Friends and Friendships in Iranian Society: Human and Immortal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Friends and Friendships in Iranian Society: Human and Immortal Iranica Antiqua, vol. XLVI, 2011 doi: 10.2143/IA.46.0.2084422 FRIENDS AND FRIENDSHIPS IN IRANIAN SOCIETY: HUMAN AND IMMORTAL BY Jamsheed K. CHOKSY (Indiana University) Abstract: Constructs, permutations, functions, and bases of friends and friend- ships in society and sociopolitical hierarchies are analyzed within the context of religiosity in Iran and Iranian regions of Central Asia. Keywords: Friendship, society, knowledge, wisdom, religion, ritual, art, Iran, Central Asia, Zoroastrianism, Manicheism, Islam, Persians, Medes, Scythians, Achaemenians, Sasanians Clearchus the Spartan general, governor, tyrant, and mercenary leader of the Peloponnesian delegation in the Army of the Ten Thousand serving the Achaemenian or Persian prince Cyrus the Younger declared, during the march to Cunaxa on the east bank of the Euphrates river northwest of Babylon, in 401 BCE: “Never shall any man say that I, after leading Greeks into the land of the Barbarians, betrayed the Greeks and chose the friend- ship of the Barbarians” (Xenophon, Anabasis 1.3.5). The essentiality of making friends and maintaining friendships is regarded as an implicit aspect of life in diverse societies separated by geography, chronology, and culture. Iranians utilize many terms for friends and friendship of which mihr (mehr), erman (erman), ayar (yar), dost (dust), and mihrih (mehri), ermanih (ermani), ayarih (yari), dostih (dusti), in Middle Persian or Pahlavi (and New Persian or Farsi), respectively, are among the most important for those words bridging both Zoroastrian and Muslim societies. An existential question each person was expected to ask, according to ancient Iranian sages whose words were rendered into Middle Persian writing by an anon- ymous ninth-century CE Zoroastrian magus or priest, was: U-m ke dost? “And who is my friend?” (Cidag Handarz i Poryotkesan or Select Counsels of the Ancient Sages 1). One response, in the form of Pahlavi handarz/ andarz or “advice, wise sayings” codified during the ninth century CE but IA46011.pdf 1 24/06/11 11:31 94066_Iran_Antiqua_46_11.indd 251 21/06/11 12:34 252 J.K. CHOKSY attributed to the fourth-century CE chief magus Adurbad the son of Maraspand, extols: drost (i) kahwan owon homanag ciyon may (i) kahwan, ka harw cand kahwantar pad xwarisn i sahryaran wes weh ud sazagtar sayed “An old friend is like old wine, which becomes better and more appropriate for drinking by rulers the more aged it is” (handarz or “advice” in the Pahlavi Texts 1.101). Another response to that question was: pad xwesih i Ohrmazd ud Amahraspandan dastan “Maintain amity with Ahura Mazda (the Wise Lord) and the Am¢+a Sp¢∞tas (Holy Immortals)” (Cidag Handarz i Poryotkesan 3). Yet the basic question remains as to why friends and friendships were, as they still are, so vital for human existence? Moreover, how did individuals in Iran and Central Asia during ancient and medieval times establish, value, and make the most of actual friendships with others humans and symbolical friendships with divine beings? Clearchus’ words from the fifth century BCE plus those attributed to Adurbad and to anonymous magian sages approximately twelve centuries later serve as apt introductory anecdotes for the investigation of notions of friendship among the Barbarians, a Greek slur for Iranians, because those sayings highlight the possibility of choices and the consequence of choices. Configuring Both the Corporeal and Spiritual Worlds Perhaps the issues can be approached by examining, first, how the notion of friends and friendship is acquired. Advice from the priestly