Mithra and the Imperial Power of Rome. Prof
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
On the Good Faith
On the Good Faith Zoroastrianism is ascribed to the teachings of the legendary prophet Zarathustra and originated in ancient times. It was developed within the area populated by the Iranian peoples, and following the Arab conquest, it formed into a diaspora. In modern Russia it has evolved since the end of the Soviet era. It has become an attractive object of cultural produc- tion due to its association with Oriental philosophies and religions and its rearticulation since the modern era in Europe. The lasting appeal of Zoroastrianism evidenced by centuries of book pub- lishing in Russia was enlivened in the 1990s. A new, religious, and even occult dimension was introduced with the appearance of neo-Zoroastrian groups with their own publications and online websites (dedicated to Zoroastrianism). This study focuses on the intersectional relationships and topical analysis of different Zoroastrian themes in modern Russia. On the Good Faith A Fourfold Discursive Construction of Zoroastrianism in Contemporary Russia Anna Tessmann Anna Tessmann Södertörns högskola SE-141 89 Huddinge [email protected] www.sh.se/publications On the Good Faith A Fourfold Discursive Construction of Zoroastrianism in Contemporary Russia Anna Tessmann Södertörns högskola 2012 Södertörns högskola SE-141 89 Huddinge www.sh.se/publications Cover Image: Anna Tessmann Cover Design: Jonathan Robson Layout: Jonathan Robson & Per Lindblom Printed by E-print, Stockholm 2012 Södertörn Doctoral Dissertations 68 ISSN 1652-7399 ISBN 978-91-86069-50-6 Avhandlingar utgivna vid -
Diocletian's New Empire
1 Diocletian's New Empire Eutropius, Brevarium, 9.18-27.2 (Eutr. 9.18-27.2) 18. After the death of Probus, CARUS was created emperor, a native of Narbo in Gaul, who immediately made his sons, Carinus and Numerianus, Caesars, and reigned, in conjunction with them, two years. News being brought, while he was engaged in a war with the Sarmatians, of an insurrection among the Persians, he set out for the east, and achieved some noble exploits against that people; he routed them in the field, and took Seleucia and Ctesiphon, their noblest cities, but, while he was encamped on the Tigris, he was killed by lightning. His son NUMERIANUS, too, whom he had taken with him to Persia, a young man of very great ability, while, from being affected with a disease in his eyes, he was carried in a litter, was cut off by a plot of which Aper, his father-in-law, was the promoter; and his death, though attempted craftily to be concealed until Aper could seize the throne, was made known by the odour of his dead body; for the soldiers, who attended him, being struck by the smell, and opening the curtains of his litter, discovered his death some days after it had taken place. 19. 1. In the meantime CARINUS, whom Carus, when he set out to the war with Parthia, had left, with the authority of Caesar, to command in Illyricum, Gaul, and Italy, disgraced himself by all manner of crimes; he put to death many innocent persons on false accusations, formed illicit connexions with the wives of noblemen, and wrought the ruin of several of his school-fellows, who happened to have offended him at school by some slight provocation. -
The Cambridge Companion to Age of Constantine.Pdf
The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine offers students a com- prehensive one-volume introduction to this pivotal emperor and his times. Richly illustrated and designed as a readable survey accessible to all audiences, it also achieves a level of scholarly sophistication and a freshness of interpretation that will be welcomed by the experts. The volume is divided into five sections that examine political history, reli- gion, social and economic history, art, and foreign relations during the reign of Constantine, a ruler who gains in importance because he steered the Roman Empire on a course parallel with his own personal develop- ment. Each chapter examines the intimate interplay between emperor and empire and between a powerful personality and his world. Collec- tively, the chapters show how both were mutually affected in ways that shaped the world of late antiquity and even affect our own world today. Noel Lenski is Associate Professor of Classics at the University of Colorado, Boulder. A specialist in the history of late antiquity, he is the author of numerous articles on military, political, cultural, and social history and the monograph Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century ad. Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S Edited by Noel Lenski University of Colorado Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521818384 c Cambridge University Press 2006 This publication is in copyright. -
Collector's Checklist for Roman Imperial Coinage
