DOCSLIB.ORG

Dekalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dekalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019 DeKalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019 Prepared for Prepared by 1355 Peachtree St. NE Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30309 What is DeKalb County’s Transit Master Plan? The Transit Master Plan’s purpose is to address DeKalb County’s mobility challenges, help to enhance future development opportunities, and improve the quality of life within each of DeKalb County’s cities and unincorporated communities, both north and south. The plan identifies transit service enhancements for today and expansion opportunities for tomorrow to create a 30-year, cost-feasible vision for transit investments in DeKalb County Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 Project Goals ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2 State of DeKalb Transit ................................................................................................. 2-1 History of DeKalb Transit ................................................................................................... 2-1 DeKalb Transit Today .......................................................................................................... 2-2 Current Unmet Rider Needs ............................................................................................. 2-4 Chapter 3 Approach ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 Technical Process .................................................................................................................. 3-2 Public Involvement Process .............................................................................................. 3-3 Chapter 4 Project Evaluation ........................................................................................................... 4-1 Overview .................................................................................................................................. 4-1 Project Universe .................................................................................................................... 4-1 Project Evaluation Measures ............................................................................................ 4-6 Project Scoring ....................................................................................................................... 4-10 Chapter 5 Scenario Development ................................................................................................. 5-1 Financial Forecasting ........................................................................................................... 5-1 Scenarios for Consideration.............................................................................................. 5-6 Chapter 6 Scenario Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 6-1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 6-1 Access to Jobs ........................................................................................................................ 6-1 Economic Development ..................................................................................................... 6-9 Ridership Forecast ................................................................................................................ 6-12 Chapter 7 Factors for Success ......................................................................................................... 7-1 Building Momentum ........................................................................................................... 7-1 Building Trust ......................................................................................................................... 7-2 Key Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 7-2 Steps to Implementation ................................................................................................... 7-5 ii Table of Contents Appendix A Public Involvement Documentation .................................................................... A-1 Appendix B Financial Planning Documentation ....................................................................... B-1 Appendix C Ridership Results for ART and High-Capacity Transit Routes .................... C-1 List of Tables Table 4-1 Arterial Rapid Transit (ART) Evaluation Matrix .............................................. 4-11 Table 4-2 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Evaluation Matrix ...................................................... 4-13 Table 4-3 Light Rail Transit (LRT) Evaluation Matrix ....................................................... 4-15 Table 4-4 Heavy Rail Transit (HRT) Evaluation Matrix .................................................... 4-17 Table 5-1 MARTA Act Sales Tax Characteristics ............................................................... 5-3 Table 5-2 HB 930 Sales Tax Characteristics ........................................................................ 5-3 Table 5-3 Half-Penny Scenario Project List ........................................................................ 5-8 Table 5-4 Full-Penny Scenario Project List ......................................................................... 