DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation Finale Du Prcndge Togo Rapport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation Finale Du Prcndge Togo Rapport UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Terminal evaluation for the Strengthening National and Decentralised Management for Global Environmental Benefits Project (PRCNDGE) UNDP PIMS ID 4460, GEF ID 4765 FINAL REPORT October 2017 Table of contents i. Introduction page ............................................................................................................. ii ii. Summary .......................................................................................................................... iv ii.1. Project Summary Table .................................................................................................. iv ii.2. Short project description ................................................................................................. v ii.3. Evaluation rating table ................................................................................................... vi ii.4. Summary of conclusions, recommendations and lessons ............................................ viii ii.4.1. Main conclusions ................................................................................................. viii ii.4.2. Lessons, recommendations and findings ........................................................... viii iii. Acronyms and abbreviations........................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background to the study .................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Evaluation objective ........................................................................................................ 1 1.3. Scope ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.4. Methodology ................................................................................................................... 2 1.4.1. Documentation review ........................................................................................... 2 1.4.2. Interviews ................................................................................................................ 2 1.4.3. Analysis framework used....................................................................................... 2 1.4.4. Evaluation questions .............................................................................................. 3 1.5. Limitations and remedial measures ................................................................................. 3 1.6. Evaluation timetable ........................................................................................................ 3 1.7. Evaluation report structure .............................................................................................. 4 2. Project development description and context ................................................................ 5 2.1. Project start-up and duration ........................................................................................... 5 2.2. Project context ................................................................................................................. 5 2.3. Short-term objectives and project development .............................................................. 5 2.4. Basic indicators put in place ............................................................................................ 6 2.5. Organisation of project implementation .......................................................................... 7 2.6. Main stakeholders ........................................................................................................... 8 2.7. Project intervention sites ................................................................................................. 9 2.8. Expected outcomes ........................................................................................................ 10 3. Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Project design/formulation ............................................................................................. 11 3.1.1. LFA analysis of outcomes (project logic/strategy; indicators) ......................... 11 3.1.2. Assumptions and risks ......................................................................................... 16 Terminal evaluation report on Strengthening National and Decentralised Management for Global Environmental Benefits Project, Togo i 3.1.3. Lessons learned from other relevant projects (for example, in the same focal area) built into the project design. ................................................................................ 16 3.1.4. Planned stakeholder involvement ....................................................................... 17 3.1.5. Replication approach ........................................................................................... 18 3.1.6. The UNDP’s comparative advantage ................................................................. 19 3.1.7. Links between the project and other work in the capacity-building sector in environmental management .......................................................................................... 19 3.1.8. Management procedures ..................................................................................... 20 3.2. Project implementation ................................................................................................. 22 3.2.1. Adaptive management (changes made to project design and project outcomes during implementation) ................................................................................................. 22 3.2.2. Partnership agreements (with relevant stakeholders involved in the country/region) ............................................................................................................... 