author of the Cidag Handarz i Poryotkesan may prove instructive: Pad frahang xwastarih tuxsag bawed, ce frahang toxm i danisn u-s bar xrad, ud xrad har do axwanig rayenisn “Be diligent in the acquisition of learn- ing, for learning is the basis of knowledge and its product is wisdom, and wisdom determines the configuration of both worlds” (42). Educating oneself with the correct knowledge that provided the wisdom essential for discerning judiciously between a+a/arta (Avestan/Old Persian; Middle Persian arda) or “order” on the one hand and drug/drauga (Middle Persian drug, druj, druz, droz, New Persian doruq) or “confusion” on the other hand was, as is known, integral to Iranian socioreligiosity. Yet it also determined each person’s material deeds which, in turn, were believed to shaped interpersonal relations, connections within corporeal societies, and conjunctions with spiritual beings. Essentially, the furtherance of a+a/arta involved facilitation and regulation of friendships that were IA46011.pdf 2 24/06/11 11:31 94066_Iran_Antiqua_46_11.indd 252 21/06/11 12:34 FRIENDS AND FRIENDSHIPS IN IRANIAN SOCIETY:HUMAN AND IMMORTAL 253 expected to paywand or “connect” all facets of orderly existence together through life, individual apocalypse, and collective eschatology to the final afterlife. One way in which a bond (mihr, mehr) and connection (paywandih, paywandi) between friends arose, became systematic, and remained firm seems to have been through learning about orderly conduct via scripture, advice, example, and behavior. The fundamental importance in Iranian society of humata (humat) or “good thoughts” for generating huxta (huxt) or “good words” and rendering them into huuarsta (huwarst) or “good deeds” to sustain fraternity and order had been emphasized to his friends and followers by the ancient poet and spiritual leader Zarathushtra (Zardosht, Zoroaster) in his Gaqas or Devotional Songs of the Avesta: A† ta vaxsiia is¢∞to ya mazdaqa hiia†ci† viduse, staotaca ahurai yesniiaca va∞h¢us mana∞ho, hum∏zdra a+a.yeca ya raoc≠bis dar¢sata uruuaza. Sraota.g≠us.ais vahista auuaenata suca mana∞ha, auuar¢nÇ viciqahiia nar≠m.nar¢m xvahiiai tanuiie, para maz≠ yÇ∞ho ahmai n≠ sazdiiai baod¢∞to paiti. A† ta mainiiu pouruiie ya y≠ma xvaf¢na asruuat¢m, manahica vacahica /iiaoqanoi hi vahiio ak¢mca, Çsca hudÇ∞ho ¢r¢s vi/iiata noi† duzdÇ∞ho. A†ca hiia† ta h≠m mainiiu jasaet¢m paouruuim dazde, gaemca ajiiatimca yaqaca a∞ha† ap≠m¢m a∞hus, acisto dr¢guuat∏m a† a+aune vahist¢m mano. AiiÇ mainiuuÇ varata y≠ dr¢guuÇ acista v¢r¢ziio, a+¢m mainiius sp≠nisto y≠ xraozdist≠∞g as≠no vaste, yaeca xsnaos≠n ahur≠m haiqiiais /iiaoqanais fraor¢† mazd∏m. AiiÇ noit ¢r¢s vi/iiata daeuuacina hiia† is a d¢baoma, p¢r¢sman≠∞g upa.jasa† hiia† v¢r¢nata acist¢m mano, a† aes¢m¢m h≠∞duuar¢∞ta ya b∏naii¢n ahum mar¢tano. O persons who seek, now I shall speak of praise for the Ahura (or Lord) and worship-worthy good thought, (words) to which even the learned should pay attention. O attentive persons, (I also shall speak) of order, the bliss of which can be gleaned through illumination. Listen, with your ears, to the best words. Contemplate through illumina- tion, each person individually with your mind, the consequences of dis- cernment. (Do so) before the great gathering, in anticipation of it being declared to us. IA46011.pdf 3 24/06/11 11:31 94066_Iran_Antiqua_46_11.indd 253 21/06/11 12:34 254 J.K. CHOKSY These two spirits, who are the original twins, revealed their distinc- tion in a vision. They are the better one and the worse one in thought, word, and deed. Between these two the judicious discern appropriately, not so the confused. When these two spirits come together, from the beginning they create existence and nonexistence. So, at the end, there