Liberty Coin Service Collector’s Checklist for Roman Imperial Coinage (49 BC - AD 518) The Twelve Caesars - The Julio-Claudians and the Flavians (49 BC - AD 96) Purchase Emperor Denomination Grade Date Price Julius Caesar (49-44 BC) Augustus (31 BC-AD 14) Tiberius (AD 14 - AD 37) Caligula (AD 37 - AD 41) Claudius (AD 41 - AD 54) Tiberius Nero (AD 54 - AD 68) Galba (AD 68 - AD 69) Otho (AD 69) Nero Vitellius (AD 69) Vespasian (AD 69 - AD 79) Otho Titus (AD 79 - AD 81) Domitian (AD 81 - AD 96) The Nerva-Antonine Dynasty (AD 96 - AD 192) Nerva (AD 96-AD 98) Trajan (AD 98-AD 117) Hadrian (AD 117 - AD 138) Antoninus Pius (AD 138 - AD 161) Marcus Aurelius (AD 161 - AD 180) Hadrian Lucius Verus (AD 161 - AD 169) Commodus (AD 177 - AD 192) Marcus Aurelius Years of Transition (AD 193 - AD 195) Pertinax (AD 193) Didius Julianus (AD 193) Pescennius Niger (AD 193) Clodius Albinus (AD 193- AD 195) The Severans (AD 193 - AD 235) Clodius Albinus Septimus Severus (AD 193 - AD 211) Caracalla (AD 198 - AD 217) Purchase Emperor Denomination Grade Date Price Geta (AD 209 - AD 212) Macrinus (AD 217 - AD 218) Diadumedian as Caesar (AD 217 - AD 218) Elagabalus (AD 218 - AD 222) Severus Alexander (AD 222 - AD 235) Severus The Military Emperors (AD 235 - AD 284) Alexander Maximinus (AD 235 - AD 238) Maximus Caesar (AD 235 - AD 238) Balbinus (AD 238) Maximinus Pupienus (AD 238) Gordian I (AD 238) Gordian II (AD 238) Gordian III (AD 238 - AD 244) Philip I (AD 244 - AD 249) Philip II (AD 247 - AD 249) Gordian III Trajan Decius (AD 249 - AD 251) Herennius Etruscus -
El Culto Del Dios Mithra En El Antiguo Irán Es Un Aspecto Que Parece Quedar Reflejado En El
EL CULTO DEL DIOS MITHRA EN EL ANTIGUO IRAN Y EN EL IMPERIO ROMANO: ANÁLISIS Y REVISIÓN DE LOS ELEMENTOS DE CONTINUIDAD. ISRAEL CAMPOS MÉNDEZ INDICE. INTRODUCCIÓN. 3 CAPITULO I. MITHRA EN ORIENTE. 13 1. LOS ORÍGENES DEL DIOS. 13 2. MITHRA DENTRO DEL ZOROASTRISMO. 21 - Mithra Avéstico. 29 - Calendario Avéstico. 34 - Mithrakân. 36 - Nombres Teofóricos. 40 - El Canto X del Avesta: Mihr Yasht. 44 3. MITHRA Y LA MONARQUÍA PERSA AQUEMÉNIDA. 49 - Política Religiosa de los Aqueménidas. 52 - La Religión de los Reyes Aqueménidas. 54 - Mithra y los reyes aqueménidas. 57 - Mithra en la Monarquía Aqueménida. 66 4. MITHRA EN LOS REINOS HELENÍSTICOS DE ASIA MENOR Y EN EL IMPERIO PARTO. 68 - Mithra y los Reinos Helenísticos de Asia Menor. 71 - Mithra en el Imperio Parto: Arsácidas y Sasánidas. 81 CAPITULO II. MITHRA EN OCCIDENTE. 116 1. APARICIÓN DE LOS MISTERIOS. 82 2. MECANISMOS DE DIFUSIÓN. 90 3. ELEMENTOS CENTRALES DEL MITRAISMO. 94 - El relato mítico. 95 - Iconografía. 100 - Lugar del culto. 108 - La práctica cultual, iniciación y grados. 111 - Composición social y relaciones con el exterior de los misterios. 123 CAPITULO III. ELEMENTOS DE CONTINUIDAD. 127 MITHRA Y EL SOL. 130 MITHRA Y EL ESTAMENTO GUERRERO. 136 MITHRA Y EL SACRIFICIO DEL TORO. 144 MITHRA Y LAS PALABRAS E IMÁGENES IRANIAS. 148 CONCLUSIONES. 160 APENDICE DE FIGURAS E IMÁGENES. 166 BIBLIOGRAFÍA 177 FUENTES CLÁSICAS UTILIZADAS. 189 INDICE ONOMÁSTICO. 193 INDICE DE AUTORES CLÁSICOS. 196 INTRODUCCIÓN. La intención con la que hemos realizado el presente trabajo de investigación se encuentra marcada por el interés que en el ámbito particular suscita el campo de la Historia de las Religiones antiguas. -
The Extension of Imperial Authority Under Diocletian and the Tetrarchy, 285-305Ce
University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2012 The Extension Of Imperial Authority Under Diocletian And The Tetrarchy, 285-305ce Joshua Petitt University of Central Florida Part of the History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Petitt, Joshua, "The Extension Of Imperial Authority Under Diocletian And The Tetrarchy, 285-305ce" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 2412. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2412 THE EXTENSION OF IMPERIAL AUTHORITY UNDER DIOCLETIAN AND THE TETRARCHY, 285-305CE. by JOSHUA EDWARD PETITT B.A. History, University of Central Florida 2009 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2012 © 2012 Joshua Petitt ii ABSTRACT Despite a vast amount of research on Late Antiquity, little attention has been paid to certain figures that prove to be influential during this time. The focus of historians on Constantine I, the first Roman Emperor to allegedly convert to Christianity, has often come at the cost of ignoring Constantine's predecessor, Diocletian, sometimes known as the "Second Father of the Roman Empire". The success of Constantine's empire has often been attributed to the work and reforms of Diocletian, but there have been very few studies of the man beyond simple biography. -
Mithra Oct 2015
