DOCSLIB.ORG

The Report of the Inquiry Into Unresolved Recognition for Past Acts of Naval and Military Gallantry and Valour

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Report of the Inquiry Into Unresolved Recognition for Past Acts of Naval and Military Gallantry and Valour Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal THE REPORT OF THE INQUIRY INTO UNRESOLVED RECOGNITION FOR PAST ACTS OF NAVAL AND MILITARY GALLANTRY AND VALOUR THE REPORT OF THE INQUIRY INTO UNRESOLVED RECOGNITION FOR PAST ACTS OF NAVAL AND MILITARY GALLANTRY AND VALOUR This publication has been published by the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal. Copies of this publication are available on the Tribunal’s website: www.defence-honours-tribunal.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2013 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal. Editing and design by Biotext, Canberra. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL INQUIRY INTO UNRESOLVED RECOGNITION FOR PAST ACTS OF NAVAL AND MILITARY GALLANTRY AND VALOUR Senator The Hon. David Feeney Parliamentary Secretary for Defence Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Parliamentary Secretary, I am pleased to present the report of the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal’s Inquiry into Unresolved Recognition for Past Acts of Naval and Military Gallantry and Valour. The Inquiry was conducted in accordance with the Terms of Reference. The Tribunal that conducted the Inquiry arrived unanimously at the findings and recommendations set out in this report. In accordance with the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal Procedural Rules 2011, this report will be published on the Tribunal’s website — www.defence-honours-tribunal.gov.au — 20 working days after the report is provided to you. Yours sincerely, Mr Alan Rose Chair Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal 21 February 2013 iii CONTENTS Letter of transmittal iii Terms of Reference ix Executive summary 1 Chapter One Introduction 12 Part One General considerations 23 Chapter Two Imperial and Australian honours systems 24 Chapter Three Constitutional issues and Australian sovereignty 27 Chapter Four The Imperial honours system 32 Chapter Five The Australian honours and awards system 56 Chapter Six End of war lists and reviews 62 Chapter Seven Retrospectivity, revision and belated awards 70 Chapter Eight Tribunal consideration 76 Chapter Nine Summary of individual cases 97 Chapter Ten Conclusions and recommendations 105 Part Two Individual cases 107 Chapter Eleven Gunner Albert Neil (Neale) Cleary 108 Chapter Twelve Midshipman Robert Ian Davies 119 Chapter Thirteen Leading Cook (Officers) Francis Bassett Emms 133 Chapter Fourteen Lieutenant David John Hamer 144 Chapter Fifteen Private John Simpson Kirkpatrick 160 Chapter Sixteen Able Seaman Dalmorton Joseph Owendale Rudd 186 Chapter Seventeen Ordinary Seaman Edward Sheean 198 Chapter Eighteen Leading Aircrewman Noel Ervin Shipp 232 Chapter Nineteen Lieutenant Commander Henry Hugh Gordon Dacre Stoker 248 Chapter Twenty Captain Hector Macdonald Laws Waller 262 Chapter Twenty-One HMAS Yarra 296 Chapter Twenty–Two Lieutenant Commander Robert William Rankin 318 Chapter Twenty-Three Lieutenant Commander Francis Edward Smith 327 Chapter Twenty-Four Acting Leading Seaman Ronald Taylor 333 Part Three Other nominations from members of the public 341 Chapter Twenty-Five Other nominations from members of the public 342 Abbreviations and acronyms 347 Contents v Appendixes 351 Appendix 1 Individuals and organisations who provided submissions to the Inquiry 352 Appendix 2 Tribunal hearing dates and witnesses 357 Appendix 3 List of persons from whom information was sought 365 Appendix 4 Additional material examined by the Tribunal 368 Appendix 5 Establishment of Australian honours and awards — Key dates 401 Appendix 6 Valour, gallantry and distinguished service criteria 402 Appendix 7 Imperial gallantry awards to Australian forces 406 Appendix 8 Honours by service per number who served 419 Appendix 9 Australian Victoria Cross awards 420 Appendix 10 Statement of Ordinary Seaman Jack Archibald 427 Index 431 Tables Table 4-1 Imperial gallantry awards 32 Table 4-2 Operational scale applied to service in Vietnam 34 Table 5-1 Imperial and Australian gallantry awards 57 Table 7-1 ‘Retrospective’ awards of the Imperial Victoria Cross 71 Table 8-1 Victoria Cross Awards made to the Royal Navy 81 Table 8-2 Recent Imperial Victoria Cross sales in Australia 85 Table 16-1 Australians who took part in the Zeebrugge raid 190 Table 16-2 Honours awarded to Australians who took part in the Zeebrugge raid 193 Table 17-1 The fate of those onboard HMAS Armidale 210 Table 17-2 Witness statements — HMAS Armidale 228 Table 18-1 Operational scale applied to service in Vietnam 239 Table 18-2 Comparison of the RANHFV with other RAN awards 240 Table 18-3 Comparison of awards to the RANHFV versus the RAAF No. 9 Squadron 241 Table 25-1 Individuals nominated by the public for acts of gallantry and valour 343 Table 25-2 Groups nominated by the public for acts of gallantry and valour 346 Table A6-1 First level of gallantry and distinguished service