DOCSLIB.ORG

UEFA EURO 2008™ Football & Social Responsibility Evaluation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UEFA EURO 2008™ Football & Social Responsibility Evaluation Report UEFA EURO 2008™ Football & Social Responsibility Evaluation Report Biel/Bienne, October 2008 0 An Evaluation of the UEFA EURO 2008™ Football and Social Responsibility Projects 0 Impressum Layout: Monika Hägle Printing: media perret, Aarberg Print run: 30 copies © Copyright 2008 I SCHWERY CONSULTING ExecutIvE SUmmary This study was commissioned to evaluate the Results from the Fan Embassies project impact of the five football and social responsi- showed that 97% of the fans that used the ser- bility projects of the UEFA EURO 2008™ tourna- vice had their questions answered; 95% rated ment (the “Tournament”). Impact was measured the service as ‘fast and uncomplicated’; and against the expectations of project organisers 20% did not think their questions could have and UEFA, with special attention to unintended been answered at a tourist office. However, outcomes. The approach of this study was focu- many fans (86% around the host cities) were sed on the promotion of institutional learning unaware of what Fan Embassies were. Results in providing recommendations for UEFA and highlight that Fan Embassies’ focal point needs its project partners. Triangulation was used to to be on fan work (coordinating work with cross-check data collection among the five pro- UEFA and the local authorities, answering jects. Questionnaires, surveys, checklists, es- tournament-based questions, etc.) rather than says, interviews and observations were among touristic advice. This is especially the case in the methods used by the evaluation team. countries with a well established tourism in- frastructure. Research on the EUROSCHOOLS 2008 project found that there was a significant improvement The Score for the Red Cross project was unique in each of the six scales (attitude towards fo- in its approach of fundraising at a major spor- reigners; evaluation of the positive social cha- ting event and succeeded in integrating lessons racteristics of sport; understanding of foreign learned from four years ago at the UEFA EURO culture; respect; affinity to the ambassador 2004™ tournament. It fell short of raising the country; and valuation of the project) among funds that were expected but had an impres- participants that had the lowest 33% of scores sive ground strategy that gave a clear message in the pre-survey. However, the lower third of to fans and added value to ICRC institutional the control group also improved significantly donors. More support would have been needed in three of the four scales it was tested on, cas- by the National Societies of the Red Cross to ting a shadow over the aforementioned results. support the video clip that aired in some Euro- Interviews with participating school teachers pean countries during the matches. highlighted the positive impact that children could freely express their creativity by working The Football for All project was well received in different school subjects on a single topic. by fans that were present in the stadiums du- There was also a deeper reflection on the term ring the build up to the quarter-final matches. ‘fairness’ which extended beyond its sporting The project was not well covered in the media definition. and stood out as being less integrated into the Football and Social Responsibility campaign Awareness of the Unite Against Racism project than the other projects. It did have an uninten- was shown to be high among journalists and ded output of strengthening a network of fans in the stadiums during the Tournament. disabled sport organisations in Switzerland A Swiss national survey revealed that more and Austria. than half of the population (54%) recognised the campaign. There was, however, some scep- ticism towards UEFA’s motives for supporting this project in a tournament where it appeared to have little relevancy. Where incidents did oc- cur there was no reference made to the project in press releases published by UEFA. An Evaluation of the UEFA EURO 2008™ Football and Social Responsibility Projects i COntEntS ExECUtIvE SUmmARY.............................................................................i Preface................................................................................................. iv 1. Swiss Representative Survey...........................................................5 2. EUROSCHOOLS 2008.........................................................................6 3. Unite Against Racism...................................................................... 