DOCSLIB.ORG

Gregory M. Reichberg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gregory M. Reichberg CURRICULUM VITAE (22 March 2017) Gregory M. Reichberg Work Address: Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) Hausmanns gate 3 PO Box 9229 Grønland NO-0134 Oslo, Norway Telephone: + 47 22 54 77 00 Mobile: +47 40 28 62 22 Fax: + 47 22 54 77 01 e-mail: [email protected]; web page: http://www.prio.no/page/Staff_detail//9375/37412.html. Current Appointments: Research Professor, Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), 2007– Professor (adjunct), Dept. of Political Science, University of Oslo, 2013– Head, Research School on Peace and Conflict (consortium of Ph.D. level courses), 2013– Previous Appointments: Director, PRIO Cyprus Center (Nicosia), 2009–2012. Adjunct Professor of Philosophical Ethics at MF – Norwegian School of Theology, 2007–10. Senior Researcher, Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), 1998–2007. Leader of PRIO’s Program on Ethics, Norms, and Identities, 2003–2009. Adjunct Professor, Australian National University, M.A. Program in International Relations, Oslo, 2005–8. Associate Professor of Philosophy, Fordham University, New York City, 1995– 99. Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Catholic University of America, Wash. D.C, 1990–1995. Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Political Science, University of Oslo, 1999–2001 Adjunct Professor, New York University, Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 1995. Lecturer, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, 1988-90 Areas of Specialization: Systematic, general: Political philosophy, philosophy of religion Systematic specific: Just war theory, military ethics, virtue theory Historical: Thomas Aquinas, the development of normative conceptions of war and peace in Western thought, Roman Catholic tradition, comparative religious approaches. 2 Education: Ph.D. in Philosophy, Emory University (Atlanta, Georgia), 1990. Maîtrise en philosophie, Université de Toulouse, 1984 Licence en philosophie, Université de Toulouse, 1982. Publications Monographs Thomas Aquinas on War and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Moral Choice in the Pursuit of Knowledge: Thomas Aquinas on the Ethics of Knowing (Ph.D. Dissertation). Ann Arbor: University Microfilms, 1991. Edited volumes Nuclear Deterrence: An Ethical Perspective (edited with Mathias Nebel). Geneva: Caritas in Veritate Foundation, 2015. Religion, War, and Ethics: A Sourcebook of Textual Traditions (edited with Henrik Syse and with the editorial assistance of Nicole Apostol). New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Cyprus Offshore Hydrocarbons: Regional Politics and Wealth Distribution (edited with Hubert Faustmann and Ayla Gürel). Nicosia: PRIO Cyprus Centre Report 1/2012. World Religions and Norms of War (edited with Vesselin Popovski and Nicholas Turner). Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2009. Ethics, Nationalism, and Just War: Medieval and Contemporary Perspectives (edited with Henrik Syse). Washington, D.C: Catholic University of America Press, 2007. The Ethics of War: Classic and Contemporary Readings (edited with Henrik Syse and Endre Begby). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. The Classics of Western Philosophy: A Reader’s Guide (edited with Jorge Gracia and Bernard Schumacher). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2003. Articles and book chapters “Charles Journet on the Impossibility of Christian Holy War,” Nova et Vetera (English edition), forthcoming, 2017. 2 3 “Thomas Aquinas on Battlefield Martyrdom,” in Chivalrous Combatants? The Meaning of Military Virtue Past and Present, Bernhard Koch, ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos, forthcoming 2017. “Thomas Aquinas,” in Just War Thinkers: From Cicero to the 21st Century, Daniel R. Brunstetter and Cian O’Driscoll, eds. New York: Routledge, forthcoming 2017. “Jacques Maritain – Christian Theorist of Non-violence and Just War,” Journal of Military Ethics, forthcoming 2017. “Historiography of Just War Theory,” in the Oxford Handbook of Ethics of War, Helen Frowe and Seth Lazar, eds. