Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Paradise in Peril. Western colonial power and Japanese expansion in Sout-East Asia, 1905-1941 Bussemaker, H.Th. Publication date 2001 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bussemaker, H. T. (2001). Paradise in Peril. Western colonial power and Japanese expansion in Sout-East Asia, 1905-1941. in eigen beheer. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:11 Oct 2021 431 1 Chapterr 4. AUSTRALIA A 4.1.. Introduction. Whenn Japanese forces assaulted the natural cordon sanitaire of Australia - the Malay Barrierr - Australia found itself in the embarrassing position that over three-quarters of its bestt troops were fighting the Germans and the Italians in the Middle East almost three- quarterss of its pilots were flying RAF planes over Western European skies, and more than halff its fleet was patrolling the Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Australia had placed itself in aa unique position in that respect in the history of World War II . No other country had its mainn forces more than 5,000 miles from its own borders, while being threatened by an enemyy which was much closer. Howw did the Australian Government get into this predicament? This chapter is intended to givee an answer to this question, an answer which was also important for the Dutch defencee planning of the Netherlands East Indies. It will be shown that the defence of the Malayy Barrier was not as strong as it could have been, because of the altruistic Australian defencee policies, in the period between the German war declaration and the Japanese attackk on Pearl Harbor. The Dutch paid the ultimate price - the loss of their colony, much losss of life and inhuman treatment of their soldiers and civilians and of the indigenous Indonesianss by the Japanese occupying forces. The Australians just barely escaped that fate,, but it was a close thing. Howw could this happen? To comprehend this amazing situation, Australia's "Grand Strategy"" has to be discussed, as formulated by the Australian political parties and influen- cedd by Australian History. Next the foreign policy as formulated by the ruling government is treated.. Any credible foreign policy must be based upon sound defence planning, which thereforee will be covered extensively. In fact, Australia paid much attention to defence planning,, almost from its beginnings as a colony, and even started re-armament much earlierr than the Netherlands East Indies. Likee Japan, Australia emerged from the First World War with expanded responsibilities for thee peace in the region of Asia and the Pacific. Unlike Japan, however, Australia invested heavilyy in the development of a social-economic welfare state; together with New Zealand probablyy the first viable one before the Second World War. It could invest in this experi- ment,, because it had obtained an Imperial guarantee from the Royal Navy for its protecti- on.. Australia resembled the Netherlands East Indies in this respect, because that colony alsoo profited enormously from the Pax Britannica without any formal agreement Unlike the Netherlandss East Indies, the Australians were partners in Imperial defence, and therefore hadd some influence on the extent and credibility of this British guarantee. Subsequent Australiann Governments, irrespective of their political colour, did not exploit this advantage- ouss position however, notwithstanding the growing menace of Japan. Australiaa as a nation remained in a position of filial bondage to its beloved and much- respectedd Mother country. Therefore the Australian Government did not challenge the 432 2 assumptionss underlying the British guarantee, even when it became clear in the late thirtiess that the guarantee was based on bluff, and no longer on real power. This theme hass been more fully explored in Chapter 2. A more independent attitude of the Australian Governmentt however, combined with a faster industrialisation and a higher labour productivity,, would have resulted in Australia being better prepared, which might also have beenn in a position to save the Dutch from ignominious defeat. Therefore, certainly for Dutchh readers, the Australian defence policy and pre-war plans and preparations are of moree than just academic interest. It should be recalled that eleven months before Pearl Harbor,, the Australian Prime Minister was talking to the Dutch Governor General about the possibilityy of locating an Australian Division in Java2054. This suggestion came to nought becausee of Dutch pride, but the potential was there. Thee important role of the Australian Government in helping the Dutch