. Our memory, either it is delightful or unpleasant, plays a role in molding our perception about our environment. Meanwhile, we also tend to build something—to construct our environment—for commemorating significant events. Regarding this phenomenon, this paper aimed to understand how a tragic event affects urban space by examining conceptions of “tragedy” and “absential feature” and their relation to space of commemoration. As a reflection of the conceptual inquiry, this paper analyzed how Semanggi Tragedy, which had happened on 1998-1999, affected Jakarta’s urban space. The study showed that the tragedy brought ‘absence’ that urges people to create a tangible feature to response their grief, loss, and hopes. Semanggi’s physical development—as a way to move on—only emphasizes the ‘absence’ of the tragedy and does not stop people not to forget it. © 2018 IJBESR. All rights reserved. Keywords: absential feature, 1998 riots, semanggi tragedy, space of commemoration, urban conflicts 1. Introduction sense, to remember is not merely to be nostalgic but also to feel ‘emptiness’ that does and will A City does not only exist with its physical continually exist.
  • Initiating Bus Rapid Transit in Jakarta, Indonesia

    Initiating Bus Rapid Transit in Jakarta, Indonesia

    Initiating Bus Rapid Transit in Jakarta, Indonesia John P. Ernst On February 1, 2004, a 12.9-km (8-mi) bus rapid transit (BRT) line began the more developed nations, the cities involved there frequently lack revenue operation in Jakarta, Indonesia. The BRT line has incorporated three critical characteristics more common to cities in developing most of the characteristics of BRT systems. The line was implemented in countries: only 9 months at a cost of less than US$1 million/km ($1.6 million/mi). Two additional lines are scheduled to begin operation in 2005 and triple 1. High population densities, the size of the BRT. While design shortcomings for the road surface and 2. Significant existing modal share of bus public transportation, terminals have impaired performance of the system, public reaction has and been positive. Travel time over the whole corridor has been reduced by 3. Financial constraints providing a strong political impetus to 59 min at peak hour. Average ridership is about 49,000/day at a flat fare reduce, eliminate, or prevent continuous subsidies for public transit of 30 cents. Furthermore, 20% of BRT riders have switched from private operation. motorized modes, and private bus operators have been supportive of expanding Jakarta’s BRT. Immediate improvements are needed in the These three characteristics combine to favor the development of areas of fiscal handling of revenues and reconfiguring of other bus routes. financially self-sustaining BRT systems that can operate without gov- The TransJakarta BRT is reducing transport emissions for Jakarta and ernment subsidy after initial government expenditures to reallocate providing an alternative to congested streets.
  • Kualitas Pelayanan Badan Layanan Umum Transjakarta Pada Penumpang Penyandang Cacat Fisik (Difabel)

    Kualitas Pelayanan Badan Layanan Umum Transjakarta Pada Penumpang Penyandang Cacat Fisik (Difabel)

    KUALITAS PELAYANAN BADAN LAYANAN UMUM TRANSJAKARTA PADA PENUMPANG PENYANDANG CACAT FISIK (DIFABEL) SKRIPSI diajukan untuk memenuhi salah satu syarat ujian sarjana strata-1 pada program studi administrasi negara Oleh: ZAHROTUL ADDAWIYAH ISKANDAR 072759 FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA SERANG 2011 ABSTRAK Zahrotul Addawiyah I, NIM 072759, Kualitas Pelayanan Badan Layanan Umum Transjakarta Pada Penumpang Penyandang Cacat Fisik (Difabel), program studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang 2011. Pembimbing I Maulana Yusuf, S, IP. Msi. Pembimbing II Kandung Sapto Nugroho, S.sos, M.si. Kata Kunci: Aksesibilitas, Penyandang Cacat Fisik, Transjakarta Fokus penelitian ini adalah kualitas pelayanan badan layanan umum transjakarta pada penumpang penyandang cacat fisik (difabel). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana kualitas pelayanan badan layanan umum transjakarta pada penumpang penyandang cacat fisik (difabel). Berdasarkan tujuan penelitian tersebut, maka metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dan snow ball sampling. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa kualitas pelayanan badan layanan umum transjakarta pada penumpang penyandang cacat fisik (difabel) adalah tidak optimal. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari banyaknya petugas yang tidak mengamalkan sistem 4S (sapa, sopan, sabar, senyum) terhadap pelanggan transjakarta, infrastruktur yang tidak memadai bagi penyandang cacat fisik (difabel) seperti trotoar, jembatan penyebrangan, halte, adanya gap platform, dan audiovisual yang bobrok, headway yang sangat lama, tidak adanya pelatihan khusus bagi pegawai transjakarta dalam melayani penyandang cacat fisik (difabel), banyak fasilitas yang tidak terawat, kurangnya pengawasan pegawai transjakarta dan sulitnya melakukan pengaduan layanan, kurangnya sosialisasi program pemberdayaan transjakarta seperti temu pelanggan, wisata busway, park and ride busway.
  • Analysis of Tariff Integration Between MRT and Transjakarta*