10 4. Fan Embassies................................................................................. 11 5. Score for the Red Cross.................................................................. 13 6. Football for All................................................................................. 14 7. Recommendations for UEFA........................................................... 15 8. Observations and remarks on the Respect campaign................. 16 An Evaluation of the UEFA EURO 2008™ Football and Social Responsibility Projects iii PREFACE This report has adopted a critical approach This short version of the report includes the with a focus on institutional learning. While conclusions and recommendations made for this approach necessitates acknowledgment of each project. Please contact the authors if you good practice, it only contributes to a small wish to obtain the full report. part of the overall content of the report. The We would like to thank UEFA, for providing main focus is on identifying aspects that did not us with the access that made the evalua- work as expected and suggesting ways in which tion possible, and the project organisers for they can be improved. This method is purely in- giving us their time and honest opinions for the tended to maximise the learning effect and sake of improvement. should not undermine the merits of individual projects, all of which delivered on their com- mitments. iv An Evaluation of the UEFA EURO 2008™ Football and Social Responsibility Projects 1. Swiss Representative Survey An external agency was engaged to carry out a Dates: The survey was carried out during June survey among residents of Switzerland’s four 30 – July 24, 2008. host cities, and Lausanne, to give an overview of awareness for the five FSR campaigns. Results: These figures indicate the percentage of respondents that answered “Yes” to the Question: “UEFA supported many projects and question. campaigns during the EURO 2008 tournament. Which of the following projects have you heard about?” EUROSCHOOLS 2008 9.9 % methodology: Respondents in each of the diffe- Unite Against Racism 54.1 % rent cities were contacted at random via tele- phone and asked the aforementioned ques- Fan Embassies 10.3 % tion. Score for the Red Cross 19.9 % Sample size: 1,003 people in Switzerland (from Football for All 28.0 % Basel, Bern, Geneva, Zurich and Lausanne) Diagrammatical representation Figure 2: Percentage of respondents (N=1003) indicating awareness of each FSR campaign Key Findings: It must be concluded that the name. Although the same could be said for general population were not aware of the Unite Against Racism, this project has gained different FSR projects, with the exception of recognition through being part of an ongoing Unite Against Racism, where over half of the campaign. Recognition of the EUROSCHOOLS respondents recognised the name. Relatively 2008 and Fan Embassies project were more in- high awareness of the Football for All project line with the results from this evaluation. The was unexpected and did not concur with results results act as a good benchmark for the former from this evaluation. It can be assumed that but for the latter – in the context of the public some results from this survey are anomalous service it offers – it underlines a more proble- due to this project having a familiar-sounding matic issue. An Evaluation of the UEFA EURO 2008™ Football and Social Responsibility Projects 5 2. EUROSCHOOLS (ES) 2.1. Conclusions Triangulation, of quantitative and qualitative (Respect). For this reason, the positive results assessment techniques, was used as a way of of ES should not be overrated. assuring the accuracy of results. However, the Feedback to the project organisers and re- interpretation of both sets of these results search team was very positive, despite initial seems to suggest that quantitatively, the re- pessimism from the schools on their perceived sults have underestimated the impact of the scale of the project. Most highly praised was project, and qualitatively, they may have overe- the impact that Fair Play tournaments had on stimated it. integration and tolerance within schools and Looking at the quantitative analysis, the first classes. data collection showed that the students taking Organisers developed a practical curriculum part in the project already had high scores (po- considering the different variables involved sitive attitudes) across the six scales (Foreig- (participation, time, resources, etc.). It provided ners, Sport, Culture, Respect, Country and Pro- the flexibility to allow schools (importantly ject). These high scores could explain why no here, the children more so than the teachers) improvement could be ascertained from the to be creative and invent their own projects. post-survey, and why, in some cases, lower scores were also observed. The cultural dimension of the project enriched the students’ everyday life but as an isolated Importantly, the 33% of students who scored project it is not sustainable to fight discrimina- lowest for each scale reported
