DOCSLIB.ORG

Midway Seabird Protection Project Draft Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Midway Seabird Protection Project Draft Environmental Assessment U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Midway Seabird Protection Project Draft Environmental Assessment Sand Island, Midway Atoll, Papaha-naumokua-kea Marine National Monument Front cover: A male albatross bonds with his chick Ku-kini, a Hawaiian word for messenger. The mother - an albatross named Wisdom who is the world’s oldest known wild bird - is off foraging at sea. In her lifetime, Wisdom has raised over 35 chicks. Credit: Kiah Walker/USFWS Volunteer MIDWAY SEABIRD PROTECTION PROJECT Draft Environmental Assessment Sand Island, Midway Atoll, Papahanaumokuakea- - Marine National Monument Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cooperating Agency USDA APHIS Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center Prepared by: Hamer Environmental L.P. and Planning Solutions, Inc. March 2018 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MIDWAY SEABIRD PROTECTION PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Midway Atoll National Wildlife Refuge (MANWR) lies in the North Pacific Ocean approximately equidistant between North America and Asia. The refuge is also designated the Battle of Midway National Memorial and is within the Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument. The fringing coral reef, shallow lagoons, and 3 low-lying islands (Sand, Eastern, and Spit Islands), are the breeding grounds for millions of seabirds, the wintering grounds for thousands of shorebirds, and a refuge for critically endangered species like the Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus schauinslandi) and Laysan duck (Anas laysanensis). Over 70% of the total global population of Laysan albatross (Phoebastria immutabilis) breeds at the refuge; with the majority of the Midway population nesting on the 1,128-acre Sand Island. This Environmental Assessment (EA) documents an action proposed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument (PMNM) and presents the anticipated environmental effects of both the Proposed Action and a No Action alternative. The Proposed Action is to eradicate house mice (Mus musculus) from Sand Island by delivering a lethal dose of rodenticide to every rodent in a manner that minimizes harm to island residents and the ecosystem while still maintaining a high probability of success, and to maintain the island in rodent-free status in perpetuity. The toxicant to be employed as part of the Proposed Action would be Brodifacoum-25D Conservation, a pelleted rodenticide bait intended for conservation purposes for the control or eradication of invasive rodents on islands or vessels. Implementation of the proposed action is currently being considered for Summer, 2019. This action was identified in the Papahānaumokuākea Monument Management Plan (PMMP), completed in December 2008, as Strategy AS-4 with a goal of developing an eradication plan within 5 years. The need for the action was reinforced when, in 2015, mice were confirmed to be feeding on the backs and necks of adult albatross nesting on Sand Island, leading to nest abandonment and mortality of adults, eggs and chicks. The Proposed Action was identified in the PMMP for many reasons, among them the fact that worldwide invasive species are a leading cause of island species extinctions including mammal, bird, reptile, and invertebrates. Forty to sixty % of all recorded bird and reptile extinctions are attributed to invasive rodents. The USFWS is proposing the Action to protect seabirds and their habitats on MANWR’s Sand Island. The other islands of MANWR, Eastern and Spit, are not included because mice are not currently present on them. The USFWS is planning and would conduct the Action with technical support from Island Conservation (IC) and the Midway Restoration Partnership Group, which is a multidisciplinary stakeholder body including representatives from USFWS, Island Conservation, American Bird Conservancy, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC), the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and the State of Hawaiʻi Office of Hawaiian Affairs. Removing mice would improve the MANWR’s ability to restore the natural island ecosystem, benefitting native coastal plants and insects. The proposed action would improve seabird nesting habitat and could aid in the recovery of rare seabirds such as the short-tailed albatross ES-1 MIDWAY SEABIRD PROTECTION PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Phoebastria albatrus), Bulwer’s petrel (Bulweria bulwerii), and Tristram’s storm-petrel (Oceanodroma tristrami). The proposed action involves the aerial broadcast of bait pellets containing rodenticide into all potential mouse territories on Sand Island along with supplemental hand broadcasting of bait in sensitive areas (e.g., narrow shorelines) and placing bait stations in commensal areas. The USFWS also considered other alternatives and methods to eradicate mice on Sand Island but these were dismissed from analysis since they failed to meet the purpose and need of the project. Mouse eradication would occur in the summer dry season to maximize the probability of success by targeting mice when their food resources are lowest and their abundance is declining. Conducting the operation during this period would also minimize the risk of rain washing rodenticide pellets into the ocean and is also a period of low winds, which makes bait application easier to control. It is also the time of year when relatively few wintering shorebirds, which may be susceptible to primary and secondary poisoning, are present; relatively few seabirds are also