5-10 Table 5-5 Previously Adopted Scenario Project List ....................................................... 5-12 Table 6-1 Economic Development Potential by Scenario ............................................. 6-9 Table 6-2 Modeling Assumptions in Scenarios ................................................................ 6-13 Table 6-3 Estimated 2040 Ridership on Major Projects ................................................ 6-14 Table 6-4 ART Spreadsheet Ridership Model Variables and Factors ....................... 6-15 Table 6-5 Estimated 2040 Ridership on Arterial Rapid Transit Routes .................... 6-16 Table 6-6 2040 Ridership Estimates for Build Scenarios ............................................... 6-16 List of Figures Figure 1-1 DeKalb Transit Master Plan Goals .................................................................... 1-2 Figure 3-1 DeKalb TMP Technical and Public Involvement Processes ..................... 3-1 Figure 3-2 Public Open House ................................................................................................ 3-4 Figure 3-3 Minneapolis Peer City Tour ................................................................................ 3-5 Figure 3-4 Transit and Land Use Visioning Charrette .................................................... 3-6 Figure 3-5 Display Booth at Community Event ................................................................ 3-7 Figure 4-1 Heavy Rail Transit ................................................................................................... 4-4 Figure 4-2 Light Rail Transit ..................................................................................................... 4-4 Figure 4-3 Bus Rapid Transit .................................................................................................... 4-5 Figure 4-4 Arterial Rapid Transit ............................................................................................ 4-5 Figure 4-5 Translating TMP Goals into Project Evaluation Measures ...................... 4-6 iii Table of Contents Figure 5-1 Projected Sales Tax Revenue for Half-Penny and Full-Penny................ 5-4 Figure 6-1 Access to Jobs from South DeKalb Mall ........................................................ 6-3 Figure 6-2 Access to Jobs from Stonecrest Mall .............................................................. 6-4 Figure 6-3 Access to Jobs from Brookhaven ..................................................................... 6-5 Figure 6-4 Access to Jobs from Northlake Mall ............................................................... 6-6 Figure 6-5 Access to Jobs from Downtown Tucker ......................................................... 6-7 Figure 6-6 Access to Jobs from Dunwoody ....................................................................... 6-8 Figure 7-1 Potential Funding Options beyond HB 930 Sales Tax .............................. 7-3 Figure 7-2 Current Unmet Needs .......................................................................................... 7-4 Figure 7-3 Steps to Implementation ..................................................................................... 7-7 List of Maps Map 2-1 Transit Services in DeKalb County ....................................................................... 2-3 Map 2-2 Current Unmet Rider Needs .................................................................................. 2-5 Map 4-1 Universe of Projects .................................................................................................. 4-3 Map 4-2 Economic Development Target Areas ............................................................... 4-8 Map 4-3 Equitable Target Areas ............................................................................................. 4-9 Map 4-4 Arterial Rapid Transit Projects
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wayside Noise of Elevated Rail Transit Structures: Analysis of Published Data and Supplementary Measurements
    HE )8# 5 ORT NO. UMTA-MA-06-0099-80-6 . A3 7 no. DOT- TSC- UMTA- 3n-4i WAYSIDE NOISE OF ELEVATED RAIL TRANSIT STRUCTURES: ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED DATA AND SUPPLEMENTARY MEASUREMENTS Eric E. Unger Larry E. Wittig TRJ < of A , DECEMBER 1980 INTERIM REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared for U,S, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RESFARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION Transportation Systems Center Cambridge MA 02142 x . NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro- ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. i Technical Report Documentation Page 1 . Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. UMTA-MA- 0 6-0099-80-6 4.^Jitle and Subtitle 5. Report Date WAYSIDE NOISE OF ELEVATED RAIL TRANSIT December 1980 STRUCTURES: ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED DATA 6. Performing Organization Code AND SUPPLEMENTARY MEASUREMENTS DTS-331 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author's) DOT-TSC-UMTA-80- 41 linger, Eric E.; Wittig, Larry E. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) UM049/R0701 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.* Moulton Street 11. Contract or Grant No. 50 DOT-TSC Cambridge MA 02238 -1531 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12 U.S. Department of Transportation Interim Report Urban Mass Transportation Administration July 1978-Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • W . Howard Avenue