22 3.2.3. Comments from monitoring and evaluation activities used in adaptive management .................................................................................................................... 23 3.2.4. Project financing .................................................................................................. 23 3.2.5. Monitoring and evaluation: at project start-up and implementation ............. 26 3.2.6. Coordination of implementation and execution with the UNDP and implementation partner and operational questions .................................................... 27 3.3 Project outcomes ............................................................................................................ 28 3.3.1. Overall outcomes (achievement of objectives) ................................................... 28 3.3.2. Relevance ............................................................................................................... 29 3.3.2. Effectiveness .......................................................................................................... 32 3.3.3. Efficiency ............................................................................................................... 39 3.3.4. Acceptance by the country .................................................................................. 40 3.3.5. Integration ............................................................................................................. 40 3.3.6. Sustainability ........................................................................................................ 41 3.3.7. Impact .................................................................................................................... 42 4. Conclusions, recommendations and lessons..................................................................... 44 4.1. Remedial measures on the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the project ................................................................................................................................... 44 4.2. Measures intended to monitor or strengthen the project’s initial benefits .................... 44 4.3. Proposals for future directions in favour of the main objectives .................................. 44 4.4. The best and worst practices while dealing with questions concerning relevance, performance and success ...................................................................................................... 44 5. Appendices .......................................................................................................................... 47 5.1. TORs ............................................................................................................................. 47 5.2. Table of actions for implementation of recommendations - roadmap .......................... 70 5.2. Itinerary ......................................................................................................................... 73 Terminal evaluation report on Strengthening National and Decentralised Management for Global Environmental Benefits Project, Togo ii 5.3. List of persons met ........................................................................................................ 78 5.4. Summary of site visits ................................................................................................... 79 5.5. List of documents examined ........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ngo Assessment in Togo
    NGO ASSESSMENT IN TOGO: Institutional and Technical Capability Assessement of Non-Governmental Organizations Active in the Health and Population Sector in Togo prepared by: Franklin Baer Eileen McGinn Arthur Lagacd in collaboration with Samuela Bell October 1993 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Phase II NGO Assessment team expresses its sincere thanks to OAR/Togo for its warm hospitality and assistance in conducting this study. A special thanks to Samuela Bell for her Phase I inventory of NGOs which was certainly the richest resource of information for the Phase II team. Thanks also to Sara Clark, John Grant, Karen Wilkens and Barbara McKinney with whom the team worked most closely. The team also acknowledges the devoted hard work of the many NGOs - large or small, national or international, urban or rural - who are working tirelessly throughout Togo to improve the health and well being of the Togolese population. The assessment team hopes that the projects proposed by this report will rapidly develop into practical interventions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: NGO ASSESSMENT IN TOGO 1. Assessment Title: Istitutional and Technical Capability Assessment of Non-Govemmenta' Organizations Active in the Health and Population Sector in Togo 2. Objectives: The objectives of Phase II of the NGO assessment were to: " Select a sample of NGOs for in-depth assessment; " Assess the institutional capabilities of these NGOs in HPN sector; " Identify activities NGOs wish to sustain, expand or initiate in the areas of health services, family planning/HIV, and cost recovery/drug supply; * Identify NGOs capable of contracting with OAR/Togo; and * Identify options & modalities for AID assistance to NGOs.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