present at this time because the majority have completed breeding and have left the island. The lower numbers of seabirds present on MANWR at this time of year also reduces, but does not eliminate, the potential for collisions between operational aircraft and seabirds. The endangered Laysan duck, a year-round resident species, would be present at this time. Also, several species of water and land birds may be present during implementation. Protective measures would be implemented to avoid and minimize impacts to them. This EA evaluates the likelihood and magnitude of these incidental bird mortalities, and decribes the avoidance and minimization measures that will be implemented to reduce bird mortalities. This EA will also be used for consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and for consulting with NOAA related to Essential Fish Habitat. The USFWS is responsible for the final decision on the Action along with the plans for implementation and monitoring. The USFWS anticipates that the Proposed Action would have a less than significant adverse impact on the environment when it is conducted as outlined in this EA, including the implementation of the avoidance, minimization, and mitigation policies and actions. ES-2 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MIDWAY SEABIRD PROTECTION PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project: Midway Seabird Protection Project Agency: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 5-231 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96850 Submit Comments to: [email protected] Cooperating Agencies: USDA APHIS NWRC Affected Location: Sand Island, MANWR, Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Proposed Action: Eradication of invasive mice on Sand Island, MANWR via rodenticide. Island & Project Area: 1,128 acres (456.5 hectares) Required Permits & Approvals: • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Assessment • Section 7, Endangered Species Act (ESA) • Section 106, National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) • Essential Fish Habitat • Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Supplemental Label • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit • Marine National Monument Permit Anticipated Determination: No Significant Impacts Parties Consulted: See Chapter 7.0 Consultants: Hamer Environmental Planning Solutions, Inc. ES-3 MIDWAY SEABIRD PROTECTION PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ES-4 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MIDWAY SEABIRD PROTECTION PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND NEED .................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE ACTION ..................................................................................................................................1-2 1.3 NEED FOR THE ACTION ......................................................................................................................................1-3 1.3.1 Effects of Introduced Invasive Species on Islands .................................................................................1-3 1.3.2 Effects of Introduced mice on MANWR ................................................................................................1-4 1.3.3 MANWR Ecosystem Management and conservation plans ...................................................................1-6 1.3.3.1 Papahānaumokuākea Monument Management Plan (PMMP) .........................................................1-6 1.3.3.2 Conservation Action Plan for Black-footed albatross and Laysan albatross.....................................1-7 1.3.3.3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Regional Seabird Conservation Plan ...............................................1-7 1.4 REGULATORY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Leader Midway Atoll National Wildlife Refuge
    Project Leader Midway Atoll National Wildlife Refuge Location Midway Atoll National Wildlife Refuge and Battle of Midway National Memorial is located 1,300 miles from the main Hawaiian Islands and is part of the Northwestern Hawaiian Island chain. In addition to being a refuge and national memorial, Midway Atoll is also a part of Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument, one of the largest protected areas in the world. Midway Atoll is recognized as globally important for breeding albatross and other seabirds, and for its historic and cultural significance. It is also home to Henderson Field, an FAA emergency stop airport for transpacific flights. The island is inhabited year round by a population of ~50 residents that are a mix of FWS employees, volunteers, interns, and contractors of various nationalities. It is a tight, close-knit community where residents work, live, and spend down time together. Skills/Specialized Experience The Project Leader position at Midway Atoll NWR is one of the most unique and challenging refuge management positions in the refuge system. The ideal candidate would have experience working in remote locations, managing a large and diverse group of people, and possess an ability to maintain calm and steady leadership in the face of unexpected challenges. We are looking for a leader who will prioritize the safety, security and wellness of the island residents above all else. Other exciting challenges include complicated logistics as all supplies and personnel must be flown or shipped to the island, working with a variety of partners who rely on the island for staging (Coast Guard), monitoring (NOAA, DOD, etc...) and mission critical amenities (FAA and airport), and managing an airfield, a robust biological program, and the logistics of supporting a remote community.