awards 402 Table A6-2 Second level of gallantry and distinguished service awards 403 Table A6-3 Third level of gallantry and distinguished service awards 404 Table A6-4 Fourth level of gallantry and distinguished service awards 405 Table A7-1 Imperial awards to Australian forces 409 Table A7-2 Imperial gallantry awards to Australian Forces — awards made for actions during conflict 410 vi The report of the inquiry into unresolved recognition for past acts of naval and military gallantry and valour Table A7-2A Imperial gallantry awards to Australian Forces — Australian Army 411 Table A7-2B Imperial gallantry awards to Australian Forces — Royal Australian Navy 411 Table A7-2C Imperial gallantry awards to Australian Forces — Royal Australian Air Force 412 Table A7-3 Imperial gallantry awards to Australian Forces by Service 413 Table A7-3A Imperial gallantry awards to Australian Forces — Boer War 413 Table A7-3B Imperial gallantry awards to Australian Forces — First World War 414 Table A7-3C Imperial gallantry awards to Australian Forces — Second World War 414 Table A7-3D Imperial gallantry awards to Australian Forces — Korean War 415 Table A7-3E Imperial gallantry awards to Australian Forces — Malayan Emergency 415 Table A7-3F Imperial gallantry awards to Australian Forces — Confrontation 415 Table A7-3G Imperial gallantry awards to Australian Forces — Vietnam War 416 Table A7-4 Imperial awards to Australian forces by Service 416 Table A7-5 Imperial awards to Australian forces made for actions during conflict 417 Table A7-6 ‘Posthumous’ imperial gallantry awards to Australian forces by Service 417 Table A7-7 ‘Posthumous’ Imperial gallantry awards to Australian forces made for actions during conflict 418 Table A8-1 Honours by service per number who served 419 Table A9-1 Imperial VC — Boer War (5 awards) 420 Table A9-2 Imperial VC — First World War (63 awards) 421 Table A9-3 Imperial VC — Second World War (19 awards) 424 Table A9-4 Imperial VC — Vietnam War (4 awards) 425 Table A9-5 Imperial VC to Australians serving in British Units — Boer War (1 award) 425 Table A9-6 Imperial VC to Australians serving in British Units — First World War (1 award) 425 Table A9-7 Imperial VC to Australians serving in British Units — Russian Civil War (2 awards) 425 Table A9-8 Imperial VC to Australians serving in British Units — Second World War (1 award) 425 Table A9-9 Australians awarded the Victoria Cross for Australia (3 awards) 426 Contents vii viii The report of the inquiry into unresolved recognition for past acts of naval and military gallantry and valour TERMS OF REFERENCE On 21 February 2011, the Parliamentary Secretary for Defence, Senator The Hon. David Feeney, directed the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal (the Tribunal) to inquire into the matter of Unresolved Recognition for Past Acts of Naval and Military Gallantry and Valour. The Tribunal considered draft terms of reference and, following receipt of its comments, the Parliamentary Secretary forwarded new Terms of Reference (as set out below) to the Tribunal on 29 April 2012. The Tribunal is directed to inquire into and report on the appropriate recognition for specific acts of gallantry or valour performed by the following naval and military personnel: • Gunner Albert Neil (Neale) Cleary — Army • Midshipman Robert Ian Davies — Navy • Leading Cook (Officers) Francis Bassett Emms — Navy • Lieutenant David John Hamer — Navy • Private John Simpson Kirkpatrick — Army • Lieutenant Commander Robert William Rankin — Navy • Able Seaman Dalmorton Joseph Owendale Rudd — Navy • Ordinary Seaman Edward Sheean — Navy • Leading Aircrewman Noel Ervin Shipp — Navy • Lieutenant Commander Francis Edward Smith — Navy • Lieutenant Commander Henry Hugh Gordon Stoker — Royal Navy • Leading Seaman Ronald Taylor — Navy • Captain Hector Macdonald Laws Waller — Navy The Tribunal is directed to make recommendations on the eligibility of the naval and military members, as listed, to be awarded the Victoria Cross, the Victoria Cross for Australia, or other forms of appropriate recognition for their gallantry or valour. The Tribunal is to examine relevant documentary evidence and consider any other material relevant to these claims, including, but not limited to, any previous reviews conducted with regard to appropriate recognition for this service. The Tribunal must consider the nature and context of the members’ actions in relation to the criteria for Australian and Imperial awards in order to arrive at a fair and sustainable response to claims for appropriate recognition. The Tribunal may interview such persons as it considers appropriate and consider material provided that is relevant to the Terms of Reference. The Tribunal is to report to the Parliamentary Secretary for Defence on any recommendations that arise from the Inquiry. In formulating its recommendations, the Tribunal is required to maintain the integrity of the Australian honours system and identify any consequential impact any finding or recommendation may have on that system. Terms of reference ix In addition, the Tribunal is also directed to receive submissions supporting the recognition of acts of gallantry or valour performed by other members of the Defence Force.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Commemorating the Overseas-Born Victoria Cross Heroes a First World War Centenary Event