    United Nations CEDAW/C/TGO/1-5 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 18 March 2004 English against Women Original: French Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Consideration of reports submitted by States Parties under article 18 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Initial, second, third, fourth and fifth periodic reports of States Parties Togo* * The present report is being issued without formal editing. 04-27833 (E) 060504 060504 *0427833* CEDAW/C/TGO/1-5 Contents Page Abbreviations ................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................... 10 Part 1: General information about Togo .............................................. 11 1. The geographic setting ........................................................ 11 2. Political and administrative structure............................................. 27 Administrative map of Togo ....................................................... 30 3. General legal framework for the protection of human rights in Togo ................... 30 4. Information and publicity ...................................................... 32 Part II: Information relating to articles 1 to 16 of the Convention ......................... 33 Article 1 ....................................................................... 33 Article 2 ....................................................................... 34 Article 3
    [Show full text]
  • ECOWAS Peace & Security Report
    ISSUE 10 | OCTOBER 2014 ECOWAS Peace & Security Report Politicians talk past each other as Togo’s 2015 elections approach Introduction While the presidential election in Togo is scheduled for the first quarter of 2015, politicians have still not reached agreement on the implementation of the policy reforms of the 2006 Global Political Agreement. The events of recent months illustrate the seriousness of the political impasse on these issues, which are central to the governance of the country. While the presidential election in Togo is scheduled for the first quarter of 2015, politicians have still not reached agreement on the implementation of the policy reforms of the 2006 Global Political Agreement. The events of recent months illustrate the seriousness of the political impasse on these issues, which are central to the governance of the country. On 30 June 2014, the National Assembly rejected the bill on constitutional and institutional reforms that had been tabled a week earlier by the Government.1 This bill proposed limiting the presidential term to two five-year periods, allowing a two-round presidential election, creating a Senate, reforming the Constitutional Court, defining the prerogatives of the Prime Minister and instituting new eligibility criteria for the presidency. This rejection reflects the failure of the so-called ‘Togo Telecom’ political dialogue, which ended in June 2014. The dialogue failed to reach consensus on the implementation of constitutional and institutional reforms, some of which concerned preparations for the 2015 election. For eight years, the conditions for implementing these reforms have regularly been put back on the agenda without any significant progress being observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport ENG- Conciliation ITIE Togo 2012
    REPUBLIQUE TOGOLAISE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES TRANSPARENCY INITIATIVE EITI TOGO REPORT ON THE RECONCILIATION OF EXTRACTIVE PAYMENTS AND REVENUES FOR THE YEAR 2012 August 2015 This report is established by request of the Multistakeholders Group of EITI Togo. The views expressed in this report are those of the Reconciler and in no way reflect the official opinion of EITI Togo. This report has been prepared solely for use of EITI Togo for the purpose it is intended. Collecte et conciliation des paiements et des recettes du secteur extractif au titre de l’année 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 5 Background ................................................................................................................................... 5 Objective ................................................................................................................................... 5 Nature and extent of our work ......................................................................................................... 5 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 7 1.1. Revenue from the Extractive Sector ....................................................................................... 7 1.2. Exports ................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3. Report Scope .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Gbe Language Varieties of West Africa: a Quantitative Analysis of Lexical and Grammatical Features
    DigitalResources Electronic Survey Report 2008-023 THE GBE LANGUAGE VARIETIES OF WEST AFRICA: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEXICAL AND GRAMMATICAL FEATURES Angela Kluge THE GBE LANGUAGE VARIETIES OF WEST AFRICA: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEXICAL AND GRAMMATICAL FEATURES Angela Kluge Submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Arts in Language and Communication Research School of English, Communication and Philosophy University of Wales, College of Cardiff 2000 SIL Forum for Language Fieldwork 2008-023, August 2008 ©Angela Kluge and SIL International All rights reserved To the Gbe people groups of West Africa ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the following for all the help and support they have given me during this last year. First, I would like to thank my friends at home and abroad for providing me with the financial support which has enabled me to study for this Master’s degree. Second, I would like to thank my colleagues and supervisors at SIL International and SIL Togo-Benin for making it possible for me to take this year of study-leave and for contributing to my support. I would also like to thank my supervisor Dr. Gordon Tucker for the time, support, and guidance he has given to me over the last few months. In addition, I would like to thank Dr. Angie Williams at the Centre for Language and Communication (Cardiff University) for her initial advice on the statistical methods chosen for this dissertation and for pointing me to the pertinent literature. Furthermore, I would like to thank Paul McGeoghan at the Computing Centre (Cardiff University) for so patiently explaining to me the basics of cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Environment Facility
