Enhancing the Connectivity of High Speed Rail in the Orlando-Tampa Corridor with Local Public Transportation Systems: Issues and Opportunities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Enhancing the Connectivity of High Speed Rail in the Orlando-Tampa Corridor with Local Public Transportation Systems: Issues and Opportunities Enhancing the Connectivity Of High Speed Rail in the Orlando-Tampa Corridor with Local Public Transportation Systems: Issues and Opportunities January 2011 Final Report DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program and the Florida Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government and the Florida Department of Transportation assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. Enhancing the Connectivity Of High Speed Rail in the Orlando-Tampa Corridor with Local Public Transportation Systems: Issues and Opportunities Final Report Prepared for State of Florida Department of Transportation Public Transit Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 30 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 Project Manager: Nazih Haddad Prepared by (Rob Gregg and Justin Begley) National Center for Transit Research Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) University of South Florida 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, Florida 33620-5375 January 2011 BDK85, RPWO #977-24 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 977-24 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Enhancing the Connectivity of High Speed Rail in the Orlando- January 2011 Tampa Corridor with Local Public Transportation Systems: Issues and Opportunities 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Rob Gregg and Justin Begley 2117-77928-00 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) National Center for Transit Research Center for Urban Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. University of South Florida BDK85, RPWO #977-24 4202 E. Fowler Ave, CUT 100 DTRT07-G-0059 Tampa, FL 33620-5375 2. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Florida Department of Transportation Final Report Office of Public Transportation May 2010 to January 2011 Transit Planning Program Manager 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 605 Suwannee Street, MS 30 Tallahassee FL 32399-0450 Research and Innovative Technology Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Mail Code RDT-30 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Room E33 Washington, D.C. 20590-0001 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract High Speed Rail (HSR) will only be truly transformational if it has effective connections with as many other modes of transportation as possible. This project looks at local public transportation systems that have opportunities to connect to HSR stations planned for the Orlando-Tampa corridor. How will the availability of HSR affect the existing transit services? What approach are local agencies taking to re-align services to benefit both local and regional travelers? The creation and authority of the Florida Rail Enterprise High Speed Rail project is a catalyst for local agencies to reassess their existing and planned public transportation development activities. It is the objective of this project to analyze these local services and plans to provide insight for enhanced interconnectivity opportunities to the planned HSR stations. With effective connections, the High Speed Rail Project can create a public transportation system for much of the state of Florida. 17. Key Word 18. Distribution Statement High speed rail No restrictions 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified Pages 156 This page intentionally left blank. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Tampa to Orlando corridor of Florida High Speed Rail (HSR) is expected to launch in 2015 to much anticipation as what will be the initial line of a national HSR service network. A 2003 market study of the proposed system stated the ‘travel experience is impacted by each contact point’ along an end-to-end HSR trip. It has been publicly argued that currently the least understood element of the Tampa to Orlando HSR line is the viability of connecting ‘to and from’ transportation options. The purpose of this study is to evaluate public transportation services within this corridor and identify opportunities for enhancement of HSR connectivity through mass transit. Prospects for increasing the use of connecting public transportation systems were found to be influenced by HSR station locations and meeting the needs of intercity travelers through provision of convenient and travel time competitive services. Transit Markets and High Speed Rail Station Integration to Local Transit Systems In Chapter 2, background is provided with a look to what has been learned through the operation of international HSR systems. Those existing HSR systems have traditionally catered to business travelers, whereas the projected primary users of the FHSR Phase I line may be a more balanced business/commuter and leisure/recreational trip purpose mix. Central city HSR station locations tend to encourage travel on other transit systems when co- located with high capacity fixed guideway transit (such as local rail) and be more difficult to access by an automobile. As private cars are expected to be the primary competitor to a trip made on HSR, the degree to which station placement discourages use of any segment of an end-to-end HSR trip should not be understated. The costs to bring increased levels of local transit service to a HSR urban core station are typically lower than suburban