DOCSLIB.ORG

Indian Creek Marta Station Area Executive Summary 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DEKALB COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH Master Active Living Plan INDIANINDIAN CREEK CREEK MARTAMARTA STATION STATION March 2013 October 2013 - DRAFT DeKalb County Board of Commissioners Elaine Boyer Jeff Rader Larry Johnson Sharon Sutton Lee May Kathie Gannon Stan Watson Management Team Andrew A. Baker, AICP DeKalb County Planning & Sustainability, Associate Director Shawanna N. Qawiy, MPA, MSCM DeKalb County Planning & Sustainability, Project Manager Sidney E. Douse, III, AICP DeKalb County Planning & Sustainability, Land Use Planner Planning Team Tunnell-Spangler-Walsh & Associates Grice Consulting Group Fox Environmental Graham and Associates Designing4Health Marketek Inc SL King Technologies, Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................2 PART III: PUBLIC PROCESS ..........................31 Community Health Recommendations .........................3 3.1 Process Overview................................................. 32 Land Use Recommendations ........................................4 Health Questionnaire ....................................................34 Urban Design Recommendations .................................4 Transportation Recommendations ................................5 PART IV: RECOMMENDATIONS .................. 37 Housing & Economic Development Recommendations 5 4.1 Overview of Recommendations............................ 38 PART I: INTRODUCTION ............................... 7 Future Vision .................................................................38 1.1 Overview............................................................... 8 4.2 Land Use and Zoning Recommendations ............ 42 Master Plan Goals ........................................................8 Land Use and Zoning Policies ......................................42 Study Area Overview ....................................................8 Land Use and Zoning Projects ......................................42 PART II: EXISTING CONDITIONS ............... 11 4.3 Urban Design Recommendations ........................ 47 Urban Design Policies ...................................................47 2.1 Community Health ................................................12 Urban Design Projects ..................................................48 2.2 Land Use and Zoning ........................................... 14 4.5 Transportation Recommendations........................ 51 Existing Land Use .........................................................14 Transportation Policies ..................................................51 Future Land Use ...........................................................14 Transportation Projects .................................................53 Existing Zoning .............................................................15 4.6 Housing & Economic 2.3 Urban Design........................................................ 19 Development Recommendations ......................... 56 2.5 Transportation....................................................... 21 Economic Development Policies ...................................56 Roadway Access and Circulation ..................................21 Economic Development Projects ..................................57 Roadway Characteristics ..............................................22 Sidewalks ......................................................................22 PART V: IMPLEMENTATION .........................59 $YHUDJH$QQXDO'DLO\7UDI¿F .........................................22 5.1 Action Plan............................................................ 60 Roadway Level of Service ............................................23 Community Priorities .....................................................60 Crash Locations ............................................................23 Health Focused Funding ...............................................60 MARTA Transit ..............................................................24 Steps Toward Implementation .......................................61 Transportation Sustainability .........................................24 Transportation Action Matrix .........................................62 2.5 Demographics and Markets.................................. 