    Naoko Ishii PhD GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson INVESTING IN OUR PLANET 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 USA Tel: 202.473.3202 Fax: 202.522.3240/3245 E-mail: [email protected] June 25, 2013 Dear LDCF/SCCF Council Member, IF AD as the Implementing Agency for the project entitled: Togo: Adapting Agriculture Production in Togo (ADAPT), has submitted the attached proposed project document for CEO endorsement prior to final approval of the project document in accordance with IF AD procedures. The Secretariat has reviewed the project document. It is consistent with the proposal approved by the LDCF/SCCF Council in October 2011 and the proposed project remains consistent with the Instrument and LDCF/GEF policies and procedures. The attached explanation prepared by IF AD satisfactorily details how Council's comments have been addressed. We have today posted the proposed project document on the GEF website at www.TheGEF.org for your information. We would welcome any comments you may wish to provide by July 24, 2013 before I endorse the project. You may send your comments to gcoordination@TheGEF .org . If you do not have access to the Web, you may request the local field office of UNDP or the World Bank to download the document for you. Alternatively, you may request a copy of the document from the S~cretariat. If you make such a request, please confirm for us your current mailing address. Sincerely, CEO and Chairperson Attachment: GEFSEC Project Review Document cc: Country Operational Focal Point, GEF
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made from the Original Document
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 464 871 SO 033 815 TITLE A Transnational View of Basic Education: Issues of Access, Quality, and Community Participation in West and Central Africa. INSTITUTION Academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC. SPONS AGENCY Agency for International Development (IDCA), Washington, DC. Bureau for Africa. PUB DATE 2002-01-06 NOTE 229p.; Prepared by Support for Analysis and Research in Africa project with subcontractors Tulane University, JHPIEGO, Morehouse School of Medicine, and Population Reference Bureau. This document is a synthesis of studies by Educational Research Network for West and Central Africa. CONTRACT AOT-C-00-99-00237-00 AVAILABLE FROM SARA Project, AED, 1825 Connecticut Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20009. Tel: 202-884-8069; Fax: 202-884-8447; Web site: http://www.aed.org/. PUB TYPE Collected Works General (020) Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Access to Education; *Community Involvement; Comparative Education; *Educational Quality; Educational Research; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; *Geographic Regions; Literature Reviews; *School Holding Power IDENTIFIERS Africa (Central); Africa (West); Basic Education; Development Education; Educational Issues; Research Synthesis ABSTRACT Most African countries_have devoted considerable attention to educating the generations of people born since the independence era. Despite their efforts, however, African governments continue to face rising illiteracy, grade-repetition, and drop-out rates, as well as growing
    [Show full text]
  • THE GLOBAL DRACUNCULIASIS ERADICATION CAMPAIGN by Eric
    THE GLOBAL DRACUNCULIASIS ERADICATION CAMPAIGN By Eric A. Butvidas A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Geography—Master of Science 2015 ABSTRACT THE GLOBAL DRACUNCULIASIS ERADICATION CAMPAIGN By Eric A. Butvidas Dracunculiasis , also referred to as Guinea worm disease (GWD), is an ancient scourge on the brink of eradication. It is contracted when humans drink water from sources infested by microcrustacean copepods harboring Guinea worm (GW) larvae. The copepods dissolve in the stomach and release the GW larvae which make their way to the gut of the final host. Soon after, male and female GWs mate and approximately one year after entering the human body, a gravid female GW protrudes through the final host’s skin to release her larvae, causing extreme pain and debilitation. The most common treatment involves the slow extraction of the GW over time, but the cycle can be repeated without education/prevention and control interventions. In 1981, a global campaign to eradicate GWD was initiated simultaneously with the United Nations’ International Drinking Water Supply and sanitation Decade (1981-1990). This thesis contributes to the existing body of literature on GWD by providing a review of the disease’s history, research, and global programmatic findings from 1981 to 2013. It reconstructs the Global Dracunculiasis Eradication Campaign (GDEC) using the data made publicly available by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization, and their affiliates chiefly through three publications: Guinea Worm Wrap-Up , Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report , and Weekly Epidemiological Record . Through this reconstruction of GDEC, hypotheses are generated about why GWD continues to persist in four sub-Sahara African countries: Chad, Ethiopia, Mali, and South Sudan.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Commitment Sport Social Volunteers Emergencies Outreach