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), published online at www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199943418.001.0001/oxfordhb -9780199943418. Paper version forthcoming 2017. “The Morality of Nuclear Deterrence: A Reassessment,” in Mathias Nebel and Gregory M. Reichberg, eds. Nuclear Deterrence: An Ethical Perspective. Geneva: Caritas in Veritate Foundation, 2015. “Jacques Maritain, l’Espagne et la guerre sainte,” Revue thomiste 115.2 (2015): 215-233. “The Decision to Use Military Force in Classical Just War Thinking,” Ashgate Research Companion to Military Ethics, James Turner Johnson and Eric D. Patterson, eds. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2015, pp. 13-23. “Catholic Christianity: Historical Development,” in Religion, War, and Ethics: A Sourcebook of Textual Traditions (edited with Henrik Syse). New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. “The Moral Equality of Combatants – A Doctrine in Classical Just War Theory? Response to Graham Parsons,” Journal of Military Ethics, vol. 12, issue 2 (2013): 181– 194. Second response to Graham Parsons, Journal of Military Ethics, vol. 12, issue 4, (2013): 370-372. “Culpability and Punishment in Classical Theories of Just War,” in Just War: The State of the Art, A. F. Lang, Jr., C. O’Driscoll, and J. Williams, eds. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2013, pp. 157–180. “History of Just War Theory,” International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing, 2013, pp. 2863–2865. “Jacques Maritain,” in Key Theological Thinkers – from Modern to Postmodern, Ståle Johannes Kristiansen and Svein Rise, eds. Farnham (Surrey): Ashgate, 2013, pp. 657– 668. Norwegian version in Ståle Johannes Kristiansen and Svein Rise, eds, Moderne teologi: Tradisjon og nytenkning hos det 20. Århundrets teologer. Oslo: Høyskoleforlaget (Norwegian Academic Press), 2008, pp. 653–60. 3 4 “Legitimate Authority: Aquinas’s First Requirement of a Just War,” The Thomist, vol. 76, issue 3 (2012): 337-69. “Discontinuity in Catholic Just War? From Aquinas to the Contemporary Magisterium,” in Just War Symposium, a special section of Nova et Vetera (English Edition), vol. 10, issue 4, 2012, pp. 1073–97. “The Ethics of War. Part I: Historical Trends” (with Endre Begby and Henrik Syse), Philosophy Compass, vol. 7, issue 5, 2012, pp. 316–27. “The Ethics of War. Part II: Contemporary Authors and Issues” (with Endre Begby and Henrik Syse), Philosophy Compass, vol. 7, issue 5, 2012, pp. 328–47. “Suárez on Just War,” in Interpreting Suárez: Critical Essays, Daniel Schwartz, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 185–204. “Aquinas’ Moral Typology of Peace and War,” Review of Metaphysics, vol. 64, issue 3, 2011, pp. 467–87. “Thomas Aquinas on Military Prudence,” Journal of Military Ethics, vol. 9, issue 3, 2010, pp. 261-74. “Aquinas on Battlefield Courage,” The Thomist, vol. 74, issue 3, 2010, pp. 337-368. “Thomas Aquinas between Just War and Pacifism,” Journal of Religious Ethics, vol. 38, issue 2, 2010, pp. 219-41. “Norms of War in Cross-religious Perspective” (with Vesselin Popovski and Nicholas Turner), in World Religions and Norms of War, V. Popovski, G. M. Reichberg, and Nicholas Turner (eds). Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2009, pp. 303-15. “Norms of War in Roman Catholic Christianity,” in World Religions and Norms of War, Vesselin Popovski, Gregory M. Reichberg, and Nicholas Turner (eds). Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2009, pp. 142-65. “Just War and Regular War: Competing Paradigms,” in David Rodin and Henry Shue, (eds), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 193–213. “Jus ad Bellum,” in Larry May (ed.), War: Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp.11–29. “Preventive War in Classical Just War Theory,” Journal of the History of International Law, vol. 9, issue 1, 2007, pp. 5–33. Revised version (under the title “Forcible Preventive Disarmament in Traditional Just War Theory”) in Mary Ann Glendon, Russell Hittinger, and Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, The Global Quest for Tranquillitas Ordinis: Pacem in Terris, Fifty Years Later. Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, 2013), pp. 224–250. 4 5 “Aquinas on Defensive Killing: A Case of Double-Effect?” The Thomist, vol. 69, July 2005, pp. 341-370. German translation by Kathrin Staniul-Stucky und Werner Wolbert: “Thomas von Aquin zur Tötung aus Notwehr: Ein Fall von Doppelwirkung?,” in Adrian Holderegger and Werner Wolbert, eds., Deontologie – Teleologie. Die neuere Diskussion und ihre Relevanz für die theologische Ethik. Fribourg (Switzerland): Academic Press (Series: Studien zur theologischen Ethik), 2012, pp. 319–344. “ ‘Unterzeichnen Sie oder wir werden Sie bombardieren!’ Zur Ethik der Zwangsdiplomatie” [“ ‘Sign or We’ll Bomb!’ Ethics and Coercive Diplomacy”], in Jean- Christophe Merle, ed., Globale Gerechtigkeit–Global Justice. Stuttgart, Bad-Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2005, pp. 129–49. “The Idea of Double Effect – in War and Business,” (with Henrik Syse), Responsibility in World Business: Managing Harmful Side-Effects of Corporate Activity,” ed. by Lene Bomann-Larsen and Oddny Wiggen, Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2004, pp. 17–38. “Philosophy Meets War: Francisco de Vitoria’s De Indis and De jure belli relectiones (1557)” The Classics of Western Philosophy, J. Gracia, G. Reichberg, & B. Schumacher (eds). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2003, pp. 197–204. “Humanitarian Intervention: A Case of Offensive Force?” (with Henrik Syse). Security Dialogue, vol. 33/3 (2002), pp. 220–33. “Is there a ‘Presumption against War’ in Aquinas’s Ethics?” The Thomist, vol. 66, July 2002,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Business As an Instrument of Peace
    B U S I N E S S F O R P E A C E R E S E A R C H S Y M P O S I U M Business as an Instrument of Peace 2011 Business for Peace Research Symposium Oslo, October 17 Oslo House of Literature - Oslo Concert Hall - Oslo City Hall Presented by: In collaboration with: Folder2011_V6.indd 1 13.10.11 05.44 Business as an Instrument of Peace – 2011 Business for Peace Research Symposium Together with OECD National Contact Point During the 2011 Business for Peace Symposium, groundbreaking research will be presented providing Norway, the U.S. Institute of Peace, and the insights into how business and society best can work Peace Research Institute Oslo, a “Business together in order to create the essential shared values as an Instrument of Peace” research that help foster stability and peace, in national and international contexts. Not any kind of trade and symposium will be held on October 17. economics, nor any kind of business activity, may have The International Council of Swedish such a positive effect. Colonialism, factories abusing Industry and Institute of Corporate workforces, and cronyism, for example, may sow the seeds for frustration and violence. Underneath the Responsibility/GWU, will also join us to names and policies of “trade” are specific, concrete present new research in detail during interactions among parties that may or may not be the day at Oslo Konserthus. Highlights positive and constructive. An important aspect to consider is the nature of the interactions of particular from the findings will be showcased and businesses, particular business people, and particular challenged at a gathering in Oslo City Hall, stakeholders such as employees, shareholders, in connection with Oslo Innovation Week.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan F Qvigstad: on Transparency
    Jan F Qvigstad: On transparency Speech by Mr Jan F Qvigstad, Deputy Governor of Norges Bank (Central Bank of Norway), at Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi (The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters), Oslo, 10 November 2009. Ida Wolden Bache, Amund Holmsen, Marie Norum Lerbak and Øistein Røisland provided valuable assistance in preparing this speech * * * Introduction Norges Bank’s Executive Board has decided that the key policy rate now should be 1.5 per cent. If economic developments are broadly in line with projections, the appropriate key policy rate will be 2.75 per cent around the end of next year. If I had made this statement ten years ago, it would have constituted a breach of confidentiality.1 Norges Bank considered this to be highly sensitive information. Had I been deputy chairman of the US Federal Reserve Board twenty years ago, I would not even have been entitled to reveal the latest interest rate decision.2 Today, this sounds rather odd. Transparency is now taken for granted among central banks and in other areas of society. In London in 1780, the Bank of England was put to a test. In Parliament, Lord Gorden attempted to stop a bill to restore civil rights to Catholics.3 He drew support from large numbers. Rioting led to the destruction of several public buildings. When an attack was launched against the Bank of England, the building was secured like a fortress and withstood the onslaught, hence the phrase “as safe as the Bank of England”. Through the years, the phrase has been simplified into “as safe as the bank”.