    Analysis of Tariff Integration Between MRT and Transjakarta*

    Advances in Engineering Research, volume 193 2nd International Symposium on Transportation Studies in Developing Countries (ISTSDC 2019) Analysis of Tariff Integration Between MRT and TransJakarta* Kevin Ginevra Arota Hulu Andyka Kusuma Civil Engineering Department Civil Engineering Department University of Indonesia University of Indonesia Depok, Indonesia Depok, Indonesia [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—The Tariff Integration System is a tariff payment residents to reduce transportation cost. Tariff integration system where users of public transportation make payments allows passengers to use several transportation modalities only once but can use two or more modes of public by only buying one ticket, which can be used for a short transportation. For this study, the modes of transportation period or can also have seasonal validity [4]. Therefore, this reviewed are TransJakarta and MRT. The purpose of this study tries to find out what the people of Jakarta perceive study is to find out the preferences that affect the community regarding tariff integration, to know the factors that can about the tariff integration system. influence people's behaviour towards tariff integration, as well as the preference for integration rates for the community. The II. TARIFF INTEGRATION SYSTEM data collection method for this study is the Stated Preference Method. The survey conducted in two places, namely in the The Integration Tariff system allows passengers to use downtown and in the suburbs. The survey in the downtown is several transportation modalities (for example, intercity and held at the Bendungan Hilir Shelter (TransJakarta Corridor 1) city buses, subways, local trains, and ferries).
  • Social Impact of Railway Project A

    Social Impact of Railway Project A

    SOCIAL IMPACT OF RAILWAY PROJECT A CASE STUDY OF MASS RAPID TRANSIT (MRT) JAKARTA, INDONESIA DAMPAK SOSIAL PROYEK KERETA API STUDI KASUS MASS RAPID TRANSIT (MRT) JAKARTA, INDONESIA Listifadah Research and Development Land Transportation-Ministry of Transportation Jl. Medan Merdeka Timur No. 5 Jakarta Pusat 10110 email: [email protected] Diterima: 11 November 2014, Revisi 1: 1 Desember 2014, Revisi 2: 10 Desember 2014, Disetujui: 19 Desember 2014 ABSTRACT Jakarta MRT system had been planned since the 1980’s. Many constraints such as political, finan- cial, as well as bureaucratic make the project delayed for a long time. When the plan scheduled to be implemented in a couple years ago, some protests arise. Communities and some interest group against. The fears of income decline and loss of livelihood become their main concerns which in- duce protests before the project really started. Based on this experience, this paper tries to reveal social impacts of transport development in case MRT Jakarta. Now the project construction is being carried out. Social impact as well as the project construction continues. This study investigate how social impact of railway project was happened. Literatures and documents analysis was used to analyze this study. The result of the study were the MRT Jakarta project inevitably have negative and positive impacts both for society and environment. But with the start of the project after a long delay, it gives hope to the community for better transportation. It is a positive impact before the project was completed. Community engagement in a meeting or discusssion should more be em- phasized in the process in order to minimize the conflicts of interest.
  • Service Failure in Jakarta Public Bus Transport

    Service Failure in Jakarta Public Bus Transport

    Faculty of Economic Sciences, Communication and IT Doddy Hendra Wijaya SERVICE FAILURE IN JAKARTA PUBLIC BUS TRANSPORT Service Science Project Report Date/Term: Spring 2009 Supervisors: Bo Enquist Samuel Petros Sebhatu Karlstads Universitets 651 88 Karlstad Tfn 054-700 10 00 Fax 054-700 14 60 [email protected] www.kau.se 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background Populations in most developing countries are increasing much faster than car ownership levels and therefore an increasing proportion of the population is dependent on public transport except for very short journeys. In most countries, walking is the most common mode of travel for distances of up to one or two kilometers in urban areas and much further in rural areas. Those who own bicycles tend to use them for journeys of up to about eight kilometers, beyond which public transport is preferred mode. Public transport also provides an alternative to those who have private transport, but are sometimes deterred from using it by traffic congestion, parking difficulties or problems in accessing certain streets, although in practice it is relatively unusual, particularly in developing countries, for car owners to use public transport to any significant extent. However, in many developing countries families tend to be large, so that even if these is a car belonging to a household, most members of the family are still likely to use public transport for at least some of their travel (Iles 2005) Public transport is therefore vital for the vast majority without access to private transport. There is need for personal mobility, in particular for access to employment opportunities, but with low income levels affordability is a common problem, while the services provided are often regarded as inadequate.
  • Sustainable Urban Transport Development in Indonesia

