DOCSLIB.ORG

TIA 2010 Unconstrained Project Listing MODIFIED TRS 061011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TIA 2010 Unconstrained Project Listing MODIFIED TRS 061011 Transportation Investment Act of 2010 Northwest Georgia Region Unconstrained Project List - Sorted by Project ID Funding Request from Submittal Project Project ID Project Name (Under Review) Type County RC01-000012 Northwest Coordinated Rural/Human Services Transit Project No Info Available Transit Bartow RC01-000041 Chattooga Transit Station No Info Available Transit Chattooga RC01-000061 Rome Transit Department-Operations No Info Available Transit Floyd RC01-000117 GRTA Regional Vanpool Service - Northwest Georgia Region No Info Available Transit Paulding RC01-000123 Paulding County Traffic Control Center (TCC) No Info Available Paulding RC01-000143 Xpress Regional Commuter Service - Northwest Georgia No Info Available Transit Paulding Transportation Investment Act of 2010 Georgia Mountains Region Unconstrained Project List - Sorted by Project ID Funding Request from Submittal Project Project ID Project Name (Under Review) Type County RC02-000017 GRTA Regional Vanpool Service - Georgia Mountains Region No Info Available Transit Forsyth RC02-000062 Xpress Regional Commuter Service - Georgia Mountains No Info Available Transit Forsyth RC02-000078 Habersham Transit-Capital, Operations and Maintenance No Info Available Transit Habersham RC02-000087 Hall County Paratransit Operations-Local Government Matching Funds No Info Available Paratransit Hall RC02-000090 ITS Upgrade - Gainesville/Hall County - GDOT Regional TCC No Info Available Hall RC02-000128 Rabun County Transit Capital-Purchase Buses No Info Available Transit Rabun RC02-000129 Rabun County Transit Operations-Proactive Maintenance Program No Info Available Transit Rabun Transportation Investment Act of 2010 Atlanta Region Unconstrained Project List - Sorted by Project ID Funding Request from Submittal Project Project ID Project Name (Under Review) Type County TIA-AR-001 Georgia Multimodal Passenger Terminal - Property Acquisition and Associated Surface $ 50,000,000 Transit Street Improvements TIA-AR-034 Amtrak Station Relocation $ 38,000,000 Transit TIA-AR-037 MARTA North Heavy Rail Line Extension to SR 140 $ 839,000,000 Transit TIA-AR-041 GRTA Xpress System - Capital and Operations Funding for Existing Services $ 180,100,000 Transit TIA-AR-042 GRTA Xpress System - Capital and Operations Funding for System Expansion $ 316,700,000 Transit TIA-AR-043 Regional Vanpool Program Assistance $ 2,816,000 Transit TIA-AR-044 Regional Mobility Call Center and Enhanced Transportation Services for Older Adults and $ 17,000,000 Transit Persons with Disabilities TIA-AT-003 US 78 (Bankhead Highway / DL Hollowell Boulevard) Bus Rapid Transit Between $ 89,600,000 Transit Bankhead MARTA Station in Atlanta and Douglasville - Includes Roadway Operational Improvements TIA-AT-004 Atlanta Beltline Streetcar Circulator and Trail - Northeast Atlanta to Downtown via $ 234,294,534 Transit Northeast Beltline TIA-AT-005 Atlanta Beltline Streetcar Circulator and Trail - South Buckhead to Midtown via Northeast $ 430,332,485 Transit Beltline TIA-AT-006 Atlanta Beltline Streetcar Circulator and Trail - Southeast Atlanta to Midtown via $ 407,492,936 Transit Southeast Beltline TIA-AT-007 Atlanta Beltline Streetcar Circulator and Trail - Southwest Atlanta to Midtown Circulator $ 508,453,428 Transit TIA-AT-011 SR 54 (Jonesboro Road) from Thirkeld Avenue to Helena Street - Complete Street $ 10,000,000 Bike/Ped Improvements TIA-AT-020 US 23 (Moreland Avenue) Bus Rapid Transit and Operational Improvements between $ 36,000,000 Transit Inman Park / Reynoldstown MARTA Station and Custer Avenue - Includes Roadway Operational Improvements TIA-AT-021A SR 237 (Piedmont Road) / SR 9 (Roswell Road) between Atlanta City Limits and $ 46,000,000 Transit Lindbergh Center MARTA Station - Bus Rapid Transit and Roadway Operational Improvements TIA-AT-021B SR 9 (Roswell Road) / Hammond Drive between Atlanta City Limits and Dunwoody $ 46,000,000 Transit MARTA Station - Bus Rapid Transit and Roadway Operational Improvements TIA-CL-002 Atlanta to Griffin Commuter Rail - Region 3 (Fulton, Clayton and Henry Counties) $ 463,602,270 Transit Clayton Page 3 TIA-CL-006 Clayton County Local Bus / Fixed Route Transit Service $ 182,880,000 Transit Clayton TIA-CL-017 US 19/41 (Tara Boulevard) from Upper Riverdale Road to Justice Center Boulevard - $ 28,426,000 Bike/Ped Clayton Multiuse Path TIA-CO-002 Cobb Community Transit (CCT) - Bus Replacements $ 36,825,000 Transit Cobb TIA-CO-003 Cobb Community Transit (CCT) - Operating Assistance $ 200,000,000 Transit Cobb TIA-CO-008 US 41 (Cobb Parkway) Transit Improvements $ 27,500,000 Transit Cobb TIA-CO-014 KSU to North Atlanta Employment Centers - Express Bus Service $ 15,000,000 Transit Cobb TIA-CO-028 SR 120 (South Marietta Parkway) from US 41 (Cobb Parkway) to Manget Street - $ 13,647,000 Bike/Ped Cobb Medians and Sidewalks TIA-CO-033 Transit Park and Ride Lots in Cobb County $ 32,000,000 Transit Cobb TIA-CO-035 US 41 (Cobb Parkway) Fixed Guideway Transit - Phase 1 from Midtown to Cumberland $ 917,000,000 Transit Cobb TIA-CO-038 US 41 (Cobb Parkway) Fixed Guideway Transit - Phase 2 from Cumberland to Town $ 580,000,000 Transit Cobb Center TIA-DK-005 Dunwoody MARTA Station Area Accessibility Improvements $ 5,350,000 Transit Dekalb TIA-DK-007 Decatur to Clifton Corridor - Transit Connectivity and Safety Improvements $ 10,000,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb TIA-DK-012 Decatur Circulator Shuttle $ 10,000,000 Transit Dekalb TIA-DK-018 SR 13 (Buford Hwy) from Lenox Road to Shallowford Terrace - Pedestrian, Landscape $ 21,884,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb and BRT Improvements TIA-DK-050(1) Various Dekalb County Sidewalk Projects $ 16,425,000 thru -050(26) TIA-DK-050(1) Ashford Dunwoody Road from Windsor Parkway to SR 141 (Peachtree Industrial $ 900,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Boulevard) - Pedestrian Improvements TIA-DK-050(2) Brockett Road from SR 236 (Lavista Road) to Cooledge Road - Pedestrian Improvements $ 900,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb TIA-DK-050(3) Clifton Church Road from Bouldercrest Road to Flat Shoals Road - Pedestrian $ 600,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(4) Eastland Road from US 23 (Moreland Avenue) to Bouldercrest Road - Pedestrian $ 1,850,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(5) Evans Mill Road / Main Street from US 278 (Covington Highway) to Swift Street - $ 650,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Pedestrian Improvements TIA-DK-050(6) Fairington Road from Panola Road to Hillandale Road - Pedestrian Improvements $ 175,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb TIA-DK-050(7) Fayetteville Road from Flat Shoals Road to SR 260 (Glenwood Avenue) - Pedestrian $ 600,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(8) Fayetteville Road from Bouldercrest Road to Flat Shoals Road - Pedestrian $ 520,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements Page 4 TIA-DK-050(9) Fayetteville Road from US 23 (Moreland Avenue) to Key Road - Pedestrian $ 520,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(10) Flakes Mill Road from River Road to McGill Drive - Pedestrian Improvements $ 200,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb TIA-DK-050(11) SR 155 (Flat Shoals Parkway) from Wesley Chapel Road to Boring Road - Pedestrian $ 600,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(12) Henderson Mill Road from Northlake Parkway to Chamblee Tucker Road - Pedestrian $ 1,300,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(13) Linecrest Road from Clark Drive to River Road - Pedestrian Improvements $ 675,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb TIA-DK-050(14) McAfee Road from 2nd Avenue to Columbia Drive - Pedestrian Improvements $ 1,200,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb TIA-DK-050(15) Mercer University Drive from Flowers Road to Henderson Mill Road - Pedestrian $ 650,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(16) Miller Road from Minola Drive to Rock Springs Road - Pedestrian Improvements $ 380,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb TIA-DK-050(17) Miller Road from Snapfinger Woods Drive to Minola Drive - Pedestrian Improvements $ 250,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb TIA-DK-050(18) Northcrest Road from Chamblee Tucker Road to Oakcliff Road - Pedestrian $ 500,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(19) Oak Grove Road from SR 236 (Lavista Road) to Briarcliff Road - Pedestrian $ 300,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(20) Old Johnson Ferry Road from Fulton County Line to Nancy Creek Drive - Pedestrian $ 200,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(21) SR 124 (Rock Chapel Road) from Union Grove Road to Maddox Road - Pedestrian $ 375,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(22) Rockbridge Road from North Clarendon Avenue to North Indian Creek Drive - Pedestrian $ 520,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(23) Shadow Rock Drive from Stone Mountain Lithonia Road to Mystery Valley Drive / Nell $ 