    [Show full text]
  • Oslosenteret-Årsrapport-2012-2013.Pdf
    2012 - 2013 ANNUAL REPORT THE OSlo CENTER 2 CONTENTS NEW STEPS FORWARD PAGE 4 CONSOLIDATIONS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 5 STRATEGY PAGE 7 DEMOCRACY SUPPORT PAGE 9 Kenya PAGE 9 SOMALIA PAGE 11 SOUTH SUDAN PAGE 12 MONGOLIA, AFGHANISTAN AND CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PAGE 13 BURMA PAGE 15 RELIGION AND DEVELOPMENT PAGE 17 A UNIVERSAL CODE ON HOLY SITES PAGE 19 CHILD RIGHTS PAGE 20 FREEDOM OF RELIGION PAGE 22 OTHER ACTIVITIES PAGE 23 THE OSlo CENTER US FoundaTION PAGE 27 STAFF PAGE 28 Board OF DIRECTORS PAGE 30 Board OF TRUSTEES PAGE 31 INCOME AND EXPENDITURE PAGE 32 PARTNERS PAGE 33 FINANCIAL SUPPORTERS PAGE 34 3 NEW STEPS FORWARD 2012 has been a year for Norway and other countries – which was a huge strengthening and extending our inspiration for us. During the last year we have also program for democracy assist- had several meetings with representatives of the ance. Our goal is to assist emerg- Burmese government, and we are continuing our ing, vulnerable and fragile demo- dialogue for democracy and human rights in the cracies. Our efforts are directed country. towards legal frameworks for a functioning democracy, structures and working principles The Oslo Center will pursue activities within the field of political institutions, and to develop a mindset of human rights, but we will gradually try to integrate and political culture that supports democratic them more in our main program: democracy development. assistance. We will also continue our engagement on the project for a Universal Code on Holy Sites. The Oslo Center works in particular with political parties, governments, parliaments, election During autumn 2012 we started a process for a new commissions and young people from within civil strategy for the Oslo Center, which will be concluded society.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dignity Economy
    A Dignity Economy Creating an Economy that Serves Human Dignity and Preserves Our Planet Evelin Lindner MD, PhDs (Dr psychol, Dr med) [email protected] [email protected] 2012 Dignity Press vi A Dignity Economy Copyright © 2012 by Evelin Lindner. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- sa/3.0/. Please note: This license allows free use of the material with the restrictions that the author has to be mentioned as the originator and that works making use of it have to stay open under the same license. Published by World Dignity University Press, an imprint of Dignity Press 16 Northview Court Lake Oswego, OR 97035 USA www.dignitypress.org Visit the book’s website: www.dignitypress.org/dignity-economy Art direction and cover design by Uli Spalthoff. Cover photo (Farmer land rights protest in Jakarta, Indonesia) by Jonathan McIntosh (www.rebelliouspixels.com). Back cover photo ©Evelin Frerk 2011 (www.evelinfrerk.de). Printed on paper from environmentally managed forestry. See www.lightningsource.com/chainofcustody for certifications. ISBN 978-1-937570-03-3 This book is also available as eBook: eISBN 978-1-937570-04-0 Other Publications by Evelin Lindner Making Enemies: Humiliation and International Conflict (2006) Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, Greenwood Emotion and Conflict: How Human Rights Can Dignify Emotion and Help Us Wage Good Conflict (2009) Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, Greenwood Gender, Humiliation, and Global Security: Dignifying Relationships from Love, Sex, and Parenthood to World Affairs (2010) Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Security International, ABC-CLIO More publications on www.humiliationstudies.org/whoweare/evelin02.php viii A Dignity Economy Dedicated to my father, who, through his example, gave me the courage to stand up rather than stand by in the face of indignity.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent • International • Interdisciplinary Annual Report 2009
    T 20 09 R L REPO A ANNU Interdisciplinary • International International • Independent Independent Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW) Editor: Agnete Schjønsby In front of a church in Port-au- PO Box 9229 Grønland, NO-0134 Oslo, Norway Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO)7, Language Editor: Carville Language Services Prince, Haiti, 2009. Photo: Wenche Visiting Address: Hausmanns gate 7 PO Box 9229 Grønland, NO-0134 Oslo, Norway Design: Studio 7 www.studoisju.no Hauge, PRIO Visiting Address: Hausmanns gate 7 ISBN: 978-82-7288-345-3 Director’s Introduction P P RI Focus on Religion. Research on religion and its RI O For PRIO, 2009 was a year O A importance for peace has become increasingly A NNU of taking stock and looking central within PRIO’s research agenda over the past NNU few years. In this, we apply a range of methods, A A L including textual analysis, fieldwork and statistical L REPO forward. We celebrated REPO studies. Examining the promise – and limitations our 50th