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UEFA Euro 2008
    For safe use of this product, carefully read the following section of this manual and the Precautions section of the instruction manual supplied with the PSP® (PlayStation®Portable) system before use. Retain both this Contents software manual and the instruction manual for future reference. 2 GettinG started WARNING: PHOTOSENSITIVITY/EPILEPSY/SEIZURES A very small percentage of individuals may experience epileptic seizures or blackouts when exposed to certain 3 startinG the Game light patterns or flashing lights. Exposure to certain patterns or backgrounds on a screen or when playing video 4 Complete Controls games may trigger epileptic seizures or blackouts in these individuals. These conditions may trigger previously undetected epileptic symptoms or seizures in persons who have no history of prior seizures or epilepsy. If you, 8 playinG the Game or anyone in your family, has an epileptic condition or has had seizures of any kind, consult your physician before playing. IMMEDIATELY DISCONTINUE use and consult your physician before resuming gameplay if you 9 play now or your child experience any of the following health problems or symptoms: 10 UeFa eURO 2008™ • dizziness • disorientation • altered vision • seizures 10 European CampaiGn • eye or muscle twitches • any involuntary movement or convulsion • loss of awareness 11 Game modes __________________________________________________________________________________RESUME GAMEPLAY ONLY ON APPROVAL OF YOUR PHYSICIAN. 12 Multiplayer mode Use and handling of video games to reduce the likelihood of a seizure ™ • Use in a well-lit area and keep a safe distance from the screen. 12 my UeFa eURO 2008 ® • Avoid prolonged use of the PSP system. Take a 15-minute break during each hour of play.
    [Show full text]
  • Uefa Euro 2020 Final Tournament Draw Press Kit
    UEFA EURO 2020 FINAL TOURNAMENT DRAW PRESS KIT Romexpo, Bucharest, Romania Saturday 30 November 2019 | 19:00 local (18:00 CET) #EURO2020 UEFA EURO 2020 Final Tournament Draw | Press Kit 1 CONTENTS HOW THE DRAW WILL WORK ................................................ 3 - 9 HOW TO FOLLOW THE DRAW ................................................ 10 EURO 2020 AMBASSADORS .................................................. 11 - 17 EURO 2020 CITIES AND VENUES .......................................... 18 - 26 MATCH SCHEDULE ................................................................. 27 TEAM PROFILES ..................................................................... 28 - 107 POT 1 POT 2 POT 3 POT 4 BELGIUM FRANCE PORTUGAL WALES ITALY POLAND TURKEY FINLAND ENGLAND SWITZERLAND DENMARK GERMANY CROATIA AUSTRIA SPAIN NETHERLANDS SWEDEN UKRAINE RUSSIA CZECH REPUBLIC EUROPEAN QUALIFIERS 2018-20 - PLAY-OFFS ................... 108 EURO 2020 QUALIFYING RESULTS ....................................... 109 - 128 UEFA EURO 2016 RESULTS ................................................... 129 - 135 ALL UEFA EURO FINALS ........................................................ 136 - 142 2 UEFA EURO 2020 Final Tournament Draw | Press Kit HOW THE DRAW WILL WORK How will the draw work? The draw will involve the two-top finishers in the ten qualifying groups (completed in November) and the eventual four play-off winners (decided in March 2020, and identified as play-off winners 1 to 4 for the purposes of the draw). The draw will spilt the 24 qualifiers
    [Show full text]
  • Uefa Euro 2008