colonial administra- tion,, during the trying period the Netherlands was occupied by the Germans, has not attractedd much attention at all in historical publications, neither in English nor in Dutch publications.. Well-known Dutch-language publications, like the 13-volume history of the Netherlandss in the Second World War by de Jong2055 or the impressive 3-volume Histo- ry20566 of the Koninklijke Marine (The Netherlands Royal Navy) do not pay much attention too Dutch relations with Australia. Thee increasing formal and informal contacts between Colony and Dominion after May 1940 aree highlighted in the second part of this chapter, which lead to a degree of cooperation evenn before Pearl Harbor. At that time it was unmatched by either Great Britain or the Unitedd States. This positive Australian attitude2057, more than anything else, was responsi- blee for strengthening the hand of the Dutch colonial administration, when facing increasing Japanesee demands. By contrast, as discussed in Chapter 2, ƒ page 217-221) the British Governmentt refused to give any guarantee to the NEI until a few days before Pearl Harbor.. According to mutually agreed plans, however, Australia provided for stocks and maintenancee parties in 1941, in those parts of the archipelago which they had agreed to defend.. At the time of Pearl Harbor, Australian planes and troops had taken over the defencee of those parts of the NEI. Moreover, it was in Australia where, after the Allied defeat,, the remnants of the Royal Dutch Netherlands Indies Army (Koninklijk Nederlands- IndischIndisch Leger or KNIL) tried to reconstitute itself2058. The important role of Australia in thee support of the NEI colonial administration against looming Japanese aggression, is the ""** Telegram Governor-General N.E.I, to Minister for Colonies, no 37/U of 29 January 1941, in ARA, Departmentt of Foreign Affairs, Archives of the Consulate-General in Sydney, accesion number 2.05.48.14, inventoryy number 78. This will be referred in future notes as ARA, Sydney Archives, no 78. 20599 Dr. L. de Jong: "Het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden in de Tweede Wereldoorlog" The most interesting volumee of this series, dealing with the war in the Far East, is Volume 11-a: "Nedertands-lndiê I", tweede helft, Martinuss Nijhoff Leiden 1984. This publication will be referred to in subsequent notes as De Jong, 11a. 805,11 Ph.M. Bosscher: "De Koninklijke Marine in de Tweede Wereldoorlog". Volume 2 , Franeker 1986. This volumee deals with S.E. Asia, and will be subsequently referred to as Bosscher. **77 Prime Minister Menzies told the Governor-General on January 28. 1941 that Australia would do whateverr was in its power to assist the Netherlands East Indies in the provision of weapons and munitions. ARA,, Sydney Archive, 78 Ibid. 80™™ J.M. Ford: Allies in a bind - Australia and the Netherlands East Indies relations during the Second World War.War. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Univ. of Queensland, Santa Lucia 1994. To be subsequently referred to as Ford. 433 3 subjectt of the second part of this chapter. Itt should not be forgotten that another British Dominion played a sometimes decisive role: Neww Zealand. It had much in common with Australia. New Zealand is not covered in a separatee chapter, but is dealt with in the present study where it played an important role. 4.2.. A short political history of Australia. Australia,, terra australis incognito (the unknown Southland of the Renaissance maps) is thee smallest of the world's continents. Its west coast was discovered by Dutch navigators blownn off course on their way to the East Indies. They christened the desert shores north off the modern city of Perth "Nieuw-Holland". Dutch expeditions explored the uninviting Northh Coast, but the wild aboriginals had no trade potential whatsoever, that being the only subjectt the Dutch were really interested in. Abel Tasman, in his epic voyage around the southh of the continent, discovered Tasmania ("Van Diemen's Land') and the west coast of Neww Zealand in 1642, but he missed the Australian east coast, which was discovered by Jamess Cook in 1770. Cook'ss discovery of the lush Australian east coast came at the appropriate moment Englandd needed a penitentiary colony to relieve its overburdenend prisons, filled with convictss who were being punished under the harsh laws existening in England. The loss of thee American colonies also meant the loss of a dumping ground for these convicts. Moreover,, the start of the industrial revolution created an underclass which turned more andd more to violence, thus overloading the prison system.
Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of the Loss of HMAS SYDNEY
    An analysis of the loss of HMAS SYDNEY By David Kennedy The 6,830-ton modified Leander class cruiser HMAS SYDNEY THE MAIN STORY The sinking of cruiser HMAS SYDNEY by disguised German raider KORMORAN, and the delayed search for all 645 crew who perished 70 years ago, can be attributed directly to the personal control by British wartime leader Winston Churchill of top-secret Enigma intelligence decodes and his individual power. As First Lord of the Admiralty, then Prime Minster, Churchill had been denying top secret intelligence information to commanders at sea, and excluding Australian prime ministers from knowledge of Ultra decodes of German Enigma signals long before SYDNEY II was sunk by KORMORAN, disguised as the Dutch STRAAT MALAKKA, off north-Western Australia on November 19, 1941. Ongoing research also reveals that a wide, hands-on, operation led secretly from London in late 1941, accounted for the ignorance, confusion, slow reactions in Australia and a delayed search for survivors . in stark contrast to Churchill's direct part in the destruction by SYDNEY I of the German cruiser EMDEN 25 years before. Churchill was at the helm of one of his special operations, to sweep from the oceans disguised German raiders, their supply ships, and also blockade runners bound for Germany from Japan, when SYDNEY II was lost only 19 days before the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor and Southeast Asia. Covering up of a blunder, or a punitive example to the new and distrusted Labor government of John Curtin gone terribly wrong because of a covert German weapon, can explain stern and brief official statements at the time and whitewashes now, with Germany and Japan solidly within Western alliances.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of Oral History Recording
    TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL HISTORY RECORDING Accession number S00543 Title (Not Applicable) Burnside, Dr Colin Campbell (Lieutenant) Interviewer Connell, Daniel Place made Not stated Date made March 1989 Description Dr Colin Campbell Burnside as a lieutenant Radar Officer, HMAS Hobart, interviewed by Daniel Connell for the Keith Murdoch Sound Archive of Australia in the War of 1939–45 Discussing pre-war employment; enlistment; acceptance into ASDIC; transfer to England and studying radar at Portsmouth; radar appointment to Adelaide; description of sinking of Rameses; intelligence reports on enemy radar sets; task of outfitting Hobart with radar equipment; involvement in selection and purchase of radar equipment for Hobart; installation of radar on Hobart; crew morale; shipboard life; post-war Japan; demobilisation; post-war employment opportunities. COLIN CAMPBELL Page 2 of 34 Disclaimer The Australian War Memorial is not responsible either for the accuracy of matters discussed or opinions expressed by speakers, which are for the reader to judge. Transcript methodology Please note that the printed word can never fully convey all the meaning of speech, and may lead to misinterpretation. Readers concerned with the expressive elements of speech should refer to the audio record. It is strongly recommended that readers listen to the sound recording whilst reading the transcript, at least in part, or for critical sections. Readers of this transcript of interview should bear in mind that it is a verbatim transcript of the spoken word and reflects the informal conversational style that is inherent in oral records. Unless indicated, the names of places and people are as spoken, regardless of whether this is formally correct or not – e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • We Envy No Man on Earth Because We Fly. the Australian Fleet Air
    We Envy No Man On Earth Because We Fly. The Australian Fleet Air Arm: A Comparative Operational Study. This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Murdoch University 2016 Sharron Lee Spargo BA (Hons) Murdoch University I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. …………………………………………………………………………….. Abstract This thesis examines a small component of the Australian Navy, the Fleet Air Arm. Naval aviators have been contributing to Australian military history since 1914 but they remain relatively unheard of in the wider community and in some instances, in Australian military circles. Aviation within the maritime environment was, and remains, a versatile weapon in any modern navy but the struggle to initiate an aviation branch within the Royal Australian Navy was a protracted one. Finally coming into existence in 1947, the Australian Fleet Air Arm operated from the largest of all naval vessels in the post battle ship era; aircraft carriers. HMAS Albatross, Sydney, Vengeance and Melbourne carried, operated and fully maintained various fixed-wing aircraft and the naval personnel needed for operational deployments until 1982. These deployments included contributions to national and multinational combat, peacekeeping and humanitarian operations. With the Australian government’s decision not to replace the last of the aging aircraft carriers, HMAS Melbourne, in 1982, the survival of the Australian Fleet Air Arm, and its highly trained personnel, was in grave doubt. This was a major turning point for Australian Naval Aviation; these versatile flyers and the maintenance and technical crews who supported them retrained on rotary aircraft, or helicopters, and adapted to flight operations utilising small compact ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Headmark 029 8-3 Aug 1982
    JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL INSTITUTE VOLUME 8 AUGUST 1982 NUMBER 3 AUSTRALIAN NAVAL INSTITUTE 1. The Australian Naval Inslitute has been formed and incorporated in the Australian Capital Territory. The main objects of the Institute are:— a. to encourage and promote the advancement of knowledge related to the Navy and the Maritime profession. b. to provide a forum foi the exchange of ideas concerning subjects related to the Navy and the Maritime profession. c. to publish a journal. 2. The Institute is self supposing and non-profit making. The aim is to encourage discussion, dissemina- tion of information, comment and opinion and the advancement of professional knowledge concerning naval and maritime matte-s. 3. Membership of the Institute is open to — a. Regular Members — Members of the Permanent Naval Forces of Australia. b. Associate Members — (1) Members of the Reserve Naval Forces of Australia. (2) Members of the Australian Military Forces and the Royal Australian Air Force both permanent and reserve. (3) Ex-members of the Australian Defence Forces, both permanent and reserve components, provided that they have been honourably discharged from that force. (4) Other persons having and professing a special interest in naval and maritime affairs. c. Honorary Members — A person who has made a distinguished contribution to the Naval or maritime profession or who has rendered distinguished service to the Institute may be elected by the Council to Honorary Membership. 4 Joining fee for Regular ard Associate members is $5. Annual Subscription for both is $15. 5. Inquiries and application for membership should be directed to:— The Secretary, Australian Naval Institute, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • How Not to Run an Air Force! -The Higher Command of the Royal Australian Air Force During the Second World War
    How NOTTO RUN AN AIR FORCE! THEHIGHER COMMAND OF THE ROYAL AUSTRALIANAIR FORCE DURINGTHE SECONDWORLD WAR O Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2000 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without permission from AusInfo. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Manager, Legislative Services, AusInfo, GPO Box 84, Canberra ACT 2601. First published in 2000 by: Air Power Studies Centre RAAF Base Fairbairn ACT 2600 Australia National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Ashworth, Norman, 1933- . How not to run an air force! -the higher command of the Royal Australian Air Force during the second world war Bibliography Includes index ISBN 0 642 26550 X (vol. 1) ISBN 0 642 26551 8 (vol. 2) 1. World War, 1939-1945 - Australia. 2. World War, 1939-1945 - Australia - Sources. 3. Strategy - History - 2oth century. 4. Australia- History, Military - 1939- 1945 - Sources. 5. Australia - History - 1939-1945 - Sources I.Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Air Power Studies Centre. 11. Title. (Series: Heritage series (Canberra ACT)). Other titles in the series: Secret Action of 305 Smith & Coghlan Winner of the 1988 Heritage Award The RAAF Mirage Story Compiled by Wing Commander M.R. Susans Winner of the 1989 Heritage Award Alfresco Flight - The RAAFAntarctic Experience David Wilson Winner ofthe 1990 Heritage Award Edge of Centre - The eventj5l life of Group Captain GeraldPacker Chris Coulthard-Clark Winner of the 1991 Heritage Award Beaufighters Over New Guinea - No. 30 Squadron RAAF 1942-1943 George Turnball Dick Winner of the 1992 Heritage Award Defeat to Victory -No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Report of the Inquiry Into Unresolved Recognition for Past Acts of Naval and Military Gallantry and Valour
    Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal THE REPORT OF THE INQUIRY INTO UNRESOLVED RECOGNITION FOR PAST ACTS OF NAVAL AND MILITARY GALLANTRY AND VALOUR THE REPORT OF THE INQUIRY INTO UNRESOLVED RECOGNITION FOR PAST ACTS OF NAVAL AND MILITARY GALLANTRY AND VALOUR This publication has been published by the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal. Copies of this publication are available on the Tribunal’s website: www.defence-honours-tribunal.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2013 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal. Editing and design by Biotext, Canberra. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL INQUIRY INTO UNRESOLVED RECOGNITION FOR PAST ACTS OF NAVAL AND MILITARY GALLANTRY AND VALOUR Senator The Hon. David Feeney Parliamentary Secretary for Defence Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Parliamentary Secretary, I am pleased to present the report of the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal’s Inquiry into Unresolved Recognition for Past Acts of Naval and Military Gallantry and Valour. The Inquiry was conducted in accordance with the Terms of Reference. The Tribunal that conducted the Inquiry arrived unanimously at the findings and recommendations set out in this report. In accordance with the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal Procedural Rules 2011, this report will be published on the Tribunal’s website — www.defence-honours-tribunal.gov.au — 20 working days after