will be the worst existence for followers of confusion but the best dwelling place for followers of order. Of these two spirits, the confused one chooses to do the worst things (while) the holiest spirit who is clothed in the hardest stones chooses order (as do those persons) who satisfy Mazda (or Wise/Wisdom) the Ahura through good deeds. The demons cannot discern appropriately between these two spirits for, as they deliberate, delusion comes upon them resulting in their choos- ing the worst thought. Then they scurry together with acrimony (Avestan aesma, Pahlavi xesm, Farsi kheshm < Indo-Euopean *ak- “acrimony,” as in Latin acer, “bitter, sharp;” probably comparable to Old Persian arika- “irksome;” rather than the traditional translations as “anger, delusion, wrath;” on *ak- see Watkins 2000: 2) through which mortal existence is afflicted. (Yasna or Sacrifice, Worship 30.1–6) Acquisition of learning, knowledge, and wisdom cannot occur without societal and confessional frameworks nor without the amity that permits sharing of ideas and institutions (cross-culturally consult Benedict 1934/1959: 35–38, 47–48, 251–254; Brown and Duguid 2000: 117–140) — as Zara- thushtra’s words suggested. So free-willed alliance can be understood broadly as the foundation of Iranian civitas in ancient and medieval times amidst Zoroastrians, Manicheans, and Muslims even though intercommunal rela- tions periodically were strained and even hostile. Friendships and other rela- tionships formed in this world were and still are important means of con- structing and maintaining the societal fabric (compare generally Tylor 1958/1970: 26–69). Assistance supposedly earned from beneficent divine entities or immortal spirits was and is another factor with the same goals. Together, such human and immortal friends seem to have provided individuals with the means to fulfill obligations by acquiring and utilizing the learning, knowledge, and wisdom necessary to maintain the order that was essential for universal wellbeing. It is instructive, therefore, to examine some of the frameworks of friendship and facets of archetypical friends. IA46011.pdf 4 24/06/11 11:31 94066_Iran_Antiqua_46_11.indd 254 21/06/11 12:34 FRIENDS AND FRIENDSHIPS IN IRANIAN SOCIETY:HUMAN AND IMMORTAL 255 Human Friends According to evidence in the Avesta (Abestag) or Praise, the social and confessional frameworks of Proto-Iranians and the earliest Iranians included two hierarchical series or systems of patriarchal organization (Geiger 1882: especially 425–443; more recently followed by Schwartz 1985: 649–650).
Recommended publications
  • Nnnnãvr-N Paznû
    THE MANUSCRTpTs or ð¿Nen ¿NenÃðn-N,iua n¡vn ;n¿j vt-vI nà r-NÃtw ø BY zARToSr-n nnnnÃvr-n paZnû Olga Yastrebova Zarto$t-e Bahrãm was a Zoroastrian poet who lived in Iran in the late 13th century. He is one of the few Zoroastrian authors who wrote in Persian and whose name and scraps of biographical information have been preserved to our days. The most significant and well known of his works are Ardãya-Wrãf-nãmet, ëangranghãðe' nãme2, andQesse-ye 'lJmar Xattãb va iãhzdde'ye irãn-zamr-n3, a collection of parables on the perishable nature of this world.a All of them were written in hazaj- e mosaddas metre. For several centuries tradition ascribed to him the authorship of Zarto!çnãme (onginally Mowlûd-Zartoflt)s, but as Ch. Rempis and R. Ahfi showed in their studies published independently in 1963 and 1964, the real author was another Zoroastrian, named Kay-Kâüs b. Kay-Xosrow b. Dãrã, from the city of Ray.6 The episode of Zaratustra's biography which is the subject of Õangranghãëe- nãme, is nol found in any other source except this poem. After Zaratu$tra's religion had been successfully disseminated in the kingdom of Go5tasp, the news reached the Indian sage Õangranghãðe. This wise man is said to have been one of the teachers of GoStasp's famous counsellor Jãmãsp. ðangranghaðe summoned Zarto5t to take part in a dispute, and spent two years preparing for it. He devoted all his time to gathering difficult questions and riddles. After the long period of I Text published twice: Jamasp Asa 1902; Afift 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • L2/20-246 Teeth and Bellies: a Proposed Model for Encoding Book Pahlavi