anniversary. We – of religious dialogue is particularly important now R R T 2009 that it is increasingly identified as a missing key T 2009 formulated a new strategy element in peacemaking diplomacy. Accordingly, in for 2010 to 2013. Once October 2009, PRIO and the Norwegian School of 2 Theology (MF) organized a conference on ‘Religious 01 again, our academic output Diversity in the Middle East: Building a Common Ground’, funded by the Norwegian Ministry of was tremendous. And we Foreign Affairs. Focused on religious education and family law, the event brought together academics continued to play a central from several Middle Eastern countries, Scandinavia, the UK and the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility and the Norwegian Leadership Model
    Corporate Social Responsibility and the Norwegian Leadership Model “Does the Norwegian leadership model harmonize with the ideal leadership in CSR?” Helene Terese Segrov Master´s thesis at the Faculty of Social Sciences THE UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Spring 2014 I II III Corporate Social Responsibility and the Norwegian Leadership Model “Does the Norwegian leadership model harmonize with the ideal leadership in CSR? And does the Norwegian tradition give the proper environment for Norwegian leaders to practice the ideal leadership in CSR?” IV Copyright Author 2014 Corporate Social Responsibility and the Norwegian Leadership model Helene Terese Segrov http://www.duo.uio.no Print: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo V VI Summary The thesis reviews the Norwegian leadership model and the institutional framework the model exists in. The model is defined through different approaches and characteristics where traits such as less authoritarian, informal and including are prescribed the Norwegian leaders together with the tendency of acting within the cooperation tradition, which is based on the Norwegian welfare state and tripartite collaboration. The Norwegian leadership model is further described through three different directions (cooperation tradition, organizational – and strategy theory), three different levels (the society, the working life and the company), through different dimensions (bureaucratic, communicative, management, and professional), and through different scholars of leadership that exists in Norway (sociotechnical, Norwegian business school, Solstrandprogrammet and the Kenning school). The overall institutional frames are the democratization, the history of the labor unions, the welfare state, the tripartite collaboration, and constituting laws and agreements in Norway. These can be illustrated through for instance the workers movement and the establishment of the basic agreement between LO and N.AF, democratic rights, direct agreement between the parties in the labor market, and the worker commission of 1885.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of War. Part I
    Philosophy Compass 7/5 (2012): 316–327, 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00458.x The Ethics of War. Part I: Historical Trends1 Endre Begby1*, Gregory Reichberg2* and Henrik Syse2* 1Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature (CSMN) 2Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) Abstract This article surveys the major historical developments in Western philosophical reflection on war. Section 2 outlines early development in Greek and Roman thought, up to and including Augustine. Section 3 details the systematization of Just War theory in Aquinas and his successors, especially Vitoria, Sua´rez, and Grotius. Section 4 examines the emergence of Perpetual Peace theory after Hobbes, focusing in particular on Rousseau and Kant. Finally, Section 5 outlines the central points of contention following the reemergence of Just War theory in the 1970s.2 1. Introduction War has been a constant in philosophical speculation from the Pre-Socratics to the present day. From Heraclitus onwards, many a philosopher has felt compelled to reflect on the origin, practice and consequences of war. It was not, however, until the medieval period that the problem of war (within and between nations) became the express theme of sys- tematic inquiry. Prior to that time, and apart from some rare exceptions (Thucydides being the most notable), war typically played a supporting role vis-a`-vis other more prominent issues. This is not to say that the Greek, Roman and early Christian treatments of war were superficial or lacking in analytic detail. On the contrary, the ancients raised penetrat- ing questions about war that would be taken up time and again in the centuries ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Foundation Annual Report 2015 (Pdf)