27 Other Project Action Matrix ...........................................63 Market Area Demographic Trends ................................27 Residential Market Overview ........................................28 INDIAN CREEK MARTA STATION AREA STATION MARTA CREEK INDIAN Retail Market Overview .................................................29 2I¿FH0DUNHW2YHUYLHZ .................................................29 Estimated Future Development Potential .....................29 DEKALB HEALTHY COMMUNITIES MASTER PLAN MASTER COMMUNITIES DEKALB HEALTHY Executive Summary October 2013 - DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY To achieve these goals, subareas within DeKalb a quarter of the total study area’s acreage. Overall, County have been organized, with this portion of the mixed land use pattern appears to be healthy Chronic diseases are among the most common the study focusing on the area around the Indian for this area. However, the poor connectivity be- and costly of all health problems in the United Creek MARTA Station. tween residential and other land uses does not States, but they also are among the most prevent- promote activities that lead to a healthy lifestyle. Existing Conditions able. Lack of physical activity and poor nutrition, DeKalb County’s Future Development Map has WZRPRGL¿DEOHULVNIDFWRUVIRUREHVLW\DQGWREDFFR Health related data featured in the report was de- designated most of this area as a Town Center, use are responsible for much of the illness, suf- rived from the Georgia Department of Communi- which may include a variety of land uses of me- 1 fering, and death related to chronic diseases. To ty Health (DBOH), the DeKalb County Board of dium and high density. However, current develop- help address these health issues, the U.S. De- Health, the US Census Bureau and other reputa- ment patterns discourage walking, bicycling, and partment of Health and Human Services (HHS) ble sources. Cardiovascular mortality was found other forms of physical activity as part of daily life. created Communities Putting Prevention to Work to be the number one cause of death in DeKalb (CPPW), which is led by the Centers for Disease County, and residents of the Indian Creek MAR- 2YHUWKHQH[W¿YH\HDUVJURZWKLQWKHPDUNHWDU- Control and Prevention (CDC). TA Station study area fell in the top 20% of the eas and DeKalb County is anticipated to pick up county for diabetes mortality, homicide mortality, slightly (to an average of 0.6 to 0.7 percent per Through these programs, DeKalb County, Geor- year). gia is tackling public health threats throughout and asthma mortality. A summary table is provided its region by creating a Master Active Living Plan below. Market research shows that residential target mar- (MALP). The integration of physical activity and To plan for these health threats, among others, the kets will include empty nesters, young profession- other healthy behaviors into the daily routines of study area’s land use, urban design, transporta- als, small families and workforce housing. Retail DeKalb County residents is the focus of this study. tion and demographic data were analyzed. focus should be on attracting a business mix that By planning communities with a deliberate focus will enhance residents’ ability to make healthy The study area includes a variety of land uses and choices such as fresh groceries, healthy restau- on health, the health and quality-of-life of their res- zoning codes. The Indian Creek MARTA Station, idents can be improved. rants, retailers in an attractive and a walkable which is categorized as Transportation, Communi- HQYLURQPHQW3RWHQWLDORI¿FHVSDFHXVHVLQFOXGH cation and Utilities (TCU) land use, includes about SURIHVVLRQDO VHUYLFHV OHJDO ¿QDQFLDO PHGLFDO Key Health Statistics Mortality due to Injuries (motor vehicles, Injuries (motor vehicles, Cancer Mortality Cardiovascular Mortality Respiratory Diseases pedestrian, homicide) pedestrian, homicide) (DeKalb County) (DeKalb County) (DeKalb County) (DeKalb County) #1 Problem in DeKalb County #2 Problem in DeKalb County #3 Problem in DeKalb County #4 Problem in DeKalb County #5 Problem in DeKalb County Higher infant mortality/low- Diabetes Mortality compared Homicide Mortality com- Asthma Mortality compared to Limited health/dental service er birth weight compared to to DeKalb County pared to DeKalb County DeKalb County area DeKalb County top 20% in DeKalb County top 20% in DeKalb County top 20% in DeKalb County yes no 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Burden of Chronic Diseases and Their Risk Factors: National and State Perspectives 2004. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2004. 2 Master Active Living Plan - Indian Creek MARTA Station October 2013 - DRAFT Executive Summary dental, etc.). Ultimately, the study area’s success • Provide health education programs for all at capturing demand will depend on implementing ages (O-18) a comprehensive development program with a va- • Build partnerships between DeKalb County riety of residential and commercial uses. Board of Health partnerships and local hos- The recommendations that follow have been de- pitals and medical centers to provide mobile veloped to realize a vision that emerged from an health services to residents (O-19) open and inclusive planning process. Throughout • Expand physical exercise programs
Recommended publications
  • Soohueyyap Capstone.Pdf (6.846Mb)