stations, where less service exists. Walk up and cycling accessibility are more likely to be components of end to end trip utilizing transit than autos and have less potential outside of urban core areas. Two conditions identified for making suburban stations successful include the need to create a connection to a local rail network and to integrate fares, schedules, and information. Factors Affecting the Use of Connecting Bus Service for Intercity Travelers · Availability of express bus services for riders of particular trip purposes · The amount of reduction of travel time between available mode options · Frequency of service, including off-peak, late-night and weekends · Competition with other mode choices in an open market · Pick up and drop off locations adjacent to connecting transportation · Ability to make seamless connections between the two riding platforms · Provision of baggage handling strategies and complementary service Enhancing the Connectivity of HSR in the Orlando-Tampa Corridor vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure ES- 1: Tampa to Orlando HSR Line and Connecting Public Transit Systems viii Enhancing the Connectivity of HSR in the Orlando-Tampa Corridor EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Defining Quality Levels of Transit Service to Future HSR Stations In Chapter 3, existing (2010) transit service levels in the Tampa to Orlando HSR corridor were assessed for how effective they might be to provide trip connectivity. The following criteria for defining a quality connecting service were established: · A quality public transportation connecting route has a matching span of service to HSR · A quality public transportation connecting route serves a HSR station with at least 2 vehicles per hour/30 minute frequency · A quality public transportation connecting route takes passengers to/from their trip generator in no more than 200% of a comparable auto travel trip time · A quality public transportation connecting service should reduce uncertainty and emphasize convenience by eliminating the need for bus-to-bus transfers to reach major trip generators The findings in Chapter 4 concluded that from the three future Orlando area HSR stations served by LYNX, a limited amount of destinations were connected with a relatively high quality of service. Those directly served generators were located primarily south of downtown. Polk County’s existing transit service levels connected few generators with quality service on weekdays and Saturdays while late night and Sunday service was non-existent. Hillsborough County’s transit system, HART, connected more generators with multiple bus lines but had mixed levels of service on late nights and weekends. Year 2015 Public Transportation Systems Level of Service Overview Chapter 5 begins to look forward, as to what future local transit levels of service would be leading up to 2015 and beyond. A major restructuring of LYNX’s fixed route bus services is ongoing in response to a reduction in funding. A Five-Year Service Plan was created with a primary goal of planning the development of premium transit, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and other supporting services in a financially constrained environment. Efforts have been ongoing to unite Lakeland Area Mass Transit District (LAMTD), Winter Haven Area Transit (WHAT) and Polk County Transit Services (PCTS) under a single governing body, the Polk Transit Authority (PTA), to plan and operate all transit services for Polk County. New HSR connecting bus routes have been planned for both the Kathleen Road and Williams DRI site locations. A primary goal for HART through 2015 is to protect core services, which constitute the top 15 performing bus routes in the system. Public Transportation and Long Range Plans Beyond the 2015 line opening date, there is great potential for FHSR to have regional transportation benefit. Today’s supporting transit networks have been conceived to be greatly expanded by transportation planning agencies into multi-county systems connected with commuter rail, light rail, BRT and other bus services to
Recommended publications
  • 2012 Annual Report Pursuing Our Unlimited Potential Annual Report 2012
    For the year ended March 31, 2012 Pursuing Our Unlimited Potential Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2012 EAST JAPAN RAILWAY COMPANY JR East’s Strengths 1 AN OVERWHELMINGLY SOLID AND ADVANTAGEOUS RAILWAY NETWORK The railway business of the JR East Being based in the Tokyo metro- Group covers the eastern half of politan area is a major source of our Honshu island, which includes the strength. Routes originating in the Tokyo metropolitan area. We provide Kanto area (JR East Tokyo Branch transportation services via our Office, Yokohama Branch Office, Shinkansen network, which connects Hachioji Branch Office, Omiya Tokyo with regional cities in five Branch Office, Takasaki Branch directions, Kanto area network, and Office, Mito Branch Office, and intercity and regional networks. Our Chiba Branch Office) account for JR EAST’S SERVICE AREA networks combine to cover 7,512.6 68% of transportation revenue. kilometers and serve 17 million Japan’s total population may be people daily. We are the largest declining, but the population of the railway company in Japan and one of Tokyo metropolitan area (Tokyo, TOKYO the largest in the world. Kanagawa Prefecture, Saitama Prefecture, and Chiba On a daily basis, about 17million passengers travel a network of 70 train lines stretching 7,512.6 operating kilometers An Overwhelmingly Solid and Advantageous Railway Network Annual Report 2012 SECTION 1 OVERALL GROWTH STRATEGY Prefecture) continues to rise, mean- OPERATING REVENUES OPERATING INCOME ing our railway networks are sup- For the year ended March 31, 2012 For the year ended March 31, 2012 ported by an extremely sturdy Others 7.9% Transportation Others 6.1% Transportation operating foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Examination of Passenger Assaults on Bus Transit Systems