    [Show full text]
  • Corinthian Yacht Club of Seattle Race Book
    R A C E B O O K 2 0 1 8 Sharing the Sailing Community More Jubilee – 2017 Boat of the Year Skipper: Erik Kristen Corinthian Yacht Club of Seattle Race Book 2018 Updated February 23, 2018 7755 Seaview Ave NW, Pier V Seattle, Washington 98117 www.cycseattle.org ⦁ 206.789.1919 ⦁ [email protected] Contents Let’s Go Sailing! .............................................................................................................................................. 1 About the Club ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Club Programs ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Racing Calendar ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Race Registration .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Entry Fees and Season’s Passes ............................................................................................................. 6 Lake Washington Racing ........................................................................................................................... 7 Last Season’s Regatta Winners ......................................................................................................... 7 Notice of Race Lake
    [Show full text]
  • OGC-98-5 U.S. Insular Areas: Application of the U.S. Constitution
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on GAO Resources, House of Representatives November 1997 U.S. INSULAR AREAS Application of the U.S. Constitution GAO/OGC-98-5 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of the General Counsel B-271897 November 7, 1997 The Honorable Don Young Chairman Committee on Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: More than 4 million U.S. citizens and nationals live in insular areas1 under the jurisdiction of the United States. The Territorial Clause of the Constitution authorizes the Congress to “make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property” of the United States.2 Relying on the Territorial Clause, the Congress has enacted legislation making some provisions of the Constitution explicitly applicable in the insular areas. In addition to this congressional action, courts from time to time have ruled on the application of constitutional provisions to one or more of the insular areas. You asked us to update our 1991 report to you on the applicability of provisions of the Constitution to five insular areas: Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (the CNMI), American Samoa, and Guam. You asked specifically about significant judicial and legislative developments concerning the political or tax status of these areas, as well as court decisions since our earlier report involving the applicability of constitutional provisions to these areas. We have included this information in appendix I. 1As we did in our 1991 report on this issue, Applicability of Relevant Provisions of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of <I>Leiolopisma</I> (Lacertilia: Scincidae) from Western
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Greer, Allen E., 1982. A new species of Leiolopisma (Lacertilia: Scincidae) from Western Australia. Records of the Australian Museum 34(12): 549–573. [31 December 1982]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.34.1982.242 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia A NEW SPECIES OF LElOLOPISMA (LACERTILlA: SCINClDAE) FROM WESTERN AUSTRALIA, WITH NOTES ON THE BIOLOGY AND RELATIONSHIPS OF OTHER AUSTRALIAN SPECIES ALLEN E. GREER The Australian Museum, Sydney SUMMARY Lei%pisma baudini n. sp. is described on the basis of a single specimen from the vicinity of Point Culver, Western Australia. The new species is quite distinct and relatively primitive. Its dosest living relative appears to be L. entrecasteauxij from southeastern Australia. Brief notes are provided on certain aspects of habitat, female reproduction and colour hues of most of the mainland Australian and Tasmanian species of Lei%pisma, and these data are used to support Rawlinson's (1974b and 1975) suggestion that the Australian species of the genus, at least, form two subgroups. A key is also provided to the described species of Lei%pisma from mainland Australia and Tasmania. INTRODUCTION During the course of a botanical survey in the area just west of Point Culver, Western Australia in October 1973, Mr Michael J. Brooker collected a number of reptiles which were subsequently lodged in the Western Australian Museum, Perth.
    [Show full text]
  • 93 REPTILES of the ALDERMEN ISLANDS By
    93 REPTILES OF THE ALDERMEN ISLANDS by D.R. Towns* and B.W. Haywardt SUMMARY Six species of reptile are recorded from the Aldermen Islands after a visit to all of the islands in the group in May, 1972. They are: the geckos Hoplodactylus pacificus and H, duvauceli; the skinks Leiolopisma oliveri, L. smithi and L. suteri, and the tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus. No reptiles were found on Middle, Half and Hernia Islands but they were abundant on the three largest rat-free islands (Ruamahua-iti, Ruamahua-nui and Hongiora). INTRODUCTION One of us (B.W.H.) collected and noted reptiles seen on the islands during a visit in May, 1972, whilst the senior author (D.R.T.) identified specimens and commented on their occurrence and taxonomy. The party was based on Ruamahua-iti (Fig. I.) and consequently the most detailed collection and observation was made on this island. Two day-trips were made to Middle Island, and one day visits to each of Hongiora, Ruamahua-nui, Half and Hernia Islands were also made. PREVIOUS WORK In 1843, Rev. Wade was shipwrecked on Ruamahua-iti. He commented on the "iguana-like lizards" (no doubt tuataras), and since then there has only been one published report of reptiles on these islands. This was included in a survey by Sladden and Falla (1928), who recorded a skink species {"Lygosoma Smithii"), geckos ("Dactylocnemis" sp.) and tuataras (Sphenodon punctatus). Over the past twenty-five years a number of parties of Internal Affairs Dept. Officers have visited the group and recorded tuataras seen, though no specific study of the reptiles has been attempted.