    Commemorating the overseas-born Victoria Cross heroes A First World War Centenary event National Memorial Arboretum 5 March 2015 Foreword Foreword The Prime Minister, David Cameron The First World War saw unprecedented sacrifice that changed – and claimed – the lives of millions of people. Even during the darkest of days, Britain was not alone. Our soldiers stood shoulder-to-shoulder with allies from around the Commonwealth and beyond. Today’s event marks the extraordinary sacrifices made by 145 soldiers from around the globe who received the Victoria Cross in recognition of their remarkable valour and devotion to duty fighting with the British forces. These soldiers came from every corner of the globe and all walks of life but were bound together by their courage and determination. The laying of these memorial stones at the National Memorial Arboretum will create a lasting, peaceful and moving monument to these men, who were united in their valiant fight for liberty and civilization. Their sacrifice shall never be forgotten. Foreword Foreword Communities Secretary, Eric Pickles The Centenary of the First World War allows us an opportunity to reflect on and remember a generation which sacrificed so much. Men and boys went off to war for Britain and in every town and village across our country cenotaphs are testimony to the heavy price that so many paid for the freedoms we enjoy today. And Britain did not stand alone, millions came forward to be counted and volunteered from countries around the globe, some of which now make up the Commonwealth. These men fought for a country and a society which spanned continents and places that in many ways could not have been more different.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian War Memorial Annual Report 2013–2014
    EPORT 2013–2014 EPORT R L A L ANNU A ORI M R ME A N W A LI A AUSTR AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014 AUSTR A LI A N W A R ME M ORI A L ANNU A L R EPORT 2013–2014 EPORT AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014 Annual report for the year ended 30 June 2014, together with the financial statements and the report of the Auditor-General Images produced courtesy of the Australian War Memorial, Canberra Cover: Their Royal Highness The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge in a moment of private reflection at the Roll of Honour. PAIU2014/078.14 Title page: ANZAC Day National Ceremony 2014. PAIU2014/073.13 Copyright © Australian War Memorial ISSN 1441 4198 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced, copied, scanned, stored in a retrieval system, recorded, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the publisher. Australian War Memorial GPO Box 345 Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia www.awm.gov.au ii AUSTR A LI A N W A R ME M ORI A L ANNU A L R EPORT 2013–2014 EPORT Her Excellency the Honourable Dame Quentin Bryce AD CVO, Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, on her final visit to the Australian War Memorial as Governor-General. His Excellency General the Honourable Sir Peter Cosgrove AK MC (Retd), Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, and His Royal Highness The Duke of Cambridge KG KT during the Anzac Day National Ceremony 2014 commemorating the 99th anniversary of the Anzac landings.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Officers Report March 2019 Taken from Wikipedia in the Early
    Historical Officers Report March 2019 Taken from Wikipedia In the early 1920s North Beach rang again to the sound of work parties. Monumental stone from a Turkish quarry was off-loaded at a pier under the lee of the wreck of the Milo. From there it was lifted by aerial ropeway up past the Sphinx to the heights near Baby 700 and south down the ridge to the site of the great Australian monument on Gallipoli–Lone Pine. From North Beach stone also went out to build the cemeteries of Anzac, from Hill 60 in the north to Shell Green Cemetery in the south, 21 cemeteries and three memorials in all. The work was overseen by the Imperial (later Commonwealth) War Graves Commission’s Director of Works on Gallipoli, Lieutenant-Colonel Cyril Hughes, a Tasmanian who had served on Gallipoli. Before Hughes commenced this work of remembrance, he was visited between 15 February and 10 March 1919 by the Australian Historical Mission led by Charles Bean. The mission had come to solve, if it could, some of what Bean called ‘the riddles of Anzac’. It came also to collect material for Bean’s proposed war museum in Australia, a museum that was eventually to develop into the Australian War Memorial. George Lambert, the painter, accompanied the mission and Bean set him to the task of making sketches for what would become two of Australia’s best known war paintings–Anzac, the landing 1915 and The Charge of the 3rd Light Horse Brigade at the Nek, August 1915. Panorama of North Beach taken from Ari Burnu in 1919, showing the slopes first rushed by Australian soldiers on the day of the landing.