810,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Yates Drive - Pedestrian Improvements TIA-DK-050(24) Stephenson Road from South Deshon Road to SR 124 (Rock Chapel Road) - Pedestrian $ 850,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(25) Stephenson Road from Rockbridge Road to South Deshon Road - Pedestrian $ 700,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb Improvements TIA-DK-050(26) The By Way from SR 42 (Briarcliff Road) to Oakdale Road - Pedestrian Improvements $ 200,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb TIA-DK-052 Stone Mountain Lithonia Road from Rockbridge Road to Main Street in Lithonia - Bicycle $ 23,269,220 Bike/Ped Dekalb and Pedestrian Improvements TIA-DK-059 Perimeter Center Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Program $ 1,000,000 Roadway Dekalb TIA-DK-065 Mountain View Road from SR 10 (Memorial Drive) to Sheppard Road - Sidewalks $ 1,285,000 Bike/Ped Dekalb TIA-DO-009 Dorris Road Multiuse Path Phase 1 - Transportation Center to Prestley Mill Road $ 650,000 Bike/Ped Douglas Page 5 TIA-DO-010 Dorris Road Multiuse Path Phase 2 - Prestley
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soohueyyap Capstone.Pdf (6.846Mb)
    School of City & Regional Planning COLLEGE OF DESIGN A Text-Mining and GIS Approach to Understanding Transit Customer Satisfaction Soo Huey Yap MS-GIST Capstone Project July 24, 2020 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Transit Performance Evaluation……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.2 Using Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis to Measure Customer Satisfaction………… 5 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Site and Transit Authority……………………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.2 Description of Data…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 2.3 Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis 2.3.1 Data Preparation……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.3.2 Determining Most Frequent Words…………………………………………………………… 12 2.3.3 Sentiment Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………. 13 2.4 Open-Source Visualization and Mapping………………………………………………………………… 14 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Determining Most Frequent Words………………………………………………………………………… 16 3.2 Sentiment Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 3.3 Location-based Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 4. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE WORK……………………………………………………………………………………. 24 5. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 25 6. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 7. APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Appendix 1: Final Python Script for Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 2: Results from 1st Round Data Cleaning and Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 3: Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using the NLTK Vader Module Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using TextBlob Appendix 4:
    [Show full text]
  • Decatur's Transportation Network, 2007
    3 • Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 CHAPTER • 3 Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 othing speaks louder of a city’s transportation system than how its residents use it. A public survey conducted as part of the CTP revealed that sixty-seven N percent of commuters drive alone to get to work or school. Over 20 percent of commuters in Decatur either walk, bike or take transit. Even more interesting, 79 percent of residents reported having walked or ridden a bike to downtown Decatur. Additionally, the majority of residents feel that it is easy to get around the City. These results indicate a system that already provides a lot of choice for travelers. The following sections detail the extent of these choices, i.e. the facilities that make up the existing Decatur transportation network. The CTP uses this snapshot of how Decatur gets around in 2007 to recommend how the City can build upon its existing strengths to realize its vision of a healthy and well-connected community. Existing Street Network Streets are where it all comes together for travel in and through Decatur. The streets and their edges provide places for people to walk, bicycle and travel in buses and other vehicles. Compared with the MARTA rail system and off-road paths and greenways, the street system in Decatur accommodates the majority of travel and is detailed below. Roadway Classification in Decatur In 1974, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published the manual Highway Functional Classification - Concepts, Criteria and Procedures. The manual was revised in 1989 and forms the basis of this roadway classification inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • MARTA Jurisdictional Briefing City of Atlanta