    Expect emotions Info-Guide Impressum Publisher Euro 2008 SA Headquarters Route de St.-Cergue 9 1260 Nyon 1 Switzerland Tel.: +41 (0) 848 00 2008 Fax: +41 (0) 848 01 2008 Translation UEFA Language Services Design The Works Ltd. / Leeds (England) Layout/Setting team2graphics / Helsingør (Denmark) Printing ATAR Roto Press SA / Vernier (Switzerland) Photos: Keystone, GEPA, Action Images, L’Equipe, EMPICS, Terry Linke, Euro 2008 SA, UEFA 2 Contents 4 Editorial – Expect emotions 6 UEFA EURO 2008™ – Facts and figures 7 Countdown 8 Distances and travel times 10 UEFA EURO 2008™ match schedule 12 The stadiums 14 The finals 15 The winning captains The champion coaches 16 Attendances 17 Numbers games from 2004 in Portugal 18 Brief portraits of the host countries 22 The two host associations 26 The organisers 27 The Board of Administration 32 Tasks of Euro 2008 SA 33 The Management Board 36 EURO ABC – from A for accommodation to Z for Zurich 70 Contact details The Henri Delaunay trophy and EUROPASS, the official UEFA EURO 2008™ match ball. 3 Expect emotions The official UEFA EURO 2008™ slogan, expect emotions, describes in a nutshell what the 2008 European Championship has to offer: emotions that are felt by everyone alike – be they fans, players, coaches, referees, officials or organisers. Over a million spectators will flock to the 31 matches in the eight stadiums. Many millions will celebrate on the streets and in the official fan zones. Eight billion (cumulative) television viewers will share the excitement on screen. UEFA EURO 2008™ is by far the biggest sports event ever to take place in Austria and Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from EURO 2008 in Austria/Switzerland
    Football-Tourists and Their Contribution to the Economic Impact - Evidence from EURO 2008 in Austria/Switzerland Holger Preuss, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany, [email protected] Norbert Schütte, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany Keywords: EURO 2008, mega events, macroeconomic impact, visitor expenditures Abstract Background Ever more nations and cities apply to stage mega sport events. The most challenging bid procedures are those for Olympic Games and the FIFA and UEFA football tournaments. One reason to enter the costly bidding process is the prospect to attract autonomous money and to speed up the infra-structural development of the host city and region. Häussermann & Siebel (1993) call this strategy "Festivalization of city politics". It is a fact, that different mega events have different effects for the hosts, partly due to the different infrastructure existent in the city (Hall, 1992, Preuss, 2007, Kurscheidt 2008). Therefore – at the end of the day – each host should check if the mega event staged really had a positive macroeconomic out-come. Only this justifies investments of scarce public resources into the event. A proportionally important but extremely difficult part of the autonomous expenditures spent in the host city and region is the consumption of the event visitors. Their intention to visit to event location, the attractiveness of the city but also the framework of the event (e.g. countries participating, reach-ability of event location etc.) makes each event unique. Aim This presentation will focus on the visitor’s consumption at the EURO 2008 in Aus- tria/Switzerland. It will show the visitor’s consumption as a significant contribution to the overall eco-nomic success of the EURO 2008 for Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of the UEFA EURO2008 in Switzerland
    FACHHOCHSCHULE ZENTRALSCHWEIZ ITW INSTITUT FÜR TOURISMUSWIRTSCHAFT LUZERN Heinz Rütter Marc Amstutz Jürg Stettler Antoine de Bary Daniela Grozea- Helmenstein Economic impact of the UEFA EURO2008TM in Switzerland Study on behalf of the UEFA and Swiss Football Association in teamwork with the Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Vienna Rüschlikon / Lucerne, November 2004 Economic impact of the UEFA EURO 2008TM in Switzerland C R E D I T S Client UEFA Swiss Football Association (SFV-ASF) Prepared by Rütter + Partner, concertgroup, Rüschlikon Institute of Tourism (ITW), Lucerne School of Business Project management Dr. Heinz Rütter, Rütter + Partner Prof. Dr. Jürg Stettler, Institute of Tourism (ITW) Authors Heinz Rütter, Rütter + Partner Jürg Stettler, ITW Marc Amstutz, ITW Antoine de Bary, Rütter + Partner Partner Institution Institute for Advanced Studies IHS (author of chapter 4.4, 4.5 and 6): Daniela Grozea-Helmenstein Project support Mark O’Keefe, UEFA Christian Mutschler, director UEFA EURO 2008TM Schweiz Patrick Jost, management UEFA EURO 2008TM Schweiz Translation Peter Grimshaw IHS (chapter 4.4, 4.5 and 6) Contact Rütter + Partner Institute of Tourism (ITW) concertgroup Lucerne School of Business (University of Applied Sciences) Weingartenstrasse 5 Zentralstrasse 18 8803 Rüschlikon 6002 Luzern Tel. +41 (0)43 724 27 70 Tel. +41 (0)41 228 41 45 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] www.ruetter.ch www.itw.ch C O N T E N T Content Executive Summary 1. Introduction 13 1.1 Objectives and study areas 13 1.2 Limitations and definitions 14 1.3 Methodological procedure 15 1.4 Structure of report 17 2.