    [Show full text]
  • Phaeophyceae)
    Within-thallus variation on phlorotannin contents and physodes amount in Stypopodium zonale (Phaeophyceae) 1 1 GLAUCIA ANK ; WLADIMIR DA COSTA PARADAS ; GILBERTO MENEZES AMADO- 2 1 1* FILHO ; BERNARDO ANTÔNIO PEREZ DA GAMA & RENATO CRESPO PEREIRA . 1Universidade Federal Fluminense, Departamento de Biologia Marinha, Niterói, Brasil. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Diretoria de Pesquisas, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Abstract. Phlorotannins are defensive compounds produced by brown macroalgae and stored in vesicles called physodes. However, few studies have been performed to determine the relationship between the number of these cellular structures and the total amount of phlorotannins in different regions of the thalli of seaweeds. In order to verify this relationship, we quantified the number of physodes and the amount of phlorotannins in apical and basal portions of Stypopodium zonale thallus. The results showed that S. zonale apical regions exhibited significantly lower phlorotannin concentrations (0.49% DW + 0.04) than corresponding basal ones (0.78% DW + 0.21; p = 0.007). In addition, apical and basal regions of S. zonale also differed in the density of physodes, since apical fragments exhibited less physodes per cell (10.8 + 5.85) than basal fragments (42.73 + 16.16; p = 0.0035). Due to the defensive property of phlorotannins, a low amount of phlorotannins and physodes can become young or apical regions of S. zonale more susceptible to herbivory. Keywords: phlorotannins, physodes, tropical macroalga, Stypopodium zonale Resumo. Variação intra-talo da concentração de polifenóis e da quantidade de fisóides em Stypopodium zonale (Phaeophyceae). Florotaninos são conhecidos como substâncias defensivas produzidas por macroalgas pardas e armazenados em fisóides.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.9 Fish
    3.9 Fish MARIANA ISLANDS TRAINING AND TESTING FINAL EIS/OEIS MAY 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.9 FISH .................................................................................................................................. 3.9-1 3.9.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 3.9-2 3.9.1.1 Endangered Species Act Species ................................................................................................ 3.9-2 3.9.1.2 Taxonomic Groups ..................................................................................................................... 3.9-3 3.9.1.3 Federally Managed Species ....................................................................................................... 3.9-5 3.9.2 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................ 3.9-9 3.9.2.1 Hearing and Vocalization ......................................................................................................... 3.9-10 3.9.2.2 General Threats ....................................................................................................................... 3.9-12 3.9.2.3 Scalloped Hammerhead Shark (Sphyrna lewini) ...................................................................... 3.9-14 3.9.2.4 Jawless Fishes (Orders Myxiniformes and Petromyzontiformes) ............................................ 3.9-15 3.9.2.5 Sharks, Rays, and Chimaeras (Class Chondrichthyes)
    [Show full text]
  • A Non-Native Macroalga Is Less Attractive for Herbivores but More
    Ramalhosa et al. Helgol Mar Res (2016) 70:25 DOI 10.1186/s10152-016-0478-3 Helgoland Marine Research ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access A non‑native macroalga is less attractive for herbivores but more susceptible to light limitation and grazing stress than a comparable native species Patrício Ramalhosa1,2* , Sarah‑Lena Debus3,4, Manfred Kaufmann2,5,6 and Mark Lenz7 Abstract It has been suggested that non-native species are more tolerant towards abiotic stress than ecologically compara‑ ble native species. Furthermore, non-native marine macroalgae should be under lower grazing pressure than native seaweeds, because they left their co-evolved enemies behind. As a consequence, they generally need to allocate less energy to defences and can invest more into compensating the negative effects of abiotic stress or, assuming that grazing pressure is low but not zero, to defensive reactions following grazer attack. This, in turn, should make them more stress tolerant and less susceptible to herbivory. However, empirical evidence for both concepts is still scarce and very little is known about whether enemy release is commonly associated with an enhanced tolerance towards abiotic or biotic stress. We therefore ran an experimental study that (a) assessed attractiveness for grazers, (b) verified whether short-term low-light stress impairs growth and (c) investigated whether light limitation and previous grazing interactively affect the consumption of two macroalgae from Madeira Island, the native brown alga Stypopodium zonale and the non-native red alga Grateloupia imbricata by the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. To come to ecologi‑ cally meaningful low-light stress levels, pilot studies were performed in order to determine the light compensation point of photosynthesis for each algal species and then we established six light regimes around this point by reduc‑ ing the amount of incoming light.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an Assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde Biogeographic Marine Ecoregions