    19 MONDAY THRU FRIDAY - DE LUNES A VIERNES l Times given for each bus trip from beginning to end of route. Read down for times at specific locations. Horarios para cada viaje de autobús desde el principio hasta el fin del trayecto. Lea los horarios para localidades específicas de arriba hacia a bajo. ño a 19 p s E n itsmarta.com / 404-848-5000 E 2104 Leave: - Salida: East Lake Station Decatur Station V. A. Hospital V. Arrive: - Llegada: Chamblee Station V. A. Hospital V. Clairmont Rd. & Rd. LaVista Clairmont Rd. & Hwy. Buford Leave: - Salida: Chamblee Station Clairmont Rd. & Hwy. Buford Clairmont Rd. & Rd. LaVista Decatur Station Arrive: - Llegada: East Lake Station 2021 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 5 4 3 2 1 24 WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE Accesible para silla de ruedas NORTHBOUND - DIRECCION NORTE SOUTHBOUND - DIRECCION SUR METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY Rail Stations Served: Clairmont Road/ Howard Avenue W. Chamblee Decatur East Lake Effective as of: 04- 5:45 5:53 6:02 6:09 6:20 6:27 5:50 5:57 6:06 6:13 6:24 6:31 6:15 6:23 6:34 6:41 6:52 6:59 6:20 6:28 6:38 6:45 6:56 7:03 6:45 6:53 7:04 7:14 7:27 7:34 6:50 6:58 7:08 7:15 7:29 7:36 7:15 7:24 7:39 7:49 8:02 8:09 7:20 7:28 7:39 7:46 8:00 8:07 7:45 7:54 8:09 8:19 8:30 8:37 + 7:50 7:59 8:10 8:17 8:31 8:38 8:15 8:24 8:39 8:49 9:00 9:07 + 8:20 8:29 8:40 8:47 9:01 9:07 8:45 8:54 9:09 9:18 9:29 9:36 + 8:50 8:59 9:10 9:15 9:29 9:35 9:15 9:24 9:36 9:45 9:56 10:03 + 9:25 9:34 9:44 9:49 10:03 10:09 9:45 9:54 10:06 10:15 10:26 10:33 + 10:05 10:14 10:24 10:29 10:43 10:49 10:25 10:34 10:46 10:55 11:06 11:13
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Area Trans Study.Indd
    piedmont area transportation study final report Several portions of the corridor, such as near the northern and southern activity centers, do have more consistent and attractive streetscape environments. However, other portions existing of the corridor have not received improvements during recent years. This creates a disconnected corridor and provides unattractive and difficult conditions for individuals wishing to walk between the areas with nicer aesthetics and well-kept conditions streetscapes. This discontinuity between areas is even more noticeable to motorists who drive along the corridor. Zoning Structure Portions of the corridor lie within Special Public Interest (SPI) districts which provide an additional layer of zoning. These areas are located on the east side of Piedmont Road north of Peachtree Road as well as on both sides of Above: Recently completed Phase I Peachtree Road Piedmont Road in the Lindbergh Center Complete Streets streetsape area. These overlay districts allow for Right: Lindbergh Center as common goals pertaining to aesthetics, a model of good streetscape attractiveness to all user groups, and unity of appearance in these locations as development occurs. Several areas that are prime for redevelopment are currently not within overlay districts (along the west side of Piedmont Road south and north of Peachtree Road), making them vulnerable to development that does not support the common goals of the corridor. “ … We have worked with the City of Atlanta very closely throughout this process so that our recom- mendations can be put directly into the plan they create for the entire city. That gives Buckhead a fast start on making vital transportation improvements.” 22 23 piedmont piedmont area area transportation transportation study final report study final report 3.0 Existing Conditions The current state of Piedmont Road is the result of decades of substantial use without requisite investment in maintenance and improvement to the transit, pedestrian, bicycle, and roadway infrastructure along the corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • MARTA Tunnel Construction in Decatur, Georgia
    . 4 I lit. 18.5 . a37 no UOT- f SC- UM TM UMTA-MA-06-002 5-77-1 7 7 -2 4 T NO MARTA TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION IN DECATUR GEORGIA— A Case Study of Impacts Peter C. Wolff and Peter H. Scholnick Abt Associates Inc. 55 Wheeler Street Cambridge MA 02138 of TR4 A( JULY 1977 FINAL REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE U.S. PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared for U.S, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION Office of Technology Development and Deployment Office of Rail Technology Washi ngton DC 20591 . NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro- ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1 . Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. UMTA-MA-06-0025- 77-14 4. Title and Subti tie 5. Report Date July 1977 iJfYlTfl- MARTA TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION IN DECATUR GEORGIA— A Case Study of Impacts 6. Performing Organization Code 8. Performing, Organi zation Report No. 7. Authors) DOT-TSC-UMTA-77-24 AAI 77-18 Peter Co Wolff and Peter H. Scholnick 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Abt Associates Inc. UM704/R7706 55 Wheeler Street 11. Contract or Grant No.