    Examination of Passenger Assaults On Bus Transit Systems FDOT Task Work Order #943-26 University Master Agreement BDV25 FINAL REPORT December 2015 PREPARED FOR Florida Department of Transportation Office of Freight, Logistics and Passenger Operations Examination of Passenger Assaults On Bus Transit Systems Final Report Funded By: FDOT Project Manager: Victor Wiley, Transit Safety Programs Manager Florida Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, MS-26 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 Prepared By: USF Center for Urban Transportation Research Lisa Staes, Program Director – Transit Safety and Workforce Development Jan Davis, Deputy Director – Transportation Finance, Management and Administration Contributor: Jodi Godfrey, Research Associate December 2015 Final Report i Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Florida Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. The Florida Department of Transportation assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Florida Department of Transportation. Final Report ii Technical Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle: 5. Report Date Examination of Passenger Assaults on Bus Transit Systems December 2015 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report Lisa Staes, Jan Davis, Jodi Godfrey No. BDV25 Task Work Order #943-26 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) National Center for Transit Research Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 11.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2027 HART Transit Development Plan
    Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART) Transit Development Plan 2018 - 2027 Major Update Final Report September 2017 Prepared for Prepared by HART | TDP i Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Objectives of the Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 State Requirements ............................................................................................................................................ 1-2 TDP Checklist ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Organization of the Report .................................................................................................................................. 1-4 Section 2: Baseline Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 Study Area Description ....................................................................................................................................... 2-1 Population Trends and Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 2-3 Journey-to-Work Characteristics .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX O INDIRECT and CUMULATIVE EFFECTS TECHNICAL REPORT May 2020 INDIRECT and CUMULATIVE EFFECTS TECHNICAL REPORT
    APPENDIX O INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS TECHNICAL REPORT May 2020 INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS TECHNICAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Corridors ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Study Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Alternatives Evaluated .................................................................................................................. 4 2 SCOPING AND METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................9 2.1 Legislation and Regulatory Guidance............................................................................................ 9 2.2 ICE Analysis Scope and Methodology ........................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Resource Identification and Data Collection ...................................................................... 10 2.2.2 ICE Analysis Area Boundary ................................................................................................ 10 2.2.3 ICE Time Frame ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportations &
    Transportations & map - Overview and detail maps - To Hamamatsu station from airport by trains - Transportation in Hamamatsu city Map overview Tokaido Shinkansen (bullet train) NRT HND Venue, Sep. 12 KIX NGO Venue, Sep. 11 and 13 Accommodation Hotel Crown Palais Hamamatsu To Hamamatsu from airport by trains JR (Japan Railway) Lines Limited express “Narita Express” Tokaido Shinkansen Keikyu Line Tokyo Narita airport (NRT), Terminal 1 (bullet train) Super express Tokyo Haneda airport (HND), International terminal Tokyo Narita airport (NRT), Terminal 2 ・3 “Kodama” or “Hikari” 85min Tokyo Tokyo Shinagawa Shinagawa Shinagawa Shin-Yokohama You can use both Tokyo and Shinagawa to change trains but it is easy to do it at Shinagawa because 80 or 110 min Shinagawa is much smaller station than Tokyo. Shizuoka Meitetsu Line Chubu international airport (NGO) Hamamatsu (Nagoya international airport) 30 or 50 min Nagoya Nagoya Limited express “Haruka” 55 or 70 min - There are many different ways. Here I show Kyoto Kyoto only the most simplest way from each airport. Shin-Osaka Shin-Osaka - You can also use google map to find route 55min including train and bus. Kansai international airport (KIX) Tokaido Shinkansen (bullet train) - Shinkansen, a super express bullet train, is the fastest railway in Japan. - There are so many Tokaido Shinkansen trains between Tokyo and Shin-Osaka station, but trains stopping at Hamamatsu station are limited numbers. - There are 3 types of trains in Tokaido Shinkansen as below. You can use “Hirakari” or “Kodama” to Hamamatsu. Train Detail Duration to Hamamatsu(min) name Tokyo Shinagawa Nagoya Shin-Osaka Nozomi It is fastest but DOES NOT stop at NA NA NA NA Hamamatsu.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Element 08-08-08 – NON ADOPTED PORTION