    MARTA Jurisdictional Briefing City of Atlanta October 10, 2018 Jeffrey A. Parker | General Manager/CEO PRESENTATION OVERVIEW • More MARTA Atlanta Program / Approved Plan • State of Service • Ongoing Coordination Issues • Q & A 2 MORE MARTA ATLANTA PROGRAM / APPROVED PLAN MORE MARTA ATLANTA PROGRAM • Unanimous Approval by MARTA Board of Directors • $2.7 billion in sales tax over 40 years • Additional public/private funding to be sought • Targeted Investments: 22 Miles - Light Rail Transit (LRT) 14 Miles - Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 26 Miles - Arterial Rapid Transit (ART) 2 New Transit Centers Additional Fixed-Route Bus Service Upgrades to existing Rail Stations • Two Years of Comprehensive Planning and Outreach • Nine Guiding Principles • Opportunities for more transit 4 THE PEOPLE’S PRIORITIES Based on public feedback, MARTA and City leaders refined the program, with emphasis on: Atlanta BeltLine Southeast/Southwest Station Enhancements $570M $600M+ $200M Plan builds out 61% of City‐adopted Includes LRT on Campbellton & SW Includes better access, amenities Atlanta BeltLine Streetcar Plan BeltLine and BRT link to downtown and ADA enhancements Clifton Corridor Downtown/Streetcar Bus System $250M $553M $238M Plus additional $100M contingent Connects BeltLine with downtown Includes more frequent bus on securing other local funding destinations and existing Streetcar service and new circulator routes 5 APPROVED PROGRAM 6 MORE MARTA Program MORE MARTA IMPLEMENTATION TO DATE • MARTA has already responded to public feedback. Since 2017, the
    [Show full text]
  • Dekalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019
    DeKalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019 Prepared for Prepared by 1355 Peachtree St. NE Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30309 What is DeKalb County’s Transit Master Plan? The Transit Master Plan’s purpose is to address DeKalb County’s mobility challenges, help to enhance future development opportunities, and improve the quality of life within each of DeKalb County’s cities and unincorporated communities, both north and south. The plan identifies transit service enhancements for today and expansion opportunities for tomorrow to create a 30-year, cost-feasible vision for transit investments in DeKalb County Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 Project Goals ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2 State of DeKalb Transit ................................................................................................. 2-1 History of DeKalb Transit ................................................................................................... 2-1 DeKalb Transit Today .......................................................................................................... 2-2 Current Unmet Rider Needs ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit Contract and Assistance Agreement and Amendments
    RAPID TRANSIT CONTRACT AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENTS Amendment Effective Date Description 1 December 21, 1973 Relocation of Vine City Station, addition of Techwood Station, and changing Tucker-North DeKalb Busway to rapid rail line 2 April 15, 1974 Consolidation of Piedmont Road and Lindbergh Drive Stations into one station 3 August 21,1974 Relocation of Northside Drive Station 4 October 10, 1978 Addition of Airport Station 5 September 1, 1979 Construction Priorities mandated by Legislation 6 May 27, 1980 Permits extension of System into Clayton County and waives “catch-up” payments 7 October 1, 1980 Relocation of Fairburn Road Station 8 June 1, 1983 Construction Priorities 9 May 11, 1987 Realignment of East Line between Avondale Yard and Kensington Station, deletion of North Atlanta busway and addition of North Line, and modification of Proctor Creek Line 10 March 14, 1988 Relocation of Doraville Station 11 August 29, 1990 Extension of the Northeast Line to and within Gwinnett County 12 April 24, 2007 Extended sales tax through June 30, 2047 and added West Line BRT Corridor, I-20 East BRT Corridor, Beltline Rail Corridor and Clifton Corridor rail segment 13 November 5, 2008 Amended I-20 East Corridor from BRT to fixed guideway; added Atlanta Circulation Network; extended fixed guideway segment north along Marietta Blvd; extended the North Line to Windward Parkway; added a fixed guideway segment along the Northern I-285 Corridor in Fulton and DeKalb Counties; extended the Northeast Line to the DeKalb County Line 14 December
