sign in sign up
<<
Home , Wake Island

The administrative rules you are asserting today do not apply to me/us they apply to you. I appear under the laws of necessity. 1st I want to put on the record that the STATE OF LOYALTY OATH REQUIREMENTS FOR All Judges, Attorneys, Police Officers, Mayors, Governor, Attorney General; Officers of the Court, State & Employees as described in HB3254 – RELATING TO OATHS OF OFFICE1

https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2006/bills/HB3254_hd1_.htm#:~:text="I%2C....,or%20purpose% 20of%20evasion%3B%20and

SECTION 3. Section 128-16, Hawaii Revised Statutes, Status of personnel other than regular officers and employees.is amended to read as follows: All persons, including volunteers whose services

1 Vol01_Ch0001-0042F STATE OF HAWAII OATH OF OFFICE

Section 4. All eligible public officers, before entering upon the duties of their respective offices, shall take and subscribe to the following oath or affirmation: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the , and the Constitution of the State of Hawaii, and that I will faithfully discharge my duties as ...... to the best of my ability." As used in this section, "eligible public officers" means the governor, the lieutenant governor, the members of both houses of the legislature, the members of the board of education, the members of the national guard, State or county employees who possess police powers, district court judges, and all those whose appointment requires the consent of the senate. [Ren and am Const Con 1978 and election Nov 7, 1978; am SB 1440 (1992) and election Nov 3, 1992]

Attorney General Opinions

Elfbrandt v. Russell, 384 U.S. 11, 86 S. Ct. 1238, does not invalidate the oath of office. Att. Gen. Op. 66-18. When board of education members can assume official duties. Att. Gen. Op. 86-21. My Note to Self: this opinion only protects the innocent who are being prosecuted for guilt by association. One cannot be prosecuted for lawful behavior; only ‘unlawful’ behavior! ______

have been accepted by authorized persons, [shall,] while engaged in the performance of duty pursuant to this chapter, including duty performed during periods of training, shall be deemed state employees or employees of a political subdivision, as the case may be, and shall have the powers, duties, rights, and privileges of such in the performance of their duties, except as, pursuant to this chapter, may be prescribed by or under the authority of the governor or the political subdivision.

2nd Failure to uphold the Loyalty Those failing to uphold their Loyalty oath with wrong doings; may be held accountable under U.S. Title Code 18 sec. 241 CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS and 242 - DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW SEE Exhibit 1 I/We are prepared to protect our iwi by using all your administrative rules and US Federal Laws to Hold you to your oath and legal obligations that control your actions.

The primary laws to establish your jurisdiction is your STATE OF HAWAII CONSTITUION ART. 15 – Boundaries that do not include any of the ; specifically Maui in this instance. US Public Law 86-3, US ttitle code 28 sec. 91 which also do not include Maui or any other Hawaiian Islands. The question at hand; is the deprivation of my/our individual rights by those using STATE or COUNTY Administrative rules and Police and Military Protection outside its jurisdictional allowed in US Constitutional Laws and Rules? US Title Code 18 sec. 241 and 242 says; NO! Furthermore, on Dec. 10, 2020 the US Supreme Court Ruled that a Government Agent may be sued in their private capacity when they violate your individual rights. I am prepared to do whatever I need to, to protect our Kupuna IWI. U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously You May Sue Government Agents for Damages When They Violate Your Individual Rights - Institute for Justice

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19- 71/132799/20200212125602641_Brief%20of%20Amicus%20Curiae%20Institute%20for %20Justice.pdf

On July 9, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court made the opinion in McGirt v. , that where a U.S. Congress Treaty has been made, unless it is withdrawn/ cancelled/ void; it still stands. In Oklahoma where the U.S. Congress made a Treaty with the Creek Reservation for approx. 3 million acres of land on the Eastern side of Oklahoma, the US Supreme Court ruled the State of Oklahoma had no jurisdiction to prosecute the Petitioner for his criminal acts done on Creek Reservation land in Oklahoma State Law.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/09/us/supreme-court-oklahoma-mcgirt-creek-nation.html The primary impact of McGirt is that Oklahoma loses much of its power to enforce certain laws against members of Native American tribes within the borders of tribal lands. ... McGirt's crime took place within land that, according to Gorsuch's majority opinion, is part of the Creek Reservation.Jul 10, 2020

The Question at Hand is: Where is the land where the alleged Crime, Land Takings, Burial Obstruction happened? The STATE OF HAWAII is described in US Title Code 28, Sec 91 as: Hawaii constitutes one judicial district which includes the Midway Islands, Wake Island, Johnston Island, Sand Island, Kingman , Palmyra Island, , , , Canton Island, and Enderbury Island: Provided, That the inclusion of Canton and Enderbury Islands in such judicial district shall in no way be construed to be prejudicial to the claims of the to said Islands in accordance with the agreement of April 6, 1939, between the Governments of the United States and of the United Kingdom to set up a regime for their use in common. Court shall be held at . (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 877; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 64a, 63 Stat. 99;

U.S. public Law 86-3 which admitted Hawaii into the U.S. UNION describes Hawaii as:

· SEC. 2. The State of Hawaii shall consist of all the islands, together with their appurtenant reefs and territorial waters, included in the Territory o:f Hawaii on the date o:f enactment of this Act, except the known as Palmyra Island, together with its appurtenant reefs and territorial waters, but said State shall not be deemed to include the Midway Islands, Johnston Island, Sand Island ( offshore from Johnston Island), or , together with their appurtenant reefs and territorial waters.

STATE OF HAWAII Constitution Article XV- Boundaries The State of Hawaii shall consist of all the islands, together with their appurtenant reefs and territorial and archipelagic waters, included in the on the date of enactment of the Admission Act, except the atoll known as Palmyra Island, together with its appurtenant reefs and territorial waters; but this State shall not be deemed to include the Midway Islands, Johnston Island, Sand Island (offshore from Johnston Island) or Kingman Reef, together with their appurtenant reefs and territorial waters. All of these descriptions exclude any of the Hawaiian Islands found in the Hawaiian Island Archipelago Longitudes and Latitudes:

However, the 1849 (Ratified 1850) Treaty between the Republic of the united States of America (President Zachery Taylor) and the Hawaiian Island King (Kamehameha III), His heirs and His successors includes all the islands in the Hawaiian Islands Archipelago as described in:

Exhibit 1: US Title Code 18, Chapter 13, Vol. 12 pg. 84-85

SEE SECTIONS 241- CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS & 242- DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW

TITLE 28 SECTION 91- JURISDICTIONAL DESCRIPTION OF Hawaii (Does not include any of the Hawaiian Islands).

READ SEC 635, 636 OMITTED- THESE ITEMS WERE OMITTED IN VIEW OF Hawaii BEING ADMISSION OF Hawaii INTO the U.S. UNION- THIS MEANS THE Judicial HOLD ON THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS BY THE OF 1900 IS RELEASED. Google/Read SEC.635 & 636; 644a GIVES THE JURISDICTIONAL DISTRICT FOR THE COURTS, WHICH DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY OF THE INHABITED HAWAIIAN ISLANDS; Kauai, Niihau, Oahu, , Lanai, Maui, Kahoolawe, Hawaii Islands.