    RAGB11 Foundation Commitment Sport Social Volunteers Emergencies Outreach Energy International Efficiency Sponsorship Missions www.fondation.veolia.com Funding Projects 2011 activity report Federating Employment Young people Partnership Workforce development Responsibility Cooperation Environmental Corporate Foundation Tel.: +33 (0)1 55 23 43 46 [email protected] • 2011 activity report Foundation Corporate Environnement Veolia conservation Networks VEOL_1205114_RA FONDATION_GB_COUV_564,5x220_v1.indd a1 04/06/12 15:47 Corporate Foundation governed by Law no. 87-571 of July 23, 1987 amended Head office: 36-38, avenue Kléber – 75116 Paris – France Mail address: 6, Esplanade Charles-de-Gaulle – 92751 Nanterre Cedex – France E-mail: [email protected] Chief editors: Dominique Boizeau, Claire Billon-Galland Editorial coordinator: Hélène Salmon Design, artwork and production: Photos: Veolia Environnement photo library, Veolia Environnement Foundation photo library, the Foundation’s sponsors, Veoliaforce sponsors, Julie Garlenq (IFRC), CASE photo library, Aymeric Warmé-Janville, Francis Demange, David Bild, Katharina Kuhlmey, To meet environmental concerns, this document was produced by PDI, an Axel Ducourneau (CNRS), Cécile Diaz, Marie Aurenche, Maison du fleuve Sénégal, MIX Imprim’Vert, FSC-certifi ed printing company, using organic, plant oil-based Christophe Majani d’Inguimbert From responsible inks. It was printed on Amber Preprint 120 g/m² paper (Arctic Paper) made from sources fi bers sourced from responsibly and sustainably managed
    [Show full text]
  • JPC7.3-Eng.Pdf (‎7.246Mb)
    Onchocerciasis Control Programme ln West Africa Programme de Lutte contre l'Onchoc€rcose en Afrique de l'Ouest' CONJOINT DU PROGRAMIVITi JOINT PROGRAMME CO]ilMMTEE COMITE .CCP Bureau du Pr€sident Offico of the Chairman JPC JOIN'T PROGRAMME COMMITTEE JPC7.3 Seventh sesslon (ocP /86.7) Accra, 9-12 December 1986 ORIGINAL : FRENCH ocrober 1986 a Provisional a item 1 ( t REPOBT ON THE EVALUATION OF THE SOCIOECONOMIC ]MPACT OF THE ONCHOCERCIASIS CONTROL PROGRAMME INTRODUCTION 1. The control of a public health disease is rightly considered by medical authorities as a health priority, especially when it j.s severely disabling for a considerable part of the population. The health priority becomes a national imperative when such a disease prevents the socioeconomic development of many areas 1n the country. When it extends beyond the borders of one country and the solution to the problem of public health lies in activities involving several countries, it ls necessary to arrive at a regional control. The inter-country cooperatlon can then appeal for in*.ernational aid proportional to the scope of the activity to be carried out. 2. Qnchocerciasis control corresponds to the above outline. This concerns bringing under control a severely disabling disease, river blindness, that is widespread in some of the African regions. This control will prompt the populations to reclaim lands that had been abandoned in the past and this will make it possible to improve the socj-oeconomic development of several countries. 3. It was with this end in vj.ew that four international agencies of the United Nations systems (UNDP, FAO, the Wor1d Bank, WHO), supported by a group of donors, decided in 7974 to assist seven West African countries (Benin, Burkj-na Faso, C6te d'Ivoire, Ghana, Ma1i, Niger and Togo) affected by onchocerclaisis.
    [Show full text]
  • English ERNWACA Front Cover
    ROCARE ERNWACA A Transnational View of Basic Education: Issues of Access, Quality, and Community Participation in West and Central Africa January 2002 Educational Research Network for West and Central Africa (ERNWACA) United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Support for Analysis and Research in Africa (SARA) Project A Transnational View of Basic Education This publication was prepared by the Support for Analysis and Research in Africa (SARA) project. SARA is operated by the Academy for Educational Development with subcontractors Tulane University, JHPIEGO, Morehouse School of Medicine, and Population Reference Bureau. SARA is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development through the Bureau for Africa, Office of Sustainable Development (AFR/SD/HRD) under Contract AOT-C-00-99-00237-00. Support for Analysis and Research in Africa (SARA) Academy for Educational Development 1825 Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel : 202-884-8000 Fax : 202-884-8447 E-mail : [email protected] Educational Research Network for West and Central Africa (ERNWACA) BP E1854 Bamako, Mali Tel : 223-21-16-12 Fax : 223-21-21-15 E-mail : [email protected] ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... v Acronyms and abreviations .................................................................................... vii Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 Access
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling up Diversity to Scale up Nutrition Nutrition Behaviour and Effective Interventions for Women and Infants in Zambia and Togo
    SLE BERLIN 2018 Centre for Rural Development (SLE) Berlin SLE PUBLICATION SERIES - S277 Scaling up diversity to scale up nutrition Nutrition behaviour and effective interventions for women and infants in Zambia and Togo Martin Thomas Schlecht, Sascha Berndt, Josefine Greber, Jan Marinko, Ukeme Okon Archibong , Anja Schmidt, Carolin Speckhahn, Hanna Weinsheimer PERSPECTIVES OF URBAN AGRICULTURE IN MAPUTO AND CAPE TOWN AND CAPE IN MAPUTO AGRICULTURE PERSPECTIVES OF URBAN 2019 ISSN: 1433-4585 ISBN: 3-936602-98-0 S 275 S 275 Scaling up diversity to scale up nutrition Nutrition behaviour and effective interventions for women and infants in Zambia and Togo Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung | Centre for Rural Development SLE has been offering practice-oriented vocational education and training for future experts and managers in the field of international development cooperation since 1962. The courses range from Postgraduate Studies to Training Courses for international experts in Berlin to practice-oriented research and Consultancy for Organizations and Universities active in the field of development cooperation. Martin Thomas Schlecht Teamleiter, M.Sc. Urban Ecosystem Sciences E-Mail: [email protected] Ukeme Okon Archibong M.Sc. Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics and Subtropics E-Mail: [email protected] Sascha Berndt M.A. Development Economics E-Mail: [email protected] Josefine Greber M.Sc. Human Security E-Mail: [email protected] Jan Marinko M.A. International Economics E-Mail: [email protected] Anja Schmidt M.Sc. Agricultural
    [Show full text]