    L2/20-246 Teeth and bellies: a proposed model for encoding Book Pahlavi Roozbeh Pournader (WhatsApp) September 7, 2020 Background In Everson 2002, a proposal was made to encode a unified Avestan and Pahlavi script in the Unicode Standard. The proposal went through several iterations, eventually leading to a separate encoding of Avestan as proposed by Everson and Pournader 2007a, in which Pahlavi was considered non-unifiable with Avestan due to its cursive joining property. The non-cursive Inscriptional Pahlavi (Everson and Pournader 2007b) and the cursive Psalter Pahlavi (Everson and Pournader 2011) were later encoded too. But Book Pahlavi, despite several attempts (see the Book Pahlavi Topical Document list at https://unicode.org/L2/ topical/bookpahlavi/), remains unencoded. Everson 2002 is peculiar among earlier proposals by proposing six Pahlavi archigraphemes, including an ear, an elbow, and a belly. I remember from conversations with Michael Everson that he intended these to be used for cases when a scribe was just copying some text without understanding the underlying letters, considering the complexity of the script and the loss of some of its nuances to later scribes. They could also be used when modern scholars wanted to represent a manuscript as written, without needing to over-analyze potentially controversial readings. Meyers 2014 takes such a graphical model to an extreme, trying to encode pieces of the writing system, most of which have some correspondence to letters, but with occasional partial letters (e.g. PARTIAL SHIN and FINAL SADHE-PARTIAL PE). Unfortunately, their proposal rejects joining properties for Book Pahlavi and insists that “[t]he joining behaviour of the final stems of the characters in Book Pahlavi is more similar to cursive variants of Latin than to Arabic”.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Good Faith
    On the Good Faith Zoroastrianism is ascribed to the teachings of the legendary prophet Zarathustra and originated in ancient times. It was developed within the area populated by the Iranian peoples, and following the Arab conquest, it formed into a diaspora. In modern Russia it has evolved since the end of the Soviet era. It has become an attractive object of cultural produc- tion due to its association with Oriental philosophies and religions and its rearticulation since the modern era in Europe. The lasting appeal of Zoroastrianism evidenced by centuries of book pub- lishing in Russia was enlivened in the 1990s. A new, religious, and even occult dimension was introduced with the appearance of neo-Zoroastrian groups with their own publications and online websites (dedicated to Zoroastrianism). This study focuses on the intersectional relationships and topical analysis of different Zoroastrian themes in modern Russia. On the Good Faith A Fourfold Discursive Construction of Zoroastrianism in Contemporary Russia Anna Tessmann Anna Tessmann Södertörns högskola SE-141 89 Huddinge [email protected] www.sh.se/publications On the Good Faith A Fourfold Discursive Construction of Zoroastrianism in Contemporary Russia Anna Tessmann Södertörns högskola 2012 Södertörns högskola SE-141 89 Huddinge www.sh.se/publications Cover Image: Anna Tessmann Cover Design: Jonathan Robson Layout: Jonathan Robson & Per Lindblom Printed by E-print, Stockholm 2012 Södertörn Doctoral Dissertations 68 ISSN 1652-7399 ISBN 978-91-86069-50-6 Avhandlingar utgivna vid