    [Show full text]
  • Soohueyyap Capstone.Pdf (6.846Mb)
    School of City & Regional Planning COLLEGE OF DESIGN A Text-Mining and GIS Approach to Understanding Transit Customer Satisfaction Soo Huey Yap MS-GIST Capstone Project July 24, 2020 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Transit Performance Evaluation……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.2 Using Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis to Measure Customer Satisfaction………… 5 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Site and Transit Authority……………………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.2 Description of Data…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 2.3 Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis 2.3.1 Data Preparation……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.3.2 Determining Most Frequent Words…………………………………………………………… 12 2.3.3 Sentiment Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………. 13 2.4 Open-Source Visualization and Mapping………………………………………………………………… 14 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Determining Most Frequent Words………………………………………………………………………… 16 3.2 Sentiment Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 3.3 Location-based Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 4. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE WORK……………………………………………………………………………………. 24 5. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 25 6. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 7. APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Appendix 1: Final Python Script for Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 2: Results from 1st Round Data Cleaning and Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 3: Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using the NLTK Vader Module Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using TextBlob Appendix 4:
    [Show full text]
  • Decatur's Transportation Network, 2007
    3 • Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 CHAPTER • 3 Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 othing speaks louder of a city’s transportation system than how its residents use it. A public survey conducted as part of the CTP revealed that sixty-seven N percent of commuters drive alone to get to work or school. Over 20 percent of commuters in Decatur either walk, bike or take transit. Even more interesting, 79 percent of residents reported having walked or ridden a bike to downtown Decatur. Additionally, the majority of residents feel that it is easy to get around the City. These results indicate a system that already provides a lot of choice for travelers. The following sections detail the extent of these choices, i.e. the facilities that make up the existing Decatur transportation network. The CTP uses this snapshot of how Decatur gets around in 2007 to recommend how the City can build upon its existing strengths to realize its vision of a healthy and well-connected community. Existing Street Network Streets are where it all comes together for travel in and through Decatur. The streets and their edges provide places for people to walk, bicycle and travel in buses and other vehicles. Compared with the MARTA rail system and off-road paths and greenways, the street system in Decatur accommodates the majority of travel and is detailed below. Roadway Classification in Decatur In 1974, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published the manual Highway Functional Classification - Concepts, Criteria and Procedures. The manual was revised in 1989 and forms the basis of this roadway classification inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