    [Show full text]
  • 1953 New Year Honours 1953 New Year Honours
    12/19/2018 1953 New Year Honours 1953 New Year Honours The New Year Honours 1953 for the United Kingdom were announced on 30 December 1952,[1] to celebrate the year passed and mark the beginning of 1953. This was the first New Year Honours since the accession of Queen Elizabeth II. The Honours list is a list of people who have been awarded one of the various orders, decorations, and medals of the United Kingdom. Honours are split into classes ("orders") and are graded to distinguish different degrees of achievement or service, most medals are not graded. The awards are presented to the recipient in one of several investiture ceremonies at Buckingham Palace throughout the year by the Sovereign or her designated representative. The orders, medals and decorations are awarded by various honours committees which meet to discuss candidates identified by public or private bodies, by government departments or who are nominated by members of the public.[2] Depending on their roles, those people selected by committee are submitted to Ministers for their approval before being sent to the Sovereign for final The insignia of the Grand Cross of the approval. As the "fount of honour" the monarch remains the final arbiter for awards.[3] In the case Order of St Michael and St George of certain orders such as the Order of the Garter and the Royal Victorian Order they remain at the personal discretion of the Queen.[4] The recipients of honours are displayed here as they were styled before their new honour, and arranged by honour, with classes (Knight, Knight Grand Cross, etc.) and then divisions (Military, Civil, etc.) as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • The Cabinet Manual
    The Cabinet Manual A guide to laws, conventions and rules on the operation of government 1st edition October 2011 The Cabinet Manual A guide to laws, conventions and rules on the operation of government 1st edition October 2011 Foreword by the Prime Minister On entering government I set out, Cabinet has endorsed the Cabinet Manual as an authoritative guide for ministers and officials, with the Deputy Prime Minister, our and I expect everyone working in government to shared desire for a political system be mindful of the guidance it contains. that is looked at with admiration This country has a rich constitution developed around the world and is more through history and practice, and the Cabinet transparent and accountable. Manual is invaluable in recording this and in ensuring that the workings of government are The Cabinet Manual sets out the internal rules far more open and accountable. and procedures under which the Government operates. For the first time the conventions determining how the Government operates are transparently set out in one place. Codifying and publishing these sheds welcome light on how the Government interacts with the other parts of our democratic system. We are currently in the first coalition Government David Cameron for over 60 years. The manual sets out the laws, Prime Minister conventions and rules that do not change from one administration to the next but also how the current coalition Government operates and recent changes to legislation such as the establishment of fixed-term Parliaments. The content of the Cabinet Manual is not party political – it is a record of fact, and I welcome the role that the previous government, select committees and constitutional experts have played in developing it in draft to final publication.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Army Officer Corps, 1909-1945
    1 A New Zealand Style of Military Leadership? Battalion and Regimental Combat Officers of the New Zealand Expeditionary Forces of the First and Second World Wars A thesis provided in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand Wayne Stack 2014 2 Abstract This thesis examines the origins, selection process, training, promotion and general performance, at battalion and regimental level, of combat officers of the New Zealand Expeditionary Forces of the First and Second World Wars. These were easily the greatest armed conflicts in the country’s history. Through a prosopographical analysis of data obtained from personnel records and