    Future of Hillsborough Comprehensive Plan for Unincorporated Hillsborough County Florida TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT As Amended by the Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners June 5, 2008 (Ordinance 08- 13) Department of Community Affairs Notice of Intent to Find Comprehensive Plan Amendments in Compliance published August 4, 2008 {DCA PA No. 08-1ER-NOI-2901- (A)-(l)} August 26, 2008 Effective Date This Page Intentionally Blank. 2 Hillsborough County Transportation Element Hillsborough County Transportation Element TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 7 II. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS ............................................................ 15 III. FUTURE NEEDS AND ALTERNATIVES............................................ 81 IV. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES............................................121 V. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING ..................................161 VI. DEFINITIONS ................................................................................167 Sections IV, V, VI, Appendix C, D, G, I, and Appendix J Maps 2, 2B, 15, and 25 of the Transportation Element have been adopted by the Board of County Commissioners as required by Part II, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The remainder of the Transportation Element and appendices contains background information. Hillsborough County Transportation Element 3 TRANSPORTATION APPENDIX A-J Appendix A Inventory of State Roads in Hillsborough County Appendix B Inventory of County Roads
    [Show full text]
  • Maple Grove Transit 2016 “Expressbusservice”
    Maple Grove Transit 2016 “Express Bus Service” Customer Survey Report of Results December 2016 Prepared by: 2955 Valmont Road • Suite 300 • Boulder, Colorado 80301 • t: 303-444-7863 • www.n-r-c.com Maple Grove Transit “Express Bus Service” Customer Survey December 2016 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 Survey Background ...................................................................................................................4 Survey Results ...........................................................................................................................4 Appendix A: Verbatim Responses to Open-ended Survey Questions .................................... 34 Appendix B: Select Results Compared by Respondent Race/Ethnicity .................................. 92 Appendix C: Copy of Survey Questionnaire .......................................................................... 107 National Research Center, Inc. Report of Results Prepared by Maple Grove Transit “Express Bus Service” Customer Survey December 2016 List of Tables Table 1: Question 1................................................................................................................................................ 4 Table 2: Question 2 ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Table 3: Question 3 Compared by Question 1 ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • No Action Alternative Report
    No Action Alternative Report April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. NEC FUTURE Background ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Approach to No Action Alternative.............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS .................................................................................... 4 3.2 DISINVESTMENT SCENARIO ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 TRAIN SERVICE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE RAIL PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.1 Funded Projects or Projects with Approved Funding Plans (Category 1) ............................................................. 9 4.2.2 Funded or Unfunded Mandates (Category 2) .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Services Department
    FY 2019 Budget Workshop Community Services Department May 8, 2018 Community Services Department Dottie Keedy, Director Community Services Department Outline • Overview of Department – Organizational Chart – Overview of Divisions • Accomplishments • Efficiencies • Benchmarks (Volusia, Seminole, Orange, Osceola, Polk, Sumter, Marion) – Proposed Division Budget – Departmental Budget – Summary Community Services Department Overview • The Lake County Community Services Department serves as the link between government and the community and works with numerous partners to improve the quality of life of Lake County residents in need of assistance. • The Department includes the Transit, Housing and Community Development, Health and Human Services and Probation Divisions. Community Services Department Organizational Chart 42 FTEs Community Services Department Administration (5 FTEs) Health & Human Housing & Services Community Transit Division Probation Division Division Development Division ( 5 FTEs) (15 FTEs) (7 FTEs) (10 FTEs) Health & Human Services Division Allison Thall, Health & Human Services Division Manager Health & Human Services Overview • The Health and Human Services Division provides services to Lake County citizens in need of assistance and includes the following sections and programs: Children and Elder Services, the Community Health Worker Program, and Veterans Services. • The Division also manages the state mandated programs related to Medicaid, inmate medical, and public health. Health & Human Services Organizational Chart 7