    Sustainable Urban Transport Development in Indonesia

    Transport and Climate Change Week: SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA Ikhwan Hakim Director of Transportation Ministry of National Development Planning Indonesia Presented at Transport and Climate Change Week Berlin, 18-20 September 2017 Sustainability Issues in Urban Development (1/2) REPUBLIK INDONESIA High UrbanisaFon Rate 76% Environmental Impacts 100% 59% 64% 68% 72% 41% 36% • 50% 32% 28% 24% The transport sector accounts for 27% of CO2 emissions. In developing countries, CO2 0% emissions from transportaon will increase 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 by two 7mes in the period 1980 - 2030. Urban Populaon Rural Populaon • In DKI Jakarta (2008-2013) indicators of In 2015: Indonesia (2.69%), India (2.38%), China (2.3%) urban air quality such as PM10 increased by 20%, CO increased 70%, and NO2 increased Rapid MotorizaFon by 350%. 100,000,000 92,976,240 50,000,000 12,599,138 - Massive Urban Land Conversion 1954 1964 1974 1984 1994 2004 2014 • Rapid changes of low density areas into Private Car Bus Truck Motorcycle high densi7es. Agricultural land and green areas turned into residen7al areas. High Traffic Fatality • In Jakarta Metropolitan Area, within • Traffic fatality in 2016 1985-2002, the residen7al land use was almost 26.000. increased from 11% to 22% (2 7mes) and • In 2016, 72% of traffic industrial land use increased from 4.75% accidents involve to 7.5%. While, agricultural land use motorcycles. decreased from 45% to 24%. Sustainability Issues in Urban Development (2/2) REPUBLIK INDONESIA Deterioraon of Urban Public Transport (current share is around 20%) URBAN GRIDLOCK V/C Rao 2020: > 1.2 DKI Jakarta (2010) 2% 19% 62% 23% Hong Kong (2011) 25% 63% 11% Tokyo (2009) 48% 3% 12% 37% Singapore (2011) (2011) 19% 29% 29% 23% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Rail Non-Rail Public Transport Private Transport Others Severe Traffic Congeson • Economic losses due to traffic conges7on in Jakarta reach USD 3 billion in 2016.
  • Japan-ASEAN Connectivity Initiative(PDF)

    Japan-ASEAN Connectivity Initiative(PDF)

    November. 2020 Japan-ASEAN Connectivity Initiative MOFA Japan has supported ASEAN's efforts to strengthen connectivity in order to narrow the gaps in the ASEAN region and further facilitate the integration of ASEAN community based on the Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity (MPAC) 2025 and Ayeyawady-Chao Phraya-Mekong Economic Cooperation Strategy (ACMECS) Masterplan. Japan will continue to provide support in this field. Japan has announced its decision to support strengthening ASEAN connectivity both in hard and soft ware with focus on the ongoing 2 trillion yen worth of land, sea, and air corridor connectivity infrastructure projects as below, together with capacity building projects for 1,000 individuals over the next three years. “Land Corridor” East-West Corridor *The following connectivity projects include projects （Thailand） The road connecting Da Nang, Viet Nam under consideration. （Cambodia） ・Mass Transit System Project and Mawlamyaing, Myanmar ・National Road No. 5 Improvement Project “Sea and Air corridor” in Bangkok (RED LINE) Southern Corridor （ ） （Myanmar） The road connecting Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam Cambodia ・ ・Bago River Bridge Construction Project and Dawei, Myanmar Sihanoukville Port New Container Terminal Development Project ・East-West Economic Corridor Improvement Project Mandalay Hanoi ・ ・East-West Economic Corridor Highway Development The Project for Port EDI for Port Myanmar Modernization Project (Phase 2)(New Bago-Kyaikto Highway Section) Naypyidaw Laos （Myanmar） ・Infrastructure Development Project in Thilawa Area Phase
  • Evaluation of Online Motorcycle Taxi Performance in Surabaya And