    [Show full text]
  • Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nineteenth-Century Iran
    publications on the near east publications on the near east Poetry’s Voice, Society’s Song: Ottoman Lyric The Transformation of Islamic Art during Poetry by Walter G. Andrews the Sunni Revival by Yasser Tabbaa The Remaking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Shiraz in the Age of Hafez: The Glory of Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century a Medieval Persian City by John Limbert by Zeynep Çelik The Martyrs of Karbala: Shi‘i Symbols The Tragedy of Sohráb and Rostám from and Rituals in Modern Iran the Persian National Epic, the Shahname by Kamran Scot Aghaie of Abol-Qasem Ferdowsi, translated by Ottoman Lyric Poetry: An Anthology, Jerome W. Clinton Expanded Edition, edited and translated The Jews in Modern Egypt, 1914–1952 by Walter G. Andrews, Najaat Black, and by Gudrun Krämer Mehmet Kalpaklı Izmir and the Levantine World, 1550–1650 Party Building in the Modern Middle East: by Daniel Goffman The Origins of Competitive and Coercive Rule by Michele Penner Angrist Medieval Agriculture and Islamic Science: The Almanac of a Yemeni Sultan Everyday Life and Consumer Culture by Daniel Martin Varisco in Eighteenth-Century Damascus by James Grehan Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey, edited by Sibel Bozdog˘an and The City’s Pleasures: Istanbul in the Eigh- Res¸at Kasaba teenth Century by Shirine Hamadeh Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle Reading Orientalism: Said and the Unsaid East by Ehud R. Toledano by Daniel Martin Varisco Britons in the Ottoman Empire, 1642–1660 The Merchant Houses of Mocha: Trade by Daniel Goffman and Architecture in an Indian Ocean Port by Nancy Um Popular Preaching and Religious Authority in the Medieval Islamic Near East Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nine- by Jonathan P.
    [Show full text]
  • Mithra and the Imperial Power of Rome. Prof
    XTbe ©pen Court A MONTHLY MAGAZINE S)evote& to tbe Science ot 'KeUaton, tbe IReltglon ot Science, anb tbe Extension ot tbe IReligious parliament IfDea Editor: Dr. Paul Carus. ^' ^' Hegeler. Assoc'ates-\^ Assistant Editor: T. J. McCormack. ' \ Mary Carus. VOL. XVI. (no. 8) August, 1902. NO. 555 CONTENTS: Frontispiece. Reverse of the Grand Mithraic Bas-Relief, of Heddernheim, Germany. Mithra and the Imperial Power of Rome. Prof. Franz Cumont, Ghent, Belgium 449 Hiawatha atid the Onondaga Indians. An Investigation of the Great Indian Myth and the Version of the Story as Told by Chief Daniel La Fort. Dr. Charles L. Henning 459 The Apostate of the Talmud. Rabbi Bernard M. Kaplan, M. A. Sacra- mento, Cal 467 Jesus in the Talmud. Albert J. Edmunds, Philadelphia, Penn 475 The Wheel and the Cross. Summary of the History of Sun-Wheels and the Worship of Sun-Gods. Illustrated. Editor . 478 Amiidbha. A Story of Buddhist Metaphysics. (Continued.) Editor . 486 The Story of Chivalry 506 Book Reviews and Notes 507 CHICAGO X^be 0pen (Touct Il>ubli8blnd Companig LONDON : Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd. Per copy, 10 cents (sixpence). Yearly, $1.00 (In the U. P. U., 5s. 6d.). Copyright, 1902, by The Open Court Publishing Co. Entered at the Chicago Post Office as Second-Class Matter. ^be ©pen Court A MONTHLY MAGAZINE Bevoteb to tbe Science ot "KeUoion, tbe IReli^ton ot Science, an^ tbe JExtension ot tbe IRellaious parliament IFDea Editor: Dr. Paul Carus. , ( E. C. Hegeler. Associates. -^ Assistant Editor: T. J. McCormack. y^^^^ Carus. VOL. XVI. (no. 8) August, 1902.