Mithra The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation James R. Russell. 2015. "Mithra." In the Proceedings of Genocide of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire in the Great War, 1915-2015: One Hundred Years of Research. International Conference on the Armenian Genocide, Sorbonne, Paris, France, March 25-28, 2015. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:23514774 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP Mithra. By James R. Russell, Harvard University. I want to take you to the ancient city of Dura Europos. Dura, whose Aramaic name means something like “fortified place” was a populous, cosmopolitan walled city on a hill looking over the Euphrates frontier of the Roman Empire with the realms of the Arsacid Parthians, near modern-day Deir ez-Zor in Syria. The Seleucid successors of Alexander made what had been a fort into a town, appending its second, Greek name. Dura Europos was destroyed, never again to be inhabited, during a sudden, swift Sasanian attack in AD 256: devastating for the inhabitants but good for archeology. The French occupying forces discovered the ruins in 1918; and over the succeeding two decades a team of archeologists excavated it and for generations art historians and textual scholars have pored over the finds: great scholars such as Franz Cumont, father of Mithraic studies, and Mikhail Rostovtzeff, historian of the Hellenistic era, worked there. -
The Rescripts of the Emperor Probus (276-282 A.D.)
Digital Commons @ Georgia Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 6-1-1974 The Rescripts of the Emperor Probus (276-282 A.D.) Alan Watson University of Georgia School of Law, [email protected] Repository Citation Alan Watson, The Rescripts of the Emperor Probus (276-282 A.D.) (1974), Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/265 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Works by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. Please share how you have benefited from this access For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RESCRIPTS OF THE EMPEROR PROBUS (276-282 A.D.) ALAN WATSON* Scholars tend to date the onset of the "post-classical period" of Roman law to 235 A.D., the year when the Emperor Alexander Severus was murdered by his troops. The line of great jurists had just about come to an end-Ulpian had been murdered by the mutinous Praetorians in 223-and for the next fifty years, until the accession of Diocletian, the Empire was in a state of chaos. The post-classical period itself divides neatly into eras: early post-classical (or epiclassic as F. Wieacker suggests1 ), Diocletianic, Constantinian, and so on, right up to the time of Justinian. One thing these eras have in common is relative neglect by modern legal historians. Yet, they have a charm and fascination of their own. The charm is that, for the first time in Roman law, we have primarily to study texts that we know concerned real people and 2 real situations; the sources, almost entirely imperial rescripts, reflect the immediate practical concerns of the addressees, not the interests of the jurists. -
Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 79 (1989) 181–187 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt Gmbh, Bonn
RONALD SYME A LOST LEGATE OF AQUITANIA aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 79 (1989) 181–187 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 181 A LOST LEGATE OF AQUITANIA. I. Revision of a familiar text often has wide repercus- sions. By paradox it may even cause a fact to be extruded and passed over by scholars in the sequel. Such has been the fate in the recent time of Salvius Valens, a governor of Aquitania who in the Digest receives a rescript from Antoninus Pius (48.7.2.2) and who stood as PIR1 S 116. His name occurred as the second (following Vindius Ve- rus) in the list of jurists favoured by Pius, according to the text in the Historia Augusta (12.1). For centuries it abode without question until 1870, when Mommsen saw that something was out of order: the great Julian omitted, P. Salvius lulianus (cos. 148).1) Error was patent, and so was the remedy. Author or copyist had amalgamated two ju-rists, Salvius Julianus and Aburnius Valens. The latter, registered by the Digest as successor to Javolenus Priscus in leadership of the Sabinian School, benefits from epigraphic testimony to nomenclature and early career, being L. Fulvius C.f. Pup. Aburnius Valens, quaestor to Hadrian about the year 125.2) * * * II. Forfeiting a place among the counsellors of an empe- ror, Salvius Valens the legate of Aquitania has suffered occlusion. He could not secure admission to two recent ca- __________ 1) Duly cited by Dessau in PIR1 S 116. 2) On Aburnius (registered as PIR2 F 526), who has failed to attract much attention, see 'The Jurists Approved by Antoninus Pius', forthcoming. -
An Interesting Family: Carus and His Sons by Peter E