    [Show full text]
  • UEFA EURO 2012 Social Responsibility Report
    UEFAUEFA EUROEURO 2012 SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION A major tournament such as UEFA EURO 2012 touches on many economic, social and environmental aspects which are related to sustainability. Many of them, such as transport, procurement, workforce training, volunteerism, cus- tomer satisfaction, customer privacy, health and safety, and doping, are part of the core business of the organisation of the tournament. In 2008, UEFA cooperated with the governments of Switzerland and Austria in their efforts to prepare a social re- sponsibility report on UEFA EURO 2008. The report was inspired by the guidelines issued by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI; www.globalreporting.org) – the leading global network for sustainability reporting. Since then, UEFA has supported efforts to develop a specific sector supplement for event organisers (EOSS) and participated in the advisory board. This social responsibility report is an important step, demonstrating UEFA’s clear commitment to football’s social responsibility. The report covers all aspects that were relevant to the tournament and under UEFA’s control or influence. It is a credit to those involved in UEFA EURO 2012 that social aspects of sustainability were improved on relative to UEFA EURO 2008, given the challenging political, economic and social circumstances. 3 INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION / ORGANISATIONORGANISATION OFOF UEFAUEFA EUROEURO 2012 / THETHE STAGESTAGE / THETHE TOURNAMENTTOURNAMENT / BEHINDBEHIND THETHE SCENESSCENES / ORGANISATION OF UEFA EURO 2012 Within UEFA, the operations division (UEFA Events SA) had ownership of UEFA EURO 2012 and was responsible for the organisation of the event. UEFA Events was in charge of all tournament-related matters, managed the entire programme and supported the local organising committees (LOCs) in Poland (Euro 2012 – Polska Sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Offensive Transitions in High-Performance Football: Differences Between UEFA Euro 2008 and UEFA Euro 2016
    fpsyg-10-01230 June 15, 2019 Time: 10:47 # 1 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Diposit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 18 June 2019 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01230 Offensive Transitions in High-Performance Football: Differences Between UEFA Euro 2008 and UEFA Euro 2016 Rubén Maneiro1, Claudio A. Casal2*, Isaac Álvarez1, José Enrique Moral1, Sergio López1, Antonio Ardá3 and José Luís Losada4 1 Faculty of Science of Education, Pontifical University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain, 2 Department of Science of Physical Activity and Sport, Catholic University of Valencia “San Vicente Mártir”, Valencia, Spain, 3 Department of Physical and Sports Education, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain, 4 Department of Methodology for Behavioral Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Coaches, footballers and researchers agree that offensive transitions are one of the most important moments in football today. In a sport where defense over attack dominates, with low scores on the scoreboard, the importance of these actions from the offensive point of view becomes very important. Despite this, scientific literature is still very limited on this topic. Therefore, the objectives set out in the present investigation Edited by: have been two: first, by means of a proportion analysis and the application of a chi- Maicon Rodrigues Albuquerque, square test, it was intended to describe the possible differences between the offensive Federal University of Minas Gerais, transitions made in the UEFA Euro 2008 and UEFA Euro 2016; then, through different Brazil multivariate analyzes based on logistic regression models, it was intended to know the Reviewed by: Hugo Borges Sarmento, possible differences among the proposed models.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 UEFA European Football Championship Final Tournament