    [Show full text]
  • Sekandar Amanolahi Curriculum Vitae
    Sekandar Amanolahi Curriculum Vitae Occupation: Professor of Anthropology E-mail: [email protected]; amanolahi @yahoo.com Phone: 89-7136242180, 617-866-9046 Education: A.A., University of Baltimore, 1964 B.A., Sociology, Morgan State University, 1968 M.A., Anthropology, University of Maryland, 1971 Ph.D., Anthropology, Rice University 1974 Scholarships and Research Grants: University of Maryland, scholarship, 1968-70 Rice University, scholarship, 1971-73 National Science Foundation (through Rice University), Research Grant, 1973 Shiraz University (formerly Pahlavi), scholarship, 1974 Shiraz University, Research Grant, 1976-77 Shiraz University, Research Grant, 1978-80 Harvard University, Fellowship, 1984-85 Namazi Foundation, 1984-85 Harvard University, Grant, summer 1988 National Endowment for Humanities Collaborative Grant, 1990-91 Aarhus University (Denmark) Research Foundation, summer 1991 Bergen University, Council for International Cooperation and Development Studies (Norway) 1991-92 Cultural Heritage Foundation (Center for Anthropological Studies), Research Grant, 1996-97 Shiraz University, Research Grant, 1996-97 Shiraz Municipality, Research Grant, 1997-98 Daito Bunka University (Japan) Fellowship, Summer 1999 UNFPA, Research Grant, University of London, Summer 2004. Fields of Special Interest Culture Change, Ethnic Relations, Tribes Pastoral Nomadism, Peasants, Gypsies, Urbanization, Migration, Globalization Courses Taught: Sociocultural Anthropology, Ethnological Theory, Nomadism, Social History of Iran, Kinship and Family, Rural Sociology, Peoples and Cultures of the Middle East, Introductory Physical Anthropology. Publications: 1970 The Baharvand: Former Pastoralist of Iran, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology. Rice University. 1974 "The Luti, an Outcast Group of Iran," Rice University Studies, Vol. 61, Mo.2, pp. 1-12 1975 Social Status of Women among the Qashqai (in Persian) Tehran: Women Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Alphabetic Order Q Follows A, a Follows E, C Follows C, 1J Follows N, S Follows S, I Follows Z
    INDEX [In the alphabetic order q follows a, a follows e, c follows c, 1J follows n, s follows s, i follows z. In arranging words no distinction has been made between long and short vowels. Pahlavi anrllater forms are generally given in square brackets after the Avestan ones, ancl are entered separately only when there is a significant difference between the two.l Aban see Apas 273· A ban Niyayes 52; 271-2. Airyaman 56-7; his part at Fraso.kar<Jti, Aban Yast 73· 57. 242, 291. abstract divinities 23-4; 58, 59; 203. Airyanam Vaejah [f:ranve)] 144-5; 274- Aditi 55· S· Adityas 55; 83. Airyama isyo 56; 261; 263; 265. Adurbad i Mahraspandan 35; 288. Aiwisriithra [Aiwisriithrim] the 4th watch Aesma demon of Wrath, 87; companion ( giih) of the 24-hour day, from sunset till of the daevas, 201; flees at the last day midnight, 124; under the guardianship of before the Saosyant, 283; the Arabs are the fravasis, 124, 259. of his seed, 288. Aka Manah 283. aethrapati [erbad, herbad] 12. Akhtya 161. Afrasiyab see FralJrasyan *Ala demon of purpureal fever, 87 n. 20. afrinagan an "outer" religious ceremony, Amahraspand see Amasa Spanta 168; legends connected with the offerings Amestris xog; 112. made at it, 281. amaratat ,..., Ved. amrtatva-, "long life" after-life pagan belief in it beneath the or "immortality" II5 n. 32. earth, xog-xo, II2, IIS; in Paradise, no- Amaratat [Amurdad] personification of 12; Zoroastrian beliefs, 235-42, 328. "Long Life" and "Immortality", one of the Agni identified with Apam Napat, 45-6; 7 great Amasa Spantas (q.v.), 203; dis­ the nature of his primary concept, 69-70.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability of Pastoral Nomads to Multiple Socio-Political and Climate Stresses – the Shahsevan of Northwest Iran