An interesting Family: Carus and his Sons by Peter E. Lewis The Ctesiphon Arch, Iraq by S.A. Svoboda, 1826-96. (Wikimedia Commons) ARUS and his sons, Carinus and pro claimed Carus emperor. At the time means they were probably limited in CNumerian, were Roman emperors in Carus was at Sirmium and Probus sent number. Carus had no reservations abo ut the 3 rd century AD. They were military part of his army to defeat the rebels, but using this inscription and it appears on men, very capable and successful in what when they joined forces with Carus, the a double antoninianus minted at Siscia in they did, but all ultimately destroyed by soldiers remaining with Probus murdered 282 ( Figure 3 ) and for the first time on an treachery. Although generally forgotten him not far from Sirmium. aureus ( Figure 4 ). The double antonini - today, coin collectors can follow their car- When he became emperor Carus ass- anus shows Carus with the sun-god, Sol eers because large numbers of coins were umed the name Marcus Aurelius Carus. Invictus. The emperor Aurelian (270-275) minted during their reigns. His two sons also added ‘Marcus Aurelius’ had promoted the worship of Sol Invictus Carus was born in about 224 AD at to their names, as had Probus when he Narbo in Gaul. ( Figure 1 – map ) Narbo became emperor in 276. Marcus Aurelius had been a Roman colony since 118 BC. had been a successful and popular Roman Carus rose through the ranks eventually emperor in the 2 nd century AD and by becoming the commander of the Praetor- assuming his name Carus intended to ian Guard, a powerful position in the signify a similar career. -
DOMITIAN, the SENATE and the PROVINCES by H. W. PLEKET The
DOMITIAN, THE SENATE AND THE PROVINCES BY H. W. PLEKET The portrait which has been drawn both by ancient and modern authors of the Emperor Domitian is certainly not a flattering one. We are asked to believe that Domitian was a detestable autocrat, ready to eliminate all those who were not prepared to bear his tyranny. In his barbaric fight against what Pliny and Tacitus would have called most respectable senators, e.g. Helvidius Priscus, Rusticus Arulenus, Herennius Senecio and Jun. Mauricus 1), he availed himself of the help of such despicable characters as Regulus, Fabricus Veiento, Catullus Messalinus and Mettius Carus 2), all notorious delatores. Not content with their lives he also confiscat- ed their possessions and banished their relatives (Fannia, Arria, Gratilla 3). Those who might seem to win too much favour with the population were either killed or compelled to retire from public life (Agricola 4). It was complete chaos everywhere. The army was a band of undisciplined soldiers; the senate had degenerated into a group of trembling and speechless slaves 5), who regarding Domitian as a source of imminent danger, could not say what they wanted to say. Domitian moreover had brought the state to the brink of bankruptcy by his financial extravagances 6). He had increased the pay of the legionaries with one third, spoiled Rome's citizens by prodigious festivals and shows, while his building program did the rest 1). In short, his reign was one of devastating terror and extra- i) Cf. Pliny Ep. 1. 5. 2, 3, 5, 10; 3. II. 3; 5. -
Evolution of the Zoroastrian Iconography and Temple Cults
O. BASIROV ANES 38 (2001) 160-177 Evolution of the Zoroastrian Iconography and Temple Cults Oric BASIROV 1 Ilchester Place London W14 8AA UK Fax: +44 207 602 9280 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Gathas of Zoroaster does not refer to any iconography or temples. Indeed, a doctrinal aversion to such rituals can be detected in his teachings. His seven ab- stract and amorphic Amesha Spentas, for example, are probably the first purely conceptual deities with a built-in deterrent to artistic representation. His pre- scribed places of daily rituals, moreover, are mountaintops and riverbanks, and not temples. Such devotional purity and simplicity is also confirmed by the lack of hardly any archaeological evidence to the contrary in the prophet's homeland in Eastern Iran. This is also the case in the pre-imperial period in Western Iran, where the centre of religion moved early in the first millennium BC. Assyrian annals and many classical writers also confirm that Medes and early Achaemenians did not have any cult statues and temples. The latter, however, soon after forming the first world empire, developed the many aspects of, by now, familiar Zoroastrian iconography. This was inspired, no doubt, by the artistic repertoire of their western subjects, such as the Babylonians, Elamites, Greeks and Egyptians. Nor could the Achaemenians refrain, towards the end of their rule, from building temples, both to house their own sacred fire, and the alien-inspired divine images. These two distinct temple cults, established around 400 BC, appear to have spread throughout the Achaemenian, and later, the Parthian Empires.