established databases, along with evidence from diaries, letters, biographies and interviews, comparisons are made not only between the experiences of those New Zealand officers who served in the Great War and those who served in the Second World War, but also with the officers of other British Empire forces. During both wars New Zealand soldiers were generally led by competent and capable combat officers at all levels of command, from leading a platoon or troop through to command of a whole battalion or regiment. What makes this so remarkable was that the majority of these officers were citizen-soldiers who had mostly volunteered or had been conscripted to serve overseas. With only limited training before embarking for war, most of them became efficient and effective combat leaders through experiencing battle. Not all reached the required standard and those who did not were replaced to ensure a high level of performance was maintained within the combat units.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, Ist January 1962 Central Chancery of the Orders of Knighthood
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, IST JANUARY 1962 CHANCERY OF THE ORDER OF SAINT To be Commanders : MICHAEL AND SAINT GEORGE Arthur James Robert COLLINS, Esq. The QUEEN has been graciously pleased to give Allen John Bridson GOLDSMITH, Esq., F.R.C.S., directions for the following promotions in, and L.R.C.P. appointments to, the Most Distinguished Captain Andrew Colin Paul JOHNSTONE, O.B.E., Order of Saint Michael^and Saint George: 'British Overseas Airways Corporation. Muriel, Mrs. MURE. To be a Member of the First Class, or Knight Grand Cross, of the said Most Distinguished To be Members of the Fourth Class : Order : John CHARLTON, Esq. Sir Henry Ashley CLARKE, G.C.V.O., K.C.M.G., John William Piaulin DUNDAS, Esq. Her Majesty's Ambassador Extraordinary and Squadron Leader Kenneth James Ernest Plenipotentiary in Rome. HANNAH, Royal Air Force. The Reverend Prebendary Herbert HARRIS. To be Members of the Second Class, or Knights Group Captain Richard Gordon WAKEFORP, Commanders, of the said Most Distinguished O.B.E., A.F.C., Royal Air Force. Order : Clive LOEHNIS, Esq., C.M.G., Director, Govern- To be Members of the Fifth Class : ment Communications Headquarters. Miss Ethel Stradhan COLQUHOUN, M.B.E. Dermot Francis MACDERMOT, Esq., C.M.G., Superintendent Alfred EAST, Berkshire Con- 'C.B.E., Her Majesty's Ambassador Extraordi- stabulary. nary and Plenipotentiary in Bangkok. Miss Barbara EVANS, M.B.E. Francis Ralph Hay MURRAY, Esq., C.B., C.M.G., Wallace George LEAPER, Esq. Her Majesty's Ambassador Extraordinary and Captain Kenneth Alexander McLEAN, M.B.E., 'Plenipotentiary (design-ate) in Athens.
    [Show full text]
  • HMS Vindictive V2.Docx
    Twisting the Dragon’s Tail H.M.S. Vindictive H.M.S. Vindictive was an Arrogant-class protected cruiser built at H.M. Dockyard Portsmouth. She was launched in December 1897 and commissioned in July 1900, entering service with the Mediterranean Squadron. The Arrogant class was designed to operate with the main battle fleet; being intended to finish off crippled enemy ships by ramming, and were originally described as "Fleet Rams". She was refitted between 1909 and 1910 for service in the 3rd Division of the Home H.M.S. Vindictive (as built): Armament (1900): Fleet, during which the 4.7” guns were replaced by additional 6” guns. Displacement: 5,750 tons 4 × QF 6-inch (152 mm) guns Obsolescent by the outbreak of First World War, in August 1914 she was assigned Length: 342 ft. (104 m) 6 × 4.7-inch (120 mm) guns to the 9th Cruiser Squadron and captured the German merchantmen Schlesien and Beam: 57 ft. 6 in (17.5m) 8 × 12-pounder (3-inch, 76 mm) guns Slawentzitz on 7 August and 8 September respectively. In 1915 she was stationed Speed: 19 knots (35 km/h; 22 mph) 3 × 3-pounder (47 mm) guns on the southeast coast of South America and from 1916 to late 1917 she served in 3 × 18 inch (450 mm) torpedo tubes the White Sea. Early in 1918 she was extensively modified at H.M. Dockyard Chatham in preparation for the Zeebrugge Raid. She was fitted with an 11-inch howitzer on her quarter-deck and two 7.5 inch howitzers for engaging the German guns at the shore end of the Mole and for firing on the locks and seaplane base.