    [Show full text]
  • Served Proposed Station(S)
    CURRENT PROPOSED ROUTE NAME JURISDICTION PROPOSED MODIFICATION STATION(S) STATION(S) SERVED SERVED Discontinue Service -N ew proposed Routes 21 and 99 would provide service along Jesse Hill Ave., Coca Cola Pl. and Piedmont Ave. segments. New proposed Route 99 would provide service along the Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr. segment. New proposed Routes 32 and 51 would provide service on Marietta St. between Forsyth St. and Ivan Allen Jr. Blvd. New proposed Route 12 would provide service on the Howell Mill Rd segment between 10th St. and Marietta Chattahoochee Ave.. New proposed Route 37 would provide service on Chattahoochee Ave. between Hills Ave. and Marietta Blvd and Marietta Blvd City of Atlanta, 1 Boulevard/Centennial between Bolton Dr. and Coronet Way. New proposed Routes 37 and 60 would provide service on Coronet Way between Marietta Blvd and Bolton Rd Georgia State Fulton County Olympic Park segments. Service will no longer be provided on Edgewood Ave. between Piedmont Ave. and Marietta St.; Marietta St. between Edgewood Ave. and Forsyth St.; Marietta St. between Ivan Allen, Jr. Blvd and Howell Mill Rd; Howell Mill Rd between Marietta St. and 10th St.; Huff Rd, Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Marietta Blvd; Chattahoochee Ave. between Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Hill Ave.; Bolton Pl., Bolton Dr.; Coronet Way between Defoors Ferry Rd and Moores Mill Rd, and Moores Mill Rd between Bolton Rd and Coronet Way. Proposed modification includes Route 2 operate from Inman Park station via Moreland Ave. (currently served by Route 6-Emory) Freedom Parkway and North Avenue, North Avenue City of Atlanta, 2 Ponce De Leon Avenue Ralph McGill Blvd (currently served by Route 16-Noble), continuing via Blvd,and North Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Creek Marta Station Area Executive Summary 2
    DEKALB COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH Master Active Living Plan INDIANINDIAN CREEK CREEK MARTAMARTA STATION STATION March 2013 October 2013 - DRAFT DeKalb County Board of Commissioners Elaine Boyer Jeff Rader Larry Johnson Sharon Sutton Lee May Kathie Gannon Stan Watson Management Team Andrew A. Baker, AICP DeKalb County Planning & Sustainability, Associate Director Shawanna N. Qawiy, MPA, MSCM DeKalb County Planning & Sustainability, Project Manager Sidney E. Douse, III, AICP DeKalb County Planning & Sustainability, Land Use Planner Planning Team Tunnell-Spangler-Walsh & Associates Grice Consulting Group Fox Environmental Graham and Associates Designing4Health Marketek Inc SL King Technologies, Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................2 PART III: PUBLIC PROCESS ..........................31 Community Health Recommendations .........................3 3.1 Process Overview................................................. 32 Land Use Recommendations ........................................4 Health Questionnaire ....................................................34 Urban Design Recommendations .................................4 Transportation Recommendations ................................5 PART IV: RECOMMENDATIONS .................. 37 Housing & Economic Development Recommendations 5 4.1 Overview of Recommendations............................ 38 PART I: INTRODUCTION ............................... 7 Future Vision .................................................................38 1.1 Overview..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I-20 East Corridor Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA)
    I-20 East Locally Preferred Alternative Summary Report I-20 East Locally Preferred Alternative Summary Report Contents Tables The Adopted LPA 1 Table 1: Reasons for Selection of LPA 3 Refinements to the Recommended LPA 1 Table 2: Goals and Objectives 8 Proposed LPA Operations 4 Table 3: Tier 1Alternatives 8 Adoption of the LPA 4 Table 4: Tier 1 Screening Results 10 Project Description and Background 6 Table 5: Tier 2 Alternatives 11 FTA Project Development Process 6 Table 6: Cost and Performance Comparison of Tier 2 Alternatives 13 Purpose and Need 7 Table 7: Assumptions 13 Goals and Objectives 8 Table 8: Tier 2 Evaluation Matrix 14 Alternatives Evaluation Framework 8 Table 9: Public Involvement 15 Tier 1 Screening 8 Tier 2 Screening 11 Figures Stakeholder and Public Involvement 15 Moving Forward: Challenges and Opportunities to Implementing the LPA 16 