    Soohueyyap Capstone.Pdf (6.846Mb)

    School of City & Regional Planning COLLEGE OF DESIGN A Text-Mining and GIS Approach to Understanding Transit Customer Satisfaction Soo Huey Yap MS-GIST Capstone Project July 24, 2020 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Transit Performance Evaluation……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.2 Using Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis to Measure Customer Satisfaction………… 5 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Site and Transit Authority……………………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.2 Description of Data…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 2.3 Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis 2.3.1 Data Preparation……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.3.2 Determining Most Frequent Words…………………………………………………………… 12 2.3.3 Sentiment Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………. 13 2.4 Open-Source Visualization and Mapping………………………………………………………………… 14 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Determining Most Frequent Words………………………………………………………………………… 16 3.2 Sentiment Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 3.3 Location-based Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 4. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE WORK……………………………………………………………………………………. 24 5. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 25 6. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 7. APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Appendix 1: Final Python Script for Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 2: Results from 1st Round Data Cleaning and Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 3: Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using the NLTK Vader Module Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using TextBlob Appendix 4:
  • Decatur's Transportation Network, 2007

    Decatur's Transportation Network, 2007

    3 • Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 CHAPTER • 3 Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 othing speaks louder of a city’s transportation system than how its residents use it. A public survey conducted as part of the CTP revealed that sixty-seven N percent of commuters drive alone to get to work or school. Over 20 percent of commuters in Decatur either walk, bike or take transit. Even more interesting, 79 percent of residents reported having walked or ridden a bike to downtown Decatur. Additionally, the majority of residents feel that it is easy to get around the City. These results indicate a system that already provides a lot of choice for travelers. The following sections detail the extent of these choices, i.e. the facilities that make up the existing Decatur transportation network. The CTP uses this snapshot of how Decatur gets around in 2007 to recommend how the City can build upon its existing strengths to realize its vision of a healthy and well-connected community. Existing Street Network Streets are where it all comes together for travel in and through Decatur. The streets and their edges provide places for people to walk, bicycle and travel in buses and other vehicles. Compared with the MARTA rail system and off-road paths and greenways, the street system in Decatur accommodates the majority of travel and is detailed below. Roadway Classification in Decatur In 1974, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published the manual Highway Functional Classification - Concepts, Criteria and Procedures. The manual was revised in 1989 and forms the basis of this roadway classification inventory.
  • Dekalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019

    Dekalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019

    DeKalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019 Prepared for Prepared by 1355 Peachtree St. NE Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30309 What is DeKalb County’s Transit Master Plan? The Transit Master Plan’s purpose is to address DeKalb County’s mobility challenges, help to enhance future development opportunities, and improve the quality of life within each of DeKalb County’s cities and unincorporated communities, both north and south. The plan identifies transit service enhancements for today and expansion opportunities for tomorrow to create a 30-year, cost-feasible vision for transit investments in DeKalb County Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 Project Goals ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2 State of DeKalb Transit ................................................................................................. 2-1 History of DeKalb Transit ................................................................................................... 2-1 DeKalb Transit Today .......................................................................................................... 2-2 Current Unmet Rider Needs ............................................................................................

  • System Map a R 14Th St G D Id S

    CUMMING HWY 143 W W IN IN D D W A W KY R A P D R D D AR P P WINDW KY KY KY DWARD P WIN 185 Windward Park & Ride 141 CUMMING HWY MAYFIELD RD N MAIN ST 141 143 W 143 W IN IN D D W A W KY R A P D R D D AR P P WINDW KY KY KY DWARD P 140 WIN ACADEMY ST 185 GA-400 141 Windward Park & Ride MAYFIELD RD N MAIN ST 141 OLD MILTO N PKY 143 OLD 140 M ACADEMY ST GA-400 ILTON PKY OLD MILTO N PKY 185 OLD M S MAIN ST ILTON PKY H A 185 Y O S MAIN ST L H N D A M Y OL E I N D M North Fulton Hospital LT North Fulton Hospital E ILT S O S ON N B PK B P R Y K ID R Y G I E D ALPHARETTA HWY R G D E STATE BRIDGE RD ALPHARETTA HWY R 185 D STATE BRIDGE RD 185 GA-400 140 E GA-400 CR MANSELL RD North Point Mall OS 140 SV ILL ALPHARETTA HWY E R D Mansell Park & Ride WOODSTOCK RD MANSELL RD H O L 141 T C S OM TA B ET B AR RI H DG E LP E GA-400 A R 140 CR MANSELL RD North Point Mall D 143 OS CANTON ST S M V A IL ALPHARETTA HWY GN L OLIA ST HO E LCOM R T B B S RID D GE R 85 A D Mansell Park & Ride T N A MANSELL RD L WOODSTOCK RD T A HO H L CO O M B 141 MARIETTA HWY L B RIVERSIDE RD R C ATLA ID T O S N G S TA E M S R A T D TT B E B EA DR AR RI AZAL H DG LP E GA-400 A R 140 D 143 CANTON ST ROSWELL RD GA-400 M D A u G nw N oo O ST H 87 d LIA O y P LCOM L T B B S RID GE R 85 A D 85 T N A IDGE RD L NORTHR T A HO PITTS RD LC R O G D M DIN DUNWOODY CLUB DR AL B SP MARIETTA HWY B RIVERSIDE RD R ROBERTS DR L ID S AT AN G T E A ST R 87 D R D G IN 85 LD AZALEA DR SPA RD FERRY JETT D DALRYMPLE R D LE R D ALRYMP 143 D R NON 87 141 VER 140 MT 185 RD NON MT VER Georgia Perimeter College
  • Served Proposed Station(S)