    Pastoralism under Pressure: Vulnerability of Pastoral Nomads to Multiple Socio-political and Climate Stresses – The Shahsevan of Northwest Iran Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn vorgelegt von Asghar Tahmasebi aus Tabriz/Iran Bonn 2012 Angefertigt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Gedruckt mit Unterstützung des Deutschen Akademischen Austauschdienstes (DAAD) 1. Referent: Prof.Dr. Eckart Ehlers 2. Referent: Prof.Dr. Winfried Schenk Tag der Promotion: June 25, 2012 Erscheinungsjahr: 2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................. i List of maps ..................................................................................................................................... iv List of tables .................................................................................................................................... iv List of figures ................................................................................................................................... vi List of Persian words ....................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why Was the Story of Arash-I Kamangir Excluded from the Shahnameh?” Iran Nameh, 29:2 (Summer 2014), 42-63
    Saghi Gazerani, “Why Was the Story of Arash-i Kamangir Excluded from the Shahnameh?” Iran Nameh, 29:2 (Summer 2014), 42-63. Why Was the Story of Arash-i Kamangir Excluded from the Shahnameh?* Saghi Gazerani Independent Scholar In contemporary Iranian culture, the legendary figure of Arash-i Kamangir, or Arash the Archer, is known and celebrated as the national hero par excellence. After all, he is willing to lay down his life by infusing his arrow with his life force in order to restore territories usurped by Iran’s enemy. As the legend goes, he does so in order to have the arrow move to the farthest point possible for the stretch of land over which the arrow flies shall be included in Iranshahr proper. The story without a doubt was popular for many centuries, but during the various upheavals of the twentieth century, the story of Arash the Archer was invoked, and in the hands of artists with various political leanings his figure was imbued with layers reflecting the respective artist’s ideological presuppositions.1 The most famous of modern renditions of Arash’s legend is Siavash Kasra’i’s narrative poem named after its protagonist. An excerpt of Kasra’i’s rendition of Arash’s story *For further discussion of this issue please see my ture,” www.iranicaonline.org (accessed March 3, forthcoming work, On the Margins of Historiog- 2014). Arash continues to make his appearance; raphy: The Sistani Cycle of Epics and Iran’s Na- for a recent operatic performance of the legend, tional History (Leiden: Brill, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • History Religion Tokarev.Pdf
    STUDENT'S LIBRARY Sergei Tokarev History of RELIGION PROGRESS PUBLISHERS MOSCOW Translated from the Russian by Paula Garb Editorial Board of the Series: F.M. Volkov (Managing Editor), Ye.F. Gubsky (Deputy Managing Editor), V.G. Afanasyev, Taufik Ibrahim, Zafar Imam, I.S. Kon, I.M. Krivoguz, A.V. Petrovsky, Yu.N. Popov, Munis Reza, N.V. Romanovsky, V.A. Tumanov, A.G. Zdravomyslov, V.D. Zotov. BHEJIHOTEKA CTYflEHTA C. T oK apeB HCTOPMH PEJIWrHM Ha ammiucKOM H3biKe © IIOJIHTH3AaT, 1986 © Progress Publishers 1989 Printed in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 0400000000-438 g 9 014(01)-89 ISBN 5-01-001097-6 Contents TRIBAL CULTS Chapter One ARCHEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ................................ 9 1. Paleolithic S ite s ........................................................................ 9 2. Neolithic S ites.............................................................................. 13 3. Religion in the Early Bronze and Iron Age .... 16 Chapter Two RELIGION OF THE AUSTRALIANS AND TASMANIANS............................ 18 1. The A u stralian s........................................................................ 18 2. The T asm anians........................................................................ 33 Chapter Three RELIGION IN OCEANIA ........................................................................ 35 1. The Papuans and M elanesians.................................................. 36 2. The P olynesians........................................................................ 42 Chapter Four