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Defence in the Indian Ocean 1928-60
    Imperial Defence in the Indian Ocean, 1928-60 Chris Madsen Le concept persistant de défense « impériale » – plus récemment surnommée « commonwealth » – a souligné une présence britannique viable dans l’océan Indien. La Marine royale britannique avait garanti des lignes de communication maritimes sur sa largeur et la sécurité des possessions britanniques le long de ses rives. La station ou flotte dite des Indes orientales était toujours inférieure en stature et en priorité que, par exemple, celle de la Méditerranée ou celle du Pacifique, mais a gagné en importance avec la croissance successivement de la menace et des conquêtes japonaises, des actes allemands de guerre de commerce intermittente aussi bien en surface que sous l’eau, et de l’élargissement de la portée navale mondiale de l’Union soviétique. Le triangle de l’Inde, de l’Afrique du Sud et de l’Australie était à la base de l’encouragement britannique pour la constitution de marines permanentes et aux vues similaires, capables de travailler de manière coopérative avec les forces navales britanniques disponibles. Ce document met l’accent sur les dimensions financières de ces accommodations, la politique nationale d’association, et l’idée d’une flotte commune financée dans une moindre mesure par chaque pays concerné. Pendant trop longtemps, la Grande-Bretagne a pris pour acquis autant l’océan Indien que ses partenaires. Great Britain, as an imperial power, exercised a privileged position in the Indian Ocean by virtue of naval and military strength. The jewel India was seized from foreign rivals and local rulers, whilst territories and colonies acquired, settled, and exploited ringed its shores from Africa in the west to the federated Malaya states and Australia in the east.1 At the close of the First World War, any map of this region would have shown great blotches of red identifying lands and islands affiliated with the British Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy League of Australia, and "Tha Merchant Navy," Journal of Tha Merchant Service Guild PERSONALITIES
    "'NAVY CONTENTS Vol. 12 NOVEMBER, 1949 Australia's Maritime "KEMBLA" EDITORIAL Journal L.H.n to Hi* Editors 5 Published Monthly COPPER, BRASS AND Editor).I 10 OTHER NON-FERROUS ARTICLES Editor: WIRE CABLES & TUBES Wotcli.r! Old Timer f By "l.»." 12 G. H. GILL, V/indjamming in War-time By John N. Burg.is IS Associate Editor: METAL MANUFACTURES LTD. H.M.S. "Phoenii" 19 PORT KEMBLA. N.S.W. Captain Anniversaries of the Month By John Clark 20 W. 6. LAWltENCE. M.I.E. S.S. "Time" By Norman Allan 25 SELLING AGENTS fw,ih DiKrtt>utar> in ill Stein) Moaogiag Editor: Britain'i Battleships By Teffrail 2B BARRY E. KEEN. Tha Royal Navy is Strong and Praparad—By Captain Tapprall Dorllng, WHS & CABLES Tl'Bti i H8ASS «IR1 D.S.O.. R.N » KNOX SCHLAPP PTY. LTD. BRITISH INSULATED Naw Transmitting Compan By A. Hina, B.Sc. 30 CALLENDER'S CABLES lecoraorating the "Navy (.••gut Jour­ Collins HoiLse, Melbourne LTD- nal," Official Organ of th* Navy League PERSONALITIES 84-William St., Melbourne of AustrelV and "The Merchant Navy," Kembla Building, Sydney 44 Margaret St.. Sydney. Commander (S) Ralph Frank Marrton Lowe, R.A.N 17 Journal of tho Merchant Sorvico Guild of Auitralosia. OVERSEAS NEWS. Circulating through tho Royal Austra­ M.rilim. Nawi of tha World 22 lia* and Naw Zealand Navies, tho Mer­ chant Sorvico and to tho general public. News of tha World's Naviai 24 PaMbhed by The Navy League. Royal SPECIAL FEATURES Exchange Building, 54a Pitt Street, Syd­ ZINC ney. N.S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • We Envy No Man on Earth Because We Fly
    By Webmaster The FAAAA is honoured to be able to publish the following Thesis by Dr. Sharron Spargo, who prepared it as part of her Degree of Doctory of Philosophy in 2016. She advises me that the work is currently being rewritten in preparation for publication as a history of the Fleet Air Arm, in its own right. Any readers who have served in the RAN Fleet Air Arm will relate to this work: it traces the evolution of the FAA from the very early days though to the present, and in doing so delves into detail of the truly memorable post WWII parts of our history: the Korean Conflict and Vietnam in particular. But it is not a dry history, as some are. It contains the names and thoughts of many names that we recognise: ship and squadron mates who served with us, and whose insights into circumstances and events are of themselves great interest. I commend it to you as a body of work that serves to capture, from a fresh perspective, the life and times of this the very best Arm of the Royal Australian Navy. Our grateful thanks go to Dr Spargo for allowing this work to be published on our website. Marcus Peake Webmaster 10Jun17 We Envy No Man On Earth Because We Fly. The Australian Fleet Air Arm: A Comparative Operational Study. This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Murdoch University 2016 Sharron Lee Spargo BA (Hons) Murdoch University I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Station 1941