    2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2020 This document is the final report as approved and adopted by the City of Brookhaven Mayor and City Council on October 13, 2020. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update Prepared by Prepared for The City of Brookhaven John Arthur Ernst, Jr. – Mayor Linley Jones – City Council District 1 John Park – City Council District 2 Madeleine Simmons – City Council District 3 Joe Gebbia – City Council District 4 Christian Sigman – City Manager Public Works Department Hari Karikaran – Director September 2020 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................................................................I LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................................................................ II CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 REPORT ORGANIZATION .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paratransit Service Rider's Guide
    GWINNETT COUNTY TRANSIT PARATRANSIT SERVICE PARATRANSIT SERVICE RIDER’S GUIDE Customer Service Center 3525 Mall Boulevard Suite 5-C Duluth, GA 30096 Phone: 770.822.5010 Business Hours: Monday – Saturday, 8:00am – 5:00pm PARATRANSIT SERVICE RIDER’S GUIDE 1 | 37 FREQUENTLY CALLED NUMBERS Before calling for the services listed below, please read and become familiar with the applicable sections of this Rider’s Guide for details on the service and when to call. Call 770.418.2336 or TDD at 711 to: • Make Trip Reservations • Change a Scheduled Trip (prior to the day of the trip) • Cancel a Scheduled Trip (prior to the day of the trip) • Request Help with Application Call 770.246.4770 and “press 2” or TDD at 711 for: • Same Day Cancel of a Trip • Where’s My Ride • Inquire about Service Status during Hazardous Weather and Emergency Events • For Medical Offices and Similar Facilities to Notify GCT if Passenger’s Appointment is Running Long Call 770.822.5010 and “press 3” or TDD at 711 for: • General GCT Paratransit Information • Request GCT Paratransit Application • Lost Breeze Paratransit Photo ID Card • Lost Personal Property and Items • Comments, Suggestions and Complaints PARATRANSIT SERVICE RIDER’S GUIDE 2 | 37 This Rider’s Guide is Available in Alternate Formats and/or Languages For persons with visual impairments, the Gwinnett County Transit (GCT) Paratransit Service Rider’s Guide and application can be made available in alternate formats upon request. For persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP), the GCT Paratransit Service Rider’s Guide and application is translated and available in Spanish, Korean, Vietnamese, and Chinese.
    [Show full text]
  • MARTA Jurisdictional Briefing City of Atlanta
    MARTA Jurisdictional Briefing City of Atlanta October 10, 2018 Jeffrey A. Parker | General Manager/CEO PRESENTATION OVERVIEW • More MARTA Atlanta Program / Approved Plan • State of Service • Ongoing Coordination Issues • Q & A 2 MORE MARTA ATLANTA PROGRAM / APPROVED PLAN MORE MARTA ATLANTA PROGRAM • Unanimous Approval by MARTA Board of Directors • $2.7 billion in sales tax over 40 years • Additional public/private funding to be sought • Targeted Investments: 22 Miles - Light Rail Transit (LRT) 14 Miles - Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 26 Miles - Arterial Rapid Transit (ART) 2 New Transit Centers Additional Fixed-Route Bus Service Upgrades to existing Rail Stations • Two Years of Comprehensive Planning and Outreach • Nine Guiding Principles • Opportunities for more transit 4 THE PEOPLE’S PRIORITIES Based on public feedback, MARTA and City leaders refined the program, with emphasis on: Atlanta BeltLine Southeast/Southwest Station Enhancements $570M $600M+ $200M Plan builds out 61% of City‐adopted Includes LRT on Campbellton & SW Includes better access, amenities Atlanta BeltLine Streetcar Plan BeltLine and BRT link to downtown and ADA enhancements Clifton Corridor Downtown/Streetcar Bus System $250M $553M $238M Plus additional $100M contingent Connects BeltLine with downtown Includes more frequent bus on securing other local funding destinations and existing Streetcar service and new circulator routes 5 APPROVED PROGRAM 6 MORE MARTA Program MORE MARTA IMPLEMENTATION TO DATE • MARTA has already responded to public feedback. Since 2017, the
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit Contract and Assistance Agreement and Amendments