    UEFA European Football Championship Final Tournament 2016 TouTournament Requirements Tournament Requirements 01 Introduction and Overview 02 UEFA EURO Vision 03 Overall Tournament Concept 04 Tournament Legacy 05 Social Responsibility and Environment 06 Political and Economic Aspects 07 Legal Aspects 08 Stadiums 09 Ground Transport 10 Airports 11 Accommodation and Training Centres 12 Technology Infrastructure 13 International Broadcast Centre 14 Fan Zones 15 Safety and Security 16 Host Country and City Promotion 17 Organisational and Operational Matters 18 Pre-Tournament Events 19 Financing 20 UEFA's Responsibilities Introduction and Overview UEFA EURO 2016 – Tournament requirements Sector 01: Introduction and Overview Sector 01: Introduction and Overview Table of Contents 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Glossary............................................................................................................................................................ 4 3. The bid procedure............................................................................................................................................ 7 4. The bid requirements....................................................................................................................................... 8 The tournament requirements........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UEFA EURO 2008™ Football & Social Responsibility Evaluation Report
    UEFA EURO 2008™ Football & Social Responsibility Evaluation Report Biel/Bienne, October 2008 0 An Evaluation of the UEFA EURO 2008™ Football and Social Responsibility Projects 0 Impressum Publisher: SCHWERY CONSULTING Authors: Dr. Rolf Schwery, Daniel Cade Layout: Monika Hägle Printing: media perret, Aarberg Print run: 160 copies © Copyright 2009 I SCHWERY CONSULTING ExECUtIvE SUmmARY This study was commissioned to evaluate the Results from the Fan Embassies project sho- impact of the five football and social responsi- wed that 97 % of the fans that used the ser- bility projects of the UEFA EURO 2008™ tourna- vice had their questions answered; 95 % rated ment (the “Tournament”). Impact was measured the service as ‘fast and uncomplicated’; and against the expectations of project organisers 20 % did not think their questions could have and UEFA, with special attention to unintended been answered at a tourist office. However, outcomes. The approach of this study was fo- many fans (86 % around the host cities) were cused on the promotion of institutional learning unaware of what Fan Embassies were. Results in providing recommendations for UEFA and highlight that Fan Embassies’ focal point needs its project partners. Triangulation was used to to be on fan work (coordinating work with UEFA cross-check data collection among the five pro- and the local authorities, answering tourna- jects. Questionnaires, surveys, checklists, es- ment-based questions, etc.) rather than tou- says, interviews and observations were among ristic advice. This is especially
    [Show full text]
  • Uefa Euro 2024
    UEFA EURO 2024 Evaluation Report Introduction The bids were evaluated over a period of four Introduction months using a methodology that endeavours to make the analysis factual and transparent. Each The UEFA European Football Championship is the sector was weighted individually, based on its most prestigious international football importance to the success of the tournament. competition hosted for UEFA members' national Within each sector, key parameters were defined teams and determines the continental champion and weighted, and each bid was evaluated in of Europe. It has been held every four years since terms of the requirements of these parameters. 1960. This event showcases European football at These detailed evaluations were then collated to its best and is a great source of pride for the provide an overall assessment. associations and cities that host it. When bidders' answers were incomplete or The selection of hosts for the 2024 tournament unclear, they were given the opportunity to started on 9 December 2016, when the official bid provide further information and clarifications. invitation was sent out to all UEFA member associations. The German Football Federation The result of this comprehensive evaluation (DFB) and the Turkish Football Federation (TFF) carried out by the UEFA administration is were announced as bidders and the bid summarised in this report. requirements published on 17 March 2017. The bidders' expertise and investment are UEFA provided the bidders with ongoing support, praiseworthy. Contributions were required from such as the opening workshop at which the bid various levels of government, as well as from requirements were presented and discussed, a stadium owners, transport companies, centralised website for bidding documents, and accommodation providers, tourist boards and email support for questions and answers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Incentive (In)Compatibility of Group-Based Qualification Systems