    CHAPTER 1 2 THE AUSTRALIA STATION—194 1 N the Australia Station the year 1941 was, in the main, a perio d O of building up in preparation for an extension of the war on a major scale in the Far East . Long recognised as a possibility, suc h extension increasingly loomed as a probability as the year progressed, until the storm finally burst in the Pacific in December . Meanwhile, after the German raider attack on Nauru Island on th e 27th December 1940, the Australia Station had remained free from enem y attack until November 1941 . Alarms and false reports were not wantin g however, mainly of sightings of " submarines" ; nor was there lack of evidence of the visits of the raiders the previous year . Scarce a month of 1941 passed without one or more of the mines then laid being swep t up, sighted floating, or found washed ashore on beaches, to a total o f forty-nine.' Most of them were from, and near, the fields laid off the Spencer Gulf, Hobart, Bass Strait, and the New South Wales coas t between Sydney and Newcastle ; but one of the dummy mines laid by Orion in September 1940 off Albany, Western Australia, was in Novem- ber 1941 washed ashore in King George Sound, and the following mont h a German mine was recovered in Hervey Bay, Queensland. The swept mines were accounted for by the ships of the 20th Mine- sweeping Flotilla in conjunction with the minesweeping groups based o n the ports in the various areas . Some of the "floaters" were sighted (and in a number of instances destroyed by rifle fire) by coastal merchant ships .
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Naval Personalities
    AustrAliAn NavAl PersonAlities lives from the AustrAliAn DictionAry of BiogrAPhy Cover painting by Dale Marsh Ordinary Seaman Edward Sheean, HMAS Armidale Oil on plywood. 49.5 x 64.8cm Australian War Memorial (ART 28160) First published in February 2006 Electronic version updated October 2006 © The Australian National University, original ADB articles © Commonwealth of Australia 2006, all remaining articles This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Announcement statement—may be announced to the public. Secondary release—may be released to the public. All Defence information, whether classified or not, is protected from unauthorised disclosure under the Crimes Act 1914. Defence Information may only be released in accordance with the Defence Protective Security Manual (SECMAN 4) and/or Defence Instruction (General) OPS 13-4—Release of Classified Defence Information to Other Countries, as appropriate. Requests and inquiries should be addressed to the Director, Sea Power Centre - Australia, Department of Defence. CANBERRA, ACT, 2600. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Entry Gilbert, G. P. (Gregory Phillip), 1962-. Australian Naval Personalities. Lives from the Australian Dictionary of Biography. Biography ISBN 0 642 296367 1. Sea Power - Australia. 2. Navies - Australia. 3. Australian - Biography. 4. Australia. Royal Australian Navy. I. Gilbert, G. P. (Gregory Phillip), 1962-. II. Australia. Royal Australian
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Years at the Top an Analysis of the Role of Air Marshal Sir George Jones As Chief of the Air Staff, Royal Australian Air
    TEN YEARS AT THE TOP AN ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF AIR MARSHAL SIR GEORGE JONES AS CHIEF OF THE AIR STAFF, ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCE 1942 - 1952 PETER HELSON A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY AT THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES, 2006 Abstract This thesis sets out to examine the proposition that Air Marshal Sir George Jones’ time as Chief of the Air Staff (CAS) of the Royal Australian Air force (RAAF) was both beneficial and detrimental to the Service but the benefits gained from his time in office outweighed the detriment. Sir George Jones served as CAS for nearly ten years (1942 - 1952). This was the longest continuous appointment of a CAS to date. Jones was CAS for most of the Second World War and it was during that time that the two events for which he is most remembered occurred, viz the controversy surrounding his appointment and his ongoing conflict with the RAAF Operational Commander (W.D. Bostock). In order to assess his impact on the RAAF, this thesis describes events and incidents that occurred while Jones was CAS. To compile this work, data was drawn from numerous sources including: interviews with family members and ex-RAAF personnel; official records maintained by the National Archives of Australia (NAA), the RAAF Historical Section and the RAAF Museum; Jones’ personal papers held by family members and the Australian War Memorial; and the papers of other RAAF officers and politicians held by the RAAF Museum and the National Library of Australia (NLA).
    [Show full text]