    The NOBEL- FOUNDATION Annual Report 2015 THE NOBEL FOUNDATION SWEDISH REGISTRATION NUMBER 802002-4462 ANNUAL REPORT 2015 The Nobel Foundation, Box 5232, se-102 45 Stockholm, Sweden © The Nobel Foundation, 2016. Nobel Prize®, The Nobel Prize® medal design mark and the N® design mark are registered trademarks of the Nobel Foundation. TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS, 2015........................4 Tasks and organisation ..................................................4 The Nobel Prize .......................................................6 The 2015 Nobel Laureates .......................................6 The Nobel Week in Stockholm ....................................7 The Nobel Days in Oslo .........................................7 Overall strategy for the Nobel sphere ...............................7 Lawsuit, Stockholm District Court .................................8 Legal action in California ........................................8 Lindau.......................................................8 Nobel Symposia ...............................................8 Financial management...................................................9 Organisation and strategy of asset management .......................9 Overall position and earnings ....................................10 Outflow and expenses ..........................................10 The investment portfolio ........................................12 Investments in equities .........................................12 Fixed income investments .......................................13
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Foundation Annual Report 2016 (Pdf)
    The NOBEL- FOUNDATION Annual Report 2016 THE NOBEL FOUNDATION SWEDISH REGISTRATION NUMBER 802002-4462 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 The Nobel Foundation, Box 5232, se-102 45 Stockholm, Sweden © The Nobel Foundation, 2017. Nobel Prize®, The Nobel Prize® medal design mark and the N® design mark are registered trademarks of the Nobel Foundation. TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS ............................4 Tasks and organisation ..................................................4 The Nobel Prize .......................................................6 The 2016 Nobel Laureates .......................................6 The Nobel Week in Stockholm ....................................7 The Nobel Days in Oslo .........................................7 Overall strategy for the Nobel sphere ...............................7 Ruling by the Svea Court of Appeal ................................8 Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings ..................................8 Nobel Symposia ...............................................9 Financial management..................................................10 Organisation and strategy of asset management ......................10 Overall position and earnings ....................................11 Outflow and expenses ..........................................11 The investment portfolio ........................................13 Investments in equities .........................................13 Fixed income investments .......................................14 Alternative investments .........................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Erik Grindheim Fra Folkerett Til Menneskerett?
    Internasjonal Politikk [1·o8] Internasjonal Politikk 1·o8 Internasjonal Politikk er det ledende skandinaviskspråklige fagtidsskrift innen Jan Erik Grindheim internasjonale studier, og et av de lengstlevende. Tidsskriftet har siden det ble Fra folkerett til menneskerett? startet av Norsk komité for internasjonale spørsmål i 1937, presentert artikler, EUs felles utenriks- og sikkerhetspolitikk kommentarer, debattinnlegg og anmeldelser med appell til akademia så vel som til praktikere og den interesserte allmennheten. Fokuset for publiserte artikler er derfor både teoretisk og empirisk. Internasjonal Politikk ønsker å Bjørn Olav Knutsen fremme både geografi sk og faglig pluralitet, og søker derfor artikler fra ulike NATOs rolle i kampen mot internasjonal terrorisme miljøer i Norden. Det langsiktige, overordnede faglige målet for Internasjonal Politikk er å opprettholde og videreutvikle den kreative spenningen som ligger i å kombinere det beste av faglig innsikt med målet om å opplyse og informere bredere lag av befolkningen. Tidsskriftet har siden 1960 blitt utgitt av Norsk Daniel Silander & Torgny Klasson Utenrikspolitisk Institutt (NUPI) og kommer ut fi re ganger i året. Mer om Hot- och motbilder i svensk säkerhetspolitik Internasjonal Politikk, samt retningslinjer for innsendte manus, fi nnes på www.nupi.no/ip. Fokus: Imperier Nina Græger, Iver B. Neumann, Torbjørn L. Knutsen, Helge Jordheim, Benjamin de Carvalho, Morten Skumsrud Andersen, Kristin M. Haugevik, Halvard Leira, Erlend Grøner Krogstad Årgang 66 ISSN 0020-577X r e d a k s j o n redaktører BenjaminBenjamin de Carvalho de Carvalho Halvard Halvard Leira Leira Retningslinjer for manus NUPINUPI [[email protected]] [[email protected]] NUPI [[email protected]][[email protected]] Artiklene bør ikke overskride 25 sider A 4, dobbel linjeavstand, eller 45 000 tegn inkludert bokredaktør mellomrom.