    The incentive (in)compatibility of group-based qualification systems L´aszl´oCsat´o* Institute for Computer Science and Control (SZTAKI) Laboratory on Engineering and Management Intelligence, Research Group of Operations Research and Decision Systems Corvinus University of Budapest (BCE) Department of Operations Research and Actuarial Sciences Budapest, Hungary 21st April 2020 Ein Fehler in der ursprunglichen¨ Versammlung der Heere ist im ganzen Verlauf des Feldzuges kaum wieder gut zu machen.1 (Helmuth Karl Bernhard von Moltke: Taktisch-strategische Aufs¨atzeaus den Jahren 1857 bis 1871 ) Abstract Tournament organisers supposedly design rules such that a team cannot be strictly better off by exerting a lower effort. However, the European qualification tourna- ments for recent FIFA soccer World Cups are known to violate this requirement, which inspires our study on the incentive compatibility of similar group-based qualification systems. Theorems listing the sufficient and necessary conditions of strategy-proofness are provided and applied to classify several soccer qualification tournaments for FIFA World Cups and UEFA European Championships. Two reasonable mechanisms are proposed to solve the problem of incentive incompatibil- ity: the first is based on abolishing the anonymity of the matches discarded inthe comparison of teams from different groups, while the second involves a rethinking of the seeding procedure. Our results have useful implications for the governing bodies of major sports. JEL classification number: C44, D71, Z20 arXiv:1804.04422v8 [physics.soc-ph] 20 Apr 2020 MSC class: 62F07, 91B14 Keywords: mechanism design; strategy-proofness; manipulation; tournament ranking; FIFA World Cup * E-mail: [email protected] 1 “A single error in the original assembly of the armies can hardly ever be rectified during the entire course of the campaign.” (Source: Holger H.
    [Show full text]
  • UEFA EURO 2008" Sustainability Report
    UEFA EURO 2008™ Sustainability Report Photo: GEPA pictures/ Witters/ Matthias Hangst UEFA EURO 008™ Sustainability Report Issued by the two host nations, Austria and Switzerland, in cooperation with Euro 008 SA along with the eight host cities: Basle, Berne, Geneva, Innsbruck, Klagenfurt, Salzburg, Vienna and Zurich Photo: FOSPO Photo: ZS communication+art Introduction 10 :1 From sustainability strategy to sustainability report 6 :2 Project Organisation 8 1:0 :3 Comparison with other large sporting events 9 Economic dimension 20 :1 Business location :2 Tourism 6 :3 Infrastructure 9 2:0 :4 Regional and biological products / fair trade :5 Summary of economic goal achievement Environmental dimension 34 :1 Transport 8 :2 Energy and climate protection :3 Resources and waste 7 3:0 :4 Environment management 0 :5 Summary of environmental goal achievement Social / Cultural dimension 54 :1 Fan coaching 7 :2 Barrier-free / obstacle-free access 9 :3 Youth, promotion of exercise and (football) culture 6 4:0 :4 Prevention and youth protection 66 :5 Summary of social / cultural goal achievement 67 Findings and recommendations 68 :1 General assessment and project organisation 70 5:0 :2 Content evaluation 7 Glossary / Abbreviations 75 Acknowledgements 78 Preface The EURO 2008, one of the best The bottom line is entirely and most successful large sport- respectable. By putting into The EURO 2008 thus belongs among the ing events ever, was held this place the Kombi-Ticket, the ranks of sustainable events, which we year. The images transmitted Photo: BMLFUW use of returnable cups, the use began with the focus of the EU Coun- around the world of the football of green electricity and the cil Presidency in 2006, and which shall festival, hosted in such a peace- involvement of people with dis- hopefully be followed by many other such ful and athletically fair manner, abilities are just a few examples events, also in international football.
    [Show full text]