    Evaluation of Online Motorcycle Taxi Performance in Surabaya And

    Journal of Technology and Social Science (JTSS) Evaluation of Online Motorcycle Taxi Performance in Surabaya and Sidoarjo Area, Indonesia Wicaksono, Achmad 1,a, Harnen Sulistio 1, b, Alan Wahyudi Wardani 1 and Dwa Aulia Bramiana 1 1Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 65145, Indonesia a<[email protected]>, b<[email protected]> Keywords:Online motorcycle taxi, GO-JEK, Importance Performance Analysis, Stated Preference Analysis, Indonesia Abstract. Surabaya is the second biggest city in Indonesia, and Sidoarjo is a regency close to Surabaya, where many people live in but they work in Surabaya. More and more citizen of Surabaya and Sidoarjo use motorcycle taxi, either conventional service or online service so call as “ojek”, operated by the company called as GO-JEK. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the performance of GO-JEK in Surabaya and Sidoarjo based on user point-of-view and to observe what factors that influence the users in selecting either conventional or on-line ojek. The methods used are the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) and the Stated Preference Technique. The IPA shows that there are 3 factors that have to be improved: firstly, driving manner, secondly, attention to maximum capacity and thirdly, helmet for the passenger. The Stated Preference Analysis shows that there are two major factors affecting the choice whether GO-JEK or conventional ojek, these are trip cost and waiting time to pick up by the ojek. 1. Introduction Surabaya is the second biggest City in Indonesia, with the population of 2.5 million. Sidoarjo is a regency that has a borderline with Surabaya, where many people live in but they work in Surabaya.
  • Annual-Report-MRT-Jakarta-2017.Pdf

    Annual-Report-MRT-Jakarta-2017.Pdf

    Laporan Tahunan Annual Report 2017 ACHIEVING THE MILESTONES PT MRT Jakarta Wisma Nusantara 21st Floor Jl. MH. Thamrin 59 ReportAnnual Laporan Tahunan Jakarta, 10350 - Indonesia Tlp: (+62-21) 3906456 Fax: (+62-21) 3155846 2017 (+62-21) 3142273 www.jakartamrt.co.id ACHIEVING THE MILESTONES Laporan Tahunan Annual Report 2017 SANGGAHAN DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB Disclaimer Laporan Tahunan ini memuat berbagai pernyataan This Annual Report contains various statements terkait kondisi keuangan, operasi, kebijakan, regarding financial and operational conditions, proyeksi, rencana, strategi, serta tujuan Perseroan, policies, projection, plans, strategies, as well as yang digolongkan sebagai pernyataan ke depan the Company’s objectives, which are classified as dalam pelaksanaan perundang-undangan yang forward-looking statements in the implementation berlaku. Pernyataan-pernyataan tersebut memiliki of the applicable laws. Such forward-looking prospek risiko, serta ketidakpastian, hingga statements have known and unknown risks kemungkinan perbedaan dengan perkembangan (prospective) and uncertainties, which could cause aktual. Berbagai pernyataan prospektif dalam the actual results to differ from the expected Laporan Tahunan ini disusun berdasarkan asumsi- results. Prospective statements in this Annual Report asumsi mengenai kondisi terkini, serta proyeksi are prepared based on numerous assumptions atas situasi mendatang, terkait lingkungan bisnis concerning current conditions as well as projection Perseroan. Perseroan tidak menjamin bahwa of the coming future
  • Youth Perception on Features and Accessibility of Bus Rapid Transit Mebidang in Bridging Interconnected Areas in North Sumatera

    Youth Perception on Features and Accessibility of Bus Rapid Transit Mebidang in Bridging Interconnected Areas in North Sumatera

    International Journal of Research and Review www.ijrrjournal.com E-ISSN: 2349-9788; P-ISSN: 2454-2237 Research Paper Youth Perception on Features and Accessibility of Bus Rapid Transit Mebidang in Bridging Interconnected Areas in North Sumatera Yusuf Aulia Lubis, Sirojuzilam, Suwardi Lubis Regional Planning Department, School of Post-Graduate, University of Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia Corresponding Author: Yusuf Aulia Lubis ABSTRACT One of Indonesian problems in infrastructure development is how to nationally avail Bus Rapid Transit having transit rail system in its development system. In the macroeconomic perspective, the availability of urban transport infrastructure services can affect the marginal productivity of private capital, while in the microeconomic perspective; such services can also decrease production costs. Moreover, the contribution of urban transport infrastructure to improving quality of life is indicated by the increase in welfare, productivity and access to employment, as well as macroeconomic stability. This research is descriptive trying to gain youth’s perception on Bus Rapid Transit in Medan. In this study, the primary and secondary data sources are used and the populations include all users of Trans Mebidang. The samples are taken from those using the routes of Tanjug Anom to Down Town (or Pusat Kota), Jamin Ginting to Down Town, and Simpang Pos to Down Town and the samples chosen are only 15% of population. Sampling technique is purposive and accidental. It can be concluded that partially the Feature Perception (X1) gives impacts on the uutilization of Trans Mebidang and partially the Accessibility Perception also brings effect to the utilization of Trans Mebidang. Keywords: perception, features, accessibility, bus rapid transit, Medan INTRODUCTION Mamminasata).