    Served Proposed Station(S)

    CURRENT PROPOSED ROUTE NAME JURISDICTION PROPOSED MODIFICATION STATION(S) STATION(S) SERVED SERVED Discontinue Service -N ew proposed Routes 21 and 99 would provide service along Jesse Hill Ave., Coca Cola Pl. and Piedmont Ave. segments. New proposed Route 99 would provide service along the Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr. segment. New proposed Routes 32 and 51 would provide service on Marietta St. between Forsyth St. and Ivan Allen Jr. Blvd. New proposed Route 12 would provide service on the Howell Mill Rd segment between 10th St. and Marietta Chattahoochee Ave.. New proposed Route 37 would provide service on Chattahoochee Ave. between Hills Ave. and Marietta Blvd and Marietta Blvd City of Atlanta, 1 Boulevard/Centennial between Bolton Dr. and Coronet Way. New proposed Routes 37 and 60 would provide service on Coronet Way between Marietta Blvd and Bolton Rd Georgia State Fulton County Olympic Park segments. Service will no longer be provided on Edgewood Ave. between Piedmont Ave. and Marietta St.; Marietta St. between Edgewood Ave. and Forsyth St.; Marietta St. between Ivan Allen, Jr. Blvd and Howell Mill Rd; Howell Mill Rd between Marietta St. and 10th St.; Huff Rd, Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Marietta Blvd; Chattahoochee Ave. between Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Hill Ave.; Bolton Pl., Bolton Dr.; Coronet Way between Defoors Ferry Rd and Moores Mill Rd, and Moores Mill Rd between Bolton Rd and Coronet Way. Proposed modification includes Route 2 operate from Inman Park station via Moreland Ave. (currently served by Route 6-Emory) Freedom Parkway and North Avenue, North Avenue City of Atlanta, 2 Ponce De Leon Avenue Ralph McGill Blvd (currently served by Route 16-Noble), continuing via Blvd,and North Ave.
  • I-20 East Corridor Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA)

    I-20 East Corridor Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA)

    I-20 East Locally Preferred Alternative Summary Report I-20 East Locally Preferred Alternative Summary Report Contents Tables The Adopted LPA 1 Table 1: Reasons for Selection of LPA 3 Refinements to the Recommended LPA 1 Table 2: Goals and Objectives 8 Proposed LPA Operations 4 Table 3: Tier 1Alternatives 8 Adoption of the LPA 4 Table 4: Tier 1 Screening Results 10 Project Description and Background 6 Table 5: Tier 2 Alternatives 11 FTA Project Development Process 6 Table 6: Cost and Performance Comparison of Tier 2 Alternatives 13 Purpose and Need 7 Table 7: Assumptions 13 Goals and Objectives 8 Table 8: Tier 2 Evaluation Matrix 14 Alternatives Evaluation Framework 8 Table 9: Public Involvement 15 Tier 1 Screening 8 Tier 2 Screening 11 Figures Stakeholder and Public Involvement 15 Moving Forward: Challenges and Opportunities to Implementing the LPA 16 Figure 1: Adopted LPA (HRT3) 1 Figure 2: Map of the Adopted LPA – HRT3 2 Figure 3: LPA Operation in MARTA System 4 Figure 4: System Integration Map 5 Figure 5: Study Area 6 Figure 6: Timeline of Previous Studies 6 Figure 7: FTA Project Development Process 7 Figure 8: The Alternatives Analysis Process 8 Figure 9: Tier 1 Alternatives 9 Figure 10: Transit Technologies Considered 11 Figure 11: Tier 2 Alternatives 12 1 I-20 East Locally Preferred Alternative Summary Report Following a two-tiered Detailed Corridor Analysis (DCA), which evaluated a FIGURE 1: ADOPTED LPA (HRT3) variety of transit alignments and modes, the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Heavy Rail Transit (HRT) Authority (MARTA) I-20 East Transit Initiative has selected and refined a Locally Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Preferred Alternative (LPA).
  • VHB Place: Dekalb County Planning