    [Show full text]
  • British Brigadier-Generals Major-Generals Lieutenant
    BRITISH BRIGADIER-GENERALS MAJOR-GENERALS LIEUTENANT-GENRALS WHO HELD SENIOR POSITIONS IN THE CANADIAN EXPEDITIONARY FORCE 1 Lieutenant-General Sir Edwin Alfred Hervey ALDERSON, KCB Commander – 1 Canadian Corps Born: 08/04/1859 Capel St. Mary, England Married: 05/1886 Alice Mary Sergeant Died: 14/12/1927 Lowestoft, England Honours 1916 KCB 1900 CB Brigadier-General 1900 ADC Queen Victoria 1883 Gold Medal Royal Humane Society Military 1876 Lieutenant Norfolk Militia Artillery 1878 Lieutenant 91st Foot (His Father’s Regiment) 1880 Lieutenant Queen’s Own Royal West Kent Regiment (renamed) 1880 Lieutenant QORWK Regiment in Halifax, Nova Scotia 1881 Lieutenant QORWK Regiment to Gibraltar 1881 Lieutenant Mounted Infantry Depot, Laing’s Nek S.A. 1881 Lieutenant First Boer War 1883 Lieutenant Mounted Camel Regiment for Relief of Khartoum 1884 Captain European Mounted Infantry Depot Aldershot 1890 Captain Adjutant Queen’s Own Royal West Kent Regiment 1894 Major Staff College, Camberley 1896 Lieutenant-Colonel Mashonaland Commanding Local Troops 1897 Lieutenant-Colonel Return to Aldershot 1900 Brigadier-General Mounted Infantry Depot South Africa 1903 Brigadier-General Commander 2nd British Brigade at Aldershot 1906 Major-General Cdr 6th Infantry Division Poona, South India 1912 Major-General Semi-Retirement as Hunt Master in Shropshire 1914 Major-General Commander East Anglian Yeomanry 25/09/1914 Lieutenant-General Appointed Commander 1st Canadian Division 1915 Lieutenant-General Commanding 1st Canadian Division in France 04/1916 Lieutenant-General
    [Show full text]
  • The Honours System
    House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee The Honours System Second Report of Session 2012–13 Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/pasc Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 17 July 2012 HC 19 [incorporating HC 1921-i, Session 2010-12] Published on 31 August 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £15.50 The Public Administration Select Committee (PASC) The Public Administration Select Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the reports of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioner for England, which are laid before this House, and matters in connection therewith, and to consider matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by civil service departments, and other matters relating to the civil service. Current membership Mr Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) (Chair) Alun Cairns MP (Conservative, Vale of Glamorgan) Michael Dugher MP (Labour, Barnsley East) Charlie Elphicke MP (Conservative, Dover) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Robert Halfon MP (Conservative, Harlow) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Kelvin Hopkins MP (Labour, Luton North) Greg Mulholland MP (Liberal Democrat, Leeds North West) Priti Patel MP (Conservative, Witham) Lindsay Roy MP (Labour, Glenrothes) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 146. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DESIRE to FILL Addiction and British Visual Culture, 1751-1919
    THE DESIRE TO FILL Addiction and British Visual Culture, 1751-1919 By Julia Kathryn Skelly A thesis submitted to the Department of Art in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (July 2010) Copyright © Julia Kathryn Skelly, 2010 Abstract In “The Desire to Fill” I examine British visual culture, including paintings, graphic art, photographs, advertisements and architecture, in relation to the lived experience of addiction. My study begins in 1751, the year that William Hogarth produced his engravings Gin Lane and Beer Street, and it ends in 1919, the year that Alfred Priest exhibited his painting Cocaine at the Royal Academy’s annual Summer Exhibition. There are four underlying arguments in this text. First, that addiction to drugs and alcohol is a manifestation of a desire to “fill a void.” Second, that addiction has long been thought to be legible from the body. Third, that addiction cannot be reliably read from the body, whether in life or an image. Fourth, any project that is concerned with addiction and visual culture is therefore a paradoxical one, and must, by necessity, be a speculative one. My methodological approach in this text is influenced by feminist theory and queer theory, and I explore the history of addiction using a continuist framework. In other words, I suggest that, although the identities of the “addict” and “alcoholic” as we know them today were discursively constructed at the end of the nineteenth century, people experienced addiction before these identities came into being. In that vein, I suggest that the woman in Hogarth’s Gin Lane is an alcoholic, and I show how anxieties about alcoholic mothers have remained remarkably consistent over the last three hundred years.
    [Show full text]