    RAPID TRANSIT CONTRACT AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENTS Amendment Effective Date Description 1 December 21, 1973 Relocation of Vine City Station, addition of Techwood Station, and changing Tucker-North DeKalb Busway to rapid rail line 2 April 15, 1974 Consolidation of Piedmont Road and Lindbergh Drive Stations into one station 3 August 21,1974 Relocation of Northside Drive Station 4 October 10, 1978 Addition of Airport Station 5 September 1, 1979 Construction Priorities mandated by Legislation 6 May 27, 1980 Permits extension of System into Clayton County and waives “catch-up” payments 7 October 1, 1980 Relocation of Fairburn Road Station 8 June 1, 1983 Construction Priorities 9 May 11, 1987 Realignment of East Line between Avondale Yard and Kensington Station, deletion of North Atlanta busway and addition of North Line, and modification of Proctor Creek Line 10 March 14, 1988 Relocation of Doraville Station 11 August 29, 1990 Extension of the Northeast Line to and within Gwinnett County 12 April 24, 2007 Extended sales tax through June 30, 2047 and added West Line BRT Corridor, I-20 East BRT Corridor, Beltline Rail Corridor and Clifton Corridor rail segment 13 November 5, 2008 Amended I-20 East Corridor from BRT to fixed guideway; added Atlanta Circulation Network; extended fixed guideway segment north along Marietta Blvd; extended the North Line to Windward Parkway; added a fixed guideway segment along the Northern I-285 Corridor in Fulton and DeKalb Counties; extended the Northeast Line to the DeKalb County Line 14 December
    [Show full text]
  • LAST MILE CONNECTIVITY STUDY Draft Report
    LAST MILE CONNECTIVITY STUDY Draft Report Prepared for Prepared by In collaboration with Last Mile Connectivity Study | DRAFT REPORT February 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Background ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 A. Defining Last Mile Connectivity ....................................................................................................................... 8 B. Study Area ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 3. Study Process/Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 11 A. Prior Plans and Studies .....................................................................................................................................11 B. Project List ..........................................................................................................................................................11 C. Mapping Existing Facilities/Services and Previously Planned/Programmed Projects
    [Show full text]
  • System Map a R 14Th St G D Id S
    CUMMING HWY 143 W W IN IN D D W A W KY R A P D R D D AR P P WINDW KY KY KY DWARD P WIN 185 Windward Park & Ride 141 CUMMING HWY MAYFIELD RD N MAIN ST 141 143 W 143 W IN IN D D W A W KY R A P D R D D AR P P WINDW KY KY KY DWARD P 140 WIN ACADEMY ST 185 GA-400 141 Windward Park & Ride MAYFIELD RD N MAIN ST 141 OLD MILTO N PKY 143 OLD 140 M ACADEMY ST GA-400 ILTON PKY OLD MILTO N PKY 185 OLD M S MAIN ST ILTON PKY H A 185 Y O S MAIN ST L H N D A M Y OL E I N D M North Fulton Hospital LT North Fulton Hospital E ILT S O S ON N B PK B P R Y K ID R Y G I E D ALPHARETTA HWY R G D E STATE BRIDGE RD ALPHARETTA HWY R 185 D STATE BRIDGE RD 185 GA-400 140 E GA-400 CR MANSELL RD North Point Mall OS 140 SV ILL ALPHARETTA HWY E R D Mansell Park & Ride WOODSTOCK RD MANSELL RD H O L 141 T C S OM TA B ET B AR RI H DG E LP E GA-400 A R 140 CR MANSELL RD North Point Mall D 143 OS CANTON ST S M V A IL ALPHARETTA HWY GN L OLIA ST HO E LCOM R T B B S RID D GE R 85 A D Mansell Park & Ride T N A MANSELL RD L WOODSTOCK RD T A HO H L CO O M B 141 MARIETTA HWY L B RIVERSIDE RD R C ATLA ID T O S N G S TA E M S R A T D TT B E B EA DR AR RI AZAL H DG LP E GA-400 A R 140 D 143 CANTON ST ROSWELL RD GA-400 M D A u G nw N oo O ST H 87 d LIA O y P LCOM L T B B S RID GE R 85 A D 85 T N A IDGE RD L NORTHR T A HO PITTS RD LC R O G D M DIN DUNWOODY CLUB DR AL B SP MARIETTA HWY B RIVERSIDE RD R ROBERTS DR L ID S AT AN G T E A ST R 87 D R D G IN 85 LD AZALEA DR SPA RD FERRY JETT D DALRYMPLE R D LE R D ALRYMP 143 D R NON 87 141 VER 140 MT 185 RD NON MT VER Georgia Perimeter College
    [Show full text]