    VHB Place: Dekalb County Planning

    Agenda Date: February 6, 2019 VHB Prepared By: DeKalb County Planning and Transit & Land Use Sustainability Department Charrette/Stakeholder Place: (Multipurpose Room, 330 W. Meeting: Advisory Committee Ponce de Leon Avenue Decatur, Meeting #3 GA 30030) DeKalb County Transit Project No.: 63278.00 Project Name: Master Plan AGENDA ITEMS TIME 1. Registration and Open House 2:00 PM 2. Welcome………………………….………………………………….Commissioner Jeff Rader 2:15 PM 3. Background Presentations 2:20 PM • DeKalb County Transit Master Plan.……..Grady Smith & Laura Everitt, VHB • Principles of Transit Oriented Development………….……Curt Ostradka, VHB • DeKalb County Land Use & Development Baseline…………………………. Jonathan Gelber, Bleakly Advisory Group 4. Break 3:30 PM 5. Overview & Instructions for Break Out Session……………..Olen Daelhousen 3:40 PM 6. Facilitated Break Out Sessions 3:50 PM 7. Break 5:30 PM 8. Town Hall Group Reports……………………..Designated Group Spokesperson 5:45 PM 9. Wrap Up…………………….......…...................................................................Grady Smith 6:45 PM Transit and Land Use Charrette/ Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #3 February 6, 2019 No Boundaries–Today’s Preparation, Tomorrow’s Achievement Meeting Objectives Charrette □ Welcome □ DeKalb County Transit Master Plan □ Transportation Conditions □ Transit Modes □ Principles of Transit Oriented Development □ Economic Development □ Breakout Exercise □ Town Hall □ Next Steps No Boundaries–Today’s Preparation, Tomorrow’s Achievement Welcome DeKalbTransitMasterPlan.com Opening Remarks Jeff
  • Suggestions for Exploring Atlanta on Your Own

    Suggestions for Exploring Atlanta on Your Own

    Suggestions for Exploring Atlanta on Your Own Atlanta CityPASS You can purchase a CityPASS that gets you admission to multiple attractions at a discounted rate. A CityPASS allows you entrance to: Georgia Aquarium Inside CNN Studio Tour World of Coca-Cola Zoo Atlanta OR Center for Civil and Human Rights Fernbank Museum OR College Football Hall of Fame A CityPASS is $73.25 for adults and $59.35 for children ages 3-12. You can find additional information here http://www.citypass.com/atlanta Arts: High Museum of Art: Visit the South’s leading art museum! Discover both classic and modern artists such as Monet and Rothko, and the celebrated architecture by Richard Meier and Renzo Piano (Closed on Mondays). http://www.high.org/ During the MBACSEA conference there will be an Eric Carle exhibit http://www.high.org/Art/Exhibitions/Eric-Carle . The exhibit will feature more than 80 of Carle’s signature collages from 15 of his most popular books that span his nearly 50- year career, including many original works rarely on view. He is the creator of ”The Very Hungry Caterpillar”. There will also be an exhibit on the history of sneakers http://www.high.org/Art/Exhibitions/Sneaker-Culture Transportation: Parking deck is $10 from 7am to 5 pm on weekdays. The High is located directly across the street from the MARTA Arts Center (N5) station. Exit the station at the top level and follow signs to the Museum. Cost: $19.50 for an adult’s ticket. Michael C. Carlos Museum: Located on the beautiful campus at Emory University, the Carlos Museum features an exquisite collection of Ancient American, African, and Classical art.
  • Atlanta Beltline Quarterly Briefing Q1 2014

    Atlanta Beltline Quarterly Briefing Q1 2014

    // Atlanta BeltLine Quarterly Briefing First Quarter // March 3, 2014 3/4/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 1 // Agenda • Welcome • Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Update . Parks, Trails, Transit . Art & Design • Atlanta BeltLine Partnership Update • 2030 Strategic Implementation Plan • Q & A 3/4/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 2 // Where is the Atlanta BeltLine? • In the heart of the Atlanta region • Connects many of Atlanta’s cultural destinations • Utilizes historic freight rail rights of way around the center of town 3/4/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 3 // Opportunity for Significant Impact • Connects 45 neighborhoods • 22% of City of Atlanta population lives in the planning area • 19% of the City’s land mass is inside the planning area • 40% increase in Atlanta’s parkland • 6,500 acre TAD 3/4/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 4 // The Atlanta BeltLine: Key Elements 22 MILES 1,300 ACRES of Transit & of Greenspace Transportation Infrastructure 33 MILES Jobs & Economic of Trails Development 5,600 UNITS of Affordable Historic Workforce Preservation Housing 1,100 ACRES Streetscapes & of Environmental Public Art Clean-up 3/4/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 5 // Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. First Quarter 2014 March 3, 2013 // Recent Activities 3/4/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 6 // Parks: Urban Agriculture Project • Site Preparation Underway . Mass grading completed . Gravel road installed . Stormwater bioswales installed . Landscape plantings in late February . Trees Atlanta South Orchard this Spring • Farmer Request for
  • Transportation Investment Act Final Report ‐ Approved Investment List Atlanta Roundtable Region