Figure 1: Adopted LPA (HRT3) 1 Figure 2: Map of the Adopted LPA – HRT3 2 Figure 3: LPA Operation in MARTA System 4 Figure 4: System Integration Map 5 Figure 5: Study Area 6 Figure 6: Timeline of Previous Studies 6 Figure 7: FTA Project Development Process 7 Figure 8: The Alternatives Analysis Process 8 Figure 9: Tier 1 Alternatives 9 Figure 10: Transit Technologies Considered 11 Figure 11: Tier 2 Alternatives 12 1 I-20 East Locally Preferred Alternative Summary Report Following a two-tiered Detailed Corridor Analysis (DCA), which evaluated a FIGURE 1: ADOPTED LPA (HRT3) variety of transit alignments and modes, the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Heavy Rail Transit (HRT) Authority (MARTA) I-20 East Transit Initiative has selected and refined a Locally Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Preferred Alternative (LPA).
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Region's Plan RTP (2020) PROJECT FACT SHEET AR-411
    AR-411 Atlanta Region's Plan RTP (2020) PROJECT FACT SHEET Short Title CLIFTON CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT - PHASE 1 FROM LINDBERGH MARTA STATION TO EMORY UNIVERSITY GDOT Project No. N/A Federal ID No. N/A Status Long Range Service Type Transit / Rail Capital Sponsor MARTA Jurisdiction Regional - Central Analysis Level In the Region's Air Quality Conformity Analysis Existing Thru Lane N/A LCI Network Year 2040 Planned Thru Lane N/A Flex Corridor Length 6 miles Detailed Description and Justification This project will construct light rail service along the Clifton Corridor from the Lindbergh MARTA station to the Emory University/CDC campus along existing rail corridors. This includes provisions for both heavy rail and light rail service to meet the complex travel patterns and needs within the service corridor as identified within the Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative - Alternatives Analysis (AA). The project includes construction of 6, possibly 7, light rail stations and 4.24 miles of bi-directional trackage and auxiliary infrastructure, as well as the provision of feeder and circulator bus service. This provides high capacity transit mobility options for residents and commuters traveling between Lindbergh Center, the Emory University Main Campus and Clairmont Campus and the Centers for Disease Control Roybal Campus. Further, the project will provide long distance travelers approaching the Clifton Corridor from points along the Gold line or Red line with rail service into the Emory/CDC complex, which serves the travel demand patterns as
    [Show full text]
  • Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative
    Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative Briefing to Emory Grove Neighborhood March 15, 2016 Neighborhood Concerns and Requests • Provide a general overview and background of the project • What are the different alignment alternatives in this area? • How would the Emory Grove district be impacted by the project? Slide 2 Project Background & Description Slide 3 Purpose and Need Improved transit access to growing employment and population Improved connectivity to MARTA rail Improved connectivity within Clifton Corridor Emergency evacuation Slide 4 Planning Process Alternatives Analysis (AA) 2009 Identified a preferred alternative Identified Design Options – Phase 1 2013 Addressed outstanding issues from the AA Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) – Phase 2 2014 Starts the federal process for implementation Slide 5 LPA: LRT-1 Alignment Slide 6 LPA Evolution • Issues • Tunnel costs • Cost per rider high • Revised LPA • Alignment – refined to meet design criteria • Tunnel – longer tunnel required • Alternative Alignments Developed • To reduce costs, increase ridership, and improve cost-effectiveness • To be cost competitive for FTA funding • Revised LPA and At-Grade Alignment – Advance to EIS • At-grade alternative – reduces cost by approx. 40% • Not a significant difference in ridership between alternatives Slide 7 Light Rail Transit (LRT) Slide 8 What is Light Rail Transit? • Flexibility: Operates along roadways typically in exclusive lanes, or dedicated guideways at ground level, elevated, or underground. • Capacity: Up to 3-car trains possible, service every 5 to 15 minutes typically • Operations: Stops typically every ½-mile, but closer in downtown or activity centers • Stations/Stops: simple stations with center or Light Rail in a dedicated guideway (Charlotte) sidewalk-level platforms. Light rail operating with the roadway (Houston) • Power system: Electric power is generally via overhead wires, rather than by third rail.