    [Show full text]
  • Sunrail.Com Not to Scale
    WELCOME ABOARD! BROCHURE LYMMO is your ride to great places M around Downtown Orlando. Whether you’re heading to work, a meal, or one of the many attractions Downtown, LYMMO’s frequent service and bus-only lanes will get you there faster. LYNX is the public transit provider for LYMMO Orange, Lime and And when you’re riding LYMMO, you Orange, Osceola and Seminole counties. never have to worry about parking. Additional connectivity with Grapefruit Lines If you don’t see your destination here, Lake and Polk counties. CONTACT US and we can connect you DIRECT SERVICE TO: to the right LYMMO. CONTACT US for information on fares, bus stops, schedules and trip planning: Amway Center Heritage Square Ready to roll? Look inside for more info... Bob Carr Theater Lake Eola Park 407-841-5969 phone County Courthouse LYNX Central Station 407-423-0787 tdd County Health Dept Orlando City Stadium Dr Phillips Center Parramore Notice of Title VI Rights: LYNX operates its programs and services without regard to race, color, golynx.com web religion, gender, age, national origin, disability, or family status in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Any person who believes Effective: he or she has been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice APRIL 2017 related to Title VI may file a complaint in writing to LYNX Title VI Officer Desna Hunte, 455 N. Garland Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801 or by calling THANK YOU FOR RIDING LYNX! 407-254-6117, email [email protected] or www.golynx.com. Information in other languages or accessible formats available upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • I-95/I-395 Transit/TDM Study Executive Summary
    I-95/I-395 Transit/TDM Study Executive Summary prepared for Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation prepared by KFH Group, Inc. and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with LDA Consulting MCV Associates, Inc. PRR, Inc. August 2017 I-95/I-395 Transit/TDM Study Executive Summary Study Overview The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) plans to expand and convert the two existing reversible High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes in the I-395 corridor to three managed High Occupancy Toll (HOT), or Express lanes for approximately eight miles from just north of Edsall Road to just north of Eads Street near the Pentagon. Tolling of the new I-395 Express lanes will begin in 2019. The purpose of the I-95/I-395 Transit/TDM Study is to identify a comprehensive, fiscally unconstrained, set of transit and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) investments on which future toll revenues from the I-395 Express lanes may be invested. Potential investments include new and expanded bus and rail transit services, transit capital projects, commuter parking facilities, TDM program enhancements, and technology improvements that support transit and TDM – all with the intent of maximizing person throughput to support economic development and quality of life for communities along the corridor. The study included three key phases: Project Background and Needs Assessment – This phase of the study laid the groundwork for developing strategies, conducting analysis, conversing with stakeholders and the public, and reaching consensus on recommendations; Planning and Analysis – This was an interactive phase, with multiple rounds of feedback between analysis and stakeholder review and comment; and Plan Development and Delivery – This phase developed the recommendations from the prior phase into real solutions that State, regional, and local partners can proceed with towards implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CELEBRATION CONTINUES Contents Vol
    WINTER 2 0 0 7 FOR ALUMNI & FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA UT THE CELEBRATION CONTINUES Contents Vol. XXII, No. 2 Winter 2007 About the Cover Features The inset images in this holiday montage are from vintage postcard reproductions in a souvenir collection The Other Side of a President’s President. 1 available in the Henry B. Plant Museum. They depict classic views of the UT campus Dr. David M. Delo is a revered figure in at various times in its history. The museum, established University history, but little has been told about in 1933, celebrates the 25th anniversary of its Victorian Christmas Stroll this December. the private life of the beloved late president— Concept and photo direction by Anne Rowland. until now. Photography by Jeff Young. Duplicate Mailings Big Step, Little Fanfare. Odis Richardson ’65 5 Please help us cut down on mailing costs. If your household is receiving more than one copy of the UT came to UT when it was a white university, and Journal, send us the address labels from each copy. We will review our records and correct any duplication. left as its first black graduate. This is his story. Send your labels to The University of Tampa Office of Alumni Relations • Box H UT—The Middle Years. The second of three 401 W. Kennedy Blvd. • Tampa, FL 33606-1490 16-page special sections relives the middle third Address changes also can be made online by clicking on alumni.ut.edu. of University history, telling in words and pictures the UT story from 1956-81.
    [Show full text]