    [Show full text]
  • Høgres Syn På Statleg Eigarskap I Norsk Oljeverksemd 1970–1984
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Høgres syn på statleg eigarskap i norsk oljeverksemd 1970–1984 Håvard Brede Aven Masteroppgåve i historie Institutt for arkeologi, konservering og historie UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Våren 2014 II Høgres syn på statleg eigarskap i norsk oljeverksemd 1970–1984 III © Håvard Brede Aven 2014 Høgres syn på statleg eigarskap i norsk oljeverksemd 1970–1984 Håvard Brede Aven http://www.duo.uio.no/ Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo IV Samandrag Denne masteroppgåva handlar om Høgre sitt syn på statleg eigarskap i norsk oljeverksemd i perioden 1970 til 1984, frå dei første drivverdige oljefelta blei funne på norsk sokkel og fram til Willoch-regjeringa gjennomførte Statoil-reforma i 1984. Høgre var i utgangspunktet skeptisk til statsdrift og utstrakt statleg eigarskap i industribedrifter. Likevel var det den borgarlege Borten-regjeringa – med ein industriminister frå Høgre – som sikra statleg aksjemajoritet i Norsk Hydro i 1970 og 1971, etter at selskapet hadde begynt å involvere seg i oljeverksemd. I 1972 røysta alle Høgres stortingsrepresentantar også for opprettinga av eit reint statleg oljeselskap. I åra som følgde kritiserte Høgre både omfanget og formene for statleg deltaking i oljeverksemda: Etableringa av Statoil som eit operativt oljeselskap, Statoils og statens engasjement nedstrøms, og det partiet oppfatta som samanblanding av forvaltning og forretning – og dermed maktkonsentrasjon – i Statoil. Men trass i nokså krass polemikk om den statlege eigarskapen, særleg frå midten av 1970-talet, gjekk ikkje Høgre inn for nedsal i Hydro eller noko form for privatisering av Statoil.
    [Show full text]
  • Høgres Syn På Statleg Eigarskap I Norsk Oljeverksemd 1970–1984
    Høgres syn på statleg eigarskap i norsk oljeverksemd 1970–1984 Håvard Brede Aven Masteroppgåve i historie Institutt for arkeologi, konservering og historie UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Våren 2014 II Høgres syn på statleg eigarskap i norsk oljeverksemd 1970–1984 III © Håvard Brede Aven 2014 Høgres syn på statleg eigarskap i norsk oljeverksemd 1970–1984 Håvard Brede Aven http://www.duo.uio.no/ Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo IV Samandrag Denne masteroppgåva handlar om Høgre sitt syn på statleg eigarskap i norsk oljeverksemd i perioden 1970 til 1984, frå dei første drivverdige oljefelta blei funne på norsk sokkel og fram til Willoch-regjeringa gjennomførte Statoil-reforma i 1984. Høgre var i utgangspunktet skeptisk til statsdrift og utstrakt statleg eigarskap i industribedrifter. Likevel var det den borgarlege Borten-regjeringa – med ein industriminister frå Høgre – som sikra statleg aksjemajoritet i Norsk Hydro i 1970 og 1971, etter at selskapet hadde begynt å involvere seg i oljeverksemd. I 1972 røysta alle Høgres stortingsrepresentantar også for opprettinga av eit reint statleg oljeselskap. I åra som følgde kritiserte Høgre både omfanget og formene for statleg deltaking i oljeverksemda: Etableringa av Statoil som eit operativt oljeselskap, Statoils og statens engasjement nedstrøms, og det partiet oppfatta som samanblanding av forvaltning og forretning – og dermed maktkonsentrasjon – i Statoil. Men trass i nokså krass polemikk om den statlege eigarskapen, særleg frå midten av 1970-talet, gjekk ikkje Høgre inn for nedsal i Hydro eller noko form for privatisering av Statoil. Eit hovudspørsmål i oppgåva er kvifor Høgre gjekk inn for å etablere og vidareføre den statlege eigarskapen i dei to selskapa i perioden.
    [Show full text]