    [Show full text]
  • El Culto Del Dios Mithra En El Antiguo Irán Es Un Aspecto Que Parece Quedar Reflejado En El
    EL CULTO DEL DIOS MITHRA EN EL ANTIGUO IRAN Y EN EL IMPERIO ROMANO: ANÁLISIS Y REVISIÓN DE LOS ELEMENTOS DE CONTINUIDAD. ISRAEL CAMPOS MÉNDEZ INDICE. INTRODUCCIÓN. 3 CAPITULO I. MITHRA EN ORIENTE. 13 1. LOS ORÍGENES DEL DIOS. 13 2. MITHRA DENTRO DEL ZOROASTRISMO. 21 - Mithra Avéstico. 29 - Calendario Avéstico. 34 - Mithrakân. 36 - Nombres Teofóricos. 40 - El Canto X del Avesta: Mihr Yasht. 44 3. MITHRA Y LA MONARQUÍA PERSA AQUEMÉNIDA. 49 - Política Religiosa de los Aqueménidas. 52 - La Religión de los Reyes Aqueménidas. 54 - Mithra y los reyes aqueménidas. 57 - Mithra en la Monarquía Aqueménida. 66 4. MITHRA EN LOS REINOS HELENÍSTICOS DE ASIA MENOR Y EN EL IMPERIO PARTO. 68 - Mithra y los Reinos Helenísticos de Asia Menor. 71 - Mithra en el Imperio Parto: Arsácidas y Sasánidas. 81 CAPITULO II. MITHRA EN OCCIDENTE. 116 1. APARICIÓN DE LOS MISTERIOS. 82 2. MECANISMOS DE DIFUSIÓN. 90 3. ELEMENTOS CENTRALES DEL MITRAISMO. 94 - El relato mítico. 95 - Iconografía. 100 - Lugar del culto. 108 - La práctica cultual, iniciación y grados. 111 - Composición social y relaciones con el exterior de los misterios. 123 CAPITULO III. ELEMENTOS DE CONTINUIDAD. 127 MITHRA Y EL SOL. 130 MITHRA Y EL ESTAMENTO GUERRERO. 136 MITHRA Y EL SACRIFICIO DEL TORO. 144 MITHRA Y LAS PALABRAS E IMÁGENES IRANIAS. 148 CONCLUSIONES. 160 APENDICE DE FIGURAS E IMÁGENES. 166 BIBLIOGRAFÍA 177 FUENTES CLÁSICAS UTILIZADAS. 189 INDICE ONOMÁSTICO. 193 INDICE DE AUTORES CLÁSICOS. 196 INTRODUCCIÓN. La intención con la que hemos realizado el presente trabajo de investigación se encuentra marcada por el interés que en el ámbito particular suscita el campo de la Historia de las Religiones antiguas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Religions J.N.K
    A Comparative Study of Religions J.N.K. Mugambi Published by African Books Collective Mugambi, J.N.K. A Comparative Study of Religions: Second Edition. African Books Collective, 2010. Project MUSE.muse.jhu.edu/book/39862. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/39862 [ Access provided at 12 Apr 2020 15:13 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] 29 D.W. Waruta The teaching of Zarathustra are found mainly in the Gathas. In later writings in the history of Zoroastrianism, as happens with most religions, there were some changes in the teachings, but all the same Zarathustras teachings have continued as the basis and foundation of the teachings of Zorastrianism. The religion Zarathustra taught was not a completely new religion; it was rather a religion based on the old religion of his people, but which he reformed so radically that it had now important elements and teachings deriving from his prophetic genius. First and foremost, in opposition to the polytheism and ritualism of the old religion, Zarathustra taught a unique ethical monotheism.1 He declared Ahura Mazdas the one and only true God. This deity was already known in the old religion and was paid a special allegiance by Zarathustra’s own clan; and in comparison to other deities he was regarded as highly ethical. Ahura Mazda seems to be identical with Varuna, a sky god of vedic religion, who was similarly regarded as a very ethical god. Ahura Mazda then, is the one who called Zarathustra to his presence, who revealed himself to him as the one and only true God, who instructed him on the true religion appointing him his 1 Noss, J.B., Man’s Religions, p.
    [Show full text]