    Transportation Investment Act Final Report ‐ Approved Investment List Atlanta Roundtable Region

    Transportation Investment Act Final Report ‐ Approved Investment List Atlanta Roundtable Region CHEROKEE FULTON Prepared by: GWINNETT COBB Atlanta Regional Commission DEKALB In collaboration with: DOUGLAS Atlanta Georgia De partment of Transportation FULTON CLAYTON HENRY FAYETTE Submittal date: October 15, 2011 Transportation Investment Act Final Report – Approved Investment List Atlanta Roundtable Region TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview of the Transportation Investment Act ......................................................................................... 1 Atlanta Regional Roundtable Process .......................................................................................................... 3 Public Involvement Process ......................................................................................................................... 4 Final Investment List and Project Costs ....................................................................................................... 6 Anticipated Project Schedules ..................................................................................................................... 6 Projected Revenue ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Next Steps .................................................................................................................................................... 8 APPENDICES Appendix A: Final Investment List Appendix B: Project Fact Sheets Appendix
  • I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Project Fact Sheet | November 2014

    I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Project Fact Sheet | November 2014

    I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Project Fact Sheet | November 2014 THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION The Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) is The I-20 East Transit Initiative was initiated in 2010 with a undertaking the I-20 East Transit Initiative to study new public Detailed Corridor Analysis (DCA), which built upon previous transportation service east into DeKalb County. The study area planning work undertaken in the corridor. The DCA involved for the I-20 East Initiative extends east from downtown Atlanta a two-tier screening process to evaluate alternatives and to the Mall at Stonecrest in southeastern DeKalb County. resulted in the April 2012 adoption by the MARTA Board of Directors of a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) consisting of The project is intended to improve east-west mobility and two projects: 1) new Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) service operating improve accessibility to residential areas and employment between the MARTA Five Points rail station along I-20 to a new centers along the I-20 corridor east of the City of Atlanta, transit station at Wesley Chapel Road; and 2) an extension of provide convenient and efficient transit service to accommo- the MARTA rail system from the Indian Creek Station south to date the increasing transit demands within the corridor, and Wesley Chapel Road and east to a new station at the Mall at support economic development and revitalization. Expanded Stonecrest. MARTA proposes to implement the LPA in phases, transit service in the I-20 corridor will close an important gap with BRT constructed first followed by the Heavy Rail Transit in the MARTA system for the citizens of the City of Atlanta and (HRT) extension project.
  • MARTA Opens Two Morestations

    MARTA Opens Two Morestations

    Published for the Employees of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority June/July, 1993 MARTA Opens Two MoreStations n Saturday, stations mark the end of new rail ceremonial ribbon cutting will take from local government officials and June 26, 1993, openings for several years to come. place. Participants will board a friends o f MARTA. MARTA will The festivities will begin at specially decorated train eastbound MARTA Man will make a open Kensing­ Kensington Station at 9 a.m. A to our first station located outside special appearance, rollin' along on ton and continental breakfast buffet and 1-285, Indian Creek Station. his roller blades. A special booklet, Indian Creek music by pianist Van Craven will At 9:45 a.m. guests will enjoy “MARTA: Reaching New Stations. Located on the end of set the tone for this celebration. Caribbean fare with music by a Boundaries,” has been developed the East Line between Avondale After remarks by local community steel drum band. The Indian Creek for the station opening and will be and Stone Mountain, these two leaders and elected officials, the Station will be opened with help given out to everyone attending the ceremonies. Kids can enjoy taking home balloons. MARTA Named Safest Following the station openings on June 26, rides will be Transit System in U.S.! free for the balance o f the day, to all persons entering the two new ARTA has safety record and program for operations, we logged 13,494,000 stations. And for those boarding won the 1992 receives the Silver Award. miles in 1992 with only one buses to and from Kensington William T.