    [Show full text]
  • VHB Place: Dekalb County Planning
    Agenda Date: February 6, 2019 VHB Prepared By: DeKalb County Planning and Transit & Land Use Sustainability Department Charrette/Stakeholder Place: (Multipurpose Room, 330 W. Meeting: Advisory Committee Ponce de Leon Avenue Decatur, Meeting #3 GA 30030) DeKalb County Transit Project No.: 63278.00 Project Name: Master Plan AGENDA ITEMS TIME 1. Registration and Open House 2:00 PM 2. Welcome………………………….………………………………….Commissioner Jeff Rader 2:15 PM 3. Background Presentations 2:20 PM • DeKalb County Transit Master Plan.……..Grady Smith & Laura Everitt, VHB • Principles of Transit Oriented Development………….……Curt Ostradka, VHB • DeKalb County Land Use & Development Baseline…………………………. Jonathan Gelber, Bleakly Advisory Group 4. Break 3:30 PM 5. Overview & Instructions for Break Out Session……………..Olen Daelhousen 3:40 PM 6. Facilitated Break Out Sessions 3:50 PM 7. Break 5:30 PM 8. Town Hall Group Reports……………………..Designated Group Spokesperson 5:45 PM 9. Wrap Up…………………….......…...................................................................Grady Smith 6:45 PM Transit and Land Use Charrette/ Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #3 February 6, 2019 No Boundaries–Today’s Preparation, Tomorrow’s Achievement Meeting Objectives Charrette □ Welcome □ DeKalb County Transit Master Plan □ Transportation Conditions □ Transit Modes □ Principles of Transit Oriented Development □ Economic Development □ Breakout Exercise □ Town Hall □ Next Steps No Boundaries–Today’s Preparation, Tomorrow’s Achievement Welcome DeKalbTransitMasterPlan.com Opening Remarks Jeff
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit
    MARTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OCTOBER 4, 2018 TODAY’S AGENDA o Key driver of the program o Recommended plan o Project summaries o Next steps 2 KEY DRIVER: PUBLIC INPUT o Atlanta City Design o Atlanta’s Transportation Plan o Atlanta BeltLine Streetcar System Plan o City of Atlanta & More MARTA Atlanta Guiding Principles o 2016 City Council vote on $11.5B project list o November 2016 sales tax referendum o Ongoing Leadership Meetings with Mayor & City Council 3 RECOMMENDED PLAN 4 RECOMMENDED PLAN 5 KEY CHANGES TO THE PLAN o Accelerate Light Rail on Campbellton Road o Invest $350M in Clifton Corridor. Develop partnerships with key stakeholders to deliver the project o Increase investment in existing station enhancements. Augment with existing capital program o Invest $200M more in the Atlanta BeltLine and Streetcar network o Develop a P3 or innovative funding strategy to maximize investment in the BeltLine and Streetcar network 6 CONCEPTUAL PROGRAM ESTIMATES Transit Mode Capital Costs O&M Costs Total Costs Local Match LRT $1,909,600,000 $886,000,000 $2,795,600,000 $1,622,450,000 Reserve for BeltLine Programming - - - $200,000,000 BRT $337,800,000 $96,000,000 $433,800,000 $324,750,000 ART $64,200,000 $38,000,000 $102,200,000 $90,800,000 Frequent Local Bus $ - $340,000,000 $340,000,000 $238,000,000 General Amenities $25,000,000 $ - $25,000,000 $25,000,000 Transit Centers $7,000,000 $ - $7,000,000 $7,000,000 Station Enhancements $200,000,000 $ - $200,000,000 $200,000,000 Total $3,903,600,000* $2,708,000,000 *Federal funding and farebox recovery will
    [Show full text]