    Zootaxa 4413 (3): 401–448 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4413.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2DF9255A-7C42-42DA-9F48-2BAA6DCEED7E Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde biogeographic marine ecoregions JOSÉ A. GONZÁLEZ University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, i-UNAT, Campus de Tafira, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8584-6731. Abstract The complete list of Canarian marine decapods (last update by González & Quiles 2003, popular book) currently com- prises 374 species/subspecies, grouped in 198 genera and 82 families; whereas the Cape Verdean marine decapods (now fully listed for the first time) are represented by 343 species/subspecies with 201 genera and 80 families. Due to changing environmental conditions, in the last decades many subtropical/tropical taxa have reached the coasts of the Canary Islands. Comparing the carcinofaunal composition and their biogeographic components between the Canary and Cape Verde ar- chipelagos would aid in: validating the appropriateness in separating both archipelagos into different ecoregions (Spalding et al. 2007), and understanding faunal movements between areas of benthic habitat. The consistency of both ecoregions is here compared and validated by assembling their decapod crustacean checklists, analysing their taxa composition, gath- ering their bathymetric data, and comparing their biogeographic patterns. Four main evidences (i.e. different taxa; diver- gent taxa composition; different composition of biogeographic patterns; different endemicity rates) support that separation, especially in coastal benthic decapods; and these parametres combined would be used as a valuable tool at comparing biotas from oceanic archipelagos.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiribati Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity
    KIRIBATI FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Aranuka Island (Gilbert Group) Picture by: Raitiata Cati Prepared by: Environment and Conservation Division - MELAD 20 th September 2010 1 Contents Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: OVERVIEW OF BIODIVERSITY, STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS .................................................... 8 1.1 Geography and geological setting of Kiribati ......................................................................................... 8 1.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Status of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Soil ................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3.2 Water Resources ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rainfall and Flooding in Coastal Tourist Areas of the Canary Islands (Spain)
    atmosphere Article Rainfall and Flooding in Coastal Tourist Areas of the Canary Islands (Spain) Abel López Díez 1 , Pablo Máyer Suárez 2,*, Jaime Díaz Pacheco 1 and Pedro Dorta Antequera 1 1 University of La Laguna (ULL), 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; [email protected] (A.L.D.); [email protected] (J.D.P.); [email protected] (P.D.A.) 2 Physical Geography and Environment Group, Institute of Oceanography and Global Change (IOCAG), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), 35214 Telde, Gran Canaria, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 November 2019; Accepted: 11 December 2019; Published: 13 December 2019 Abstract: Coastal spaces exploited for tourism tend to be developed rapidly and with a desire to maximise profit, leading to diverse environmental problems, including flooding. As the origin of flood events is usually associated with intense precipitation episodes, this study considers the general rainfall characteristics of tourist resorts in two islands of the Canary Archipelago (Spain). Days of intense rainfall were determined using the 99th percentile (99p) of 8 daily precipitation data series. In addition, the weather types that generated these episodes were identified, the best-fitting distribution functions were determined to allow calculation of probable maximum daily precipitation for different return periods, and the territorial and economic consequences of flood events were analysed. The results show highly irregular rainfall, with 99p values ranging 50–80 mm. The weather types associated with 49 days of flooding events were predominantly cyclonic and hybrid cyclonic. The Log Pearson III distribution function best fitted the data series, with a strong likelihood in a 100-year return period of rainfall exceeding 100 mm in a 24 h period.
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape-Based Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability for All Native Hawaiian Plants
    Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDscape-bASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMatE CHANGE VULNEraBILITY FOR ALL NatIVE HAWAIIAN PLANts Lucas Fortini1,2, Jonathan Price3, James Jacobi2, Adam Vorsino4, Jeff Burgett1,4, Kevin Brinck5, Fred Amidon4, Steve Miller4, Sam `Ohukani`ohi`a Gon III6, Gregory Koob7, and Eben Paxton2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service —Ecological Services, Division of Climate Change and Strategic Habitat Management, Honolulu, HI 96850 5 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 6 The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i Chapter, Honolulu, HI 96817 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hawaii/Pacific Islands Area State Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 November 2013 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CAG09AC00070 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDSCAPE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY FOR ALL NATIVE HAWAIIAN PLANTS LUCAS FORTINI1,2, JONATHAN PRICE3, JAMES JACOBI2, ADAM VORSINO4, JEFF BURGETT1,4, KEVIN BRINCK5, FRED AMIDON4, STEVE MILLER4, SAM ʽOHUKANIʽOHIʽA GON III 6, GREGORY KOOB7, AND EBEN PAXTON2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaiʽi National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawaiʽi at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.
    [Show full text]